HomeMy WebLinkAboutWILMARC MEDICAL - FDP - FDP170005 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - REVISIONSdefined and dimensioned. A plant list of proposed species has been shown. Per
FDP submittal requirement 8.a individual plants shall be shown in planting beds. This
information has been provided with the FDP plans.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: The sidewalk connection to precision could be moved to the west.
Sidewalk connection has been added as a direct route per code to from Precision
sidewalk to building entry.
Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, Dwrav(cDfcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: A neighborhood meeting is scheduled for November 17, 2016 for this
project. The delay for holding this meeting was approved by Planning previously.
Neighborhood meeting held November 17, 2016.
Page 16 of 12
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, w1amaraue0fcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: Please provide water usage calculations to verify the 1 1/2 inch water
service and meter are adequate.
Refer to attached preliminary fixture unit tabulation and service size worksheet.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: The fire hydrant at the north end of the building acts as a long dead end
and may present poor water quality issues. Discussion needs to take place to
explore if there is a better location or option for an additional hydrant.
Shear Response.' The Are hydrant location accommodates Poudre Fire Authority fie main size has been
increased to an 8" main to the fire hydrant connection. Master Utility Plan construction notes have been
updated accordingly.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals0fcoov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: The signature block for Planning on the site plan needs to match the
signature block on the plat.
Signature block has been updated to match plat.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: Please provide and overall site plan on one sheet.
Overall site plan has been added as sheet LS100 that shows both lots
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: The landscape sheets and lighting plan sheets need to be included on
the sheet index of the site plan, where the signature block is.
Landscape, Architectural elevations and lighting will be added to cover sheet prior to
going to recorded set. This saves the costs of printing sheets for routing that do not need
to be viewed by every department. We will send both you and Jeff County a final
compiled PDF for approval prior to printing mylars.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: Need to include a management plan to establish the seed mix areas
Noted, will be included with FDP submittal.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: A full tree stocking is required on the west and south landscaped areas
of the building.
Per section 3.2.1. D. c parking lot and street trees within 50' of the building may be
counted toward full tree stocking requirements. Planting beds are required to be a
minimum of 7' from building face, WilMarc Medical provides 10-20' wide beds adjacent to
building. Building perimeter is 1, 365 LF = 34 required trees (17 canopy trees min. for
509/6) 19 canopy trees are provided within 50' of building in street ROW and parking
islands. 21 ornamental and evergreen trees have been provided for a total of 40 trees.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: The planting beds need to include more details.
Per requirement 5. a of the PDP submittal requirements shrub beds only need to be
Page 15 of 12
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines.
Legal description changed.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please change the title block on all sheets as marked. See redlines.
Titleblock changed.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are
going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat.
Description has been updated to match plat.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: There are match line issues. See redlines.
Matchline sheet prefix has been added.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 1800. See redlines.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: There appears to be an off site pedestrian path adjacent to the
property, connecting into that path be beneficial to the project site pedestrian traffic.
Connection has been added to property line. Developer for detention area trail shall
connect to WilMarc trail at time of detention pond trail construction.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: The conclusions in the traffic study indicate that a signal is warranted
at Harmony and Technology Parkway. We will need a signal warrant study and
professional recommendation to accompany the study if the study is suggesting
that this development will trigger the need for the signal at this time. If this is not
what the study is suggesting than the traffic study conclusions can be reviewed and
revised. We are available to meet and discuss this further upon request.
Refer to updated/supplemental traffic information.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson(&fcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 10/31/2016
10/31/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit.
The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of
the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric
Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Acknowledged.
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Page 14 of 12
11/04/2016: Please add new title commitment information if available. You could be
potentially liable for any documents recorded since this date.
Edmonds Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please add bearings & distances as marked. See redlines.
Edmonds Response: Searingand distance added.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please clarify if the 10' Drainage, Utility & Access Easement is on or off
site, and why a separate document is needed. See redlines.
Edmonds Response. It is actually a 20' wide easement in this area, 10' being on either side of the north
line of Lot 1. This is the same Drainage, Utility and Access Easement that is located east of Lot 1 and
North of Lot 2 (pond site). Edmonds Land Surveying /nc, prepared the legal description and exhibit for
this D, U and AE for Aspen Engineering and MA We velopement for the Pond site. Edmonds has been told
the Easement has been submitted to the City but has yet to be recorded, therefore the reception nois not
available yet.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Is the arrow (marked) in the right location for the Utility & Drainage
Easement. See redlines.
Edmonds Response: Yes, this easement is described in response to Comments 5 and 10,
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please label the Point Of Beginning.
Edmonds Response: Added
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: A detail of the southwest corner of the property would be helpful. See
redlines.
Edmonds Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate document,
must be added prior to producing mylars.
Edmonds Response: Once the off -site easements are recorded, Reception Numbers will be added.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Is the remainder of Lot 2, Harmony Technology Park, Second Filing going
to be a D,U&AE? Please show the limits of the new D,U&AE on this plat.
Edmonds Response The remainder of Lot 2, Harmony Technology Park Second Filing is not a D, U B AE.
This label is for an Easement that Edmonds Land Surveying prepared the legal and exhibit for Aspen
Engineerirrgand MAVDevelopment forthe Pond Site. (Same as described in CommentNumber5)
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11 /04/2016: All easements must be labeled & locatable. If the easements east of the
property are not relevant to the plat, please remove. See redlines.
Edmonds Response Acknowledged and remaining easements of Lot 2, Harmony TechnologyPark Second
Filing as shown on the recorded plat have been removed for clarity. The only off -site easement shown will
be for the Pond Site (see response to Comments No. Sand 10)
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11 /04/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 1800. See redlines.
Edmonds Response Revised
Page 13 of 12
Sheeigamw Plans have been revised as directed.
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to
stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat.
SheeiPlans have been revised so all easements are consistent with the easements noted on the
final plat
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Is the right of way line shown along Precision Drive the original right of way
line, or the new line after the 2' of right of way is dedicated? See redlines.
Shear Response /t is the 2' of new dedicated right-of-way. Please note that we have formalized the
Precision Drive typical sheet section on the Typical Section sheet of the Final Utility Plans to clarify the
additional right-of-way and location of the new detached walk to accommodate a!/staff comments.
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
ShearResoonse Acknowledged and accommodated.
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 180°. See redlines.
SheaiAcknowledged and accommodated.
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas.
See redlines.
SheiarResnonse Acknowledged and accommodated.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines.
Legal description changed.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please change the title block on all sheets as marked. See redlines.
Title block changed.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: There are match line issues. See redlines.
Sheet number prefix has been added.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please change the title block on all sheets as marked. See redlines.
Refer to revised sheet.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please add the missing note "There shall be no private.... of the City Code.".
Edmonds Resoonse Note added.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
Page 12 of 12
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamaraue(a)fcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: Please discuss how each regional pond taking flows for the site is able
to detain the flows and that the impervious area and acreage is equal to or less than
what was planned.
ShearResponse Referto revised calculations and summary ofhistonc and current basin areas.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: The storm sewer taking flows from the inlet in Technology Parkway is
required to be in a 20-ft wide drainage easement. discussion needs to take place if
this alignment is the best option for future maintenance.
Shear Response: Plans have been revised and easement has been shown on the final Utility Plans and
coordinated with the final plat based on discussions and decisions conceming this item made in our
Tuesday, November22, 2016 meeting with staff.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Stormwater is ready for a hearing. Additional comments will follow
during final compliance.
ShearResponse' Thankyou. As discussed at our Tuesday, November22, 2016 meeting with staff we %l be
comp/etinggrading revisions at the south end of the building at fDP. The pmposedgrading and drainage
concept will not change. We are adjusting those grades so flows are conveyed belowgrade instead of the
swa/e.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty fcaov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please change the title block on all sheets as marked. See redlines.
Refer to revised sheets.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 23
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement
in the EXACT format shown below.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.
SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED FOR
THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE
FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88
- X.XX'.
Page 11 of 12
11/02/2016: Add full landscape plan on LP003, adjust sheets accordingly.
Full landscape plan has been added as sheet LP100.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: LP101/LP102- Need more detail on landscape planting for building
foundations and perimeter near parking and trash enclosure areas for more full tree
and shrub design.
Per requirement 5. a of the PDP submittal requirements shrub beds only need to be
defined and dimensioned. A plant list of proposed species has been shown. Per
FDP submittal requirement 8.a individual plants shall be shown in planting beds.
Individual plants have been show with quantities for FDP submittal.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Need correct plat for hearing to include lot 1 and or 2.
,EdmondsResponse The platis to include both Lots 1 and2.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: LS001- Add notes and table from LS002 to this cover sheet.
Notes and charts have been put on sheet LS100 with overall site plan
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: LS002- Add a full rendering of site plan on this sheet to include both
parcels.
An overall site has been shown on LS100 and LP100 that depicts both parcels.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: LS101/LS102- Clarify timing and responsibility for developing
connecting trail as identified on ODP. If not part of this PDP, show sidewalk
connection to east property line for future trail link.
A walk has been added to property for future connection to detention pond trail.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Tech Pkwy frontage, move 5' sidewalk to abut ROW and property line.
Sidewalk has been moved to align with ROW
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischlamta�fcaov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 10/25/2016
10125/2016'. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet
requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (Based upon redlines), an
Erosion Control Report (Based upon comments), and an Escrow / Security
Calculation (Recalculated based upon redlines and comments). Also, based upon
the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will be required since the site
is over an acre. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if
there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @
jschlam@fcgov.com
shear Final Drainage, Sedimentl&osion Control and Stormwater Quality Report has been
revised accordingly.
Page 10 of 12
1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than 300 feet to the building,
on 600-foot centers thereafter.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: FIRE LANE SIGNS
The limits of the fire lane shall be fully defined. Fire lane sign locations should be
indicated on future plan sets. The fire lane sign detail (diagram 1418) currently shown
on the plan is an outdated version. Please update with current detail. Code language
provided below.
IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads
shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING - FIRE LANE signs complying with
Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches wide by 18
inches high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be
posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section
D103.6.1 or D103.6.2.
shearResoonse The limits of all fire Janes are now included and labeled on the Final Utility Plans. Fire lane
sign locations are now noted on the Final Utility plans with installation construction note included with the
Masterlmpmyements Plan.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: FDC
> IFC 912.2: Fire Department Connections shall be installed in accordance with NFPA
standards. Fire department connections shall be located on the street side of buildings,
fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle
access. The location of the FDC shall be approved by the fire department.
Acknowledged
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11102/2016: GENERAL
Further PFA comments may arise at Building Permit Stage
Understood.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, wrav fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: Need to show details of building materials on plans such as type of
brick and color so full spectrum of finishes can be reviewed.
Refer to colored elevations for depiction of intended color and material palette.
Topic: General
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: A neighborhood meeting is scheduled for November 17, 2016 for this
project. The delay for holding this meeting was approved by Planning previously.
Neighborhood Meeting was held on November 17, 2016.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Need revised plans relating to comments 1,2,4,9 for hearing. if this
warrants another formal round of review let us know, or a PDF round.
Revised plans were submitted Nov 28t' after a staff meeting on Nov 22nd with
planning, engineering and stormwater staff to discuss comments and revisions.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
Page 9 of 12
11/01/2016: You may contact FCU Light & Power, project engineering if you have
questions. (970) 221-6700. You may reference Light & Power's Electric Service
Standards at
http://www.fcgov. com/util ities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStandards_F
INAL_17June2016.pdf
You may reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee
estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, ilvnxwiler(aiooudre-fire.ora
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 10/27/2016
10/31/2016: 2015 IFC CODE ADOPTION
The Poudre Fire Authority and the City of Fort Collins are in the process of adopting
the 2015 International Fire Code. Building plan reviews shall be subject to the
adopted version of the fire code in place at the time of plan review submittal and
permit application.
Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 10/27/2016
10/31/2016: FIRE AERIAL ACCESS
Aerial Fire Apparatus access is required for structures over 30ft in height which is
measured to the top of parapet walls. From the provided plan elevations, a large
proportion of the building appears to be over 30ft in height thereby triggering Aerial
Apparatus standards. Code language provided below:
WHERE REQUIRED:
> IFC D105.1: Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof
surface exceeds 30 feet, approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided.
For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by
measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior
wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater.
WIDTH:
> IFC D105.2; FCLUC 3.6.2(B)2006, and Local Amendments: Aerial fire apparatus
access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 30 feet, exclusive of
shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof.
PROXIMITY TO BUILDING:
IFC D105.3: At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall
be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building,
and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the
building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be
approved by the fire code official.
Typical high parapet walls at warehouse have been revised to 29'-0" (three foot
reduction) and low parapet walls at warehouse have been revised to 27'-0"
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 10/31/2016
10/31/2016: WATER SUPPLY
Hydrant spacing and flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of
occupancy. A hydrant is required at 600' intervals along Technology Parkway which
would indicate the addition of another hydrant being installed in conjunction with this
project. Code language provided below.
> IFC 507.5 and PFA Policy: COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENTS: Hydrants to provide
Page 8 of 12
Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI Al 17.1-2009.
Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.
Frost Depth: 30 inches.
Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B.
Seismic Design: Category B.
Climate Zone: Zone 5
Energy Code Use
1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC.
2. Multi -family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter.
3. Commercial and Multi -family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter.
Acknowledged.
Wilmarc — project specific concerns:
1. Fire -sprinkler systems or fire -containment is required for buildings over 5000
sq.ft.
2. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling.
3. Low -flow Watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are
required.
4. Low VOC interior finishes.
Acknowledged.
City of Fort Collins
Building Services
Plan Review
416-2341
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Coy Althoff, , CAlthoff(cDfcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: Light & Power will has electric facilities running along both Technology
Pkwy and Precision Dr. that can be utilized to serve this proposed building.
Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: Development charges, electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges
and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this development.
Acknowleged.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: As your project begins to move forward please contact Light and
Power Engineering to coordinate the streetlight, transformer and electric meter
locations, please show the locations on the utility plans.
Shear Response: Thank you for providing the City Light and Power electr/c p/an. Proposed street light
locations on Technology Parkwayare nownoted on the plans.
Shear The on -site electric transformer has been noted on the plans previously submitted for
review and meet the specific specifications noted. We will include the transformer detail prov/ded 0n
Detail008 ESS-8.1 included in the Ci" Electric Service Standards referenced.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
11/01/2016: Please provide a one line diagram and a C-1 form to Light and Power
Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at:
http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWikiANikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 11/01/2016
Page 7 of 12
Typically locations to consider for their use do not include overly exposed or dry
locations. Forestry requests that an alternative canopy shade tree on the Street Tree
List be placed where Caddo Maples are shown in parkways as street trees. Caddo
Maples presently placed in lawn areas off parkways on private property are okay.
Caddo Maples have been moved onto property at entrances.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016:
Minimum Species Diversity
Please check quantities of species used for compliance with the Land Use Code —
minimum species diversity. Please list percentages of each tree species under the
Plant Schedule.
Percentages have been provided on landscape legend under all of the tree
species listed. A border has been added to emphasize. This was discussed
previously that redo the number for each species is tedious, an overall maximum
per species number has been provided instead to ensure no species is over the
maximum 15% allowed.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016:
Please list all trees as balled and burlapped.
B&B noted on legend.
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland(o)fcaov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11 /02/2016:
Building Permit Pre -Submittal Meeting:
Pre -Submittal meetings are required to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early
on in the design,
that the new commercial or multi -family projects are on track to complying with all of
the adopted City
codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to
mid -design stage for
this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning
conceptual review
meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi -family projects are advised to call
416-2341 to schedule
a pre -submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor
plans, and elevations
and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of
construction being proposed.
Acknowledged.
Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended:
2012 International Building Code (IBC)
2012 International Residential Code (IRC)
2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado
2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com
web page to view them.
Acknowledged.
Page 6 of 12
11/02/2016: More detail needed on lighting plan and manufacture cut -sheets. Clarify
on plans which bulbs will be selected i.e. 2500K, 3000K etc. Staff requests 3000K or
below especially for any LED lights due to resident complaints and recommended
specifications by the International Dark Skies Association and the American Medical
Association.
Lighting plan revisions requested will be submitted at FDP submittal.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(aWcaov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016:
There are currently only 2 species of street trees on the plan. Please increase street
tree diversity by using around 4 different species. Suggestions of trees can be found
on the Street Tree List.
Street trees species have been increased to include: Redmond Linden,
Shademaster Honeylocust, Texas Red Oak and Chinkapin Oak.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11104/2016:
Please display any locations of street lights and stop signs and provide code
required separation figures.
Street lights and stop signs have been added, separation requirements met for
trees and noted on plans.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016:
The first tree on Precision Drive from Technology Parkway appears to be too close
to the corner and may cause visibility issues. Please evaluate not including this tree
for improvement of intersection visibility.
Tree has been moved to allow for better visibility.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11 /04/2016:
If there are any existing trees within the property lines, please contact the City
Forester for an onsite meeting to obtain tree inventory and mitigation information for
landscape plans. Existing significant trees should be retained to the extent
reasonably feasible.
No existing trees are on site.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016:
Explore adding additional appropriate ornamental and conifer trees where feasible in
planting beds and in wider lawn areas along Precision Drive and Technology
Parkway.
Additional ornamental trees have been added in planting beds along Technology.
Lawn areas have been widened with sidewalk being pushed to R.O.W.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016'.
Species selection
Greenspire Lindens typically do not survive or thrive well in parking lot islands and
peninsulas. Please evaluate changing Lindens in these locations for better adapted
shade trees. The City Forester suggests Kentucky Coffeetree would be a good
canopy tree for these locations.
Kentucky Coffeetrees have replaced lindens in parking lot islands.
Caddo Maples are still being evaluated for their range of adaptability in Fort Collins.
Page 5of12
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: What is the two parallel lines that cross into the utility easement behind
Technology Parkway right-of-way? Is this a drainage pan? Just looking to ensure this
isn't a potential conflict in the utility easement.
ShearResaonse These fines were drain pan lines. The plans have been revisedand clanAed.
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Comment #1 from Sheri Langenberger references the need for additional
fee pertaining to the platting of Lot 2 and its acreage not being included in the associated
fee. If the reason to plat Lot 2 was motivated by needing to have Lots 1 & 2 as part of
the land purchase from the overall land owner, this should be discussed further. The
City wouldn't require that Lot 2 be platted at this time and if removed from the plat, the
additional fee would not be required. Since the plat is presented at public hearing,
verification on whether Lot 2 will be included or not is a pre -hearing item.
$beaiReglOnse Acknowledged. We preferto platLot2. Please advise the additional fee required.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11 /04/2016: In addition to the question of the platting/fees of Lot 2, the other
pre -hearing item is the showing of the sidewalk along Technology Parkway
extending further north to cover the common area, and the sidewalk shown abutting the
right-of-way (if the applicant is amenable to this).
Shear Sidewalk along Technolo&Parkwayhas been extended 20 feet past the north boundary
to the north side of the 20-foot drainage/access/utility easement as requested.
SbeaiWe have the moved proposed Technology Parkway detached walk adjacent to the right-
of-way as requested in Comment 9 below resuftingin an 11.50'parkway width. Refer to Sheet 5.• Typical
Street Sections.
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slanaenberaerOfcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: the project owes an additional $1,173.26 for TDRF PDP fees. The total
acreage being platted was not used in the submitted calculations.
Noted.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak(aUcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: Memo ECS received. Environmental Planning concurs with consultant
no natural habitat buffer zone extending onto property. Thank you.
Noted.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
11/02/2016: Include scientific names for seed to be applied in bioswale. Seeding
rate and specifications for proper installation needed as well. If the proposed project
is approved, highly recommend ensuring a qualified, experienced contractor installs
the bioswale.
Seed mix names are called out in legend with percentages of each species. Seeding
rate has been added.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/02/2016
Page 4 of 12
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: The indication on Sheet 4 Note 3 is the installation of residential local street
approach 1606a for the two driveways. These driveways should instead be designed
and referenced with LCUASS detail 707.1 or 707.2. The radii for the driveways should
be 15 feet in accordance with LCUASS Table 8-2.
shearResoonse Access drives have been graphically updated to represent fifteen -foot tit ) return radii.
Master Improvements Plan construction notes have been revised accordingly to identify the requited
fifteen -foot (15 J radius and LCUASS detail 707.1. LUCASS detail 707.1 was afieadyon the detail sheet.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: We'll want to take a closer look at the driveways and whether they direct
drainage across the sidewalk. No more than 750 square feet of sheet flow drainage area
is allowed across the sidewalk from behind a driveway.
51#Mlr There is no sheetf/owrunoffcrossingthenorthTechnolo&Parkwayaccessdrive.Thereis
now no runoff entering Precision Drive. Lowering the building required design changes to the drive
resu/tingin all runoff from the Precision Drive back of walk to remain on site.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: While not technically required, I'm wondering with the additional 1 foot
behind the sidewalk for Technology Parkway, whether the applicant would consider
either detaching the sidewalk one foot further east for a wider parkway, (or providing a 6
foot sidewalk that then abuts the right-of-way line.) The trees within the parkway have
increased viability with the additional width, and the area behind the back of walk that's
right-of-way can't be utilized otherwise.
ShearResnonse Please referto response to Comment Number 5. We have the moved proposed detached
walk adiacent to the right-of-way as requested resulting in an 11.50' parkway width. Refer to Sheet 5.-
Typical Street Sections.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: We'll want verification as to whether MAVD/Harmony Technology Park
LLC will remain the owner of the property throughout the entitlement of the project, or
whether WilMarc Medical LLC will seek to acquire title to the property prior to the final
plan approval. This will have implications on both the development agreement as well
as site plan/plat signatures. While information on the plans is a little unclear as to
whether work is occurring offsite of the development plan boundary, vs. being built by
the master developer as part of the infrastructure plan set, the fact that all work appears
to be in land currently owned by MAVD/Harmony Technology Park LLC, no letters of
intent for offsite easements appears to be needed.
Letter of intent for trail construction by MA VD was provided to Pete Wray on Nov 28"'.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: I'm wondering why the project would not provide some sort of connection to
the abutting trail that abuts the regional pond. It would seem like an amenity that the end
users would look to access, but there's no corresponding pathway to do so.
A trail connection has been added at the north end of the truck loading area.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: The plat calls out an emergency access easement for the main drive aisle
internal to the project, however this does not appear to be labelled on the plans.
Shear Response The easement was labeled 24' Access, Utility and Drainage easement on both the
Master Utility Plan and the Master Improvements Plan. However we have re -renamed and re -labeled the
easement on both plans Z4' EmerrrWA=m & Ulff& Dwnaoe and Awess 0&UDA1 easement" to
match the plat. Easement lines and dimension has also been added. We have coordinated this label with
the final PLATAND THES/te Plan so allare consistent.
Page 3 of 12
Padrwaytypicalsbeetsection noted byAspen Engineering on Sheet28 of47ofthe U6lityPlans forharmony
Technology Park Infrastructure Improvements; Aspen Engineering Aspen Project No. 100-002, Plans dated
04118119, City Engineer approval date: 05109116. Note that the street is 52' wide (50' wide typical 2-
lane collector) in an existing 85' right-of-way. We have the moved proposed detached walk adjacent to the
right-of-way as requested in Comment 9 below resulting in an 11.50' parkway width. Refer to Sheet 5.-
Typical Street Sections.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: The indication on Sheet 4 Note 11 is that curb and gutter would need to
be removed for the construction of the access ramps. It appears that the curb
openings for the ramps were accommodated for however and there may not be a
need to remove the curb and gutter (and no need for potential associated street
cuts).
ShearThe existing curb andgutterdoes not accommodate directional ramps Refer to the survey
for existing conditions and the followingpicture. To accommodate directional ramps, this section ofexisting
Page 2 of 12
City of
Fort Collins
November 04, 2016
Shelley La Mastra
Russell Mills Studios
141 S. College Ave, Suite 104
Fort Collins, CO 80524
RE: WilMarc Medical, PDP160033, Round Number 1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970,224.6134 - fax
f6gov.com/developmentreview
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for
your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may
contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at
970-221-6754 or pwray@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata fcoov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11 /04/2016: The civil plans are a little difficult to discern between proposed
improvements, existing improvements, existing conditions, etc. Can different
lineweights/linetypes be utilized to provide more distinction?
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Please show the sidewalk along Technology Parkway extending 20 feet
further north to complete the portion in front of the drainage/access/utility easement.
shearResponse Sidewalk along Technolo&Parkwayhas been extended 20 feetpast the north boundaryto
the north side ofthe 20-foot drainage/access/u#lityeasement as requested.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: What is the intent of the plat creating Lot 2, but no associated
development plan shown on the lot?
Sheaf Response: The purpose of creating two (2) lots is for purchase hom the Master developer
MAWevelopment West This is like Harmony Commons where six (6) lots were platted but only three (3) lots
were designed.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/04/2016
11/04/2016: Sheet 5 on the civil set should provide more clarity as to what the
included sections refer to and in general provide cross section information for
Precision Drive and Technology Parkway abutting the property.
ShearResponse' We have formalized the Precision Drive typical street section including the /dentiFoation of
the existing 31 ' one-ha/fright--of way adjacent to this site and the 3ddi1Yona/2' right-of-way for a resultant
33'one-halfnght--of-way. Referto Sheet 5.• Typical StreetSecvons.
$hearResponse' We have formalized the Techno/o&Parkway typicalstreet section to match the Technology
Page 1 of 12