Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOLD TOWN NORTH, 3RD FILING - PDP - PDP160017 - CORRESPONDENCE -Comment Number: 27 4pomment Originated: 08/15/2016 08/15/2016: Please revise the vacation statement as marked on sheet 1. See redlines. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 08/15/2016 08/15/2016: Please add the reception numbers shown in the Monumentation Legend. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/15/2016: This has not been completely corrected. 06/15/2016: The title on all sheets needs to match the Subdivision Plat. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/16/2016 The submitted traffic study information has been reviewed and the conclusions accepted. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/14/2016 06/14/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Zoning Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416-2743, avandeutekom@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/14/2016 08/9/2016: This has not been changed on the Land Use chart 06/14/2016: Accessory studio units should be called studio dwelling units. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: The community office should have 4 bicycle parking spaces. M DATUM. SURRAING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NG*9 UNADJUSTED FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88 - X.XX�. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/16/2016: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. 06/15/2016: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/16/2016: There are still issues. Mask all text in line work and/or hatching. See redlines. 06/15/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. The sheets marked are just showing examples of the issues. Please correct all issues throughout the plan set. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/16/2016: There are still issues. Mask all text in line work and/or hatching. See redlines. 06/15/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. The sheets marked are just showing examples of the issues. Please correct all issues throughout the plan set. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/16/2016: There are still issues. Mask all text in line work and/or hatching. See redlines. 06/15/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. The sheets marked are just showing examples of the issues. Please correct all issues throughout the plan set. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 08/16/2016 08/16/2016: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/15/2016: These were not received. 06/15/2016: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at jcounty@fcgov.com Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/15/2016: This has not been corrected. 06/15/2016: Please add dedication information for all street rights of way. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/15/2016: This has not been corrected. 06/15/2016: Please label the bearings on the boundary in a clockwise direction. See redlines. 13 any curb cuts, 11f}2ts, etc. and show the proposed conveyancerough the proposed sidewalk. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/08/2016 O8/17/2016: A meeting is required to discuss the model. O6/08/2016: The drainage report discusses that the SWMM model produced with this report for the 36-inch storm sewer under Suniga Dr. does not include the original planned flows to the west. The model needs to include all flows that are currently planned to flow into this storm sewer and the additional flows of this development, including the swale just south of Suniga Road. Please revise the SWMM model. Additional conveyance may be required to convey the flows from this development to the regional detention pond. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/08/2016 08/17/2016: The LID mitigation proposed does not meet the City's requirements. A meeting is suggested to discuss options. 50% of the site must be treated with a LID technique. 06/08/2016: The Low Impact Development standards are required for this development per the Conceptual Review comments. Please reference these comments for details. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 06/14/2016 06/14/2016: There may be more comments forthcoming upon further review of the plans associated with this project. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: The outfall storm sewer into the NECCO pond needs to be placed at it's ultimate position with the permanent pond configuration. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: A restrictor plate or pipe is required to assist in the tailwater affects that will fill the detention pond. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/16/2016: This has not been completely corrected. 06/15/2016: Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL 12 variety to the arcoural aspects and components of the build* in order to comply with the standard. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: Similarly, Staff is concerned about the potential repetitive character of Osiander, particularly with its narrow cross-section. As a narrow local street, with lots that are only 35 feet wide, there is a critical need to ensure that the character of the street is considered and designed in such a way as to mitigate the overall density of the street. Section 3.5.2(C)(1)(a,b) requires that there beat least three single family detached housing models. Toward this end, Staff encourages the applicant to provide a baseline minimum of at least six front porch designs and styles so that there is a rich variety of building forms that break up the potential monotony. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: On the Lighting Plan, please delete the performance data and enlarge the fixture description. The schedule indicates a quantity of zero for C fixture in which case the line item for this fixture can be deleted. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-224-6035, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 08/11/2016 08/11/2016: The Erosion Control Report (Stormwater Management Control) submitted was incomplete and not current neither for City Erosion Control Requirements nor for State SWMP requirements please submitted at FDP. The current erosion control measures as shown on the submitted plans are still lacking some protection along pipe inlets as well as a few other minor redlined issues. Please refer to redlines for further detail. The erosion control escrow calculations will need to be revised based on modifications made to the plan. Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtaylor@fcqov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/14/2016 06/14/2016: Add notes to the appropriate pages stating that an approved floodplain use permit prior to beginning any work proposed within the existing floodplain. Topic: General Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/14/2016 06/14/2016: It is difficult to decipher what is proposed and what is existing. Please do a better job of differentiating. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/08/2016 08/17/2016: Please label the curb cuts and sidewalk chases. 06/08/2016: The conveyance for basins 4,5,6 & 9 after flows leave the parking areas is not depicted on the grading or drainage plan. Please show on the plans how flows will leave the hard surface and enter the swale. Please label 11 vehicle to pull 09 But, there are three more intersections o0e south side. Note that one intersection is labeled Baum Alley but it is really Baum Street. The Site Plan should indicate that there are more than five opportunities to pull over when combined with the intersections on the south side of the street. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: Please further describe any planned improvements within the 10,000 square foot central feature / gathering area. This common area will be important as the two-family attached dwellings essentially have no private outside space except for decks and balconies. As indicated, the area appears passive with no active amenities. Are there any plans for picnic table(s), grills, shade structure, seat walls, pet stations, etc.? Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: By being located on the north side of the walkway, the exterior fixed bike racks look remote from the units. Staff recommends these be placed on the south side of the walkway, closer to the front doors, to provide a better sense of security. Or, perhaps a logical location would be adjoining the three parking lots. On Site Plan Note number 11, please add "...to concrete and not interfere with landscaping and walkways." Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016: On the Site Plan, please indicate whether or not Emmaus Lane is public or private. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016: On the Landscape Plan, please fill in the 80-foot gaps in street trees along Suniga by placing Ornamentals to within 15-feet of the streetlights. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016: On the Landscape Plan, please consider how landscaping and land form can contribute to attenuating the potential road noise that will be associated with Suniga Road as a four -lane arterial street. With this classification, Suniga is expected to carry between 15,000 and 35,000 vehicles per day. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016: At Final, on the Landscape Plan, the area at the head of the parking lots described as "planting area to screen parking lot" will be required to be planted in a dense fashion, with the appropriate species, to achieve 75% opacity on a year-round basis. Comment Number: 21 08/17/2016 08/17/2016 08/17/2016 08/17/2016 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: Regarding the two-family attached dwellings, please note that Sections 3.5.2(C)(2)(a,b) require that for any such development containing more than five buildings, there must be at least three distinctly different building designs. The standard goes on to clarify that building designs shall be considered similar unless they vary significantly in footprint size and shape, and that such variation among buildings shall not consist solely of different combinations of the same building features. Staff is concerned that while four rear elevations are provided, on an overall basis, all 12 buildings feature essentially the same building envelope. Staff recognizes that with the odd configuration of the parcel, it may be challenging to significantly vary the building footprint size. As mitigation, therefore, the applicant is encouraged to add 10 Department: Planning Ser�lCes • Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: For the single family detached elevations, there is no scale. But it appears that houses are exceptionally narrow. Please note that on a 35-foot wide lot, minus the two 5-foot wide sideyard setbacks, there remains 25 feet of lot width for a building envelope. The elevations appear as if the width of the houses is considerably less than 25 feet. The applicant is encouraged to take advantage of the parking being in the alley and make the front porches as wide as the house. August 17, 2016 - Carried Over: See comment regarding housing model variety. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: For the two-family attached dwellings, Staff appreciates the effort to provide two building styles. Please indicate on the site plan how these two styles are distributed. In order to mitigate the potential of the alley becoming overly repetitive, Staff encourages the design team to consider either introducing and additional building style or further individualizing the Unit A entrances so that there is a greater degree of distinctiveness among the 24 entrances divided among the 12 buildings. August 17, 2016 - Carried Over: See comment regarding building model variety. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Since Unit A does not really have any available and functional outdoor space, please provide a dimension for the second floor balconies and decks. August 17, 2016 - Carried Over: See comment regarding the open space. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: On the Site Plan, please add a label that clarifies the usage of Tract B. Please state that this access is restricted and equipped with a gate such that it can only be used by emergency vehicles and equipment, pedestrians and bicycles and not available to the general public in vehicles. Further, please add a detail for the gate that shows how such gate will not impede access by pedestrians and bicycles. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: On the Site Plan, please add line work or show a broader context that labels and indicates the existing alleys and streets that intersect Osiander on the south side of the street. These intersections will also provide "bump -out" capability for drivers who are not comfortable passing an oncoming vehicle when cars are parked on the south side of the street. The narrative states that there are three bump -outs on the north side of the street and one alley and Baum Street on the south side creating five opportunities for an opposing 9 Comment NumTier: 4 • Comment Originated: 06/10/2016 06/10/2016: Streetlights will be placed along public streets. A 40 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and streetlights. A 15 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between ornamental trees and streetlights. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/10/2016 06/10/2016: The location of the water and electric services will need to be coordinated with Light and Power Engineering. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/10/2016 06/10/2016: Please contact Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 221-6700. Please reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/16/2016 08/16/2016: No changes on behalf of Light & Power since June 10, 2016 review. Please contact us if there are any questions. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/10/2016 08/10/2016: HOA AGREEMENT The HOA agreement will need to account for snow removal and long-term maintenance on the fire lane between Lots 15 & 16. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/17/2016 08/17/2016: FIRE LANE SIGNAGE Signage is required on both south and north connections of the EAE (between Lot 15 and 16). As the intent is to restrict pass -through traffic at this location, signs should read, "Emergency Access Only". Otherwise, "Fire Lane - No Parking" is the standard. Code language provided below. MARKING > IFC503.3: Where required by the fire code official, approved signs or other approved notices that include the words NO PARKING - FIRE LANE shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or prohibit the obstruction thereof. The means by which fire lanes are designated shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times and be replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility. OBSTRUCTION OF FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS >IFC 503.4 Fire Apparatus access roads shall not be obstructed in any manner including the parking of vehicles. The minimum widths and clearances established in 503.2.1 shall be maintained at all times. 2012 International2fiergy Conservation Code (IECC) • 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC. 2. Multi -family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. 3. Commercial and Multi -family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. Old town north 3rd — project specific concerns: 1. Fire -sprinkler systems are required for townhomes and duplexes. 2.3. All windows above the 1 st floor require minimum sill height of 24" 3. Building code and State statute CRS 9-5 requires project provide accessible units. 4. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling. 5.7. Low -flow Watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are required. 6. Special combustion safety requirements for natural draft gas appliances. 7. Low VOC interior finishes. Department: Light And Power Contact: Coy Althoff, CAlthoff@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/10/2016 06/10/2016: Single phase electric facilities exist along the N. side of Osiander St. and also dead -ended at the end of Blodel St. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/10/2016 06/10/2016: Development charges, electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this development. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/10/2016 06/10/2016: Contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the transformer and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility plans. 7 Comment Number: 2 �omment Originated: 06/20/2016 06/20/2016: Show the location of stop signs with a distinct symbol and place street tree at least 20 feet from stop signs. List the symbol for stop signs in the Legend. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/20/2016 06/20/2016: The two street trees along Redwood just north of Ossiander are under overhead transmission lines. The one closest to the corner is also near a storm water line. It appears only the north street tree along Redwood will work. Change the species to a smaller ornamental tree, either red baron crabapple of Japanese tree lilac. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/20/2016 06/20/2016: The east most street tree along the north side of Osiander is close to the corner and a storm water line. It doesn't appear it will work for visibility and utility reasons. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/20/2016 06/20/2016: If not already shown clearly show the locations of all street lights and check that the tree light spacing requirement is meet. 40 feet for canopy shade trees 15 feet for ornamental trees Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Building Permit Pre -Submittal Meeting: Pre -Submittal meetings are required to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new commercial or multi -family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid -design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi -family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre -submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) Topic: Landscape Plat • Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/14/2016 08/08/2016: Previous Round 1 comment still applies regarding Landscape Plan plantings: will review details of planting plan for shrub/perennial areas when provided - receipt at final plan is okay for Environmental Planning. Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, Topic: General Comment Number: 4 sblochowiak@fcqov.com Comment Originated: 08/08/2016 08/08/2016: Both the water quality and native seed mixes include a nice diversity of native species suited to this eco-region. City Staff would like to see the following (orbs to the dryland seed mix:: H. annuus (common sunflower); C. tinctoria (Plains coreopsis); C. serrulata (Rocky Mountain beeplant); (M. tanacetifolia (tansyaster); R. columnifera (Mexican hat). This will aid in more rapid establishment, help the native plants out -compete weeds, and provide nutritional resources for local pollinator species. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016 08/08/2016: Currently on proposed plans, approximately 18% of proposed trees are Gleditsia spp., both Imperial and Skyline varieties of honey locust. While these trees are hardy and urban -adapted, they are often overused in urban landscapes. In addition, honey locust varieties sold are cultivated to be seed -less and thorn -less, thus greatly decreasing their value to wildlife. City Staff would like to see a re -distribution of the project tree species diversity through a decrease in number of honey locust trees and corresponding increase in: G. dioica (Kentucky coffee tree), O. macrocarpa (Burr oak), and/or T. cordata (Littleleaf linden). Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016 O8/08/2016: THANK YOU for selecting 3000K (or less) corrected color temperature light fixtures in accordance with The American Medical Association (AMA) and International Dark -Sky Association (IDA) recommendations. For further information regarding health effects and night lighting please see: http://darksky.org/ama-report-affirms-human-health-impacts-from-leds/ Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/20/2016 06/20/2016: Contact the City Forester for an onsite meeting to evaluated existing trees, construction impact and if needed tree mitigation. It appears that some of the groves of mature cottonwoods are located on this site. Retain significant trees to the extent reasonably feasible. I Comment Number: 45 "Pomment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 45. Site and Landscape plans — not grass pavers in the ROW. For the emergency access - concrete between the back of curb and sidewalk. If the emergency access drive is to have a gate or anything like that I will want to see details on the design. We want it restricted so it can not swing out into the ROW across the sidewalk or into the street. Comment Number: 46 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 46. Site plan — have a note along Blondel at the alley that says Wayfinding and no parking sign. If the wayfinding is the street sign with the alley name on it that is fine. I don't know what is intended by Wayfinding sign, but only regulatory signs are allowed within the ROW. So if it is intended to be some sort of sign with addresses or information on where to go it will need to be located behind the sidewalk and outside of the ROW. Comment Number: 47 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 47. The only comment above that needs to be resolved prior to hearing is the storm cover. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, rverette@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/14/2016 08/08/2016: Previous Round 1 comment still applies regarding prairie dogs, with a few additional notes added. 1) City Code and the Land Use Code require that any prairie dogs inhabiting a site shall be relocated or eradicated by the developer prior to any site grading or construction activities. If prairie dogs are to be eradicated, this must be done humanely using city -approved and Colorado Division of Wildlife approved methods [see LUC Section 3.4.1(N)(6)]. 2) A prairie dog removal plan will need to be provided at the time of Final Plans, and documentation of the removal activities provided prior to the issuance of a Development Construction Permit. If prairie dogs are to be eradicated rather than relocated, City Staff recommend use of carbon monoxide fumigation as opposed to other eradication methods. Documentation of removal should be in the form of a dated and signed letter or memo from the contractor. 3) Should this project gain approval and proceed to construction, a burrowing owl survey, in accordance with the Division of Parks and Wildlife standards, shall be conducted prior to construction by a professional, qualified wildlife biologist and prior to prairie dog relocation or eradication. Documentation can be in the form of a letter or memo from the wildlife biologist (in the case of the burrowing owl survey) and contractor (in the case of prairie dog eradication). 4 Comment NumP 38 IRmment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 38. For the pull offs. As was discussed at the meeting when we decided to use the pull offs a modified shorter roll curb is to be used. The plans are currently showing these areas as being flush with the street. We do not want that. I am suggesting the curb design that Longmont uses as a modified shorter curb. The detail does need to be modified to have our standard 2 foot pan with a 2 inch drop. But this curb will provide a lower profile (4.5 inches) and is something that is already being built in Colorado. I will email the curb detail to Shear. Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 39. Osiander Design — Is this the centerline profile — it is not labeled. Will need to provide flowline profiles at final. You have two different slopes labeled on a portion of the profile — which is it? Change could impact the VC. I think for Osiander the horizontal curve is within the existing pavement area, but since you have chosen to do centerline stationing you will need to identify true slopes and grades for the areas within the curve. Need to provide existing elevations for the cross pans. Comment Number: 40 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 40. The new storm pipe at the east end of Osiander is not meeting minimum cover requirements. A minimum of 3 feet from the top of pipe to the top of street is required.08/19/2016: Comment Number: 41 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 41. Alley Design — I am guessing that the profile provided is for the centerline, since this alley doesn't have a center V-pan we just need the flowline and outside edge of alley profile. Since you have chosen to use centerline stationing rather than flowline stationing you will need to label and identify on the plans what the true lengths and slopes are around the curves. Comment Number: 42 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 42. Alley Design — you are showing grade breaks at the alley entrances that don't meet standards. Either need to use VC in these locations or you can submit a variance request with your design information and justification for consideration. Comment Number: 43 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 43. Alley Design — at the flowline the low point in any street is required to have .5% going in and out of the low point. Since the alley slopes to one side — I would use the VC along the south edge to reduce the dip effect, but the flowline needs to meet the minimums. Need s sidewalk culvert or inlet at the low point in order to get the flows into the parking lot. Comment Number: 44 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 44. The emergency access will need to be a roll curb - not a driveway. Our standard roll curb can be used or the modified lower curb that is to be used at the pull-out can be used. We do not allow grass pavers within the ROW, so the area between the roll curb and the sidewalk needs to be concrete. 3 Comment Number: 28 4pomment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: 28. The driveways into the parking lots need to be built per detail 706.2 with the flare in order for the sidewalks to meet ADA standards. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: 29. Reminder minimum flowline grade is .5% and that is what is required going into a low point in the street or alley. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: 31. The intersection detail will be checked when full profiles are provided. Transition lengths will need to be labeled on the intersection details. Will need intersection details for the street/ alley and alley/alley intersections as well. Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/19/16: 32. Looks like the sidewalk chase detail is still needed. 06/15/2016: 32. Based on the plans right now the following additional details are needed: 702 � roll curb for alley section, 1202, 1201, 1606a, 706.2, sidewalk chase i if in City ROW City detail must be used - if on private property you can use D-11 or create your own detail. Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: 33. The site has shallow water — Please know that sump pumps can only be tied into an approved drainage facility and cannot be drained out across sidewalks or into the curb and gutter or into the streets/ alleys. A paragraph will be added into the development agreement giving builders and property owners notice of this. This needs to accounted for in your design and plans. Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: 34. See plans for additional comments. Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 35. Plat — The note under note 4 of the General Survey Notes has a misspelling. It should be BY the City of Fort Collins — not BE the City of Fort Collins. Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 36. Plat - In the easement description legends — ESMT A needs to be as dedicated on this plat. As the plat has a note that all easements dedicated by the Old Town North plat are being vacated. Thus the easement needs to be rededicated by this plat. ESMT G it would be sheet 3 of 4 not 3 of 3. Comment Number: 37 Comment Originated: 08/19/2016 08/19/2016: 37. Our standards Street Cut Note below needs to be added to the following plan sheets. 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 14. Basically any sheet that is showing work for which the street will be impacted. Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. 2 • City of Fit Collins August 19, 2016 Terry Palmos Greeley Associates 419 Canyon Ave #200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 t� RE: Old Town North 3rd Filing, PDP160017, Round Number 2 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/deve/opi77entieview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/19/16: 7. My recommendation for the vacation Note is that is reads: By approval of and recording of this plat by the City of Fort Collins, Colorado. All Previous Easements Dedicated by Old Town North plat within the boundaries of this plat are hereby vacated. 06/15/2016: 7. Plat - Need to address the vacation of the existing easements on the property. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 08/19/16: 23. We discussed this at the Wednesday morning meeting and sidewalk chases are going to be needed to get the drainage from the alley into the parking lots. Please let me know if there are still questions about this. 06/15/2016: 23. Per the City�s driveway details the drainage as you have shown it going into the parking lots off of the alley will not work as the area will slope back into the alley rather than into the parking lot. Probably need to do a driveway chase in these areas in order to get the drainage to the north, provide the driveway requirements and meet ADA requirements on the sidewalk you have planned along here.