HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPRING CREEK FARMS NORTH - ODP - 24-00A - CORRESPONDENCE - TRAFFIC STUDYE�
DEC-19-2000 TUE 09:37 AM PROFESSIONAL OFFICES FAX NO. 3032201818
Account: W04714 DemographicandlncomeForecasf
Site: 35428 PREPAREDFOR;
Cum berlandCompanies,Inc.
1801 Riverside
FortCollins,C080525
C oord s:40.5638 5 5-10 5.04 3789
Area&
11 /30/00
WleRadius
P. 09
Snapshot
1990Census
2000Update
2005Forecast
Population
104,373
134,835
149,596
Households
39,908
52.630
31,102
58,879
34.162
Families
AverageHouseholdSize
24,196
2.47
1.78
2.44
Owner-occupledHHs
22,598
35,269
41.987
Renter-occupiedHHs
17.310
17,361
16,892
MedianHousehold{ncome
30,374
51,641
60,863
AverageHouseholdincome
35,259
13,682
64,377
25,330
79,251
31,394
PerCe pita Income
30.6
32.9
33.6
MedianAge
�-
AnnualPercentChanget02000.2005
Trends
National
Population
2. 9%°
0.88e
1.04
Households
2.38%
0.74%
Families
1.97go
3.81 %
1.41 °%
OwnerHHs
4,79%
4.57%
PerCapitalncorne
1990Censtls
2000Update
2005Forecast
Householdsbylneome
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
<S15,000
10,885
27.3%
6.410
14.2%
5,385
9.1%
$15.000424.999
7.372
18.5%
5,979
11.4%
5.154
8.8%
$25,000434,999
6.852
14.7%
6,020
11.4%
5,559
9.4%
$35.0004549.999
6,677
16.7%
9,016
17.1°%
9.813
16.7%
$50,000-S74,999
6,014
15.1°%
10,957
20.8%
12,499
21.2%
$75.000-$99,999
1,936
4.9%
6,076
11.5%
7,462
12.7%
5100.000•$149,999
903
2.3%
5,422
2,750
10.3%
5.2%
7,913
5,026
13.4%
6.5%
$150,000+ -
349
0.9%
r
PopulationbyAge
7,574
7.3%
9.157
6.8%
9,848
6.6%
e5
5-j4
13,389
12.8%
17.122
12.7%
18,125
12.1%
15.19
9,345
9.0%
12,652
9.5%
14.212
0.5°%
20-24
14.861
14.3%
17,440
12.9%
20.040
13.4%
25.34
20.153
19.3%
19,066
14.2%
19,999
13A%
35.44
18,802
16.1°%
21,733
16.1%
21,955
14.7°%
45-64
14.033
13.4%
26,987
20.0%
33,574
22.4 %
65.74
4,612
4.4°%
5,342
4.0%
5,846
3.9%
75-84
2,633
2.5%
3,661
2.7%
4,162
2.6%
B5+
950
0.9%
1,456
1.1%
1,837
1.2%
RaceandEthnicity
While
97.492
93.4%
124,126
92.1%
136,682
91.4%
Black
928
0.9°%
1,248
0.9°%
1.388
0.9%
Asian/Pacificl slander
2.229
2.1%
3,729
2.8%
4,647
3.1%
OtherRaces
3.108
3.0%
4,957
3.7%
6,052
4.0%
Hispanic(AnyRace)
7,662
7.3%
12,775
9.5%
16,903
10.6%
OCopyrighl2000CACl
Page3
1-800-795.7483
N
0
a
Q
0
0
0
t
O
u
to
0
�s
The I;1'IC Ex-perience
! car
Svv inl
$Fate
rntal
I Drop -in 199C
76.60
E? 16c
I `'t•''�
Fnmliatsr..S 1` ?S
=4.910
__s`
6-1.1.99
6.5
_.-:4
_ .Gal
(. _
r i999
I
:._ .
4_0-54
:G.,S!
Rentals 1995
593'•=
i9•i1S?
I?5.=59
999
61,i22
',';6
ii5.958
T-0121 Contacts' 1996
:93»3
199.03=
1999
1S5_400
165,4S5
35i.8S5
'Each use of (acifin- or amvin"
eotcnas as a ror:atr.
NOTE: EPIC ice arena use down as a r`sult
of the opening
of Provi-
dence ice rink in Windsor
EPIC ICE ARENA USE BY ACTIVITY
Other Rentals
13% Drop -in State
Adult Hockey
t 2% Leann -to -Stale
Figure Skating..' Youth Hocicc3
7 I % 220%
•its! : <_r..,, ,++ts,
"SWIMMING THE CITY"
"tcb.^+" VoaI C a f 9v2 Perna 4+n-Ccatrr Nd
r.>auT�•
`Each ttse o`a facisiI%. or acticit." isccuntcd as a cv,-tact.
Alk
fL
The rcc gets prertt• rroicdrd d:cnng <ome,rmhiic" s1.au• sem!fins
n
DEC-19-2000
TUE 09:37 AM PROFESSIONAL OFFICES , FAX NO, 3032201818
P. 07
`o
c0
H
u
C,
\�
cr
Sr
E ✓
Hoff an Mtj1
Rd
¢°
So( tr>r5 Ln N
N
N
o \ \�
°
°
o
0
o �
Kt E,�
t ,n
Buckeye SI
yOf
S 1
O
>
o
e
°y ;
o�
J or
Q e O
v>
i
v
lake
Sr
_j `
r
\\ o
�c C
Mid oint
Erin
o
0
t.
o
Dr is
.a
� 5!uorl Sc
P
Oy �•Bc �+
(,�
Kan.i00d
I
~
\ •fi
�r;rrrn Cyr
`
�¢�t
"
C!
CI
S
C
Q q�0/
5..,j o o
1
3
v o
Sionene^qa
I
1
�►
K l �4
Tr
` pr
hr�cprQ yr
y ROIf u o I
�Cf.
t.�
r
v wood V
o
ct. 4
Q 3v
o'C
Teok~otl
3°O`
Rush wood
CI
'
O
O^
U c Y C
$ o Born
r a
Porkw0o0 --
ti,d
o ' Od r
1
wo Q p
I 1
0,
IxU rr011*0
S
'
0
pCf
PA p<WOO
Or
EOSrwOC1d r3o
I 1
-AKE C
\ TeOKWJOdC• o
W
I 1
Rollin
Wvo Ct.
1
\c Or r Z
w
s O
ado a c ,
` Ct
C -
0 0
�' v
r
$
0
1
—
Q
v 3' dJ
=
.�
b
-'
0r
I cn
1
0
c
t
P PI.
G Crbsrd
Cr,
L Ilk
1`,`
�. ■r�rrar
ar wi
lri
•
�ERvr000
� - � ,
ro
X
y
3,
3:
o
0
C W 4ok r Ion
[pntenna
r
Onoro
roa
St Ndl ^J�'7V jns
qg a Sat
Cp r... C.rm•
o <
DEC-19-2000 TUE 09:36 AM PROFESSIONAL OFFICES FAX NO. 3032201818 P. 06
Based upon the analysis documented above, the following can be concluded:
• Access to the recreational amenities is available by either of two routes. The
preferred route uses the arterial and collector street system, however equal
distribution of site traffic was assigned to each route for evaluation purposes.
• Site traffic going to and returning from the recreation area must be recog-
nized as destination traffic intended to use the area streets and not cut -
through traffic.
• Site traffic using the local street system will need to travel through Parkwood
Apartments to access EPIC Center and Edora Park. Area residents are likely
using the same route cutting through Parkwood Apartments to access rec-
reational areas in addition to those wishing to travel east on Prospect or north
on Timberline. While not a desirable condition, the lack of continuity of the
local street system has made this route beneficial to local drivers.
Site traffic will not significantly impact the local street system based upon an
impact of 0.7% or less using a very conservative analysis. This is well below
the 12% impact threshold defined by the City as being significant.
I trust this letter fully addresses your concerns at this point in time. Please call if you
have any questions.
Eugene G. Coppola, P.E.
Attachments
DEC-19-2000 TUE 09:36 AM PROFESSIONAL OFFICES
FAX NO, 3032201818
P. 05
Site traffic demands associated for EPIC Center and Edora Park are summarized below.
# Trips Site as
Use Per Day % Demand Site Trips
EPIC Center 1,300 1 % 13
Edora Park 250 1 % 3
TOTAL 16
Based upon the above estimates, 8 trips per day were assigned to each access route to
EPIC Center and/or Edora Park. The impact of this traffic is assessed below.
Impact on Area Streets
Recent traffic volumes were obtained from the City for the local streets west of Johnson
Farm. To determine the impact of traffic cutting through Parkwood Apartments, an esti-
mate of daily traffic within that complex was calculated using ITE trip generation rates for
256 dwelling units. It may be understated due to the observation that traffic from resi-
dential areas to the south may be cutting through the apartment complex to travel east
on Prospect or north on Timberline. This information is presented below.
Street/Area
Current
ADT
Site
Trips
Total
Trips
Site Related
Increase
Eastwood ( N. of Trailwood)
1,160
8
1,168
0.7%
Parkwood Apts. Complex
1,700
8
1,708
0.5%
City criterion defines significant impact as site traffic increasing daily traffic by 12% or
more on local residential streets. Clearly, this threshold is not exceeded and is far from
being met.
DEC-19-2000 TUE 09:35 AM PROFESSIONAL OFFICES FAX NO. 3032201818 P. 04
1) Access Timberline, travel north to Prospect, turn west to Riverside and proceed
south on Riverside. This route uses the arterial and collector street system. Travel
distance is some 6,600 feet from the north site access to Timberline. Speeds are
typical of those achievable on arterial streets and critical tums occur under traffic sig-
nal control.
2) Access westbound Drake and turn north on Eastwood. Go north on Eastwood to the
Parkwood East apartments and cut through the apartment complex to access River-
side. Speeds are typical of residential local streets with speeds within the apartment
complex much lower given speed bumps, narrow travel ways, a circuitous route, and
other impediments. This route is some 6,700 feet long from the Drake site access.
Practically speaking, both routes are the same distance. Improved travel time and ease
of travel will likely make the arterial streets the preferred route. In order to conduct a con-
servative analysis, however, equal use of both routes was assumed.
Per discussions with EPIC Center management, an average of some 977 visitors per
day use the EPIC Center. This is estimated to represent about 650 vehicles (1,300 trips)
per day assuming a conservative 1.5 visitors per vehicle. Demographic data indicates
52,630 households within a 5 mile radius of the EPIC Center. Johnson Farm therefore
represents one percent of this demand. This is based upon year 2000 demographics
and does not consider additional growth during the time Johnson Farms is being built.
Accordingly, the site demand for EPIC Center is 13 trips per day.
Edora Park daily traffic was estimated at 250 trips during peak season. This assumes a
50 acre facility and normal day of week variations. Johnson Farm represents one per-
cent of the park demand based upon the number of households (excluding the site)
within a five -mile radius. This represents 2 - 3 trips per day without considering growth
while Johnson Farm is being built.
DEC-19-2000 TUE 09:35 AM PROFESSIONAL OFFICES FAX NO. 3032201818 P. 03
EUGENE G. COPPOLk P.E.
P.O. Box 260027
Littleton, Co 80126-0027
303-792-2450
December 11, 2000
Mr, Brock Chapman
The Cumberland Companies
6300 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 293
Englewood, CO 80111
RE: Site Traffic Diversion from Johnson Farm
Dear Mr. Chapman;
I have assessed the impact of site traffic using the neighborhood streets to the west of
the site for access to the EPIC Center area. This analysis is documented in the following
sections of this letter.
Race Ammaptic�ns
The following assumptions form the basis of the investigations conducted in this analy-
sis.
• Site residents wishing to use the EPIC Center will use the shortest, easiest,
and quickest route to access the facility.
• City criteria governing the definition of "significantly impacting" local residen-
tial streets are applicable for use in this study.
Edora Park must be considered in this study since residents will also use this
facility.
Site Acms to EPIC Center and Edora Pads
Site residents have two identifiable routes to access the EPIC Center and Edora Park
area. These are:
DEC-19-2000 TUE 09:35 AM PROFESSIONAL OFFICES FAX NO. 3032201818
P. 02
The Cumberland Companies, Inc.
6300 South Syrocuse way. Suite 293 . Englewood. CO got t t
303/779 9009 n Fax 3031220.1 i 18
Troy Jones December 13, 2000
Fort Collins Current Planning
281 N. College Ave.
P. O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
lte: Johnson Farms —'traffic Study Memorandum re: site generated traffic impacts to
Parkwood East neighborhood
Dear Troy:
Enclosed please find the recent traffic study memorandum prepared by our traffic engineer, which
quantifies the projected traffic impacts to the Parkwood East neighborhood generated by
our proposed Johnson Fame development. Prior to the Planning and Toning Board hearing, both
our traffic engineer and Eric Brachi, the City traffic engineer, agreed that the site generated traffic
impact to the Parkwood East neighborhood was insignificant. Because this was such an
important topic of discussion at the P&Z hearing, however, I requested our traffic engineer study
this issue in more detail and quantify the actual number of vehicles that could be expected to use
the local public streets within the Parkwood East neighborhood, then make a conclusion of
impacts relative to City Standards.
As you can see, the total traffic impact was estimated to be 16 vehicles per day generated by the
Johnson Farm site at full build -out. Based on this vehicle count, the traffic impact to the local
street system is 0.7% or less using a conservative analysis. This is far below the 121/a
impact threshold defined by the City as being significant.
Because this is a major issue associated with our proposed Johnson Farm application, I
respectfully request this updated traffic information be added to the City Council Staff Report and
review packages. In addition, this information should serve to assist you as the City Planner
assigned to this project in addressing questions on this subject during the City Council hearing.
Please contact me at (303) 741-1113 to verify you received this information and that this
information will be provided to City Council for their review prior to our January 2, 2001 City
Council hearing- Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
S50--.1
Vice President
Cc: Eric Brachi, Fort Collins Traffic Engineering
DEC-19-2000 TUE 09:35 AM PROFESSIONAL OFFICES
FAX NO, 3032201818
P. 01
Brock Chapman
Cumberland Companies, Inc.
6300 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 293
Denver, Colorado 80111
(303) 741-1113 phone
(303) 220-1818 fax
0
To: From: Brock Chapman
Fax: 6q'?o 4/(p zo7,0 Pages:
Phwm _ Date:
Re: CC:
OtUMent Ot For Review 0 Please Comment ❑ Plea" Reply Q Please Recycle
T-H -/we7n--5�A PW/Z �t C_ USE oni
r S.,� A �a r.Jooa
T'�' f
/zt-,olrle 7
CS Tr, GT/
���✓k yea � �
(31fie4 e,�Wapj-jK)