Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPETERSON PLACE (611 S. PETERSON) - PDP - 35-00 - CORRESPONDENCE - (6)no later than July 5, 2001 by 5:00 p.m. Upon receipt, the revisions will be routed to the appropriate City departments and outside reviewing agencies, with their comments due to the project planner no later than the third weekly staff review meeting (Wednesday mornings) following receipt of the revisions. At this staff review meeting the item will be discussed and it will be determined if the project is ready to go to the Planning and Zoning Board for a decision. If so, will be scheduled for the nearest Board hearing date with an opening on the agenda. Please return all drawings red -lined by City staff with submission of your revisions. Also, the number of copies of revisions for each document to be resubmitted is on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet (both sides). Due to significant concerns expressed by City staff, you should contact me at 221- 6341 to schedule a meeting with the appropriate people to discuss these comments. Sincerely, -- Vv Steve Olt Project Planner cc: Cameron Gloss, Current Planning Director Engineering Stormwater Water/ Wastewater Natural Resources Transportation Planning Traffic Operations Intermill Land Surveying Project File #35-00 15. Steve Olt of the Current Planning Department stated that his comments are on red -lined Site, Landscape, and Building Elevations plans that are being forwarded to the applicant. Please contact Steve, at 221-6341, if you have questions about his comments. The following comments/concerns were expressed at the weekly Staff Review Meeting on March 21, 2001: Engineering 16. Need detail (both upstream and downstream) where water will flow under the access points at Peterson Street and the alley. 17. Need to show street patching for Peterson Street. Transportation Planning/Mark Jackson 18. Show bicycle parking as shown on the previous Site Plan. 19. Extend the walkway on the south side of the property to the west end of the site. Natural Resources/Doug Moore 20. The trash enclosure should be designed to include recycling. Stormwater (Basil Hamdan) 21. 80% of the site is not detained. 22. The pipe has been incorrectly sized, using 0.4 cfs instead of the standard. 23. Another round of review is needed. This completes the staff comments at this time. Additional comments could be forthcoming if and when they are received from City departments and outside reviewing agencies. Under the development review process and schedule there is a 90 day plan revision submittal time -frame (by the applicant to the City) mandated by the City. The 90 day turnaround period begins on the date of this comment letter (April 6, 2001) prepared by the project planner in the Current Planning Department. In this case, revisions must be submitted the 611 Peterson Street address because the address for these new dwelling units may change. b. The subdivision plat does close. C. A copy of the Project Comment Sheet dated 11/ 15/00 is attached to this comment letter. Please contact Jim Hoff, at 221-6588, if you have questions about these comments. 14. Ward Stanford of the Traffic Operations Department offered the following comments: a. Traffic Operations did not receive any response to their previous comments (below): * Will parking be allowed on the asphalt area east of the building, accessed from South Peterson Street? If so, an access easement should be considered. * Is the condition of the alley pavement adequate to handle additional regular traffic without improvements? * Do the accesses to the alley from Laurel and Myrtle Streets meet sight distance criteria? Please provide a response. b. Do the proposed Broadmoor Junipers along the alley meet the City's sight distance criteria? What are their growth characteristics? It appears that the sight distance triangle as shown on the Landscape Plan does not meet City or AASHTO requirements. Minimum sight distance for 20 mph is 125' and the given triangle measures only 50'. Please verify adequate sight distance. Please contact Ward, at 221-6820, if you have questions about these questions/comments. f. Additional comments are provided on red -lined plans that are being forwarded to the applicant. Please contact Jeff, at 221-6674, if you have questions about his comments. 7. Doug Moore of the Natural Resources Department stated that the applicant should consider designing the trash enclosure to accommodate recycling. 8. Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, stated that he has no concerns or comments regarding this development proposal. 9. Mike Spurgin of the Post Office stated that they have no concerns or comments regarding this development proposal. 10. A representative of Public Service Company of Colorado stated that if natural gas service is desired for the proposed structure, the service line will have to be installed prior to paving in the 10' wide utility, drainage, landscape, and pedestrian access easement along the south side of the property. 11. GayLene Rossiter of Transfort stated that they have no concerns or comments regarding this development proposal. 12. Mark Jackson of Transportation Planning offered the following comments: a. Show the bicycle parking rack as in the previous Site Plan. b. Can the pedestrian walkway be extended to the western edge of the site and still accommodate long-term parking (see red -lined Site Plan)? C. Most previous comments have been addressed. Please contact Mark, at 416-2029, if you have questions about these comments. 13. The Technical Services (Mapping) Department offered the following comments: a. The title of the subdivision plat should be something other than 4. Gary Lopez of the Zoning Department stated that one Honeylocust must be added along the alley and move the proposed Honeylocust on the south property east to accommodate the additional tree. 5. Dave Stringer of the Engineering Department offered the following comments: a. Stormwater wants an additional round of review. b. Need 2 survey control points shown on the cover sheet. C. Show detail of the pan aligning with the 6" outlet pipe at the curb. d. Show detail of estimated street repair limits at driveway reconstruction, as required by the City Repair Standards dated October, 1998. C. What will be the address of the new dwelling units? If not 611 Peterson Street, the plan should not reflect this address. f. Additional comments are on red -lined plans that are being forwarded to the applicant. Please contact Dave, at 221-6750, if you have questions about these comments. 6. Jeff Hill of the Water/Wastewater Department offered the following comments: a. As previously indicated, locate and show the approximate location of the existing water and sewer services for the lot adjacent to Peterson Street. b. Include the standard general note pertaining to shrub separation on the Landscape Plan. C. Provide required landscape/utility separation distances on the Landscape Plan. d. Realign the proposed sidewalk along the south property line to allow for proposed water and fire lines to extend along the south property line. e. Provide the meter pit detail with the next submittal. Commu_ .y Planning and Environmental _ .rvices Current Planning City of Fort Collins April 6, 2001 Susan Kruel-Froseth Kruel-Froseth Architects 1630 South College Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80525 Dear Susan, Staff has reviewed your revisions documentation for the 611 PETERSON STREET, Project Development Plan (PDP) - #35-00 that was submitted to the City on February 28, 2001, and is offering the following comments: 1. This property and development request is located at 611 Peterson Street. The lot fronts on Peterson Street, with an alley along the rear property line. There is an existing single family structure on the front of the lot. The property is in the NCM - Neighborhood Conservation, Medium Density Zoning District in the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code LUC . The proposed 3-plex, multi -family residential use is permitted in this District, subject to a Planning and Zoning Board (Type II) review and public hearing for a decision. 2. Dennis Greenwalt of AT&T Broadband (Cable TV) stated that they have no concerns or comments regarding this development proposal. 3. Michael Chavez of the Poudre Fire Authority offered the following comments: a. Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property and posted with a minimum of 10" numerals on a contrasting background (example: bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable). The design of the Address Kiosk is approved. The location of the kiosk needs to be discussed with PFA. b. This proposed building shall be fire sprinklered. Note: This building exceeds 150' from fire apparatus access. Please contact Michael, at 221-6570, if you have questions about his comment. 281 North College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020