The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutREDTAIL RESIDENTIAL - PDP - 26-01 - REPORTS - TRAFFIC STUDY (4)HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 7L18/02 Jurisd: Fort Colli s long bkgrd total Period: pm Year recent short lam Project 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 1 I No. Lanes I 1 I I 1 1 2 1 I 1 0 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L T R I L TR I Volume I10 5 10 155 5 320 125 1305 40 1160 755 55 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 28.0 7.0 54.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 363 TR 469 Westbound 1251 0.03 1676 0.04 LT 395 1410 R 633 1583 Northbound L 428 1770 T 1911 3539 R 855 1583 Southbound L 251 1770 T 1911 3539 R 855 1583 Intersection Delay 0.29 25.5 C 0.28 26.2 C 25.9 C 0.17 0.28 0.57 0.40 0.07 0.62 0:80 0.54 0.05 0.54 27.4 C 24.5 C 25.0 C 8.0 A 16.8 B 16.4 B 11.0 B 0.73 0.62 33.0 C 0.45 0.54 10.6 B 14.3 B 0.07 0.54 11.2 B 16.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: (970) 669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 4) rn m 0 100/150 --10/15 40/100 100/200 f 10/15 —■► O 0 to 30/60 � eo LO10 o L rn y a `n 0 JI 10/5 or to (0 LO MLO 0 c` e) 00 (D ) f 1 350/275 f- 5/5 65/50 Cameron 25/80 ` 5/5 — U) LO LO 20/35 t LO N 0 Lo O CO LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Fairway -• AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Fossil Creek N Figure 8 a HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/18/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: ollege/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 980 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1126 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 Configuration T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (�) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 0 1 R 0.85 11 2 No lay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 I 1 R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b 9.2 A 867 0.01 0.04 9.2 A Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. TABLE S. Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation M 94 EMO,- S.-mMM-A mlcihl 'Mli College/Fossil Creek/Cameron OVERALL B B (signal) College/Fairway OVERALL B B (signal) College/Fossil Boulevard EB RT A A -(RT-in/RT-out) Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet P. l 8 — i TA1JS(t F1 CU-"ry )I . Gi /J0 7- C� (G r City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan r' APPENDIX E 4 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/1�8/02 Analysis Time Period: am p Intersection: Col ege/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short ong bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1.1/U 1D Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1442 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume li Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 . Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I R v (vph) 15 C(m) (vph) 809 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.06 Control Delay 9.5 LOS A Approach Delay 9.5 Approach LOS A HCS2000:.Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. •. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/18/02 Analysis Time Period: m Intersection: ollege/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short ong bkgrd otal Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 783 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 824 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach. NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 10 C (m) (vph) 922 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.03 Control Delay 8.9 LOS A Approach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b i Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fairway Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/1,�8/�02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am(*Year recent short En bkgrd tota Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fairway N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 1200 15 60 1100 15 150 160 1720 75 I100 1895 130 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A SB Left A P Thru A Thru P Right A Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right WB Right Green 30.0 6.0 53.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 323 T 559 R 649 Westbound L 417 TR 483 Northbound L 233 TR 2678 Southbound L 233 TR 2669 1042 0.69 0.31 36.3 D 1863 0.03 0.30 24.7 C 31.7 C 1583 0.10 0.41 18.2 B 1345 0.27 0.31 26.3 C 1609 0.38 0.30 28.2 C 27.5 1770 0.27 0.60 5053 0.71 0.53 1770 0.45 0.60 5036 0.80 0.53 14.5 B 14.3 B 14.3 Le B 14.3 B 16.4 B 16.3 B Intersection Delay = 17.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fairway Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: am pm 718/02 Jurisd: Year Fort Collins recent short ong bkgr total Project D- 0106 E/W St: Fairway N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 1100 10 30 140 10 100 155 1905 100 1100 1100 120 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 8.0 55.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 324 1200 0.34 0.27 30.0 C T 484 1863 0.02 0.26 27.6 C 27.5 C R 617 1583 0.05 0.39 19.0 B Westbound L 363 1346 0.12 0.27 27.7 C TR 418 1609 0.29 0.26 30.0 C 29.4 C Northbound L 356 1770 0.16 0.64 7.6 A TR 2776 5047 0.76 0.55 13.9 B 13.7 B Southbound L 270 1770 0.39 0.64 13.5 B TR 2756 5010 0.47 0.55 9.8 A 10.1 B Intersection Delay = 13.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: 7/18 2 am Jurisd: Year Fort Collins recent short on bkgr tota Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I 1 1 1 0 I 1 0 1 1 I I 1 3 0 I I 1 1 3 0 I LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L TR I L TR I Volume 180 5 35 150 5 275 115 1505 65 1355 1670 35 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A A Green 24.0 6.0 10.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red' 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 313 1250 0.28 0.25 30.8 C TR 389 1621 0.12 0.24 29.8 C 30.5 C Westbound LT 331 1378 0.19 0.24 30.5 C 21.1 C R 712 1583 0.43 0.45 19.2 B Northbound L 310 1770 0.05 0.58 9.0 A TR 2527 5054 0.65 0.50 15.6 B 15.5 B Southbound L 410 1770 0.91 0.67 52.8 D TR 3042 5070 0.59 0.60 7.4 A 15.3 B Intersection Delay = 16.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com secs OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/18/02 Period ai pm Jurisd: Year : Fort Collins recent short ong bkgr tota Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound 1 .L T R No. Lanes I 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR Volume 125 5 20 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 I Westbound I L T R 1 1 0 1 1 I LT R 165 5 350 I 12.0 12.0 I 0 I Northbound I L T R I I 1 3 0 I L TR 125 1600 55 112.0 12.0 I 0 I Southbound I I L T R I I I 1 1 3 0 I I L TR I 1185 935 60 1 112.0 12.0 I I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 30.0 8.0 51.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 380 1226 0.07 0.31 24.4 C TR 493 1643 0.06 0.30 25.0 C 24.7 C Westbound LT 414 1380 0.19 0.30 26.2 C 23.3 C R 681 1583 0.57 0.43 22.7 C Northbound L 387 1770 0.07 0.60 8.7 A TR 2581 5060 0.67 0.51 15.2 B 15.1 B Southbound L 269 1770 0.72 0.60 30.0 C TR 2570 5039 0.41 0.51 11.9 B 14.7 B Intersection Delay = 16.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich; P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/18/02 Analysis Time Period: am �pm� Intersection: Col ege/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: hort long bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 1705 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1894 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 Configuration T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I 1 R v tvpn/ i C(m) (vph) 735 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 Control Delay 9.9 LOS A Approach Delay 9.9 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/1 2 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: College/Fairway Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: shor long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: Fairway North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 1510 15 30 1645 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92, 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 1641 16 33 1827 33 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 35 0 40 35 0 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 47 41 0 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration LT R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I L T R v (vph) 21 33 41 47 41 0 29 C(m) (vph) 321 474 92 828 57 64 276 v/c 0.07 0.07 0.45 0.06 0.72 0.00 0.11 95% queue length 0.21 0.22 1.87 0.18 3.05 0.00 0.35 Control Delay 17.0 13.2 72.4 9.6 161.3 61.3 19.6 LOS C B F A F F C Approach Delay 38.9 102.6 Approach LOS E F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. tHCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/18/02 Analysis Time Period: m)pm Intersection: ollege/Fairway Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S.,Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgrd total' Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: Fairway North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 1610 30 30 955 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 1894 35 34 1097 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 0 25 30 0 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 - 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 0 29 35 0 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0 No 1 1 LT R 1 1 L T No 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R L T R v (vph) 11 34 17 29 35 0 5 . C(m) (vph) 623 353 96 807 145 81 480 v/c 0.02 0.10 0.18 0.04 0.24 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.05 0.32 0.61 0.11 0.90 0.00 0.03 Control Delay 10.9 16.3 50.4 9.6 37.6 49.4 12.6 LOS B C F A E E B Approach Delay 24.7 34.4 Approach LOS C D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: 7/18 02 am Jurisd: Year Fort Coll' s recent hort long bkgr otal Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T I R 1 I No. Lanes I I 1 1 0 I 1 0 1 1 I I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L T R I L T R I Volume 180 5 35 140 5 240 115 1230 55 1310 1365 35 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A A Green 25.0 6.0 10.0 48.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 336 1294 0.28 0.26 30.0 C TR 405 1619 0.12 0.25 29.1 C 29.7 C Westbound LT 353 1411 0.15 0.25 29.4 C 19.9 B R 728 1583 0.39 0.46 18.1 B Northbound L 333 1770 0.05 0.56 10.4 B T 1699 3539 0.79 0.48 21.1 C 20.7 C R 760 1583 0.08 0.48 14.3 B Southbound L 411 1770 0.84 0.65 41.7 D T 2053 3539 0.74 0.58 11.0 B 16.6 B R 918 1583 0.04 0.58 9.1 A Intersection Delay = 18.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: 7/18/02 Opm Jurisd: Year Fort Col s recent short long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I L T I R I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 I 1 1 2 1 1 2 I 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L T R I L T R I Volume 125 5 20 155 5 320 125 1310 40 1160 765 60 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 28.0 7.0 54.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 M 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 363 1251 0.08 0.29 25.9 C TR 459 1639 0.07 0.28 26.5 C 26.2 C Westbound LT 391 1395 0.17 0.28 27.5 C 25.0 C R 633 1583 0.57 0.40 24.5 C Northbound L 424 1770 0.07 0.62 8.0 A T 1911 3539 0.81 0.54 16.9 B 16.6 B R 855 1583 0.05 0.54 11.0 B Southbound L 251 1770 0.73 0.62 33.0 C T 1911 3539 0.46 0.54 10.7 B 14.3 B R 855 1583 0.08 0.54 11.2 B Intersection Delay = 17.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fairway Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/11 /02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am Year recent short(En bkgr total Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fairway N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I No. Lanes I I I 1 1 3 0 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 1 17 3 0 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L TR Volume 1190 15 60 I100 15 150 150 1710 75 I100 1865 125 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 30.0 6.0 53.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 323 T 559 R 649 Westbound L 417 TR 483 Northbound L 233 TR 2678 1042 0.65 0.31 34.5 C 1863 0.03 0.30 24.7 C 1583 0.10 0.41 18.2 B 1345 0.27 0.31 26.3 C 1609 0.38 0.30 28.2 C 30.3 C 27.5 C 1770 0.23 0.60 13.7 B 5053 0.70 0.53 14.2 B 14.2 B Southbound L 233 1770 0.45 0.60 14.2 B TR 2670 5037 0.78 0.53 16.0 B 15.9 B Intersection Delay = 16.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland,.CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fairway Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: 7 18/02 am m Jurisd:.Fort Year Collins recent short lon kgrd total Project ID: 0106 E/W St: Fairway N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T, R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 185 10 30 140 10 100 150 1890 100 1100 1090 120 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 8.0 55.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 324 1200 0.29 0.27 29.4 C T 484 1863 0.02 0.26 27.6 C 26.8 C R 617 1583 0.05 0.39 19.0 B Westbound L 363 1346 0.12 0.27 27.7 C TR 418 1609 0.29 0.26 30.0 C 29.4 C Northbound L 358 1770 0.15 0.64 7.5 A TR 2776 5047 0.75 0.55 13.7 B 13.6 B Southbound L 270 1770 0.39 0.64 13.4 B TR 2756 5010 0.46 0.55 9.8 A 10.1 B Intersection Delay = 13.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/18 02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year recent short ong kgrd total Project ID: 106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I' Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Sbuthbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I 1 1 0 I 1 0 1 1 I I 1 3 0 I I I 1 3 0 1 LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L TR I L TR I Volume 170 5 30 150 5 275 15 1495 65 1355 1665 20 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A A Green 24.0 6.0 10.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 313 1250 0.25 0.25 30.4 C TR 390 1626 0.10 0.24 29.7 C 30.2 C Westbound LT 332 1385 0.19 0.24 30.5 C 21.1 C R 712 1583 0.43 0.45 19.2 B Northbound L 314 1770 0.02 0.58 8.9 A TR 2527 5054 0.65' 0.50 15.5 B 15.5 B Southbound L 410 1770 0.91 0.67 52.8 D TR 3046 5076 0.58 0.60 7.4 A 15.3 B Intersection Delay = 16.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period 718/02 a pm Jurisd: Year : Fort Collins recent short on kgrd total Project D• 0106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 1 0 I I 0 1 1 I 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 I LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L TR I L TR I Volume I10 5 10 165 5 350 125 1595 55 1185 925 55 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 " 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 30.0 8.0 51.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay.LOS Eastbound L 380 1226 0.03 0.31 24.1 C TR 505 1682 0.03 0.30 24.8 C 24.5 C Westbound LT 418 1394 0.19 0.30 26.2 C 23.3 C R 681 1583 0.57 0.43 22.7 C Northbound L 391 1770 0.07 0.60 8.7 A TR 2581 5060 0.67 0.51 15.1 B 15.1 B Southbound L 269 1770 0.72 0.60 30.0 C TR 2571 5042 0.40 0.51 11.8 B 14.7 B Intersection Delay = 16.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX B Table 4-3 Fort C;oiitns motor vehicle LOU stanciarcis (intersections Commercial, Other corridors within lntersecUon type Mixed use Low density mixed; All other. districts I use residential areas Stop sign control (arteriat/local�—any Stop sign control. (collectorflocal-- mitigating measures required considered normal in an urban environment Page 4-22 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standard January 2,2001 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/18/02 Analysis Time Period: an tpm Intersection: Co ege/Fairway Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: Fairway North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 1500 15 30 1615 25 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 1630 16 33 1794 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 35 0 40 25 0 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 47 29 0 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration LT R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I L T R v (vph) 10 33 41 47 29 0 29 C(m) (vph) 332 478 101 831 60 68 283 v/c 0.03 0.07 0.41 0.06 0.48 0.00 0.10 95% queue length 0.09 0.22 1.68 0.18 1.89 0.00 0.34 Control Delay 16.2 13.1 63.1 9.6 111.7 57.9 19.2 LOS C B F A F F C Approach Delay 34.5 65.5 Approach LOS D F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7 18/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: ollege/Fairway Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: short long bkgrd total Project ID: 0106 East/West Street: Fairway North/South Street: College Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 1595 30 30 945 15 Peak -Hour Factor,'PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1876 35 34 1086 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 15 0 25 15 0 5 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 17 0 29 17 0 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration LT R L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT R I L T R v (vph) 5 34 17 29 17 0 5 C(m) (vph) 629 360 102 807 149 85 484 v/c 0.01 0.09 0.17 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.31 0.57 0.11 0.38 0.00 0.03 Control Delay 10.8 16.0 47.2 9.6 32.2 47.4 12.5 LOS B C E A D E B Approach Delay 23.5 27.8 Approach LOS C D HCS2000 Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Signalized Inte=sections Release 4.1b Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: 7/18/02 am m Jurisd: Year Fort Coll' s recent hor.lon bkgr total Project ID�"O106 E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound L T. R I I Westbound I L T R I 1 Northbound I L T R 1 I Southbound I I L T R I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L T R I L T R I Volume 170 5 30 140 5 240 15 1220 55 1310 1360 20 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right A A Green 25.0 6.0 10.0 48.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 336 1294 0.24 0.26 29.6 C TR 406 1624 0.10 0.25 29.0 C 29.4 C Westbound LT 354 1417 0.15 0.25 29.4 C 19.9 B R 728 1583 0.39 0.46 18.1 B Northbound L 334 1770 0.01 0.56 10.3 B T 1699 3539 0.78 0.48 20.8 C 20.5 C R 760 1583 0.08 0.48 14.3 B Southbound L 411 1770 0.84 0.65 41.7 D T 2053 3539 0.74 0.58 11.0 B 16.6 B R 918 1583 0.02 0.58 9.0 A Intersection Delay = 18.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX A Cameron Fairway � - Denotes Lane Fossil Creek N LONG RANGE (2020) GEOMETRY Figure 9 Jll� Cameron 4) rn m 0 U 111 Fairway - 0 - Denotes Lane Fossil Creek SHORT RANGE (2005) GEOMETRY . Figure 7 TABLE 4 Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Operation R N� M ......... . . . . . IN College/Fossil Creek/Cameron (signal) OVERALL B B College/Fairway (stop sign) WB LT/T F F WB RT A A WB APPROACH C E EB LT E F EBT E F EB RT B C EB APPROACH D F NB LT B C SB LT C B College/Fossil Boulevard (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT A A rn A& m LO U N Ir O O Q L o 25/40 0) M �— 0/0 + � � 15/35 r Fairway 30/35 --)� I} 0/0 o O_ U') 5/25 o to o M. O LO CO C) O Co LO O f- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 10/5 5 Vehicles L co O LO CO o LO � 320/240 c° h + � �-- 5/10 55/40 � Cameron / 25/80 ` / Fossil Creek 5/5 20/35 ,n O ,n , � N o N '4f M SHORT RANGE (2005) TOTAL Figure 6 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC TABLE 2 Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour Operation p-, �p '4 College/Fossil Creek/Cameron (signal) OVERALL B B College/Fairway (stop sign) WB LT/T E F WB RT A A WB APPROACH C D EB LT D F EBT E F EB RT B C EB APPROACH D F NB LT B C SB LT C B TABLE 3 Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation yp TWIN 211 WIT �TA, -=��- '. - College/Fossil Creek/Cameron OVERALL B B (signal) College/Fairway OVERALL B B (signal) I LO 0 LO N o CV O N 0) O f 1 85/190 10/15 —� 30/60 0 (0 LO 0 LO N M LO LO LO N O LO ) f 1 rn 0 100/150 10/15 40/100 t r 0 0 0 o � o Lo 0 o - rn co 350/275 5/5 65/50 Cameron 10170 ` 5/5 —; 0 0 10/30 N v LO �. LLo M 0 LONG RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Fairway AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Fossil Creek N Figure 5 L0 Ln C LO v o rJ- ) c) f i m416. rn N 25/40 0/0 15/35 15/25 Fairway 010 0 C Ln 5/25 � o to 01 LO 0 cmcf) C C to 320/240 � `IO r- 5/5 55/40 Cameron 10R0 5/5 — 10/30 Ir LO0LO N N 0 C co SHORT RANGE (2005) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC �— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Fossil Creek Figure 4 l Site � 1 Cameron —ow— AM/PM Fairway Fossil Creek N SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 TABLE I Trip Generation , - IHE'"gt4z A�RR VA gggr North Area 230 Townhome 68 D.U. 5.86 1 398 1 0.07 5 0.37 25 0.36 25 0.18 12 South Area 230 Townhome 64 D.U. 5.86 375 0.07 4 0.37 24 0.36 23 0.18 12 Total M 9 49 48 24 L . �FAI ii O I iml IrFr*lh---C - SITE PLAN C F H N NO SCALE 20�c Tj B F c A v MgWn I FOSSIL BM"ARD Rig -Out I j 1 13 2 FOSS"EEK OFFICE PARK COftONADOCOURT 0 8 0 CAMERON PK OFFICE AK 2 ...... Figure 2 N N V N L N N O U Harmon Redtail PIDIP w E 4) J Cameron os, / co N Trilby SCALE: 1 "=2000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 A comment was made regarding the consistency of traffic forecasts with those in the "South College Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update Report." When Kathleen Reavis was contacted in early 2001 regarding this document, she provided information regarding the access points, but no information with regard to traffic forecasts. Therefore, Mark Jackson was contacted to get traffic forecasts. The peak hour forecasts in the transportation impact study are consistent with those supplied by Mark Jackson. Two additional pedestrian destinations were requested by City staff. These are the Mason Street Corridor (park/ride station) and the Werner Elementary School (east of College Avenue). Appendix E contains a pedestrian level of service worksheet showing these two destinations. The Mason Street Corridor will meet acceptable pedestrian level of service criteria once the sidewalk system is built within Redtail and once the City makes the necessary improvements related to the Mason Street Corridor park/ride station. The pedestrian level of service cannot meet the minimum criteria for all factors for the Werner Elementary School. This is primarily due to street crossings and continuity. There are no sidewalks in the Fossil Creek residential area east of College Avenue. This is a county subdivision and sidewalks were not required, nor are they desired by the residents. There is little that can be done to improve this. When the raised median is built by the City/CDOT in South College Avenue, the street crossing factor will be acceptable. Currently, bicycles use the shoulders along College Avenue as bike lanes. Generally, this is considered to be safe for the few bicyclists that use College Avenue. Where there are striped acceleration or deceleration lanes on College Avenue, the bicyclists share this area with the motor vehicles. Since the bicycle traffic is low, this situation is generally acceptable. When College Avenue is restriped to be a six -lane facility, it is recommended that bicycles not'be allowed to use College Avenue. This recommendation is consistent with the "no bike" policy on College Avenue north of Harmony Road. Traffic volumes on Fossil Boulevard (RT-in/RT-out) will be less than 1000 vehicles per day. This indicates that Fossil Boulevard should be classified as a residential, local street. Traffic volumes on Cameron Drive, just west of South College Avenue, will be 1500-2000 vehicles per day. These volumes are commensurate with that of a connector, local street. Traffic volumes will progressively decrease on Cameron Drive, to the west, toward the south portion of Redtail. In the new segment of Cameron Drive (to be.constructed with this development), traffic volumes will be less than 1000 vehicles per day. This indicates that the new segment of Cameron Drive should be classified as a residential, local street. 0 intersection will be commensurate with level of service D/E/F in the peak hours. This intersection is in a commercial corridor. The Fort Collins Motor vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections), also provided in Appendix A, indicates that the level of service at a stop sign controlled intersection is N/A (not applicable). It is assumed that, when signal warrants are met, this intersection will be signalized. Until that. .occurs, the calculated/actual operation is deemed to be acceptable. Table 3 shows the operation of the key intersections with the long range background peak hour traffic. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. With the warranted signalization, the key intersections will operate acceptably. Figure 6 shows the short range (2005) total peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Table 4 shows the short range peak hour operation using the traffic forecasts shown in Figure 6. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections will operate similarly to that shown with the background traffic. Figure 7 shows the short range geometry at the key intersections. Figure 8 shows the long range (2020) total peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Table 5 shows the long range peak hour operation using the traffic forecasts shown in Figure 8. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix D_ The key intersections will operate acceptably. Figure 9 shows the long range geometry at the key intersections. In .the staff comments, reference was made to the proximity of the Cameron/Frontage Road intersection to College Avenue. This is an existing situation. The close proximity does cause operational concerns regarding blockage of the Frontage Road by eastbound traffic on Cameron Drive approaching College Avenue. This situation exists elsewhere in Fort Collins. It is recommended that signs be placed stating "DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTION. Elimination of the Frontage Road does not appear to be an option, since it serves the parking lot for Cameron Office Park, Parcel 1 on the south leg of the frontage road, and the Fossil Creek Office Park (Coronado Court) on the north leg of the frontage road. The site plan for the Cameron Office Park shows a parking lot connection between Cameron Drive and Coronado Court. This connection provides an option of not using the Frontage Road by some of the traffic. If the existing median on Cameron Drive is extended to the east, it will cover the frontage road. This will force U-turns at the west end of the existing median. These U- turns will be difficult, if not impossible, for most vehicle types. While the median treatment may be perceived as an ideal solution, it does not deal with the reality of accessing certain properties in an established business park. Staff indicated the potential need for a center median in South College Avenue from Cameron Drive to Fairway Lane. This median is mentioned in the "South College Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update Report" as an element of the Long Range Access Plan. It is not mentioned as part of the Short -Term Access Plan. Therefore, the median treatment is part of the 20-year plan. It is appropriate that the medianization of South College Avenue proceed in an orderly fashion from north to south, as it has in the past. Construction of isolated medians is not recommended. It is more appropriate that this median be built when South College Avenue is widened to the major arterial (6 through lanes) cross section. The suggested treatment at the Fossil Boulevard (RT-in/RT-out) intersection with South College Avenue is that of a channelization island that will discourage left -in and left -out movements. This design has been prepared by J.R. Engineering. co co L0 0 • 0 0 a O J U 0 z a J w O J w' 0 z w a z w lJR V N r N N Uj a 7 W MEMORANDUM P S) V J. T cr)o TO: Jon Prouty, Lagunitas Companies CD Cathy Mathis, VF Ripley p• rn City of Fort Collins CD o FROM: Matt Delich r X DATE: July 23, 2002 a u_ SUBJECT: Redtail PDP Transportation Impact Study Addendum (File: 0106ME02) cn 0 The Redtail PDP, located east of the College/Fossil Creek/ N Cameron intersection, Figure 1, has been revised. Figure 2 shows the CD new site plan. As indicated on Figure 2, access to the site has been ochanged to include access to Fairway Lane to the north. Also, r Cameron Drive will not connect with Fossil Boulevard to the north. rn With this street configuration, the northern portion of the site will w have access to Fairway Lane and Fossil Boulevard only. In addition o to this, the proposed land uses have been changed. This addendum d addresses the staff comments contained in the Staff Project Review dated April 23, 2002. Contact with Transportation Planning and Traffic Operations indicated that a memorandum addressing the comments and changes would be necessary. The new site plan shows that all of Redtail has been changed to all residential land uses. Table 1 shows the new trip generation estimate for Redtail. There will be a reduction in the trip generation compared to the previous Redtail plan. The peak hour trip generation will be reduced by 25-35 percent. In addition to this, the site plan shows that access to the northern portion of the site will be via the College/Fairway and College/Fossil Boulevard (RT- in/RT-out) intersections, and access to the southern portion of the site will be via the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. The College/Fossil Boulevard (RT-in/RT-out) intersection is shown on the "South College Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update Report," Z February 2002, at a conceptual location just north of where it is FE w shown on the site plan. Figure 3 shows the assignment of the site w generated traffic at the key intersections. z Z Figures 4 and 5 show the short range (2005) and long range LU (2020) background peak hour traffic at the key intersections. It is O expected that traffic signals would not be warranted at the College/ a Fairway intersection in the short range future. However, as further cc development occurs to the east and west, signals would likely be O warranted at this intersection. The College/Fairway intersection is a Z z shown as a future signalized intersection on the "South College a Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update Report." The right- ¢ f- in/right-out access (Fossil Boulevard) to College Avenue is also shown on the "South College Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update Report." Table 2 shows the operation of the key intersections with U. the short range background peak hour traffic. Calculation forms are ¢ provided in Appendix A. The College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection will operate acceptably. With the existing stop sign control, the delays to the Fairway Lane legs of the College/Fairway