The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutREDTAIL RESIDENTIAL - PDP - 26-01 - REPORTS - TRAFFIC STUDY (5)HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E Date: 2/16/01 Period:. am p Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound 1 L T R I L TR 170 5 30 112.0 12.0 1 0 Duration 0.2 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A. Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right SB Right Green 24.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent short 4zRGiDtotal N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound i Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 I LT R I L TR I L TR i 150 5 275 15. 1495 65 1355 1665 20 I 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations_ 2 3 4 1 1 NB Left 1 Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 1 SB Left 1 Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 1 EB Right 1 WB Right 5 6 7 8 A P P P X A A P A P A P X A A 6.0 10.0 49.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst:. matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 12/17/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: college/fairway Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary,-,.-,, r Analysis Year, 200 2020 bakgrd CLSts Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: fairway lane North/South Street: college Intersection Orientation: NS Study period'(hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 1515 15 30 1655 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 1594 15 31 1742 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -' Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 35 0 40 35 0 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 36 0 42 36 0 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration LT R L T R Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L L I LT R I L T R v (vph) 21 31 36 42 36 0 26 C(m) (vph) 356 411 68 334 57 57 298 v/c 0.06 0.08 0.53 0.13 0.63 0.00 0.09 95% queue length 0.19 0.24 2.18 0.43 2.59 0.00 0.28 Control Delay 15.7 14.5 106.4 17.3 142.8 68.2 18.2 LOS C B F C F F C Approach Delay 58.4 90.6 Approach LOS F F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 413 1291 0.03 0.32 23.3 C TR 518 1671 0.03 0.31 24.1 C 23.8 C Westbound LT 435 1402 0.17 0.31 25.3 C 21.9 C R 697 1583 0.53 0.44 21.2 C Northbound L 384 1770 0.07 0.59 9.1 A TR 2530 5060 0.69 0.50 16.1 B 16.0 B Southbound L 269 1770 0.72 0.59 30.0 C TR 2521 5042 0.41 0.50 12.5 B 15.3 B Intersection Delay = 16.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/16/01 Analysis Time Period: <�pm Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College Site Cameron m a U ` Fairway 20/9 ---/ 1 0 N cf) J N O � N 0/1 --v-1 /2 Fossil Creek 23/16 2/1 — 10/8 �— AM/PM 41 N SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 c ill Cameron Fairway -.@*— - Denotes Lane Fossil Creek N LONG RANGE (2020) GEOMETRY Figure 9 Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 18 LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian , Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet T,c,a�vsit Fi(c�r-try �OGS �UOr CKIST City of Port Collins Transportation Master Plan APPENDIX E HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/17/01 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: College/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short lon bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound ' Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1360 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1431 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume 1� Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 15 C(m) (vph) 810 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.06 Control Delay 9.5 LOS A Approach Delay 9.5 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 17/O1 Analysis Time Period. am pm intersection: ollege/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgrd total Project Ib: 0106 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5' 6 L T R I L T R Volume lv� Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly F1ow'Rate, HFR 824 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 ,.Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 10 C(m) (vph) 922 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.03 Control Delay 8.9 LOS A Approach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 379 1149 0.56 0.33 29.31 C T 627 1900 0.03 0.33 22.7 C 27.7 'C R 533 1615 0.12 0.33 23.5 C Westbound L 468 1419 0.22 0.33 24.5 C TR 542 1641 0.32 0.33 25.4 C 25.1 C Northbound L 275 1805 0.23 0.57 19.1 B TR 2320 5155 0.82 0.45 27.2 C 27.0 C Southbound L 275 1805 0.38 0.57 17.8 B TR 2312 5137 0.93 0.45 33.9 C 33.1 C Intersection Delay = 29.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Phone: Fax: E-Mail: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0106 fairway matt mj dpe 12/17/01 am college/fairway All other areas fort collins (ETD East/West Street North/South Street college 6 Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Gr CaDacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 322 1288 0.34 0.25 31.4 T 475 1900 0.02 0.25 28.3 R 404 1615 0.08 0.25 28.8 Westbound L 357 1426 0.12 0.25 29.1 TR 411 1642 0.28 0.25 30.6 Northbound L 343 1805 0.17 0.65 8.2 TR 2728 5148 0.78 0.53 21.0 Southbound L 275 1805 0.38 0.65 15.9 TR 2709 5111 0.48 0.53 15.4 Intersection Delay = 19.6 (sec/veh) Phone: E-Mail: Approach Delay LOS C 30.7 C C C C 30.2 C A C 20.7 C B B 15.4 B Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0106 fairway Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS matt mjdpe 12/17/01 pm college/fairway All other areas f, collins 202 East/West Street North/South Street college HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: matt Agency: mjdpe Date: 17/01 Period: am pm Project 0106 E/W St: fairway Inter.: college/fairway Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: fort collins Year N/S St: college INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ _ _SIGNALIZED Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R 1 L T R No. Lanes 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR Volume 1105 10 30 140 10 100 155 1915 100 .Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A 1 NB Left Thru A 1 Thru Right A I Right Peds X I Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left Thru A 1 Thru Right A ( Right Peds X 1 Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 25.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 I Southbound I L T R I I 1 3 0 I L TR 1100 1105 120 112.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 7 A P P P X A P P P X 12.0 53.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C. Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 310 1193 0.29 TR 387 1613 0.12 Westbound LT 339 1412 0.19 R 712 1583 0.41 Northbound L 339 1770 0.05 TR 2476 5054 0.67 Southbound L 429 1770 0.87 TR .2988 5065 0.60 Intersection Delay = 16.3 0.26 30.1 C 0.24 29.9 C 30.0 C 0.24 30.5 C 21.0 C 0.45 18.9 B 0.59 8.6 A 0.49 16.5 B 16.5 B 0.67 45.2 D 0.59 8.2 A 14.5 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000:,Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/16 01 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short on bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E Date: 2/16/01 Period: am Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R I I 1 1 0 L TR 185 5 40 112.0 12.0 1 0 Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent short lon bkgrd total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I I 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 I LT R I L TR 150 10 275 115 1505 65 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A I NB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right Peds X I Peds WB Left A I SB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right Peds X I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 24.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 I Southbound I L T R I i 1 3 0 I L TR 1355 1670 45 112.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 .7 8 A P P P X A A P A P A P X A A 6.0 10.0 49.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate rrn Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound Approach Delay LOS L 400 1251 0.09 0.32 23.9 C , TR 520 1679 0.06 0.31 24.3 C 24.1 C Westbound LT 428 1382 0.17 0.31 25.3 C 21.9 C R 697 1583 0.53 0.44 21.2 C Northbound L 379 1770 0.08 0.59 9.2 A TR 2530 5060 0.69 0.50 16.2 B 16.0 B Southbound L 269 1770 0.74 0.59 32.0 C TR 2518 5036 0.42 0.50 12.6 B 15.7 B Intersection Delay = 16.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 34,16101 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short lon bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E Date: 2/16/01 Period: pm Project D: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R I 1 1 1 0 L TR 135 10 .20 112.0 12.0 1 0 'Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent short ong bkgrd total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I I _ 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 LT R I L TR 165 5 350 130 1600 55 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 1 0 Southbound I L T R I I I 1 1 3 0 I 1 L TR I 1190 935 65 112.0 12.0 I 1 0 i Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations _ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A 1 SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right i EB Right SB Right ( WB Right A Green 31.0 8.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs APPENDIX.D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/�17/O1 Analysis Time Period: am �m Intersection: College/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgr .total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1700 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1789 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 Configuration T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 5 C(m) (vph) 752 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 Control Delay 9.8 LOS A Approach Delay 9.8 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/17/01 Analysis Time Period pm Intersection: College/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgr total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 980 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1031 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes, 2 1 ,Configuration T R ',Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R- Volume 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared.Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config Queue Length, and Level of Service SB Westbound Eastbound 4 i 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 I I R v (vph) 10 C(m) (vph) 884 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.03 Control Delay 9.1 LOS A Approach Delay 9.1 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 17/01 Analysis Time Period: tlege/fairway pm Intersection: Jurisdiction: fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2005 2020 bakgrd Project.ID: 0106 East/West Street: fairway lane North/South Street: college Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound . Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 1620 30 30 965 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 1705 31 31 1015 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 0 25 35 0 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 0 26 36 0 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: -Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration LT R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I L T R v (vph) 10 31 15 26 36 0 5 C(m) (vph) 682 368 75 307 122 76 515 v/c 0.01 0.08 0.20 0.08 0.30 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.04 0.27 0.69 0.28 1.14 0.00 0.03 Control Delay 10.4 15.7 64.6 17.8 46.4 52.4 12.1 LOS B C F C E F B Approach Delay 34.9 42.2 Approach LOS D E HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 350 1296 0.25 .0.27 29.0 C TR 419 1613 0.11 0.26 28.3 C 28.8 C Westbound LT 381 1464 0.14 0.26 28.6 C 20.1 C R 712 1583 0.36 0.45 18.3 B Northbound L 344 1770 0.05 0.57 10.0+ B T 1734 3539 0.75 0.49 19.0 B 18.7 B R 776 1583 0.07 0.49 13.7 B Southbound L 382 1770 0.85 0.64 43.6 D T 2017 3539 0.71 0.57 11.2 B 17.0 B R 902 1583 0.05 0.57 ._9.6 A Intersection Delay = 18.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/16/01 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent shor long bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 2/16/01 Period: am pm Project ID: 106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron Eastbound L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 1 LGConfig 1 L TR Volume 185 5 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right SB Right Green 26.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 40 A Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Coll.Las Year : recent hort long bkgrd total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I I - I — 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 LT R I L T R I L T R 140 10 240 115 1230 55 1310 1365 45 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 0 1 0 1 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 2 3 4 1 1 NB Left 1 Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 1 SB Left i Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 1 EB Right I WB Right 5 6 7 8 A P P P X A A P A P A P X A A 6.0 8.0 49.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 383 1277 0.10 0.30 25.3 C TR 487 1679 0.07 0.29 25.8 C 25.5 C Westbound LT 406 1401 0.16 0.29 26.6 C 24.2 C R 633 1583 0.53 0.40 23.7 C Northbound L 434 1770 0.07 0.61 8.3 A T 1911 3539 0.72 0.54 14.5 B 14.3 B R 855 1583 0.05 0.54 11.0 B Southbound L 260 1770 0.67 0.61 20.6 C T 1911 3539 0.42 0.54 10.3. B 12.1 B R 855 1583 0.08 0.54 11.2 B Intersection Delay = 15.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/16/01 Analysis Time Period: pm. Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent (!Er;) short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College I HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 2101 Period: am p pm Project 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron Eastbound L T R I No. Lanes I 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR Volume 135 10 20 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent OEort long bkgrd total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 LT R I L T R I L T R I 155 5 320 130 1310 40 1165 765 65 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 i 1 0 1 0 1 0 i Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A I NB Left Thru A I Thru Right A i Right Peds X I Peds WB Left A ( SB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right Peds X I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 29.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 5 6 7 A P P P X A P P P X A 6.0 54.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs APPENDIX C Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 379 1149 0.53 0.33 28.6 C T 627 1900 0.03 0.33 22.7 C 27.1 C R 533 1615 0.12 0.33 23.5 C Westbound L 468 1419 0.22 0.33 24.5 C TR 542 1641 0.32 0.33 25.4 C 25.1 C Northbound L 275 1805 0.19 0.57 18.5 B .TR 2319 5154 0.81 0.45, 27.0 C 26.8 C Southbound L 275 1805 0.38 0.57 17.6 B TR 2312 5138 0.91 0.45 32.1 C 31.4 C Intersection Delay = 28.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Phone: E-Mail: Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: .Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0106 fairway Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS matt mjdpe 12/17/01 am (� college/fairway All other areas f t Collins 20 East/West Street North/South Street college HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Analyst: matt Agency: mjdpe Date: 12/17/01 Period:. am p Project ID: 0106 E/W St: fairway Inter.: college/fairway Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: fort collins Year cZT2--'O f N/S St: college SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes I 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 I 1 1 1 LGConfig. I L T R I L TR 1 L TR Volume 1190 15 60 1100 15 150 150 1710 75 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations___ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A I NB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right Peds X ( Peds WB Left A I SB Left Thru A I Thru Right A I Right Peds X 1 Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right i WB Right Green 33.0 Yellow 3.0. All Red 2.0 Southbound I L T R 1 3 0 I L TR 1100 1865 125 112.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 7 8 A P P P X A P P P X 12.0 45.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Capacity Flow Rate (s) g/C _ Delay LOS Delay LOS v/c Grp Eastbound L 322 1288 0.28 0.25 30.7 C T 475 1900 0.02 0.25 28.3 C 30.0 C R 404 1615 0.08 0.25 28.8 C Westbound L 357 1426 0.12 0.25 29.1 C TR 411 1642 0.28 0.25 30.6 C 30.2 C Northbound L 346 1805 0.15 0.65 8.1 A .TR 2728 5148 0.77 0.53 20.8 C 20.4 C Southbound L 275 1805 0.38 0.65 15.7 B TR 2708 5110 0.47 0.53 15.3 B 15.3 B Intersection Delay = 19.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a Phone: Fax: E-Mail: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0106 fairway matt mj dpe 12/17/01 am pm ollege/fairway All other areas fort collins East/West Street North/South Street college Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios. Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 344 1322 0.22 0.26 29.3 TR 389 1621 0.10 0.24 29.7 Westbound LT 334 1391 0.17 0.24 30.4 R. 712 1583 0.41 0.45 18.9 Northbound L 380 1770 0.01 0.59 8.4 TR 2476 5054 0.66 0.49 16.5 Southbound L 429 1770 0.87 0.67 45.1 TR 2995 5076 0.59 0.59 8.0 Intersection Delay = 16.2 (sec/veh) C C C B A B Approach Delay LOS 29.4 C 20.8 C 16.5 B D A 14.5 B Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/16 O1 Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: Co ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 2/16/01 Period:�pm Project TD: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 Eastbound L T R I 1 1 0 I L TR I10 5 10 112.0 12.0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right SB Right Green 31.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent short lon bkgr total N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound I L T R I L T R I I 1 0 1 1 I 1 3 0 1 LT R I L TR 165 5 350 125 1595 55 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 0 1 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 2 3 4 I I NB Left I Thru I Right I Peds I SB Left I Thru I Right I Peds EB Right I WB Right 5 6 A P P P X A P P P X I Southbound I I L T R I I _ I I 1 3 0 I I L TR I 1185 925 55 1 112.0 12.0 i 1 0 I A 8.0 50.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length 7 ,8 100.0 secs APPENDIX B -; HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 12/11 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: col ege/fairway Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2005 2020 bakgrd Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: fairway lane North/South Street: college Intersection Orientation: NS total Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6' L T R i L T R Volume 10 1500 15 30 1615 25 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 1578 15 31 1700 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 35 0 40 25 0 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 36 0 42 26 0 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0 1 1 LT R No 1 1 1 L T R No Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I L T R v (vph) 10 31 36 42 26 0 26 C(m) (vph) 371 417 74 338 61 62 308 v/c 0.03 0.07 0.49 0.12 0.43 0.00 0.08 95% queue length 0.08 0.24 2.00 0.42 1.63 0.00 0.27 Control Delay 15.0- 14.3 93.0 17.2 102.2 63.1 17.8 LOS B B F C F F C Approach Delay 52.2 60.0 Approach LOS F F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 17/01 Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: college/fairway Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customar Analysis Year: 2005 2020 Dgrdtotal Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: fairway lane North/South Street: college Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 1595 30 30 945 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1678 31 31 994 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 0 25 15 0 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 0 26 15 0 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration LT R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Movement Lane Config NB 1 L SB 4 17 L I Westbound 8 LT 9 1 R I Eastbound 10 11 L T 12 R v (vph) 5 31 15 26 15 0 5 C(m) (vph) 695 377 78 313 128 80 524 v/c 0.01 0.08 0.19 0.08 0.12 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.27 0.66 0.27 0.39 0.00 0.03' Control Delay 10.2 15.4, 61.8 17.5 36.8 50.0 11.9 LOS B C F C E E B Approach Delay 33.7 30.6 Approach LOS D D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 365 1353 0.20 0.27 28.5 C TR 421 1621 0.09 0.26 28.1 C 28.3 C Westbound LT 374 1439 0.13 0.26 28.5 C 19.9 B R 712 1583 0.36 0.45 18.3 B Northbound L 367 1770 0.01 0.57 9.7 A T 1734 3539 0.74 0.49 18.8 B 18.6 B R 776 1583 0.07 0.49 13.7 B Southbound L 385 1770 0.85 0.64 42.1 D T 2017 3539 0.'71 0.57 11.2 B 16.8 B R 902 1583 0.02 0.57 9.4 A Intersection Delay = 18.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/16/01 Analysis'Time Period: p Intersection: o ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short long <EEd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: 2/16/01 am m Jurisd: Year Fort Coll' s recent short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes I 1 1 0 i 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 I LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L T R i L T R I Volume 170 5 30 140 5 240 15 1220 55 1310 1360 20 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A A P Thru A 1 Thru A P Right A 1 Right A P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right ' SB Right I WB Right A A Green 26.0 6.0 8.0 49.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary _ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 396 1321 0.03 0.30 24.7 C TR 485 1671 0.03 0.29 25.5 C 25.2 C Westbound LT 412 1421 0.15 0.29 26.5 C 24.2 C R 633 1583 0.53 0.40 23.7 C Northbound L 437 1770 0.06 0.61 8.2 A T 1911 3539 0.72 0.54 14.5 B 14.3 B R 855 1583 0.05 0.54 11.0 B Southbound L 261 1770 0.64 0.61 19.2 B T 1911 3539 0.42 0.54 10.2 B 11.7 B R 855 1583 0.07 0.54 11.1 B Intersection Delay = 14.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: .(970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 66975034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii-com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2 16/01 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Col s Analysis Year: recent hort long bkgr total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street North/South Street Fossil Creek/Cameron College HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Analyst: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Agency: 2/16/O1 Date: 2/ Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent or long bkgr total Period Campm Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ► Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 0 ► 0 -► 1 1 ► 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 I L T R I L T R I LGConfig 1 L TR I - 5 10 155 LT R I 5 320 125 1.305 40 1160 755 55 1 Volume 110 Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 102A Lane 0 I 0 I 0 I RTOR Vol I Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X NB Right SB Right Green 29.0 Yellow 3.0 All Red 2.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 7 8 2 3 4 i 5 6 1 NB Left A P 1 Thru P ► Right P ► Peds X 1 SB Left A P 1 Thru P i Right P I Peds x 1 EB Right . WB Right A 6.0 54.0 0.0 4.0 0..0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs APPENDIX A 105/200 10/15 —m- 30/60 T T. JU') 10/5 o � (D Lo ') = M U) M O CO a T f 1 100/150 10/15 40/100 r o Ln Ln C1e N tz Ln ti O Lo oLO � T T 350/275 + 5/10 65/50 Cameron ` 35/85 10/5 Ln ,n LO 20/40 0 T- to M O to O T Fairway f- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Fossil Creek LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8 Fairway J!! -.a— -Denotes Lane Fossil Creek N SHORT RANGE (2005) GEOMETRY Figure 7 TABLE Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Operation College/Fossil Creek/Cameron (signal) OVERALL B B College/Fairway (stop sign) WB LTIT F F WB RT C C WB APPROACH D F EB LT E F. EBT F F EB RT B C EB APPROACH E F NB LT B C SB LT C B College/RT-in/RT-out (stop sign) EB RT A A TABLE 6 Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation Az. IM M M Nat PIR i M -- 9 -- I NO College/Fossil Creek/Cameron OVERALL B B (signal) College/Fairway OVERALL B C (signal) College/RT-in/RT-out EB RT A A (stop sign) Cameron N c 0 � U O O CC) O co LO o 25/40 T CD M -00— 0/0 + � � 15/35 35/35 010 i 0 LO LO 5/25 o �' o T ('7 O N co 81- T T O CO O O1 10/5 co 0 320/240 5/10 + � � 55/40 35/85 T 10/5 —► Ul) o LO 20/40 o N o T M T Fairway �— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Fossil Creek SHORT RANGE (2005) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 TABLE 2 Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour Operation Lq College/Fossil Creek/Cameron (signal) OVERALL B B WB LT/T F F WB RT C C WB APPROACH D F EB LT E F College/Fairway (stop sign) EB T E F EB RT B C EB APPROACH D F NB LT B B SB LT C B TABLE 3 Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation �ffi yGiMMZ OVERALL B B College/Fossil Creek/Cameron (signal) College/Fairway OVERALL B C (signal) I I 85/190 10/15 —► 30/60 LO o Lo to LO N;M LO Ul) 0 N Co f 1 a> d 0 100/150 =-10/15 40/100 r O O Un L 0 o LO o 0 M 00 350/275 —�— 5/5 65/50 Cameron 10170 ` 5/5 —_ Ul) LO u., 10/30 N v LO rn LO rai way AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Fossil Creek 14 N LONG RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND Figure 5 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC c 0 Cameron �n o L0 v o JT.- lrn c�L / f i N N N 25/40 f 0/0 15/35 Fairway 15/25 T 0/0 0 0 Ln 5/25 U o toCO rn UM) r- 0 (o 0 0 e— N \ Co U) tU)CD (O Ju') i — 10170 515 —► 10/30 320/240 —m-- 5/5 55/40 f r Ln 0 (n LO N t` N N � �O O M --w— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Fossil Creek SHORT RANGE (2005) BACKGROUND Figure 4 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC TABLE I Trip Generation i?- m�ci-7 MfMx e. M,R North Area 220 Apartments 72 D.U. 6.63 1 477 1 0.08 6 0.43 31 0.42 30 0.20 14 South Area 220 Apartments 78 D.U. 6.63 517 0.08 6 0.43 34 0.42 33 0.20 16 710 Office 7.2 KSF 11-01 79 1.37 10 0.19 1 0.25 2 1.24 9 Subtotal 596 16 35 35 25 Total 1073 22 66 65 39 To Macon Street Tnmpo� �me+mvnr meorwi Link To Mawn - k Cnerdnr T !9 to Lr Te Flit v NO SCALE 4 N CREEK SITE PLAN Figure 2 ' N N N L W m N O U Harmon Redtail PDP T cc E d J Cameron T °ss,� O, rn OD N cn Trilby SCALE: 1"=2000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 v operation using the traffic forecasts shown in Figure 6. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections will operate similarly to that shown with the background traffic. Figure 7 shows the short range geometry at the key intersections. Figure 8 shows the long range (2020) total peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Table 5 shows the long range peak hour operation using the traffic forecasts shown in Figure 8. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably. Figure 9 shows the long range geometry at the key intersections. In the staff comments, reference was made to the proximity of the Cameron/Frontage Road intersection to College Avenue. This is an existing situation. The close proximity does cause operational concerns regarding. blockage of the Frontage Road by eastbound traffic on Cameron Drive approaching College Avenue. This situation exists elsewhere in Fort Collins. It is recommended that signs be placed stating "DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTION." Elimination of the Frontage Road does not appear to be an option. The site plan for the Cameron Office Park shows a parking lot connection between Cameron Drive and Coronado Court. This connection provides an option of not using the Frontage Road by some of the traffic. A comment was made regarding the consistency of traffic forecasts with those in the "South College Avenue Access Control Plan." When Kathleen Reavis was contacted in early 2001 regarding this document, she provided information regarding the access points, but no information with regard to traffic forecasts. Therefore, Mark Jackson was contacted to get traffic forecasts. The peak hour forecasts in the transportation impact study are consistent with those supplied by Mark Jackson. Two additional pedestrian destinations were requested by Kathleen Reavis. These are the Mason Street Corridor (park/ride station) and the Werner Elementary School (east of College Avenue). Appendix E contains a pedestrian level of service worksheet showing these two destinations. The Mason Street Corridor will meet acceptable pedestrian level of service criteria once the sidewalk system is built within Redtail and once the City makes the necessary improvements related to the Mason Street Corridor park/ride station. The pedestrian level of service cannot meet the minimum criteria for all factors for the Werner Elementary School. This is primarily due to street crossings and continuity. There are no sidewalks in the Fossil Creek residential area east of College Avenue. This is a county subdivision and sidewalks were not required, nor are they desired by the residents. There is little that can be done to improve this. Currently, bicycles use the shoulders along College Avenue as bike lanes. Generally, this is considered to be safe for the few bicyclists that use College Avenue. Where there are .striped acceleration or deceleration lanes on College Avenue, the bicyclists share this area with the motor vehicles. Since the bicycle traffic is low, this situation is generally acceptable. When College Avenue is restriped to be a six -lane facility, it is recommended that bicycles not be allowed to use College Avenue. This recommendation is consistent with the "no bike" policy on College Avenue north of Harmony Road. MEMORANDUM Co REG/sr Lo PPpO CD o TO: Jon Prouty, Lagunitas Companies o��-EWJ•Q�;c�`9 • LO Cathy Mathis, VF Ripley V� Q, O 6 City of Fort Collins I� 152 o O FROM: Matt Delich 0 DATE: December 18, 2001 S/SAL X a zu. SUBJECT: Redtail PDP Transportation Impact Study Addendum a LU (File: 0106ME01) 0 J • _ (D The Redtail PDP, located east of the College/Fossil Creek/ w >_ N Cameron intersection, Figure 1, has been revised. Figure 2 shows the 0 � new site plan. As indicated on Figure 2, access to the site has been z changed to include access to Fairway Lane to the north. In addition W to this, the proposed land uses have been changed. This addendum S addresses the staff comments contained in the Staff Project Review Z W dated August 28, 2001. Contact. with Transportation Planning and oTraffic Operations indicated that a memorandum addressing the n comments and changes would be necessary. N r` N The new site plan shows that most of Redtail has been changed to residential land uses. Table 1 shows the new trip generation estimate for Redtail. There will be a reduction in the trip generation compared to the previous Redtail plan. The peak hour trip generation will be reduced by 20-30 percent. In addition to this, the site plan shows that access to a portion of the site will be via the College/Fairway intersection. This will reduce the amount of traffic that will use the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. Figure 3 shows the assignment of the site generated traffic at the key intersections. Figures 4 and 5 show the short range (2005) and long range LU (2020) background peak hour traffic at the key intersections. It is expected that traffic signals would not be warranted at the College/ (L z Fairway intersection in the short range future. However, as further ¢ development occurs to the east and west, signals would likely be Z warranted at this intersection. The College/Fairway intersection is "South as a future signalized intersection on the College Vshown Z Avenue Access Control Plan." The right-in/right-out access to J W College Avenue is also shown on the "South College Avenue Access W o Control Plan." Table 2 shows the operation of the key intersections 0 F with the short range background peak hour traffic. Calculation forms ¢ are provided in Appendix A. The College/Fossil Creek/Cameron ' 0 intersection will operate acceptably. With the existing stop sign a y control, the delays to the Fairway Lane legs of the College/Fairway z a intersection will be commensurate with level of service D/E/F in the H peak hours. Table 3 shows the operation of the key intersections W as with the long range background peak hour traffic. Calculation forms V are provided in Appendix B. With the warranted'signalization, the akey intersections will operate acceptably. QFigure 6 shows the short range (2005) total peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Table 4 shows the short range peak hour