Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGRANT STREET CORNERS - PDP - 20-08 - CORRESPONDENCE -6 & 7 especially will need to be looked at further to determine how the existing drive will need to be changed to meet the new sidewalk grade. Number: 49 Created: 10/9/2008 [10/9/08] The area between the driveways on lots 6 & 7 is an area of concern. Currently the residents park in the area between the drives. Once the new sidewalk is installed and you have cut into the drive approach to tap the water line you have several options with the driveways. 1) Extend the "median" out to the curb and gutter. 2) Install some sort of curb along the edge of the sidewalk to prevent parking in-between the drives. 3) Pave the middle portion and create a larger driveway on lot 6 that runs back to the existing house allowing vehicles to park behind the new sidewalk. Please define and show what will be happening in this area more clearly. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 47 Created: 10/9/2008 [10/9/08] No Comments. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: WaterMastewater Number: 43 Created: 10/7/2008 [10/7/08] No further comments. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please -feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, E Vbq P' Shelby Sommer City Planner Page 3 [10/6/08] Only one driveway parking space can be counted on Lots 2, 3, 5 and 7 (there may be room for more cars, but only one counts since cars become blocked in). This doesn't appear to be a problem because you satisfy the minimum number of required parking spaces without counting these tandem spaces, but the plans do need to be updated (see redlines). Number: 46 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/8/08] This project will be ready for an administrative public hearing after you provide my office with updated building elevations of the proposed house. Also, we will need an updated site plan for the public hearing since planning's copy was given back to you with redlines. Topic: Site Plan Number: 17 Created: 8/5/2008 [10/6/08] The calculations that you have provided are accurate for the lots that don't have any new buildings proposed on the rear 50%. Please update the calculations for lots 5, 6 and 7 to include the proposed floor area for the carriage houses (see redlines). [8/5/08] All lots in this zone are subject to a maximum FAR of 0.33 on the rear 50 percent of the NEW lot. Please provide calculations (either on the site plan or a separate document) to demonstrate that all of these lots comply with the FAR requirements. It appears to me that Lot 2 is questionable whether or not it complies. Number: 22 Created: 8/5/2008 [10/6/08] Please label trash enclosure on site plan and provide elevations with specified materials (on elevations page or elsewhere). [8/5/08] Since many of the existing garages are proposed to be removed, where will the residents store their trash? Trash. enclosures may be a good idea, and should be designed to match building architecture and should be large enough to accommodate recycling services. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Andrew Carney Topic: General Number: 44 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/8/08] Technical Services: Please correct a typo in the legal description - see redlines. Number: 45 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/8/08] Please extend the walks on lots 6 & 7 all the way to Grant Street after the existing attached walk is removed or remove the walk up to the edge of the new sidewalk. Topic: Site Plan Number: 48 Created: 10/9/2008 [10/9/08] Please provide some spot elevations to show how the elevations will work when the new sidewalk is installed across the existing driveways. The drives on lots Page 2 6� +, STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Stewart & Associates, Inc. ( Jerry Robinson) Date: 10/10/2008 103 S. Meldrum St Fort Collins, CO 80521 Staff has reviewed your submittal for Grant Street Corners PDP - Type I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Building Elevations Number: 26 Created: 8/5/2008 [10/6/08] It is still unclear which building elevations correspond with which property. I also need to see building elevations for the proposed new house on Lot 4 to make sure that is compatible with the surrounding existing architecture. [8/5/08] Please provide building elevations on 24 x 36" sheets and show all 4 sides of each carriage house, with dimensions and proposed materials. I will also need to see elevations for the proposed house. The exterior eave heights along side lot lines for carriage houses must not exceed 13 feet in height. Please refer to Division 4.7(F)(3) for a list of standards specific to carriage houses Number: 40 Created: 10/6/2008 [10/6/08] Please be aware that when calculating Floor Area for Carriage Houses (1,000 square feet maximum), basements are included in the calculations. Crawl spaces that are 72 inches or less (and without egress windows) are allowed and will not be included in floor area calculations for carriage houses. The proposed house on Lot 4 is allowed to have a basement and such basement will not be considered party of that lot's Total Floor Area. Number: 41 Created: 10/6/2008 [10/6/08] Please include maximum building height (24 feet/ 1 1/2 stories) on the elevations pages. Also, please label all building materials and proposed colors. Number: 42 Created: 10/6/2008 [10/6/08] Per Section 4.8(F)(3)(c), to the extent reasonably feasible, decks, entry doors, major entry stairs and major windows shall face the existing building or alley. Windows that overlooks an abutting side or rear yard shall be minimized. Without knowing which elevations correspond to which lot it is difficult to tell how each carriage house will impact adjacent properties. If the carriage houses are rotated 90 degrees as discussed at the Staff Review meeting, this should not be an issue. Topic: General Number: 39 Created: 10/6/2008 Page 1