HomeMy WebLinkAboutOVERLAND TRAIL 3RD ANNEXATION & ZONING (ENCLAVE) - 16-97 - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO APPLICANTOPTION 5: AMEND THE CITY STRUCTURE PLAN, REQUEST THE NC
ZONE AND REQUEST THE ADDITION OF A PERMITTED USE
TO THE NC ZONE DISTRICT
The property owner may request that convenience stores without the separation
requirement be added to the list of permitted uses for the NC zone district. Such
an addition of a permitted use must comply with Section 1.3.4 of the Land Use
Code, as stated above in Option 3. In addition, a request to zone the property
to the NC zone district would require an amendment to the City Structure Plan.
�1
5. Does the presence of the convenience store require the multi -family
element be considered mixed use housing, and therefore kick the
whole project into type 2 review.
This would not be the case unless the entire project was located on
the same lot.
OPTION 3: ADDITION OF A PERMITTED USE TO
THE MMN ZONE DISTRICT
The property owner may request that convenience stores without the separation
requirement be added to the list of permitted uses for the MMN zone district.
Such an addition of a permitted use must comply with Section 1.3.4 of the Land
Use Code, and must conform to the following conditions:
1. Such use is appropriate to the zone district to which it is added;
2. Such use conforms to the basic characteristics of the zone district and
the other permitted uses in the zone district to which it is added;
3. Such use does not create any more offensive noise, vibration, dust,
heat, smoke, odor, glare, or other objectionable influences or any more
traffic hazards, traffic generation or attraction, adverse environmental
impacts, adverse impacts on public or quasi -public facilities, utilities or
services, adverse effect on public health, safety, morals, or aesthetics,
or other adverse impacts of development, than the amount normally
resulting from the other permitted uses listed in the zone district to
which it is added;
4. Such use is compatible with the other listed permitted uses in the zone
district to which it is added;
5. Such use is not specifically listed by name as a prohibited use in the
zone district to which it is added.
Any additions of permitted uses in any zone district must be passed by ordinance
by the City Council.
OPTION 4: AMEND THE CITY STRUCTURE PLAN AND REQUEST TO
ZONE THE PROPERTY NC -NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
The property owner has stated that the NC zone district is better suited for the
property as it allows for various office and commercial uses He could request
that the Council zone the property NC, however, staff does not recommend such
zoning as it is inconsistent with the City Structure Plan, and, thus, would require
an amendment to the City Structure Plan. In the NC zone district, the 3/4 mile
separation requirement between convenience stores is applicable .as well, and,
therefore, even if this property were zoned NC, the proposed convenience store
would not be a permitted use until such time that the existing 7-11 cease opera-
tions.
4
OPTION 1: T-TRANSITION ZONE DISTRICT
The property owner may again request the T-Transition zone district of Council in
December. If the property is zoned T, the only uses that are permitted are those
in existence the effective date of the zoning. In addition, he cannot submit for a
development review until such time that the property is rezoned. A rezoning
must be approved by the City Council prior to the submittal of a project develop-
ment plan.
OPTION 2: MMN-MEDIUM DENSITY MIXED -USE
NEIGHBORHOOD ZONE DISTRICT
The property owner may request the MMN zone district. Staff has consistently
recommended the MMN zone district, consistent with what is indicated on the
City Structure Plan. One of the issues associated with this zone is the 3/a mile
separation requirement for convenience store land uses. The property owner
has stated his intentions to develop a convenience store on the property, how-
ever, under the Land Use Code the separation requirement prohibits such a use
in the MMN zone district. A number of questions related to this issue have
arisen:
1. Can the Planning and Zoning Board modify the separation require-
ment, with conditions?
No, the separation requirement is defined in the list of permitted
uses, and is not a development standard. The Planning and Zon-
ing Board may only grant modifications to development standards.
2. Would staff recommend a modification that would allow the new con-
venience store? How about with the condition that the other existing
convenience store cease operations within five years?
No. The City would have no authority to ensure that the existing 7-
11 ceases operations within the next five (5) years. Furthermore,
staff would not support such a modification request as it is contra-
dictory to the purposes and intent of the Land Use Code.
3. Can staff accept and review an application for this project since the
proposed use is inconsistent with the Land Use Code provisions?
The property owner can submit an application, however, as it would
include uses that are not permitted and are inconsistent with the
Land Use Code, staff would not support the proposal.
4. Can the property owner do a project development plan (PDP) for the
entire site, but have final approval of that portion that has the conven-
ience store conditioned on the existing convenience store ceasing op-
eration?
He can request such a condition from the Planning and Zoning
Board, however, staff would not support such a condition.
3
These options are covered in more detail in the attached pages. If you have any
questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to ask.
Sincerely,
4e'z���r
Leanne A. Harter, AICP
City Planner
xc: Ramsey Myatt, March & Myatt
John F. Fischbach, City Manager
Steve Roy, City Attorney
Paul Eckman, Deputy City Attorney
Greg Byrne, CPES Director
Bob Blanchard, Director of Current Planning
Ken Waido, Chief Planner
Tom Vosburg, Policy Analyst
Kim Kreimeyer, Planning Technician
2
Commu _y Planning and Environmental rvices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
November 6, 1997
Mr. Rex Miller
3833 Spruce Drive
Fort Collins, Colorado 80526
Dear Rex:
Below is a list of several options that could be undertaken regarding the pro-
posed zoning of the property located at the southwest comer of Overland Trail
and Prospect Road. The options listed below assume a desire to develop a con-
venience store with fuel sales on the front portion of the property and some other
use (possibly multi -family) on the rear. The options include the following:
• request to zone the property T-Transition and then rezone to another
district at such time that all proposed uses are permitted in the MMN-
Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood zoning district consistent
with the City Structure Plan;
• request to zone the property MMN-Medium Density Mixed -Use Neigh-
borhood and submit a project development plan at such time that the
proposed convenience store is a permitted use (i.e., the existing 7-11
ceases operations);
• request to add convenience stores without a separation requirement to
the list of permitted uses for the MMN zone district;
• request an amendment to the City Structure Plan and zone the prop-
erty NC -Neighborhood Center zone district, however, the 3/4 mile sepa-
ration requirement is still applicable; and
• request an amendment to the City Structure Plan, zone the property
NC -Neighborhood Center and add convenience stores without a sepa-
ration requirement to the list of permitted uses for the particular zone
district.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020