HomeMy WebLinkAboutREDTAIL RESIDENTIAL - PDP - 26-01 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSnt;:�ituuu: 6ignaiizea intersecLions heiease e.lo
Analyst:
Michael
Inter.:
College/Fairway
Agency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
Date:
7/18/02
Jurisd:
Fort Collins
Period:
am(To
Year
recent short(En bkgr total
Project
ID: 0106
E/W St:
Fairway
NIS St:
College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound i
I L T R
I L T R
I L T R
I L T R I
No. Lanes
I
I
I
I I
I 1 1 1
1 1 1 0
I 1 3 0
1 1 3 0 I
LGConfig
I L T R
I L TR
I L TR
I L TR I
Volume
1190 15 60
I100 15 '150
150 1710 75
I100 1865 125 1
Lane Width
112.0 12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 I
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0 I
Duration 0.25
Area Type: All
other
areas
Signal
Operations
Phase Combination
1
2 3 4
1
5
6 7 8
EB Left
A
I NB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
WB Left
A
I SB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
NB Right
I EB
Right
A
SB Right
I WB
Right
Green
30.0
6.0
53.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
4.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection
Performance
Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane
Group
Approach
Lane Group
Flow Rate
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C
Delay
LOS
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 323
1042
0.65
0.31
34.5
C
T 559
1863
0.03
0.30
24.7
C
30.3 C
R 649
1583
0.10
0.41
18.2
B
Westbound
L 417
1345
0.27
0.31
26.3
C
TR 483
1609
0.38
0.30
28.2
C
27.5 C
Northbound
L 233
1770
0.23
0.60
13.7
B
TR 2678
5053
0.70
0.53
14.2
B
14.2 B
Southbound
L 233 1770 0.45
TR 2670 5037 0.78
Intersection Delay = 16.8
0.60 14.2 B
0.53 16.0 B 15.9 B
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS =.B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland,.CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: tndelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
1001200 —�
10/15 -
30/60
Ji
10/5
O to
c.0 ►n
0
0 c0 LO ` 00
_cO alp r-
i 1
0)
On
m
0
100/150
--o-10/15
40/100
O o LO
Q N
LO O
to O
LO
rn
350/275
�— 5/5
65/50
Cameron
25/80
`
1
5/5 —
LO
►n
LO
20/35
L
LO
N
Lo
O
co
Fairway
+f AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Fossil Creek
A&
N
LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL Figure 8
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
-Tency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
to Performed: 12/17/01
analysis Time Period: ® pm
Intersection: College/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short long bkgr total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume 980 5
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1031 5
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 2 1
Configuration T R
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
. r..
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent. Grade (%)
Median Storage
Flared.Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Delay,
Approach NB
Movement 1
Lane Config
93
Queue Length, and Level
SB Westbound
4 I 7 8 9
10
0.95
10
2
0
No
1
R
of Service
Eastbound
1 10 11 12
1 R
v (vph)
10
C (m) (vph)
884
v/c
0.01
95% queue length
0.03
Control Delay
9.1
LOS
p
Approach Delay
9.1
Approach LOS
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst:
matt
ncy/Co.:
mjdpe
e Performed:
117/01
Analysis Time Period:
a pm
Intersection:
college/fairway
Jurisdiction:
fort collins
Units: U. S. Customar
Analysis Year: 2005 2020 egrtotal
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: fairway lane
North/South Street: college
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
5
1595
30
30
945
15
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
5
1678
31
31
994
15
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
--
--
0
--
--
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1
2 1
1
2 1
Configuration
L
T R
L
T R
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Volume
15
0
25
15 0
5
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.95 0.95
0.95
0.95 0.95
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
15
0
26
15 0
5
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0 0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Median Storage
1
Flared Approach:
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
0 1
1
1 1
1
Configuration
LT
R
L T
R
Delay,.
Queue
Length,
and Level
of Service
Approach
NB
SB
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement
1
4
1 7
8
9 1 10
11 12
Lane Config
L
L
I LT
R I L
T R
v (vph)
5
31
15
26
15
0
5
C(m) (vph)
695
377
78
313
128
80
524
v/c
0.01
0.08
0.19
0.08
0.12
0.00
0.01
95% queue length
0.02
0.27
0.66
0.27
0.39
0.00
0.03
Control Delay
10.2
15.4.
61.8
17.5
36.8
50.0
11.9
LOS
B
C
F
C
E
E
B
Approach Delay
33.7
30.6
Approach LOS
D
D
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
To Mawr Street Link To Masan
Transpoftbon
YISOIGPMY
L1CDI/�1
NO SCALE
CREEK
SITE PLAN Figure 2
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst:
Michael
Agency/Co.:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
s Performed:
2/22/01
iysis Time Period:
am pm
Intersection:
ollege/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction:
Fa= Collins
Analysis Year:
short long total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street:
RT-in/RT-out
North/South Street:
College
Intersection Orientation: NS
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
volume 945 BO
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 994 84
Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 2 1
Configuration T R
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 '8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
ime 5
Pcdk Hour Factor, PHF 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 i 10 11 12
Lane Config I I R
v tvpn)
5
C(m) (vph)
891
v/c .
0.01
95% queue length
0.02
Control Delay
9.1
LOS
A
Approach Delay
9.1
Approach LOS
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capacity
Eastbound
L 119 1297 0.33
TR 137 1627 0.14
Westbound
LT 114 1350 0.30
R 346 1583 0.15
Northbound
L 456 1770 0.00
T 2617 3539 0.48
R 1171 1583 0.04
Southbound
L 493 1770 0.17
T 2617 3539 0.54
R 1171 1583 0.01
Intersection Delay = 4.0
_Intersection Performance Summary_
Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Flow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Approach
Delay LOS
0.09 62.0 E
0.08 60.7 E 61.6 E
0.08
62.5
E 52.0
D
0.22
45.1
D
0.85
1.8
A
0.74
1.1
A 1.3
A
0.74
5.1
A
0.85
2.1
A
0.74
1.3
A 1.4
A
0.74
4.9
A
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = A
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst:
Michael
Agency/Co.:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed:
2/16/01
Analysis Time Period:
am
Intersection:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type:
All other areas
Jurisdiction:
Fort Collins
Analysis Year: <EEPshort long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
Cary
"Wivrilvil
Creek
N
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7
12
N.t Nile, I I', FI IRNITIRF
, N , I::'.
FOSSIL CREEK OFFICE PARK � I
ZONED C
� I I
T----- 1---------4
� I
CAMERON PAfC OFFICE ARK
/ 20N \
/
Fosses CF&M
\ PARAW Y
1 ma�a
REDTAIL PDP
-- L— —_L--- \ FORTCOLLINS COLORADO
- - �— -- `\
0 M O i
/b PC4iLL K
fllNs® YE
PIN Swelter
OWNER
I.wlwlwru,�Nc
n r.rr
NiNlwtm
Nibs AM1a,)er
n�me"in. n
:r w.
NM DES®
NN�SN leers
ENGINEER
Imwrs N..
�I
�fl
NMeYtaf
NINa,�[u
SURVEYOR
PMPBb�®e
n+NNnac�r.
L
VF RIPLEY
.roa.m.`.
LANDSCAPE PUN
ve
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 11
2. Residential Building Standards [3.5.2]
a. Orientation to a Connecting Walkway [3.5.2(C)(1)] -
Every front fagade with a primary entrance to a dwelling
unit faces either an adjacent street sidewalk or a
connecting walkway within 200 feet of a street sidewalk
except for Building G and Building 2.
The applicant is requesting a modification to Section
3.5.2(C)(1) of the LUC to allow the walkway connection
between the primary entrances (of Buildings G and 2)
and the street sidewalk to cross driveways.
While it would be physically possible to connect these
two buildings with a connecting walkway along the west
side of the buildings, this connecting walkway would
intrude into a natural features buffer, and would require a
substantial cut across the slope between the buildings
and the adjacent pond which would have to be mitigated
with a retaining wall.
Staff finds that granting the modification request would
not be detrimental to the public good because sensitivity
to the natural feature buffer is achieved by granting the
modification. Furthermore, staff finds exceptional
physical conditions exist which result in unusual and
exceptional practical difficulties in applying the
connecting walkway standard in this instance because
the grade is so steep between the building site and the
existing pond.
Staff therefore recommends that the modification request
be granted.
b. Residential Building Setbacks [3.5.2(D)] — There is a
required minimum 15 foot front yard setback along the
adjacent public streets. The proposed buildings comply
with this standard.
SnNIRI
II
11
11
11
11
11
11
I
'BLOCK 2-
G
AASU z s
mil I URAW
1
PI W1 A Ise
64---
eu
Ill (T: Irr,
I-0
------- - -----
---
....................
Ili
BLOCK 4
J CAMERON PARK OFFICEPARK
...............
mor
7A r I
FOSSIL CREEkOFFICE PARK
I.
V116
III
7
2
LIrv,
- - - - - - - - - - - -- -
REDTAIL PDP
FORTCOLUNS COLORADO
r=
0
9('JA11 V -W
APPENDIX A
signalized in the "South College Avenue Access Control Plan Update Report,"
February 2002. However, it is not likely that the signal warrants will be
met in the short range (±5 years) future. With the eventual signalization,
the College/Fairway intersection will operate acceptably.
It is concluded that the key intersections will operate similarly to
that reported in the original Redtail TIS with either land•use alternative
currently under consideration.
co
c*)
LO
0
w
O
0
a
Cr
O
J
O
0
0
Z.
a
J
W
'o
J
v
cr)
O
cD
0
rn
a
u_
• CD
W
E N
cc 0)
0 CD
z
> o
a �
z w
'J Z
V =
a n
N
N
W
a
V
J
W
a
7
W
F
cs
z
W
W
z
U
z
W
z
O
a
Q
O
IL
h
z
a
F-
Ca
U
U.
a
a
H
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jon Prouty, Lagunitas Companies
Cathy Mathis, VF Ripley
City of Fort Collins
FROM: Matt Delich
DATE: October 1, 2003
5 11
;Ch 'A Q
vv-
v' fir
SUBJECT: Redtail PDP Transportation Impact Study Addendum -
Alternative land uses (File: 0106ME04)
The Redtail PDP, located east of the College/Fossil Creek/
Cameron intersection was evaluated with alternative land uses and
compared to the proposal in the original transportation impact study
(TIS). This memorandum provides a comparison of the trip generation
and an opinion regarding the operation of the key intersections.
Appendix A contains a site plan showing the location of Phase I and
Phase II.
Phase I has two alternative land uses. The residential land
use scheme has 88 townhome dwelling units and 4 duplex dwelling
units. This land use will generate 554 daily trip ends, 42 morning
peak hour trip ends, and 52 afternoon peak hour trip ends. The
alternative land use is 109,234 square feet of office. This land use
will generate 1203 daily trip ends, 171 morning peak hour trip ends,
and 162 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Phase II will consist of 45
townhome dwelling units and 4 duplex dwelling units. Phase II will
generate 302 daily trip ends, 23 morning peak hour trip ends, and 28
afternoon peak hour trip ends.
In the original TIS, the trip generation for the Phase I
portion was 517 daily trip ends, 40 morning peak hour trip ends, and
49 afternoon peak hour trip ends and the trip generation for the
Phase II portion was 617 daily trip ends, 88 morning peak hour trip
ends, and 89 afternoon peak hour trip ends.
The current proposal, with the office land use alternative,
will be slightly higher than that analyzed in the original TIS.
However, it is expected that the key intersections will operate
similarly to that reported in the original TIS. The office land use
would likely use the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron signalized
intersection. This intersection has excess capacity.and will be able
to accommodate the additional trips and operate acceptably. With the
residential land use alternative, the trip generation will be much
lower and, therefore, acceptable operation at the College/Fossil
Creek/Cameron intersection will occur.
As reported in the various subsequent memoranda, the College/
Fairway intersection will experience levels of service E/F delay on
the minor street legs with the existing stop sign control. In Fort
Collins, this level of service is expected and is considered to be
normal in an urban environment. This intersection is shown to be
Ni-altimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual
LOS Standards for Development Review • Pedestrian
Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
P. 18
7"9AusrT PACU-Iry
Dor,s Mor C,usr
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
APPENDIX E
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 7/1�8/'02
,
Analysis Time Period: am EV
Intersection: ColT ege/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short ong bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
1370 15
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
1442 15
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
2 0
Configuration
T TR
Upstream Signal? No
No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
volume 15
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade 0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config I I R
V (vph)
- 15
C(m) (vph)
809
v/c
0.02
95% queue length
0.06
Control Delay
9.5
LOS
A
Approach Delay
9.5
Approach LOS
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.10
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 7/18/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: a�m"-ipm Year recent short ong bkgr tots
^roject D• 0106
W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I 1 I
No. Lanes I 1 1 0 I 0 1 1 I 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1
LGConfig I L TR 1 LT R I L TR I L TR I
Volume 125 5 20 165 5 350 125 1600 55 1185 935 60 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I
Duration 0.25
Area Type: All
other
areas
Signal
Operations
Phase Combination
1
2 3
4 1
5
6 7 8
EB Left
A
I NB
Left,
A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
WB Left
A
I SB
Left
A
P.
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
i
Peds
X
NB Right
I EB
Right
SB Right
I WB
Right
A
Green
30.0
8.0
51.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
4.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
,Intersection Performance Summary
,)pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group _ Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 380 1226 0.07 0.31 24.4 C
TR 493 1643 0.06 0.30 25.0 C 24.7 C
Westbound
LT 414
1380
0.19
0.30
26.2
C 23.3
C
R 681
1583
0.57
0.43
22.7
C
Northbound
L 387
1770
0.07
0.60
8.7
A
TR 2581
5060
0.67
0.51
15.2
B 15.1
B
Southbound
L 269
1770
0.72
0.60
30.0
C
TR 2570
5039.
0.41
0.51
11.9
B 14.7
B
Intersection
Delay
= 16.2
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
272 Glen Haven Drive
veland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
APPENDIX D
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 7/18/02
Analysis Time Period: am
l Intersection: Coege/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: hort long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
or Street: Approach Northbound . Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
1705
15
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.90
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
1894
16
Percent Heavy Vehicles -- --,
--
--
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
No
Lanes
2 1
Configuration
T R
Upstream Signal? No
No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
volume 5
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade 0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config I I R
v (vph)
5
C(m) (vph)
735
v/tc
0.01
95% queue length
0.02
Control Delay
9.9
LOS
A
Approach Delay
9.9
Approach LOS
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
:e Performed: 7/18/02
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: ollege/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1126 5
Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 2 1
Configuration T R
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
,jlume 10
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade M 0 0
Median Storage .
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
Lane Config I' I R
v (vph) 11
C(m) (vph) 867
v/c 0.01
95% queue length 0.04
Control Delay 9.2
LOS A
Approach Delay 9.2
Approach LOS A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
APPENDIX C
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fairway
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 7 18/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: am m Year recent short Eon kgrd total
eject ID: 0106
St: Fairway N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
i Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 I
LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L TR I
volume 185 10 30 140 10 100 150 1890 100 1100 1090 120 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I.
Duration 0.25
Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination
1
2 3 4 1
5 6
EB Left
A
I NB Left
A P
Thru
A
I Thru
P
Right
A
I Right
P
Peds
X
I Peds
X
WB Left
A
I SB Left
A P
Thru
A
I Thru
P
Right
A
I Right
P
Peds
X
I Peds
X
NB Right
I EB Right
A
SB Right
I WB Right
Green
26.0
8.0
55.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
4.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0
Intersection Performance
Summary
._,.pr/
Lane Adj Sat Ratios
Lane Group
Approach
Lane
Group Flow Rate
Grp
Capacity (s) v/c g/C
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
secs
Eastbound
L 324
1200
0.29
0.27
29.4
C
T 484
1863
0.02
0.26
27.6
C 26.8 C
R 617
1583
0.05
0.39
19.0
B
Westbound
L 363
1346
0.12
0.27
27.7
C
TR 418
1609
0.29
0.26
30.0
C 29.4 C
Northbound
L 358 1770 0.15 0.64 7.5 A
TR 2776 5047 0.75 0.55 13.7 B 13.6 B
Southbound
L 270 1770 0.39 0.64 13.4 B
TR 2756 5010 0.46 0.55 9.8 A 10.1 B
Intersection Delay = 13.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
"72 Glen Haven Drive
eland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
hu:Z vUU: Signalizes Intersections Release 4.1b
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 7/18 02 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: am pm Year recent short ong kgrd total
Project ID: 106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron NIS St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I L T R
I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0
LGConfig I L TR
Volume 170 5 30
Lane Width 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0
I Westbound
I L T R
I
I' 0 1 1
I LT R
150 5 275
I 12.0 12.0
I 0
I Northbound I Southbound 1
I L T R J L T R
I I I
1 1 3 0 i 1 3 0 1
I L TR I L TR i
15 1495 65 1355 1665 20 1
112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
I 0 1 0
Duration 0.25
Area
Type: All other
areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2
3 4 1
5
6 7 8
EB Left
A
I NB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
1
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
WB Left
A
1 SB
Left
A
A P
Thru
A
I
Thru
A P
Right
A
I
Right
A P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
NB Right
I EB
Right
SB Right
I WB
Right
A
A
Green
24.0
6.0
10.0 50.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
0.0 3.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection
Performance
Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane Group
Approach
Lane Group
Flow Rate
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c g/C
Delay
LOS
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 313 1250 0.25 0.25 30.4 C
TR 390 1626 0.10 0.24 29.7 C 30.2 C
Westbound
LT 332
1385
0.19
0.24
30.5
C 21.1
C
R 712
1583
0.43
0.45
19.2
B
Northbound
L 314
1770
0.02
0.58
8.9
A
TR 2527
5054
0.65
0.50
15.5
B 15.5
B
Southbound
L 410
1770
0.91
0.67
52.8
D
TR 3046
5076
0.58
0.60
7.4
A 15.3
B
Intersection
Delay
= 16.3
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax:(970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
HCSLUUU: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Analyst: Michael
Inter.:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Agency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
Date:
Period:
7 18/02
pm
Jurisd:
Year
Fort Collins
on kgrd
recent short total
--oject
D• 0106
1 St:
Fossil Creek/Cameron
N/S St:
College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L T R
I L T R
I L T R
I L T R 1
No. Lanes
I
I 1 1 0
I
1 0 1 1
I
1 1 3 0
i I
I 1 3 0 I
LGConfig
i L TR
I LT R
I L TR
I L TR I
Volume
110 5 10
165 5 350
125 1595 55
1185 925 55 1
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
1 12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left A P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A i Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left A P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right A
Green 30.0 8.0 51.0
Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0.
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance.Summary
_pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 380 1226 0.03 0.31 24.1 C
TR 505 1682 0.03 0.30 24.8 C 24.5 C
Westbound
LT
418
1394
0.19
0.30
26.2
C
23.3 C
R
681
1583
0.57
0.43
22.7
C
Northbound
L
391
1770
0.07
0.60
8.7
A
TR
2581
5060
0.67
0.51
15.1
B
15.1 B
Southbound
L
269
1770
0.72
0.60
30.0
C
TR
2571
5042
0.40
0.51
11.8
B
14.7 B
Intersection
Delay = 16.1
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000:
Signalized
Intersections
Release
4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2172 Glen Haven Drive
eland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
APPENDIX B
Table 4-3
Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (intersections
Commercial Other corridors within
corridors'
Inters; Mixed use Low density mixed. All other*.'
districts use residential areas
Signalized D E' I D D.
intersections
(overall)
Stop sign control NIA F•' F" E
(arterial/local--any
approach leg)
Stop sign control. NIA C C. C
(collector/local--
any approach leg)
mitigating measures required
considered normal in an urban environment
Page 4-22 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standard
January 2,2001
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 7/18 02
Analysis Time Period: am
Intersection: College/Fairway
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: shor long bkgrd otal
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: Fairway
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs)• 0.25
Vehicle
Volumes and
Adjustments
Major Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
2
3 1
4
5
6
L
T
R I
L
T
R
Volume
20
1510
15
30
1695
30
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.90 0.90
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
21
1641
16
33
1827
33
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
--
--
2
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1 2 1
1 2 1
Configuration
L T R
L T R
Upstream Signal?
Yes
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement
7
8
9 I
10
11
12
L
T
R I
L
T
R
Volume
35
0
40
35
0
25
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
0.85 0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
41
0
47
41
0
29
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
2
2
2
2
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
0 1 1
1
1 1
Configuration
LT R
L
T R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
Lane Config L L I LT R I L T R
v (vph)
21
33
41
47
41
0
29
C(m) (vph)
321
474
92
828
57
64
276
v/c
0.07
0.07
0.45
0.06
0.72
0.00
0.11
95% queue length
0.21
0.22
1.87
0.18
3.05
0.00
0.35
Control Delay
17.0
13.2
72.4
9.6
161.3
61.3
19.6
LOS
C
B
F
A
F
F
C
Approach Delay
38.9
102.6
Approach LOS
E
F
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Michael P. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
--ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
e Performed: 7/18/02
_.alysis Time Period: m pm
Intersection: ollege/Fairway
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short long bkgrd total'
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: Fairway
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
10
1610
30
30
955
15
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.87
0.87
0.87
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
11
1894
35
34
1097
17
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
--
--
2
--
--
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1
2 1
1
2 1
Configuration
L
T R
L
T R
Upstream Signal?
Yes
No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Fume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade M
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
15
0
25
30
0
5
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
17
0
29
35
0
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
RT Channelized? No No
Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1
Configuration LT R L T R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config L L I LT R I L T R
v (vph)
11
34
17
29
35.
0
5 .
C(m) (vph)
623
353
96
807
145
81
480
v/c
0.02
0.10
0.18
0.04
0.24
0.00
0.01
95% queue length
0.05
0.32
0.61
0.11
0.90
0.00
0.03
Control Delay
10.9
16.3
50.4
9.6
37.6
49.4
12.6
LOS
B
C
F
A
E
E
B
Approach Delay
24.7
34.4
Approach LOS
C
D
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Michael P. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
ril.JGuuu: Jignaiizea intersections Keiease 4.10
Analyst:
Michael
Inter.:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Agency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
Date:
Period:
7/181 02
am p
Jurisd:
Year
Fort Coll' s
recent hort long bkgr otal
Project
ID: 0106
E/W St:
Fossil Creek/Cameron
NIS St:
College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound 1
Southbound i
I L
1
T R
I L
I
T R
I L
T
R I
L T
R 1
No. Lanes I 1
1 0
1 0
I
2
I
1 1
1 2
I
1 1
1 1
I 1
LGConfig I L
TR
I
LT R
1 L
T
R I
L T
R 1
Volume 180
5 35
140
5 240
115
1230
55 1310 1365
35 I
Lane Width 112.0
12.0
1
12.0 12.0
112.0
12.0
12.0 112.0
12.0
12.0 I
RTOR Vol 1
0
I
0
1
0 I
0 I
Duration 0.25
Area
Type:
All other
areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2
3
4 1
5
6
7 8
EB Left
A
I NB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
1
Thru
P
Right
A
1
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
WB Left
A
1 SB
Left
A
A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
A
P
Right
A
I
Right
A
P
Peds
X
1
Peds
X
NB Right
1 EB
Right
SB Right
I WB
Right
A
A
Green
25.0
6.0
10.0
48.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle
Length:
100.0
secs
Intersection
Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane Group
Approach
Lane Group
Flow Rate
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C
Delay
LOS
Delay
LOS
Eastbound
L 336
1294
0.28
0.26
30.0
C
TR 405
1619
0.12
0.25
29.1
C
29.7
C
Westbound
LT 353
1411
0.15
0.25
29.4
C
19.9
B
R 728
1583
0.39
0.46
18.1
B
Northbound
L 333
1770
0.05
0.56
10.4
B
T 1699
3539
0.79
0.48
21.1
C
20.7
C
R 760
1583
0.08
0.48
14.3
B
Southbound
L 411
1770
0.84
0.65
41.7
D
T 2053
3539
0.74
0.58
11.0
B
16.6
B.
R 918
1583
0.04
0.58
9.1
A
Intersection
Delay
= 18.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
Fax: (970) 669-5034
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
HCSZUUU: Signalized intersections Keiease 4.In
An
Michael
Inter.:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Agency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
Date:
Period:
7/18/02
opm
Jurisd:
Year
Fort Col s
recent short long bkgrd ED
ject
ID: 0106
St:
Fossil Creek/Cameron
N/S St:
College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L T R
I L T R
I L T
R
I L T
I
R I
I
No. Lanes
i
1 1 1 0
I
I 0 1 1
I
1 1 2
1
I 1 2
1 1
LGConfig
I L TR
I LT R
I L T
R
I L T
R I
Volume
125 5 20
155 5 320
125 1310
40
1160 765
60 1
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
1 12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0 1
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 0
1
0
1
0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left A P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left A P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right A
Green 28.0 7.0 54.0
Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Sntersection Performance Summary
tppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp.. Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 363 1251
TR 459 1639.
Westbound
0.08 0.29 25.9 C
0.07 0.28 26.5 C 26.2 C
LT
391
1395
0.17
0.28
27.5
C 25.0 C
R
633
1583
0.57
0.40
24.5
C
Northbound
L
424
1770
0.07
0.62
8.0
A
T
1911
3539
0.81
0.54
16.9
B 16.6 B
R
855
1583
0.05
0.54
11.0
B
Southbound
L
251
1770
0.73
0.62
33.0
C
T
1911
3539
0.46
0.54
10.7
B 14.3 B
R
855
1583
0.08
0.54
11.2
B
Intersection
Delay = 17.1
(sec/veh)
Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000:
Signalized
Intersections
Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
72 Glen Haven Drive
ieland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 7/18/02
Analysis Time Period: a pm
Intersection: Co ege/Fairway
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short long kgrd otal
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: Fairway
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
10
1500
15
30
1615
25
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.90
0.90
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
10
1630
16
33
1794
27
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
--
--
2
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1
2 1
1
2 1
Configuration
L
T R
L
T R
Upstream Signal?
Yes
No
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
7
L
Westbound
8
T
9 1
R I
Eastbound
10 11
L T
12
R
Volume
35
0
40
25 0
25
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
0.85 0.85
0.85
0.85 0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
41
0
47
29 0
29
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
2
2 2
2
Percent Grade M
0
0
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
0 1 1
1 1 1
Configuration
LT R
L T R
Delay,
Queue
Length, and Level of
Service
Approach NB
SB
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement 1
4
1 7
8 9
1 10 11
12
Lane Config L
L
I LT
R
I L T
R
v (vph)
10
33
41
47
29
0
29
C(m) (vph)
332
478
101
831
60
68
283
v/c
0.03
0.07
0.41
0.06
0.48
0.00
0.10
95% queue length
0.09
0.22
1.68
0.18
1.89
0.00
0.34
Control Delay
16.2
13.1
63.1
9.6
111.7
57.9
19.2
LOS
C
B
F
A
F
F
C
Approach Delay
34.5
65.5
Approach LOS
D
F
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Michael P. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst:
Michael
A-ency/Co.:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
e Performed:
7 18/02
elysis Time Period:
fam m
Intersection:
ollege/Fairway
Jurisdiction:
Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year:
short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street:
Fairway
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
5
1595
30
30
945
15
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.87
0.87
0.87
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
5
1876
35
34
1086
17
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
--
--
2
--
--
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1
2 1
1
2 1
Configuration
L
T R
L
T R
Upstream Signal?
Yes
No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
_ume
Peak Hour. Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
15
0
25
15
0
5
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
17
0
29
17
0
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
RT Channelized? No No
Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 1
Configuration LT R L T R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config L L I LT R I L T R
v (vph)
5
34
17
29
17
0
5
C(m) (vph)
629
360
102
807
149
85
484
v/c
0.01
0.09
0.17
0.04
0.11
0.00
0.01
95% queue length
0.02
0.31
0.57
0.11
0.38
0.00
0.03
Control Delay
10.8
16.0
47.2
9.6
32.2
47.4
12.5
LOS
B
C
E
A
D
E
B
Approach Delay
23.5
27.8
Approach LOS
C
D
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Michael P. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Signalized intersections Release 4.io
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 7/18/02 Jurisd: Fort Coll' s
Period: am( mYear recent hor lon bkgr total
Project ID. 06
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron NIS St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
1 I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 I
LGConfig I L TR I LT R I,L T R I L T R I
Volume 170 5 30 140 5 240 15 1220 55 1310 1360 20 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left A P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left A A P
Thru A I Thru A P
Right A i Right A P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right A A
Green 25.0 6.0 10.0 48.0
Yellow 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
'Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 336 1294
TR 406 1624
Westbound
LT
354
1417
R
728
1583
Northbound
L
334
1770
T
1699
3539
R
760
1583
Southbound
L
411
1770
T
2053
3539
R
918
1583
Intersection
Delay
0.24
0.26
29.6
C
0.10
0.25
29.0
C
29.4
C
0.15
0.25
29.4
C
19.9
B
0.39
0.46
18..1
B
0.01
0.56
10.3
B
0.78
0.48
20.8
C
20.5
C
0.08
0.48
14.3
B
0.84
0.65
41.7
D
0.74
0.58
11.0
B
16.6
B
0.02
0.58
9.0
A
= 18.8
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
HC5[000: Jignalizeo intersections xeiease y.iu
Analyst: Michael
Inter.:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Agency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
Date:
Period:
7L18/02
pm
Jurisd:
Year
Fort Colli s
recent short kgrd long btotal
eject
l/am
0106
St:
Fossil Creek/Cameron
N/S St:
College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound 1
1 L.
T R
I L T R
I L T R
I L T R I
I I
I
No. Lanes 1 1
I
I
1 1 2 1 1
i 1 2 1
1 0 1 1
1 0
LGConfig I L
TR
I LT R
I L T R I L T R I
volume I10
5 10
155 5 320
125 1305 40
1160 755 55 1
Lane Width 112.0
12.0
1 12.0 12.0
112.0.12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1
0
1 0
1 0
I 0 1
Duration 0.25
Area
Type: All other
areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination
1 2
3 4 1
5
6 7 8
EB Left
A
I NB
Left A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
WB Left
A
I SB
Left A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
NB Right
i EB
Right
SB Right
I WB
Right A
Green
28.0
7.0
54.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
4.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
.-epr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane Group
Approach
Lane Group
Flow Rate
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c g/C
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 363 1251 0.03 0.29 25.5 C
TR 469 1676 0.04 0.28 26.2 C 25.9C
Westbound
LT
395
1410
R
633
1583
Northbound
L
428
1770
T
1911
3539
R
855
1583
Southbound
L
251
1770
T
1911
3539
R
855
.1583
Intersection
Delay
0.17
0.28
27.4
C 25.0
C
0.57
0.40
24.5
C
0.07
0.62
8.0
A
0.80
0.54
16.8
B 16.4
B
0.05
0.54
11.0
B
0.73
0.62
33.0
C
0.45
0.54
10.6
B 14.3
B
0.07
0.54
11.2
B
= 16.9
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
^72 Glen Haven Drive
,eland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
APPENDIX A
m
m
4)
0
U
Fairway
r-- - Denotes Lane
Can � Fossil Creek
N
LONG RANGE (2020) GEOMETRY Figure 9
TABLES
Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation
-
e-
@g.«I 1cF' w y, y
2y"?t� �t��y—
fP 'k,-•'"ARS!-
>yy i
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
(signal)
OVERALL
B
B
College/Fairway
(signal)
OVERALL
B
B
College/Fossil Boulevard
(RT-in/RT-out)
EB RT
A
A
Cameron
Fairway
� - Denotes Lane
Fossil Creek
N
SHORT RANGE (2005) GEOMETRY Figure 7
TABLE 4
Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Operation
VU
pf 7.)`.!•_
.,G.�g"�dci^ M
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
(signal)
OVERALL
B
B
College/Fairway
(stop sign)
WB LT/T
F
F
WB RT
A
A
WB APPROACH
C
E
EB LT
E
F
EB T
E
F
EB RT
B
C
EB APPROACH
D
F
NB LT
B
C
SB LT
C
B
College/Fossil Boulevard
(RT-in/RT-out)
EB RT
A
A
Cameron
30/35
0/0
—�
5/25
U.) O
Co
O
JI
10/5
25/80
5/5
20/35
SHORT RANGE (2005) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
rn
0
U
25/40
f 0/0
15/35
320/240
5/10
55/40
f r
LO O LO
r) LO
LO O
N O V
M
Fairway
+ AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Fossil Creek
A&
N
Figure 6
TABLE 2
Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Operation
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
(signal)
OVERALL
B
B
College/Fairway
(stop sign)
WB LT/T
E
F
WB RT
A
A
WB APPROACH
C
D
EB LT
D
F
EBT
E
F
EB RT
B
C
EB APPROACH
D
F
NB LT
B
C
SB LT
C
B
TABLE 3
Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
(signal)
OVERALL
B
B
College/Fairway
(signal)
OVERALL
I
B
I
B
I
LO
(0
Ln 00 O
N T O
o rn o
N O O
-JT 1T T
i 1
85/190
10/15 —�
30/60
LO
LO
LO
N M
� N o0D
to )
i 1
m
LA
m
O
U
100/150
--m--10/15
40/100
f r
O O to
L` T
tz
O O
0 O
O
rn
m
T
N 350/275
--a-5/5
65/50
Cameron
10170 � )
5/5 � Lc LO
10/30 �. N v LO
LLo
rn
LO
T
Fairway
AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Fossil Creek
A&
N
LONG RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND Figure 5
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Cameron
LO
cfl
Ln 0
LO It
Jam- ) CV)
f i
15/25
0/0 —�
5/25
0
(D 0
M T
N CO
LO 0
U') LO 00
f 1
C
rn
d
U
N
25/40
--0-0/0
15/35
t r Fairway
0 0 LO
0
LOLO
o
LO
M
L
320/240
---m-- 5/5
55/40
10l70
1
f
r
5/5
10/30
LO
N
0
N
LO
o
0
mwAM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Fossil Creek
SHORT RANGE (2005) BACKGROUND Figure 4
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
e-
16/8
rn
N
9/4
Site
N" '.000,
Cameron
N
N
J
-�— AM/PM
Fairway
Fossil Creek
N
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3
TABLE I
Trip Generation
North Area
230
Townhome
68 D.U.
5.86
1 398
10.07
5
0.37
25
0.36
1 5
2
0.18
12
South Area
230 Townhome
64 D.U.
5.86
375
0.07
4
0.37
24
0.36
23
0.18
12
Total
773
9
49
48
24
NO SCi,._-
r—
FF17J7FFTJi I. i iTTFMT'pU,7TFrTTl ?T p
- -
� H F
A
r
i FOSSIL BOVLEVMD
10
ICY Lf
FOSSC CREEK OFFICE PARK WROMADO COURT ••'
�, ..CK 13 " , o
�✓ 14
2 `o
'a u =4.0
F =Eff p
l �CAIY¢RON PARK OFFICE PARK
4
pl.R leaf CpLB ___
f1Nf..L�aUVIYf
IU(D 1'0.
:1
SITE PLAN Figure 2
4
N
N
O
L
co
cr
N
O
U
Harmon
Redtail DP
_
cc
E
'
G
J
Cameron
oss,� 'Y
C„
OD
0
N
U)
Trilby
SCALE: 1"=2000'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
A comment was made regarding the consistency of traffic forecasts
with those in the "South College Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update
Report." When Kathleen Reavis was contacted in early 2001 regarding this
document, she provided information regarding the access points, but no
information with regard to traffic forecasts. Therefore, Mark Jackson was
contacted to get traffic forecasts. The peak hour forecasts in the
transportation impact study are consistent with those supplied by Mark
Jackson.
Two additional pedestrian destinations were requested by City staff.
These are the Mason Street Corridor (park/ride station) and the Werner
Elementary School (east of College Avenue). Appendix E contains a
pedestrian level of service worksheet showing these two destinations. The
Mason Street Corridor will meet acceptable pedestrian level of service
criteria once the sidewalk system is built within Redtail and once the City
makes the necessary improvements related to the Mason Street Corridor
park/ride station. The pedestrian level of service cannot meet the minimum
criteria for all factors for the Werner Elementary School. This is
primarily due to street crossings and continuity. There are no sidewalks
in the Fossil Creek residential area east of College Avenue. This is a
county subdivision and sidewalks were not required, nor are they desired
by the residents. There is little that can be done to improve this. When
the raised median is built by the City/CDOT in South College Avenue, the
street crossing factor will be acceptable.
Currently, bicycles use the shoulders along College Avenue as bike
lanes. Generally, this is considered to be safe for the few bicyclists
that use College Avenue. Where there are striped acceleration or
deceleration lanes on College Avenue, the bicyclists share this area with
the motor vehicles. Since the bicycle traffic is low, this situation is
generally acceptable. When College Avenue is restriped to be a six -lane
facility, it is recommended that bicycles not be allowed to use College
Avenue. This recommendation is consistent with the "no bike" policy on
College Avenue north of Harmony Road.
Traffic volumes on Fossil Boulevard (RT-in/RT-out) will be less than
1000 vehicles per day. This indicates that Fossil Boulevard should be
classified as a residential, local street. Traffic volumes on Cameron
Drive, just west of South College Avenue, will be 1500-2000 vehicles per
day. These volumes are commensurate with that of a connector, local
street. Traffic volumes will progressively decrease on Cameron Drive, to
the west, toward the south portion of Redtail. In the new segment of
Cameron Drive (to be constructed with this development), traffic volumes
will be less than 1000 vehicles per, day. This indicates that the new
segment of Cameron Drive should be classified as a residential, local
street.
r..
1
intersection will be commensurate with level of service D/E/F in the peak
hours. This intersection is in a commercial corridor. The Fort Collins
Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections), also provided in Appendix A,
indicates that the level of service at a stop sign controlled intersection
is N/A (not applicable). It is assumed that, when signal warrants are met,
this intersection will be signalized. Until that occurs, the
calculated/actual operation is deemed to be acceptable. Table 3 shows the
operation of the key intersections with the long range background peak hour
traffic. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. With the warranted
signalization, the key intersections will operate acceptably.
Figure 6 shows the short range (2005) total peak hour traffic at the
key intersections. Table 4 shows the short range peak hour operation using
the traffic forecasts shown in Figure 6. Calculation forms are provided
in Appendix C. The key intersections will operate similarly to that shown
with the background traffic. Figure 7 shows the short range geometry at
the key intersections.
Figure 8 shows the long range (2020) total peak hour traffic at the
key intersections. Table 5 shows the long range peak hour operation using
the traffic forecasts shown in Figure 8. Calculation forms are provided
in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably. Figure 9
shows the long range geometry at the key intersections.
In the staff comments, reference was made to the proximity of the
Cameron/Frontage Road intersection to College Avenue. This is an existing
situation. The close proximity does cause operational concerns regarding
blockage of the Frontage Road by eastbound traffic on Cameron Drive
approaching College Avenue. This situation exists elsewhere in Fort
Collins. It is recommended that signs be placed stating "DO NOT BLOCK
INTERSECTION." Elimination of the Frontage Road does not appear to be an
option, since it serves the parking lot for Cameron Office Park, Parcel 1
on the south leg of the frontage road, and the Fossil Creek Office Park
(Coronado Court) on the north leg of the frontage road. The site plan for
the Cameron Office Park shows a parking lot connection between Cameron
Drive and Coronado Court. This connection provides an option of not using
the Frontage Road by some of the traffic. If the existing median on
Cameron Drive is extended to the east, it will cover the frontage road.
This will force U-turns at the west end of the existing median. These U-
turns will be difficult, if not impossible, for most vehicle types. While
the median treatment may be perceived as an ideal solution, it does not
deal with the reality of accessing certain properties in an established
business park.
Staff indicated the potential need for a center median in South
College Avenue from Cameron Drive to Fairway Lane. This median is
mentioned in the "South College Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update
Report" as an element of the Long Range Access Plan. It is not mentioned
as part of the Short -Term Access Plan. Therefore, the median treatment is
part of the 20-year plan: It is appropriate that the medianization of
South College Avenue proceed in an orderly fashion from north to south, as
it has in the past. Construction of isolated medians is not recommended.
It is more appropriate that this median be built when South College Avenue
is widened to the major arterial (6 through lanes) cross section.' The
suggested treatment at the Fossil Boulevard (RT-in/RT-out) intersection
with South College Avenue is that .of a channelization island that will
discourage left -in and left -out movements. This design has been prepared
by J.R. Engineering.
CD
co
Lo
o
CO co
O
LO
O
o �p
a CD Cr,
O p
O r
U °D
• X
6
Z u
Z
a
J
w
O
J
• ro
w O
> N
a d>
0
o
a �
w zJ Z
C7 =
N 4
r-
N
N
W
(L
z
FE
w
z
U
_ z
J W
W o
0
¢
O
� a
Z
z
` a
5 ¢ F-
W as
U
F- Q
¢
Ca
G
MEMORANDUM PP:00
-REC�S
TO: Jon Prouty, Lagunitas Companies
Cathy Mathis, VF Ripley v e
City of Fort Collins �✓
FROM: Matt DelichS/ALG\r
DATE: July 23, 2002
SUBJECT: Redtail PDP Transportation Impact Study Addendum
(File: 0106ME02)
The Redtail PDP, located east of the College/Fossil Creek/
Cameron intersection, Figure 1, has been revised. Figure 2 shows the
new site plan. As indicated on Figure 2, access to the site has been
changed to include access to Fairway Lane to the north. Also,
Cameron Drive will not connect with Fossil Boulevard to the north.
With this street configuration, the northern portion of the site will
have access to Fairway Lane .and Fossil Boulevard only. In addition
to this, the proposed land uses have been changed. This addendum
addresses the staff comments contained in the Staff Project Review
dated April 23, 2002. Contact with Transportation Planning and
Traffic Operations indicated that a memorandum addressing the
comments and changes would be necessary.
The new site plan shows that all of Redtail has been changed to
all residential land uses. Table 1 shows the new trip generation
estimate for Redtail. There -will be a reduction in the trip
generation compared to the previous Redtail plan. The peak hour trip
generation will be reduced by 25-35 percent. In addition to this,
the site plan shows that access to the northern portion of the site
will be via the College/Fairway and College/Fossil Boulevard (RT-
in/RT-out) intersections, and access to the southern portion of the
site will be via the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. The
College/Fossil Boulevard (RT-in/RT-out) intersection is shown on the
"South College Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update Report,"
February 2002, at a conceptual location just north of where it is
shown on the site plan. Figure 3 shows the assignment of the site
generated traffic at the key intersections.
Figures 4 and 5 show the short range (2005) and long range
(2020) background peak hour traffic at the key intersections. It is
expected that traffic signals would not be warranted at the College/
Fairway intersection in the shortrange future. However, as further
development occurs to the east and west, signals would likely be
warranted at this intersection. The College/Fairway intersection is
shown as a future signalized intersection on the "South College
Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update Report." The right-
in/right-out access (Fossil Boulevard) to College Avenue is also
shown on the "South College Avenue (US287) Access Control Plan Update
Report." Table 2 shows the operation of the key intersections with
the short range background peak hour traffic. Calculation forms are
provided in Appendix A. The College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
intersection will operate acceptably. With the existing stop sign
control, the delays to the Fairway Lane legs of the College/Fairway
Muitimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P.18
LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian
Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
TZ-atis(T F/'cCU.ITy
�aC,s tior CutIoT
City of furl Calllns Trimsporlalion Master Plan
APPENDIX E
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: - Michael
"-*ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
:e Performed: 12/17/01
.-.alysis Time Period: am®
Intersection: College/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short &bkgrd GD
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
1360 15
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
1431 15
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
2. 0
Configuration
T TR
Upstream Signal? No
No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
-ume 15
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config I I R
v (vph) 15
C(m) (vph) 810
v/c 0.02
95% queue length 0.06
Control Delay 9.5
LOS A
Approach Delay 9.5
Approach LOS A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: / 7/01
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: ollege/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume 783 5
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 824 5
Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes 2 0
Configuration T TR
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
volume 1U
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade ($) 0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config I I R
v (vph)
10
C(m) (vph)
922
v/c
0.01
95% queue length
0.03
Control Delay
8.9
LOS
A
Approach Delay
8.9
Approach LOS
A
HCS2000
Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
f
Intersection Performance
Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane
Group
Approach
'ie Group
Flow Rate
p Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C
Delay
LOS
Delay
LOS
Eastbound
L 379
1149
0.56
0.33
29.3
C
T 627
1900
0.03
0.33
22.7
C
27.7
C
R 533
1615
0.12
0.33
23.5
C
Westbound
L 468
1419
0.22
0.33
24.5
C
TR 542
1641
0.32
0.33
25.4
C
25.1
C
Northbound
L 275
1805
0.23
0.57
19.1
B
TR 2320
5155
0.82
0.45
27.2
C
27.0
C
Southbound
L 275
1805
0.38
0.57
17.8
B
TR 2312
5137
0.93
0.45
33.9
C
33.1
C
Intersection
Delay
= 29.8
(sec/veh) Intersection
LOS = C
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst:
Agency/Co.:
Date Performed:
Analysis Time Period:
Intersection:
Area Type:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID: 0106
fairway
matt
mjdpe
12/17/01
am
college/fairway
All other areas
fort collins
20 0
East/West Street North/South Street
college
r
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 322
1288
0.34
0.25
31.4
C
T 475
1900
0.02
0.25
28.3
C
30.7
C
R 404
1615
0.08
0.25
28.8
C
Westbound
L 357
1426
0.12
0.25
29.1
C
TR 411
1642
0.28
0.25
30.6
C
30.2
C
Northbound
L 343
1805
0.17
0.65
8.2
A
TR 2728
5148
0.78
0.53
21.0
C
20.7
C
Southbound
L 275
1805
0.38
0.65
15.9
B
TR 2709
5111
0.48
0.53
15.4
B
15.4
B
Intersection
Delay
= 19.6
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Phone:
E-Mail:
Analyst:
Agency/Co.:
Date Performed:
Analysis Time Period:
Intersection:
Area Type:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID: 0106
fairway
Fax:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
matt
mj dpe
12/17/01
pm
college/fairway
All other areas
f Collins
202
East/West Street
-ram
North/South Street.
college
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Analyst: matt
!ncy: mjdpe
1 Pori pm
Peri7/01
od:
Projectam pm
0106
E/W St: fairway
Inter.: college/fairway
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: fort collins
Year :C!T) .
N/S St: college
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
SUMMARY_
I Eastbound I Westbound
I Northbound
I L T R i L T R
I
I L
T R
No. Lanes
I
I
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
3 0
LGConfig
I L T R I L TR
I L
TR
Volume
1105 10 30 140 10 100
155
1915 100
Lane Width
11.2.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
112.0
12.0
RTOR Vol
1 0 1 0
1
0
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination 1
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
3B Right
Breen
25.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
Area Type: All other
areas
Signal Operations
2 3 4 1
I NB
Left
I
Thru
I
Right
I
Peds
1 _SB
Left
I
Thru
I
Right
I
Peds
I EB
Right
1 WB
Right
M
0
I Southbound
I L T R
I_
i 1 3 0
I L TR
1100 1105 120
112.0 12.0
1 0
6
7
8
P
P
F=
P
X
P
P-
P
X
12.0 53.0
3.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0
secs
Intersection Performance Summary_
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Eastbound
Approach
Delay LOS
L 310
1193
0.29
0.26
30.1
C
TR 387
1613
0.12
0.24
29.9
C
30.0
C
Westbound
LT 339
1412
0.19
0.24
30.5
C
21.0
C
R 712
1583
0.41
0.45
18.9
B
Northbound
L 339
1770
0.05
0.59
8.6
A
TR 2476
5054
0.67
0.49
16.5
B
16.5
B
Southbound
L 429
1770
0.87
0.67
45.2
D
TR 2988
5065
0.60'
0.59
8.2
A
14.5
B
Intersection
Delay
= 16.3
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-20.61 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/1, 01
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short on bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
E
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Analyst: Michael
lency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
.te: 2/16/01
Period: am
Project ID: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
No. Lanes
LGConfig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort'Collins
Year : recent short lon bkgrd 6ED
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound 1
I L T R
I
I L T R
1 L
T R
I L T R I
I
I
I 1
I I
I 1 1 0
1 0 1 1
3 0
1 1 3 0 1
I L TR
1 LT R
I L
TR
I L TR 1
185 5 40
150 10 275
115
1505 65
1355 1670 45 I
112.0 12.0
1 12.0 12.0
112.0
12.0
112.0 12.0 1
1 0
I 0
1
0
1 0 i
Duration 0.25
Area Type: All
other
areas
Signal
Operations_
Phase Combination
1
2 3
4 1
EB Left.
A
I NB
Left
Thru
A
I
Thru
Right
A
i
Right
Peds
X
I
Peds
WB Left
A
1 SB
Left
Thru
A
1
Thru
Right
A
1
Right
Peds
X
1
Peds
NB Right
i EB
Right
SB Right
1 WB
Right
Green
24.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
5 6
7
8
A
P
P
P
X
A A
P
A
P
A
P
X
A A
6.0 10.0 49.0
0.0 0.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
i
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 400
1251
0.09
TR 520
1679
0.06
Westbound
LT 428
1382
0.17
R 697
1583
0.53
Northbound
L 379
1770
0.08
TR 2530
5060
0.69
Southbound
L 269
1770
0.74
TR 2518
5036
0.42
Intersection Delay = 16.8
0.32 23.9 C
0.31 24.3 C
Approach
Delay LOS
24.1 C
0.31
25.3
C 21.9 C
0.44
21.2
C
0.59
9.2
A
0.50
16.2
B 16.0 B
0.59
32.0
C
0.50
12.6
B 15.7 B
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2116/01
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short lon bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Analyst:
Michael
Inter.:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Tency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
ate: '
2/16/01
Jurisd:
Fort Collins
Period:
pm
Year
recent short ong bkgrd total
Project
rD: 0106
E/W St:
Fossil Creek/Cameron
N/S St:
College
Eastbound
L T R
I
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound I Northbound
I L T R I L T R
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 0
LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L TR
Volume 135 10 20 165 5 350 130 1600 55
Lane Width 1.12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination 1
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
SB Right
Green
31.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations_
2 3 4 1
1 NB Left
I Thru
i Right
1 Peds
I SB Left
1 Thru
I Right
I Peds
1 EB Right
I WB Right
I Southbound
L T R
I
I 1 3 0
I L TR
1190 935 65
112.0 12.0
1 0
5
6 7 8
A
P
P
P
X
A
P
P
P
X
A
8.0
50.0.
0.0
4.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0
secs
APPENDIX D
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 12/17/01
Analysis Time Period: am
Intersection: College/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short long bkgr total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume 1700 15
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1789 15
Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 2 1
Configuration T R
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage -
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Delay,
Approach NB
Movement 1
Lane Config
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
0
Queue Length, and Level
SB Westbound
4 1 7 8 9
0.95
5
2
0
No
1
R
of Service
Eastbound
I 10 11 12
1 R
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
9.8
A
752
0.01
0.02
9.8
A
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst:. matt
Agency/Co.: mjdpe
Date Performed: 12/11
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: college/fairway
Jurisdiction: fort collins
Units: U. S. Customary,-,.-,,
Analysis Year: 200 2020 bakgrd tota
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: fairway lane
North/South Street: college
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
20
1515
15
30
1655
30
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
21
1594
15
31
1742
31
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
--
--
0
--
--
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1
2 1
1
2 1
Configuration
L
T R
L
T R
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
7
L
Westbound
8
T
9
R
Eastbound
I 10 11
I L T
12
R
Volume
35
0
40
35 0
25
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.95 0.95
0.95
0.95 0.95
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
36
0
42
36 0
26
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0 0
0
Percent Grade (4)
0
0
Median Storage
1
Flared Approach:
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
0 1 1
1 1 1
Configuration
LT R
L T R
Delay,
Queue
Length, and Level
of Service
Approach
NB
SB
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement
1
4
1 7
8
9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config
L
L
I LT
R I L T
R
v (vph)
21
31
36
42
36
0
26
C(m) (vph)
356
411
68
334
57
57
298
v/c
0.06
0.08
0.53
0.13
0.63
0.00
0.09
95% queue length
0.19
0.24
2.18
0.43
2.59
0.00
0.28
Control Delay
15.7
14.5
106.4
17.3
142.8
68.2
18.2
LOS
C
B
F
C
F
F
C
Approach Delay
58.4
90.6
Approach LOS
F
F
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: matt
P--ncy/Co.: mjdpe
Performed: 2�,�417/01 pm
r.._slysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: lege/fairway
Jurisdiction: fort collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2005 2020 bakgrd
Project.ID: 0106
East/West Street: fairway lane
North/South Street: college
Intersection Orientation: NS
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound . Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
10
1620
30
30
965
15
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
10
1705
31
31
1015
15
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
--
--
0
--
--
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1
2 1
1
2 1
Configuration
L
T R
L
T R
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
. _ume
1b
U
25
35 0
5
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.95 0.95
0.95
0.95 0.95
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
15
0
26
36 0
5
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0 0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Median Storage
1
Flared Approach: .
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
0 1
1
1 1
1
Configuration
LT
R
L T
R
Delay,
Queue
Length,
and Level
of Service
Approach
NB
SB
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement
1
4
1 7
8
9 1 10
11 12
Lane Config
L
L
I LT
R 1 L
T R
v (vph)
10
31
15
26
36
0
5
C(m) (vph)
682
368
75
307
122
76
515
v/c
0.01
0.08
0.20
0.08
0.30
0.00
0.01
95% queue length
0.04
0.27
0.69
0.28
1.14
0.00
0.03
Control Delay
10.4
15.7
64.6
17.8
46.4
52.4
12.1
LOS
B
C
F
C
E
F
B
Approach Delay
34.9
42.2
Approach LOS
D
E
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
is.
K
\1
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capacity
_Intersection Performance Summary_
Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Flow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Approach
Delay LOS
t;as:.Douna
L 350
1296
0.25
0.27
29.0
C
TR 419
1613
0.11
0.26
28.3
C
28.8
C
Westbound
LT 381
1464
0.14
0.26
28.6
C
20.1
C
R 712
1583
0.36
0.45
18.3
B
Northbound
L 344
1770
0.05
0.57
10.0+
B
T 1734
3539
0.75
0.49
19.0
B
18.7
B
R 776
1583
0.07
0.49
13.7
B
Southbound
L 382
1770
0.85
0.64
43.6
D
T 2017
3539
0.71
0.57
11.2
B
17.0
B
R 902
1583
0.05
0.57
9.6
A
Intersection
Delay
= 18.3
(sec/veh) Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16/01
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent shor long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Analyst:
Michael
Inter.:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
ency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
lte:
2/16/01
Jurisd:
Fort Coll' s
Period:
am pm
Year
recent hort long bkgrd total
Project
ID 106
E/W St:
Fossil Creek/Cameron
N/S St:
College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
► Eastbound
► Westbound
► Northbound
I Southbound 1
► L
I
T R
► L T
R
I L
T
R
I L T
R 1
No. Lanes
1 1
1 0
I
1 0 1
1
I
I 1
2
1
I
I 1 2
I
1 1
LGConfig
I L
TR
I LT
R
I L
T
R►
L T
R►
Volume
185
5 40
140 10
240
115
1230
55
1310 1365
45 I
Lane Width
112.0
12.0
► 12.0
12.0
112.0
12.0
12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0 ►
RTOR Vol
I
0
I
0
I
0
I
0 I
Duration
0.25
Area
Type: All
other
areas
Signal
Operations
Phase Combination
1 2
3 4►
5
6
7 8
EB Left
A
► NB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
►
Thru
P
Right
A
1
Right
P
Peds
X
1
Peds
X
WB Left
A
1 SB
Left
A
A
P
Thru
A
(
Thru
A
P
Right
A
►
Right
A
P
Peds
X
1
Peds
X
NB Right
1 EB
Right
SB Right
1 WB
Right
A
A
Green
26.0
6.0
8.0
49.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle Length:
100.0
secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
ryas �_Qouna
L 383
1277
0.10
TR 487
1679
0.07
Westbound
LT 406
1401
0.16
R 633
1583
0.53
Northbound
L 434
1770
0.07
T 1911
3539
0.72
R 855
1583
0.05
Southbound
L 260
1770
0.67
T 1911
3539
0.42
R 855
1583
0.08
Intersection
Delay
= 15.1
0.30 25.3 C
0.29 25.8 C 25.5 C
0.29
26.6
C 24.2
C
0.40
23.7
C
0.61
8.3
A
0.54
14.5
B 14.3
B
0.54
11.0
B
0.61
20.6
C
0.54
10.3
B 12.1
B
0.54
11.2
B
(sec/veh) Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970j 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16/01
Analysis Time Period: air pm
Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
n
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Analyst: Michael
Tency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
_ate: Tb 6/01
Period::(
eriod: am pm
Project 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year : recent OEKlong bkgrd total
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_
► Eastbound ► Westbound ► Northbound
I L T R I L T R I L T R
I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 0 ► 0 1 1 ► 1 2 1
LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L T R
Volume 135 10 20 155 5 320 130 1310 40
Lane Width 1"12.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol ► 0 I 0 1 0
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination
EB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
WB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
NB Right.
SB Right
Green
Yellow
All Red
I Southbound
L T R
I
I 1 2 1
I L T R
1165 765 65
112.0 12.0 12.0
1 0
Area
Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
1 2
3 4►
5
6 7 8
A
I NB Left
A
P
A
I Thru
P
A
I Right
P
X
I Peds
X
A
I SB Left
A
P
A
I Thru
P
A
I Right
P
X
I Peds
X
► EB Right
WB Right
A
29.0
6.0
54.0
3.0
0.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0 secs
APPENDIX C
Intersection Performance Summary__
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
e Group Flow Rate
Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 379
1149
0.53
T 627
1900
0.03
R 533
1615
0.12
Westbound
L 468
1419
0.22
TR 542
1641
0.32
Northbound
L 275
1805
0.19
TR 2319
5154
0.81
Southbound
L 275
1805
0.38
TR 2312
5138
0.91
Intersection Delay = 28.8
Approach
Delay LOS
0.33
28.6
C
0.33
22.7
C
27.1
C
0.33
23.5
C
0.33
24.5
C
0.33
25.4
C
25.1
C
0.57
18.5
B
0.45
27.0
C
26.8
C
0.57
17.6
B
0.45
32.1
C
31.4
C
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = C
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst:
Agency/Co.:
Date Performed:
Analysis Time Period:
Intersection:
Area Type:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID: 0106
fairway
matt
mjdpe
12/17/01
am ��
college/fairway
All other areas
fort Collins
20
East/West Street
�4t-dl� C-1
North/South Street
college
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Analyst: matt Inter.: college/fairway
Agency: mjdpe Area Type: All other areas
Date: 12/17/01 Jurisd: fort collins
Period:. am P Year
Project ID: 0106 r
E/W St: fairway N/S St: college
I Eastbound
I L T R
I
No. Lanes I 1
LGConfig I L
Volume 1190
Lane Width 112.0
RTOR Vol I
Duration 0.25
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
L T R I .L T R I L T R I
1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 I
T R I L TR I L TR I L TR I
15 60 1100 15 150 150 1710 75 I100 1865 125 I
12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 i
Phase Combination
1
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
SB Right
Green
33.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
I NB Left A P
I Thru P
I Right P
I Peds X
I SB Left A P
I Thru P
I Right P
I Peds X
EB Right
WB Right
12.0 45.0
3.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
zngr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
ie Group Flow Rate
urn Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 322
1288
0.28
T 475
1900
0.02
R 404
1615
0.08
Westbound
L 357
1426
0.12
TR 411
1642
0.28
Northbound
L 346
1805
0.15
TR 2728
5148
0.77
Southbound
L 275
1805
0.38
TR 2708
5110
0.47
Intersection Delay = 19.3
0.25
30.7
C
0.25
28.3
C
30.0
C
0.25
28.8
C
0.25
29.1
C
0.25
30.6
C
30.2
C
0.65
8.1
A
0.53
20.8
C
20.4
C
0.65
15.7
B
0.53
15.3
B
15.3
B
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst:
Agency/Co.:
Date Performed:
Analysis Time Period:
Intersection:
Area Type:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID: 0106
fairway
matt
mjdpe
12/17/01
5111ege/f
pm
airway
All other areas
fort collins
East/West Street
North/South Street
college
Appr/
Lane
Lane
Group
Grp
Capacity
Eastbound .
L
344
TR
389
Westbound
_Intersection Performance Summary_
Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Flow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
1322 0.22
1621 0.10
LT 334
1391
0.17
R 712
1583
0.41
Northbound
L 380
1770
0.01
TR 247.6
5054
0.66
Southbound
L 429
1770
0.87
TR 2995
5076
0.59
Intersection Delay = 16.2
Approach
Delay LOS
0.26 29.3 C
0.24 29.7 C 29.4 C
0.24
30.4
C 20.8
C
0.45
18.9
B
0.59
8.4
A
0.49
16.5
B 16.5
B
0.67
45.1
D
0.59
8.0
A 14.5
B
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16 01
Analysis Time Period: a pm
Intersection: Co ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael
,ency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
.te: 2/16/01
Period: .am�
Project ID: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year : recent short 4ong bkgrd total
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
{ Eastbound
I Westbound
{ Northbound
{ L T R
I L T R
I L T R
No. Lanes
I
I
I
I 0 1 1
i 1 3 0
I 1 1 0
LGConfig
I L TR
{ LT R
{ L TR
Volume
170 5 30
150 5 275
15 1495 65
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
1 12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol
I 0
I 0
I 0
I Southbound
L T R {
I I
1 3 0 {
{ L TR 1
1355 1665 20 1
112.0 12.0 {
1 0 I
Duration 0.25
Area Type: All other
areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination
1
2 3 4 1
5
6
7 8
EB Left
A
I NB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
WB Left
A.
i SB
Left
A
A
P
Thru
A
{
Thru
A
P
Right
A
I
Right
A
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
NB Right
I EB
Right
SB Right
I WB
Right
A
A
Green
24.0
6.0
10.0
49.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance
Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane
Group
Approach
Lane Group
Flow Rate
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C
Delay
LOS
Delay
LOS
Eastbound
L 413
1291
0.03
0.32
23.3
C
TR 518
1671
0.03
0.31
24.1
C
23.8
C
Westbound
LT 435
1402
0.17
0.31
25.3
C
21.9
C
R 697
1583
0.53
0.44
21.2
C
Northbound
L 384
1770
0.07
0.59
9.1
A
TR 253.0
5060
0.69
0.50
16.1
B
16.0
B
Southbound
L 269
1770
0.72
0.59
30.0
C
TR 2521
5042
0.41
0.50
12.5
B
15.3
B
Intersection
Delay
= 16.6
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16/01
Analysis Time Period: ':!g)pm
Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael
-ency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
.ate: 2/16/01
Period: ®pm
Project tD: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
I Eastbound
I L T R
I
No. Lanes I 1 1
LGConfig i L TR
Volume 110 5
Lane Width 1.12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol I
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination
1
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
SB Right
Green
31.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
0
10
Co;
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year recent short lon bkgr total
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound I Northbound
I L T R I L T R
I 0 1 1 I 1 3 0
I LT R I L TR
165 5 350 125 1595 55
I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
I 0 1 0
Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations_
2 3 4 i
I NB Left
I Thru
I Right
1 Peds
SB Left
I Thru
I Right
I Peds
I EB Right
WB Right
Southbound
L T R
I
I 1 3 0
I L TR
1185 925 55
112.0 12.0
1 0
5 6
7
8
A P
P
P
X
A P
_.. p
P
k
A
8.0 50.0
0.0 4.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0
secs
APPENDIX B
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: matt
Agency/Co.: mjdpe
Date Performed: 12/17 01
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: college/fairway
Jurisdiction: fort collies
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2005 2020 bakgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: fairway lane
North/South Street: college
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs)• 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
10
1500
15
30
1615
25
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
10
1578
15
31
1700
26
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
--
--
0
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1
2 1
1
2 1
Configuration
L
T R
L
T R
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement
7
8
9 1
10
11
12
L
T
R I
L
T
R
7olume
35
0
40
25
0
25
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
36
0
42
26
0
26
?ercent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
0
?ercent Grade (%)
0
0
'Median Storage 1
?lared Approach: Exists?
Storage
2T Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
0
1 1
1
1 1
Configuration
LT
R
L
T R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Ipproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
pane Config L L I LT R I L T R
(vph)
10
31
36
42
26
0
26
C(m) (vph)
371
417
74
338
61
62
308
7/c
0.03
0.07
0.49
0.12
0.43
0.00
0.08
35% queue length
0.08
0.24
2.00
0.42
1.63
0.00
0.27
:ontrol Delay
15.0-
14.3
93.0
17.2
102.2
63.1
17.8
SOS
B
B
F
C
F
F
C
iproach Delay
52.2
60.0
approach LOS
F
F
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a
Intersection Performance Summary_
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 365
1353
0.20
TR 421
1621
0.09
Westbound
LT 374
1439
0.13
R 712
1583
0.36
Northbound
L 367
1770
0.01
T 1734
3539
0.74
R 776
1583
0.07
Southbound
L 385
1770
0.85
T 2017
3539
0.71
R 902
1583
0.02
Intersection
Delay=
18.1
0.27 28.5 C
0.26 28.1 C
Approach
Delay LOS
28.3 C
0.26
28.5
C 19.9
B
0.45
18.3
B
0.57
9.7
A
0.49
18.8
B 18.6
B
0.49
13.7
B
0.64
42.1
D
0.57
11.2
B 16.8
B
0.57
9.4
A
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16/01
Analysis Time Period:
Intersection: o ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short long <EEd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst:
Michael
Inter.:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
sncy:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
_-te:
2/16/01
Jurisd:
Fort CollLas
Period:
am m
Year
recent short long bkgrd total
Project
ID: 0106
E/W St:
Fossil Creek/Cameron
N/S St:
College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound i
I L
T R
I L T
R
I L
T
R
I, L T
R 1
No. Lanes
I 1
1 0
I 0 1
1
I 1
2
1
I 1 2
1 I
LGConfig
I L
TR
I LT
R
I L
T
R
I L T
R 1
Volume
170
5 30
140 5
240
15
1220
55
1310 1360
20 1
Lane Width
112.0
12.0
1 12.0
12.0
112.0
12.0
12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0 1
RTOR Vol
I
0
I
0
1
0
1
0 1
Duration
0.25
Area
Type: All
other
areas
Signal
Operations
Phase Combination
1 2
3 4
1
5
6
7 8
EB Left
A
i NB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
i
Thru
P
Right
A
1
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
WB Left
A
i SB
Left
A
A
P
Thru
A
1
Thru
A
P
Right
A
1
Right
A
P
Peds
X
1
Peds
X
NB Right
I EB
Right.
SB Right
-
1 WB
Right
A
A
Green
26.0
6.0
8.0
49.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle Length:
100.0
secs
Appr/
Lane
Lane
Group
Grp
Capacity
Eastbound
L
396
TR
485
Westbound
_Intersection Performance Summary_
Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Flow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Approach
Delay LOS
1321 0.03 0.30 24.7 C
1671 0.03 0.29 25.5 C 25.2 C
LT
412
1421
0.15
R
633
1583
0.53
Northbound
L
437
1770
0.06
T
191.1
3539
0.72
R
855
1583
0.05
Southbound
L
261
1770
0.64
T
1911
3539
0.42
R
855
1583
0.07
Intersection
Delay
= 14.8
0.29
26.5
C 24.2
C
0.40
23.7
C
0.61
8.2
A
0.54
14.5
B 14.3
B
0.54
11.0
B
0.61
19.2
B
0.54
10.2
B 11.7
B
0.54
11.1
B
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2 16/01
Analysis Time Period: am m
Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Col s
Analysis Year: recent hort long bkgr total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
'-alyst: Michael
ancy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date: 2/16/01
Period: am pm
Project ID: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
Eastbound
L T R
I
No. Lanes I 1 1 0
LGConfig I L TR
Volume I10 5 10
Lane Width ►12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year : recent <fEi>long kgr total
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Westbound
I Northbound
i Southbound I
L T R
I L T
R
► L T
I
R I
I
i
I
I 1 2
1 1
— 1 0 1 1
1 1 2
1
I LT . R
I L T
R
I L T
R 1
155 5 320
125 1305
40
1160 755
55 1
► 12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0 1
0,
1
0
1
0 1
Duration 0.25
Area
Type: All other
areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination
1 2
3 4 1
5
6 7 8
EB Left
A
I NB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
►
Right
P
Peds
X
i
Peds
X
T•*8 Left
A
I SB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
►
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
NB Right
I EB
Right
SB Right
I WB
Right
A
Green
29.0
6.0
54.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
4.0
All Red.
2.0
0..0
2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0
secs
APPENDIX A
�I!
Cameron
Fairway
- Denotes Lane
Fossil Creek
4
N
LONG RANGE (2020) GEOMETRY Figure 9
Cameron
U)
O
O rn O
ch O
0 0 0
N O
f
100/150
♦-10/15
40/100
105/200
1
10/15 —�
30/60
O
�
ti
Co
�
L
JI
10/5
35185
10/5
20/40
350/275
�-- 5/10
65/50
r
LO 0 U')
r— O O
M o `n
O
co
Fairway
�— AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Fossil Creek
LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL Figure 8
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Jill
Cameron
d
0)
a�
0
Fairway
-ow- - Denotes Lane
Fossil Creek
A
N
SHORT RANGE (2005) GEOMETRY
Figure 7
TABLE
Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Operation
iz
zT,
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
(signal)
OVERALL
B
B
WB LT/T
F
F
WB RT
C
C
WB APPROACH
D
F
EB LT
E
F
College/Fairway
(stop sign)
EB T
F
F
EB RT
B
C
EB APPROACH
E
F
NB LT
B
C
SB LT
C
B
College/RT-in/RT-out
(stop sign)
EB RT
A
I
A
I
TABLE 6
Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation
fix'
MOM
ARF
Wa
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
OVERALL
B
B
(signal)
College/Fairway
OVERALL
B
C
(signal)
College/RT-in/RT-out
t
(stop sign)
EB RT
A
I
A
35/35
0/0 —�
5/25
LO O
CO
CD
JI
10/5
M o
U e- M
L
co CD
co rl- r-
f 1
m
d
o
25/40
�- 0/0
15/35
320/240
5/10
55/40
Cameron
35/85
10/5 -
20/40
,n
o
o
N
Lo
o
Cl)
o
IV
cM
e-
Fairway
AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Fossil Creek
N
SHORT RANGE (2005) TOTAL Figure 6
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
TABLE
Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Operation
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
(signal)
OVERALL
B
B
WB LTIT
F
F
WB RT
C
C
WB APPROACH
D
F
EB LT
E
F
College/Fairway
(stop sign)
EB T
E
F
EB RT
B
C
EB APPROACH
D
F
NB LT-
B
B
SB LT
C
B
TABLE 3
Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation
4, 4
MAM
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
(signal)
OVERALL
B
B
College/Fairway
(signal)
OVERALL
B
C
Cameron
CO
Lf) O O
o a) o
N O O
f 1
85/190
10/15 —�
30/60
a�
a�
0
U
100/150
10/15
40/100
r
0 0 un
LO`'C
o O
U*) c o
o)
0
LO
c0
o
to
c`i
350/275
N
`r) 0'
�
`-
�— 5/5
65/50
10170
1 f
5/5
10/30
to to U")
N
to
0)
LO
e-
Fairway
--w-- AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Fossil Creek
N
LONG RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND Figure 5
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Cameron
LO O
IT o
v- jO M
1
25/40
0/0
15/35
15/25
1
T
0/0
5/25
O
�
o
LO
o
CO
rn
LO
0
cfl o
M
N M
LO a co
JA ,-
i 1
10170 --�
5/5 —+�-
10/30
320/240
--aff— 5/5
55/40
f r
cO o LO
LON LO
N
N Lo O�
O
co
e-
Fairway
• AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Fossil Creek
SHORT RANGE (2005) BACKGROUND
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 4
m
m
0
U
Lo
Fairway
20/9 11
0
N
M
� 1
' 11l5
� .Site
N
\ / � N
/ 0/1
1 /2
Cameron / Fossil Creek
23/16 —1
2/1 —�
1018 U',
--a— AMAPM
4.
N
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Figure 3
TABLE I
Trip Generation
North Area
220
Apartments
72 D.U.
1 6.63
1 477
10.08
1 6
10.431
31
10.42
1 30
10.20
14
South Area
220
Apartments —T-78
D.U.
6.63
517
0.08
6
0.43
34
10.42
33
0.20
16
710
Office
7.2 KSF
11.01
79
1.37
10
0.19
1
0.25_
2
Subtotal
596
16
35
35
25
Total
11
1073
22
66
N
N
N
L
i
m
N
O
U
Harmon
Redtail rDP
T
(6
E
N
J
Cameronco
Al
co
N
D
Trilby
SCALE: 1"=2000'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
operation using the traffic forecasts shown in Figure 6. Calculation forms
are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections will operate similarly
to that shown with the background traffic. Figure 7 shows the short range
geometry at the key intersections.
Figure 8 shows the long range (2020) total peak hour traffic at the
key intersections. Table 5 shows the long range peak hour operation using
the traffic forecasts shown in Figure 8. Calculation forms are provided
in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably. Figure 9
shows the long range geometry at the key intersections.
In the staff comments, reference was made to the proximity of the
Cameron/Frontage Road intersection to College Avenue. This is an existing
situation. The close proximity does cause operational concerns regarding
blockage of the Frontage Road by eastbound traffic on Cameron Drive
approaching College. Avenue. This situation exists elsewhere in Fort
Collins. It is recommended that signs be placed stating "DO NOT"BLOCK
INTERSECTION.' Elimination of the Frontage Road does not appear to be an
option. The site plan for the Cameron Office Park shows a parking lot
connection between Cameron Drive and Coronado Court. This connection
provides an option of not using the Frontage Road by some of the traffic.
A comment was made regarding the consistency of traffic forecasts
with those in the "South College Avenue Access Control Plan." ' When
Kathleen Reavis was contacted in early 2001 regarding this document, she
provided information regarding the access points, but no information with
regard to traffic forecasts. Therefore, Mark Jackson was contacted to get
traffic forecasts. The peak hour forecasts in the transportation impact
study are consistent with those supplied by Mark Jackson.
Two additional pedestrian destinations were requested by Kathleen
Reavis. These are the Mason Street Corridor (park/ride station) and the
Werner Elementary School (east of College Avenue). Appendix E contains a
pedestrian level of service worksheet showing these two destinations. The
Mason Street Corridor will meet acceptable pedestrian level of service
criteria once the sidewalk system is built within Redtail and once the City
makes the necessary improvements related to the Mason Street Corridor
park/ride station. The pedestrian level of service cannot meet the minimum
criteria for all factors for the Werner Elementary School. 'This is
primarily due to street crossings and continuity. There are no sidewalks
in the Fossil Creek residential area east of College Avenue. This is a
county subdivision and sidewalks were not required, nor are they desired
by the residents. There is little that can be done to improve this.
Currently, bicycles use the shoulders along College Avenue as bike
lanes. Generally, this is considered to be safe for the few bicyclists
that use College Avenue. Where there are striped acceleration or
deceleration lanes on College Avenue, the bicyclists share this area with
the motor vehicles. Since the bicycle traffic is low, this situation is
generally acceptable. When College Avenue is restriped to be a six -lane
facility, it is recommended that bicycles not be allowed to use College
Avenue. This recommendation is consistent with the "no bike" policy on
College Avenue north of Harmony Road.
co
cr).
L
Co
co
0
CC
O
O
U
0
Z
J
w
O
J
w
C:
w
a
2
z
w
�Jn
V
N
t`
N
N
Ld
a
7
r=
Nr
co
0
LO
6
0
W
6
Q)
LL.
I
VL
0
N
co
0
rn
Li
z
O
a
0
Z
cc
W
Z
Z5
Z
W
Z
O
Q
0
a
U)
Z
a
H
cd
U
U.
LL
Q
Q
H
I Y1 �1Y . � ♦�� ��Y
TO: Jon Prouty,..Lagunitas Companies
Cathy Mathis, VF Ripley
City of Fort Collins
FROM: Matt Delich
DATE: December 18, 2001
eorP-100 RE(a�;S
4`G .0
152fi& =i .
SUBJECT: Redtail PDP Transportation Impact Study
(File: 0106ME01)
The Redtail PDP, located east of the College/Fossil Creek/
Cameron intersection, Figure 1, has been revised. Figure 2 shows the
new site plan. As indicated on Figure 2, access to the site has been
changed to include access to Fairway Lane to the north. In addition
to this, the proposed land uses have been changed. This addendum
addresses the staff comments contained in the Staff Project Review
dated August 28, 2001. Contact with Transportation Planning and
Traffic Operations indicated that a memorandum addressing the
comments and changes would be necessary.
The new site plan shows that most of Redtail has been changed
to residential land uses. Table 1 shows the new trip generation
estimate for Redtail. There will be a reduction in the trip
generation compared to the previous Redtail plan. The peak hour trip
generation will be reduced by 20-30 percent. In addition to this,
the site plan shows that access to a portion of the site will be via
the College/Fairway intersection. This will reduce the amounts",bf
traffic that will use the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection.
Figure 3 shows the assignment of the site generated traffic at the
key intersections.
Figures 4 and 5 show the short range (2005) and long range
(2020) background peak hour traffic at the key intersections. It is
expected that traffic signals would not be warranted at the College/
Fairway intersection in the short range future. However, as further
development occurs to the east and west, signals would likely be
warranted at this intersection. The College/Fairway intersection is
shown as a future signalized intersection on the "South College
Avenue Access Control Plan." The right-in/right-out access to
College Avenue is also shown on the "South College Avenue Access
Control Plan." Table 2 shows the operation of the key intersections
with the short range background peak hour traffic. Calculation forms
are .provided in Appendix A. The College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
intersection will operate acceptably. With the existing stop sign
control, the delays to the Fairway Lane legs of the College/Fairway
intersection will be commensurate with level of service D/E/F in the
peak hours. Table 3 shows the operation of the key intersections
with the long range background peak hour traffic. Calculation forms
are provided in Appendix B. With the warranted signalization, the
key intersections will operate acceptably.
Figure 6 shows the short range (2005) total peak hour traffic
at the key intersections. Table 4 shows the short range peak hour
FUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE
Travel Time Worksheet
54 11k�* P k
'SrONgAM
-ON
-CSU Campus Transit Center
4.8
18
37
2.1
-Foothills Fashion Mall
2.0
11
24
2.2
Fort Collins High School
3.9
16
37
2.3
Downtown Fort Collins
5.3
19
40
2.1
Total Travel Time
64
138
9
Service Level Standards Worksheet-
P
Hours of Weekday Service
Weekday Frequency of Service
—1-11 —
2of4=LOSD
N._.tltimodal Transportation Level of Se, vice Manual
I_OS Suindards for Development Review - Bicycle
Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet
level of service - connectivity
nutinnan actual proposed
base connectivity: C n C
specific connections to priority sites:
description of applicable
destination area within 1,320'
including address
destination area
classification
(see text)
P. 20
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
Project Location Classification: Transit Corridor & Other
—I
Offices adjacent to the
site (Fossil Creek Office
Park)
Office
Minimum
B
B
B
C
B
Actual
A
D
A
B
C
Proposed
A
D
A
B
C
Commercial uses north
of the site
Commercial
Minimum
B
B
B
C
B
E 2
Actual
A
D
A
B
C
Proposed
A
B
A
B
C
—3
Commercialloffice uses
northeast of the site
Commercial/
Office
Minimum
8
B
B
C
B
F
Actual
B
D
C
B
C
Proposed
B
D
C
B
C
Residential area east of
the site (Fossil Creek)
Residential
Minimum
B
B
B
C
B
ET
Actual
A
D
C
B
C
Proposed
A
D
C
B
C
Fairway Estates
Residential
Minimum
B
B
B
C
B
E-5
Actual
B
D
C
B
C
Proposed
B
D
C
B
C
Minimum
r 6
Actual
Proposed
Minimum
ET
Actual
Proposed
Minimum
E-8
Actual
Proposed
_9
Minimum
F
Actual
Proposed
Minimum
10
Actual
Proposed
PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA
APPENDIX G
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst:
Agency/Co.:
Date Performed:
Analysis Time Period:
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street:
North/South Street:
Michael
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2/22/01
am
Co ege/RT-in/RT-out
Fort Col ns
short on total
RT-in/RT-out
College
Intersection Orientation: NS
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
1370 20
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
1442 21
Percent Heavy Vehicles -- --
-- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
2 0
Configuration
T TR
Upstream Signal? No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement
7 8 9
1 10 11
12
L T R
I L T
R
Volume
15
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
15
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
No
Lanes
1
Configuration
R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config 1 I R
v (vph)
15
C(m) (vph)
807
v/c
0.02
95% queue length
0.06
Control Delay
9.5
LOS
A
Approach Delay
9.5
Approach LOS
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst:
Agency/Co.:
' ' Performed:
,ysis Time Period
Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street:
North/South Street:
Michael
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2/22/01
am m
ollege/RT-in/RT-out
Fort Collins_
short <Gtotal
RT-in/RT-out
College
Intersection Orientation: NS
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6-
L T R I L T R
Volume
760 80
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
800 84
Percent Heavy Vehicles -- --
-- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
2 0
Configuration
T TR
Upstream Signal? No
No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
me
Ptax Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
N
9
5
0.95
5
2
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12
Lane Config I I R
v (vph) 5
C (m) (vph) 912
v/c
35% queue length 0.0
0.02
Control Delay 9.0
10
Approach Delay A
kpproach LOS 9.0
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1
.Matthew J. Delich
4atthew J. Delich, P.E.
Intersection Performance Summary_
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 336
1292
0.41
TR 393
1636
0.15
Westbound
LT 336
1400
0.19
R 712
1583
0.41
Northbound
L 377
1770
0.07
TR 2476
5054
0.66
Southbound
L 429
1770
0.87.
TR 2991
5070
0.60
Intersection Delay = 16.5
0.26 31.4 C
0.24 30.1 C
0.24
30.5 C
0.45
18.9 B
0.59
8.6 A
0.49
16.5 B
Approach
Delay LOS
31.0 C
21.0 C
16.4 B
0.67 45.1 D
0.59 8.2 A 14.5 B
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16 01
Analysis Time Period: am
Intersection: Col ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins '
analysis Year: recent short long kgr total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael
ArTency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E
2/16/01
P.iiod: am
Project ID: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
1 Eastbound
I L T R
I
No. Lanes 1 1
LGConfig I L
Volume 1130
Lane Width 112.0
RTOR Vol I
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination
B Left
Thru
Right
Peds
KB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
VB Right
3B Right
3reen
fellow
�11 Red
1 0
TR
10 45
12.0
0
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collinsong
Year : recent short kgr total
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound 1
I L T
R
I L T R
I L T R I
I 0 1
1
1 1 3 0
1 1 3 0 I
I LT
R
I L TR
( L TR 1
150 10
275
125 1495 65
1355 .1680 35 1
I 12.0
12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 I
I
0
1 0
1 0 1
Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
1
2 3 4 1
5
6
7 8
A
I NB Left
A
P
A
I Thru
P
A
I Right
P
X
I Peds
X
A
I SB Left
A
A
P
A
I Thru
A
P
A
I Right
A
P
X
I Peds
g
1 EB Right
I WB Right
A
A
24.0
6.0
10.0
49.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection
Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane
Group
Approach
Lane Group
Flow Rate
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C
Delay
LOS
Delay
LOS
Eastbound
L 406
1269
0.10
0.32
24.0
C
TR 516
1666
0.07
0.31
24.4
C
24.2
C
Westbound
LT 435
1403
0.18
0.31
25.4
C
21.9
C
R 697
1583
0.53
0.44
21.2
C
Northbound
L 390
1770
0.14
0.59
9.3
A
TR 2530
5060
0.69
0.50
16.1
B
15.9
B
Southbound
L 269
1770
0.72
0.59
30.0
C
TR 2531
5061
0.40
0.50
12.4
B
15.3
B
Intersection Delay = 16.7
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 21 6/01
Analysis Time Period: m pm
Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short <aDbkgrd tota
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael
P^ency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
e: 2/16/01
P=riod: am m
Project ID: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
1 Eastbound
I L T R
I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0
LGConfig i L TR
Volume 140 10 25
Lane Width 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1- 0
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination 1
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
SB Right
Green
31.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year : recent short lon bkgrd total
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound I Northbound
I L T R I L T R
I I
I 0 1 1 1 1 3 0
I LT R I L TR
165 10 350 150 1595 55
I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
I 0 I 0
Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations-
2 3 4 1
NB Left
I Thru
I Right
I Peds
I SB Left
I Thru
I Right
I Peds
I EB Right
I WB Right
1 Southbound
I L T R
I
I 1 3 0
I L TR
1185 930 30
112.0 12.0
1 0
5 6
7 8
A P
P
P
X
A P
P
P
X
A
8.0 50.0
0.0 4.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0
secs
APPENDIX F
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
-Date-.2erformed: 2/2221
Analysis Time Period: am m
Intersection: College/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: hort long otal
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street: RT-in/RT-out
North/South Street: College
Intersection Orientation: NS
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
1705
20
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.95
0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
1794
21
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
No
Lanes
2 1
Configuration
T R
Upstream Signal? No
No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade ( `} ) 0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config I I R
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
9.9
A
751
0.02
0.06
9.9
A
Appr/
Lane
Lane
Group
Grp
Capacity
Eastbound
L
363
TR
425
Westbound
_Intersection Performance Summary_
Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Flow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Approach
Delay LOS
1346 0.38 0.27 30.3 C
1636 0.14 0.26 28.5 C 29.8 C
LT
378
1453
0.14
R
712
1583
0.36
Northbound
L
363
1770
0.07
T
1734
3539
0.74
R
776
1583
0.07
Southbound
L
385
1770
0.85
T
2017
3539
0.72
R
902
1583
0.04
Intersection
Delay
= 18.4
0.26
28.6
C 20.1
C
0.45
18.3
B
0.57
9.9
A
0.49
18.8
B 18.5
B
0.49
13.7
B
0.64
42.1
D
0.57
11.3
B 16.8
B
0.57
9.5
A
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, Co 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16/01
Analysis Time Period: am/im�
Intersection: Col ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Col ns
Analysis Year: recent shor long bkgrd tota
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron. College
HCS2000: Signalized•3ntersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 2/16/01 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: am q Year recent hort long bkgr total
-)ject ID: 0106
St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College
I Eastbound
I L T R
i
No. Lanes I 1 1 0
LGConfig I L TR
Volume I130 10 45
Lane Width 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination 1
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NR Right
Right
V een
26.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound
I L T
I
R
I L T
R
I L T
R
I
I
1
I 0 1
1
I 1 2
1
I 1 2
I LT
R
I L T
R
I L T
R
140 10
240
125, 1220
55
1310 1375
35
I 12.0
12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0
I
0
1
0
1
0
Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
2 3 4 1
I NB Left
I Thru
I Right
I Peds
1 SB Left
I Thru
I Right
I Peds
I EB Right
I WB Right
5
6 7 8
A
P
P
P
X
A
A P
A P
A P
X
A
A
6.0
8.0 49.0
0.0
0.0 4.0
0.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0 secs
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capacity
_Intersection Performance Summary_
Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Flow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 389
1297
0.11
TR 483
1666
0.08
Westbound
LT 413
1425
0.17
R 633
1583
0.53
Northbound
L 436
1770
0.12
T 1911
3539
0.72
R 855•
1583
0.05
Southbound
L 261
1770
0.64
T 1911
3539
0.42
R 855
1583
0.04
Intersection
Delay
= 15.0
0.30 25.4 C
0.29 25.8 C
Approach
Delay LOS
25.6 C
0.29
26.7
C 24.2
C
0.40
23.7
C
0.61
8.5
A
0.54
14.5
B 14.2
B
0.54
11.0
B
0.61
19.2
B
0.54
10.2
B 11.8
B
0.54
10.9
B
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16/01
Analysis Time Period: m pm
Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd tota
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael
-ncy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
e: 2/16/01
Period: pm
Project D: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
No. Lanes
LGConfig
Volume
Lane.Width
RTOR Vol
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year : recent short long bkgrd total
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
SUMMARY
Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound j
L T R
I L T R
I L
T R
I L T
R
I 1 1 0
I
1 0 1 1
I
I 1
2 1
I
1 1 2
I
1
I L TR
I LT R
I L
T R
I L T
R i
140 10 25
155 10 320
150
1305 40
1160 760
30 I
112.0 12.0
I 12.0 12.0
112.0
12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0.12.0
I
1' 0
I 0
1
0
1
0 I
Duration 0.25
Area Type: All
Signal
Phase Combination
1
2 3
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
SB Right
Green
29.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
other areas
Operations_
4 I
NB Left
I Thru
I Right
I Peds
I SB Left
I Thru
1 Right
I Peds
1 EB Right
I WB Right
5 6
7 8
A P
P
P
X
A P
P
P
X
A
6.0 54.0
0.0 4.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0
secs
APPENDIX E
_
Intersection
Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane
Group
Approach
Lane Group
Flow Rate
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C
Delay
LOS
Delay
LOS
Eastbound
L 344
1322
0.22
0.26
29.3
C
TR 389
1621
0.10
0.24
29.7
C
29.4
C
Westbound
LT 334
1391
0.17
0.24
30.4
C
20.8
C
R 712
1583
0.41
0.45
18.9
B
Northbound
L 380
1770
0.01
0.59
8.4
A
TR 2476
5054
0.66
0.49
16.5
B
16.5
B
Southbound
L 429
1770
0.87
0.67
45.1
D
TR 2995
5076
0.59
0.59
8.0
A
14.5
B
Intersection Delay = 16.2
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
?hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16 1
Analysis Time Period: am
pm
Intersection: Co ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Irea Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short long bkard total
Oroject ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst:
Michael
Inter.:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
P -ncy:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
e:
2/16/01
Jurisd:
Fort Collins
Period:
am
Year
recent short ong bkgrd total
Project
ID: 0106
E/W St:
Fossil Creek/Cameron
N/S St:
College
I Eastbound
I L T R
I
No. Lanes 1 1 1
LGConfig I L TR
Volume. 170 5
Lane Width 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol I
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination
1
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
SB Right
Green
24.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
51
30
N
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Westbound I Northbound
I L T R I L T R
I I
I 0 1 1 I 1 3 0
I LT R I L TR
150 5 275 15 1495 65
I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
I 0 1 0
Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
2 3 4 1 5 6
I NB Left A
I Thru
f Right
Peds
SB Left
Thru
- Right
Peds.
EB Right
WB Right
A A
A
A
I Southbound
L T R
I 1 3 0
I L TR
1355 1665 20
112.0 12.0
1 0
7
P
P
P
X
P
P
P
X
A
A
6.0
10.0 49.0
0.0
0.0 4.0
0.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0
secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane
Group
Approach
Lane Group
Flow Rate
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C
Delay
LOS
_
Delay
LOS
Eastbound
L 413
1291
0.03
0.32
23.3
C
TR 518
1671
0.03
0.31
24.1
C
23.8
C
Westbound
LT 435
1402
0.17
0.31
25.3
C
21.9
C
R 697
1583
0.53
0.44
21.2
C
Northbound
L 384
1770
0.07
0.59
9.1
A
TR 2530
5060
0.69
0.50
16.1
B
16.0
B
Southbound
L 269
1770
0.72
0.59
30.0
C
TR 2521
5042
0.41
0.50
12.5
B
15.3
B
Intersection
Delay
= 16.6
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16/01
Analysis Time Period: �pm
Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael
Inter.:
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
P -ncy:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other
areas
e:
2/16/01
Jurisd:
Fort Collins
.
Period:
an pm
Year
recent short
lon bkgr total
Project
D• 0106
E/W St:
Fossil Creek/Cameron
N/S St:
College
Eastbound
L T R
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0
LGConfig ► L TR
Volume 110 5 10
Lane Width 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 11 0
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound ►
L T R I L T R I L T R ►
► 0 1 1 I 1 3 0 ► 1 3 0 I
1 LT R I L TR I L TR 1
165 5 350 125 1595 55 1185 925 55 1
1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 ►
I 0 1 0 1 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area
Phase Combination
1
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
SB Right
green
31.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
E
Type: All other areas
_Signal Operations
3 4 1
5
6 7 8
1 NB Left
A
P
Thru
P
I Right
P
I Peds
X
SB Left
A
P
1 Thru
P
► Right
P
► Peds
X
I EB Right
WB Right
A
8.0 50.0
0.0 4.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
APPENDIX D
Intersection Performance
Summary
Appr/
Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane
Group
Approach
Lane
Group
Flow Rate
Grp
Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C
Delay
LOS
Delay
LOS
Eastbound
L
365
1353
0.20
0.27
28.5
C
TR
421
1621
0.09
0.26
28.1
C
28.3
C
Westbound
LT
374
1439
0.13
0.26
28.5
C
19.9
B
R
712
1583
0.36
0.45
18.3
B
Northbound
L
367
1770
0.01
0.57
9.7
A
T
1734
3539
0.74
0.49
18.8
B
18.6
B
R
776
1583
0.07
0.49
13.7
B
Southbound
L
385
1770
0.85
0.64
42.1
D
T
2017
3539
0.71
0.57
11.2
B
16.8
B
R
902
1583
0.02
0.57
9.4
A
Intersection
Delay
= 18.1
(sec/veh) Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16/01
Analysis Time Period:
Intersection: o ege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent hort long<gid total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS20O0: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
r-ency• Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
,e: 2/16/01 Jurisd: Fort Coll' s
Period: am m Year recent short long kgr total
Project ID: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION,SUMMARY
Eastbound I Westbound ► Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 0 I 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 I
LGConfig I L TR I LT R I L T R I L T R I
Volume 170 5 30 140 5 240 15 1220 55 1310 1360 20 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol I. 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1
Duration 0.25
Area Type: All
Signal
Phase Combination
1
2 3
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
SB Right
Green
26.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
other areas
Operations
4 1
5
6
7 8
NB Left
A
P
Thru
P
Right
P
Peds
X
I SB Left
A
A
P
Thru
A
P
Right
A
P
I Peds
X
EB Right
WB Right
A
A
6.0 8.0 49.0
0.0 0.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary_
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 396
1321
0.03
TR 485
1671
0.03
Westbound
LT 412
1421
0.15
R 633
1583
0.53
Northbound
L 437
1770
0.06
T 1911
3539
0.72
R 855-
1583
0.05
Southbound
L 261
1770
0.64
T 1911
3539
0.42
R 855
1583
0.07
Intersection
Delay
= 14.8
0.30 24.7 C
0.29 25.5 C
Approach
Delay LOS
25.2 C
0.29
26.5
C 24.2
C
0.40
23.7
C
0.61
8.2
A
0.54
14.5
B 14.3
B
0.54
11.0
B
0.61
19.2
B
0.54
10.2
B 11.7
B
0.54
11.1
B
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 34,16101
Analysis Time Period: am m
Intersection: ollege/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Analysis Year: recent OLDlong bkgr total
Project ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South.Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
A--ncy: Matthew J.
Delich,
P.E. Area Type: All other areas
1 s: 2/16/01
Period: am pm
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year recent or long <atotal
Project ID: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
i Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1
L
T R
i L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1
I
No. Lanes 1 1
I I I I
1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1
1 0
LGConfig 1 L
TR
1 LT R I L T R I L T R i
Volume 110
5 10
155 5 320 125 1305 40 1160 755 55 1
Lane Width 112..0
12.0
1, 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1
0
1 On 0 I 0 I
Duration 0.25
Area
Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination
1 2
3 4 1 5 6 7 8
El Left
A
i NB Left A P
Thru
A
1 Thru P
Right
A
I Right P
Peds
X
1 Peds X
WB Left
A
I SB Left A P
Thru
A
I Thru P
Right
A
I Right P
Peds
X
1 Peds X
NB Right
1 EB Right
SB Right
I. WB Right A
3reen
29.0
6.0 54.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0 4.0
All Red
2.0
0..0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
,AV
APPENDIX C
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Average Total
seclve6
nA
<10
>10and<
jDelay
> 15 and _<
D
> 25 and <
E
>35and<
F
> 50
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level -of -Service
Average Total Delay
seclveh
A
_< 10
B
>10and<20
C
>20and <35.
D
> 35 and _< 55
E
> 55 and _< g0
F
> 80
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael
' -ncy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
e: 2/16/01
Period: am,
Project ID: 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
Eastbound
( L T R
I
No. Lanes I 1 1 0
LGConfig I L TR
Volume 137 3 15
Lane Width (12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1' 0
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year recent short long bkgrd total
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Westbound ( Northbound
( L T R I L T R
I I
I 0 1 1 I 1 2 1
( LT R I L T R
130 2 49 12 1197 49
( 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0
( 0 ( 0
I Southbound
L T R
I I
( 1 2 1 I
( L T R I
179 1332 10 1
112.0 12.0 12.0 1
1 0 1
Duration 0.25
Area Type: All
other
areas
Signal
Operations
Phase Combination
1
2 3
4(
5
6 7 8
EB Left
A
I NB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
WB Left
A
I SB
Left
A
P
Thru
A
I
Thru
P
Right
A
I
Right
P
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
NB Right
( EB
Right
SB Right
I WB
Right
A
Green
12.0
14.0
105.0
Yellow
3.0
0.0
4.0
All Red
2.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle
Length: 142.0 secs
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capacity
Eastbound
L 110 1206 0.04
TR 134 1583 0.04
Westbound
LT 115 1365 0.35
R 346 1583 0.26
Vorthbound
L 666 1770 0.01
T 2617 3539 0.51
R 1171 1583 0.03
Southbound
L 470 1770 0.09
P 2617 3539 0.30
R 1171 1583 0.02
Intersection Delay = 4.2
_Intersection Performance Summary_
Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Flow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Approach
Delay LOS
0.09 58.9 E
0.08 59.9 E 59.5 E
0.08
63.1
E 51.5
D
0.22
46.4
D
0.85
1.8
A
0.74
1.2
A 1.3
A
0.74
5.0
A
0.85
2.0
A
0.74
0.7
A 0.9
A
0.74
4.9
A
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = A
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Hatthew J. Delich
:Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
?hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 2/16/01
Analysis Time Period: (9> pm
Intersection: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisdiction: FgxXCollins
Analysis Year: recent short long bkgrd total
9roject ID: 0106
East/West Street North/South Street
Fossil Creek/Cameron College
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1
Analyst: Michael
F icy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
L a: 2/16/01
Period. pm
Project D:. 0106
E/W St: Fossil Creek/Cameron
I Eastbound
L T R
I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0
LGConfig I L TR
Volume 14 0 6
Lane Width 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination
1
EB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
WB Left
A
Thru
A
Right
A
Peds
X
NB Right
SB Right
Green
12.0
Yellow
3.0
All Red
2.0
Inter.: College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year : <EE>short long bkgrd total
N/S St: College
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound
L T R
I L T
R
I L T
R
I
I
I
I 1 2
1
I 1 2
1
1 0 1 1
LT R
I L T
R
I L T
R
136 2 86
19 1277
37
142 739
24
1 12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0
1 0
1
0
1
0
Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations_
2 3 4 1
NB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
I SB Left
Thru
1 Right
1 Peds
1 EB Right
1 WB Right
5
6
7 8
A
P
P
P
X
A
P
P
P
X
A
14.0 105.0
0.G 4.0
0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 142.0 secs
APPENDIX B
R = right turn
S = straight
1 - I&* film
P.E.
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND, CO 80538
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 2.7.01 Observer: Michael
Day: Wednesday City: Fort Collins
Intersection: US2871Fossll CreeklCameron
Time
Northbound: US287
Southbound: US287
Total
Eastbound: Cameron
Westbound: Fossil Creek
Total
Total
L
S
R
Total
L
S
R
Total
L
S
R
Total
L
3
R
Total
Begins
north/south
east/west
All
7:30
0
281
8
U
12
175
3
` "' �� �'3
479
0
0
3"�Fi`
"
12
0
18
9Q :`
33
512'
,
7:45
1
332
3
5
187
53
513
1
0
1
8
1
26
36r ..
37
550
8:00
3
378
8
13
209
10dr�;
$S
619
0
0
1
r' `n r�y
2
0
27
29 ':
30
849
'.'d.:.-.
gym. . E.
R,w, 4..dn
8:15
5
288
18
f..•j
12
188
6�
517
3
0
1
Ik��ar``
14
1
15
•'� "N��`5°,{
7:30.8:30
'
1323
Y
805
2128';Q
F`�Yt
10
124
134
2262
PHIZM
0.85
0.81
0.63
0.89
4:30
1
283
13
1.
17
285
3
:t"A`
+
"5
582
8
1
4
,:r. •:.
`e%3e
11
1
19
.. .
31 : '_
44
826
t
,t.
.
4:45
1
321
10
' + h
25
342
5
.x3
r"`;
704
5
1
5
IM"1?�y
7
0
13
20'<.. `
31
735
5:00
0
325
15
a
20
373
1
734
15
1
3ti
7
1
9
11`
36
770
1.:.rr
���,4�?
5:15
0
288
11
a ,' `,
17
332
1
`illQ
k';;° !
649
9
0
3
z 1 "t
5
0
8
1�9 `,
25
674
:;
„°'I'�
_:
4:30.5:30�
1248
i,
;�'
1421
2669
F:;�
R;;�
;15 ?y
55
"�Qu`c
-
81
136
2805
PHF
0.92
019
0.72
0.65
APPENDIX A
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This study assessed the impacts of the Redtail PDP development on
the short range and long range street system in the vicinity of the
proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is
concluded:
The development of the Redtail PDP is feasible from a traffic
engineering standpoint. At full development, the Redtail PDP will
generate approximately 1134 daily trip ends, 128 morning peak hour
trip ends, and 138 afternoon peak hour trip ends.
Current operation at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection
is acceptable. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections
during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better.
It is expected that no additional traffic signals will be
warranted, due to the existing signal at the College/Fossil
Creek/Cameron intersection.
In the short range future, given full development of the Redtail
PDP and an increase in background traffic, the College/Fossil
Creek/Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out intersections will operate
acceptably. 11
In the long range future, given full development of the Redtail
PDP, the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out
intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. The
short range and long range geometry is shown in Figures 10 and 11,
respectively.
Acceptable level of service is achieved for bicycle and transit
modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation
guidelines. With regard to pedestrian level of service, gaps in
the sidewalk system should be filled in by adjacent property
owners.
21
commercial area north of the site, the commercial/office area
northeast of the site, and the residential area (Fossil Creek) east of
the site. This site is in an area type termed "transit corridor" and
"other." The level of service determination assumes that future
developments will build their streets in accordance with Fort Collins
Standards. This being the case, pedestrian facilities will exist
adjacent to vacant property. This is a reasonable assumption. The
sidewalk system in the area along Fossil Creek was never developed.
The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix G. The minimum
level of service for "transit corridor" is B for all categories,
except for the visual interest & amenities category where it is LOS C.
The minimum level of service for "other" is C for all measured
categories. The primary concern with regard to pedestrian level of
service is the discontinuity of the sidewalk system. Much of the area
was developed in Larimer County, and as such, sidewalks were neither
required nor built. It is incumbent upon the adjacent property owner
to build sidewalks where they do not currently exist.
Bicycle Level of Service
Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, .there are no
destination areas within 1320 feet of the Redtail PDP. The Bicycle LOS
Worksheet is provided in Appendix G, which indicates that the base
connectivity is acceptable at level of service C.
Transit Level of Service
Currently, there is limited transit service in the area. In the
future, transit service will be improved. In the future, there will
be 20 minute transit service on College Avenue. It is anticipated
that the level of service will be in the D category with
implementation of the City's Transit Development Plan. A future
transit level of service worksheet is provided in Appendix G.
20
Carr
:,reek
-a*-- - Denotes Lane
LONG RANGE (2020) GEOMETRY
Figure 11
19
Carr
m
CD
reek
so - Denotes Lane
SHORT RANGE (2005) GEOMETRY
Figure 10
18
TABLE 5
Short Range Total Peak Hour Operation
M
-et^ .4_
WWWWWOM ...
- F Ada " . t'"
✓
;h�^°aL. '.p MO.
q
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
OVERALL
B
B
(signal)
College/RT-in/RT-out
EB RT
A
A
(stop sign)
TABLE 6
Long Range Total Peak Hour Operation
IColllegle/Fossil.Cneek/Cameron I OVERALL I B I B(signaI
I oolleg /R -in/RT-out I EB RT I A I A(stsign)
I
17
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8 and the recommended
geometrics, the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out
intersections operate in the short range total condition as indicated
in Table 5. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in
Appendix E. The key intersections will operate acceptably.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9 and recommended
geometrics, the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out
intersections operate in the long range total condition as indicated
in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in
Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably.
The short range and long range geometry is shown in Figures 10 and
11, respectively. The existing cross section of College Avenue is wide
enough. to provide for 2 through lanes in each direction, a center median
for designated left -turn lanes, and a wide shoulder that is striped with
right -turn auxiliary lanes at appropriate locations. It is classified
as an NR-A Highway. Using the State Highway Access Code (1998) as the
reference, the right -turn auxiliary lanes should be 500 feet long
including a bay taper at 15:1. The left -turn lanes must also provide
for this same deceleration length plus the ability to store potential
left -turn queues. In the short range future, the northbound storage
length is 50 feet and the southbound storage length is 300 feet. A
northbound right -turn acceleration lane is required for traffic entering
College Avenue from westbound Fossil Creek Parkway. This lane already
exists and would not be the responsibility of the Redtail PDP. The
southbound storage length is required due to the forecasted traffic with
the connection of Fossil Creek Parkway between College Avenue and Lemay
Avenue. Once this connection is made, actual traffic counts should be
used to determine the southbound left -turn storage length. There is a
significant north to south decreasing grade on College Avenue north of
the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. Adjustments to the
deceleration length should be made, as appropriate. In the long range
future, the Fort Collins Master Street Plan indicates that College
Avenue has three through lanes in each direction. The right -turning
volumes are not high enough to require separate right -turn lanes at the
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron or College/RT-in/RT-out intersections with
the six -lane cross section. The left -turn storage lengths described
earlier are sufficient in the long range future. Since there is enough
width on Cameron Drive, it is recommended in both the short range and
long range futures that an eastbound left-turnlane and a through/right-
turn lane be striped on Cameron Drive. The westbound geometry on Fossil
Creek Parkway can remain as it exists currently.
Pedestrian Level of Service
Appendix G shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of
the Redtail PDP. There will be four pedestrian destinations within a
quarter mile of the Redtail PDP. These are the office area (Cameron
Park and Fossil -Creek Office Park) adjacent to the site, the
16
3
RangeTABLE
Short Background Peak Hour Operation
T�..�y�r
MENsdL d'
�
�• -' .
x'SSe
� , �fr
^ .,..
wY.. EGyw-y_u.iL.IL�1� �wfiR
s r
'+�3'd4'�F'tG�J .J•..L
y
Smi�..54�R+_t��
1 1 1 1
(signal)
TABLE 4
Long Range Background Peak Hour Operation
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron I OVERALL ( B. I B
(signal)
is
O
O N
O
O e�—
O
JI
RTAWRT-out 5/15
Cameron
O
co to
co Lo
to CO
MM
O m Goo
)M lO
f 1
40/130
10/10 —►
25/45
350/275
10/10
65/50
f r
LO u) LO
N O)Lo
(p
to
rn
LO
Ir-
AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Fossil Creek
A&
N
Figure 9
14
RT-in/RT-out
L0
O
ti
O �—
N U')
O �
O O
JI
5/15
Lo
f� O
(n
to \ cM
Cf O O (0 (D
c) [�-
f
Cameron
40/130
10/10 —'w-
25/45
m
0
U
320/240
f 10/10
55/40
,4*1 f r
U') O to
N N tr)
N
u1It
LO
ch
T-
AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
SHORT RANGE (2005) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Fossil Creek
N
Figure 8
13
Cameron
N
m
0
350/275
T— 5/5
65/50
10170 —
5/5 —
10/30
Fossil Creek
AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
LONG RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
46.
Figure 6
11
O
(O O
N
to
to co
)Uj 1p- T--`
f 1 i
Cameron
WO --)�
5/5
10/30
3201240
--M-- 5/5
1— 55/40
f r
Ln O Ul)
�j N U*)
N � O
Z�a V
O
M
e-
AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
SHORT RANGE (2005) BACKGROUND
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Fossil Creek
N
Figure 5
10
Background Traffic Projections
Figures 5 and 6 show the respective short range and long range
background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the
short range and long range future horizons were obtained by contacting
Fort Collins Transportation Planning Staff and reviewing the Huntington
Hills Apartments traffic study prepared for this area of Fort Collins.
The peak hour traffic was increased to reflect the connection of Fossil
Creek Parkway between College Avenue and Lemay Avenue. In addition,
there are five office buildings on Coronado Court that were approved a
number of years ago within the Fossil Creek Office Park, but have not
yet been built. The background traffic includes the generated traffic
from these yet unbuilt office buildings.
Trip Assignment
Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are
expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the
resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 7 shows the site
generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 8 shows the total (site
plus background) short range peak hour traffic at the key intersections.
Figure 9 shows the total long range morning and afternoon peak hour
traffic at the key intersections. It should be noted, due to the right-
in/right-out access to College Avenue, a portion of the existing Fossil
Creek Office Park traffic will utilize this access.
Signal Warrants
As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any
location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices. Signal warrant analyses were not required due
to the existing signal at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection.
Operation Analysis
Capacity analyses were performed at the College/Fossil Creek/
Cameron and College/RT-in/RT-out intersections. The operations analyses
were conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year 2005
condition. The long range analysis reflects a year 2020 condition.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5, the College/Fossil
Creek/Cameron intersection operates in the short range background
condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses
are. provided in Appendix C. The key intersection will operate
acceptably during the peak hours.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6, the College/Fossil
Creek/Cameron intersection operates in the long range background
condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses
are provided in Appendix D. The key intersection will operate
acceptably during the peak hours.
9
0
I Site
I I
ICameron
L__J aR
O
V)l
OFFICE
A
m
F
I _J
I Site
I
I I
Cameron
cn
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Fossil Creek
5%
--at --------- am -
RESIDENTIAL
Fossil Creek
N
N
Figure 4
8
m®r�i
N
CREEK
WAY
SITE PLAN Figure 3
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The Redtail PDP is an office and residential development, located
west of College Avenue near the existing Cameron Park and developing
Fossil Creek Office Parkin Fort Collins. Figure 3 shows a site plan of
the Redtail PDP. The site plan shows primary access via the
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. Right-in/right-out access is
also shown at a location approximately 725 feet north of the
College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection. This is the existing access
to the Mill Brothers Nursery property. This access is shown on the
adopted "South College Avenue Access Control Study/Plan," 1988. This
access is also shown on the "South College Avenue Access Control Plan
Update" which is currently going through the public review process.
The short range analysis (Year 2005) includes development of the Redtail
PDP' and an appropriate increase in background traffic. The long range
analysis year is considered to be 2020.
Trip Generation
Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a
development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A
compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation,
6`" Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by
the proposed/expected uses at this site. The proposal is for eight
office buildings of 7,000 square feet each, eight apartment buildings
with eight units in each, and two apartment buildings with seven units
in each. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak
hour basis.
Trip Distribution
Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for
the Redtail PDP based upon the distribution of the existing traffic
volumes and the location of trip productions for these types of land
uses. Figure 4 shows the trip distributions used for both the office
and residential uses.
6
Existing Operation
The College/Fossil Creek/Cameron intersection was evaluated using
techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. The peak hour
operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in
Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and
unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual is also
provided in Appendix B. The key intersection operates acceptably during
both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Acceptable operation at
signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of
service D or better. Experience indicates -that if level of service D
can be achieved during the peak hours, operation will be at level of
service C or better for 20-22 hours of an average weekday.
I TABLE
Current Peak Hour
Operation
I College/Fossil Creek/Cameron I OVERALL ( A I A I
(signal)
Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities in this area are sporadic. Sidewalks exist
in the developing Fossil Creek Office Park. Sidewalks also exist
adjacent to the commercial/office uses north and northeast of the
site. There are no sidewalks along Fossil Creek Parkway or on Cameron
Drive, within Cameron Park. This site is within 1320 feet of:
existing residential areas east of the site and existing
commercial/office uses east, north, and northeast of the site. While
there are residential uses to the west, within 1320 feet of this site,
they are not accessible due to the railroad tracks.
Bicycle Facilities
There are bicycle facilities along College Avenue. Along Fossil
Creek Parkway bike lanes are not striped, however there is sufficient
width for bicycles to operate safely. There are no bike lanes on
Cameron Drive, since it is a local street.
Transit Facilities
The Fox Trot is within 1320 feet of this site. It operates along
College Avenue from Harmony Road, south into Loveland. The Fox Trot
provides year-round service on 60 minute headways between 6:15am and
7:00pm.
5
0)
0
U
N
M
ch
IV M N
N r— IV
1
86/49
2/2
36/30
Cameron
4/37
0/3
6/15
N
rn
1--
°'
CD
v
ti
M
r-
N
AM/PM
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Fossil Creek
N
Figure 2
4
a
VT
I
N
N
m
' L
CD
m
N
O
U
Harmon
Redtail PIDP
1=
m
J
Cameron
°ss
ma
r
0
N
co
i
D
Trilby
SITE LOCATION
SCALE: V=2000'
Figure 1
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The location of the Redtail PDP is shown in Figure 1. It is
important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be
presented.
Land Use
Land uses in the area are primarily commercial/office and
residential. Commercial/office uses exist adjacent to the site, to the
north, and to the northeast across College Avenue. Residential uses
exist east of the site across College Avenue. The center of Fort
Collins lies to the north of the Redtail PDP.
Roads
The primary streets near the Redtail PDP site are College Avenue,
Fossil Creek Parkway, and Cameron Drive. College Avenue is to the east
of the Redtail PDP. It is a north -south street designated as an
arterial in the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. In this area, College
Avenue has a four -lane cross section with a center left -turn median and
right -turn auxiliary lanes. There are northbound/southbound left -turn
lanes and a northbound/southbound right -turn lanes on College Avenue,
approaching Fossil Creek Parkway and Cameron Drive. The existing speed
limit in this area is 50 mph. The College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
intersection has signal control
Fossil Creek Parkway is east of the Redtail PDP. It is an east -
west street designated as a collector on the Fort Collins Master Street
Plan. Currently, it is has a two-lane cross section with a wide raised
center median. The westbound approach to College Avenue has a left-
turn/through lane and a right -turn lane. Fossil Creek Parkway lines up
with Cameron Drive, which is west of College Avenue. By/before the
short range (2005) future, it is expected that Fossil Creek. Parkway will
be extended east, to Lemay Avenue.
Cameron Drive is west of the Redtail PDP and will serve as an
access to the site. Cameron Drive is an east -west street designated as
a local street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. In this area,
Cameron Drive has a two-lane cross section. The eastbound approach to
College Avenue has a, left -turn lane and a through/right-turn lane.
These lanes are not striped, however they function as mentioned above.
There is an unnamed frontage road just (251) west of College Avenue.
This road will serve the office portion of the Redtail PDP.
Existing Traffic
Recent peak hour counts at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
intersection are shown in Figure 2. Raw traffic count data is provided
in Appendix A. The traffic data at the College/Fossil Creek/Cameron
intersection was collected in February 2001.
2
I. INTRODUCTION
This transportation impact study addresses the capacity,
geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development
known as the Redtail PDP. The Redtail PDP is located west of College
Avenue near the existing Cameron Park in Fort Collins, Colorado.
Cameron Park is an established office park that is on both sides of
Cameron Drive. There are signs indicating the developing Fossil Creek
Office Park located just north of Cameron Park.
During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made
with the project planning consultant (VF Ripley Associates), the project
developer (Lagunitas Companies), the Fort Collins Transportation
Planning Staff, and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering Staff. This
study -generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins
transportation impact study guidelines. The study involved the
following steps:
- Collect physical, traffic, and development
- Perform trip generation, trip distribution,
- Determine peak hour traffic volumes;
- Conduct capacity and operational level of
intersections;
- Analyze signal warrants;
data;
and trip assignment;
service analyses on key
- Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit modes of transportation.
1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Page
.1.
Site
Location ........................................
3
2.
Recent Peak
Hour Traffic .............................
4
3.
Site
Plan ............................................
7
4.
Trip
Distribution
....................................
8
5.
Short Range
(2005)
Background Peak Hour Traffic ......
10
6.
Long
Range
(2020)
Background Peak Hour Traffic .......
11
7.
Site
Generated
Peak Hour Traffic .....................
12
8.
Short Range
(2005)
Total Peak Hour Traffic ...........
13
9.
Long
Range
(2020)
Total Peak Hour Traffic ............
14
10.
Short Range
(2005)
Geometry ..........................
18
11.
Long
Range
(2020)
Geometry ...........................
19
APPENDIX
A Recent Peak Hour Traffic
B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions
C Short Range Background Traffic Operation
D Long Range Background Traffic Operation
E Short Range Total Traffic Operation
F Long Range Total Traffic Operation
G Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paqe
I. Introduction .......................................... 1
II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2
Land Use 2
Roads................................................ 2
Existing Traffic ..................................... 2
Existing Operation ................................... 5
Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 5
Bicycle Facilities ................................... 5
Transit Facilities ................................... 5
III. Proposed Development ' ................................. 6
TripGeneration ...................................... 6
Trip Distribution .................................... 6
Background Traffic Projections ....................... 9
TripAssignment ...................................... 9
Signal Warrants ...................................... 9
Operation Analysis ................................... 9
Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 16
Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 20
Transit Level of Service ............................. 20
IV. Conclusions .......................................... 21
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Page
1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 5
2. Trip Generation ...................................... 6
3. Short Range Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation ... 15
4. Long Range Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation'.... 15
5. Short Range Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation 17
6. Long Range Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation ......... 17
r
REDTAIL PDP
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
FEBRUARY 2001
Prepared for:
Lagunitas Companies
3950 JFK Parkway,.Bldg. 12
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Prepared by:
MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: 970-669-2061
FAX: 970-669-5034
6-
�J.
Q7'
a
f � I I
71
�E=1L1 J _:L� IF.i �' \�r �w tL —c -1
YIKO" El VAMN
UYY ('Y tlU L N4S 1 C. L k Y
YNONT [L[Y�TION
amfe Ymluwcs s - Lz
H �l Irk.
■ Rt�,., <tl fiw
M IIIIIIIIIIIIQ a r y�` ilililNlnillb
.BONY [{[YC'RON
nerve NlmnINOB tl Y 1
ru ✓r-rr
=7-
Am1L M
REDTAIL PDP
FOR"FCOLLINS C'OLORAIX)
SURVEYOR
FRONT ELEVATION
BUILDINGS I - 4
ecru. lw -I W
REAR ELEVATION
BUILDINGS I - 4
iG11l INf.l'P
FRONT ELEVATION
BUILDINGS N - Q
9144' ie -1' n
SIDE ELEVATION
BUILDINGS I - 4
A'ALk IM' � 1'P
SIDE ELEVATION
BUILDINGS I - 4
.1<i1L! Ipf .I'Y
awv®
REDTAIL PDP
FORT COLLINS COLORAW
REAR EI EVAMN
BUILDINGS G, J. K LY
LBP7SDJEELEVAJ70N
BUIIDINGSQ J. K L, N
FRONT ELEVATION
BUILDINGSNAI '-
, W-M
RIGHTMDEFJ.EVA710N
BUILDINGS H B I
nNi .a..aa
REDTAIL PDP
FORTCOLLINS COLORADO
TWO BEDROOM FRONT ELEVATION
END ELH\/iyTION
yW- 0
�c
i.e r~r
u-wa
REDTAIL PDP
FORTCOLLINS COLORADO
EXISTING WETLANDS
NITA"
REDTAIL PDP
FORTCOLLINS COLORADO
Thl. l., :.W'd V.: pw..=,D-. .... 1.
+
MAN 1 LIJ 1
P_
eras
NL IUC
i� lms .s
REDTAIL PDP
FORTCOLLINSCOLORAI1n
rnr PI..mY. n..,m.Yl.
c.o.nY.mY m.Y,wm. seas I -m
Ywlw. . I 411weIY Pl.u.
IIlip
ky ,
`t` • I WOODLEY'S FURNITURI
,\ �N� ZONED
EXISTING VEGETATION
do g--•�:_-w�r�om
IIIIIIIIM
�Z.9S'
I I • pW�
ror,r cur �r
o
4
/ �i■ lil •ti roI
Jill
r, I a mREDTAIL `
A,
.D.
Wall
..
SECTION 6 SCALE: I"- IV
!WM
• 1,,pa
°'
Its
LEGEND
O om---
OINY iM if
® WUIWMIIW
uroNola xuaunwe
Uw.no_m rmam w. ws
B ma�ai
u�is_ uwa
.m...u.
1. IN4.®W.4Y
WOODLEY'S FJRNITURE
ZONED C
EXISTING VEGETATION
I.
I ,.
WW._ Tom, ��►
wM
41ili
.m
Tl-
TREE PROTECTION NOTES/ WATER USAGE TABLE
Mills
.w.... ..—W •r
yi�iY Wwi.�Y.� r.w`.�w�wmiYw.m�. v•.xm
.� �.._w.� ww�.� Y�i.uw wwni N F•'n iiu� r u • N.u. mM
.^"� =q
r r:�°��nN�.o.n.r
•.'^.
w...�.-w r-�.
��y'?-`.3.T'::
.�. i.as�m
REDTAIL PDP
FORTCOLLINS COLORAIX)
f=� I
TYu 1.. I.uJ Ilv Yl.umq IFrcumuo4 �0 •u
.1 . co C,.L an Yo I., P.—
SCNE Y-m'
Nelrt W Qnl au�lw..le(
Sr®C Elo�ikr.4pW \\ �. •\` vICpEYtlr.Wllwk I �
/"\
E 3
/ 4 ' -- ��• _ SECTION
i IP4ASE I ---- -------------
NOT roSCALE
* E� LEGEND
NV VLIIFNI
• Eb
i
y
it Q n \ �')�uYwFwGRYI.
a1 os
OWNER
- GUNO.vtl4O c'4UM � 1"».: ' uerwr'Y «
I T I H 1 eaol.wowun rr �...wm
ice• I w \ FOSSIL CREEK OFFICE PARK mvr
I} of
P.
ncoon-
q I 1: I I 1! , .rn[ocwww.,x lxrwru
I �II I2 qyg! uo `�-- - \w-a tlw R ® ¢cor.Eronwotlrn
wl�
ENG.N ER
•WIOw .. _ .y».».n.r�w �—..—MDIN Mw.YRIE,w
ki E"
SURVEYOR
CAMERON PARK OFFICE PARK
{
1 ' \ I wr.c malt Clfff \\R
iiRr►iY .sons ur
. r:-n.-------------=� REDTAIL PDP
a �j'`�, - - --- -- _ _�__. \ • FORTCOI.LINS COLORADO
_ Fi=F9 _..
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING DETAILS ALTERNATE OFFICE BUILDING DETAILS
PARKING .n
n.re-e
VICINITYMAP Q OWNER'S CERTIFICATION
DIRECTOR OF PUNNING
.1 ....r i— I.— u. W .w._+...., . w.
MN(Y.�.I unw rW a m'M']]' [_I. .ranrW. w ]nlre Il�l.l +MMY wr w/Yn _w
Y rnY~eJ; wn pWw w a� pniW ni M ,s.rn W aw W M s Lw M .
uViS gnu N'0',�_nWW,rn vnMwp.�._M Lrw, r.y, wrr wUlOi
uu¢ a,.•»vi.a' c_I «.p ...� °N i.:...°'a.w a n. n i_i . w ..a ,p. �".. a : i
� �I Lmu1.lw'...�.w.n w. eW nrn r.rr..nwu •a Waw.n rwwrra
n M p^w�� wxlr �p a.e ev.rr �n a w�.nu w tl, N ww r. w Wrnil, w a rm
WaW [u se n.r tan.m Yuv l.]q sn a i� n M-r.4^. 4..
�:a rn�wWrr MYW•'aw-..r-r.'Mr ww. Yr•ra9.i wl r, r.nYw.
wrn_r w w w uWr
��,iru`ra�mrrr• ..Y aim r. u.. _.w a r»m w w M ,_.rr M a ],.a
o aow
"°..,arc a:. wri :ram
ne,ru P.w ,wcn•m._ ws.. n.r .... w_u»...
�r m r :r M� wir.:w:.w,..n :r m'� a o� r.�:."i�aY°c..�n i�c u u� i• �a .
1,1 a _ n w naul p w Ar.m w. 4uN rwp
.. �IMI[ nUx] n Roiwwc
w.M.rpw. muawr ..r•w-.r.�r. M.
i�ln-.I-.or n..•ei n�:.~`w" �w.M r�uw pa]
SHEETINDE%
1 T,M S.
a 5 Pon
3. L.nEerape PW
4 Wtle[Y PW
S L,rWeupe PUn
6. tam Plen
Bmlelnp ElevNoru
B &.aep Ew..ww
P flulailp [IewLwlp
f0. NwnpriW omu Eb.erary
�. NFL IC
`
REDTAIL PDP
FORT COLLINS COLORADO
VICINITY MAP 07/20/01
#26-01 Redtail Residential
and Office Park PDP
Type 11 (LUC) 1FF=600•
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 13
5. Staff finds that the granting of the modification from the strict
application of Section 3.4.1 would result in a substantial benefit to
the city because the proposed project would substantially address the
implementation of the MTC and the South College Access
Management Plan, which are both specifically called out as important
community needs in adopted policy.
6. Staff finds that the strict application of 3.4.1 in this case would render
the project practically infeasible because the necessary balance
between the natural features, the MTC's need for moderate
development intensity, and the need for street interconnectivity through
the site can only be accomplished as a result of the relocation of
certain portions of existing wetlands and riparian tree groves.
7. Staff finds that granting the modification request to Section 3.5.2(C)
would not be detrimental to the public good because sensitivity to
the natural feature buffer is achieved by granting the modification.
8. Staff finds exceptional physical conditions exist in the application of
Section 3.5.2(C), which result in unusual and exceptional practical
difficulties in applying the connecting walkway standard in this
instance because the grade is so steep between the building site and
the existing pond.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01.
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 12
D. Division 3.6, Transportation and Circulation
1. Master Street Plan [3.6.1] — South College is shown as a 6 lane
arterial on the Master Street Plan. The South College Access
Management Plan designates Cameron Drive and Fairway Lane as
signalized intersections with College Avenue, and specifically calls
out the need for an internal street network connecting Cameron
Drive and Fairway Lane without the use of College Avenue. This
PDP is consistent with the Master Street Plan, and provides the
required internal street connections, therefore it satisfies this
standard.
2. Streets, Streetscapes, Alleys and Easements [3.6.2] — This section
of the code requires that connections of a private drive with a public
street shall be made with a driveway cut using the detail titled,
"New Driveway Approach" in accordance with City Engineering
standards. The project complies with this standard.
FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSIONS
After reviewing Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01, staff makes the following findings of
fact and conclusions:
1. The proposed uses of two-family dwellings, single family attached
dwellings, multifamily dwellings, and offices are permitted uses in the
(C) Commercial Zoning District subject to administrative review.
2. The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable district
standards of Section 4.17 of the Land Use Code, C - Commercial zone
district.
3. The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable General
Development Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land Use Code
except in Sections 3.4.1 and 3.5.2(C) where modifications are
requested.
4. Staff finds that granting the modification request to section 3.4.1 would
not be detrimental to the public good because the restored wetlands,
riparian tree plantings, and the restoration of the natural habitats and
features buffer zones in their new configuration will provide more
ecological value than is lost.
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 10
c. Practically infeasible
Justification — Three very important factors need to be
considered when analyzing the feasibility of the project
without the modification to section 3.4.1 of the LUC.
First, as proposed, 80% of the total site area will be
private open space, ponds, wetlands and other
landscaped area. Second, achieving this amount of
development intensity next to the MTC is important
because it enhances the efficiency of the usage of the
Corridor by locating people right at the transportation
source. And finally, the street interconnectivity within and
through the site is extremely important to provide a north -
south local street connection alternative to College
Avenue. Achieving this amount of development intensity
and providing the necessary street connectivity are both
only achieved through the relocation of certain portions of
existing wetlands and riparian tree groves. In the review
of the Redtail PDP, staff has made a very comprehensive
effort to require the applicant to apply the intent of the
Land Use Code in a way that best balances all three of
these factors that are important to the City. A successful
balance of these three factors is what really makes this
project feasible.
Staff findings - Staff finds that the strict application of
3.4.1 in this case would render the project practically
infeasible because the necessary balance between the
natural features, the MTC's need for moderate
development intensity, and the need for street
interconnectivity through the site can only be
accomplished as a result of the relocation of certain
portions of existing wetlands and riparian tree groves.
C. Division 3.5, Building Standards
1. Building and Project Compatibility [3.5.11 — The architectural
character is consistent and compatible with the architectural
character of other existing development in the area. Main
entrances face connecting walkways and street sidewalks.
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 9
Staff finding - The restored wetlands, riparian tree
plantings, and the restoration of the natural habitats and
features buffer zones in their new configuration will
provide more ecological value than is lost, therefore
staff finds that granting the modification request would
not be detrimental to the public good.
b. Substantial Benefit to the City.
Justification - The pedestrian/bicycle trail component of
the Mason Transportation Corridor (MTC) will be located
directly adjacent to the site, within and along the eastern
edge of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad
right-of-way. In October of 2000, City Council adopted
the Mason Street Transportation Corridor Master Plan,
which states in its Implementation section that one of the
key strategies for implementing the Plan "is to encourage
residential development at strategic locations, particularly
near planned transit stops and in activity centers." This
site is a strategically important place to locate moderate
density housing because it is located just north of the
imminent convergence of the Fossil Creek Trail and the
MTC's bicycle/pedestrian trail, and is located a block
south of the future South Transit Center for the MTC.
Additionally, the adopted South College Access
Management Plan specifies the need for a parallel
network of local streets internally connecting the
properties on the west side of College Avenue between
Fairway Lane and Cameron Drive. The Redtail PDP
furthers the adopted strategies of implementation of the
MTC, and the South College Access Management Plan.
Staff Findings - Staff finds that the granting of a
modification from the strict application of Section 3.4.1
would result in a substantial benefit to the city because
the proposed project would substantially address the
implementation of the MTC and the South College
Access Management Plan, which are both specifically
called out as important community needs in adopted
policy.
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 8
3. Requested Modification. The applicant requests a modification to
section 3.4.1 of the LUC to allow the removal and replacement of
certain portions of existing wetlands and existing riparian tree
groupings. In accordance with the process stated in 2.8.2(H) of the
LUC, the Planning and Zoning Board may grant a modification of
standards only if it finds that the granting of the modification would
not be detrimental to the public good; and that: (1) the plan as
submitted will promote the general purpose of the standard for
which the modification is requested equally well or better than
would a plan which complies with the standard for which a
modification is requested; or (2) the granting of a modification from
the strict application of any standard would, without impairing the
intent and purpose of this Land Use Code, substantially alleviate an
existing, defined and described problem of city-wide concern or
would result in a substantial benefit to the city by reason of the
fact that the proposed project would substantially address an
important community need specifically and expressly defined and
described in the city's Comprehensive Plan, or in an adopted
policy, ordinance or resolution of the City Council, and the strict
application of such a standard would render the project practically
infeasible; or (3) by reason of exceptional physical conditions or
other extraordinary and exceptional situations, unique to such
property, including, but not limited to, physical conditions such as
exceptional narrowness, shallowness or topography, or physical
conditions which hinder the owner's ability to install a solar energy
system, the strict application of the standard sought to be modified
would result in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties, or
exceptional or undue hardship upon the owner of such property,
provided that such difficulties or hardship are not caused by the act
or omission of the applicant. Any finding made under
subparagraph (1), (2) or (3) above shall be supported by specific
findings showing how the plan, as submitted, meets the
requirements and criteria of said subparagraph (1), (2) or (3).
a. The Public Good.
Justification - Approximately one quarter of an acre of low
quality wetlands, one tenth of an acre of high quality
wetlands, and several groves of riparian forest are being
displaced by this project. They will be mitigated 100%
on -site by the establishment of new, high -quality
wetlands and new riparian tree plantings immediately
adjacent to the existing ponds on -site.
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 7
2. Water Hazards [3.3.3] — The Stormwater Department has reviewed
the application and has indicated that the application satisfies the
requirements of this standard.
C. Division 3.4.1 Natural Habitats and Features
1. General Standard [3.4.1(C)] - Natural features that exist on -site at
the time of development application are intended to be protected to
the maximum extent feasible. As defined on Article 5 of the LUC,
maximum extent feasible shall mean that no feasible and prudent
alternative exists, and all possible efforts to comply with the
regulation or minimize potential harm or adverse impacts have
been undertaken. If the protection of a natural feature is not
feasible in accordance with the definition of maximum extent
feasible, then this General Standard states that it is permissible to
restore or replace the resource value lost to the community either
on -site or off -site. In either case, any impacts to natural features as
a result of the proposed development are intended to be minimized
through the use of buffer zones.
2. Establishment of Buffer Zones [3.4.1(E)] — The average buffer
zone distance between existing natural features and the proposed
building / paved areas of the site exceed the required minimum of
50 feet. Even though the average buffer zone distance is being
satisfied, the applicant does, however, propose to remove several
pockets of the existing on -site wetlands and some portions of
existing on -site riparian forest, and replace such natural features
elsewhere on site. The Establishment of Buffer Zones section of
the LUC requires an average 50-foot buffer from the edge of the
exiting on -site wetlands and also an average 50-foot buffer from
isolated patches of riparian forest. Although the average buffer
distance satisfies this standard, there are a few certain specific
instances where portions of the natural features from which the
buffer distances are measured are being removed and replaced
elsewhere on site. In this case, staff supports the request because
of the quality of the proposed mitigation, however, the Buffer
Performance Standards don't provide a method by which such
natural features can be eliminated. An administrative interpretation
by Cameron Gloss on June 20, 2003 determined that such a
request to remove these natural features would require a
modification of standards by the Planning and Zoning Board.
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 6
units and 133 two -bedroom units proposed, therefore a
minimum of 245 off-street spaces is required. The
proposed plan provides a total of 255 parking spaces to
serve these multifamily dwellings. This standard is
therefore satisfied.
Non-residential Parking Maximums: This section of the
Land Use Code limits an office use to a maximum of 3.0
spaces for each 1000 square feet of gross leasable floor
area. In Alternative B, there are 109,234 square feet of
office use, therefore a maximum of 110 parking spaces
can be provided in the parking area that serves the office
buildings. An 80 space underground parking deck is
intended to serve these office buildings, therefore the
requirement is satisfied.
e. Handicap Parking [3.2.2(K)(5)] — There are 2 handicap
spaces provided in convenient locations. The standard is
thereby satisfied.
3. Solar Access, Orientation, Shading [3.2.3] — The layout of the
project does not cast unreasonable shadows within the site or on
adjacent properties so as not to impair the access to sunshine for
potential solar energy systems or for solar -oriented rooftop
surfaces. This standard is therefore satisfied.
4. Site Lighting [3.2.4] —Down-directional, sharp cut-off pole mounted
light fixtures are provided to illuminate parking lots, drive aisles, and
walkway areas. As required, the lighting levels will not exceed 10
foot-candles on site, and the walkways will be illuminated at least
0.5 foot-candles.
B. Division 3.3, Engineering Standards
Plat Standards [3.3.1 ] — As required, the general layout of the lots,
roads, driveways, utilities, drainage facilities, and other services
within the proposed development are designed in a way that
enhances an interconnected street system within and between
neighborhoods. Proper right-of-way has been dedicated for public
streets, emergency access easements, and utility easements have
been provided as needed to serve the area being platted.
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 5
with plant material of sufficient opacity to block the
required amount of vehicle headlights.
d. Parking Lot Interior Landscaping [3.2.1(E)(5)] —All
proposed parking lots provide a minimum of 6% of their
total area as landscaped areas. This standard is
therefore satisfied.
2. Access, Circulation and Parking [3.2.2]
a. Direct On -Site Access and Off -Site Access to Pedestrian
and Bicycle Destinations [3.2.2(C)(6)&(7)] — Direct
sidewalk connections are provided from the on -site
dwellings to the adjacent street network which, in -turn,
provides sidewalk and bicycle connectivity to the future
Mason Transportation Corridor's bicycle/pedestrian trail.
This standard is thereby satisfied.
b. Transportation Impact Study [3.2.2(C)(8)] —The City's
Traffic Engineer and the Transportation Planning
Department have reviewed the applicants Transportation
Impact Study and have found that it meets the required
vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit Level of Service
requirements.
c. Access and Parking Lot Requirements [3.2.2(D)] —
Pedestrian areas are clearly differentiated from vehicular
areas. All off-street parking spaces have unobstructed
vehicular access to and from the public streets. Guest
parking is distributed proportionally to dwelling unit
locations that they are intended to serve. This standard is
therefore satisfied.
d. Parking Lots: Required Number of Spaces for Type of
Use [3.2.2(K)] —
Residential Parking Minimums: This section of the Land
Use Code requires a minimum of 1.5 spaces for each
one -bedroom multifamily or attached dwelling unit, and
1.75 parking spaces for each two -bedroom multifamily
dwelling unit. In Alternative A, there are 8 one -bedroom
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 4
If the western hilltop area's buildings remain residential, both phases of
the PDP together would provide 141 dwelling units (8 units of two-family
dwellings, 37 units of single-family attached dwellings, and 96 units of
multifamily dwellings). In the event the mesa area buildings become office
uses, the PDP will provide up to 109,234 square feet of office and a total
of 49 residential dwelling units (4 units of two-family dwellings, 37 units of
single-family attached dwellings, and 8 units of multifamily dwellings).
2. Division 4.17 of the Land Use Code Commercial District (C)
The proposed uses of two-family dwellings, single family attached
dwellings, multifamily dwellings, and offices are permitted uses in the (C)
Commercial Zoning District subject to administrative review.
The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable district
standards of Section 4.17 of the Land Use Code, C - Commercial zone
district.
3. Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development Standards
The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable General
Development Standards as follows:
A. Division 3.2, Site Planning and Design Standards
1. Landscaping and Tree Protection [3.2.1 ]
a. Street Trees [3.2.1(D)(2)] —The applicant is satisfying the
30 to 40 foot spacing interval requirement, therefore the
PDP satisfies this standard.
b. Minimum Species Diversity [3.2.1(D)(3)] — The applicant
proposes 179 trees. The landscape plan proposes no
more than 15% of a single species of trees, therefore the
PDP satisfies this standard.
c. Parking Lot Perimeter Landscaping [3.2.1(E)(4)] - As
required, the on -site outdoor parking areas are screened
adequately from the street and adjacent residential uses
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 3
adjacent railroad embankment, southeasterly through the site, and
through the northern end of the Redtail Grove Natural Area that outfalls
into Fossil Creek. Cameron Drive currently exists to the east of the site,
and is stubbed to the eastern property line. Fossil Boulevard currently
exists to the north of the site, and is stubbed to the northern property line.
The site has approximately 125 feet of frontage along College Avenue,
and 930 feet of frontage along the BNSF Railroad right-of-way. The Fossil
Creek Trail is planned to be installed within a year or so by the City in the
Redtail Grove Natural Area just south of the site. The City has purchased
property for the South Transit Center of the Mason Transportation Corridor
(MTC) approximately 470 feet north of the site. The bicycle/pedestrian
portion of the MTC connecting the South Transit Center with the Fossil
Creek Trail will be located within the eastern edge of the railroad right-of-
way, immediately adjacent to this site.
The proposed 11.43 acre PDP has 79% of the site (7.29 acres) devoted to
naturalized buffer zones, wetlands, ponds, and landscaped areas. The
PDP is comprised of two distinct development phases separated by the
existing naturalized drainage channel. The portion of the site where the
first phase is proposed is an existing hilltop located along the west side of
the property. The second phase is proposed along the north property line
on the former site of the Mill Brothers Nursery.
Within the western hilltop area of site (the first phase), the applicant
proposes 6 eight -unit condominium buildings, 4 ten -unit condominium
buildings, and 2 two -unit carriage house buildings. Together, the buildings
within this western hilltop area of the site provide 92 dwelling units. The
applicant is requesting that the PDP have the flexibility to substitute the
use of the proposed buildings within this hilltop area be approved as either
the 92 dwelling units or as up to 109,234 square feet of office. In either
scenario, the proposed site layout and building configurations would be
virtually the same. With this flexibility, the application would be allowed to
proceed through Final Plan review leaving the option open until the point
at which Final Plan approval is granted. In order to grant final compliance
approval, the applicant will then be required to choose which land use is to
be vested for the mesa area's buildings.
Within the former nursery area of the site (the second phase), the
applicant proposes 5 six -unit townhome buildings, 1 seven -unit townhome
building, 1 eight -unit condominium building, and 2 two -unit carriage house
buildings. Together, the buildings within this former nursery area of the
site provide 49 dwelling units.
Redtail P.D.P., File # 26-01
November 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
E: C — Existing Cameron Park office development, College Avenue,
vacant Parcel, existing retail shopping center,
Residential (R) Zone in Larimer County — existing single family
detached portion of the Fossil Creek Meadows Neighborhood,
SE: C — Proposed tire store, Fossil Creek Parkway, Fossil Creek,
Residential (R) Zone in Larimer County — Existing single family
attached portion of the Fossil Creek Meadows Neighborhood,
Fossil Creek, neighborhood park,
S: POL — Existing City owned Redtail Grove Natural Area,
W: FA1- Farming Zone in Larimer County — Existing BNSF Railroad
tracks, existing rural residential properties.
N: C — Existing furniture store, existing warehouses, Fossil Boulevard
stubbed to north property line, Fairway Lane, vacant property,
future South Transit Center for the Mason Transportation Corridor.
The property was part of 3 separate annexations: (1) Mill 1st Annexation
in January 1987; (2) Mill 2"d Annexation in January 1987; and (3) Fossil
Creek West 1st Annexation in November of 1988.
The western portion of the project that is located between the existing
naturalized drainage channel and the BNSF Railroad embankment is
included within the area of a previously approved development called
Cameron Park Second Filing which was approved in Larimer County in
December of 1980. The vested rights for the Cameron Park Second Filing
have expired, however it may be helpful to understand some background
information about this project, had it been developed according to the
approval:
• it created 10 office lots for this area which were to be served by an
extension of Cameron Drive and a new internal street segment;
• lots were platted over wetlands, which permitted construction
anywhere on the lots, with no requirements for buffers from natural
features and habitats; and
• street connectivity to Fairway Lane was not established.
The Redtail PDP site is roughly L-shaped site, bisected by a naturalized
drainage channel which flows from the west, through a culvert under the
ITEM NO. 5
MEETING DATE 11/20/03
STAFF Troy Jones
Citv of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Redtail P.D.P., File #26-01
APPLICANT/
OWNER: Jon Prouty
LaGunitas Redtail, Inc.
3944 JFK Parkway, #12E
Fort Collins, CO 80525
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The PDP requests two development scenarios. The first scenario (Alternative A)
proposes 141 dwelling units (8 units of two-family dwellings, 37 units of single-
family attached dwellings, and 96 units of multifamily dwellings). The second
scenario (Alternative B) provides up to 109,234 square feet of office and a total
of 49 residential dwelling units (4 units of two-family dwellings, 37 units of single-
family attached dwellings, and 8 units of multifamily dwellings). This proposed
development is located north of the City's Redtail Grove Natural Area, west of the
intersection of College Avenue and Cameron Drive, south of Fairway Lane, and
east of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad tracks. The site is in the
C - Commercial zone district.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The proposed uses of two-family dwellings, single family attached dwellings,
multifamily dwellings, and offices are permitted uses in the (C) Commercial
Zoning District subject to administrative review, however, the applicant has
chosen to consolidate the PDP request with a request for modifications to the
Land Use Code. The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable
district standards of Section 4.17 of the Land Use Code, C - Commercial zone
district. The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable General
Development Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land Use Code except in
Sections 3.4.1 and 3.5.2(C) where modifications are requested. The modification
requests satisfy the necessary justifications needed in order to grant a
modification.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO80522-0580 (970) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT