HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY TECH. PARK, HEWLETT-PACKARD - PDP - 12-97D - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYHCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
0 a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Intersection: cambridge/imago
Analyst: matt
Project No.: 0045
Date: 1/4/01 AA s4eP-T
East/West Street: imago
North/South Street: cambridge
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs)
J24k) GCS
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
0.25
Volume 305 75 110 95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 338 83 122 105
Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1 0 1 1
Configuration TR L T
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
volume 1.55 zbu
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 150 311
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0
Percent Grade M 0 0
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists? No
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10
Lane Config L I LR I
v (vph)
122
461
C(m) (vph)
1149
589
Vic
0.11
0.78
95% queue length
0.32
7.00
Control Delay
8.5
29.6
LOS
A
D
Approach Delay
29.6
Approach LOS
D
Eastbound
11 12
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
E-Mail: mdelich@£rii.com
Fax: (970) 669-5034
I�.2 G/V
&oS
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Intersection: cambridge/imago
Analyst: matt
Project No.: 0045
Date: 1/4/01
East/West Street: imago
North/South Street: cambridge
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
95
115
105
295
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
105
127
116
327
Percent Heavy Vehicles
--
--
0
-- --
Median Type TWLTL
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1 0
1 1
Configuration
TR
L T
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement 7
8
9
1 10
11 12
L
T
R
I L
T R
Volume 4b du
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 50 88
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0
Percent Grade M 0 0
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists? No
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config L I LR I
v tvpn)
i�u
��Q
C(m) (vph)
v/c
1348
0.09
650
0.21
n ¢ t �ZS!Z,G�
95% queue length
0.21
0.87
L1�P•
Control Delay
7.9
12.0
Delay
A
12.0
Z S3 s!
Approach
Approach LOS
B
V
71 3
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 L U 5 A
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
U22M"I F
cc
W
J
W
z
Celestica
Colorado
CK CREEK
HP West HP East
Access Access
- N
HRO ARIVIOAD
Imago
A B
Roa A
W
0
G
LLI
m
Q
Road B
Road
C
[E] I I
SHORT RANGE (2007) GEOMETRY
F
Legend:
— - Denotes Lane
Figure 12
N �
N N
0 0 �- 320/595
1O f 1025 1775
1 � % 100/200
280/105 --� t I
1575/1650 -� o 0 0
120/235 ,4
C:) rn r,
N
o W) o
'%-165 135
-15/80
,r-- 20/75
95/55 -j
75/25
5/5 ----N
Celeatica
Colorado
HP West HP East
Access Access
65/15 \o '*A-120/20
—1380/2090 HARMONY N �' N f 1355/1475
L r-75/10 ROAD 130/4'
120/45 `� 1 f I 135/15 -1 }
1850/1940 0 0 0 1475/1905 — un o 0
350/50 265/150
to
U-)�
N Nk-80/280
L r-45/135
Ul) M n A B ` r Imago
o LO C 25/165
CO M � NOM.
) + �, 10/5
Ro
15/105 f A
NOM.
} NOM. -A o =' �
z\�n
O } n
Z�'�
Ua
W '
� N
r � �
n�
CREEK
25/130-! }
20/100--,� o 0
o C-4
m W
Fr w
C mQ
15/0 D U
t0/4ogo
N N �
%�Ro g In
50/90
ed o 1 —10/5
nRoad C�� 1 � - 35/65
70/65
SHORT RANGE (2007) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
E
15/95 ---7
-, t r
5/10 —
Ln Ln o
F
15/75
L o
1
Ln
N
O
� M N
\n n 0 20/10
—10/5
f- 25/10
10/15 --r 1 T r
35 150 -� o o u\i
o�
AM/PM
Rounded to the Nearest
5 Vehicles.
Figure 10
APPENDIX A
CO
C7
C)
O
00
0
a
0
J
0
0
0
z
a
J
W
O�
J
W
0
w
a
z
W
lJn
V
N
n
N
N
W
a
U
J
W
0
W
E
d
Cr)
O
LO
o�
CD
CO
O
r•
rn
u_
CD
O
N
rn
co
co
O
r
rn
W
0
x
a
z
W
W
z
5
z
W
z
0
a
a
0
a
(A
z
Q
Ix
-
oif
LL
4
Q
2
TO: Michael Bello, HP
Angie Milewski, BHA
Dennis Armstrong, MBA
John Tufte, JR Engineering
City of Fort Collins
FROM: Matt Delich ��t1
DATE: January 4, 2001
SUBJECT: HP HTP PDP - Traffic Impact Study revised pages
(File: 0045ME04)
Figures 10 and 12 of the HP Harmony Technology Park PDP
Traffic Impact Study," November 2000, did not show the
Cambridge/Imago intersection. Appendix A contains new versions of
Figure 10 and Figure 12 that can be substituted in the cited traffic
study. In the short range future, this intersection will be a full
movement intersection with stop sign control on the Imago leg. As
indicated in the cited traffic study, this intersection will be
converted to a right-in/right-out intersection when alternative
access is acquired to the Imago site by extending Road A to the east
of Cambridge Avenue. With the interim stop sign control, this
intersection will operate as indicated in Table 1. Calculation forms
are provided in Appendix B. This intersection will operate
acceptably.
TABLE 1
Short Range Total Peak Hour Operation
Intersection
Movement
Level of Service
AM PM
Cambridgetimago
(stop sign)
WB LT/RT
B D
SB LT
A A
OVERALL
A B