Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPVH MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING & PARKING STRUCTURE - PDP - 14-07 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYo /Doctors r _ll I(_ a� a o 1 Eliza eth Garfield 0 Possible Mid Robertson Range Roundabout �/ � - Denotes Lane Prospect 11 eCU T E J SHORT RANGE (2009) AND MID RANGE (2013) GEOMETRY Figure 15 36 IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus on the short range (2009), mid range (2013), and long range (2030) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: - The expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. Phases 1-3 of the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus will generate approximately 335 daily trip ends, 23 morning peak hour trip ends, and 22 afternoon peak hour trip ends. At full development, the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus will generate approximately 5700 daily trip ends, 391 morning peak hour trip ends, and 460 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable with existing control and geometry. In the short range (2009) and mid range (2013) futures, given the respective development of Phases 1-3 and full development of the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections are shown to operate acceptably. The short range (2009) and mid range (2013) geometry is shown in Figure 15. In the long range (2030) future, given development of the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus and an increase in background traffic, some key intersections will experience delays that are commensurate with level of service F along Lemay Avenue. The Lemay Avenue corridor is defined as a "constrained corridor." The long range geometry is shown in Figure 16. Pedestrian, bicycle, and transit level of service will be acceptable. 39 o —� 1 Doctors CD N 0 Robertson r ProspectCU _� } C C J LONG RANGE (2030) GEOMETRY 38 i Possible Long Range Roundabout - Denotes Lane Figure 16 other right -turn movements exceed the threshold for a right -turn lane, in a meeting in January 2007, City staff indicated that the above right - turn lane would be the only one that would be required. Due to right- of-way constraints, this right -turn lane cannot meet the LCUASS design standards. The project civil engineer (Stantec) is preparing a design for this lane. Figure 16 shows a schematic of the long range (2030) geometry. While Lemay Avenue is designated as a four -lane arterial, the 2030 forecasts indicate that six through lanes would be required to achieve acceptable operation at the key intersections. If the City desired to have a six -lane cross section, it would likely be a City funded capital improvement. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix I shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus. There will be six pedestrian destinations within 1320 feet of the PVH Lemay Campus. These are: 1) the commercial area northwest of the site, 2) the commercial area north of the site, 3) the medical office uses adjacent to the site, 4) the residential area east of the site, 5) the residential area south of the site, and 6) the residential area west/southwest of the site. This site is in an area type termed "activity center." Acceptable pedestrian level of service can be achieved for all pedestrian factors. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix I. The minimum level of service for "activity center" is B for all categories. Bicycle Level of Service Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there is one bicycle destination within 1320 feet of the PVH Lemay Campus. It is the commercial area to the northwest. This site will achieve bicycle level of service B connectivity which exceeds the base city-wide minimum. Transit Level of Service The Fort Collins Transit System Map (future) shows that Lemay Avenue will be a high frequency transit corridor with 20 minute service. The future transit level of service will be at B. 37 Continued from previous page TABLE 8 Long Range (2030) Total Peak Hour Operation Intelrsecte64b pw:, ovem ent Lemay/Doctors (signal) EB LT D C EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D D WB LT D F WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D F NB LT A C NB B B NB RT A A NB APPROACH A B SB LT B C SBT B D SB RT D C SB APPROACH C D OVERALL B D Lemay/Elizabeth (signal) EB LT C F EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D E WB LT D C WB T/RT D E WB APPROACH D D NB LT A D NB C C NB RT B B NB APPROACH B C SB LT B B SBT B D SB RT B 6 SB APPROACH B D OVERALL B D Elizabeth/Patton (stop sign) NB LT/RT B B WB LT. A A Elizabeth/McHugh (all -way stop) EB LT A A EB RT A A EB APPROACH A A SWB LT/RT A A NWB LT A A NWB RT A A NM APPROACH A A OVERALL A A Elizabeth/McHugh-Patton (roundabout) EB (Elizabeth) 0.14/0.17 0.12 J 0.15 WB (McHugh) 0.07/0.08 0.05/0.07 NB (Patton) 0.07/0.09 0.12/0.15 :::� SB (Elizabeth) 6 - .18/0.21 /0 0.14/0.17 35 TABLE 8 Long Range (2030) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersect6on ` Movement l evel df SeryQce AM (sisignal)gnal) rospect L EB LT F F EB T F F EB RT C C EB APPROACH F F WB LT F F WBT F F WB RT D C WB APPROACH F F NB LT E F NB T E D NB RT C C NB APPROACH D E SB LT F F SB T C F SB RT C C SB APPROACH D F OVERALL E F Lemay/Robertson (signal) EB LT D D EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D p WB LT D D WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D D NB LT A A NS T/RT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT A A SB T/RT A A SB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A Lemay/Garfield (stop sign) EB LT/RT C F NB LT B F Gartield/Robertson (stop sign) EB LTIT/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A NB LT/T/RT A A SB LT/T/RT B B Continued on next page 34 Continued from previous page TABLE 7 Mid Range (2013) Total Peak Hour Operation Int on lice� 'f,, M eve o Lemay/Doctors (signal) EB LT D D EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D D WB LT D D VVFB T/RT D C WB APPROACH D D NB LT A C NB A A NB RT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT B C SB T C D SB RT D D SB APPROACH C D OVERALL B C Lemay/Elizabeth (signal) EB LT C C EB T/RT D C EB APPROACH D C WB LT D C WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D D NB LT A B NB T/RT B C NB APPROACH 6 C SB LT A B SB T/RT B C SB APPROACH B C OVERALL B C Eliza beth/Patton (stop sign) NB LT/RT B B VVIB LT A A Elizabeth/McHugh (all -way stop) EB LT A A EB RT A A EB APPROACH A A SWB LT/RT A A NWB LT A A NWB RT A A NWB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A Elizabeth/McHugh-Patton (roundabout) EB (Elizabeth) 0.08/0.10 0.10/0.12 VVB (McHugh) 0.07/0.08 0.06/0.07 NB (Patton) 0.07/0.09 0.13/0.16 SB (Efizabeth) 0.19/0.23 0.08/0.09 33 TABLE 7 Mid Range (2013) Total Peak Hour Operation Interse16vo {iAovemeri4 Le vel o$: SOV A� PhR Lemay/Prospect (signal) EB LT D E EB T/RT D E EB APPROACH D E WB LT D E WBT D D WB RT C C WB APPROACH D D NB LT B E NB T C C NB RT B B NB APPROACH C C SB LT D D SB T C D SB RT B B SB APPROACH C D OVERALL D D Lemay/Robertson (signal) EB. LT D D EB T/RT D D EB.APPROACH D D WB LT D D WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D D NB LT A A NB T/RT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT A A SB T/RT A A SB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A Lemay/Garfield (stop sign) EB LT/RT B E NB LT B D Garfield/Robertson (stop sign) EB LTlf/RT A A WB LTJT/RT A - A NB LT/T/RT A A SB LTIT/RT B g Continued on next page 32 Continued from previous page TABLE 6 Short Range (2009) Total Peak Hour Operation lnteji rse,,, vemei vel a€:ServEce Le.. ... Lemay/Doctors (signal) EB LT D D EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D D WB LT D D WB T/RT D C WB APPROACH D D NB LT A C NB A A NB RT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT B B SBT B D SB RT D D SB APPROACH C C OVERALL B C Lemay/Elizabeth (signal) EB LT C C EB T/RT D C EBAPPROACH C C W*13 LT D C WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D D NB LT A B NB T/RT B C NB APPROACH B C SB LT A B SB T/RT B C SB APPROACH B C OVERALL B C Elizabeth/Patton (stop sign) NB LT/RT B B WB LT A A Elizabeth/McHugh (all -way stop) EB LT A A ES RT A A EB APPROACH A A SWB LT/RT A A NWB LT A A NWB RT A A. NWB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A 31 TABLE 6 Short Range (2009) Total Peak Hour Operation in terse nt, ' Sim -."t6416f of "Am PAA Lemay/ProspeGt (signal) EB LT D D EB T/RT D E EB APPROACH D E WB LT D E Vi/B T D D WB RT C C WB APPROACH. D D NB LT B E NB C C NB RT B B NB APPROACH C C SB LT C D SBT C C SB RT C A SB APPROACH C C OVERALL c D Lemay/Robertson (signal) EB LT D D EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D D WB LT D D WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D DNB LT A A NB T/RT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT A A SB T/RT A A SB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A Lemay/Garfield (stop sign) EB LT/RT B D NB LT B C Garfield/Robertson (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A NB LTJT/RT A A SB LT/T/RT B B Continued on next page 30 Continued from previous page Long Range (2030) Background Peak Hour Operation NB APPROACH A B OVERALL B EB T/RT D M EB APPROACH 7D E (stop sign) Wa LT A Elizabeth/McHugh 7A SWB LT/RT 29 TABLE 5 Long Range (2030) Background Peak Hour Operation tntersec6on " Movement, AFbJ. PAA Lemay/Prospect (signal) EB LT F F EB T E F. EB RT C C EB APPROACH E F WB LT F F WB T E F. WB RT C C WB APPROACH E F NB LT E F NB T D D NB RT C C NB APPROACH D D SB LT F F SB T C F SB RT C C SB APPROACH D F OVERALL E F Lemay/Robertson (signal) EB LT D D EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D D WB LT D D WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D DNB LT A q NB T/RT . A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT A q SB T/RT A A SB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A Lemay/Garfield (stop sign) EB LT/RT C F NB LT B F Garf'ield/Robertson (stop sign) EB LTIr/RT A A WB I T/T/RT A A NB LTlr/RT A A SB LT/T/RT A A Continued on next page 28 Continued from previous page TABLE 4 Mid Range (2013) Background Peak Hour Operation Inte'rs'ectii(m Lemay/Doctors (signal) EB LT D C EB T/RT D C EB APPROACH D C WB LT D D WB T/RT D C WB APPROACH D D NB LT A A NB A A NB RT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT A B SB T/RT A C SB APPROACH A C OVERALL A 8 Lemay/Elizabeth (signal) EB LT C C EB T/RT D C ES APPROACH D C We LT D C WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D D NB LT A C NB T/RT C C NB APPROACH C C SB LT A B SB T/RT B C SB APPROACH B C OVERALL C C Elizabeth/Patton (stop sign) NB LT/RT 8 A WB LT A A Elizabeth/McHugh (all -way stop) EB LT A A EB RT A A EB APPROACH A A SWB LT/RT A A NWB LT A A NWB RT W_ A NWB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A 27 TABLE 4 Mid Range (2013) Background Peak Hour Operation NB APPROACH C (signal) NB LT A A NB APPROACH A A (stop sign) NB LT B C Continued on next page 26 Continued from previous page TABLE 3 Short Range (2009) Background Peak Hour Operation Yq NB APPROACH A A We LT D C NB APPROACH B C 25 TABLE 3 Short Range (2009) Background Peak Hour Operation t i 11ft &CU,on.`s, K l�OYetTterrf f ; Lauri Servece w Lemay/Prospect (signal) l EB LT C D EB T/RT D E EB APPROACH D D WB LT C D WBT D D WB RT C C WB APPROACH D D NB LT B E NB T C C NB RT B B NB APPROACH C C SB LT D C SB T C D SB RT E A SB APPROACH D C OVERALL C D Lemay/Robertson (signal) EB LT D D . EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D D WB LT D D WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D D NB LT A A NB T/RT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT A A SB T/RT A A SB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A Lemay/Garfield (stop sign) EB LT/RT B D NB LT B C Gafield/Robertson (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A NB LT/T/RT A A SB LT/T/RT A A Continued on next page 24 I Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7, the key intersections operate in the short range (2009) background traffic condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix C. All the key intersections will operate acceptably. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8, the key intersections operate in the mid range (2013) background traffic condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. All the key intersections will operate acceptably. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9, the key intersections operate in the long range (2030) background traffic condition as indicated in Table 5. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. Some movements at a few intersections will experience delays that are commensurate with level of service F. This is not unexpected, since the City of Fort Collins has indicated that Lemay Avenue is a "constrained" corridor. Using the traffic volumes shown in• Figure 12, the key intersections operate in the short range (2009) total traffic condition as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. All the key intersections will operate acceptably. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 13, the key intersections operate in the mid range (2013) total traffic condition as indicated in Table 7. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix G. All the key intersections will operate acceptably. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 14, the key intersections operate in the long range (2030) total traffic condition as indicated in Table 8. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix H. As with the bong range background operation, some movements at a few intersections will experience delays that are commensurate with level of service F. This is not unexpected, since the City of Fort Collins has indicated that Lemay Avenue is a "constrained" corridor. Roundabout Analysis A resolution of the Fort Collins City Council requires a roundabout analysis at arterial/arterial and arterial/collector intersections. The roundabout analysis at these intersections was waived. As indicated earlier, the Elizabeth/McHugh-Patton roundabout intersection was analyzed for the mid range (2013) and long range (2030) total peak hour traffic forecasts. Geometry Figure 15 shows a schematic of the short range (2009) and mid range (2013) geometry. A southbound right -turn lane approaching the Lemay/Doctors intersection will be required. While the volumes at some P. 3 O g $ 501150 551125 20/110 1 Elizabeth 90/160 f 70/60 —� °ter 1201130 Ln C) m '85/140 + — 25/15 75/285 f 0 40/120 — J� f Doctors r 1 Mo y 50/155 o in in tZ M W) N N Z 115/50 o I�i c O 4� Garfield �/ 1 5/10 f 25/30 1 0 N 55/145 5/5 o z "' C c N j O O CO '3/5 _O o to } �- NOM 20/25 /— Robertson 5110 �/ f NOM y o Ln tn 10/10 `O m �n too o i rn V LO InCDLO ITS, �— o 21 s/2o5 CO �— 875/1100 205/335 i— Prospect 275/245 935/1045 —� 90/145 Unoo to IT � N N O N p O A IO E N J LONG RANGE (2030) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ¢ 125/140 130155 20/125 40/30 —s S0 20 16s/16o \ o 1 s/so —� M N 'O A 00 �60�4�0 05/65 �O� 0 15/60 —� 40/30 h ^ icy <v 04t �c ,0 2 / _ ---a-- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Figure 14 22 N to N �D "wo 39/113 1 m Q' � 44/95 15/82 n /- Elizabeth 701117 7/ 54146 v o LO 9 � C N rn v L o N °i { 85/141 �- 24/15 - 64270 \ 0 39/117 f Doctors r 827 �- o v m 0 53/152 N D: � aa 111/41 o^ -- 9/3 9/3 Garfield 2s24 517 —� 2528 -� m a co 521143 5/0 —� co �—c')14 as �— o/o n27 Robertson 110 8/8 CD `° `I a � rn v O ODa� N ` m 135/129 -f- 5471689 130211 Prospect 202/179 �/ f 588/657 —� 74/117 o .- cn m O S rn r� T r N E N J MID RANGE (2013) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC or — 99/47 �0 128/55 \So5�92152 \�170 13/0/6i, co 32136 -� 13160 -e 3927 N � / oo = --w-- AM/PM Figure 13 21 m 37/109 ��y� n r rn �_ 42/91 ®— gy45 N /—12l79 109/46 t Elizabeth 67/112 43/92 �/ �cpo� 7� 52/44 —� 37/26 r81/131 v0 m v n m 13/60 74/83 o a N 2i°ti �iv116 G9,f f 24/15 D- 62/259 0 26192 �/ Doctors V- B/27 y 10 N p 36/119 � C r- N p lD 07 t4i °J 94/38 24136 a a N 9/3 .� + Garfield 2e/23 5r7 24/28 441126 N r 510 i� o m aCD i ---*-- 0/0 /r— 9/11 Robertson �/ r W 1 1/0 O u] N v m n �Qa �116/118 `D ' f 5261662 125/203 Prospect 1681159 `� IN 565/631 — ► 71/113 rn rn m GO fV T c0N C N J SHORT RANGE (2009) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ® AM/PM Figure 12 20 Garfi( E a� J FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 5 Figure 11 19 Gaff E a� J PHASES 1-3 (2009) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC G Figure 10 18 Son 50 — 55/125 a 125/140 1 /— 20n 10 1 ooiao Elizabeth salso �/ 120/125 y �\so?s�2o 70/60 —�- aorao 1s1550 Qo LO p � 15/so m CD 90/115 � ° `O in o p N � LO N p Ln m i� �0 c c'S' 3 o 75/120 O G9� �—CD 1a10 a `�-- 65/270 0 15140 1 r Doctors r 5/15 —� 0 20/50 mo eo N 1n N pp � � N [h 2 p 75/30 O O ,� �. - ;a5° Garrield 3025 5/10- f 25130 —� to � in 40/100 � p 0 ,� p �n co 5/5 Z ,n 8 N 0 N_ N �$ p '5is 0 0 NOM �10/10 Robertson NOM o Ln to 10/10 to v o N co AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles O 1- p co a Q 1851190 v N 00 � f s�s/11oo } ,r— 205/335 Prospect 220/z15 - -Ii 935/1045 -y M in p 90/145 `° _N O p T f6 E N J LONG RANGE (2030) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 9 17 W) NIT In co ' M \ L 39/113 1 15182 Elizabeth 70/117 --� � f 54/46 —a- 63n9 ; o CO N � �� N 75/121 cr> n n J + f 11/8 641270 0 1558 �/ �/ Doctors ch r 4110CD I (O V N m 21150 a rn m O W) N 74/28 G) ' 1a iZ f 25/37 913 1 1 Garfield 29/24 � sn 25P28 —� o m 38M 0.0 5/0 a) o (0 O N �N ID 'S/4 a o } oio + 9/11 Robertson W —10/ 1 /0 —� ara 04 o N m m vo (0 n Ce)(0 �-1os/11s a � a J l 547/689 1301211 Prospect 1461152 -- } 58a/657 co o ao 74/117 m ado M m N T (0 E N J MID RANGE (2013) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 16 aCb 45/96 `So 39/27 r8l/121 BYO co N m 13/60 N O A_ c cyG 9rf m 0_ --a-- AM/PM Figure 8 I Jaa Garfield 28r23 24r28 5/0 37/109 n n Irn 1 — 42191 —12n9 Elizabeth 67/112 52/44 — - v sons((pp— o o , o n 04 O_ U to m \ cr) (Do —72/116 —11/8 62r259 �— 0 15138 f Doctors r 4110� 21/50 COwN a ' C O U) m N 72127 to F1 co -- 2a/36 913 5,7 '� f a o 37/96 —� Z � r � N (D O 5/4 a �— 010 I �9/11 Robertson / mm 1/0 e/8 o CN aN �O � C] 0 102/111 J — 5261662 125/203 Prospect 1411146 I'M f 565/631 N N 71/113 - rn m rn° m m T E d J SHORT RANGE (2009) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC a �— 95/45 ^ 4 96139 \ r c� 43/92 y ) I —�/ `o 37/26 77/114 �Qo N m 13/60 N v y c �JC" 7G 0 94 w m a- --a— AM/PM Figure 7 15 GarfiE TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 14 Trip Distribution Trip distribution f estimated using knowledge development trends, other judgment. Figure 6 shows traffic assignment. The the scoping meeting. )r the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus was of the existing and planned street system, traffic study in the area, and engineering the trip distribution used for the peak hour trip distribution analysis was discussed in Background Traffic Projections Figures 7, 8, and 9, show the respective short range (2009), mid range (2013), and long range (2030) background traffic projections. Historic counts and the "North Front Range Regional Transportation Plan" were used to forecast traffic growth at the key intersections. Trip Assignment/Total Traffic Projections Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figures 10 and 11 show the Phases 1-3 (2009) and Full Development site generated peak hour traffic assignment of the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus. Figures 12, 13, and 14 show the respective short range (2009), mid range (2013), and long range (2030) total (site plus background) peak hour traffic at the key intersections with the .development of the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus. Signal Warrants Signal warrants were not rigorously analyzed in this TIS. The Lemay/Prospect, Lemay/Robertson, Lemay/Doctors, and Lemay/Elizabeth intersections are signalized. The other key intersections do not meet signal warrant or spacing requirements. Operation Analysis Operation analyses were performed at the key intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range, mid range, and long range analysis reflecting a year 2009, 2013, and 2030, respectively. It is the desire of the City of Fort Collins to combine the Elizabeth/Patton and Elizabeth/McHugh stop sign controlled intersections into one roundabout controlled intersection. It is unlikely that this would occur by/before the short range (2009) future. Therefore, a roundabout intersection was analyzed for the mid range (2013) and long range (2030) total peak hour traffic forecasts. 13 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus is located in various quadrants of the Lemay/Doctors intersection in Fort Collins. Figure 5 shows a site plan of the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus. The site plan provided by the planning consultant shows the general layout of the site with the anticipated phasing program. The site plan shows access to the site at existing driveways and intersections. The short range analysis (year 2009) includes development of phases 1, 2, and 3 of the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus and an appropriate increase in background traffic due to normal growth and other potential developments in the area. The mid range analysis (2013) includes development of all of the phases of the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus. The long range analysis year is 2030. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 7t'' Edition, ITE, was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis: TABLE 2 Trip Generation eM. <.,�'f}Ft sC;4< uv N :'r Yizy.5a d4.9<tC >,�w �,$u ,eatS.a?ii1y153r o i. j - U iq.t, Phase 1 610 Surgical 19.0 KSF 17.57 1 330 0.80 15J 0.40 1 8 1 0.39 7 0.79 15 Phase 2 N/A Emergency Department Renovation No New Trips Phase 3 N/A Parking Garage No New Trips, Reallocated Trips Subtotal Phases 1-3 335 15 8 7 15 Phase 4 720 Medical Office 60.0 KSF 36.13 12170 1.96 1 118 0.52 31 1.00 60 2.72 163 Phase 5 N/A Central Ublity Plant Relocation No New Trips Phase 6 610 New Pafient Bed Tower 1 182.0 KSF 17.57 3200 0.80 146 0.40 73 0.39 71 0.79 144 Subtotal Phases 4-6 5370 264 104 131 307 Total Full Development 5700 1 1 279 1 112 138 322 11 0 Bicycle Facilities Bicycle lanes exist within the cross section of Lemay Avenue, Pitkin Street, and Elizabeth Street. The Fort Collins Bike Map shows Lemay Avenue, Pitkin Street, and Elizabeth Street as "streets with bike lanes." Transit Facilities This area is served by transit route 5. 10 Continued from previous page TABLE I Current Peak Hour Operation rsecffion-�,, Intersection Level S#M*' AIC TM, Lemay/Doctors (signal) EB LT D C EB T/RT D C EB APPROACH D C \IVB LT D D WB T/RT D C WB APPROACH D D NB LT A A NB A A NBRT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT A B SB T/RT A C SB APPROACH A C OVERALL A B Lemay/Elizabeth (signal) EB LT C C EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D D .WB LT D C WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D D NB LT A C NB T/RT C C NB APPROACH B C SB LT A 8 SB T/RT B C SB APPROACH B C OVERALL B C Elizabeth/Patton (stop sign) NB LT/RT B B WB LT A A Garfield/Robertson (all -way stop) EB LT A A EB RT A A EB APPROACH A A SWB LT/RT A A NWB LT A A NWBRT A A NWB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A TABLE I Current Peak Hour Operation Intersection ' ........ . . 9�ovement:. Level qe,: Lemay/Prospect (signal) EB LT C D EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D D WB LT C D WBT D D WB RT C C WB APPROACH D D NB LT 8 D NB C C NB RT B B NB APPROACH c C SB LT C C SBT C C SB RT B A SB APPROACH C C OVERALL C C Lemay/Robertson (signal) EB LT D D EB T/RT D D EB APPROACH D D WB LT D D WB T/RT D D WB APPROACH D D NB LT A A NB T/RT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT A A SB T/RT A A SB APPROACH A A OVERALL A A Lemay/Garfield (stop sign) EB LT/RT B C NB LT B C Garfield/Robertson (stop sign) EB LTrr/RT A A WB LTrr/RT A A NB LTrF/RT A A SB LTrr/RT A A Continued on next page I 1 W It co 0 �-109/98 TL25/119 91 /34 Elizabeth ssnos f 97/11s 62/49 —� �om 3srzs — rf"41� s1n1 —� oar ey � G9.5 arn� 70/113iz + 3/4 W2552 � p 0/14 !T 1 r DOCtOfS I I 'C 0/2 y M � O 0 1/20� m� g m . 0 49/15 N O ` � �1 1a f 1 �9M JN / 1 Garfield z7rz2 } sn 77 ) f 23/28 s/o� M o M a o 27n3 00to LO � cCD l. n r' 8/6 �— 0/0 15/18 / Robertson Y7�/ 1/0y cc co m 8/8 N �i m I OCNILD 99/108 CO 511/643 11/197 Prospect 6 691110 co a� J BALANCED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 7 ® AM/PM Figure 4 Iq ti e C c — 36/106 - IT " co �--47/100 109/% � J l 25/119 91 /34 Elizabeth 65/109 ` 97/116 F7,3/680 Q°62/49 -� 36/2551n1CV m m ��70/113 G9ij I� I� o — 314 a /-- 60/252 0 0114 f Doctors Cn C 012 y cn N o 1 /20 Q? CD 1 O � 49/15 2Y-15 CD 9/3 Garfe27/22 � 23r28 27n3 —� cr)vto v 5/0 rn o to o a n m 8/6 �- 0/0 J i 15/18 Robertson 3/7 ---i } I _m M 0 ® AM/PM -rZCD O N in N o °f o 99/108 —511/643 J 1 �121/1197 Prospect 137/142 f 548/612 69/110 n v ao T m E N J RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 6 Doctors Lane is to the north (adjacent to) of the PVH Lemay Campus site. It is classified as a local street according to the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Doctors Lane lines up with an access that will become the entrance to a parking garage with the expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus. This access currently serves the employee parking lot. The Lemay/Doctors intersection has signal control. Elizabeth Street is to the north of the PVH Lemay Campus site. It is classified as a two-lane collector street according to the Fort Collins Master Street plan. Currently, Elizabeth Street has a two-lane cross section. The Lemay/Elizabeth intersection has signal control. Existing Traffic Recent peak hour.traffic counts at the key existing intersections are shown in Figure 3. The traffic data for the- Lemay/Elizabeth intersection was collected by the City in March 2006. The traffic data for the other key intersections was collected in November 2006. Raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix A. Since counts were performed on different days, the traffic volumes between the intersections were balanced and are shown in Figure 4. Existing Operation The counted intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 4, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. The key intersections operate acceptably during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. The Expansion of the PVH Lemay Campus site is in an area termed "employment district." An "employment district" would fall into the "All Other Corridors" category_ In "All Other Corridors," the acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better, overall. Intersection legs and movements can operate at level of service E. At unsignalized intersections, the minimum level of service is E (considered to be normal during the peak hours) at arterial/collector or arterial/local intersections and level of service C at collector/local intersections. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing. the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix B. Pedestrian Facilities There are pedestrian facilities along most streets in this area. Sidewalks will be incorporated within and adjacent to this development. 5 0 N N O Garfield ltl'Doctors Robertson Prospect T E N J CURRENT INTERSECTION GEOMETRY 4 - Denotes Lane Figure 2 SCALE: 1"=1000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the PVH Lemay Campus is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily residential, commercial (primarily medical office), or institutional (hospital). There are residential uses to the south, east, and west of the site. There are commercial uses to the north. The center of Fort Collins lies to the west of the PVH Lemay Campus. Land adjacent to the site is flat (<2% grade) from a traffic operations perspective. The PVH Lemay Campus is in an area termed "employment district." Roads The primary streets near the PVH Lemay Campus site are Lemay Avenue, Prospect Road, Robertson Street, Garfield Street, Doctors Lane, and Elizabeth Street. The current intersection geometry is shown in Figure 2. The following descriptions are based upon a site visit and the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Lemay Avenue is adjacent to the PVH Lemay Campus site. It is classified as a four -lane arterial according to the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Lemay Avenue has a four -lane cross section. The existing speed limit in this area of Lemay Avenue is 40 mph. Prospect Road is to the south (approximately 0.3 miles) of the PVH Lemay Campus site. It is classified as a four -lane arterial. according to the Fort Collins Master Street plan. Currently, Prospect Road has a four -lane cross section. The Lemay/Prospect intersection has signal control. The existing speed limit in this area of Prospect Road is 35 mph. Robertson Street is to the west of the PVH Lemay Campus site. It is classified as a local street according to the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Robertson Street lines up with the emergency entrance to the PVH Lemay Campus. The Lemay/Robertson intersection has signal control. There is also a short segment of Robertson Street, west of the existing employee parking lot, between Garfield Street and Elizabeth Street. Garfield Street is to the west of the PVH Lemay Campus site. It is classified as a local street according to the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. The Lemay/Garfield intersection has stop sign control on Garfield Street. V 0 I. INTRODUCTION This full transportation impact study (TIS) addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed expansion of the Poudre Valley Hospital (PVH) Lemay Campus. The PVH Lemay Campus is located in the southeast quadrant of the Lemay/Doctors intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planner (BHA Design), the project architect (Davis Partnership), the project owner (Poudre Valley Health System), and the City of Fort Collins staff. This study conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines as contained in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards" (LCUASS). A Base Assumptions Form and related information are provided in Appendix A. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation; trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. 1 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Current Intersection Geometry ........................ 4 3. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 6 4. Balanced Recent Peak Hour Traffic .................... 7 5. Site Plan ................................ `............ 12 6. Trip Distribution .................................... 14 7. Short Range (2009) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 15 S. Mid Range (2013) Background Peak Hour Traffic ........ 16 9. Long Range (2030) Background Peak Hour Traffic ....... 17 10. Phases 1-3 (2009) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ... 18 11. Full Development Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic .... 19 12. Short Range (2009) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........... 20 13. Mid Range (2013) Total Peak Hour Traffic ............. 21 14. Long Range (2030) Total Peak Hour Traffic ............ 22 15. Short Range (2009) and Mid Range (2013) Geometry ..... 36 16. Long Range (2030) Geometry ........................... 38 APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form/Peak Hour Traffic Counts B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions C Short Range Background Traffic Operation D Mid Range Background Traffic Operation E Long Range Background Traffic Operation F Short Range Total Traffic Operation G Mid Range Total Traffic Operation H Long Range Total Traffic Operation I Pedestrian Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Roads................................................ 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 5 Existing Operation ................................... 5 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 5 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 10 Transit Facilities ................................... 10 III. Proposed Development ................................. 11 Trip Generation ...................................... 11 Trip Distribution .................................... 13 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 13 Trip Assignment/Total Traffic Projections ............ 13 Signal Warrants......................................13 Operation Analysis .................................... 13 Roundabout Analysis .................................. 23 Geometry............................................. 23 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 37 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 37 Transit Level of Service ............................. 37 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 39 LIST OF,TABLES Table Page 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 8 2. Trip Generation......................................11 3. Short Range (2009) Background Peak Hour Operation ....24 4. Mid Range (2013) Background Peak Hour Operation ..... 26 5. Long Range (2030) Background Peak Hour Operation ..... 28 6. Short Range (2009) Total Peak Hour Operation .........30 7. Mid Range (2013) Total Peak Hour Operation ........... 32 8. Long Range (2030) Total Peak Hour Operation ......... 34 EXPANSION OF THE PVH LEMAY CAMPUS TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2007 Prepared for: Poudre Valley Health System 1024 South Lemay Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 • \�Y �L�°e 7� 0