The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutKMART PLAZA, FULLER'S TEXACO - PDP - 38-97A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYI ' the sidewalk system should be completed by the city or Colorado ' State University (Vet Center). The Pedestrian LOS WorksheeL is provided. in Appendix G. The minimum level of service for activity corridor is B for all ' measured. categories. This level of service will be satisfied for most categories, except street crossings. By definition, the street crossing category for crossings at the College/Drake ' intersection and across Drake Road will not be at level of service B. However, i.t is very unlikely that the proposed use will generate significant pedestrian traffic. Bicycle Level of Service 1 This site is directly connected to the on -street bike lanes on Drake Road. Therefore, the base connectivity is at level of. service C as shown on Appendix G. This use will not generate significant bicycle traffic. Transit. Level of Service Current transit service exists on Drake Road and College Avenue. Future transit will also exist in the BNRR Corridor as ' depicted. on the Fort Collins 2015 Transit Plan. Future transit level of service will be acceptable. Transit will be at 20 minute headways. The travel time factors are calculated at less than 2.0, ' which is the minimum allowed. By definition, peak load factors will be < 1.2. An analysis is provided in Appendix G. I 11 1 i ' 19 1" = 1500' SITE LOCATION s Figure 1 �2fI NS:j j L� S ' CS v /)uTG T -T /0. 7/t,.rN ' TkCA r -r - I.9Hr@ farP/V = 9. S + 5 yv = /�/. 5 TTG= /.36 PLF`/.� A u To Tr t . 0 & , ,ollfloP ; 3 + S �lpv = F /t,t tN -rx Ali TT 1.o CII) l,�mP/-) = S +S w l&/ttxn/ T r` F = /, 5 140.k s - / 6 /n r ' LoS -� rC /-/S it rf To o/�4P/i " �' 3 , 0 �T. ]� 01 4 I ' I.o s - A ' c 6 1) -r--7- _ 5 C� - 0 ,�+Fri = 7 , S 5 r�N -r -r 57.5 I P�f� 1 I m m m m r m m Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service - connectivity nmmnan actual proposed base connectivity: C specific connections to priority sites: description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address F, 0 [3 [4] destination area classification (see text) p. 20 City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 18 LOS Standards For Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: A 6 rsV ±- %y c 1: ti r r,/4- (enter as many as apply) a IIa IF description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address jV R �.SIQ6.v-r2Ac srrl- Ar Xz�- e wstiG A ' k �rn,4r< r destination area level of service (minimum based on project location classification) classification (see text) drwtnes• anrmu r NerarS 3a rr amti gr amm en J /2r GcNr actual C � C- C R Proposed mr=��AA lam- JrC IM moinnan actual pruposed City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan APPENDIX G r = M= M= r= M= M W = = M== r M� HCS: Unsionalized intersections Release 2.1e Gage Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hal i Gainesville. FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0376 Streets: (N-S) .Jiffy Lube (E-W) Drake Major Street Direction._.. EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Anaivst................... jmd Date of Analysis.......... 1/12i96 Other Information......... am C® 1998 short "on bkgrd Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R 1 L T R L T R __-- _--_---- _-___ ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield Nf N; Volumes 744 957 35; 5 PHF .95 .95 .95; .95 Grade 0 0 0 Me's (%) SU/RV's (%)� CV's (%) PCE's 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor- Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.1e Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step is RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) oLz Potential Capacity: (pcph) 753 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 753 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 ------------------------------------------ ______________ intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh)_ -_--_ (sec/veh) 4.6 SB R 6 753 4.6 0.0 A intersection Delay = 0.0 secjveh Page 2 M a s M w= M= M w M M= w� s a HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.ie Page Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville. FL 32611-2063 Ph: (904) 392-0376 Streets: (N-S) Jiffy Lube (E-W) Drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analvst................... jmd Date of Analysis......... 1/12/96 Other- information....._.. pm 1996 short iobkgrd Qtotai Two-way Stop -controlled Ini7ersection Eastbound 'Westbound Northbound I Southbound i L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes ; 0 2 0 ; 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 ; 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N; N; Volumes 702 474 30; 5 PHF .95 .95 _95) .95 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%); PCE's(%) 1.10 PCE ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized intersections Release 2.ie Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street N8 S8 Conflicting Flows: (vph) eco Potential Capacity: (pcph) i015 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1015 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: D-99 -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Gueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ _____ _______ 3.6 S6 R 6 1015 3.6 0.0 A intersection Delay = 0.0 secjveh M m m m No m m m M m m W m m m m r i m HCS: Unsionalized intersections Release 2.le Page Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall iiainesville. FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Kmart/Soradley Barr (E-W) Drake Major Street Direr_tion.... EW /V0 M S/1/0 R Lenqth of Time A.nalyzed... 60 (min) Analyst. ................ I - jma LEFT TURNS bate of Analysis.......... 1/12/96 Other information......... am< r n background tota' Two-way Stop -controlled intersection _______________________ Eastbound Westbound •, Northbound Southbound L I R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 2 < u u u i u u i Stop/field N; N Volumes 190 696 151 20 891 95: 201 210 PHF .95 .95 .95: .95 -.95 .95 .95i .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) i SU/RV's t%); CV's (%) i PCE's ;1.10 ;1.10 , 1.10; i.lc _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Maneuver Gap (tg) ---------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.50 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 Left Turn Minor- Road 7.00 HCS: Unsiqnalized intersections Release 2.1e Paqe 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB S8 ________________________________________________________ Confiictina Flows: (voh) 374 5i9 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 895 756 Movement Capacity: (pcpn) 895 756 Prob. or Oueue-Free State: 0.97 0.68 Step from E6 -Major ----`-- --�tr_�_t_____________W6 Conflicting Flows: (vph) ___________ 749 1036 Potential CaPaCitV: IPCPh) 679 475 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 679 475 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: ________________________________________________________ 0.97 0.54 intersection performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Oueue Approach Rate cap cap Delay Lenqth LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) _______ _______ _____ (sec/veh) _________ ________ ______ ______ ______ 4.1 N6 R 23 895 4.1 0.'i A 7.0 SB R 243 756 7.0 1.6 5 Follow-up EB L 220 475 i4.1 2.8 C 3.0 Time (tf) W8 L 23 679 5.5 0.0 6 0.1 2 10 intersection Delay = 2.0 sec/veh 2.60 3.30 3.40 HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2-le Page Center For- Microcomputers in transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0376 --------- ---------------------------------------- Str-eets (N-S) Kmart/Spradley Barr (E-W) Drake Major Street DDirection.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) /i/C) /v1Si0O1-� Analyst ................... jmd Date of Analysis.......... 1/12/98 LrFr juiF/u5 Other Inforam mation ........ pm ipna background otai Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R 1 L T R �___- ____ _--_---- --_- __- __ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 1 2 < 0 0 0 1 u 0 i Stop/Yield N; N; Volumes 90 678 iu; 20 447 3) 45 pHF .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95; .95: .95 Grade 0 u 1 u 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's Cv' %) PCE�s :i. 0 ;1.10 1.10 1.10 --------------------------------------------- __________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5-50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left iurn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.le Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street Na SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 362 252 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 906 i632 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 908 1032 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.99 0.95 Step LT fom --________-_ EB -c ____-----Major-Street-------------W Conflicting Flows: (Vph) 725 503 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 700 921 Movement Capacity: (Pcph) 700 92i Prob. of ________________________________________________________ Oueue-Free State: 0.97 0.69 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Aoproach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (Pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh)- _ _ (sec/veh) 4.0 NB R 12 908 4.0 0.0 A 3.7 SB R 52 1032 3.7 0.0 A EB L i05 92i 4.4 0.4 A 0.5 WB L 23 700 5.3 0.0 8 0.2 Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh Page 2 HCS: Uns igna iized intersections Release 2.ie Page Center- For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville. FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Kmart/Spradley Barr (E-W) Drake Major Street Direction.... EW Lenqth of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analvst................... jmd Date of Analysis.......... iii2/98 Other information......... am prig i99a short�iong bkgrdt�ai Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound ; Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R __-_ _'__ ____�____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ No. Lanes 1 0 i 2 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1 Stop/field I Ni Volumes 190 696 i5; 20 891 95; 5 i 20; 60 i 210 PHF .95 .95 .95; -95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95 Graae 0 0 0 0 MC's t%) SU/RV's (%l CV's (%) PCE's ;1.i0 ;1.10 ;i. i0 i. i0 1.10;1.i0 i.i0 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) _____________________ Time (tf) --------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignaiizeo intersections Release 2.ie Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step l: RT from Minor Street NB S8 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 374 5i9 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 895 756 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 895 756 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 0.66 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: ILT from Major- Street WB EB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 749 1036 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 679 475 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 679 475 Prob. of Dueue-Free State: 0.97 0.54 ------------- --- ------------------------------- Steo 3 7H from Minor- Street Na SB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2000 1956 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 74 76 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.52 0.52 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 3a 4u- Prob. of Queue -Free State: ------- _______-_ 0.970-98 ------------------------------ Step 4: LT from Minor Street N5 56 ________________________________________________________ Confiicting Flows: (vph) 1900 1942 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 65 61 Major LT. Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.5i 0.51 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.61 0.6i Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.41 0.59 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 27 36 intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate cap Cap Delay Length LDS Delay Movement (pcph) (peph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ (van) _____ (sec/ven) NB L 6 27 > N6 T I 38 > 109 45.5 1.2 F 45.] N6 R 23 695 > SB L 69 36 > 36 r i9.5 F SB T i 40 > 452.4 5B R 243 7-56 7.0 1.6 a EE L 220 475 14.1 2.6 C 3.0 WB L 23 679 5.5 0.0 a intersection Oelav = 57.4 sec/ven The aicuiateo 'tea lUc- _,s or curer than 9y9.9. Jon HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.ie Paqe Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2063 Ph: (904) 392-6378 ----------------------------------- --- ---------------------------- ------------------------------------------- Streets: (N-S) Kmartj Spraciley Barr (E-W) Drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min7 Analyst... imd Date of Analysis ......... 1/12/98 -tier information........ em pm i998 short ion bkgrdrtotai Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L 1 K L T R --- -- -- --- ---- --- - No. Lanes i 2 0 1 2 - 0 u > < u u > 1 Stopifield N{ N; Volumes 90 678 10I 20 447 J0; i i i0i 30 1 45 PHF .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .95; -95 .95 .95'� .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 u u MC SUjRV's (%); CV's (%) j PCE's 1.10 :1.10 i.iu 1_i0 i.iu;i.i0 i.io 1.i0 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.i0 Right Turn Minor- Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsionalized intersections Release 2.1e Worksheet for TWSC intersection --------- _______________________________________________ Step is RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 362 252 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 906 1032 1�ovement Capacity: (pcph) 908 i113,2 "Prod. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.95 Step 2_LT MajorStreet ___________ EB -from _ - _____________W6 _ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 725 503 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 700 921 Movement Capacity: (pcpn) 700 92i Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.97 0.89 -------------------------------------------------------- Step .3: TH from Minor Street NB -----------SB --------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) i338 1328 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 160 182 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.86 u_86 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 154 156 Prod. of Queue -Free State:u.99 _____ -_ _--__0_99 ----------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street Nis S6 ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1306 1316 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 155 153 Major LT, Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.85 0.85 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.89 0-69 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.84 0.87 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ i3u 134 intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow -Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap flap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(secjveh) ______ ______ ______ (veh) _______ _______ (seejveh) _____ _________ ________ N8 '_ i i30 > N8 T i 154 > 511 7.2 0.0 a 7.2 NB P i2 906 > SB L 35 i34 > i35 36.3 1.2 E 55 T i 156 > 17.0 5B R 52 i032 3.7 0.0 A E6 L i05 92i 4.4 D.4 A 0.5 WE, L 23 700 5.3 u.0 B u.2 intersection Delay = 1.4 seciveh Page 2 7 I 1 I i p 1 F 1 APPENDIX F 1 HCS: Unsiana iized intersections Release 2.le "rage Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 5i2 Weil Hail Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0376 Streets: (N-S) Jiffv Lube (E-W) Drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... jmd Date of Analysis.......... 1/12/98 Other Information... .. ..am �Co>1998 short on hkgrd otal Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L 7 R L I R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 < D 0 0 0 0 D Stop/Yield N; N; Volumes 735 i 969 51 5 PHF .95 .95 .95; .95 Tirade 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1_10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.i0 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized intersections Release 2.ie Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB S8 Confli�tinn Flows: (vPh) 5 i 2 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 762 Movemeni_ Capacity: (pcph) 762 Frog. of Oueue-Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95.'e' Flow Move Shared Total Oueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(seciveh) (veh) (sec/veh) ______ ------ __ ____ ____ _____ _____4_6_ S6 R 6 762 4.8 0.0 A intersection Delay = 0.0 sec%veh HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.1e Page Center For Microcomputer's in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Sainesviile, FL :32611-2083 ph: (904) 592-0378 Streets: (N-S) Jiffy Lube (E-W) Drake Major- Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Anaivst... .............. jmd Date of Analysis.......... 1ii2j96 Other information... .�"am pm i998 snortionc bi<trd total Two-way Stop-controllea Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound i L T R L T R L T R L T R ____ ___ _ ____---- _--__ ___- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N; N; Volumes 696 480 5; 5 FHF .95 .95 .95; .95 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%); CV's (%) PCE's ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors 'Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tt) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Elinor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized intersections Release 2.1e Pate Worksheet for TWSC intersection --------- _____________________.._____.____-_____--_____-__ Step is RT from Minor Street NB SB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 235 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1025 Movemen t. Cap a city: (pop h) 1028 Prob. of Cweue-Free State: 0.99 intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Jueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(secjveh) (veh)- ----_ (secjveh) 3.5 SB R 6 1025 3-5 0.0 A intersection Delay = 0.6 see/veh m m m= m m= mwi= i m m m m m m m m HC3: Unsignaiized Intersections Release 2.1e Paqe ;;enter- For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville. FL 3261i-2O83 Ph: i904) 392-0378 Streets: fN-dl KmartiSpradlev Barr (E-W) broke Major Street Direction.._. Ew _myth of Time Analyzed... oO (ruin), n16 "INOX Ana I ys-t............... jmd Date of Analysis.......... ii i2/98 �.E F% %Uk NS dither information.... ....am rn i•.>np iiackgroun total Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound T R LT P L R L T R ____ ____ _--_---- -___ No. Lanes 1 2 0 2 0 O 0 1 O 0 1 Stopiiield I N; N; Volumes 170 705 15! 20 903 95; 20 165 PMF .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .95: .95i .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 3U/RV`s (%)1 CV'S l%) PCE's Ii.10 i. 10 1 i.iu 1_i0 ---------------------------- ___________________________________________ Adjustment Factors 'vehicle Critical Fo 11ow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.i0 Riqht Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Throuqh Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsianaiized intersections Release 2.1e Pape 2 Work.sheet for TWSC intersection Step l: RT from Minor Street NB r;6 -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows�vpn/ 526 potential Capacity: (pcph) 590 75O MovementCapacity: (pcph) 590 l:iO Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.97 V.71 Step __--LT- - fromMajor --Street _____________w- EB _________-- Confiictinq Flows: (vph) 758 1051 "Potential Capacity: (pcph) 672 468 Movement Capacity: (pcphj 672 468 Prob. of Gueue-Free State: 0-97 0.58 ________________________________________________________ intersection performance Summary Avq. _r5% Flow Move Shared Total uueue Approach Rate cap cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) - (secjveh) ________ ______ ______ _____________ _______ _-_-_4_L_ NB k 23 890 4.2 0.O A 6.7 S6 R 215 750 6.7 1.4 6 E6 L i97 468 i3.3 2.4 C 2.5 WB L 23 672 5.5 0.0 6 O.i intersection Delay = i.7 sec/veh M = ! M = M = = = = i = = = m m m HCS: Unsianalized intersections Release 2.1e Page Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville. FL 32611-2063 Ph: (904) 392-0376 Streets: (N-S) kmartiSoradlev Barr (E-W) braise Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analvzed... 60 imin) n/p AA rA/09 Analyst_ ................. jmci Date of Analysis.......... iji2%96 L 6 Tu,riv" Other information.... . Q Pm on ba CM:arDund total Two-wav Stop -controlled Inter -section Eastbound Westbound Northbound „out'nbound L T R L T R ---- L T R. ____ ___ L T R ____ ____ ---- -___ ____ ____-_ ____ No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 < ;---- 0 i 0 0 1 6 0 1 Stop/Yield N; NI Volumes 70 667 i0: 20 453 301 10; 30 PHF .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .95I .95; .95 Grade V 0 0 u MC's (%) i SU/RV's CV's (%) PCE's i. i0 1.i0 _______________________________________________________________________ i. i0; I.iO Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (if) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3-30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.Oo 3.40 HCS: Lnsianalized intersections Release 2.1e rage 2 -------------- Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street N6 SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflict:ina Flows: (vph) 367 254 Potential Capacity: (pcphj YD2 iD3V Movement Capacity: (Pcoh) 9D2 i030 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.99 0.97 Step L - from Major' ----- t_____________W6____-______c6 Str ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 7G-4 504 Potential Capacizv: (Pcoh) - 692 914 Movement Capacity: (Pcph) 692 914 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.97 0.9i intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Gueue Approach Rate Cap :ao Delav Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec%veh) ______ (veh) _______ _______ _____ (secjveh) _____4_V_ ______ ______ N6 R 12 902 4.0 0.0 A. 3.6 56 R 35 1030 3.6 0.0 A EB L di 914 4.3 0.2 A 0.4 WB L 23 692 5.4 0.0 B 0.2 intersection Delav = 0.4 seciveh HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.ie Page Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Kmart/Spradley Barr (E-W) Drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (mini Analyst... jmd Date of Analysis.......... 1/12/96 Other information......... am 19p8 short long bk'grd otal Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L R L T K 1 L R --- --- --- 1 ---- -- --- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- --- No. Lanes i 2 < 0 i < 0 0 1 < 0 0 I i Stop/Yield N; N1 Volumes 170 705 15; 20 963 95; 5 t 20; 30 t 165 PHF .95 .95. .95I .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95 Graae 0 0 0 MC's (%) SUiRV's (%)� CV's (%) PCE's 11.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tq) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 .io Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 ihrough Traffic Minor- Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: 'Onsigna iized intersections Release 2-le Fage 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step is RT from Elinor Street Na SB Conflictinq Flows: (vph) 379 526 Potential I, apacity: (pcph) 690 750 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 890 %5U Prob. of Vueue-Free Staie: 0.97 0.ii Major5tret______________6 StepL LT-f r--- ___________ -6 -- -- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 758 i051 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 672 468 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 672 466 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.9'• 0.56 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB _--__--- SB ----------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2001 i959 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 74 ro Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.56 0.56 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 41 44 Prob. of Queue -Free State:-- 0_96 __-- 0_98 - - ------ - ----------- -- --_-__-- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB _-.______________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1902 1944 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 64 of Major- LT, Minor TH impedance Factor: 0-55 0.55 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.64 0.64 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements U.46 0.63 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 29 38 intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate cap cap Delay Length LDS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (peph)(sec/veh) ______ ______ (yen) _______ _______ (,secjveh) _____ _________ ________ ______ NB L 6 29 . NB T 1 41 > 117 41.3 i.i E NB R 23 690 > ;B L 35 36 > 36 452.1 5.6 F SB T 1 44 . 70.6 R 215 i JU 6.7 1 .4 b E6 i_ 197 465 13.3 _.4 C 1.5 wP L 23 671 5.J '1 .0 w 0,1 intersectiJn Delay see/ven Hi'.S: Unsicnaiized intersections Release 2-le "rage Center For Microcomputers in TranspOrta Cion University of Florida 5i2 Weil Hail Gainesville. FL 32611-2083 Ph: r904j 392-0378 Streets: (N-5) limart/Spraciley Barr (E-W) Vrake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) .Ana l_yst... ............. jmd Date of Analysis......... 17i2 j 98 Other information......_. �0pm 1998 snort `Ion bicgrd total Iwo -way Stop -control -led intersection Eastbound We_+bound Northbound i Southbound ' L T P L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ; --- --- --- --- ---- -- ---- ---- --- No. Lanes 1 2 < u i < u u > 1 < u 0 1 i Stop/yield N: NI Volumes 70 687 10! 20 453 30; 1 i 10 5 1 30 PHF .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95 Grade u u u u MC's St1/RV's (%) I CV" s (%} PCE's 11.10 1. iG 1.10 1.10 1.10 ;1.i0 1.io i.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (to) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.io Riaht Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 "nrough ira ff is Minor Road 5.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.60 3.40 HCS: Unsionaiized intersections Release 2.ie rase 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection ------------------------------------------ Step 1: RT from Minor- Street ------------- NB 58 -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (yph) 567 L54 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 90Z i030 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 902 1U3V Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.99 0.l7 --------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major- Street WB _____ -- _-E5 ------------------------------------------ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 754 509 Potential Capacity: (peph) 692 914 Movement capacity: (papa) 69! 9i4 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.97 u.9i -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NO Sc __________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1332 1322 Potential Capacity: (peps) ibi 164 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.66 0.66 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 159 162 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.99 - --------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 130i i3io Potential Capacity: (pcph) i56 154 Major LT, Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.88 0.88 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.90 0.90 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.87 0.89 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 136 137 intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Vital Queue Approach Rate Cap cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (Peph)(sec/ven) ______ ______ ______ (ven) _______ _______ (sec/ven) _____ --------- ________ NB L i 136 > Na T i i59 > 520 7.1 0.6 a 7.1 NB P 12 902 > SB L 6 137 > 140 27.1 0.0 0 p T i i62 > 7.5 �B d 35 iO3u 3.6 u.0 A E6 L 61 914 4.3 u.2 A u.4 5.4 1nYer5ecL�pn Velay = V.b _ec/v?n I 11 APPENDIX E 11 I1 1 I 1 i i 1 HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2-le Page Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville, FL 3261i-2083 Ph: (904') 392-0376 Streets (N-S) Jiffy Lube (E-W) Drake ina jor Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ... ............. jmd Date of Analysis.......... 1/12/96 Other- information ..... ....am(Em 1998 sh ori- long bkgrd ota' Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound 'Southbound L R L T R L R L T R . ____ ____ ____;____ ____ _-__---- ____ ____ No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 <. 0 0 0 D 0 0 i Stop/yield N; N Volumes 6i5 786 35; c PHF .95 .95 .95155 Grade 0 0 iu MC's (%) SU/RV's (%); CV's (%) PCE's _________---__________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Cr-iticai Foliow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Throuqh Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left turn Minor Road 7-00 3.40 HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.1e Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection ________________________________________________________ S t:ep 1: RT from Minor Street NB 3B ________________________________________________________ Conflicting 'Flows: (vph) a32 Potential Capacitv: (pcph) 836 Movement Capacitv: (pcph) 836 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: ________________________________________________________ 0-9c Intersection Performance Summary Avq. 95% Flow Move Shared Totai Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) _-_-- ------ ------ ------- ------- (sec/veh) --------- -------- ------ 4-3 SB R 6 836 4.3 0.0 A intersection Delay = 0.0 sec/veh = = = M = = = M a = M ft = = = = M � M HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.1e Page Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-5) jiffy Lube rE-W) Drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed.._ 60 (min) Anaivst................... .Jmd Date of Analysis.......... 1/12/96 Other information...... Ai pm 1996 ^norT lono bkord CJta Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Sou thbound L T R L F< L I F+ L T R !__-_ ---- -___ ____�____ ____ ____!____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ---- No. Lanes ! 0 2 0 ! 0 2 -: 0 ! 0 0 0 0 0 i Stop/Yield N! N1 Volumes 574 ! 387 25; 5 PHF .95 .95 .95! .95 Grade 0 0 u Mc's (%) C'V' (%) PCE?s r 1.1D _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Cap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.i0 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 '.3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.ie Page 2 ------------ Worksheet for- TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step I: PT from Minor Street N6 56 ________________________________________________________ Confiicting Flows: (,Ph) 216 Potential capacity: (pcph) i076 Movement capacity: (pcph) i076 Prob. of Oueue-Free Mate: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.9Y intersection Performance Summary AVQ. 95% Flow Move Shared Totai Oueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) _ --------- ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _____ 3-4 S5 R 6 1076 3.4 0.0 A intersection Delay = 0.0 sec%veh � == M = = = M M M r r r= r= M G M HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.ie rage 1 Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville. FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets (N-S) KmartiSpradley Barr lE-W) Drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time analyzed... 60 (min( Anai vs ... ............. jmd Date? of Analysis.......... 1i12i90- Other information...... ..am pm iCi98,, long bkgrd tot, Two-way Stop -controlled intersether ion Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T P L T R L T R L T R ___- _____ ____________ ____ ---- No- Lanes 1 2 0 [< 0 0> i < 0 ; 0 > i i Stop/field N; N 'volumes 160 573 10; 20 732 80; 5 i 15; 55 i i8o PHF .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .93 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) Cv's (%) PCE?s ;i.io 1i.10 ;1.10 i.io i.l0;i.10 i.io i.10 ___________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Cr iticai Follow-up Maneuver Gap (to) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Riant Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Throuah Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsionalized intersections Release 2.1e Page Worksheet for TWSC intersection --------- _______________________________________________ Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 307 428 Potential Capacity: (PcPh) 968 640 Movement Capacity: (Pcph) 966 840 Prob. of Dueue-free State: 0.96 0.75 Step 2_Litree4______________6 E6 -From -Major ___ - - Conflicting Flows: (vph) ___________ 614 655 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1303 596 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 803 596 Prob.. of uueue-Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street N6 S6 _____________________________________ conflicting Flows: (vph) i652 1616 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 118 124 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.67 0.67 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 79 83 Prob. of Oueue-Free State:_ _____ 0_-__-____99 0_99 __.________________________ Step 4: LT from Minor Street N6 56 ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1570 1606 Potential Capacity: (pcph) i05 100 Major LT. Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.66 0.66 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.74 0.74 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.55 0.72 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 58 72 intersection Performance Summary Avg.95e Flow Move Shared Total Clueue Approach Rate Cap cap Delay Length LGS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(see%veh) _ _____ (vein) ___ (sec%veh) ________ ______ NB L 6 56 > NB T i 79 > 186 22.4 0.5 0 22.4 NB R i6 966 % SB L 64 72 > 72 260.7 7.4 F S6 T i 63 : 66.2 3B R .68 840 3.11 i.i 6 to L 185 596 8.a I.3 6 1.9 WB L 603 4.^ 0. 0 A 0 l intersection Daiay = 9.6 sec/veh s =.= ==== W = = m m m m== m m m HCS: Unsignalized intersections Release 2.le rage i HcS: Unsignaiized intersec bens _ Release c. ie _ rage 2 Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida WOri[sneet for IWSC intersection 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2063 Step I: i<i from ifinor Street No Ph: jy04) .392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Kmar-t/Spradlev Barr (E-W) drake Conflicting Flouts: (VPn) 296 206 Street Direction.... EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 976 1G6y Major Movement Capacity: (pcph) y76 iG89 Length of Time Analyzed ... 60 (min) Prob. Oueu -Mate: i). 99 0.96 Ana iv_ s t--- ....... .... .jrnd of e-Free ))ate of Analysis.......... 1112i96 ut:her information......., ern pm 1998 fz r long bkgrd 1_.ta" -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT From Major Street W6 _ - ---E6 Two-way Stop -controlled intersection ________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (,ph) Sys 4i1 Eastbound Wastbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 822 1031 R; I_ � R ', L R L K Movement Capacity: !pcph) 622 1D31 L ____ -___ __-_---- _-__ __-_ ---- ---_ _-__ Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.96 0.9i No. Lanes 1 2< 0 i 2< 0 0> i < 0 0> 1 1 __________________________________________________ Step 3: TH from Minor Street Na :38 Stopi'fiela i N; N; Volumes ; 80 555 i0; 15 366 25; i i i0; 30 i 40PHFd Flows: I100 i093 .951 .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95� .95 .95 .95 Conflicting t'apn) Gra .y5 .50 0 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (Pcpn) 246 250 MC's MC's (%) Capacity Adjustment Factor SU/R'V's (%); due to impeding Movements 0.89 0.65 C V's (%) ; Movement Capacity: (pcph) 221 223 PCE's 11.10 ;1.10 ;1.i0 1.i0 1.10;i.10 i_i0 '1.10 Prob. of Queue -Free Mate: ---------- i.00 -- -------------- i.00 -------- ------------ ------------ ---------------------------------------- --------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street N6 56 ________________________________________________________ Conf i-icting Flows: (vph) 1073 1062 Adjustment Factors Potential Capacity: (pcph) 218 215 Major LT, i9inor TH . Vehicle Critical Follow-up Impedance Factor: 0.89 0.89 Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.9i 0.91 __________________________________________________________________ capacity Adjustment Factor Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 due to Impeding Movements 0.87 0.90 Right Turn Minor Road 5.30 2.60 Movement Capacity: (pcph) i9i 194 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 ________________________________________________________ Left turn Minor Road 7.-DO 3.4t) p intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total uueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Lengtn i_u. Delay Movement !pcph) (pcph) (peph)(seciveh) ______,______ teen) ------- (sec/veh) ________ ______ NB L i 191 N6 T i 221 > 635 5.8 0.0 B 5.6 N6 R i2 976 . SB L 35 194 , i95 22.6 0.7 u SB T 1 223 ii.b S6 R 46 I089 3.5 0.0 A. cB L "C i031 _.5 tJ.2 A U.5 11'It Gf'=-e':LIJIUe la`/ = 1 SCC /YCn 1 i 1 APPENDIX D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I M M mm==MM W w m= W= M ,A M! HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.1e Page Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville, FL 326ii-2083 Ph: 1904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Jiffv Lube (E-W) Drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Anaivzed... 60 (min) Anaivst................... jmd Date of Analvsis...... .--- ji12i95 Other Information......... aM pm `nort 199acsiong,dkar total Two-wav Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound 'Westbound I Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R --- -_- -- No. Lanes 0 [00 2< 0 ( 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N; N Volumes 606 798 5: a PHF .95 I .95 .95: 1 .95 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SUiR'V's (A)! CV's (�+1 PCE's 1.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Cr-i tical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 KCS: Unsignaiized intersections Reiease 2_ie Paae Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step l: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 422 Potential Capacity: 1pcphj 846 Movement Capacity: ;Pepin) 846 Prob. of Vueue-Free State: 0.99 ________________________________________________________ intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Oueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec%veh) (veh)- _ -- (secjveh) 4.3 56 R 6 846 4.3 0.0 A intersection Delay = 0.0 secjveh HCS: Unsignaiized Intersections Release 2.ie Page Center- For- Mier-ocomputer-5 in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0376 Streets: (N-S) Jiffv Lube (E-W) Drake Major Btreet Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (niin) And lvst... .jma Date of Analysis......... u t:.h er Information... .. .am pm 1998 :ShZr' ionstot,91 TwO-wav Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Sou thb ound L T R L T R 1 L T R L T R ---- ____ __-_ ____ ____ ____ ____ ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 i Stop/Yield N; NI Volumes 573 393 5: 5 PHF .95 .95 .95I .95 rr-ade 0 D 0 MC's SU7RV`s (%)I CV',= (%) 1.i0 PCE's' _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Fo ilow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Throuqh Traffic Minor Road 6.50 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: ilnsignalized intersections release 2.1e Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------- ----------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB Se. ________________________________________________________ Conflictina Flows: (-,ph) _i0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1064 Movement: I.apacity: 1pcphl 1084 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0-99 intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Vueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Ceiav Movement (p_pn) (pcph) (p_ph)(sec%veh) tveh)- ---_- (sec/veh) SB R 6 1D84 3.3 D.0 A 3.a intersection Delav = 0.0 sec%veh W M WIM= M M W M I' M 1M M M M °m M! M HCS: Onsianalized intersections Release 2.ie rage I Center For Microcomputers in transportation University of Florida 5i2 Weil Hail Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 "Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Kmart/Spradley Barr (E-W') Drake Major Street Direction.... EW _ength of Time Analyzed... 60 (min,' Analyst ... ............. jmd Date of A.nalysis.......... 1/12/96 Other information.........am pm i495 shor long bF.ari total Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L R L I R L T R -_ -------_---- ____ ____ ____ _______ ___ ` No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 [ : G 0 1 - G 0 i I Stop/yield N; N 'volumes 140 532 i0� 20 744 751 5 1 i5; 25 i i55 PHF .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .95 Grade G 0 G 0 MC's (%1 Sij/RV's (%); C'V's (%) PCE's i.i0 ;1.iG I1. iG i.iG i. iGi i. iO 1.io i.i0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor- Road 7.130 3.40 HCS: Unsionalized intersections Release 2.ie Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- S l:eo RT from Minor- Street No 56 Confli:t.ing Flows: (Vph) 312 431 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 962 6.57 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 962 637 Proo. or Queue -Free State: 0.98 0.79 Stec ----- from Street-------------w6 t6 Confli:t'ing -----Major Flows: (vph) -----______ 624 662 Potent -al Capacity: (pcph) 793 591 Movement .aoacity: (pcph) 793 591 Proo. if vueua-rree Jtate: 0.97 0.73 -------------------------------------------------------- Step .. Td from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Confii:ting Flows: (vph) 1648 i6i4 P oten t':dl Capacity: (pcph) s 124 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.70 0.70 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 83 87 Proo. of Oueue-Free State: 0.99 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street N6 S6 -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) i570 1604 "Potential Capacity: (pcph) 105 100 Major LT, Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.70 0.70 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.77 0.76 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.60 0.15 Movement -------------------------------------------------------- Capacity: (pcph) 63 75 intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total rfueue Approach Rate Cap cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (Pcph)(sec%veh) ------ ------ ------ (veh) ------- ------- Isec/ ven ----- --------- -------- N6 L 6 63 > N6 T 1 83 > 198 20.8 0.4 D 20.8 N6 R i8 962 > SB L 29 75 > 75 7g.1 1.9 F 56 T 1 87 - i6.0 zle. R i 7 9 637 5.5 0.9 O E6 _ i62 591 8.4 i.3 6 1.6 23 7`_r3 a17U 0 A l�-1 loterse_tion Ueiav = c.6 sec/veh HCS: Unsianaiized intersections Release 2.1e Page Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville. FL 326ii-2063 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Kmart%Spradley Barr (E-W) Drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 imin) Analvst... jmd Date of Analysis........ I/12/98 Other information........ �Pm 1998 -hor ionq k r' total Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westboun7 Northbound Southbouna L I R L T R L IK i_ T R ____ ____ No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 , 1 2 0 ( 0 > 1 0 0 > i Stop/field 1 NI NI Volumes 60 564 i0I 15 372 25; 1 i 10; 5 i 25 PHF .05 .95 .95� .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .95: -95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/R'V's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ;1.i0 i.iG ;i.10 i-ic) 1.10l1.10 1.io i.iG ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Cr iticai Follow-up Maneuver bap (tq) Time (tf) ------------ ______________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.i0 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6-50 3.30 Left Turn Minor- Road 7-00 3.40 HCS: Unsianaiized intersections Release 2.1e Paae 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 302 209 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 97_ i085 Movement Capacity: (Pcph) :'73 IGOS Prob. of Oueue-free State: G.99 0.97 Step - Major ______-____ E6 -Street -_____---- _____________W6 Conflicting Flows: (vPhj 605 4iO Potential apacity: (pcph) 612 1023 Movement Capacity: kPCphl 612 1023 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.98 0.93 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB 50 __________________________________________f_-_______-___ Conflicting Flows: (vph) i096 i089 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 249 252 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements O.9i 0.91 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 227 230 Prob. of Vueue-Free State:-- ',.Do --Go i_00 -------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street --- NB SE ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1071 1076 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 219 217 Major LT, Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.91 0.9i Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.93 0.93 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to imoedinq Movements O.90 0.92 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ i98 199 Intersection Performance Summary Ava. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Oueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (peph)(sec/veh) ______ (vest) _______ _______ (seC/veh) _____ ________- ________ ______ ______ NB L i i9d > NE T i 227 > 643 5.7 0.0 B 5.7 NB R i2 973 > SB L 6 199 203 18.4 0-0 C SB T i 2S0 > 6.3 SB R 29 iGd5 3.4 0-0 A E6 L 69 1023 6 O.i 0 4 4. I intersection Driev = G.5 sec/veh I APPENDIX C 11 11 I. S. I I it Al UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Intersection Total Delay = (Vehicle T'otalDelay x Volume) _ 1Volumc Level -of -Service (Intersection) _ Level -of -Service Average Total Delay, sec/velt A <_5 $ >5arid 510 C > 10 and 5 20 D >20and _530 E > 30 and 5 45 F > 45 =r r omen M ww�wtin omen w owswoms w; "Mm HCS: Unsianaiized intersections Release "[.le Paae Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville. FL 326ii-2083 Ph: (904) 392-G378 Streets (N-S) Jiffy Lube (E-W) Drake Minor Street Direction.... F_W Lengi:h of Time Analyzed.. - 60 (min) Ana i ys t................... jmd Date of Analysis..........%1(i4 Other Information......... am <Z i99a short lono bkgrd 'total Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Sou t:h bound L R L T R L T R I L T R No. Lanes 0 2 0 i 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/fieid N: N Volumes 593 ' 783 i; 2 PHF .95 .95 .95; .95 Grade 0 0 0 SUjRV's {%j; CV's (%) PCE's i. i0 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (to) Time (if) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.G0 3.40 HC Ilnsionalized intersections Release 2.1e Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step I: RT from Minor street NB od ________________________________________________________ Conflictinq Flows: (vph) 412 Potential Capacity: ipcph) 856 Movement apacity: (pcph) 856 Pr-ob. of Queue -Free State: i.00 -------------------------------------------------------- intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Vueue Approach Rate Gap cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec%veh) (veh) (sec%veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ _____ _________ 4.2 S5 R _ 650 4.2 0.0 A Intersection Delay = 0.0 sec/veh Page 2 Ow M As MW t Ow to " Va 00 M w Mr in < The calculated value was greater than 999.9. HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.ie rage Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Well Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: !904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-5) Jiffv Lube (E-W) Crake Major- Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Ana 1vst............... imp uate of Analysis.......... i/12i9 Other information ------ ..,a'�pm 19d9short-long bkgrd toiai Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound SOUthbOUnd (. T R L T R L T R L T R ___ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____--------- _-__ ____ -__- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 u 0 0 1 Stop%Yield N1 N Volumes 5oi 389 i; 1 PHF .95 .95 .95j .95 Grade u u 0 MC' %) SU/RV's (%); CV's PCF_'s 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Fo 11ow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 11.io Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left i urn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.ie rage 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: 4<T from Minor Street NB Sn ________________________________________________________ conflicting Flows: (voh) 205 Potential Capacity: (PcPh') logo Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1090 Prom. of OUeue-Free ------------------------------------------------- State: 1.00 intersection Performance Summary Avg . 95% Flow Move Shared Total vueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delav Length LOS Del a Movement (pcph) (pcph) (peph)(sacjveh) (veh) (secjveh) 3.3 S6 R 1 1090 3.3 0.0 A intersection Delay = 0.0 sec%veh HCS: Unsigrlaiized intersections Release 2.1e Page i Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hal Gainesville, FL 32611-286z, Ph: t904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) KmartjSoradley Barr (C-W) Drake Major ::treat direction.... cW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst... ..... jmd Date of Analysis.......... lj i2i96 Other- information,-. .. ..am pm 199 short long bkard total Two-way Stop-controlied Inters-c.ion Eastbound Westbound Nor-thb ound -outhbolrnd L T R ; L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 i 2 < 0 0 , 1 0 I u > 1 i Stop .''Y i e id NI N� Volumes 137 569 it; i% 728 75: 3 i 9; 23 i 15u PHF .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC (%) SU1RV's Cv's (%) PCc's i. i0 i.iu i.i0 i.i0 i. iu; i.-i0 1.10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical roiiow-up Maneuver bap (tg) Time (tf) ------------ _--------------- Left Turn Major ______________________________________ Road 5.50 2-10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 .3.30 Left Turn Minor- Road 7.00 _i-40 HCS: Unsianalized Intersections Release 2.1e Worksheet for T'ASC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step is RT from Minor Street N6 56 Confiictinq Flows: (vph) 306 422 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 969 846 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 969 346 Prob. of Oueue-rree State: 0.99 0.719 --------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street W6 C6 --- ------------------------------------- Confiictinq Flows: (vph) 611 645 Potential Capacity: (pcph) doff 603 Movement Caoacity: (pcph) 806 603 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.98 0.74 -------------------------------------------------------- Step "d: TH from Minor Street NB S6 __________________________________________L_____________ Confiictinq Flows: (vph) 1oi2 1578 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 124 130 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0-72 0.72 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 39 q4 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: -_---- --------- 0.990.99 _________________________________ Step 4: LT from Minor Street N5 So ________________________________________________________ Confiictinq Flows: (vph) 1533 1568 Potential capacity: (pcph) ill i00 Major- LT. Minor- TH Impedance Factor: 0.71 0.71 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0-78 0.78 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements u.62 0.77 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 69 di intersection Performance Summary Ava. 95% FIO. Move :hared Total Oueue approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcpn)(sec%veh) ______ ______ (veh) _______ _______ (sec%veh) _____ --------- ________ ______ NB L 3 69 > N6 T i 89 > 215 i7.9 0.i C i7.9 N6 R 10 969 > 56 L 26 ai > 81 66.5 1.5 F S6 T 1 94 i3.6 SB R 174 846 5.4 ir.4 B F_6 L i56 603 8.1 1.2 6 1.5 W6 L 20 606 4.6 U.0 A intcr'secti,,, Uelav = 2.Z :te e i'/veh Paae am "W low am Mm vim HCS: Unsionalizeo intersections Release 2.je Page Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville. FL S26i1-20e? Ph: (904) 392-O378 Streets: (N-5) Kmartj5pracilev Harr (E-W) Drake Major Street Direction..._ EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... jmd Date of Analysis.......... 11'12198 Other information.._...... pm 99a port long bkgrd total Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 1 L F R L r R L T R L 1 H i---- ____ ____i____ ____ -___ ____ ____ No. Lanes i i 2 < 0 1 2 < O ; 0 > i < 0 ; u > 1 i stop/Yield N; N; 'volumes 1 58 554 7; 16 365 241 i i 9: 3 1 22 PHr .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 u 0 MC's (%) SUjRV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ;1.10 ;).i0 ;1.10 i.io 1.10;i.lO i.10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ______________________________________________________________^___ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.iu Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor- Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignaiized intersections Release 2.le Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection --------------------------------------------------------- Step is RT from Minor Street NB Se Conflicting Flows: (vph) 295 204 Potential Capacity: ;pcphj 96i i091 Movement: Capacity: (.PCPh) 98i i(391 Prob. of Dueue-Free State: O.99 0.98 ------------------------------------------------------ Step 2: LT from Major Street Wo Ee _____---________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: tvph) 590 409 Potential i;apaeity: (pcph) 827 i034 Movement .,aoacity: (pcph) 827 i034 Prob- oT kjupue-Free State: 0.�3 0-94 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street No >a ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1074 i064 Potential capacity: (pcph) 257 260 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.9i 0.91 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 235 238 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 1.00 1.00 --------- ---------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor- Street No So ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1046 1058 Potential capacity: (pcph) 226 223 Major LT, Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.91 0.91 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.93 0.93 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.9i 0.92 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 206 205 intersection Performance Summary A:a. 95% Flow Move Sharea Total cueue Approach (fate Cap Uap veiny Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (Pcpn)(sec/veh) ______ (veh) _______ _______ (secjveh) _____ _________ ________ ______ ______ NR L i 206 > NB T i 235 > 622 p. _+ 0.0 E. 5.9 No R i0 98i > So L 3 205 > "t 12 i7.3 0.a C SE i 238 > 5.5 Se R t5 1091.4 0.0 A Eo L 67 i034 .. .. 0.I 4 0.3 WE. i_ i9 827 4.5 0.0 4 C..2 In tc.,-sec lien Uai = 0.5 SCC/van APPENDIX B i� r r r� r r r i r r r r r_ r �� ■ _r MATTHEW J. DELICH , P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Observer r0 INTERSECTION OF SPR TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE Bate / g g 2 Day'7/94; /1/%l� City eti AA c AND Dkd K � EY bky? �l� �h AT COUNTS BT COL g:-�s R Rigrtt turn S _ -Leftturn L BEGINSI koi4R7 SP,QA,1cEy sxk,( NormOTA I S*u"' 16Rr'?/K ; %;<Akc _ TOTAL TOTAL trom NORTH I from SOUTH ( tram EAST trom WES � R I S I L I Total II R I S I L I TOW I R I S I L I Tote) II R I S I L I TOW 1 730 II s l o / I 6 Il i i o 1 0 1 II Ii s' 11191.3 1 /.16 11 ! 1 / 71 71 /15 113 / 11-3a9 -745 II y I 0 1 0 1 -/ II = 1 0 1 O 1 II 7 II 6 Irs91 5 11 s 11 130/11s13 I Ily g 7 II v yti loo 11 61 o 1 01 6 11a I ,o 10 l a II 11 5 1/701511k011'-1 I J61171a371141 1711ya5 715- 11 7 1 0 1 I II t o 10. I II it II 7 116a1 3 1 t -7q II o 1�,171 171;�3 6 11 a Ilya 3 II I I II I I i II II I I I it I I I II fi 730-03011 I�L 1 0 1 3 1 X6 11 1 0 1 0 1 9 11 11 �,y 16 01 1616 of 7 11 7 17 a315 , 19 3 9 1116 3 7 111 C 7/ II i I I it I I I II II i I I II I I i fl II II I I I II I I I II II I I I II I I I II II II I I i II I I I II II I I I II I I I II II II I I I II I I i II II 1 I I II I I I II it II I I I II I I I II II I I i it I I I II II II i I I II I I I II II I I I II I I I II II it I I I II I I I it fl I I I II I I I II II y30 11371 / 1 6 Iyy 11y 1 0 1 11 S II y7 11191,1,751 31).9611 1/ 7v l),q I Xag 115a4/11573 qy5 I1a.61 0 1 3 1a7 113 1 0 1 GI 3 11 31-1 - IIr),/13071013az 110 11,39la.g1267115q 511 6 x7 ion IISII 0 I 160 115 1 0 1 0 1 5 11 65 11�3131F1 7 13y� 11 3 1).cy136130q 11656 11 7 )-1 fPS 11- 61 0 5 1 y! 113 1 0 1 A, 1 5 11 y 6' 11/3 131 1 7 133: 11 3 Iaygly31a?q 116 X 7 II 6 7 3 II I I 1 II i i 1 II II I I I II I I I II II u?G S oII156I 1 Ia3 I17y II/� I J 13 i /� II / ? (: �75I1d1 %) 17I/305 11 // Iiy9I13711077 II�</OovZII�Si`i ', r-, �J APPENDIX A II t] VII. COI•dCLUSIONS This study assessed the potential impacts of constructing the Fuller Texaco on Drake Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. As a result of the analysis, the following conclusions were drawn: The potential impacts of the proposed project were evaluated at the following intersections: Drake/K-mart/Spradley Barr and Drake/Jiffy Lube. - The traffic impact analyses were performed for existing conditions and future Years 2000 and 2020. Future background traffic conditions without the project and total traffic conditions, with completion of the proposed. project, were evaluated. . - Under existing conditions, each of the study intersections is currently operating at an acceptable level of service, except ' for minor southbound left turns at the Drake/K-mast/Spradley Barr. intersection. However, the calculated level of service for this movement is normal along arterial streets. ' - For Year 2000 background and total traffic, conditions, the int ersections tersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service, except for minor street southbound left turns. These ' movements do have alternative routes through other intersections that do not require this left turn. - For Year 2020 future background and total traffic conditions, the study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service, except for minor southbound left turns at the Drake/K-mart/Spradley Barr. intersection. These left ' turns can conveniently go to a College/K-mart access. It is likely that sometime between the short range and long range futures, that - this intersection will be restricted to right-in/right-out/left- ' in. - Pedestrian access to and from the proposed Fuller Texaco is/will be direct and continuous. Pedestrian level of service will be acceptable. For crossings at the Drake/College intersection or Drake Road itself, the level of service will not be. in the T3 category. Bicycle level of service will be acceptable. It is ' anticipated that the transit level of service will be acceptable in the future. �J 1 1 20 Table 5 Year 2020 Peak Hour Background Traffic Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Drake/K-mart/Spradley Barr (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT (RT) B (A) E (A) SB LT/T D F SB RT A (A) B (B) EB LT A (A) C (c) WB LT B (B) B (B) Overall A (A) B (A) Drake/Jiffy Lube (stop sign) SB RT A A Overall A A ( ) Right-in/Right_-out/Left-in Table 6 Year 2020 Peak Hour Total Traffic Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Drake/K-mart/Spradley Barr (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT (RT) B (A) F (A) SB LT/T E F SB RT A (A) B (B) EB LT A (A) C (C) WB LT B (B) B (B) Overall A (A) F (A) Drake/Jiffy Lube (stop sign) SB RT A A Overall A A ( ) Right-in/Right-out/Left-in 18 K-Mart /7/77/77/7777 Site /r— DRAKE Spradley Barr Jiffy Lube —_ - Denotes Lane N SHORT RANGE GEOMETRY Figure 10 K-Mart N /inni77/7 Site DRAKE Spradley Barr Jiffy Lube - Denotes Lane LONG RANGE GEOMETRY 17 Figure 11 Table 3 Year 2000 Peak Hour Background Traffic Operation Level of Service Intersection AM FM Drake/K-mart/Spradley Barr (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT B D SB LT/T C F SB RT A B EB LT A B WB LT A A Overall A A Drake/Jiffy Lube (stop sign) SB RT A A Overall A A Table 4 Year 2000 Peak Hour Total Traffic Operation Intersection Drake/K-rnart/Spradley Barr (stop sign) NB LT/T/R.T SE! LT/T SB RT EB LT WB LT Overall Drake/Jiffy Lube (stop sign) SB RT Overall. 16 bevel of Service AM PM B D D F A B A B A A A B A A A A ' VI. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The previous chapter described the development of future traffic forecasts both with and without the proposed project. ' Intersection capacity analyses are conducted in this chapter for both scenarios to assess the potential impact of the proposed project -generated traffic on the local street system. Traffic Analysis - Year 2000 The peak hour background and total traffic volumes for Year 2000, i.11ustra.ted. on Figures 6 and. R, respectively, were analyzed to determine the intersection delay and corresponding level of service. Tables 3 and 4 summarize the results for the respective Year 2000 background and total traffic conditions. The level of service worksheets for Year 2000 background. and total traffic conditions are provided in Appendix C and. Ii, respectively. As indicated in Tables 3 and 4, the traffic movements at each of the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable level of service under fu.tu.re traffic conditions for Year 2000, except for minor street southbound left turns. This is normal at intersections along arterial streets during the peak hours. The short range intersection geometry is depicted on Figure 10. ' Traffic Analysis - Year 2020 ' The Year 2020 peak hour traffic volumes for background and total traffic conditions were analyzed to determine the intersection delay and corresponding level of service. Tables 5 ' and 6 summarize the results. Appendix E contains worksheets for Year 2020 background conditions and Appendix F for Year 2020 total traffic conditions. The level of service analyses shown in Tables 5 and 6 indicate that the study intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service, except for the afternoon total peak hour traffic at the Drake/K-mart/Spradley Barr intersection. These left turns do have convenient alternative access to College at ' other K-mart accesses. Elimination of the minor street left turns achieves acceptable level of service. The long range intersection geometry is depicted on Figure 11. Pedestrian Level of Service The study area for pedestrians is, by definition, destinations which are within 1320 feet of the site. This area is shown in Appendix G. There are three existing areas that would qualify as a destination for this commercial. site. The site itself falls into the "Activity Corridor." The site will be connected to existing and future sidewalks on Drake Road. West of the railroad tracks, 1.5 I I I 7 J I I u II K-Mart N /77,77r77/7777 Site Jiffy A Lube 25/80 'CC/LULL/11LC/1/� -�- 610/1220 LO �- 25/35 15/20 DRAKE ) f 645/1310 80/160 --O� � } r 925/955 o ::g Ln 10/10 o z o Spradley Barr 965/1025 AM/PM Rounded to the Nearest 5 Vehicles. SHORT RANGE TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8 K-Mart N /T/77/T/77TT Site I Jiffy Lube 0 0 o o - 30/95 'C!/LOLL/11LC/1/%Ln '") — 745/1485 LO 30/35 20/20 DRAKE ) 790/1 790/1595 -- - ---------- - -- - - 90/190 1170 1240 �- 1130 1160 -- up o / 10/15-,,. �zo AM/PM S radle Rounded to the Nearest P y 5 Vehicles. Barr LONG RANGE TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 9 V. FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 'The future total traffic projections reflect future traffic conditions with the traffic from the proposed Fuller Texaco project. The future total traffic projections were developed for Years 2000 and 2020. Total Traffic Year 2000 The total traffic for Year 2000 was developed by adding traffic from the proposed project to the background traffic_ for. Year 2000. The resulting peak hour total traffic. projections for Year 2000 are shown on Figure S. Total Traffic Year 2020 The total traffic for Year 2020 was developed by adding traffic from the proposed project to the background traffic for Year 2020. The resulting peak hour total traffic projections for ' Year 2020 are shown on Figure 9. I 1 13 0 o K-Mart LO o — 25/75 Lo z Ln -•— 620/1240 —15/20 60/140 940/970 - 10/10 Lp n z o Spradley Barr Tin/i7777 Jiffy Site Lube 'CC/1_/11 LL/11LL/1/% n DRAKE 5/5 -•— 655/1330 955/1010 �- N AM/PM Rounded to the Nearest 5 Vehicles. SHORT RANGE BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 K-Mart N 70 170 —� 1145/11175 10/15 /rin/i7777 Site 30/95 'CC/LULL/11LL/1�% — 755/1505 fir— 20/20 DRAKE CD zo Spradley Barr LONG RANGE BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Jiffy Lube LO Lo L 5/5 — 800/1615 1160/1225 AM/PM Rounded to the Nearest 6 Vehicles. Figure 7 12 IV. FUTIM E BACKGROUND TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS In order to properly evaluate the potential impact of the proposed. Fuller Texaco project on the local traffic conditions, . future traffic volumes were first estimated for the study area. without_ the project. These future forecasts reflect the growth that is expected from overall development in and near the City of Fort Collins and from proposed projects in the vicinity of the project site. Background Traffic Year 2000 The growth reflected in Year 2000 Background Traffic is based on area wide growth and development. Based upon historical traffic growth and information within the North Front Range Regional Transportation Flan, October 1994, it was determined that traffic .� within the study area has increased by approximately 1 percent per year. The peak hour background traffic for Year 2000 is depicted. on Figure 6. Background Traffic Year 2020 Future projections of background traffic for Year 2020 were developed by factoring the existing traffic_ to account for overall growth. An overall growth in traffic of approximately 1 percent annually was applied to the study intersections. The peak hour background traffic for Year 2020 is depicted on Figure 7. 1 I ' 11 I 2�%- K-Mart Spradley Barr /rirrrriTrrT/j Jiffy Site Lube DRAKE 1 + 5% ► TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4 K-Mart N C� N �- 2/2 Spradley Barr /77/7/ 7/77/7�j Site DRAKE PEAK HOUR SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Jiffy Lube - 22/32 AM/PM Figure 5 Land Use GasjC-store - 9 pumps (Rate) Table 2 Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak Trips Trips Trips in out 1225 43 42 (152.84) (5.43) (5.21) 9 F.M. Peak Trips Trips i.n out 53 53 (6.60) (6.60) Ey 0 0 COLLEGE AVENUE Q w a Kmert � SITE PLAN a Q W Y Q 10 "_ Z GALE Figure 3 8 I ' III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed site will be a gas/convenience store with 8 pumps. The project site, depicted. on Figure 3, is located west of College Avenue on the north side of Drake Road. Trip Generation Trip generation is important .in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information, prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (Trip_Generation, 6th Edition) was used to estimate trip generation. Table 2 shows the trip generation of the proposed. project. Land use code 846 (gas station plus convenience store and car wash) was Used. P.s indicated in the table, it is anticipated that the site would generate approximately: 1225 average daily trip ends, 85 morning peak hour trip ends, and 106 afternoon peak lour trip ends. pass-13y factor of 6, percent anct 66 percent !tive morning and afternoon peal: hours was applied to the gas/c-store trip generation. These pass -by adjustments are documented in .the February 1995 Update to Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE. Pass - by traffic does not affect the trip generation of a particular land use. It only affects the number of new trips that are added to the area street system. Trip Distribution The directional distribution of the remaining generated trips was determined for the Fuller Texaco. The distribution was determined based upon a gravity model process, in addition to analysis of the existing traffic patterns in the area and the type of uses proposed at the site. The trip distribution is provided on Figure 4. Pass -by trips were assigned based upon the directional distribution on Drake Road. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are I the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 5 shows the peak hour site generated. traffic for the proposed project. Figure 5 includes both the pass -by trips and the assigned trips. 1 7 I i ' of service is defined as level of. service D or better. These movements do have alternative routes that do not require this left turn. ' Pedestrian Facilities Currently, there are pedestrian facilities adjacent to and near the project site. There are sidewalks present along Drake Road. The widths of the sidewalks vary from 4 to 8 feet. Most sidewalks do not: conform to current Fort Collins standards. Bicycle Facilities There are bicycle lanes on Drake Road. These were included when the Drake/College intersection was recently improved. 11 Transit Facilities Transfort currently serves the study area with Routes 1 and J. Route 1 operates at 30 minute headways on College Avenue. Route 7 operates at 30 minute headways on Drake Road when CSU is in session. a 11 I I 5.1 I Table 1 Current Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM Pli Drake /K-mart,/SpradIey Barr (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT B C SB LT/T C F SB RT A B EB LT A B WB L•T A A Overall A A Drake,/Jiffy Lube (stop sign) SB RT A A Overall A A 5 N K-Mart Jiffy a Lube. 24 75 N o i N \ I0/0 r 609/1213 � + �, /-16/17 DRAKE - - 648/1305 58/137 --/ ) f r 935/987 -� 923/949 - � CD �n 7/11 �L o o m Spradley Barr AM/PM 11 RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the proposed Fuller Texaco is shown on Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are predominantly commercial. The topography within and ,surrounding the site is essentially flat. The site is located near the center of Fort Collins. Roads The primary street which will serve the proposed project: within the study area is Drake Roa.d. The intersections of Drake/K- mart/Spradley Barr and Drake/Jiffy Lube are currently stop sign controlled. The Drake/Jiffy Lube allows right-i.n/right-out movemerr .s . Drake Road is an east/west arterial street. Within the study area, Drake Road accommodates five travel lanes, two through lanes in each direction and a left turn lane at appropriate locations. There is additional widening approaching College Avenue. No parking is allowed on Drake Road. The speed limit is posted at 35 mph. Existing Motor. Vehicle Traffic Peak hour traffic flow at the key intersections is shown on Figure 2. The key intersections included in this study are: Drake/K-mart/Spradley Barr- and Drake/Jiffy Lube. Raw count data. is provide in Appendix A. Existing Motor Vehicle Operation Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 2 and the existing control, the Drake/K-mart/Spradley Barr and Drake/Jiffy Lube intersections operate as indicated in Table 1. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix B. Appendix B also describes level of service for unsignalized intersections as provided in the 1994 highway_ Capacity Manual. The Drake/K- mart/Spradley Barr intersection operates acceptably, except for southbound minor street left turns. These operate at level of service F. This type of operation is typical at stop sign controlled intersections along arterial streets. Acceptable level 2 �i u I I C I I. INTRODUCTION This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Fuller Texaco, located north of Drake Road and west of College Avenue. A scoping conversation was held in January, 1996. This transportation analysis addresses potential vehicular impacts upon the roadway system, the pedestrian network surrounding the study area, the bicycle system, and. the availability of transit facilities. Traffic: projections will be prepared for future Years 2000 and 2020. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planner (The Architect's Studio), the owner, and City staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins Transportation Impact Study Guidelines. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data.; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes and daily traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses for all pertinent modes of transportation. This report is prepared for the following purposes: - Evaluate the existing conditions; - Estimate the trip generation by the proposed/assumed developments; - Determine the trip distribution of site generated traffic; - Evaluate level of service; - Determine the geometrics at key intersections; - Determine the impacts of site generated traffic at key intersections. Information used in this report was obtained from the City of Fort Collins, the planning and engineering consultants, the developers, research sources (ITE, TRB, etc.), and field reconnaissance. 1 I LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 4 3. Site Plan ............................................ 8 4. Trip Distribution .................................... 10 5. Site Generated Traffic ............................... 10 6. Background Traffic Year 2000 ......................... 12 7. Background Traffic Year 2020 ......................... 12 B. Total Traffic Year 2000 .............................. 14 9. Total Traffic Year 2020 .............................. 14 10. Year 2000 Intersection Geometry ...................... 17 11. Year 2020 Intersection Geometry ...................... 17 APPENDIX A Recent Peak Hour Traffic B Current Peak Hour Operation/Description of Level of Service C Year 2000 Background Traffic Analyses D Year 2000 Total Traffic Analyses E Year 2020 Background Traffic Analyses F Year 2020 Total Traffic Analyses G Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Level of Service TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Roads................................................ 2 Existing Motor Vehicle Traffic ....................... 2 Existing Motor Vehicle Operation ..................... 2 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 6 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 6 Transit Facilities ................................... 6 III. Proposed Iievel.opment................................. 7 Trip Geri erat:ion....................................... 7 Trip Distribution .................................... 7 Trip Assi.onmerit...................................... "7 IV. Future Background .Traffic Projections ................ 11 Background Traffic Year 2000 ......................... 11 Background Traffic Year 2020 ......................... 11 V. Future Total Traffic Projections ..................... 1.3 Total Traffic Year 2000 .............................. 13 Total Traffic Year 2020 .............................. 13 VI. Traffic Impact Analysis .............................. 15 Traffic Analysis Year 2000 ........................... 15 Traffic Analysis Year 2020 ........................... 15 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 15 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 19 Transit Level of ;service ............................. 19 VII. Conclusions .......................................... 20 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Cul-rent Peak Hour Operation .......................... 5 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 9 3. Year, 2.000 peak Hour Background Traffic Operation ..... 16 4. Year 2000 Peak Hour. Total Traffic Operation .......... 16 5. Year 2020 Peak Hour Background Traffic Operation ..... 18 6. Year 2020 peak Hour Total Traffic Operation .......... 18 FULLER `IEXACO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY 1998 Prepared for: Pa. 1ph Fu.l1er C/O The Architect. Is. SH.idio 7.51 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Prepared by: MATTHE:W J. IiELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-:2061 FAX: 970-669-5034