Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTATE HIGHWAY 14, EAST FRONTAGE ROAD - ANNEXATION & ZONING (RESUBMITTAL) - 20-00B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 -,mago Enterprises, Inc. 140 Palmer Drive • Fort Collins • Colorado 80525 Phone: (970) 226-6819 Fax: (970) 207-9256 Email: lesterkaplan@comcast.net May 30, 2005 Cameron Gloss, Director of Current Planning Community planning and Environmental Services City of Fort Collins 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522 Re: State Highway 14 — East Frontage Road Annexation J Dear Cameron: Imago Enterprises, owner of Lot 2 of the Lee Minor Lot Division in Larimer County, is pleased to submit this 35.9 acre lot for annexation to the City of Fort Collins. As we have discussed, there are many strategic reasons for the City to annex this property in the GM& including the opportunity for entry-level housing on this site plus establishing the necessary contiguity for annexation and City control of residential and key commercial properties at and near the 1-25/ Mulberry interchange. This property is part of a previous 47.5 acre parcel submitted to City of Fort Collins for annexation in July 2000 and then again in November 2002. City review of both petitions was complicated by delays with City Council adoption of the City's I-25 Subarea Plan, and the perception by Council that this Plan was necessary for zoning the property. The petition was eventually withdrawn by the applicant when Council refused the requested LMN zoning, contrary to the recommendations of staff and the Planning and Zoning Board. The I-25 Subarea Plan was finally adopted in August 2003 showing the LMN zoning district for the entire parcel. The Lee Minor Lot Division was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on August 2, 2004, splitting the property into two lots. Lot 1 is 11.3 acres along the frontage road, zoned Commercial in the County and mostly'in the Boxelder Creek floodplain. Lot 1 is no longer owned by the applicant. Lot 2, petitioned for annexation, is zoned FA-1 in the County. The annexation petition requests LMN zoning for the entire 35.9 acres, consistent with the I-25 Subarea Plan. Attached are the submission requirements for this annexation. As I understand from our recent meeting to discuss this annexation, the City intents to exercise -its power of attorney to annex the Waterdale property in the County concurrent with this requested annexation. Please note that the annexation of the Waterdale property concurrent with this annexation and LMN zoning are perquisites for the Petitioner not to exercise rights reserved in the Petition for Annexation to withdraw this petition Sincerely, Lester M. Kapla�