HomeMy WebLinkAboutKMART PLAZA, FULLER'S TEXACO - PDP - 38-97A - CORRESPONDENCE - (6)REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: July 6, 1998 DEPT: Water/Wastewater
PROJECT: #38-97 Fuller's Texaco -Type II PDP/FC
All comments must be received by Leanne Harter no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, June 8,1998
-Correctly show location of 16-inch water main on landscape plan and provide the
required landscape separation distances.
-Provide 10 feet of utility easement on either side of the existing water mains.
-If proposed sanitary sewer service is not located in utility easement, then provide
offsite easement for service.
-See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Date: Signature: — -- --
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
X Plat X Site _ Drainage Report _Other
X Utility X Redline Utility X Landscape
Citv of Fort Collins
4. Indicate extent of the K-Mart Plaza sub -basin. Does all of this basin contribute to the
area inlet located just north of the site?
RESPONSE:
5. The usage of the pipe capacity nomograph to determine the capacity of the existing
pipe must account for the fact that the pipe is made of CMP. Please clarify all values that
are included in these calculations.
RESPONSE:
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments
1. Please clarify the location and purpose of the 7500 square feet of gravel base that is
part of the erosion/sediment control for this project.
RESPONSE:
Please refer to the redlined report and plans for additional review comments.
flrstex.doc
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: June 15, 1998 TO:
STORMWATER
UTILITY
PROJECT: #38-97 Fuller's Texaco - Type H PDP
All comments must be received by Leanne Harter no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, July 8,1998
1. Water quality treatment must be installed at the outlet from this site. Spill
containment was provided in the submittal but a water quality device must also be
installed.
RESPONSE:
2. Please state in report that Ralph Fuller, owner of proposed development owns the land
on the east and west side of the development therefore no easements need to be obtained
onsite or the west and east of the property. An easement is located to the north of the
site, please show this easement on the plat.
RESPONSE:
3. In the report it states that ponding will occur at the area inlet, it is unclear if this
ponding includes both onsite and offsite flow directed to that point.
RESPONSE:
c-�
Date: 13o I °� Signature:
Cc: M i Ke
U2ANN6 iiA21'k.Q
HERE 7 YOU TO RECEIVE COPIES OL/�rONS — ST-briaa.T AM o
v� D� Oiff Assoc. IN
_ �1°�*°!- City of Fort Collins
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 15, 1998 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: #38-97 Kmart Plaza, Fuller's Texaco = Type II - PDP
PLANNER: Leanne Harter
ENGINEER: Michael K. Dean, P.E.
All comments must be received by: July 8, 1998
Provide signed Easement Dedication documents with exhibits, when you have them
available, to be checked and approved by the City.
Provide a note on the site and Utility Plans stating, the access to West Drake Road will be
limited to Right In/ Right Out in the near future.
The site boundary shown in the T.I.S. does not match the Site Plan, revise the T.I.S..
Plot the turning radii and provide a scetch of how the tanker truck will access the site.
*** See redlines for additional comments.***
Date: Tv,d 90 1998 Signature:
CIfECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIESpF REVISIONS
,/Plat _✓Site Drainage Report Other To2N &k Rwo1j
Utility ./kedline Utility �andscape of TAwrcelt TRociC ,
'� bit l•l yZfy'}, �. 49`lC �/ + 5eaR f t' .��.k Pl`''Y
a -, i IAY' `` Yy .•#2A +.,`�4c�hr'
�� T
�Y.�;,�'i�� • �} �� a A
��vfi}
�
- �l�l
��!-; 1
-T MITI
i 11 ! ]AyjN )Ai1111 '1 i�1•gi 11 i !4 II(R/..A �A1 .ii 119y1'` Bt ii�.A i1121A1��w lijl llY.f`21d�' \� 111f,. 11:.
f!
. mm _. % • 1 ! 11 1• . 117{Jii;1'��'1-
-
t.i��—fir,'i�eli
ii kft1 !
Y
�1
�•'
�"Iw �ri y II i��`+l��llil®lfi�l'�J 1.v1ii.5 J'""R V_ �liq'lIR"r, "-�I�yV+' }������ �,���! T
TTw��
1
. � • 11 • 11 • / • 1 +fl � �+Eip�l a� � .+� V S' t ti.x "�' .✓ 1 -
< .
1196111t, l86PA;-w1 •11 !• 1 / • 11 1.1 • 11• 1Ito] i.�..�
y
13
LEM
K'aai_I . 1 _ e • 1 • _• 1 • 1 a t 71r. 1 w"rx;t
§r'
/Jirll�l�p/�111-1 F9•y
Vol
n
,.. `d11�,Nu•�'�fY �t4 HeSLLiIlM"`3 ri �
: 'rl'�41 Y. .�! You i'f4�L`r�! fir...
ky �rt'�u:.F �f 42�a a t�'A`
�Iv a - �A+.M. Y•.. �:'IAf
viuw.-wriV1l' x r
�
t
R
—r
PVC Ciass 160 128
..s� ,x,.17 29 . ,.f, 38 � , •59 86 ;a 2i
pblainLne PVC Class 200 I? h k4x',28 =361; 57 83 ' 123
Sch:40 �13 23 Q.. .32 52 t: 75
Pol ethyleneY Q t'35_
8
y,, w ,- 4.vw auu cnarc is mtenae As an nngauon aestgrt aid, related to the City'S water eonsetvahott sta[idardl
t' YL �,W.-':.q K'KP .o- [ �. nr"•K""'L r:. v 4 [
* t Imuts'the maximum velod qi ofmamlme pipe to 5.0 feet per secondand the maximum velocity of
<x yr r. , n, T • t
. + -s lateral pipe to 75 feet per second
'. y 1i.' • .SYv�1rp [�� • y � it
.�'/R." ;iN1 r 3rw .f"s' 3'"f r 3 �*c +,r g+�•[at•'-gr..r�1'sfyi .r[.
rKtix'
r�J 'L!"�,J47+r'�Y •��i 1].��Kq'� �i 7t � j O v' �'' `� ,
t '.} 7 t�" `Y i y?�•.7 '-�i "[ibis
48.0 T- 3,300 o 5 70 "'326511
, Mit
MI6 �P is
460 —2,850
voi VA
1.0a A6 49 a 450
lot —"i
assumes e i otFort uollmi-1996 water rate ot-li L.0 0 gall
T
MI cape plan ahukaj
S;Lps P,
-tj,
y
i or'Rocky'Mountain Maple,`Bnsth
;Green Ash, Kentucky Coffeetree,
kle, Lilacs; Potenti
Hardy Chrysanthec
Ikle, Shasta Daisv
'onderosa Pine, Go
x « `Holly, Uttleleaf Mockorange, Mu gho Pine, Potentilla, Shrub Rose Siberian " >
�< x �,Peashrub _
14,
- C Perennials Basket -of -Gold, Coreopsis, Candytuft, Daylilies, Dianthus, Harebell, Himalayan"
Border Jewel, Lamb's Ear, Perennial Stafice, Primrose, Sweet Woodruff
a ,
Very Low Water Use 4"/season - „-
Trees AmurChokecherrv, B Oak, Canyon Maple, Pinyon Pine r '
�
j.'L Shrubs Apache Plume, B`uffalobetry, Junipers, Mexican C1 ffrose, Mountain Maho,
q NewYMeiucan Pnvet; Rabbitbrush, Russian ' ,��ad Cherry; Saskatoon"`
`fi w, r�.`' ,.+s"+,7 7s;+,a , '. ... .. •;.u. `,rR 4. `aV: "IP' ih.::"+:19Ck.+t.'.t.. '7nr2A�:r�. `-' ..'Tici ag—e Sand :fii
-Xa ff � vP. �+1'v', r v� "'t ..' ..y '� •R T ." ��7 �'i-.:: �.5`Pyy:+!,
.� 19.`,-Where Kentucky Bluegrass and/or-Perenmal Ryegrass _used
sufficiently sized to deliver 0.25 inches of irrigat onwateraul
hour period. Where Turf -type Tall Fescue is uses ze
~f �{' deliver 0.20 inches of irrigation wateroverthe 'turfgrassarea,
�:4i "vspecfal circumstances, the City may allowexcepttons torthN s
�''�`�`�'s 20 The maximum system discharge shall bet1%ss.`than ocequaLfo
to the meter size, as detennmedF bythe Ctty ofFo'Coil> W
" follows: 3/4" - 10 gpm; I" 25 gpm, F I/2" 'S0'gpMI.
maximum discharges assume adisk-type meter,,In certain cas
.1-1/2" or larger, turbine meters are allowed, which have some
limits. Contact the Water Utilities for more mfonnatton �
r � =r1
21. The maximum velocities shall be less than or equal to S.O feel
less than or equal to 7.5 feet per second for lateral pipe--( de
22_ The irrigation system shall be designed such that the pomt-of
minus the possible system pressure losses, is greater than ore
operating pressure. (See Attachment�jD)ON
'�_,Ii-� i
'� nw
§. ap / '� r ••,�,,, ,fin Yv x: ��, f ,�' aft„'gr' �r,�_�.
�R
14
76
�and landscape inainwn��Mn�b
would"
�- not be used for
billing pu
:rshall be borne by owner 6 1
hall be- installed in accordance ordance wi
ssittyof cord ining zones on a s;n-Te station that
orprecipitation rates, or exceed the hydraulic
�ng requirements:
mve&b2fifimurn 3-1/2 inch pop -pp riser height..,
w1eyn'cfT Z5 ps F �t a-]
rof-connection . e ir
50 4
t w
;.7-inrior to construction.
: ------------
Mai
"1 -a es1. ign . . press — — -
in - pressure and I
uumdynamic pressure
50 gpm-& the 1-112-in,
he sprinkler and nozzle specifications,
ating pressu I re, and the maximum'
L
L 4
I&ustmerit or redesign of this irrigation system
ks Irrigation Standards.
cite, a requirernent for the contractor installing
as -built drawings after installation is complete.
WN
s6661ersor drip emitters, �vhen'the irrigation
must also include the number and discharge rate
ria . n t mate
mtL n '"t Y, l=
T LTse ower water^requtrmg Plan on south -facing be
s`=rNIu11In1Ze Iandscapmg is steps Iess than & Wnde�Wl
�sand street, use dower wateer requiring: plants ^ :
�� 2 - �; �.�t. 3.a '�-�'TI �. ♦ ^+nwi. was £. ' �z
•"` •l i s eta-{ t`i Y4 L.. x} n iA(v
. ne Natural Area Preservation t a r
" . 9. If there are P ortions of the site that are worthy of pre
them undisturbed or with only slight improvements
such sites shall be determined by the City'sNativat l
Other good practices for water efficient landscapes,,
„•r.;gi,,gH"e a testing laboratory anal ze the: nutrientandfe
y, :d.. "Ut"°4.+r.t.'t, wyw'ery •",Yf
r add at least 3 cubic yards of compost per l 000- ua
�.. inches: �. _ t
n T'; ` • =h e:, G. � .. ,i. ;y�.v °moo-'9r ._ < rtY-"�'Mr:
sir „ often a good substitute or Kentucky BluegrassjFoc
�Buffalograss, Blue GrainarLrttle: Iuestem, Sideo t
,ma .,;QS�t�: SA � Y'�t-��"
Wheatgrass or Western° Wheatgrasscany , good oh
y y +s7'r. ar -tr
grasses, "call the CS*U.EDepartment of Horticulture at
NFwN`C� iE
i �4�.r•,yTt l NnP' `M� rrl Yi4 C .irpn. I �4y L'ti Yl 1. `�
a+^ ''L. P!'Sc '7 eUSFT +e!wx+� v- e• - `y y.
de�ze)ropments, but •C o not apply to single y residen Io
Az wi
1Nhat do I have to do to comply with the Landscaping standards?K x
Sulirmt a Iandscape,plan as' part of the development review process. The plan must meet %
A the regmrements in the document, Landscaping Standards for Water Conservation before??r ;;
`' c rthe dev619,pment�lan is approved
..7pd"'yi�l?zM,yt
'` rr < xM. ., .�,=�. s. x"1X. ,,� .• .;,i y%SV ,4' " x•'"N•�, � '='r. :_�t;. 4.
What do 1have to do to comply with the Irrigation System standards, a';
"''• Submit an irrigation plan as part of the construction permit review process. The Ian must%'"
Meet the requirements spelled out in the document, Irrigation System Standards for
4 . Water Conservation. The City will review the plan, and then inspect the system after
installation. The irrigation plan and system inspection must be'approved by the City -
before a certificate of occupancy is issued. If construction of the irrigation system is
delayed until after construction is completed, a certificate of occupancy can be issued
only with an acceptable bond deposited with the Citv.
Haw strict are the standards?
The standards most important to water conservation are mandatory requirements,
identified with the word shall Other standards are more flexible, they use the phrases `
should or to the extent practical These are enforced on a case by -case basis #'�NYrf.,� I i,q{� "T 1 k':• ' y. ''� °v Yi 4'1 w,r i s .r n 1 S '` 4gg �.•-h�i S �i,+r � '�
b a M+S' � ♦G x11+ rr ✓ � t �' 'x `'�- 6 „' $ '-' try � �L 1L r.� 4J� � �
Where do I get more info mation?�Ri ; ta a
K "y Call the Water Utilities at 221 6681 *Pz4," ?r'
., t: I.rtN`I. I( R, x '. .�.5 j `' J. - *5'•... [ __: iyi .tA4�_-14
A- , •. .. C •" R i' ^' � S.' 1 r J1V � n_.-I'[.. :.?Y. 'Lf. ]E
l y fir•'
J
v
':'^�, .rz� �,.w.,, eel i .e� , i •�,,. *",l �.c
+,, .!e,w 5�
iXn r I
� � L. :. �t J'� i f
t. , 4 � h'•lrr
ji1"'v M
A.
p) Additional landscaping needs to be added along the west wall of the
trash collection area to soften the appearance.
q) Please see the attached red -lines for additional comments.
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be
forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to
review this request.
Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with
the submittal of plan revisions. Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have any
questions or concerns that are related to the comments. If you would like to
schedule a meeting, please call me as soon as possible.
Revisions may be submitted at any time. With the submittal of revisions, please
include the enclosed redlined plans. The number of revisions required is
attached.
Best regards,
Leanne A. Harter, AICP
City Planner
xc: Mike Dean
File/Project Planner
Page 4
the distance shown or adjust the plans to comply with the
requirements.
h) On the site plan, the word "removed" is spelled incorrectly.
i) Please check with Kathleen Reavis regarding the proposed location of
the bicycle racks.
j) The patio/courtyard area needs to be greater enhanced if it is intended
to become the exception to the build -to line requirements. Green
space needs to be added and the width possibly widened. Please
label the "picnic" tables, if that is what they are.
k) You are required to provide 6% landscaping of the interior of the
parking lot. It appears that in order to comply with the requirement, it
may be necessary to remove the most western parking space and
replace that with a landscaped island with two trees. In addition to
meeting the requirements for the interior parking lot landscaping
standards, such a change to the plans will bring the proposed
development into compliance with the requirements of "full tree
stocking" required in the Land Use Code. In addition, you are required
to only provide one handicapped parking space. It may be possible to
remove one of these spaces and adjust the size of the landscaped
buffer on the east side.
1) Additional screening of the parking area and area of the pumps is
required at the east and west entrances (please see the attached
redlined plans.)
m) You will need to add an additional tree on Drake Road, as well as two
(2) on/near the entrance to the car wash.
n) Although the review of the signs will fall under the requirements of the
Sign Code at a later date, I would just like to recommend that the
banded logo and signage shown on the elevations detracts from the
architectural and color scheme that obviously has been given much
thought and attention. I hope that you continue to work with the
Texaco Corporation so that the good work that has been done to fit the
building to the site isn't jeopardized by the signs.
o) The black and red colors on the canopy do not match the building in
terms of color and compatibility. All of the structures on the site should
be in the same "scheme" and appearance per the requirements of the
Land Use Code.
Page 3
d) Please do not show the signage on the canopy and building. An
independent sign permit will be required for the signage per the Sign
Code requirements.
e) Please show and label the dimensions for the building envelopes and
distances to the lot lines.
f) The proposed "Texaco sign" shown along Drake does not comply with
the Code. It will need to be placed 15' from the property line.
7. The Current Planning Department offered the following comments:
a) The photometric plan submitted shows that the lighting still exceeds
the maximum requirements of the Land Use Code. Therefore, in order
to comply with the requirements of the Land Use Code, it is necessary
to do one or all of the following: reduce the wattage, provide high-
pressure sodium light sources, or further direct the lighting downwards.
This section does have the alternative compliance option that may be
submitted by the applicant. Please reference Section 3.2.4(E) of the
Land Use Code for details on the section. A request for alternative
compliance must accompany the submittal of revisions. City staff is
more likely to recommend approval of a request for alternative
compliance if the light source is high pressure sodium rather than a
metal halide source, and if all the lighting sources beneath the canopy
are recessed.
b) Foundation plantings were added along the south elevation and east
elevation with the submittal of revisions, but according to the
requirements of Section 3.2.1(E)(a)(d) of the Land Use Code, the
width of the foundation plantings must be 5' minimum. It appears as if
the landscape plan does not meet this requirement.
c) There should be additional notes regarding bicycle parking, changes
to the site necessitating a minor amendment approval, meeting the
requirements on the Sign Code, and other standard general notes.
d) The signature blocks for the site plan need to be revised according to
what is shown on the attached redlined site plan.
e) On the site plan, please include the number of parking spaces allowed
per the requirements of the Land Use Code.
f) Why are there two different legals on the site plan?
g) The required minimum landscaped setback along Drake Road (an
arterial) is 15' from the edge of the ROW. Please confirm that this is
Page 2
Commun. , Planning and Environmental S ices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
July 16, 1998
Carr Beiker
The Architect's Studio
117 E. Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
Dear Carr:
City staff has reviewed the revisions submitted for the Kmart Plaza, Fuller's
Texaco Project Development Plan, #38-97, and offers the following comments:
The City's Water Conservation Specialist stated that "The landscape plan
shall include the total area (in square feet) for each landscape category.
Landscape categories are distinguished by their water requirements and
intended maintenance level. Examples of possible categories include, but
are not limited to, high water turfgrass, low water turfgrass, low water planting
beds, moderate water planting beds, and non -plant areas (paved areas, etc.)"
Please see the attached for additional information.
2. Comments from the Engineering Department are attached.
3. Comments for the Stormwater Utility are attached.
4. Comments from the Water/Wastewater Utility are attached
5. Light and Power Utility stated that we "will need to coordinate transformer
location."
6. The Zoning Department offered the following comments:
a) An alternative compliance will be required for parking numbers.
b) The Jiffy Lube ground/freestanding sign on College must be brought
into compliance with the code when the Texaco site is completed.
c) One (1) trees is required east of the carwash in the landscaped buffer
(a portion of that buffer is less than the required five (6) foot minimum.
281 North College Avenue - PO. Box 580 - Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 - (970) 221-6750 - FAX (970) 416-2020