HomeMy WebLinkAboutREDTAIL MAJOR AMENDMENT - FDP - 26-01C - CORRESPONDENCE -.Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue
Contact: Basil Hamdan
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 20 Created: 5/ l/2007
[9/ 18/07] Please provide an amended drainage report with the revised pipe
size calculations.
[5/ 1 / 07] Please include the amended letter in the original drainage report.
Original report can be retrieved from Stormwater so that no new reports
have to be produced (my contribution to earth day).
Please explain, in the amended letter explicitly what pipe sizes were changed
from the original design in order to accommodate the increased flows.
The private pipe running behind lot 6 is within a 5 foot drainage easement.
This is too narrow to allow any maintenance on this pipe.. Since the pipe is
shallow a minimum of a 10-foot wide easement should be provided in this
case. Please extend easement to tie into row where the pipe bends to tie
into the inlet on Conejos drive.
Please add spot elevations in the rear of Lot 6 to ensure proper drainage is
maintained. Add top and bottom of wall elevations.
All sheets that are being changed should show all original information, that
will remain valid after these changes as well as the new information. All
changes should be bubbled. Revision block title should describe the
proposed changes.
City staff is ready to accept mylars for the Redtail Major Amendment
documentation. However, these few current comments have to be addressed
on the mylars before staff will approve and sign the plans. Be sure and
return any red -lined plans you may still have when you submit the mylars.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related
to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341.
As
T Olt
City Planner
cc: Susan Joy
Basil Hamdan
North Star Design
King Surveyors, Inc.
Planning & Zoning file #26-01B/C
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
Jon Prouty Date: 9/26/2007
Lagunitas Redtail, Inc
3944 JFK Parkway, Suite 12E
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for REDTAIL MAJOR AMENDMENT -
FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: Photometric Plans
Number: 36 Created: 5 / 2 / 2007
[9/ 12/07] The back side shield prevents the actual light fixture from being
a visual intrusion into the natural area/wetlands. After market back side
shields are available and can be mounted to the pole and fixture. Again,
include exterior shielding for fixtures adjacent to the natural areas and
wetlands.
[7/4/07] Fixture with built in house -side shield is insufficient to screen
light from fixtures. If consultant does not understand comment, have them
contact Dana Leavitt (224-6143) or Steve Olt (221-6341) for a complete
explanation of standard as referenced below. In the luminaries schedule
add descriptor for exterior house -side shield.
[5/2/07] The proposed fixtures on the east and south edges of the new
parking lots adjacent to the buffer areas are to be screened from the buffer
area and the adjacent City -owned natural area with house -side shields. To
meet the standards in 3.4.1(E)(1) of the LUC, the actual fixture is to be
screened as a mitigation measure adjacent to the wetlands and natural
areas.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 52 Created: 9 / 6 / 2007
[9/6/07] Just need to show and label the vacated portion of the utility
easement vacated by separate document on all plan sets. Please e-mail a
word document of the legal description and PDF of the exhibit. I'll need a
check to Larimer County for the filing fees (amount to be determined) and
I'll get that recorded. Ready for mylars.
Page 1