The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutREDTAIL RESIDENTIAL - PDP - 26-01 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYFUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worksheet ,a� MIN}iq h$�i'. JL< N :t y v Ai > T5l 'afl'mr«....w a '�' �,p4 CSU Campus Transit Center 4.8 18 37 2.1 Foothills Fashion Mall 2.0 11 24 2.2 Fort Collins High School 3.9 16 37 2.3 Downtown Fort Collins 5.3 19 40 2.1 Total Travel Time 64 138 2.2 Service Level Standards Worksheet w Hours of Weekday Service 18 hours 16 hours X Weekday Frequency of Service 15 minutes 20 minutes X Travel Time Factor 2.0 x 2.0 x X Peak Load Factor s 1.2 <_ 1.2 X 2 of 4 = LOS.D i i i i i i i i i i >• ;� i i i i i� i Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p.20 LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service - connectivity nmunnan actual proposed base connectivity: C 110- pecific connections to priority sites: s description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address destination area classification (see text) City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan Pedestrian LOS Worksheet Project Location Classification: Transit Corridor & Other y S4]� � &`,.� � 1�'F`, y.'4..µ iwFr`�rk Y i'� ]`�{ � S r�..,�.�t�.�►�, 4 A V'n r >�% f 1 $'VJ �P`•`F'`"�"k`clai. F. N1'�d5'Srx' `�z�7 �t 5x aL�+; �� tlt t r{Z ry M'{Fayt 1 Offices adjacent to the site (Fossil Creek Office Park) Office Minimum B B B C B Actual A D A B C Proposed A D A B C 2 Commercial uses north of the site Commercial Minimum B B B C B Actual A D A B C Proposed A B A B C 3 Commercial/office uses northeast of the site Commercial/ Office Minimum B B B C B Actual B D C B C Proposed B D C B C 4 Residential area east of the site (Fossil Creek) Residential Minimum B B B C B Actual A D C B C Proposed A D C B C 5 Fairway Estates Residential Minimum B B B C B Actual B D C B C Proposed B D C B C 6 Minimum Actual Proposed 7 Minimum Actual Proposed g Minimum Actual Proposed g Minimum Actual Proposed 10 Minimum Actual Proposed 0 Cameron SCALE: 1"=1000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA 10 0 ss�y z APPENDIX G HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: 'Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0106 'East/West Street: North/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2/22/01 am Co ege/RT-in/RT-out Fort Colljns short on total RT-in/RT-out College Intersection Orientation: NS ' Vehicle Major Street: Approach Movement 1 Study period (hrs): 0.25 Volumes and Adjustments Northbound Southbound 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 1370 20 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 'Peak Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1442 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? 'Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No 'Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R' 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage flared Approach: Exists? Storage T Channelized? Lanes Configuration 9 Delay, Queue Length, and Level Approach NB SB Westbound ,Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 Lane Config I 0.95 15 2 0 No 1 R of Service Eastbound 1 10 11 12 1 R v (vph) 15 'C (m) (vph) 807 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.06 ontrol Delay 9.5 CIS A �� pproach Delay 9.5 Approach LOS A katthew Matthew HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 J. Delich J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period 'Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: North/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2/22/01 am m am Fort Collins — short <Gtotal RT-in/RT-out College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR -- Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? ,Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? No 0.95 0.95 800 84 2 0 T TR No ,Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ,Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ,Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes _Configuration 111 5 0.95 5 2 0 No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound ,Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R (vph) 1")C ,v (m) (vph) 912 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 ontrol Delay 9.0 OS A pproach Delay 9.0 Approach LOS A katthew Matthew HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 J. Delich J. Delich, P.E. Intersection Performance Summary _ 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 336 1292 0.41 0.26 31.4 C TR 393 1636 0.15 0.24 30.1 C 31.0 C Vestbound LT 336 1400 0.19 0.24 30.5 C 21.0 C R 712 1583 0.41 0.45 18.9 B Northbound 377 1770 0.07 0.59 8.6 A ' TR 2476 I 5054 0.66 0.49 16.5 B 16.4 B 'Southbound L 429 1770 0.87 0.67 45.1 D TR 2991 5070 0.60 0.59 8.2 A 14.5 B Intersection Delay = 16.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com _ OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael MAgency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/16 01 Analysis Time Period: am p Intersection: Col ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron rea Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short long kgr total iproject ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College I' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron 'Analyst: Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/16/01 Jurisd: Fort Collins am ® Year recent short ong bkgr total 'Period: Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound i Westbound i Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I_ Lo. Lanes 1 1 __ 1 0 1__ I 0 1 1 _ _ 1_ 1 I 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 LGConfig 1 L TR I LT R I L TR I L TR i 1130 10 45 150 10 275 125 1495 65 1355 1680 35 1 'Volume Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I 'Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 'EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X I Peds X B Left A I SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P ' Right A 1 Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right Right I WB Right A A 'SB Green 24.0 6.0 10.0 49.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 r11 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 11 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Adj Sat os Lane Group Approach URatippr/ Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 406 1269 0.10 0.32 24.0 C TR 516 1666 0.07 0.31 24.4 C 24.2 C Westbound 'LT 435 .1403 0.18 0.31 25.4 C 21.9 C R 697 1583 0.53 0.44 21.2 C Northbound L 390 1770 0.14 0.59 9.3 A TR 2530 5060 0.69 0.50 16.1 B 15.9 B Southbound L 269 1770 0.72 0.59 30.0 C TR 2531 5061 0.40 0.50 12.4 B 15.3 B ' Intersection Delay = 16.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Lone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com ' OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael ,Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2//�16/01 Analysis Time Period: /ampm Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron 'Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd tota ' Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date:. 2/16/01 Period: am m Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent short lon bkgrd total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I LT R 1 L TR I L ,Volume 140 10 25 165 10 350 150 1595 55 1185 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 'Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds B Left Thru ' Right Peds NB Right 'SB Right Green Yellow 111 Red L' A A A X A A X 31.0 3.0 2.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations - 3 4 1 I NB Left I Thru I Right I Peds I SB Left I Thru i Right I Peds I EB Right WB Right 3 0 TR 930 30 12.0 0 5 6 7 8 A P P P X A P P P X A 8.0 50.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs APPENDIX F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: p-*_ performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Jurisdiction: 'Analysis Year: Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: ' North/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2/221,Q1 am m College/RT-in/RT-out Fort Collins (5> long ota1 RT-in/RT-out College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R ' Volume 1705 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1794 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 Configuration T R Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 'RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) 'v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS 'Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 0 1 R 15 0.95 15 2 RM Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 1 I R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 9.9 A 751 0.02 0.06 9.9 A II HCS2000: Unsignalized•Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/22/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm 'Intersection: ollege/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: FOX= Collins Analysis Year: short long total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R volume feak-Hour Factor, PHF ourly Flow Rate, HFRercent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? 'Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? No 0.95 0.95 994 84 2 1 T R No No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 ,Configuration R Approach Movement Lane Config ,v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length ,Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS ,Matthew J Matthew J Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 I 1 R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Delich Delich, P.E. 9.1 A 891 0.01 0.02 9.1 A Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity 'Eastbound L 363 'TR 425 Westbound _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS 1346 0.38 0.27 30.3 C 1636 0.14 0.26 28.5 C LT 378 1453 0.14 R 712 1583 0.36 Northbound L 363 1770 0.07 T 1734 3539 0.74 R 776 1583 0.07 Southbound L 385 1770 0.85 T 2017 3539 0.72 R 902 1583 0.04 Intersection Delay = 18.4 0.26 28.6 C 0.45 18.3 B 0.57 9.9 A 0.49 18.8 B 0.49 13.7 B 0.64 42.1 0.57 11.3 0.57 9.5 (sec/veh) Approach Delay LOS 29.8 C 20.1 C 18.5 B D B 16.8 B A Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Analyst: 'Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0106 Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2/16/01 (970) 669-5034 am m Col ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron All other areas Fort Col ns recent shor long bkgrd tota East/West Street Fossil Creek/Cameron North/South Street College 11 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 tAnalyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 2/16/01 'Period: am� Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent short long bkgr total N/S St: College 1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 ' I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 I 1 2 -1 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L T R I L T R 1 Volume 1130 10 45 140 10 240 12.5, 1220 55 1310 1375 35 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P ' Peds X I Peds X WB Left A 1 SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P ' Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X Right I EB Right 'NB SB Right I WB Right A A Green 26.0 6.0 8.0 49.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 11 it 11 11 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity IEastbound L 389 'TR 483 Westbound _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate__ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS 1297 0.11 0.30 25.4 C 1666 0.08 0.29 25.8 C 25.6 C LT 413 1425 0.17 R 633 1583 0.53 Northbound L 436 1770 0.12 T 1911 3539 0.72 R 855 1583 0.05 'Southbound L 261 1770 0.64 T 1911 3539 0.42 R 855 1583 0.04 Intersection Delay = 15.0 0.29 26.7 C 24.2 C 0.40 23.7 C 0.61 8.5 • A 0.54 14.5 B 14.2 B 0.54 11.0 B 0.61 19.2 B 0.54 10.2 B 11.8 B 0.54 10.9 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Lone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com I_OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Fgency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 2/16/01 Analysis Time Period: m pm Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron !Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd tota Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCs2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 'Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 2/16/01 tPeriod: pm Project D: 0106 E/W St: Fossil.Creek/Cameron 'No. Lanes LGConfig 'Volume Lane.Width RTOR Vol Duration I Eastbound I L T R I 1 1 0 I L TR 140 10 25 112.0 12.0 1 0 .25 Phase Combination i EB Left A Thru A Right A, Peds X WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X Right 'NB SB Right Green 29.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 if C 11 11 it Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Coll' s Year : recent short long bkgrd total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY d Westbound i Northbound I SouE oun L T R I L T R I L T R I 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 LT R I L T R I L T R 155 10 320 150 1305 40 1160 760 30 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 0 1 0 1 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 2 3 4 I NB Left Thru Right i Peds 1 SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 5 6 7 8 A P P P A P P P X A 6.0 54.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 11 APPENDIX E Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 344 1322 0.22 0.26 29.3 C TR 389 1621 0.10 0.24 29.7 C 29.4 C ' Westbound LT 334 1391 0.17 0.24 30.4 C 20.8 C R 712 1583 0.41 0.45 18.9 B Northbound L 380 1770 0.01 0.59 8.4 A TR 2476 5054 0.66 0.49 16.5 B 16.5 B ,Southbound L 429 1770 0.87 0.67 45.1 D TR 2995 5076 0.59 0.59 8.0 A 14.5 B Intersection Delav = 16.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich ,Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Fgency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 2/16 O1 Analysis Time Period: a pm �ntersection: Co ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron rea Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total troject ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/16 O1 Jurisd: Fort Collins 'Period: am Year recent short ong bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY -IEastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I _I __ I_ I ko. Lanes 1 1 1 0 i 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 I LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L TR I L TR I Lolume 170 5 30 150 5 275 15 1495 65 1355 1665 20 I ane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Combination 1 2 3 4 1 ,Phase EB Left A I NB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right Peds kB X I Peds Left A I SB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right Peds X I Peds NB Right I EB Right 'SB Right I WB Right Green 24.0 Yellow 3.0 ,All Red 2.0 5 6 7 8 A P P P X A A P A P A P X A A 6.0 10.0 49.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 413 1291 0.03 0.32 23.3 C ' TR 518 1671 0.03 0.31 24.1 C 23.8 C Westbound LT 435 1402 0.17 0.31 25.3 C 21.9 C R 697 1583 0.53 0.44 21.2 C Northbound 'L 384 1770 0.07 0.59 9.1 A TR 2530 5060 0.69 0.50 16.1 B 16.0 B Southbound L 269 1770 0.72 0.59 30.0 C TR 2521 5042 0.41 0.50 12.5 B 15.3 B Intersection Delay = 16.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/16/01 Analysis Time Period: �pm Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total ' Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 2/16/01 Period: pm Project D: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent short lon bkgr total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 L TR I LT R I L TR 110 5 10 165 5 350 125 1595 55 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 I 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 uomninazion i ,enase EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right 'SB Right Green 31.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 2 �3 4 1 1 NB Left 1 Thru 1 Right Peds 1 SB Left 1 Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 1 EB Right 1 WB Right 1 Southbound 1 L T R I I 1 3 0 L TR 1185 925 55 112.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 7 8 A P P P X A P P P X A 8.0 50.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs APPENDIX D II 'Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 365 1353 ' TR 421 1621 Westbound 0.20 0.27 0.09 0.26 LT 374 1439 0.13 R 712 1583 0.36 Northbound L 367 1770 0.01 T 1734 3539 0.74 R 776 1583 0.07 ISouthbound L 385 1770 0.85 T 2017 3539 0.71 R 902 1583 0.02 ' Intersection Delay = 18.1 28.5 C 28.1 C Approach Delay LOS 28.3 C 0.26 28.5 C 19.9 B 0.45 18.3 B 0.57 9.7 A 0.49 18.8 B 18.6 B 0.49 13.7 B 0.64 42.1 D 0.57 11.2 B 16.8 B 0.57 9.4 A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 ' Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com ■ Analyst: 'Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: 'Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0106 II it Fax: (970) 669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2/16/01 o ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron All other areas Fort Collins recent hort long kgrd total East/West Street Fossil Creek/Cameron North/South Street College ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 'Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 2/16/01 'Period: am m Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron ' No. Lanes LGConfig 'Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound I L T R 1 1 1 0 L TR 170 5 30 112.0 12.0 1 0 Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Coll' s Year : recent short long kgrd total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound i Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 LT R I L T R I L T R 140 5 240 15 1220 55 1310 1360 20 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 0 1 0 1 0 ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A 1 NB Left Thru A I Thru Right A 1 Right Peds X 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left Thru A I Thru ' Right A 1 Right Peds X 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right 'SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 Yellow 3.0 ' All Red 2.0 5 6 7 8 A P P P X A A P A P A P X A A 6.0 8.0 49.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 'Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity 'Eastbound L 396 'TR 485 Westbound _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate _ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS 1321 0.03 0.30 24.7 C 1671 0.03 0.29 25.5 C 'LT 412 1421 0.15 R 633 1583 0.53 Northbound L 437 1770 0.06 T 1911 3539 0.72 R 855 1583 0.05 ISouthbound L 261 1770 0.64 T 1911 3539 0.42 R 855 1583 0.07 , Intersection Delay = 14.8 Approach Delay LOS 25.2 C 0.29 26.5 C 24.2 C 0.40 23.7 C 0.61 8.2 A 0.54 14.5 B 14.3 B 0.54 11.0 B 0.61 19.2 B 0.54 10.2 B 11.7 B 0.54 11.1 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B 1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 t Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com _ ' OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 'Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2 16/01 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron �rea Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Fort Coll" s recent hort long bkgr total ,Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron 'Analyst: Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/16/01 Period- am pm Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent or long kgr total ' Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil. Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ► Eastbound I Westbound ► Northbound ► Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 'No. Lanes I 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L T R I L T R I 110 5 10 155 5 320 125 1305 40. 1160 755 55 1 'Volume Lane Width 112.0 12.0 ( 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0. I 0 I 0 'Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ,EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P ' Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P ' Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right. I EB Right Right I WB Right A 'SB Green 29.0 6.0 54.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 ,4.0 Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 'All Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 11 11 APPENDIX C UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Average TotalDelayserivell_< 10> m 10 and < 20> 20 and _< 35.> 35 and _< 55> 55 and _< 80>80 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 119 1297 0.33 0.09 62.0 E TR 137 1627 0.14 0.08 60.7 E 61.6 E Westbound LT 114 1350 0.30 0.08 62.5 E 52.0 D R 346 1583 0.15 0.22 45.1 D Northbound L 456 1770 0.00 0.85 1.8 A T 2617 3539 0.48 0.74 1.1 A 1.3 A R 1171 1583 0.04 0.74 5.1 A Southbound L 493 1770 0.17 0.85 2.1 A T 2617 3539 0.54 0.74 1.3 A 1.4 A R 1171 1583 0.01 0.74 4.9 A Intersection Delay = 4.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/16/01 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Year: ecen short long bkgrd total ,Analysis Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College 1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 2/16/01 UPPeriod: am a) roject ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron Inter.:'College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year ecent short long bkgrd total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound b d I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I No. Lanes LGConfig I L TR (Volume 137 3 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I Duration 0.25 c:omnination i �Phase EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A ' Right A Peds X NB Right SB Right Green 12.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 11 It If R] 15 ,3 West oun L T R I L T R I L T R 1 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 LT R I L T R I L T R 130 2 49 12 1197 49 179 1332 10 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 0 1 0 1 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 2 3 4 I NB Left Thru 1 Right 1 Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right 1 WB Right 5 6 7 8 A P P P X A P P P X A 14.0 105.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 142.0 secs 11 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS Eastbound L 110 1206 0.04 0.09 58.9 E rTR 134 1583 0.04 0.08 59.9 E 59.5 E Westbound 'LT 115 1365 0.35 R. 346 1583 0.26 Northbound rL 666 1770 0.01 T 2617 3539 0.51 R 1171 1583 0.03 ISouthbound L 470 1770 0.09 T 2617 3539 0.30 R 1171 1583 0.02 1 Intersection Delay = 4.2 0.08 63.1 E 51.5 D 0.22 46.4 D 0.85 1.8 A 0.74 1.2 A 1.3 A 0.74 5.0 A 0.85 2.0 0.74 0.7 0.74 4.9 (sec/veh) A A 0.9 A A Intersection LOS = A rHCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich rMatthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Lone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com IOPERATIONAL ANALYSIS (970) 669-5034 Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ,Date Performed: 2/16/01 Analysis Time Period: (g)pm. Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron ,Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fo Collins Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College r 11 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 2/16/01 Period: 051t> ' pm I D• Project 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron No. Lanes LGConfig 1 Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol tDuration Eastbound L T R I 1 1 L TR 14 0 112.0 12.0 1 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A ' Right A Peds X NB Right SB Right Green 12.0 Yellow 3.0 ' All Red 2.0 If 11 C 0 N Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recen short long bkgrd total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 LT R 1 L T R 136 2 86 19 1277 37 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 0 I 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 2 3 4 I 1 NB Left Thru 1 Right 1 Peds SB Left 1 Thru Right 1 Peds 1 EB Right 1 WB Right Southbound L T R I 1 2 1 L T R 142 739 24 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 7 8 A P P P X A P P P X A 14.0 105.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 142.0 secs 11 APPENDIX B 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 = M M M M M M M m M M 1111110 M M = M M m M MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO-80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 2-7-01 Observer: Michael Day: Wednesday City: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: US287IFosell CreeldCafneron S = straight I = loft film Time Northbound: US287 Southbound: US287 Total Eastbound: Cameron Westbound: Fossil Creek Total Total —LTS FR Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total Begins northisouth east1west All 7:30 0 1281 1 8 p 12 175 3 t 479 0 0 3 711-14 12 0 18 30 33 512 7:45 1 332 3 'Nil 5 167 5 tw all, 513 0 1 8 1 26 11 w 8:00 3 376 8 13 209 10 aw-RIO, 1Z 619 0� 0 1 2 0 27 30 649 8:15 5 288 18 W 12 188 6 of 517 517 3 0 1 21111111 1 . - 14 7:304:30 1� 1323Ly 805 2128 10 124 34 2262 s. PHF 0.85 0.87 0.63 -0.89 4:30 1 263 13 g, 17,1285 1 3 f 582 8 1 4 11 1 19 826 11, MCI, , 4:45 1 321 10 Al EDP 25 342 5 INV 704 5 1 5 V'H gti 7 0 13 31 735 A fA 5:00 0 325 15 20 373 1 11 734 15 1 3 1 ffi§00 7. 1 9 36 7.70 5:15 0 288 11 5' 17 332 1 '6 649 9 0 3 VR 5 0 8 3' 25 674 4:30-5:30 0 1248 1 1 � t"k ZA 1421 2669 55 81 136 2805 PHFJ 1 0.92 0.9 0.72 Lid APPENDIX A IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Redtail PDP development on the short range and long range street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: The development of the Redtail PDP is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Redtail PDP will generate approximately 1134 daily trip ends, 128 morning peak hour trip ends, and 138 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Current operation at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection is acceptable. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better. It is expected that no additional traffic signals will be warranted, due to the existing signal at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. - In the short range future, given full development of the Redtail PDP and an increase in background traffic, the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out intersections will operate acceptably. - In the long range future, given full development of the Redtail PDP, the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. The ' short range and long range geometry is shown in Figures 10 and 11, respectively. - Acceptable level of service is achieved for bicycle and transit modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines. With. regard to pedestrian level of service, gaps in the sidewalk system should be filled in by adjacent property ■ owners. 21 commercial area north of the site, the commercial/office area northeast of the site, and the residential area (Fossil Creek) east of the site. This site is in an area type termed "transit corridor" and "other." The level of service determination assumes that future developments will build their streets in accordance with Fort Collins Standards. This being the case, pedestrian facilities will exist adjacent to vacant property. This is a reasonable assumption. The sidewalk system in the area along Fossil Creek was never developed. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix G. The minimum level of service for "transit corridor" is B for all categories, except for the visual interest & amenities category where it is LOS C. The minimum level of service for "other" is C for all measured categories. The primary concern with regard to pedestrian level of service is the discontinuity of the sidewalk system. Much of the area was developed in Larimer County, and as such, sidewalks were neither required nor built. It is incumbent upon the adjacent property owner to build sidewalks where they do not currently exist. Bicycle Level of Service ' Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are no destination areas within 1320 feet of the Redtail PDP. The Bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix G, which indicates that the base connectivity is acceptable at level of service C. Transit Level of Service Currently, there is limited transit service in the area. In the future, transit service will be improved. In the future, there will be 20 minute transit service on College Avenue. It is anticipated that the level of service will be in the D category with implementation of the City's Transit Development Plan. A future transit level of service worksheet is provided in Appendix G. 20 Carr :,reek -.a-- - Denotes Lane LONG RANGE (2020) GEOMETRY pw Figure 11 19 Carr Creek . — - Denotes Lane SHORT RANGE (2005) GEOMETRY N Figure 10 18 TABLE 5 Short Range Total Peak Hour Operation y .iceNOW T lV kp� ...d Ss'1 FiF Nn G B B College/Fossil Creek/Cameron OVERALL (signal) College/RT-in/RT-out EB RT A A (stop sign) TABLE 6 Long Range Total Peak Hour Operation College/Fossil Creek/Cameron OVERALL B B (signal) College/RT-in/RT-out EB RT A A (stop sign) 17 ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8 and the recommended geometrics, the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out intersections operate in the short range total condition as indicated in Table 5. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The key intersections will operate acceptably. ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9 and recommended geometrics, the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out intersections operate in the long range total condition as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably. The short range and long range geometry is shown in Figures 10 and 11, respectively. The existing cross section of College Avenue is wide enough to provide for 2 through lanes in each direction, a center median for designated left -turn lanes, and a wide shoulder that is striped with right -turn auxiliary lanes at appropriate locations. It is classified as an NR-A Highway. Using the State Highway Access Code (1998) as the reference, the right -turn auxiliary lanes should be 500 feet long including a bay taper at 15:1. The left -turn lanes must also provide for this same deceleration length plus the ability to store potential left -turn queues. In the short range future, the northbound storage length is 50 feet and the southbound storage length is 300 feet. A northbound right -turn acceleration lane is required for traffic entering College Avenue from westbound Fossil Creek Parkway. This lane already exists and would not be the responsibility of the Redtail PDP. The southbound storage length is required due to the forecasted traffic with the connection of Fossil Creek Parkway between College Avenue and Lemay Avenue. Once this connection is made, actual traffic counts should be used to determine the southbound left -turn storage length. -There is a significant north to south decreasing grade on College Avenue north of the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. Adjustments to the deceleration length should be made, as appropriate. In the long range future, the Fort Collins Master Street Plan indicates that College Avenue has three through lanes in each direction. The right -turning volumes are not high enough to require separate right -turn lanes at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron or College/RT-in/RT-out intersections with the six -lane cross section. The left -turn storage lengths described earlier are sufficient in the long range future. Since there is enough width on Cameron Drive, it is recommended in both the short range and long range futures that an eastbound left -turn lane and a through/right- turn lane be striped on Cameron Drive. The westbound geometry on Fossil Creek Parkway can remain as it exists currently. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix G shows a map of the area that i s TABLE 3 Short Range Background Peak Hour Operation J r y Y� IIM- nd MINIM Ylh'K:'sI 9 a ..... r• !4 R �i n+ F Y + „�'. .. .. ,. �v� l`v"+, .n B B College/Fossil Creek/Cameron OVERALL (signal) TABLE 4 I Long Range Background Peak Hour Operation College/Fossil Creek/Cameron I OVERALL I B I B (signal) 15 to LO O N O O N � O �- O JI RT-in/RT-out 5/15 0 0 LO co to M 350/275 o a � It° °' + 10/10 65/50 Cameron 40/130 10/10 25/45 Ul) to LO o v QQ to to LO 0 AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Fossil Creek N Figure 9 14 L0 O ti O N Lf) 09 O JI RT-in/RT-out 5/15 r� O � � M 320/240 o 10/10 55/40 Can 40/130 1 10/10 —y 25/45 uO O ,n o N o LO v LO M AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles SHORT RANGE (2005) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Fossil Creek n d Figure 8 13 Carr m E, reek Fil k Ti a MA SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N Figure 7 12 Cameron d 0 coLO o°U*) N � 350/275 Un rn �— 5/5 65/50 10/70 5/5 —w-- LO U") LO 10/30 N v Ul) LO Ln to AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles LONG RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Fossil Creek N Figure 6 11 Cameron 0 0 Coo O M 320/240 5/5 J j � ,— 55/40 1WO --)� t T 5/5 —� �n o LO 10/30 N NLO o 0 M T- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles SHORT RANGE (2005) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Fossil Creek AhL Figure 5 10 Background Traffic Projections Figures 5 and 6 show the respective short range and long range background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range and long range future horizons were obtained by contacting Fort Collins Transportation Planning Staff and reviewing the Huntington Hills Apartments traffic study prepared for this area of Fort Collins. The peak hour traffic was increased to reflect the connection of Fossil Creek Parkway between College Avenue and Lemay Avenue. In addition, there are five office buildings on Coronado Court that were approved a number of years ago within the Fossil Creek Office Park, but have not yet been built. The background traffic includes the generated traffic from these yet unbuilt office buildings. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 7 shows the site generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 8 shows the total (site plus background) short range peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Figure 9 shows the total long range morning and afternoon peak hour traffic at the key intersections. It should be noted, due to the right- in/right-out access to College Avenue, a portion of the existing Fossil Creek Office Park traffic will utilize this access. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Signal warrant analyses were not required due to the existing signal at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. operation Analysis Capacity analyses were performed at the College/Fossil Creek/ ' Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year 2005 condition. The long range analysis reflects a year 2020 condition. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5, the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection operates in the short range background condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix C. The key intersection will operate acceptably during the peak hours. I ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6, the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection operates in the long range background condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses ' are provided in Appendix D. The key intersection will operate acceptably during the peak hours. ' 9 0 �o Site U I I ICameron L_-J 0 M OFFICE LO cm I o Site I I U ICameron L__J 0 0 M TRIP DISTRIBUTION 5% ---------- Fossil Creek _ 5%Am— _ Fossil Creek RESIDENTIAL IM N Figure 4 8 1 ' SITE PLAN 1 [► OM-147_ 4:4 N CREEK WAY Figure 3 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Redtail. PDP is an office and residential development, located west of College Avenue near the existing Cameron Park and developing Fossil Creek Office Park in Fort Collins. Figure 3 shows a site plan of the Redtail PDP. The site plan shows primary access via the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. Right-in/right-out access is also shown at a location approximately 725 feet north of the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. This is the existing access to the Mill Brothers Nursery property. This access is shown on the adopted "South College Avenue Access Control Study/Plan," 1988. This access is also shown on the "South College Avenue Access Control Plan Update" which is currently going through the public review process. The short range analysis (Year 2005) includes development of the Redtail PDP and an appropriate increase in background traffic. The long range analysis year is considered to be 2020. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6`" Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at this site. The proposal is for eight office buildings of 7,000 square feet each, eight apartment buildings with eight units in each, and two apartment buildings with seven units in each. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. TABLE 2 Trip Generation WIN 710 Office 56.0 KSF 11.01 617 1.37 77 0.19 11 0.25 14 1.24 75 220 Apartment 78 D.U. 6.63 517 0.08 6 0.43 34 0.42 33 0.20 16 Total 1134 83 45 47 91 Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Redtail PDP based upon the distribution of the existing traffic volumes and the location of trip productions for these types of land uses. Figure 4 shows the trip distributions used for both the office and residential uses. C Existing Operation The College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection was evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. The peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual is also provided in Appendix B. The key intersection operates acceptably during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better. Experience indicates that if level of service D can be achieved during the peak hours, operation will be at level of service C or better for 20-22 hours of an average weekday. TABLE 7 Current Peak Hour Operation «MW College/Fossil Creek/Cameron OVERALL A A (signal) Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities in this area are sporadic. Sidewalks exist in the developing Fossil Creek Office Park. Sidewalks also exist adjacent to the commercial/office uses north and northeast of the site. There are no sidewalks along Fossil Creek Parkway or on Cameron Drive, within Cameron Park. This site is within 1320 feet of: existing residential areas east of the site _ and existing commercial/office uses east, north, and northeast of the site. While there are residential uses to the west, within 1320 feet of this site, they are not accessible due to the railroad tracks. Bicycle Facilities There are bicycle facilities along College Avenue. Along Fossil Creek Parkway bike lanes are not striped, however there is sufficient width for bicycles to operate safely. There are no bike lanes on Cameron Drive, since it is a local street. Transit Facilities The Fox Trot is within College Avenue from Harmony provides year-round service 7:00pm. 1320 feet of this site. It operates along Road, south into Loveland. The Fox Trot on 60 minute headways between 6:15am and 5 N cm 0 U N M O � O \ — 86/49 IVM N IN fl- v --w-2/2 36/30 Cameron 4/37 —J' Fossil Creek 1 0/3 —► I(" rn v 6/15 ti M ti N AM/PM RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 4 N 0 U Harmon Redtail DP E J Cameron T m° r 04 N co Trilby 11 SCALE: 1"=2000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 11 3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Redtail PDP is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be. presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily commercial/office and residential. Commercial/office uses exist adjacent to the site, to the north, and to the.northeast across College Avenue. Residential uses exist east of the site across College Avenue. The center of Fort Collins lies to the north of the Redtail PDP. Roads The primary streets near the Redtail PDP site are College Avenue, Fossil Creek Parkway, and Cameron Drive. College Avenue is to the east of the Redtail PDP. It is a north -south street designated as an arterial in the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. In this area, College Avenue has a four -lane cross section with a center left -turn median and right -turn auxiliary lanes. There are northbound/southbound left -turn lanes and a northbound/southbound right -turn lanes on College Avenue, approaching Fossil Creek Parkway and Cameron Drive. The existing speed limit in this area is 50 mph. The College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection has signal control Fossil Creek Parkway is east of the Redtail PDP. It is an east - west street designated as a collector on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it is has a two-lane cross section with a wide raised center median. The westbound approach to College Avenue has a left- turn/through lane and a right -turn lane. Fossil Creek Parkway lines up with Cameron Drive, which is west of College Avenue. By/before the short range (2005) future, it is expected that Fossil Creek Parkway will be extended east, to Lemay Avenue. Cameron Drive is west of the Redtail PDP and will serve as an access to the site. Cameron Drive is an east -west street designated as a local street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. In this area, Cameron Drive has a two-lane cross section. The eastbound approach to College Avenue has a left -turn lane and a through/right-turn lane. These lanes are not striped, however they function as mentioned above. There is an unnamed frontage road just (251) west of College Avenue. This road will serve the office portion of the Redtail PDP. Existing Traffic Recent peak hour counts at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection are shown in Figure 2. Raw traffic count data is provided in Appendix A. The traffic data at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection was collected in February 2001. 2 I. INTRODUCTION This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development known as the Redtail PDP. The Redtail PDP is located west of College Avenue near the existing Cameron Park in Fort Collins, Colorado. Cameron Park is an established office park that is on both sides of Cameron Drive. There are signs indicating the developing Fossil Creek Office Park located just north of Cameron Park. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultant (VF Ripley Associates), the project developer (Lagunitas Companies), the Fort Collins Transportation Planning Staff, and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering Staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 4 3. Site Plan ............................................ 7 4. Trip Distribution .................................... 8 5. Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 10 6. Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Traffic ....... 11 7. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ..................... 12 8. Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........... 13 9. Long Range (2020) Total Peak -Hour Traffic ............ 14. 10. Short Range (2005) Geometry .......................... 18 11. Long Range (2020) Geometry ........................... 19 APPENDIX A Recent Peak Hour Traffic B Current Peak Hour operation/Level of Service Descriptions C Short Range Background Traffic Operation D Long Range Background Traffic operation E Short Range Total Traffic Operation F Long Range Total Traffic Operation G Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Roads................................................ 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 2 ExistingOperation ................................... 5 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 5 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 5 Transit Facilities ................................... 5 III. Proposed Development ................................. 6 Trip Generation ...................................... 6 Trip Distribution .................................... 6 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 9 TripAssignment ...................................... 9 SignalWarrants ...................................... 9 Operation Analysis ................................... 9 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 16 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 20 Transit Level of Service ............................. 20 Iv. Conclusions .......................................... 21 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 5 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 6 3. Short Range Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation ... 15 4. Long Range Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation .... 15 5. Short Range Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation ........ 17 6. Long Range Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation ......... 17 REDTAIL PDP TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO FEBRUARY 2001 Prepared for: Lagunitas Companies 3950 JFK Parkway, Bldg. 12 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034