Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTADIUM APARTMENTS (FORMERLY LAKE STREET APARTMENTS) - FDP - FDP160037 - CORRESPONDENCE -11/30/2016: Inca has not been corrected. 10/21/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/17/2016 10/17/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: Utility Plan — Please label the Water Quality Pond, like you did the other ponds, on this sheet. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: Utility Plan —It looks like there are several retaining walls in the utility easement along the property frontage. Please provide a detail of these walls, with the footer information included so we can be sure that the footer isn't going to inhibit installation of underground utilities along this stretch. Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: Water Meter sizing information —please include a narrative or letter that accompanies the calculations that includes irrigation information. If the irrigation system is fed from this same meter, please justify the meter size with the irrigation system included. Department: Zoning Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416-2743, Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 avandeutekom@fcgov.com Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 11/30/2016: The parking table needs to be updated. 10/18/2016: Based on 254 provided parking spaces you are required to provide 7 handicap spaces. Please adjust the project parking table and site plan. 0 Department: Technical Ser...:es Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 11/30/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. 10/21/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 11/30/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 10/21/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 11/30/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. 10/21/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Topic: General Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: FLOOR PLAN: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: FLOOR PLAN: There is text that needs to be rotated 1800. See redlines. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: FLOOR PLAN: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: FLOOR PLAN: There are duplicated text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: ROOF PLAN: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: SITE SECTION STUDY: Please add a sheet number. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: BUILDING SECTIONS: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 11/30/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 10/21/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: Please add new title commitment information if available. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 7 Comment Number: 10 comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: On the Landscape Plan, in the northwest corner, please show how the electrical transformers are coordinated with, and screened by, the landscaping. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fc-gov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: Storm P&P's —it looks like you're providing sumps in some of the drain basins. Is this your intent and if so, why? If this isn't you're intent, update the profiles and callout information. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: Grading Plan —The concrete chase located along the northeasterly property line looks like its for an emergency overflow from the rain garden. Can you simply put an inlet into the storm pipe from the rain garden? Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016: Grading Plan —The FFE is quite a bit lower than the FG elevations shown along the south side of the building. I can't tell what is going on with this. Also, please provide some spot elevations within the courtyard area. You have a basin delineation here and I need to see how that works. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016: Grading Plan —The Water Quality Pond Cis called out as a "rain garden" on this sheet. Is this a rain garden or just a WQ pond? Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016: Drainage Exhibit — Some of the information in the Detention Pond Summary Table doesn't match what is in the report. Please update. 11/29/2016 11/29/2016 11/29/2016 Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: Drainage Details — For the outlet structure details on Sheet C7.05, is the top of weir set at the 100-yr WSEL for the detention basins and the WQCV elevation for the water quality chambers? If so, please include the WSEL information here. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: General —See redlined plans for other minor comments. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: Drainage Report— IV Drainage Facility Design, B. Specific Details — I can't tell if you're adding the WQCV to the required 100-yr detention volume or including it? Please be sure that you're adding the two required volumes together to come up with a total volume. There are some numbers included in this section of text that I can't match up to the calculations so please update. Also, can you combine Sections 3 and 4 to make it easier to follow? Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: Drainage Report— see redlined report for other minor comments. A Comment Numbt,: 3 uumment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Prior to printing mylars, we need to resolve the use of ghosted imaging for the existing trees as such a graphic is difficult to clearly reproduce. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: On the architectural sheets, we need to seethe building profile that demonstrates compliance with Section 4.10(D)(2)(b) Dimensional Standards 6 Setbacks. November 30, 2016: Carried Over: Regarding the standard that requires the additional building setback at the point where the building exceeds 35 feet in height (Section 4.10(D)(2)(b), thank you for providing the Building Sections on sheet 13. It would be helpful to also add a dimension for the distance between the property line and first floor. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: On the Site Plan, at the northwest corner, there is a wall that labeled with a reference to the civil plans (no sheet number is provided). What is the extent of this wall? Does it match the stone veneer on the building exterior? Does this wall offer seating capability for gathering? Please provide a detail (material, height, etc.) of this wall on the planning set as well. Be sure to label this wall on the Landscape Plan as well. November 30, 2016: Carried Over: Staff remains concerned about vagueness of this wall being described simply as "modular block." This is not very descriptive. Staff strongly recommends that this material be upgraded in a manner that complements the Colored Buff Sandstone in both texture and color. Staff also recommends that this wall include a capstone for seating to enhance the potential for gathering. Please add this wall specification to the Exterior Material Schedule on sheet eight. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Sheet 5 still indicates that the fence along the south property line does not include the columns and yet the response letter indicates otherwise. Please correct Sheet 5. November 30, 2016: Carried Over: Pleases be sure to clearly specify that this fence is to be constructed along both the west and south property lines. Also, the image shows the columns having capstones but the schematic does not. Please be sure to specify on the schematic that the columns include capstones. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: On the Landscape Plan sheet 4, along the west property line, please clearly indicate with a heavier line work or by graphic symbols (not with ghosted line) the existing trees that are to remain. Otherwise, it takes two sheets to read what the actual extent of the landscaping along this property line. 5 Comment Number: 7 %.,omment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: FIRE HOSE CONNECTION A fire hose connection will need to be provided just inside the entrance doorway(s) to the courtyard. I am willing to work off line with the design team to determine location. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: POOL CHEMISTRY A list of pool chemicals with MSDS sheets, along with chemical quantities on site (both in use and in storage) will be required at time of building permit. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: ALTERNATIVE MEANS AND METHODS The plan for meeting the intent of the fire code as it pertains to aerial apparatus access has been submitted to PFA and is currently under review by the fire marshal. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: FENCING PLAN Language should be added where appropriate to the plans and in the development agreement to indicate the conditions under which the proposed fencing plan will be amended if and when "The Standard" (or other development) occurs on the adjoining properties to the south and east. Department: Planning Services Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Now that The Standard student -oriented multi -family project is in for review, please adjust the two access easements to the east and south, as necessary, in order to provide one walkway connection to the south and one walkway connection to the east. Both of these walkways should be concrete and six feet wide. Due to the density associated with Stadium Apartments and the proposed Standard Apartments, crusher fines is not an appropriate surface for these walkways based on anticipated usage. Please note that the Lighting Plan may need to be also be adjusted so that these walkways are properly illuminated. November 30, 2016: Carried Over: Regarding the timing of this walkway connection, staff is aware that this walkway may become part of the emergency access drive for The Standard Apartments that is the abutting property to the south and in the planning process. If The Standard gains final approval and moves into construction, then this walkway is eliminated and the emergency access drive will act as the connection. But if The Standard does not move forward, then the connection must be made solely on The Stadium site. Please add a note that explains this condition. Also, be sure that the portion that is on The Stadium property is placed within an Access Easement. 4 Department: Light And Po.._r Contact: Luke Unruh, 97041627249 Iunruh@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges, and any necessary system modification charges will apply. Please see the Electric Estimating Calculator and Electric Construction Policies, Practices & Procedures at the following link: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 10/19/2016: Please provide a C-1 form, a one -line diagram, and a Cad version of the utility plan. You can find the C-1 form at: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, *ynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: 2015 IFC CODE ADOPTION The Poudre Fire Authority and the City of Fort Collins are in the process of adopting the 2015 International Fire Code. Building plan reviews shall be subject to the adopted version of the fire code in place at the time of plan review submittal and permit application. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT Please ensure that required turning radii is taken into account at the SE connection to the property currently planning to be developed by The Standard. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11/30/2016: FIRE LANE SIGNAGE The fire lane signage plan should be adjusted per redlines. Rather than "No Parking - Fire Lane", the signage on the SW hammerhead should read either "Emergency Access Only" or if you prefer, "No Entry - Emergency Vehicles Only". Signage location in this area is approved and should otherwise be designed to meet the standard provided below. > IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING - FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2. K] Comment Number: 13 vomment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: What are the heights of the retaining walls along Lake Street. Its unclear from the Grading Plan on how high they go. In some locations it looks to be about 4'. Are they going to be structural? Footers? Please provide more information. Structures would not be allowed within easements dedicated to the City. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: The Emergency Access, Access, Drainage and Utility easement at the driveway entrance should match the driveway width. The driveway tapers from 28' to 26'. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: The Typical Rain Garden detail is listed twice on Sheets C7.01 and C7.08. Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/30/2016 11 /30/2016: Please list the reason for removal for trees 55-59. These trees are declining and hazardous. Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/21/2016 11 /30/2016: The species of existing trees 55-59 are actually Willow, not Siberian Elm. Forestry is okay with their current status for removal. 10/21 /2016: Continued: The species of existing trees 55-59 are actually willow. Please add a note in reference to these 5 trees that says in effect the following: Trees to be evaluated by a City of Fort Collins Licensed Arborist that is also certified by the International Society of Arboriculture at the time of required pruning. (See tree protection note number 3). Any tree recommended for removal by the Certified Arborist shall be removed and replaced with one canopy shade tree 2.0 inch caliper B&B. Recommendations by the Certified Arborist to remove any of these trees shall be provided to the City Forester. 03/17/2016: Existing trees number 55-59 are large Siberian Elm to retain. These 5 trees should be inspected by a certified arborist using a climber or bucket truck to determine if there are any structural problems that could pose a hazard. Follow the recommendations of the certified arborist. 2 F City Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview December 5, 2016 Stephanie Van Dyken Ripley Design, Inc. 419 Canyon Ave Ste 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Stadium Apartments (formerly Lake Street Apartments), FDP160037, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 11/29/2016: Please use the detail that utilizes vertical curb and gutter, not roll over. 10/19/2016: Please use the modified sidewalk chase (D-10) to include the tapers. This detail was used on The Slab Property project as well. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/19/2016 11/29/2016: Refer to redlines for more Utility Plan clean up. 10/19/2016: Refer to redlines for various Utility Plan cleanup. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/29/2016 11/29/2016: The curb chases along W Lake Street need to be combined. More information is also needed for the headwall/chase connection. The details provided aren't clear how they tie into the chase.