The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRIGDEN FARM, 8TH FILING, THE SHOPS @ RIGDEN FARM - PDP - 56-98R - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYAppr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 446 3433 0.88 T 920 3539 0.37 R 712 1583 0.75 Westbound L 374 1770 0.33 TR 670 3349 0.88 Northbound L 515 3433 0.96 T 1840 3539 0.67 R 997 1583 0.14 Southbound L 313 1770 0.80 T 1557 3539 0.95 R 966 1583 0.48 Intersection Delay = 35.7 Approach Delay LOS 0.13 61.3 E 0.26 30.6 C 38.7 D 0.45 27.2 C 0.28 28.4 C 0.20 51.7 D 47.7 D 0.15 72.2 E 0.52 18.7 B 32.0 C 0.63 7.6. A 0.52 30.2 C 0.44 40.5 D 33.1 C 0.61 11.2 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0189 Drake OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS_ Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11/17/00 am m Ti erline/Drake All other areas Fort Collins recent short on bkgrd total East/West Street North/South Street Timberline ',t forecasts, peak hour signal warrants will be met at the Timberline/Custer intersection. Signal warrant analyses are provided in Appendix C. Operation Analysis Capacity analyses were performed at the key intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year 2007 condition. The long range analysis reflects a year 2020 condition. The intersection geometry used in the various analyses is that which is currently existing or needed to achieve acceptable operation in the respective short range and long range futures. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6, the key intersections operate in the short range background condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours with the warranted signal at the Timberline/Custer intersection. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7, the key intersections operate in the long range background condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 10 and the recommended geometrics, the key intersections operate in the short range total condition as indicated in Table S. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 11, the key intersections operate in the long range total condition as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix G. The key intersections will operate acceptably. Review of the peak hour traffic volumes on Illinois Drive and the traffic assignment of site generated traffic indicates that the two full -movement intersections (Johnson Way and Waukee Drive) will operate acceptably. This conclusion is reached by inspection. Interior Street Classification The street classifications of Timberline Road, Drake Road, and Custer Drive have been established on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. The forecasted traffic volumes support those street classifications. Illinois Drive is not categorized on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. The forecasted daily traffic volume just south of Drake Road is expected to be 3100-3200 vehicles. The forecasted daily traffic volume just north of Custer Drive is expected to be 2700-2800 vehicles. Both of these volumes are within the minor collector street range. 18 Intersection Performance Summary ____________._ I.tpr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ne Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 3 j stbound --- _3 404 1554 0.09 0.26 28.1 C. 28.1 C IfTR estbound 374 1384 0.60 0.27 34.4 C 412 1585 0.32 0.26 30.3 C 32.9 C Northbound 233 1770 0.05 0.65 12.2 B i 2053 3539 0.72 0.58 17.4 B 16.4 B R 1409 1583 0.•07 0.89 0.7 A 5�uthbound 239 1770 0.25 0.65 13.1 B, 3TR 2051 3537 0.75 0.58 18.1 B 17.9 B Intersection Delay = 18.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: i Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a atthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 `hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com _ OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 'ate Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: as pm imberline/Custer A1ntersection: 4 rea Type: All other areas urisdiction: na1 ' Year: Fort Co'llors long recent t bkgrd tots roject ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline APPENDIX A WE FUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worksheet CSU Campus Transit Center 4.3 17 40 Foothills Fashion Mall r . 3.3 .' 14 . x.36 ' Fort Collins High School 1.0 9 15 Downtown Fort Collins 4.6 , .18 39 Total Travel Time 58 130 2.2 Service Level Standards Worksheet �^ 1'Ct i" 't �yj 'Y .• Ly.('£ .i rt?< tt h 'MY� I ) ^o '` -i `il 'i it i- tt h- Y `+.. t• .,- x. j�- ri, � �4 � - h .S :.!: h. it ...? . t .. :: _.,1Y�YI�,1. .k � �� .�h. CYlb. ;..i 1 i "Y.X .. - )V {^'�..• l— '.',n iJ-. Hours of Weekday Service 18 hours 16 hours X Weekday Frequency of Service , 15 minutes', : 20 minutes X Travel Time Factor 2.0 x 2.0 x X Peak Load Factor < 1.2 <_ 1.2 X 3 of 4 = LOS B cF Ar N.Lultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p.20 LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet base connectivity: specific connections to priority sites: description of applicable destination area within 1,320• including address AC�TiWT Crn1rF.IQ •J r7A,t89P,4j1Uir-1OR4Kv in1St�r7vN destination area classification (see text) /ir,r t/i rYCk n17z ' level of service - connectivity nminvn actual proposed A City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Pl- ,, BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA g3 Pedestrian LOS Worksheet Project Location Classification: :.. .- - Desaiption of Destination Area Within 1321Y Dewre ion Anis Classi1icatiun Level of Service (minimum based an p ood bcation dessification) Dkectnm vow 6�taeet 3 Ameniiss Seaelf Fort Collins High School Institution Minimum B B B B B 1 Actual C D D D D Proposed B B B B B Residential Area West of the Site Residential Minimum B B B. B B 2 Actual B B C B B Proposed B B B B B Spring Creek Farm Residentiall Commercial Minimum B B B B B 3 Actual C D D D D Proposed B B B B B Johnson Farm Property Residentiall Commercial Minimum B B B B B ET Actual . C D D D_ D Proposed B B B B B Rigden Farm Residential Minimum B B B B B 5 Actual A A B B B Proposed A A B B A Minimum 6 Actual Proposed Minimum 7 Actual Proposed . Minimum B Actual . Proposed Minimum 9 Actual Proposed Minimum 16 Actual Proposed PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA $\ APPENDIX I V HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 71 talyst: Michael ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. to Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am m Atersection: Dra a/Iowa risdiction: Fort Collins its: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short ong bkgrd(total oject ID: 0189 st/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Iowa tersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 is L T R I L T R Volume 40 615 Jt) [o cac ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 urly Flow Rate, HFR rcent Heavy Vehicles 44 2 683 38 27 2 650 5- Median Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 onfiguration .10T L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No nor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R olume 25 5 10 5 1 4U eak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 5 11 5 1 44 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 lercent rcent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? IT Storage Channelized? No No Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 1 ,Qonfiguration LT R LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1pproach ovement 1 4 17 8 9 1 10 11 12 ane Config L L I LT R I LT R (vph) 44 27 32 11 6 44 �(m) (vph) 932 881 198 436 208 468 /c 0.05 0.03 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.09 95% queue length 0.15 0.09 0.56 0.08 0.09 0.31 ontrol Delay 9.1 9.2 26.7 13.4 22.8 13.5 OS A A D B C B ,"Approach DelayB 23.3 14.6 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 1q HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period:& pm Intersection: Drake/Iowa Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short ong bkgrd total Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Iowa Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 440 10 10 610 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 488 11 11 677 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 50 5 15 10 1 65 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 55 5 16 11 1 72 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 1 0 1 1 LT R LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I LT R v (vph) 11 11 60 16 12 72 C(m) (vph) 911 1065 242 575 276 451 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.03 0.04 0.16 95% queue length 0.04 0.03 0.95 0.09 0.14 0.56 Control Delay 9.0 8.4 24.7 11.4 18.6 14.5 LOS A A C B C B Approach Delay 21.9 15.1 Approach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 14, I, HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1yst: Michael 'gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. tato Performed: 12/31/01 j lysis Time Period: am mm yI ersection: Dr�'1Ce/Illinois turisdiction: Fort Collins its: U. S. Customary alysis Year: short o g bkgrd total oject ID: 0189 !,ast/West Street: Drake 1rth/South Street: Illinois Study period (hrs): 0.25 tersection Orientation: EW Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments for Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R lume ak-Hour Factor, PHF urly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles ( than Type Undivided Channelized? nes configuration Ilbstream Signal? inorStreet: Approach Movement 7 L I ak Hour Factor, PHF urly Flow Rate, HFR rcent Heavy Vehicles _:Percent Grade M edian Storage ared Approach: Exists? J Storage RT Channelized? figuration 037 Le -+,+ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 705 250 38 677 5 1 0 1 1 0 TR L TR No No nDouna ��u�.. ... 8 9 I 10 11 12 T R I L T R 0.90 0.90 61 33 2 2 0 0 No No 1 1 R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service fi proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I R I R, (vph) (m) (vph) v/c % queue length its Delay S ch Delay ch LOS 720 0.05 0.17 10.3 B 16.6 C 370 0.16 0.58 16.6 C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich tthew J. Delich, P.E. 13.6 B 451 0.07 0.24 13.6 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY analyst: Michael agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. )ate Performed: 12/31/01 analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: rake/Illinois Jurisdiction: Fort Collins ]nits: U. S. Customary knalysis Year: short lon bkgrd total Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Drake Vorth/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 440 100 20 700 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 488 ill 22 777 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Movement 7 L Northbound 8 9 T R Southbound 1 10 11 12 I L T R Volume 20 60 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 66 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I R I R v (vph) 22 22 66 C(m) (vph) 978 539 395 v/c 0.02 0.04 0.17 95% queue length 0.07 0.13 0.59 Control Delay 8.8 12.0 15.9 LOS A B C Approach Delay 12.0 15.9 Approach LOS B C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1m APPENDIX H ,5 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Cus er/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short ong total Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Custer North/South Street: RT-in/RT-out Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 250 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 277 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 Configuration TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration A 0.90 155 2 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v tvpni 155 C(m) (vph) 751 v/c 0.21 95% queue length 0.77 Control Delay 11.0 LOS B Approach Delay 11.0 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1M 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: Michael Iency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. i to Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm tersection: uster/RT-in/RT-out risdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short QEg total r oject ID: 0189 st/West Street: Custer North/South Street: RT-in/RT-out t tersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 IL T R I L T R Volume 320 10 feak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 'urly Flow Rate, HFR 355 11 ircent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided T Channelized? anes 1 0 onfiguration TR Upstream Signal? No No Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R olume eak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR teercent Heavy Vehicles rcent Grade M ' Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage T Channelized? Lanes ,Qonfiguration 0 0 1 R 0.90 27 2 No I i ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound ipproach ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 R ane Config I I R (vph) " 684 (m) (vph) i 0.04 /c 95% queue length 0.12 ontrol Delay 10.5 B lops pproach Delay 10.5 Approach LOS B ,■ Matthew J. iatthew J. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Delich Delich, P.E. 15 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/3 01 Analysis Time Period: anfp5V Intersection: Ti erline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short ong otal Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 1630 90 0.90 0.90 1811 100 No 2 1 T R Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 235 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 261 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service , Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I , v (vph) 261 C(m) (vph) 700 v/c 0.37 95% queue length 1.73 Control Delay 13.2 LOS B Approach Delay 13.2 Approach LOS B 63 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a - Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. �y 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: Michael ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 12 31/01 Analysis Time Period: Opm Mntersection: Timberline/RT-in/RT-out risdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short ong tota toject ID: 0189 st/West Street: RT-out-out orth/South Street: Timberline Intersection tersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ' Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1730 30 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 " urly Flow Rate, HFR 1922 33 ; rcent Heavy Vehicles -- -- Median Type Undivided T Channelized? No anes 2 1 onfiguration T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Al 'nor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound _ Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 4, '.o1ume 60 eak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 66 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 rcent Grade (%) 0 0 edian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage IT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Lonfiguration R 'J Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach NB SB Westbound Eastbound vement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ne Config I R I (vph) 66 (m) (vph) 669 /c 0.10 95% queue length 0.33 ntrol Delay 11.0 S B proach Delay 11.0 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a - Matthew J. Delich Matthew tthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: m Intersection: s er/Illinois Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgrd tota Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Custer North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 140 300 15 5 225 40 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 155 333 16 5 250 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config 5 1 5 50 1 40 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 5 1 5 55 1 44 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 155 5 11 100 C(m) (vph) 1268 1210 303 320 v/c 0.12 0.00 0.04 0.31 95% queue length 0.42 0.01 0.11 1.30 Control Delay 8.2 8.0 17.3 21.3 LOS A A C C Approach Delay 17.3 21.3 Approach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 10 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY (alyst: Michael ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. te Performed: 12 31/01 Analysis Time Period: am m ttersection: uster/Illinois risdiction: Fort Collins its: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short ong bkgrd otal oject ID: 0189 st/West Street: Custer orth/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 TIVehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 `12 L T R I L T R " Volume 35 125 5 5 290 20 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 teak urly Flow Rate, HFR 38 138 5 5 322 22 ( rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided T Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 nfiguration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Am 'nor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R fume eak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR rcent Heavy Vehicles tedian rcent Grade (%) Storage Flared Approach: Exists? tan Storage Channelized?es Configuration 15 1 5LU I LS 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 16 1 5 22 1 27 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No 0 1 0 LTR No 0 1 0 LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach EB WB Northbound Southbound Ivement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ne Config L L I LTR I LTR J (vph) 38 5 22 50 (m) (vph) 1215 1440 461 540 /c 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.09 95% queue length 0.10 0.01 0.15 0.30 ntrol Delay 8.1 7.5 13.2 12.3 0 S A A B B proach Delay 13.2 12.3 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a latthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. I A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: amlllm Intersection: Dra a/Illinois Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short ong bkgrd total Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 635 225 35 610 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 705 250 38 677 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 55 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 61 33 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I R I R v tvpn) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 720 370 451 0.05 0.16 0.07 0.17 0.58 0.24 10.3 16.6 13.6 B C B 16.6 13.6 C B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1■ :i HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY talyst: Michael enc/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. te Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: rake/Illinois urisdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short lon bkgrd total roject ID: 0189 ast/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Vehicle Volumes and Major Street: Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T Study period (hrs): 0.25 Adjustments Westbound 3 1 4 5 6 R I L T R -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 leak ourly Flow Rate, HFR 488 111 22 777 5 yercent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided T Channelized? nes 1 0 1 1 0 onfiguration TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R olume 20 60 i eak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 66 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 rcent Grade (%) 0 0 edian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 ,.Qonfiguration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach EB '• vement 1 tone Config WB 4 1 L I Northbound 7 8 9 1 R I Southbound 10 11 12 R (vph) 22 22 66 (m) (vph) 978 539 395 /c 0.02 0.04 0.17 95% queue length 0.07 0.13 0.59 ntrol Delay 8.8 12.0 15.9 S A B C proach Delay 12.0 15.9 Approach LOS AN B C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. i �1 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 468 1672 0.07 0.28 26.5 C 26.5 C Westbound L 402 1386 0.79 0.29 42.8 D TR 451 1610 0.26 0.28 28.3 C 38.9 D Northbound L 234 1770 0.11 0.63 19.8 B T 1982 3539 0.84 0.56 22.9 C 19.7 B R 1409 1583 0.20 0.89 0.8 A Southbound L 234 1770 0.81 0.63 45.3 D TR 1980 3536 0.93 0.56 29.6 C 31.1 C Intersection Delay = 26.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0189 Custer Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11/17/00 am m Ti erline/Custer All other areas Fort Collins recent short on bkgrd total East/West Street North/South Street Timberline W if HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a alyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Custer ency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas ADate: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Year Fort Collins recent short long bkgrd total am® Igriod: oject ID: 0189 4E/W St: Custer N/S St: Timberline �jI SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I L T R I I I Southbound L T R �o. Lanes I 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L T R I L TR 'lume 15 10 15 1285 10 95 125 1620 270 1175 1685 10 ne Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 tion 0.25 Combination 1 ease Left A Thru A Right A Peds X Left A Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right A Right een 28.0 Yellow 3.0 11 Red 2.0 i 1 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 2 3 4 I 1 NB Left 1 Thru Right 1 Peds 1 SB Left 1 Thru Right 1 Peds 1 EB Right WB Right 5 6 A P P P X A P P P X 7 8 6.0 56.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Ei n Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary__ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate _ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 413 1589 0.09 Westbound L 373 1381 0.64 TR 415 1595 0.35 Northbound L 233 1770 0.05 T 2053 3539 0.86 R 1409 1583 0.07 Southbound L 233 1770 0.31 TR 2051 3537 0.87 Intersection Delay = 23.4 0.26 28.2 C 0.27 35.9 D 0.26 30.6 C 0.65 17.0 0.58 22.6 0.89 0.7 0.65 18.4 0.58 23.3 (sec/veh) Approach Delay LOS 28.2 C 33.9 C 21.4 C C 23.1 C Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0189 Custer OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11/17/00 am pm imberline/Custer All other areas Fort Collins recent short on bkgrd tota East/West Street North/South Street Timberline y4 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a �,nalyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Custer gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas .f Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins iferiod: %'ink pm Year recent short ong bkgrd tom 1 roject D: 0189 E/W St: Custer N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Sou bound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 o. Lanes 1 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L T R I L TR I jolume 110 5 20 1215 5 125 110 1625 95 165 1605 5 I ane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I I----------------- uration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations __ __ l hase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 �B Left A 1 NB Left A P ' Thru A I Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X B Left A I SB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P ! Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right IB Right I WB Right reen 26.0 6.0 58.0 " Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Ill Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 43 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate _ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 412 3433 0.96 T 849 3539 0.52 R 760 1583 0.70 Westbound L 320 1770 0.38 TR 636 3349 0.93 Northbound L 687 3433 0.86 T 1663 3539 0.78 R 918 1583 0.15 Southbound L 410 1770 0.91 T 1451 3539 0.98 R 902 1583 0.52 .Intersection Delay = 39.8 Approach Delay LOS 0.12 76.9 E 0.24 33.6 C 42.0 D 0.48 23.3 C 0.27 29.4 C 0.19 59.5 E 54.4 D 0.20 49.6 D 0.47 24.7 C 30.9 C 0.58 9.7 A 0.56 51.1 D 0.41 48.4 D 41.7 D 0.57 13.6 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0189 Drake OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS__ Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11/17/00 am(�& Timberline/Drake All other areas Fort Collins recent short long bkgrd total East/West Street North/South Street Timberline lot HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a 11 nalyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins �eriod: am Year recent short long bkgrd tota roject ID: 0189 E/W St: Drake N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I L T R o. Lanes 1 2 2 1 I 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R Volume 1355 400 480 1110 340 190 1545 1195 125 ane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 ration 0.25 hase Combination 1 B Left A Thru Right 1� Peds B Left A Thru Right Peds NB Right A JB Right A reen 6.0 Yellow 0.0 f11 Red 0.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 2 3 4 1 A I NB Left A A 1 Thru A A I Right X I Peds A I SB Left A I Thru A I Right x I Peds EB Right A I WB Right 5.0 19.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 I Southbound I L T R I I 1 1 2 1 L T R 1335 1280 420 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 7 8 A A A P A P X A P P P X 13.0 6.0 41.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs I 0 Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound Approach Delay LOS L 584 3433 0.89 0.17 56.6 E T 1132 3539 0.28 0.32 25.5 C 35.3 D R 807 1583 0.67 0.51 20.5 C Westbound L 400 1770 0.43 0.30 27.9 C TR 731 3324 0.92 0.22 54.9 D 49.4 D Northbound L 515 3433 0.94 0.15 67.5 E T 1628 3539 0.85 0.46 28.5 C 37.5 D R, 902 1583 0.08 0.57 9.8 A Southbound L 286 1770 0.62 0.46 .24.4 C T 1345 3539 0.76 0.38 31.1 C 26.0 C R 934 1583 0.34 0.59 10.7 B Intersection Delay = 35.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0189 Drake OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11/17/00 0pm berline/Drake All other areas Fort Collins recent short ong bkgrd otal East/West Street North/South Street Timberline HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a nalyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 1Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins # eriod: O pm Year recent short long bkgrd total i roject ID: 0189 E/W St: Drake N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I L T R o. Lanes 1 2 2 1 ( 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R `Jolume 1490 295 510 1155 360 245 1445 1275 70 ane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 ation 0.25 Combination 1 jhase B Left A Thru Right Peds B Left A Thru i�Right Peds NB Right A B Right A ' reen 6.0 Yellow 0.0 1�11 Red 0.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations__ 2 3 4 I A 1 NB Left A A I Thru A A 1 Right X I Peds A I SB Left A I Thru A I Right x I Peds EB Right A 1 WB Right Southbound L T R I 1 1 2 1 L T R 1175 1010 310 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 7 8 A A A P A P X A P P P X A A 10.0 22.0 6.0 8.0 38.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs APPENDIX G HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I alyst: Michael tency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. tte Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm I ntersection: Cus er/RT-in/RT-out urisdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long total roject ID: 0189 ast/West Street: Custer North/South Street: RT-in/RT-out intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound. Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 215 15 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 252 17 ,j ercent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided lT Channelized? anes 1 0 onfiguration TR Upstream Signal? No No i minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 13 Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R lume o t140 eak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 164 Heavy Vehicles 2 ;ercent ercent Grade M 0 0 ' Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage T Channelized? No " Lanes 1 -Confiquration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ane Config I I R (vph) 164 A(m) (vph) 779 /c 0.21 95% queue length 0.79 Aontrol Delay 10.8 os B pproach Delay 10.8 Approach LOS B I� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich 'Jatthew J. Delich, P.E. _1 5-� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: ulster/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: hort long otal Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Custer North/South Street: RT-in/RT-out Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 275 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 323 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 Configuration TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 29 C(m) (vph) 715 v/c 0.04 95% queue length 0.13 Control Delay 10.2 LOS B Approach Delay 10.2 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 56 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ]analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. tnte Performed: 12/31/01 alysis Time Period: am �Sm; tersection: Ti rline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary alysis Year: shor long total ,tits, ID: 0189 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out Jorth/South Street: Timberline ntersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound S Movement 1 2 3 ( 4 5 6 L T R I L T R olume 1335 90 eak-Hour Factor, PHF J 0.85 0.85 curly Flow Rate, HFR 1570 105 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -' Type Undivided jmedian T Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 Configuration T R pstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 250 Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 ,`leak curly Flow Rate, HFR 294 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 edian Storage ? lared Approach: Exists? ` Storage RT Channelized? No 1 lanes } onfiguration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service " pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I (vph) 294 (m) (vph) 825 v/c 0.36 5% queue length 1.62 ontrol Delay 11.8 OS B Approach Delay 11.8 pproach LOS :i B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ,atthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 5� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: imberline/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long tota Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 0.85 0.85 1705 35 No 2 1 T R Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0.85 76 2 0 No 1 R A Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I v (vph) 76 C(m) (vph) 792 v/c 0.10 95% queue length 0.32 Control Delay 10.0+ LOS B Approach Delay 10.0+ Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Jk ]I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY talyst: Michael :ncy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. te Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am �tersection: Cus /Illinois aner J urisdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary alysis Year: short long bkgrd total oject ID: 0189 st/West Street: Custer North/South Street: Illinois ttersection Orientation: EW Vehicle Volumes and Major Street: Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 Study period (hrs): 0.25 Adjustments Westbound 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R t Volume 125 280 200 20 Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 �eak-Hour ourly Flow Rate, HFR 147 329 235 23 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL Channelized? anes JT 1 1 1 0 onfiguration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R plume eak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ercent Heavy Vehicles ercent Grade M ' Median Storage 1 Tared Approach: Exists? 1 Storage T Channelized? ' Lanes -Confiauration 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level pproach EB WB Northbound ` ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 ane Config L I (vph) 147 (m) (vph) I 1307 /C 0.11 95% queue length 0.38 ontrol Delay 8.1 jIOS A pproach Delay Approach LOS 0.85 35 2 N 0.85 35 2 0 No 0 LR of Service Southbound 1 10 11 12 1 LR (� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a A Matthew J. Delich fatthew J. Delich, P.E. I 5';1 520 0.13 0.46 13.0 B 13.0 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: (Ester/Illinois Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Custer North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 30 105 270 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 123 317 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 10 10 0.85 0.85 11 11 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 35 22 C(m) (vph) 1232 643 v/c 0.03 0.03 95% queue length 0.09 0.11 Control Delay 8.0 10.8 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.8 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 51, HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY a alyst: Michael jlate ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 12/31/O1 Analysis Time Period: am pm tersection: Dra a/Illinois urisdiction: Fort Collins J nits: U. S. Customary Ana�.lysis Year: short long bkgrd total roject ID: 0189 st/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Illinois ttersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 '1. L T R I L T R Volume 490 220 35 460 5 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 ,leak :ourly Flow Rate, HFR 576 258 41 541 5- 4ercent" Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type Undivided T Channelized? 1 0 1 1 0 'anes o .. nfiguration TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No I §inor Street: Approach Movement Northbound 7 8 L T 9 R Southbound I 10 11 I L T 12 R olume 30 30 eak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 35 lercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 ercent Grade M 0 0 ' Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? + Storage T Channelized? No No ' Lanes 1 1 ,Qonfiguration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1pproach ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ane Config L I R I R 41 35 35 �(vph) (m) (vph) 799 436 539 /c 0.05 0.08 0.06 95% queue length 0.16 0.26 0.21 ntrol Delay 9.7 14.0 12.1 t OS A B B i pproach Delay 14.0 12.1 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a 'Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 6i HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 1/31/O1 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: rake/Illinois Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: hort long bkgrd total Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) Major Street Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 L T R I L Westbound 5 6 T R 0.25 Volume 335 90 20 530 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 394 .105 23 623 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0.85 11 2 0 No 1 R 60 0.85 70 2 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I R I R v (vph) 23 11 70 C(m) (vph) 1065 612 484 v/c 0.02 0.02 0.14 95% queue length 0.07 0.05 0.50 Control Delay 8.5 11.0 13.7 LOS A B B Approach Delay 11.0 13.7 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. f Intersection Performance ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach I ane Group Flow Rate + Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS astbound ATR 432 estbound 1601 0.06 0.27 27.1 C 27.1 C '391 1397 0.81 0.28 46.0 D R 428 1586 0.24 0.27 28.7 C 41.8 D Northbound 11 233 1770 0.11 0.64 12.7 B j 2017 3539 0.68 0.57 17.0 B 14.5 B R 1409 1583 0.18 0.89 0.8 A 11outhbound 254 1770 0.69 0.64 22.8 C TR 2015 .3535 0.74 0.57 18.4 B 18.9 B. Intersection Delay = 19.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B tHCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release<4.1a ' ffatthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. i 272 Glen Haven Drive ,Loveland, CO 80538 hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com-- - - x OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 3 Analyst: Michael gency/Co.: Matthew. J. Delich, P.E. =ate Performed: 11/17/00. Analysis Time Period: am ntersection: Ti erline/Custer rea Type: All other areas urisdiction: Fort Collins nalysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd tota roject ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline I� .. ki HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 11/17/00 Period: am Project ID: 189 E/W St: Custer I Eastbound L T R I No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 LGConfig I LTR Volume 15 1 15 Lane Width I 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right A SB Right Green 27.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 Inter.: Timberline/Custer Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent short long bkgrd total N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 L TR I L T R I L TR 1270 1 85 125 1335 245 1160 1360 10 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 I I NB Left Thru I Right I Peds I SB Left I Thru 1 Right 1 Peds I EB Right 1 WB Right 5 6 A P P P X A P P P X 7 8 6.0 57.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 11/17/00 Period: pm Projectm 0189 E/W St: Custer Inter.: Timberline/Custer Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent hort long bkgr otal, N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L T R I L TR Volume 110 1 20 1190 1 110 110 1360 85 150 1295 5 Lane Width I 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right A SB Right Green 26.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 1 1 NB Left I Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 1 SB Left 1 Thru Right I Peds 1 EB Right I WB Right 5 6 A P P P X A P P P X I Southbound 1 L T R 7 8 6.0 58.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 414 ) Intersection Performance Summary_ j, ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group �ane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS astbound L 446 3433 0.86 0.13 57.7 E 920 3539 0.45 0.26 31.4 C 35.7 D 744 1583 0.58 0.47 20.6 C estbound 351 1770 0.23 0.28 27.5 C #R 671 3356 0.74 0.20 41.8 D 39.8 D Northbound 584 3433 0.91 0.17 59.6 E 1770 3539 0.63 0.50 18.9 B 31.0 C R 966 1583 0.08 0.61 8.1 A louthbound 368 1770 0.89 0.52 41.0 D J T 1486 3539 0.86 0.42 33.2 C 29.9 C 934 1583 0.47 0.59 12.0 B Intersection Delay = 32.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a atthew J. Delich '14atthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 `hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS _ ` Analyst: Michael gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 'ate Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am 'Timberline/Drake Antersection: rea Type: All other areas urisdiction: Fort Coll' s fralysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd6i) oject ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Street Drake Timberline HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, Date: 11/17/00 Period: am Project ID: 0189 E/W St: Drake Inter.: Timberline/Drake P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent hort long bkgrd total , N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound L T R i L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R No. Lanes 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 I 2 1 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R Volume 1325 355 370 170 275 145 1490 1020 75 1280 1090 370 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A A I NB Left Thru A A 1 Thru Right A A 1 Right Peds X I Peds WB Left A A I SB Left Thru A 1 Thru Right A I Right Peds X I Peds NB Right A 1 EB Right SB Right A A I WB Right Green 6.0 6.0 20.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 5 6 7 8 A A A P A P X A P P P X A A 8.0 8.0 42.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 0 Intersection Performance Summary k pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS astbound J L 549 3433 0.81 0.16 49.8 D 1097 3539 0.24 0.31 25.9 C 32.2 C 792 1583 0.55 0.50 18.1 B Westbound 1770 0.32 0.30 26.9 C IR409 732 3329 0.77 0.22 41.7 D 39.0 D " Northbound 515 3433 0.80 0.15 50.0 D ! 1663 3539 0.72 0.47 22.7 C 29.2 C R 918 1583 0.05 0.58 9.1 A -��outhbound 3 290 1770 0.47 0.47 18.6 B wi T 1380 3539 0.61 0.39 26.4 C 22.0 C 934 1583 0.29 0.59 10.3 B j.� Intersection Delay = 29.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C rHCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a latthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive 'oveland, CO 80538 hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS (970) 669-5034 Analyst: Michael gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. `ate Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am pm ntersection: Timberline/Drake rea Type: All other areas urisdiction: Fort Collins nalysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd total 4roject ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Drake Timberline Street " A3 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: 11/17/00 pm Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent shor long bkgr otal, Project ID: 0189 E/W St: Drake N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY____ _ I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L i i I T R I I No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 LGConfig i L T R Volume 1420 250 410 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 _1_2 0 i 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 L TR I L T R I L T R 1110 290 190 1380 1095 40 1135 830 270 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A A 1 Thru A P Right A A 1 Right A P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right A A SB Right A A 1 WB Right Green 6.0 9.0 22.0 6.0 8.0 39.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 1L ]l APPENDIX F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12o/01 Analysis Time Period: amIntersection: Cur/Illinois Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short on bcgrd total Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Custer North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 300 15 5 205 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 333 16 5 227 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2-- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 5 1 5 5 1 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1 5 5 1 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 16 5 11 17 C(m) (vph) 1329 1210 489 589 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 95% queue length 0.04 0.01 0.07 0.09 Control Delay 7.7 8.0 12.5 11.3 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 12.5 11.3 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 40 11 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY %g:l: Michael nc;t1Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: mpm ntersection: (Ulster/Illinois urisdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgrd total Itroject ID: 0189 ast/West Street: Custer North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 120 5 5 28U 5 Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 133 5 5 311 5 i�eak-Hour ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- ` Median Type Undivided T Channelized? anes 1 1 0 1 1 0 onfiguration L TR L TR ,# Upstream Signal? No No Street: Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R �olume eak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ercent Heavy Vehicles ! ercent Grade M edian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage T Channelized? " Lanes f,onfiguration 15 1 5 5 1 15 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 16 1 5 5 1 16 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound movement 1 4 17 8 9 1 10 11 12 JM,ane Config L L I LTR I LTR (vph) 5 5 22 22 (m) (vph) 1244 1446 541 644 /c 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 Delay 7.9 7.5 11.9 10.8 ��ontrol ;OS A A B B pproach Delay 11.9 10.8 Approach LOS B B if HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. a HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Drake/Illinois Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short Con bkgr total Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 635 25 610 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 705 27 677 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 0 Configuration TR TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0.90 27 2 0 No 1 R 0.90 33 2 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I R v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay 14.0 Approach LOS B 429 451 0.06 0.07 0.20 0.24 14.0 13.6 B B 13.6 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Ialyst: Michael ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. to Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am m tersection: rake/Illinois risdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long kgrd otal oject ID: 0189 st/West Street: Drake forth/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 440 2U /UU 5 ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 urly Flow Rate, HFR 488 22 777 5 rcent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided Channelized? j i nes 1 0 1 0 nfiguration TR TR Upstream Signal? No No ilnor Street: Approach j Movement Northbound 7 8 L T 9 R Southbound I 10 11 I L T 12 R 10 60 Rlume eak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 66 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 rcent Grade M 0 0 edian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage Channelized? 'lanes No No 1 1 ,Qpnfiguration R R " Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 1.1ne Config I R I R 11 66 �(vph) (m) (vph) 572 395 c 0.02 0.17 95% queue length 0.06 0.59 Delay 11.4 15.9 SB C tIntrol proach Delay 11.4 15.9 Approach LOS B C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a (Matthew J. Delich M tthew J. Delich, P.E. 1 �1 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 400 1667 0.09 0.24 29.6 C 29.6 C Westbound L 347 1389 0.37 0.25 31.6 C TR 386 1610 0.30 0.24 31.6 C 31.6 C Northbound L 233 1770 0.11 0.67 20.1 C T 2123 3539 0.78 0.60 18.1 B 16.3 B R 1409 1583 0.14 0.89 0.7 A Southbound L 233 1770 0.58 0.67 22.2 C TR 2122 3536 0.92 0.60 25.8 C 25.5 C Intersection Delay = 21.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS _ Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Timberline/Custer Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short long bkgr total Project ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline yio IHCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a nalyst: Michael gency: Matthew J Date: 11/1/00 feriod: ampm` roject ID: 0189 E/W St: Custer Inter.: Timberline/Custer Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent short on bkgrd total N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY— Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Ito. — — I ---— I --------- Lanes 1 0 1 0 I 1 1-0 I 1 2 1 LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L T R "Volume 15 10 15 1115 10 95 125 1615 195 ane Width i 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 ]IFuration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations__ hase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 I B Left A I NB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right I Peds X I Peds B Left A I SB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right _' Peds X I Peds NB Right A I EB Right J 'B Right I WB Right ' reen 24.0 Yellow 3.0 11 Red i 2.0 i� i� A A P P P X P P P X I Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 1125 1785 10 112.0 12.0 1 0 7 6.0 60.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary_______ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound ---- --------------- LTR 413 1589 0.09 0.26 28.2 C 28.2 C Westbound L 373 1381 0.54 0.27 32.7 C TR 415 1595 0.35 0.26 30.6 C 31.8 C Northbound L 233 1770 0.05 0.65 17.4 B T 2053 3539 0.85 0.58 22.2 C 21.3 C R 1409 1583 0.05 0.89 0.7 A Southbound L 233 1770 0.26 0.65 17.7 B TR 2051 3537 0.88 0.58 23.9 C 23.7 C Intersection Delay = 23.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0189 Custer Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11/17/00 am pm Timberline/Custer All other areas Fort Collins recent short on bkgrd total East/West Street North/South Street Timberline HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Inalyst• Michael Inter.: Timberline/Custer gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: /17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins 'feriod• am on pm Year recent short bkgrd total roject D• 0189 E/W St: Custer N/S St: Timberline ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_—_—_______ Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1--------1 -- I —------- I --- ---—----------- o. Lanes I 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L T R I L TR I olume I10 5 20 1180 5 125 I10 1610 70 155 1620 5 I jane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I ration 0.25 Combination 1 1hase B Left A Thru A Right A AB Peds X Left A Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right A tB Right reen 26.0 Yellow 3.0 ,t11 Red 2.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations__ —2 -_-3 4 1 1 NB Left 1 Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 1 SB Left Thru Right 1 Peds 1 EB Right 1 WB Right 5 6 A P P P X A P P P X 7 8 6.0 58.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 1' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a 11nalyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins am� Year recent short kgrd total lon 'I�eriod: roject ID: 0189 `'E/W St: Drake N/S St: Timberline ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I L T R � I I Igo. Lanes 1 2 2 11 1 2 0 I 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R jolume 1355 310 480 1110 340 190 1455 1135 125 ane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 hase Combination 1 B Left A ' Thru ? Right Peds ,i B Left A Thru I' Right Peds NB Right A :JB Right A reen 6.0 Yellow 0.0 f�11 4 Red 0.0 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations__ 2 3 4 I A 1 NB Left A A I Thru A A I Right X I Peds A I SB Left A I Thru A 1 Right X I Peds 1 EB Right A I WB Right 6.0 20.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Southbound L T R 1 1 2 1 I L T R 1225 1330 420 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 7 8 A A A P A P A P P P X A A 6.0 8.0 44.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs y Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS Eastbound L 584 3433 0.89 0.17 56.6 E T 1132 3539 0.23 0.32 25.1 C 35.5 D R 807 1583 0.67 0.51 20.5 C Westbound L 409 1770 0.42 0.30 27.8 C TR 731 3324 0.92 0.22 54.9 D 49.4 D Northbound L 515 3433 0.89 0.15 58.7 E T 1628 3539 0.84 0.46 27.8 C 34.5 C R 902 1583 0.08 0.57 9.8 A Southbound L 286 1770 0.49 0.46 20.9 C T 1345 3539 0.76 0.38 31.2 C 25.9 C R 934 1583 0.34 0.59 10.7 B Intersection Delay = 34.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0189 Drake OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11/17/00 a m ierline/Drake All other areas Fort Collins recent short on bkgr total East/West Street North/South Street Timberline 410 11 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a 11nalyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins jeriod: g� pm Year recent short long bkgr total roject ID: 0189 E/W St: Drake N/S St: Timberline ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 o. Lanes i 2 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 I 1 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R I ';�olume 1490 250 510 1155 360 245 1420 1255 70 1140 1015 310 I j ane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0.12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 f— -- — uration 0.25 Area e : All Type: All other ------ areas ----------- — Signal Operations --------------------- Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 �hase B Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A A I Thru A P Right A A 1 Right A P ;� Peds X 1 Peds X -' B Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right A A 11B Right A A I WB Right reen 6.0 10.0 22.0 6.0 8.0 38.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 r�11 Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 J' i a itJ secs ,1 tiR APPENDIX E A 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 't:lyst: Michael ncy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. te Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: am m 3tersection: Dra a/Illinois i risdiction: Fort Collins nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: or long EEd total 'roject ID: 0189 ast/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 10 L T R .1 L T R Volume 46U b � eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 541 5 :J ercent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided AT Channelized? anes 1 0 onfiguration TR Upstream Signal? No No ,Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound i Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R olume 30 eak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 Jercent Heavy Vehicles 2 ercent Grade M 0 0 edian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? i Storage T Channelized? No " Lanes 1 .Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ,Ipproach EB WB Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ane Config I I R I(vph) 35 (m) (vph) 539 /c 0.06 95% queue length 0.21 fiontrol Delay 12.1 OS B pproach Delay 12.1 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. i 4 2 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/31/01 Analysis Time Period: Pm Intersection: ISrake/Illinois Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long kgrd otal Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Illinois Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 L T R I L Westbound 5 6 T R Volume bju b Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 623 5 '`Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Cha_nnelized? Lanes 1 0 Configuration TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 60 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 70 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade ($) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (,vph) 70 C(m) (vph) 484 v/c 0.14 95% queue length 0.50 Control Delay 13.7 LOS B Approach Delay 13.7 Approach LOS B BCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Z, Intersection Performance Summary_ _ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ` Ippr/ ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS astbound 416 1600 0.06 0.26 27.9 C 27.9 C ATR estbound 377 1398 0.31 0.27 29.6 C IR 412 1586 0.25 0.26 29.6 C 29.6 C Northbound 41 233 1770 0.11 0.65 13.7 B 2053 3539 0.67 0.58 16.1 B 14.3 B R 1409 1583 0.12 0.89 0.7 A jouthbound 263 1770 0.46 0.65 13.6 B 2051 3536 0.78 0.58 19.1 B 18.7 B fTR 7, Intersection Delay = 17.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a atthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 1272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 `hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1gency/Co.: ate Performed: 11/17/00 ' Analysis Time Period: am�p� ntersection: Tim e'rline/Custer rea Type: All other areas urisdiction: Fort Collins nalysis Year: recent shor long kgr total �roject ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline E' �1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, Date: 11/17/00 Period: am Project ID: 0189 E/W St: Custer I Eastbound L T R I No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 LGConfig I LTR Volume 15 1 15 Lane Width 1 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right A SB Right Green 26.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 Inter.: Timberline/Custer P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent shor long kgrd total N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I 1 1 0 L TR I100 1 85 112.0 12.0 1 0 I 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 L T R I L TR 125 1325 170 1110 1460 10 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 1 0 Area Type: All other areas .Signal Operations 2 3 4 1 1 NB Left 1 Thru 1 Right I Peds 1 SB Left 1 Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 1 EB Right 1 WB Right 5 6 A P P P X A P P P X 7 6.0 58.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 1h 11 Intersection Performance Summary__ ] pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Mane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS :1 stbound 404 1554 0.09 0.26 28.1 (TR estbound 374 1384 0.49 0.27 31.7 412 1585 0.32 0.26 30.3 Northbound .1 233 1770 0.05 0.65 12.5 2053 3539 0.71 0.58 17.2 tit R 1409 1583 0.05 0.89 0.6 10uthbound 242 1770 0.19 0.65 12.4 TR 2051 3537 0.75 0.58 18.3 Intersection Delay = 18.6 (sec/veh) Approach Delay LOS C 28.1 C C C 31.1 C B B 16.4 B A B B 18.1 B Intersection LOS = B IHCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich jatthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Jhone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 'Analyst: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. rgency/Co.: ate Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: a pm imberline/Custer tutersection: ea Type: All other areas risdiction: nalysis Year: Fort Col s recent shor lon bkgr total iroject ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline I .a r �ppr/ Lane ane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary__ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS astbound J L 481 3433 0.79 991 3539 0.29 794 1583 0.58 estbound 394 1770 0.21 'IR 705 3356 0.70 Northbound 515 3433 0.80 1770 3539 0.59 R 966 1583 0.08 jouthbound 350 .1770 0.57 ` T 1486 3539 0.90 j 950 1583 0.46 Intersection Delay = 30.0 Approach Delay LOS 0.14 50.5 D 0.28 28.4 C 33.0 C 0.47 20.6 C 0.29 26.7 C 0.21 39.7 D 37.9 D 0.15 50.0 D 0.50 18.2 B 26.2 C 0.61 8.1 A 0.50 17.3 B 0.42 36.3 D 28.9 C 0.60 11.4 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a } Matthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 #hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS i Analyst: Michael ifgency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 11/�17/00 nalysis Time Period: am �V tntersection: Timberline/Drake rea Type: All other areas urisdiction: Fort Collins nalysis Year: recent short long bkgr total iroject ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Street Drake Timberline ' 2\ HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Co�h�®rs Period: am pr Year recentlong kgrd total Project ID: 0189 E/W St: Drake N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY__ __ I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound ► Southbound I 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 ► 1 2 0 I 2 2 1 ► 1 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R► Volume 1325 245 370 170 275 145 1380 960 75 1170 1140 370 ► Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations___ _ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4► 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A A I Thru A P Right A A 1 Right A P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A i Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right A A SB Right A A I WB Right Green 6.0 7.0 21.0 6.0 8.0 42.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs to 11 Intersection Performance Summary_ ?� a ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS j`astbound L 549 3433 0.81 0.16 49.8 D 1132 3539 0.18 0.32 24.6 C 32.3 C 792 1583 0.55 0.50 18.1 B estbound 432 1770 0.30 0.31 26.1 C IR 766 3329 0.74 0.23 39.5 D 37.0 D Northbound 481 3433 0.79 0.14 50.3 D 1628 3539 0.72 0.46 23.3 C 29.4 C R 902 1583 0.05 0.57 9.5 A louthbound 289 1770 0.35 0.47 17.7 B T 1380 3539 0.61 0.39 26.4 C 22.1 C 934 1583 0.29 0.59 10.3 B Intersection Delay = 29.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich fatthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 11hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS i (970) 669-5034 Analyst: Michael jgency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: � pm Antersection: Timberline/Drake rea Type: All other areas urisdiction: Fort Col ins nalysis Year: short long bkgr total roject ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Street Drake Timberline ii ' 6 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: 9 pm Year recent short longkgrd total Project ID: 0189 E/W St: Drake N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 1 I 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1420 195 410 1350 1075 40 I100 835 270 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left A Thru Right Peds NB Right A SB Right A Green 6.0 Yellow 0.0 All Red 0.0 I 2 0 I L TR 1110 290 190 112.0 12.0 I 0 Area Type: All other areas _ _Signal Operations__ 2 3 4 I A 1 NB Left A A 1 Thru A A 1 Right X 1 Peds A I SB Left A I Thru A I Right X 1 Peds 1 EB Right A 1 WB Right 9.0 23.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Southbound L T R 5 6 7 8 A A A P A P X A P P P X A A 6.0 7.0 39.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs \00 11 APPENDIX D EI A n ,o A�f-Z(�SvPN 6 PM /85 VPH m m w 0 FIGURE 45. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT CL 600 2 F- v 500 wQ w a 400 �a Q 300 zg .J > lo0 400 600 800 MAJOR STREET 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LAN OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LAN 1000 1200 1400 1600 11 TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH "NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. SNORT PM&E C3ACX6RauN® �,,)�{2.ier4A)T- A TiA18E#cun1E �'^-^I- � � ':..._III- �I...___ -AM`___ �..._M ! r r i R t. t.:.� 5..:vI� i-�--� �.;� � L"_ '--_ 1' I' u '1 �1 APPENDIX C �1 N7 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sedveh A <10 B >10and<15 C > 15 and << 25 D > 25 and < 35 E > 35 and < 50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay seelveh A _< 10 B > 10and<20 C > 20 and _< 35 D > 35 and _< 55 E > 55 and _< 80 F > 80 Nk HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: Michael ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, to Performed: 12/28/01 Analysis Time Period: am ®m tersection: Timberline/Custer risdiction: Fort Collins its: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecent' oject ID: 0189 st/West Street: Custer North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Vehicle Volumes and ' Major Street: Approach Northbound Movement 1 2 in L T P.E. Study period (hrs): 0.25 Adjustments Southbound 3 I 4 5 6 R I L T R eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 urly Flow Rate, HFR 20 956 9- 3 1222 6- rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Raised curb Channelized? No ET nes 1 2 1 1 2 0 " nfiguration L T R L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Im I linor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R lume eak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR rcent Heavy Vehicles rcent Grade (�) edian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage Ir Channelized? ' Lanes configuration proach jIvement ne Config lU U b 1 U lU 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 11 0 7 2 0 11 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Yes 1 1 1 0 L TR Yes 1 0 1 0 LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L L I L TR I LTR (vph) 20 3 11 7 13 (m) (vph) 563 709 171 671 719 /c 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.11 0.01 0.20 0.03 0.06 Delay 11.6 10.1 27.5 10.4 10.1 14ntrol S B B D B B proach Delay 20.9 10.1 Approach LOS C B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a i Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 05 f1l.JLV V V V11511�11n114CLL 1ul.c1JG\. �.a V1iJ i�GaGnJG z �u TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/28/01 Analysis Time Period. am pm Intersection: Timberline/Custer Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen Project ID: 0189 East/West Street: Custer North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume S lull i/ .i yly L Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1164 18 3 1081 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration L T R L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 0 1 5 0 19 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 1 5 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I LTR v (vph) 5 3 5 1 27 C(m) (vph) 640 587 149 456 789 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.01 0.11 Control Delay 10.7 11.2 30.0 12.9 9.7 LOS B B D B A Approach Delay 27.2 9.7 Approach LOS D A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11 jpr/ Lane ne Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS §astbound L 240 3433 0.62 0.07 49.9 D 849 3539 0.07 0.24 29.4 C 30.9 C 649 1583 0.52 0.41 22.9 C estbound 386 1770 0.02 0.31 24.1 C 813 3388 0.28 0.24 31.1 C 30.8 C Northbound 446 3433 0.75 0.13 48.7 D 1911 3539 0.35 0.54 13.2 B 24.8 C R 1029 1583 0.01 0.65 6.2 A jouthbound 517 1770 0.05 0.56 9.9 A " T 1699 3539 0.57 0.48 20.0+ C 17.8 B 934 1583 0.28 0.59 10.2 B 'tr Intersection Delay = 23.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C j' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a 1 ! 1atthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 `,hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS i a (970) 669-5034 'Analyst: Michael gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 11/�17--�/00 nalysis Time Period: am Om Timberline/Drake Antersection: rea Type: All other areas urisdiction: Fo Collins nalysis Year: ',liroject ID: 0189 recen short long bkgrd total Drake East/West Street North/South Street Timberline i HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am ® Year reeen short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0189 E/W St: Drake N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ ____ Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 0 I 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R I Volume 1126 49 289 18 136 54 1306 624 6 120 823 219 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left A Thru Right Peds NB Right A SB Right A Green 6.0 Yellow 0.0 All Red 0.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 2 3 4 1 I NB Left A I Thru A I Right X I Peds A I SB Left A I Thru A 1 Right X 1 Peds EB Right WB Right 5 6 7 8 A A A P A P X A P P P X A A 24.0 6.0 6.0 48.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs '10 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, Date: 11/17/00 Period: pm Projecta D: 0189 E/W St: Drake Inter.: Timberline/Drake P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent hort long bkgrd total N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R Volume 1310 126 341 17 81 56 1274 790 13 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left A Thru Right Peds NB Right A SB Right A Green 6.0 Yellow 0.0 All Red 0.0 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations__ 2 3 4 I A I NB Left A A I Thru A A 1 Right X 1 Peds A I SB Left A 1 Thru A 1 Right X I Peds 1 EB Right A 1 WB Right 6.0 22.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 I Southbound L T R I I 1 2 1 L T R 154 576 115 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 7 8 A A A P A P X A P P P X A A 6.0 6.0 44.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs I APPENDIX B R = right tum S = straight I = lof hvn MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 12-13-01 Observer: Harry Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Intersection: Timberline/Custer Time Begins Northbound: Timberline Southbound: Timberline Total northisouth Eastbound: Custer Westbound: Custer Total eastiwest Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:15 1 214 7 222 1 198 3 202 424 1 0 3 4 3 0 0 3 7 431 7:30 0 258 5 263 0 277 0 277 540 1 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 7 547 7:45 2 253 5 260 2 193 2 197 457 2 0 6 8 2 0 0 2 10 467 8:00 2 289 4 295 0 229 0 229 524 1 0 3 4 2 0 0 1 2 6. 530 8:15 1 258 3 262 1 1203 1 0 1 204 466 1 1 0 1 4 5 1 0 1 1 2 7 473 8:30 1 5 1232 1 6 243 2 1230 1 0 1 232 475 0 1 0 1 5 5 3 101 0 1 3 8 483 7:30.8:30 1 5 11058 117 1 1080 1 3 1902 1 2 1 907 1 1987 1 5 1 0 119 1 24 5 1 0 1 1 1 6 1 30 1 2017 PHF 1 0.92 1 0.82 1 0.75 j 1 0.75 4:15 7 208 3 218 0 272 1 273 491 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 494 4:30 7 232 3 242 1 279 0 280 522 1 0 2 3 4 0 2 6 9 531 4:45 4 227 2 233 1 263 1 265 496 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 4 5 503 5:00 3 229 2 234 1 296' 2 299 533 0 0 3' 3 3 0 1 4 7 540 5:15 6 220 2 228 0 314 3 317 545 1 0 4 5 0 0 2 2 7 552 5:30 1 3 1210 1 2 1 215 1 0 1263 1 1 1 264 1 479 1 1 1 0 5 8 2 0 1 3 9 1 488 4:30.5:30 1,20 1908 1 9 1 937 1 3 11111521 8 1 1161 1 2098 1 2 1 0 110 1 12 110 1 0 1 8 1 18 1 28 1 2126 PHF 1 1 0.97 1 1 1 0.92 1 1 0.6 1 1 0.67 Dec-14-01 08:48 P.04 Traffic Operations NortWSouth Street: Timberline PO Box 580 file Nana 'Timberline&Drake 12-12411 Fas1/Wcst Streci: Drake Fort conins Co. SO522 Site Codc : t(xltx)i)96 Timc:PM Start Date :IV12/2001 WcAhcr: Sunny Page No 1 Groups PrlMed- Urahifted Tlmbwtne Dn" I Ta teftm Doke SoAftounc W_ es"mrid Pei App. Rig], Thr Left Ps I App. ds i Total T I Nad,6aeld Rig I Thr Left I M 1 Pe App. Rp Trial Eastbound Thr Loft 'Pe ! App. IM i I I ToW Stan P" Tt LeR I ( tt Time u I Fodor' 1.0I 101 1.0: M u da u de ht u ds . Trial : �Tdsl 1.0i 101I 1.0� 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0! 1.0! 1.0 1.0i--�1�1.0 05:00 PM 74 223 3 0 300 05:15 PM 58 241 6 0 305 Grand 219 SM 20 0 1W Taal Apprch 21 77 1.9 0.0 % 0 1 Trial % 82 30 0.7 0.0 39.1 -)Fir-.t» 13 34 1 1 49 8 34 2 0 44 54 136 8 1 199 27 58, 4.0 05 1 3 20 s1 n3 on 7S 0 153 98 0 251 2 154 61 0 237 6 637 313 0 956 6 32. 0.6 8 00 23 11- oil on 35a �Hr-.34- I a out 7 In TaW lase; 7191 Kill 161 0. Rpm TN. Lea Pdt r 1 4 T 117=1 4 30 00 PM 7/127001 5 1500 PM n FI 1 I, Let Trrtu R m Peft 1 313 637 e 0 110-7 W `2� Out In Total Tu hgd p 87 11 38 0 136 02 17 38 0 147 296 49 125 0 471 52. 10 28 0.0 8 4 8 11. 18 4.7 00 177 t- 746 733 26M Dec-14-01 08:47 Traffic Operations P.02 North/South Slrocl: Timberline PO Box 580 File Nano : Tintbeiline&Drake 12-12-kIt EaNWest Street: Drake Fort Collins Co. 80522 Sitc Cock- : 0110g0090 Time- AM Start Date : 12/12/2001 Wcdbcr: bete Snow Page No 1 Groups Ptintad- UnshlRed I Tnlbertim I Orate i Timberline Orate Souvom rW Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Rig Tte Left I Pe App. I'll; Thr Left I Pe App. 1 Rig! ' Thr �M Pe App. ! Rag Thr i Pei App Int Tams M u d, . Tote: ! u ds Toth M u da ToWl M uiLeftl ds Toth Total Factor : 1.0 1 1:0 1 1.0 i, 1.0 07:30 AIM 22 153 15 0 07:45AM 41 130 9 0 190 lea 1.01 8 le 1.0 20 25 t o 1.0 i 101 1.01 1 1 301 2 200 3 0 441 1 193 1.0 93 72 1.0 - 11 0 j 0 295 112 0 265 54 1.0 1 1.0 j 25 71 32 112 1.O j--- —� 0 2081725 0 2081 706 —�6363- 291 -- 4- - '0 08:00 AM 29 143 16 1 378 169 24 15 45 20 4 1 74: 3 393 0 0 351 6 223 165 39 0 561 1176 0 268 82 57 183 33 66 0 416 11429 0 183 675 08:15 AM 23 152 14 0 189 17 16 3 1 371 4 184 73 0 261 89 36 59 0 104 071 Grww 115 586 54 1 Tow 756 56 81 7 2 146i 13 SW 277 0 1090 347 125 310 0 793 2775 Apprch 15. T7. 7.1 01 35. 5525. 4.0 14 ! 1.2 d 0.0 t8 39. 0.0 9b 2 5 4 6 T,a.iac A 21 10 Mn ?» >n io n,% n1 Sai nc 28. 10 nn ioo 12, ec 11 00 Z82! Curt In Tool 1 f1fi6� j 756; j tYl7j i F-Ait1 seal sit! 1 11 RIM TMu lent PW% 1 of TIC 1 T _� C r 7 rlo tit ti to vj 2/IZ*Mt 730 mow J z R� ifrl/"I s 15 W Ay Se. on IwHie ♦ o Im1 Thru Right Pe" ml eool 131 0l C L�41Izwol OM In 1aOf I mmen,no .., 4 Ca Attachment "B" Transportation Impact Study Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet IO eG i t,oVA -ti OAJ List the pedestrian destinations within 1320' (1.5 miles for schools) of the project boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian Level of Service for the facility/corridor linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity, types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and security of the selected route(s). Latimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 3 Attachment "A" Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project Information Project Name TZ(6DEAU 6,0Q 'a-eoPGRS , CGTC, Project Location SE CoRN6K- DRAKE ��.BBG� 6 TIS Assumptions Type of Study Full: Intermediate: 0 Study Area Boundaries North: South: East: West: Study Years Short Range: Z. StwG Lo Q Range: 2020 Future Traffic Growth Rate F P.o M .l s 9GL() FA Qat 1 I , Study Intersections 1. All access drives 5. 2. -DR�K6/Tasee�raG 6. 3' �R K6/�6aiA�otS 7• 4.T�H e2��N� CusYeK 8. Time Period for Study AM: 7:00-9:00 1 PM: 4:00-6:00 Sat Noon: NO Trip Generation Rates ?&K J TG Trip Adjustment Factors Passby: ?eK. 'Y T4 Captive Market: Deli I` iF Overall Trip Distribution North South East West Mode Split Assumptions Committed Roadway Improvements Other Traffic Studies 121 k)Q- Areas Requiring Special Study Date: 12 1 5-1 d ( Traffic Engineer: 1I A -'CT Local Entity Engineer: EL 10- tf S-- Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 2 IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Rigden Farm Commercial development on the short range and long range street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: The development of the Rigden Farm Commercial is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Rigden Farm Commercial will generate approximately 10,078 daily trip ends, 289 morning peak hour trip ends, and 963 afternoon peak hour trip ends. However, the number of new trips that the Rigden Farm Commercial would generate would be 7500-7600 trip ends per weekday. Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable with -existing controls and geometry. Using the short range background traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants will be met at the Timberline/Custer intersection. - In the short range future, given development of the Rigden Farm Commercial and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably, with the recommended geometry shown in Figure 12. In the long range future, given development of the Rigden Farm Commercial, the key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. The long range geometry is shown in Figure 13. At the Drake/Illinois intersection, the westbound left -in movement, and at the Drake/Iowa intersection, the eastbound left - in movement can be accommodated from a vehicle storage perspective. However, in order to allow both of these movements the deceleration requirement will need to be waived. Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines. 30 , reasonable person would not attempt to make a northbound left -turn from Illinois Drive. The painted median/striping to the east of the end of the raised median should be at least 16 feet wide. This is somewhat wider than the center lane shown on the two lane arterial street cross section in the Fort Collins Street Standards. As the Rigden Farm Commercial goes through the development review process, this design should be refined. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix I shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Rigden Farm Commercial. There will be five pedestrian destinations within 1320 feet of the Rigden Farm Commercial. These are: 1) Fort Collins High School (1 mile for schools), 2) the residential area west of the site, 3) the future residential/ commercial area northwest of the site (Spring Creek Farm), 4) the residential/commercial area north of the site (The Johnson Farm Property), and 5) the residential area east of the site (Rigden Farm). This site is in an area type termed "school walking area" and "activity center." The level of service determination assumes that future residential developments (namely, Spring Creek Farm, Rigden Farm, and The Johnson Farm Property) will build their streets and adjacent streets in accordance with Fort Collins Standards. This being the case, pedestrian facilities will exist where they currently do not. This is a reasonable assumption. If this does not occur or is not accepted by the City, then acceptable pedestrian level of service cannot be achieved. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix I. The minimum level of service for "activity center" is B 'for all categories. With the assumed future pedestrian facilities along future streets, the pedestrian level of service will be acceptable. Bicycle Level of Service Appendix I shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Rigden Farm Commercial. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there is one destination area within 1320 feet of the Rigden Farm Commercial. This is the "activity center" indicated on the Fort Collins Pedestrian Plan, located in the area of the Timberline/Drake intersection. This "activity center" will likely be the Rigden Farm Commercial development. A bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix I. Transit Level of Service Currently, this area is served by Route 10. The Fort Collins 2015 Transit System Map shows that Timberline Road will be a high frequency transit corridor with 20 minute service. Drake Road will be served by feeder route service at 30 minute headways. Transit level of service will be at B. The Rigden Farm Commercial will be within 1320 feet of a high frequency or feeder transit route in the future. A future transit level of service worksheet is provided in Appendix I. 29 Drake Road --- ---------- cn 0 c: Johnson Farm Raised Median Property Paint 41� N SCALE: l"=60' SPRING CREEK FARMS LLC cu 0 POTENTIAL DRAKE ROAD DESIGN Figure 15 28 TABLE 7 Long Range (2020) Peak Hour Operation of Drake Road Intersections err _ tFV'-� tiS...3. s,iW'ItMNE `v �� .a42�—�� 3'y� r';• '''Lr n NN Drake/Illinois (stop sign) NB RT B C SB RT C B WB LT A B Drake/Iowa (stop sign) NB LT/T C D NB RT B B NB APPROACH C C SB LTlr C C SB RT B B SB APPROACH C B EB LT A A WB LT A A 27 N o 5/5 p c 5/5 to + 700/610 `O ZI 610/585 440/635 —` 10/40 Drake 100225 440/615 —� 0 10/35 �n an o � " = O tp N LO LONG RANGE (2020) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC --a*— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Figure 14 0XI Two full -movement intersections are proposed to Illinois Drive, between Drake Road and Custer Drive. The accesses to the Rigden Farm Commercial will line-up with Johnson Way and Waukee Drive. The owners of Rigden Farms have agreed to realign Waukee Drive (east leg) to the north to line-up with the proposed access to the Rigden Farm Commercial. This will not present any operational problems. In fact, the separation between Custer Drive and Waukee Drive will increase, creating additional room for southbound left turns at Custer Drive and northbound left turns at Waukee Drive (site access). On -street diagonal parking is proposed on Illinois Drive. With diagonal parking on Illinois Drive, the travel way will be oversized. This will enable a delivery vehicle to temporarily stand in the middle of Illinois Drive while still allowing traffic to get around them on both sides. The cross section of Illinois Drive would be similar to that of Walnut Street in Old Town Fort Collins. As mentioned earlier, the Drake/Illinois intersection is proposed to be right-in/right-out on the north side of Drake Road and right- in/right-out/left-in on the south side of Drake Road. The Drake/Iowa intersection is located 395 feet east of Illinois Drive (on -centers). The north leg of Iowa Drive goes into the Johnson Farm Property. In order to conduct a justification analysis, the long range traffic forecasts should be used. Figure 14 shows the long range peak hour traffic on Drake Road between Illinois Drive and Iowa Drive. These two intersections operate as indicated in Table 7. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix H. The operation of the westbound left turn approaching Illinois Drive and of the eastbound left turn approaching Iowa Drive are at level of service A/B. The calculated 95% left -turn queue lengths are less than one vehicle in the peak hours. Therefore, the maximum storage that is required is one vehicle length (nominally 25 feet). The functional, available area on Drake Road between Illinois Drive and Iowa Drive is approximately 360 feet. Therefore, it is concluded that there is sufficient distance between these two streets to provide storage for the left turns. As a two lane arterial street, this segment of Drake Road will have a posted speed of between 30-45 mph. According to the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards," left -turn lanes should also provide for deceleration, as well as, vehicle storage. The desirable deceleration length at the potential.posted speeds are: at 30 mph - 235 feet, at 35 mph - 275 feet, at 40 mph - 315 feet, and at 45 mph - 375 feet. The minimum deceleration lengths at the potential posted speeds are: at 30 mph - 230 feet, at 35 mph - 250 feet, at 40 mph - 280 feet, and at 45 mph - 320 feet. The deceleration length would need to be provided in both directions. There is enough separation i between these two streets to provide for the necessary storage and the ability for vehicles to enter the respective left -turn lanes. However, there is not sufficient separation to provide for full deceleration. In order to have a westbound left -turn lane on Drake Road approaching Illinois Drive, a waiver with regard to the deceleration length will be necessary. Figure 15 shows a horizontal design of Drake Road in this segment. The raised median to the east of Timberline Road is shown to project due east, far enough east of the Illinois Drive intersection such that a 25 U- 11 I �,/RT-iNRT-out I r 5 0 H c H +-- - Denotes Lane LONG RANGE (2020) GEOMETRY N Drake Custer Figure 13 24 N 'n me - Denotes Lane SHORT RANGE (2007) GEOMETRY P ke ter Figure 12 0*1 Geometry As described earlier and shown on the site plan (Figure 4), the following general public site accesses are proposed: right-in/right- out to Timberline Road, right-in/right-out to Custer Drive, and two full -movement intersection to Illinois Drive. The two right-in/right- out accesses will be enforced by center medians in Timberline Road and Custer Drive. The full -movement intersections on Illinois Drive will have stop sign control on the east/west streets/driveways. Truck (service) access is proposed to Drake Road. This truck access will consist of two one-way driveways, the right -in only located approximately 200 feet east of Timberline Road and the right -out only located approximately 150 feet west of Illinois Drive. There will be a center median in Drake Road that will assure only right -turn movements. The Custer/Illinois intersection will be a full -movement intersection with stop sign control on Illinois Drive. The current Drake/Illinois intersection provides for right-in/right-out movements both north (Johnson Farm Property) and south (Rigden Farm) of Drake Road. Future retail businesses, King Soopers in particular, desire to have westbound left -in also at the Drake/Illinois intersection. This was discussed with City staff in preliminary meetings. City staff indicated that the left -in movement would need to be justified. The two existing public street intersections (Timberline/Drake and Timberline/ Custer) were analyzed with signal control. As discussed earlier, it is expected that a signal will be warranted at the Timberline/Custer intersection. The recommended short range geometry and long range geometry are shown schematically in Figures 12 and 13, respectively. Discussion of the details of the various accesses is presented below. Access locations were taken from the latest available site plan as provided by Wyatt & Associates -Architects. The Timberline Road right-in/right-out access is located approximately 380 feet north of Custer Drive (on -centers). Since Timberline Road is a major arterial street, it is recommended that there be a right -turn auxiliary lane on Timberline Road to the south of this access. At the posted speed of 40 mph on Timberline Road, the desirable length of a right -turn lane is 315 feet for a stop condition. This length includes taper (@ 160 feet) and is measured from the beginning of the curb return on Timberline Road. However, a 40 foot radius is shown on the site plan. Therefore, the turning speed of an entering vehicle would be at least 15 mph, which would reduce the desirable deceleration lane length to 295 feet. Due to the location of Custer Drive, this length of auxiliary right -turn lane cannot be achieved. However, a minimum design, where braking begins at 2/3 full lane width, results in a right -turn lane length of 165 feet. This can be achieved in the area between the proposed access and Custer Drive. The Custer Drive right-in/right-out access is located approximately 220 feet west of Illinois Drive (on -centers). A deceleration lane is not required on Custer Drive approaching this access. The location will allow an exiting vehicle to enter the left - turn lane or the through/right-turn lane approaching the Timberline/Custer intersection. W, TABLE 6 Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation Timberline/Drake NB D C Timberline/Custer NB C B OVERALL C Istop sign) Istop sign) 21 TABLE 5 Short Range (2007) Total Peak Hour Operation Timberline/Drake NB C C Timberline/Custer NB B B (stop sign) (stop sign) (stop sign) 20 TABLE 3 Short Range (2007) Background Peak Hour Operation Timberline/Drake NB C C Timberline/Custer NB B B (stop sign) TABLE 4 Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation or Timberline/Drake NB C C Timberline/Custer NB C B 19 E co O N LO V c7 o U `— 245/190 0 5/5 I" I� f 360/340 to �— 700/610 J i 1551110 /—20/35 490/355 1 T 440/635 �/ Drake 295/400 —� I I 100=5 V to 0 to 510/480 I _r' I o V LO r, N N 60235 fI RT-in/RT-out 0 0 m n fO o 0 M 0 � o FL c Lo o 125/95 2 � 20/40 \ ( LO N Z N "' � `D — 5/10 `� J l --a-- 290225 215285 10/20 320250 1 5/5 10/5 � } r 5/10 I,o o 0 20/15 c m m N CD +-- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 35/140 —j1""*] f r Custer 125/300 —w— Q m IQ 5/15 z 'O t Figure 11 17 E i= Co CD O Coy o C> � 190/145 cIJ °D �— 290275 r j � 110170 420/325 —J' "'o) f r 2501355 o o U13 410/370 v o Co ago to`r m Of O v%�-65250 f r in/RT-out CO 0 `o `° ua v 0 co cM ` OCD` �— 110/85 U'lO NOM 190270Nc 10/5 NOM i N LO v 20/15 o cn N o co co rn 0 H c O N 5/15 275215 --a-- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles SHORT RANGE (2007) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 16 .o N 0 0 r 5/5 `D �— 530/460 20/35 335/490 —► 90220 0 can 0 $2 0 1020 �— 270200 Drake Custer 30/125 105280 —.► Figure 10 ao 0 r- v co i 45/9 E i= 58232 RT-in/RT-out co co 0 m 0 m l 33/170 t:!EN fo C N N 5 0 0 H c 0 0: v JN 8/19 f--10/30 --o— AM/PM LONG RANGE (2020) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC i— 16/32 79200 0 co C o U.) cn o cm r 1428 � 8H9 2&121 N Drake Custer Figure 9 15 I GUI' SHORT RANGE (2007) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC pw w ter Figure 8 14 m E o o m to N � N o v 245/190 t4 — 360/340 155/110 490/355 --/ 1 250/310 I I 510/480 v N LO r0 R to N tp co I- O N m Lo 125/95 U' tI" — 5/10 J 4 l_ 180/115 10/5 1 5/10 —a— I I I to Lo to 20/15 o m °' 0 o r, co r f AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5'Vehicles A N.o c 0 0 o 5/5 700/610 440/635 f/ Drake 20/25 LO 0 r O �) lZ tin 5/10 f 5/550/205 5/15 Custer 120/300 t`n g t`n 5/15 O to Z LONG RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND Figure 7 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 13 m A& E 0 0 N 0 v o r, o o CM CD+ 190/145 280275 110/70 Co tD 5/5 . /rl �— 53aaso :20/325 --Y' t r Drake 195245 —i► 4101370 o Co to c LO I v r) o +01�� 85/100AM/PM Custer Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Lo SHORT RANGE (2007) BACKGROUND Figure 6 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 12 i TRIP DISTRIBUTION � F I 11 Figure 5 TABLE 2 Trip Generation { 4 850 Supermarket 66.0 KSF 111.51 7360 1.98 131 1.27 84 5.87 387 5.64 372 820 Retail 38.6 KSF 42.92 1657 0.63 24 0.40 15 1.80 69 1.94 75 912 Bank 4.0 KSF 26521 1061 5.10 20 3.85 15 7.44 30 7.60 30 Subtotal 10.078 175 114 486 477 Passby adjustment 2510 24 24 177 177 Total 7570 151 90 309 300 Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Rigden Farm Commercial based upon gravity model analysis, the location of trip productions for these types of land uses, and engineering judgment. Future year data was obtained from the NFRRTP and other traffic studies. Figure 5 shows the short range and long range trip distribution used for the Rigden Farm Commercial. Background Traffic Projections Figures 6 and 7 show the respective background traffic projections. Background short range and long range future horizons the NFRRTP and various traffic studies pre Collins. The other traffic studies in thi Phases 1 and 2, The Willow at Rigden Fa Johnson Farm Property, and Centerpoint Plaza. Trip Assignment short range and long range traffic projections for the were obtained by reviewing pared for this area of Fort s area are for Rigden Farm rm, Spring Creek Farm, The Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figures 8 and 9 show the respective short range and long range site generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 10 shows the total (site plus background) short range peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Figure 11 shows the total long range morning and afternoon peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Using the short range background traffic 10 SITE PLAN SPFMClt®CFARW.LLC ZOW—T -- DRAW= or%A CUSTER DRIVE A& N ,LE: 1"=200' Figure 4 rwc� t..t 1dfK 9 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Rigden Farm Commercial is a commercial development, located in the northeast quadrant of the Timberline/Drake intersection in Fort Collins. Figure 4 shows a site plan of the Rigden Farm Commercial. The short range analysis (Year 2007) includes development of the Rigden Farm Commercial and an appropriate increase in background traffic, due to normal growth and other potential developments in the area. The long j range analysis year is considered to be 2020. The site plan shows the Rigden Farm Commercial indicating the primary accesses to the arterial streets, the collector street, and the local street adjacent to the Rigden Farm Commercial. The control and allowed movements at each access are: a right-in/right-out access to Timberline Road; a right-in/right-out access to Custer Drive; a right-in/right-out/left-in access (Illinois Drive) to Drake Road, and a full -movement access (Illinois Drive) to Custer Drive. There will be two full -movement intersections to Illinois Drive. Truck access tc the rear of the King Soopers store and the adjacent retail buildings to the east will be from/to Drake Road. These accesses were shown tc City staff in a number of preliminary meetings. The use and locations were agreed upon. Analyses of the service accesses were not requested. i I Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a fdevelopment such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. While the total trip generation for this site is calculated to be in excess of 10,000 trip J ends per weekday, it is important to understand that not all of these are new vehicle trips on the adjacent street system. Retail centers and banks attract patrons who are already on the adjacent streets. For i example, a person may stop at a store or bank as an intermediate destination in a home -based work trip. This is common and the Institute of Transportation Engineers has conducted research regarding what are termed passby trips. The "Trip Generation Handbook," ITE was used as a i reference in calculating and assigning passby trips. Based upon this j reference and in consideration of the total calculated trip generation, the new trips that the Rigden Farm Commercial would generate would be approximately 7500-7600 trip ends per weekday. This value is ! significantly less than the 10,078 trip ends shown in Table 2. There may also be some captured trips, which are defined as a single trip i involving multiple on -site trip purposes, at the Rigden Farm Commercial. E This can reduce the trip generation by an additional 5-10 percent. In order to conduct a conservative analysis, captured trips were not included in the trip generation or subsequent assignments. 8 TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation �.r^t-vSh Y. "'- -S. ,+ �- c J ..i`-. t ham`' ..::; .: �' : �� :5F_".`._r. `J°'la.. . , i at " A' .y. \ ✓. ...- hh'2__ Timberline/Drake (signal) EB C C WB C C NB C C SB B B OVERALL C C Timberline/Custer (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A B WB LT D D WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH D C NB LT B B SB LT B B A& E N T N go Co Co US Nvk- r56� T uO h 81 /136 i /-7/8 310/126 1 Drake 126149 —� m v o 341289 —y M m 04 rn N t- _z! J 1 I b N T T 1 /6 f N rn m 0/0 f J + � 5/10 Custer 52 f 0/0 o ao Q 19/10Lo 0 T -J ' - AM/PM AVERAGED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 6 I O M O N cO O co Q In to JiU U r 56/54 --a— 81/136 r 7/8 310/126 ) f r Drake 126/49 —► M_ r-- co 347296 c` rp N co N coo No cM 1 /6 IN ) M 0/0 5/10 52 '**] f ,/ Custer 0/0 Cl co rn 19/10 Lo co r m 0 --a- AM/PM RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N Figure 2 5 Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic counts at the key existing intersections are shown in Figure 2. The traffic data for the Timberline/Drake and Timberline/Custer intersections was collected in December 2001. Raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix A. Since traffic counts were obtained on different days, they were averaged between intersections. The averaged recent peak hour counts are shown in Figure 3. Existing Operation The counted intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 3, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix B. The key intersections operate acceptably overall during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service E or better in a mixed use district. At unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at level of service F for any approach leg for an arterial/local intersection. Pedestrian Facilities There are pedestrian facilities along the west side of Timberline Road, south of Drake Road. There are no sidewalks on the east side of Timberline Road. However, these sidewalks will be constructed with the development of the First Assembly of God Church and Rigden Farm. There are currently no sidewalks along Drake Road. However, when these roads are built to arterial standards, sidewalks will be included in the respective cross sections. Sidewalks are/will be incorporated within this development. Bicycle Facilities Bicycle Lanes exist or can exist within the cross section of Timberline Road, Drake Road, and Custer Drive per Fort Collins standards. Other streets that require bike lanes are beyond 1320 feet from the Rigden Farm Commercial site. Transit Facilities Transfort currently serves this area of Fort Collins with Route 10. Route 10 provides 60 minute service with a stop near the Timberline/Drake intersection. SITE LOCATION 1 Horsetooth I 1 1 widiiiii SCALE: 3 N Figure 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Rigden Farm Commercial is shown in Figure 1. ' It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions 1 be presented. J Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily either vacant (agriculture) or residential. A residential development (Rigden Farm) is under construction to the east of the site. The Spring Creek Farm mixed -use development, located northwest of the site, and the Johnson Farm Property, located north of the site, are currently going through the ! land development approval process in Fort Collins. Currently, these _ properties are in agricultural use. Land adjacent to the site is flat (<2% grade) from a traffic operations perspective. The center of Fort 1 1 Collins lies to the west of the proposed Rigden Farm Commercial. The Timberline Road corridor, according to the City of Fort Collins Structure Plan, will have a mixture of land uses, including employment, residential, industrial, and commercial. As such, it is considered to be a "Mixed Use District." Roads The primary streets near the Rigden Farm Commercial site are Timberline Road, Drake Road, and Custer Drive. Timberline Road is to the west of the Rigden Farm Commercial site. It is classified as a six - lane arterial beyond the year 2015 on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Timberline Road has a four -lane cross section near the Rigden Farm Commercial site. At Drake Road, Timberline Road has two travel lanes in each direction, dual northbound left -turn lanes, a southbound left -turn lane, northbound and southbound right -turn lanes, and bike facilities. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph. Drake Road is north of the Rigden Farm Commercial site. It is an east -west street designated as a four -lane arterial west of Timberline i Road and a two-lane arterial east of Timberline Road on the Fort Collins ! Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a two-lane cross section adjacent to the site. At Timberline Road, Drake Road has two travel lanes in each direction, dual eastbound left -turn lanes, a westbound left -turn lane, an eastbound right -turn lane, and bike facilities. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph. The Timberline/Drake intersection has signal control. j Custer Drive is south of the Rigden Farm Commercial site. It is an east -west street designated as a major collector on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a two-lane cross section in the area of the site. At Timberline Road, Custer Drive has an eastbound combined left-turn/through/right-turn lane, a westbound left -turn lane, and a westbound combined through/right-turn lane. The Timberline/Custer intersection has stop sign control on Custer Drive. ' 2 I. INTRODUCTION This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development of the Rigden Farm Commercial. The proposed Rigden Farm Commercial is located in the southeast quadrant of the Timberline/Drake intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. } During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made f with the project planning consultant (Wyatt & Associates), the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff, the Fort Collins Transportation Planning staff, and the Fort Collins Current Planning staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines. A Base Assumptions Form and :., related information are provided in Appendix A. The study involved the following steps: J t i 1 I - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 5 3. Adjusted Recent Peak Hour Traffic .................... 6 4. Site Plan ............................................ 9 5. Trip Distribution .................................... 11 6. Short Range (2007) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 12 7. Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Traffic ....... 13 8. Short Range (2007) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic .................................... 14 9. Long Range (2020) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic .................................... 15 10. Short Range (2007) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........... 16 11. Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Traffic ............ 17 12. Short Range (2007) Geometry .......................... 23 13. Long Range (2020) Geometry ........................... 24 14. Long Range (2020) Peak Hour Traffic .................. 26 15. Potential Drake Road Design .......................... 28 APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form/Peak Hour Traffic Counts B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions C Signal Warrants D Short Range Background Traffic Operation E Long Range Background Traffic Operation F Short Range Total Traffic Operation G Long Range Total Traffic Operation H Long Range Traffic Operation of Drake Road Intersections I Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 tLand Use ............................................. 2 IRoads ................................................ 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 4 Existing Operation ................................... 4 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 4 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 4 z Transit Facilities ................................... 4 i III. Proposed Development ................................. 8 Trip Generation ...................................... 8 Trip Distribution .................................... 10 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 10 Trip Assignment ...................................... 10 Signal Warrants ...................................... 10 Operation Analysis ................................... 18 Interior Street Classifications ...................... 18 Geometry............................................. 22 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 29 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 29 Transit Level of Service ............................. 29 t IV. Conclusions .......................................... 30 I LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 7 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 10 3. Short Range (2007) Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 19 4. Long Range (2020) Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 19 5. Short Range (2007) Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 20 6. Long Range (2020) Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 21 7. Long Range (2020) Peak Hour Operation of Drake Road Intersections ........................... 27 -1 �1 t RIDDEN FARM COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY 2002 Prepared for: Wyatt & Associates 1865 S. Pearl Street Denver, CO 80210 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 OQ.+a RJ.F�T�� e *s. 152 men HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 11/17/00 Period: m pm Project D: 0189 E/W St: Custer Eastbound I L T R I No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 LGConfig 1 LTR Volume 110 1 20 Lane Width 1 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 Inter.: Timberline/Custer Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent short long kgrd otal N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R 1 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 I L TR I L T R 1155 1 110 I10 1345 60 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A 1 NB Left Thru A I Thru Right A 1 Right Peds X I Peds WB Left A I SB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right Peds X 1 Peds NB Right A 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 26.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 5 6 A P P P X A P P P X I Southbound L T R I _ 1 1 2 0 L TR 140 1310 5 112.0 12.0 1 0 6.0 58.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length 7 8 100.0 secs 2ti Intersection Performance Summary_ ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate ,,frrp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS ''Eastbound 446 3433 0.74 0.13 48.3 D 991 3539 0.14 0.28• 27.0 C 32.6 C 712 1583 0.51 0.45 20.2 C Westbound 436 1770 0.02 0.30 24.6 C R 731 3322 0.22 0.22 32.1 C 31.8 C northbound 946 3433 0.67 0.13 45.3 D T 1770 3539 0.49 0.50 16.7 B 23.9 C 966 1583 0.01 0.61 7.7 A 'fouthbound 410 1770 0.13 0.52 12.4 B 1557 3539 0.37 0.44 19.5 B 17.2 B (� 966 1583 0.12 0.61 8.3 A Intersection Delay = 25.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Ilatthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive foveland, CO 80538 !Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael I gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 11/17/00 'Analysis Time Period: (a pm intersection: fiimberline/Drake rea Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fo Collins �nalysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd total roject ID: 0189 East/West Street North/South Street Drake Timberline V i '� q