Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTADIUM APARTMENTS (FORMERLY LAKE STREET APARTMENTS) - FDP - FDP160037 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, Topic: General Comment Number: 1 eolson@fcgov.com Comment Originated: 10/17/2016 10/17/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Utility Plan —Please provide water meter sizing calculations to justify the 3-inch water meter proposed at this site. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Utility Plan —please address minor callout corrections noted in the redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Utility Details— Please remove the sewer wye connection detail as the sewer connection to the existing main in Lake Street will be a direct tap into the main. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Please note that plantings are not allowed on top of the water meter vault. Department: Zoning Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416-2743, avandeutekom@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: By the time we reach mylars the sheets need to be in numerical order. Please include the supplemental kba drawings as part of the final set. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Based on 254 provided parking spaces you are required to provide 7 handicap spaces. Please adjust the project parking table and site plan. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: The bike parking table numbers are not aligned with the actual provided bike parking. I count 390 bike parking spaces provided. Please update the table. N Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: There are cut off text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Some of the sheet numbers do not match the sheet index. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Please add the project name "Stadium Apartments" to the plan sheet. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Please define the Drainage Easement along Lake Street. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Please add the distances as marked. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Drainage Report— Please check the basin ID's shown in the Drainage Exhibit and the basin ID's in the report —these don't always seem to match. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Drainage Report —the detention pond information is hard to follow and its difficult for me to relate some of the numbers shown in the body of the report to the calculations in the appendices. Can you simply present the detention pond information in a table in the report and then combine the detention calculations and the water quality calculations into the same appendix so I don't have to scroll back and forth to try to put all the information together for each pond? Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Drainage Report —see redlined report for other minor comments. I will email this to Cody. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Site Plan —remove the reference to the rain garden. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischlam@fcqov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/2016 10/04/2016: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (With changed IP detail) , an Erosion Control Report (based upon redlines included on the returned CD), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (Acceptable no changes required). Also, based upon the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, ]county@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 9 10/21/2016: There is text that needs to be masked areas. See redlines. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 Mask all text in hatched Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Please add a comma as marked in the sheet C2.02 description. See redlines. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. 7 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Storm Drain Plan and Profile —Please provide a hydraulic analysis of the storm pipe running from the courtyard, through the building, to Pond A. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Subgrade Plan — There are several details on this sheet that indicate permeable pavers. There are also several notes on the second sheet of the subgrade plan that indicate the use of pavers. Please fix. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Subgrade Plan — I think the intent with the underdrain is that it is supposed to drain the bottom 6 inches of rock below the stormtech chambers. Can you include the underdrain in the typical stormtech detention chamber detail so its clear where the underdrain is supposed to sit relative to the chamber bottom. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Subgrade Plan —It appears as though there area few chambers on the plans that aren't connected to anything. Please fix. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Erosion Control Plan —where are you proposing riprap? We discourage the use of riprap and prefer other means. Please remove this from the legend and remove the riprap detail from the detail sheet if you don't plan to use it anywhere. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Drainage Exhibit — LID Table —Please note that a "grass buffer" can only be counted as LID if there is a sub -grade installed like a raingarden or if it meets other parameters as outlined in USDCM. Also, you don't need to include OS1 or OS3 in the LID calculations because they are 100% pervious. The LID table should include "Percent of Impervious Area Treated by LID". Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Drainage Exhibit— Please make sure basin ID's match the report. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Drainage Exhibit— there is a sidewalk culvert at design point C2 — please indicate type (metal or concrete) and width of opening. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Drainage Details —the outlet structure detail needs some updating. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Drainage Details— page numbers are wonky. Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Drainage Report — for the overall release rates from the site, you're able to grandfather in the existing impervious areas so you may be able to release at a greater rate and reduce the required detention volumes. R Plan may need to ue also be adjusted so that these walkways are properly illuminated. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: On the Landscape Plan, the two Blue Spruce in the southeast corner may conflict with the easterly connecting walkway. Please consider moving these to the southwest corner where there appears to be more space. (If there are existing trees in the southwest corner, please label as such and consider other locations for the Spruce.) Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Prior to printing mylars, we need to resolve the use of ghosted imaging for the existing trees as such a graphic is difficult to clearly reproduce. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: On the architectural sheets, we need to seethe building profile that demonstrates compliance with Section 4.10(D)(2)(b) Dimensional Standards — Setbacks. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: On the architectural elevations, please provide a dimensioned detail (vertical and horizontal) of the flat roof cornice so we can evaluate its extent. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: On the Site Plan, at the northwest corner, there is a wall that labeled with a reference to the civil plans (no sheet number is provided). What is the extent of this wall? Does it match the stone veneer on the building exterior? Does this wall offer seating capability for gathering? Please provide a detail (material, height, etc.) of this wall on the planning set as well. Be sure to label this wall on the Landscape Plan as well. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Please check the routing to make sure we got a final Lighting Plan. Be sure to make any necessary adjustments to accommodate the two connecting walkways to the east and south. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Sheet 5 still indicates that the fence along the south property line does not include the columns and yet the response letter indicates otherwise. Please correct Sheet 5. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Horizontal Control Plan —The legend indicates that there are permeable pavers somewhere. Please fix. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Storm Drain Plan and Profile— Please include 100-yr HGL's in all profiles. 5 > IFC 507.5.1.1: Buildings equipped with a standpipe system installed in accordance with Section 905 shall have a fire hydrant within 100 feet of the fire department connections. Exception: The distance shall be permitted to exceed 100 feet where approved by the fire code official. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/25/2016 10/20/2016: COMMENT UPDATE / RETRACTION After consulting the ICC for code interpretation, it was determined that IFC D104 is not intended to be applied directly to multi -family projects. The requirement to provide two separate fire access roads for commercial properties of this size is therefore not mandatory by code. However, as discussed in the follow-up meeting at PFA Administration Building on 10/19/2016, providing for a fire access connections to the proposed Standard Site will allow additional portions of the Stadium Apt. Building's south side to meet aerial apparatus access where no access was previously available. Prior comment: 09/25/2016: BUILDINS EXCEEDING 124,000 SQUARE FEET > IFC D104: Commercial projects having a gross building area of more than 124,000 sq. ft. shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads, regardless of regardless of whether they are equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/25/2016 09/25/2016: AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS VS ALTERNATIVE MEANS AND METHODS No portion of the building is being served by a fire lane designed to minimum aerial apparatus standards. Therefore, the entire building is considered out of aerial access. The fire marshal has reviewed the project and its relation to other associated infill projects in the area. His concern relates to overall density in association with an overall lack in fire access to this site and other surrounding sites. The project team submitted a letter back in March offering alternative means for meeting the intent of the fire code. The fire marshal has reviewed the letter. At this time, he is requiring the project to meet the intent of the code via more stringent compliance with high rise provisions of the IFC & IBC. Should the project team wish to discuss this issue further, I am happy to facilitate a meeting with the FM. Department: Planning Services Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Now that The Standard student -oriented multi -family project is in for review, please adjust the two access easements to the east and south, as necessary, in order to provide one walkway connection to the south and one walkway connection to the east. Both of these walkways should be concrete and six feet wide. Due to the density associated with Stadium Apartments and the proposed Standard Apartments, crusher fines is not an appropriate surface for these walkways based on anticipated usage. Please note that the Lighting 4 Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 6 10/21/2016: Mitigation Trees: Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 Identify the 33 required mitigation trees. Please mark them with an M on the direct label and upsize them in the plant list as follows. Canopy Shade Trees 3.0 inch caliper Ornamental Trees 2.5 inch caliper Evergreen Trees 9 feet height Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21/2016: Review the totals in the two tables labeled Tree Mitigation Summary and Provided Tree Mitigation on sheet 3 of 8 for accuracy. The required mitigation trees (33) can all be placed on the plan by upsizing. Comment Number: 8 10/21/2016: List all trees as B&B in the plant list. Department: Light And Power Contact: Luke Unruh, 9704162724, lunruh@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges, and any necessary system modification charges will apply. Please see the Electric Estimating Calculator and Electric Construction Policies, Practices & Procedures at the following link: hftp://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Please provide a C-1 form, a one -line diagram, and a Cad version of the utility plan. You can find the C-1 form at: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/25/2016 09/25/2016: HYDRANT FOR STANDPIPE SYSTEMS A hydrant is required within 100' of any Fire Department Connection (FDC). The latest utility plans show the distance between hydrant and FDC to be approximately 150'. Options are to relocate the FDC to the NE area of the building or add a hydrant on the south side of Lake Street. Code language provided below. 3 Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: There is a portion of the underground detention directly south of the building that is not within a drainage easement. Please adjust the plans and the plat. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Please show the existing slopes along Lake Street to the east and west of the site. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Remove the z-cut detail from the plans. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Label the curb cut detail as "Private" Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Please use the modified sidewalk chase (D-10) to include the tapers. This detail was used on The Slab Property project as well. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Fix sheet numbering for Sheets 18-21. All are named Sheet 18. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Refer to redlines for various Utility Plan cleanup. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, rverette@fcqov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/12/2016 10/12/2016: The tree mitigation plan does not seem to match the demolition plan in the civil set. See redlines for mismatches that need to be resolved. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tuchanan@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 10/21 /2016: Continued: The species of existing trees 55-59 are actually willow. Please add a note in reference to these 5 trees that says in effect the following: Trees to be evaluated by a City of Fort Collins Licensed Arborist that is also certified by the International Society of Arboriculture at the time of required pruning. (See tree protection note number 3). Any tree recommended for removal by the Certified Arborist shall be removed and replaced with one canopy shade tree 2.0 inch caliper B&B. Recommendations by the Certified Arborist to remove any of these trees shall be provided to the City Forester. 03/17/2016: Existing trees number 55-59 are large Siberian Elm to retain. These 5 trees should be inspected by a certified arborist using a climber or bucket truck to determine if there are any structural problems that could pose a hazard. Follow the recommendations of the certified arborist. 2 Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax lcgov. com/developmentreview October 22, 2016 Stephanie Van Dyken Ripley Design, Inc. 419 Canyon Ave Ste 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Stadium Apartments (formely Lake Street Apartments), FDP160037, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Refer to the cross sections on the cover sheet as Interim and Ultimate. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Series of street cut patches less than 75 feet need to be combined. Please adjust the street cut limits along Lake Street. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: What is the radius of the driveway curb return? The maximum curb return radii for a high volume driveway on a Collector roadway is 15'. Also please refer to LCUASS Detail 707.2 for driveway details. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: The minimum width of a driveway for multi -family units with more than 12 units is 28'. Please adjust the width of the Driveway. This width will need to be maintained for about a car length or 20'.