The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutKING SOOPERS, MILLER BROS. FOOTHILLS SUB. - NON-CONFORMING USE REVIEW - 14-97 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY.r HCS: Unsignalizad intersections release :.id Page Center For Microcomputers in Transportation. University of Florida 512 Well Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Phu (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) lc/ck access (E-W) w elizabeth Major Street. Direction.._. EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 5/2%.•97 Other Information._....... am 1997 short long Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R --- --- -- ---- ---I---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 V 0 Stop/Yield N; NI Volumes 52 662 892 32; PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 ' MC's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ,1.10 ------------------------------ ________________________ Adjustment Factors Southbound L T R ---- ---- -1-- 68 .95 .95 0 i.10 0 _______________ Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver- Gap (tg) Time (If) ----------------------------------'------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road I.50 3.40 HCE.: Unsiqnalized intersections Release 2.id Page Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor- Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 939 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 463 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 463 Prob. of Gueue-Free State: 0.8's ---------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WE. EF� ------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (voh) 9-1' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 589 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 589 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.90 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor- Street NB 56 ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1708 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 109 Major LT. Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.90 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.90 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.90 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 98 intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Vueue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sac/veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ Se, L 18 98 _______ 45.0 _______ _____ 0.7 E --------- 15.8 SB R 79 463 9.4 0.7 B EB L 61 589 6.8 0.3 E 0.5 intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh HCS: Unsiana-1ized In terseciions Release 2.1d Page 1 Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesvilie, FL 32611-2063 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) lc./O: access (E-W) w eli-abeth Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 5/27/97 Other information....... .am pm 1997 short ( iona Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- -- - ---I---- ---- -- - I---- ---- '---- No. Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 ! 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield N; N! volumes 37 6-7 282 29: 23 20 PHF .95 .95 i .95 .95; .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 MC' (%) SU/RV" s (%) Cv's (%) PCE's :1.10 I1.10 1.10 ---------------------------------- ------------------------ HCS--Unsignalized-Intersections---Release_1.id Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------- St:ep 1: RT from Minor Street NE. Conflic Ling Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Mnvement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Oueue-Free State: -------- SteP 2: LT from Major- Street W6 Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: ____________________________________________ Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB ____________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) ------------------------------------- 297 979 979 0.98 EE 328 1196 1196 0.96 Ss 1012 275 0.96 0.96 0.96 265 Adjustmeni Factors intersection Performance Summary Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95% Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach __________________________________________________________________ Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Left Turn Major Road 5-00 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 __.______ ------ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ _____ _________ Throuah Traffic Minor- Road 6.00 3.3U SE, L 26 265 15.1 0-3 C Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 _ 40 9.8 SE. P. �s 979 3.8 0.0 A EE L 42. 1196 3.1 0.0 A 0.2 intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh •M1 HCS: Uns'ionaiized Intersections keleasa 2.Id, F'a qe Center For Microcomputers In Transuortation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville. FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) s92-0378 Streets: (N-S) ks/kfc access (E-W) w elizabeth Major Street: Oirection..". EW Length of Time Analvzed... 60 (min) Ana l vst.................... mid Gate of Analysis.......... 5/27,/9 Other Information......... am pm 1997 short long Twe.-way Stoo-controlled intersection -_______--------------- _____---------- ________-------__ Eastbound 1 Westbound Nor'hbound Southbound I L T R I L T R ! L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 1 1 ; 0 : 1 1 0 > 1 1 Stop/yield N; N Volumes 13 450 95f 258 676 26! 112 4 250 14 1 21 PHF .95 AS .95! _95 .95 .95! .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV' (%) PCE's !1.10 '1.10 ;1.10 1.10 1.10:1.10 1.10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-uo Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 0.00 330 Left Turn Minor- Road 6.50 3"40 Hk,S: Unslnnclized intersections kelease 2-id page 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Sten is RT from Minor Street NE. S2. Conflicting Flows: (voh) 524 712 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 75i 603 Movement: Capacity: (pcph) 751 603 Grob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.62 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB --- ---- --- ------- --------- - Conflicting Flows: (vph) --- - - -----_--- 574 739 Potential Capacity: (pcoh) 913 762 Movement Capacity: ;pcph) 913 762 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.67 0.98 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB - -- --- -- -- -- ----- ---- - - ---- Conflicting Flows: (vph) -- --- - - - -- - - -- 1549 -- ---- -- 1572 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 168 163 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements. 0.66 O.66 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 111 107 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.96 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB S5 ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (voh) 1534 1669 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 737 114 Major LT. Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.65 0.64 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.75 0.72 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.70 0.44 Movement: Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 96 50 intersection Performance Summary Avq_ 95% =low Move Shared Total Queue Approach Kate Cap cap (Delay Length LOS Delov Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ________ (veh) (seciveh) ______ ______ ______ NB L 130 96 > 96 _______ 864.6 _______ 24.4 _____ F --------- NB T 4 111 > 27q,2 NB R 259 751 7.8 --.i B SB L 17 50 > 52 104.8 1.4 F SB T 1 107 > 47.3 SB R 24 603 _ 6.? 0.0 B EB L 15 762 -" 4.6 0.0 A 0.1 WB L 299 q13 ,.9 i.i B 1.6 Intersection Delay =. 54.9 sec/veh .I Lin, ignali -er, I fit er'sec. ti ons Release e. Id h'a ge 1 -=-=-__---__-_---.-. HCz:: Iins Iona Iized Intersections Ral ease :.-id Paae . Center For Microcomputers. In Transportation Lll"IIVer-SitV or Florida 51Z Weil hCll Worksheet for IWSC Intersection Gainesville, FL 3261i-2083 ________________________________________________________ Ph: (904) 392-Oi176 Step 1: RI from Minor Street __________________-____-________-___-___________________ NB SEA __._____.______.__.________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Streets: (N-S) ksikfc access (E-W1 w elizabeth Conflictina Flows: (vph) 654 247 Major Street Direction.... EW Potential CaDAClty: (DCph.1 646 1011E Lenqth of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) _ Movement Capacity: (pcph) 646 1636 Analyst---------- -- --- -- mjd Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.86 1.0 iI [late of Analys. is .27 q7 Other Information......... am pm 1997 short lone '3teo 2: LT from Major Street WE EE. Two-way Stop -controlled intersection --------- ------------------------------------- ______ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 676 248 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Caoacity: (pcph) 817 1306 L T R L T P L T R 1 L T R Movement Capacity: (ocoh) 817 1306 ,____ __-_ ____-___ ____ ____:____ ____ ________ -___ ____ prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.91 1.00 No- Lanes 11 1 < 0 1 1 i 1 0 > 1 1 1 0 > 1 1 -----------------------------------------------""----- StopJYield N; N; Step -1: TH from Minor Street NB 56 Volumes 2 599 43; 66 235 1; 29 1 65; 1 1 1 --------------------- --------------------------------- PHF , .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .95; .p5 .-.- .95: .95 .95 .95 a ConflictinFlows: (vph) 972 q94 Grade 0 G 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) ;.3; 328 MC's (%:i Capacity Adjustment Factor SUJRV's due to Impeding Movements 0.91 0.91 CV's (%) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 305 297 PCE's ;1.10 '1.10 ;1.10 1.10 1.10:1.10 1-10 1.10 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 1.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------ -------- ----------------------------- Steo 4: LT from Minor Street NB 56 ________________________________________________________ Conflictina Flows: (vph) 972 1006 Adjustment Factors Potential Capacity: locc h_1 290 277 Major LT, Minor TH Vehicle Critical Follow-up impedance Factor: 0.90 0.90 Maneuver Gap (to) Time (tf) Adjusted Imnedance Factor-: 0.9s 0.S, ________________________________________________________ Capacity Adjustment Factor Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 due to impeding Movements V.92 V.82 F:ieht turn Minos- Road 5.50 2.60 Movement Capacity: 1pcon) 268 227 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 ---------------------------- -------------------- Left Turn Minor- Road 6.50 3.40 _ntersa.-t,on Performance Summary Ava 95< Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach hate :,s_ :a Del Delay, Movement chi i. cph ...=chi(seciveh; (veh) (s -J -eh) ________ _____ ------ ------ -------- NE L 4 _ _ _ 5.4 --------- ----- --------- N P_. F.' 75 646 S.G 0-4 8 - 56 _ i 227 > ..,, 14.1 0.0 C SB 1" 1 297 > 10.6 - S6 R 1 1038 3.5 0.0 A- EE 2 1306 Z_8 0.0 A 0.0 WE L 7o al: 4,y G.:. n ,.1 Intersection Deiay = 1.2 sec/veh APPENDIX D ' ; - - i ce tionz R.' -.- -- —Id F'nue HCc: Lin-,ia �ilized rn .er__c. ., cgs Center- For M i crocompu r:ers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall ainesville. FL 32611-2033 Ph- (904) 392-0'78 _ -- - Sit er ts: (N-S) Ic/cl.: access. (E-Wr w elizabeth Major Street Direction.... EW Lenath of Time Analv_ed... Gil (mini Anal_ vst........"........". mid Date of Ana)ysis.......... 5/['/C�' Other information......"..am om 1997 short long Two-way Stop Intersection _-----------------------------—_-___-_--__-_--__-__---__—___- —_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes ! 1 1 0 ! 0 1 1 ; 0 0 o ! i 0 Stop/Yield N; N! Volumes 52 615 823 32! 15 68 PHF .93 .93 .9`. .993 .933 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) I SU /RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's !1.10 !i.10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ HCS__ Uns i ana l i zed_1 nter-ectionsRelease_ 2.Id___________________ F'.aae__ Work sheet for TWF.0 intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: PT front Minor- Street Ne. SR Conflici_ino Flows: (vph) 885 Potential CaP&Clty: (pCphl 493 Movement: Capacity: (pcph) 493 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.64 -_.______________________________________ Step 2: Ll from Major Street _____________ __ Wb EE ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (voh) 919 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 625 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 625 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.90 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB ______________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) ___ 1619 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 122 Major LT, Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.90 Adjusted Impedance Factor-: 0.90 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.90 Movement Capacity: ________________________________________________________ (pcph) 110 Adjustment Factors intersection Fer'ormance Summary Vehicle critical Fol)ow-uo Avg. 95% Maneuver Gap ;tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Oueue Approach __________________________________________________________________ Rat- Cac Cap Delay Length LOS Delav Left Turn Major Road = '.lo Movement (ecph) (pcph) (pcph),Lsec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) Right Turn Minor . Road 5. 5i: 2.60 ________. ______ ______ _____________ _______ _____ _________ ,hrouah Traffic Minor Road 6.00 SE'. L 18 110 39.1 0.6 E Left iurn Minor Road e"50 t.4il 14"2 SE r: 80 45' E.1 U.6 8 EB L 62 625 6.4 0.3 'c. 0.5 Intersection Gelav = G.9 sec/veh HCS. Uns igne iized Inter sent ions Release :.id raae Center For Microcornput.ers In Transportation University or Florida 512 Weil Fall Gainesville, FL 326li-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (W-S) lc/ck access (E-W) w li-abeth Major Street Direction.... EW Length of mime Analyzed.. - 60 (min) An a l vs t................... a1jd Date of Anclvsis........ 5/27/97 Other Information ......... a rn Pm 1997 short long Two-way Stoo-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound I 'Nor+hbound I Southbound . L T R . L T R , L T R , L T R No. Lanes 1 1 0 ; 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 stop/Yield I NI N; Volumes 37 554 262 291 23 20 PHF .93 .93 .93 .901 .93 .93 Grade 0 0 0 MC'. (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's II. 10 ;1-10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ HCS: Unsiannlized intersections Release 2.Id Paoe 2 ------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ________________________________________________________ step 1- RT from Minor Street NB SCf Conf'rictino Flows: (vph) "'82 Potential Cauac ity: tocpn) 996 Movement Capacity: (PCPh) =96 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.98 ____________________ titep <: LT from major- ------------------------------------------ ____________________ Street W:' tFi Conflict -Inc; Flows: (vph) `I1° Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1216 Movement Capacity: (PCph) _ 1216 Prob. of i)i.ieue-Free State: 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NE Ss ---------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 9'14 totential Capacity: (pcph) loc$ Major LT, Minor Tr Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor - due tc impedina Movemen r- 0.96 Movement Capacity: ___________________________________._____________________ (pcph; __- Adjustment Factors lnterseCtion Performance Summary Vehicle Critical Follow-uo Avc. 95° Maneuver Gap (to) Time (tf) 'Tow Mo':e .-...-cJ i " EIal '__%L a u e -.-:roach __________________________________________________________________ -t- o na C'� ,[ t/c la `i a' __ I d'✓ �•t __. Turn Major Road 5.00 .10 .,,�.., ,o'en'ent (pcph) (r r r n) i,cccn)(sec/veh) � eh; Rignt Turn Minor Road 6. Sit 2. 6i- ________ ______ ______ ______ _c_____ _______ _____ __-_____- Thr-ouah Traffic Minor Road 6-00 3.50 S=• _ 28 _:- 13.j 0-- Left turn Minor Road 6-50 3.4Q 24 Qzz 44 12i6 a.1 0.0 A 0.'2 interse-ti,n Vela. _ H.CS: Un_icnal!zed iiite sections keleo>r ..Id page Center F orIhi r.-ocomputers in lransp n;-tation Dim ver-r�tvoflo'lda S I � Weil Hall bninesville. FL 26ii-206i: Ph: U-e�t5: {N-Jj 1,5i1;'•: 6•_�._-_ (L-W) W elizabeth Major S.raet Direction---- LW Lerr:,th Time Ancl.. _v2ed. 60 :'min; Arlalys t............... ... mid Date of A.na"Ivsi_.......... Sj Other info, -mat ion......... am iS97 sh or `. ionc IWn-Wdl' jtop-controiled intersection ___-____ __ E--tbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L R L T R L i' R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 1 0 ? 1 I 0 ? 1 ]too/Yield N! NJ ' Volumes 13 403 951 256 607 26; 1 i 2 4 250; 14 1 21 PHF .S3 .9c. .9i:' .9 _93 .93: .99 .93; .E., .93 .93. Graf= 0 0 0 0 MC. S(I;R\"s CV' A) PCE s ;1.10 '1.10 ;1.10 '1.10 1.10;1.10 1.10 1. 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors \'eh icic Cr itiCal FC�)low-Up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tfj __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn MalOr' koad 5.0;: 1.10 Rich'L Turn Minor koaG -.`_. .60 Tnrouoh Traffic Minor Road S.VU _eft Turn Minor kvad 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsionalized Intersect: ion. k.-'I case E.ld Pac_ worksheet for TWSC intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step kT from Minor _street NE. SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 43 65J Potential Capa,ciiy: (ocph)1 646 Movement Capacity: (pcph) '37 646 Prow. of Queue-� ec JLotc. V.be U. S'0 ----- ._---------------- ___------------------- Step 2: LT from major Street ______________ W` EB ________________._______________-___.______________-______ Conflicting Flows: (vph') S35 6'c1 Potential .:apacitY: (pcph) S53 312 Movement Capacity: (pcph) S'S-_ Siz pros. of Queue --Free State: 0.6E 0.9E -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TM from Minor- Street NE 56 ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1456 1479 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 188 113 lapocity Adjustment Factor due to Imped'i ny Movements 0.67 0.6' Movement Capacity: (pcph) 125 122 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.97 0.99 --------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street iiF• SB .. ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1440 1578 - Potential Capacity: (pcph) i55 129 Major LT, Minor Tr1 impedance rac-tor: 0.66 0.65 Adjuster impedance Fortis: 0-72 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Imped'inc, Movements ..7i 0.45 Movement Capacit•r. (pcph) ________________________________________________________ ii0 56 intersectionn Performance Summary A JG. 95' Flow Move jhar eG TC tal !;Ueue Approach F, a to Cap Cap fcI' _encth LOo Dela'J Movement (pcph) (ec.phl (ocDn)(sEC%veil) lveh) (sec/veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ NE, L 132 -i i0 i10 _______ 56`--'_1 _______ _____ --------- N.. 7 i25 ? 191.; NB R 296 787 5B L 17 58 60 ES.� i._ F SE. T 1 122 ? 33.9 SF. k 25 646 5.8 0.0 6 Eft L 15 8i2 4.5 6.0 A 0.1 WB L 305 95;. 5. 6 i . 6 E• .i .6 intersection Delay = 40_5 seC/veh HC Un=i a I -I al iZed 1 ntersac t'i t- ns Releas= _.id Paa= Center For Mi�rcc omGuter s. in. iransp or ration University of Florida 512 Weil hall Gainesville. FL. 3261i-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0978 {l e______ Streets: (N-b:) ks lk: fc ar c e-> =. E-ww iizabeth Major Street Direction---- CW L en ath of Tim- Ana lye ed _._ 60 (min! Anal vst.............. m.jd. Gate of An a lys i s . . . . . . . . . 51127/97 Other Inferrnation...... .-.am om 1097 short long Two-way Stop -controlled intersection _--__-_-__- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R 1 L T R L i H i L T R No. Lanes 1 1 . 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 -i Stop/Yield N; N; Volumes 526 4=; 66 215 1: 29 1 651 1 1 1 PHF .9 .93 .9,; .93 .93 .93; .93 .9 .93: .95 Grade 0 0 00 MC' (%) SU/RV's (%)1 CV's (%) PCE's 11.10 1.10 11-10 1.10 1.10;1.10 1.10 7.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Maneuver ------------------------------ Left Burn Major Roa; High: Turn Minor Road lhrouch Traffic Minor Road Left lur n Mincr RJa- Cri_icai Foilow-u. Gap (to) ---------------------------- Time (tf) 60 O0 .50 HUS: unslonalized Inters-cti on=: rielcase Id Pape 2 Worksheet for TWSC intersection ----------------------------------------------- Step 1: r;T from Minor Street NB SB Conilictina Flows: Ivph) i09 %31 Potent'ia"i I.aGarltV: IU;-Gin1 896 1058 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 606 1058 j'rob. of Oueue-Free State: U.89 1.00 ________________________________________________________ Stec 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflictina Flows: rvph) 612 232 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 676 1329 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 676 1529 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: U- 91 1-00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SE, --------------------------------------------- Conflict:ing Flows: rvph) 594 916 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 370 361 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movement_. 0.9i Movement. Capacity: (pcph) 337 Prob. of Queue -Free State: i.00 ------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NE. ___________________________________________ Confli:tina Flows: ,'vain) 594 Potential Capacity: (pcoh) 921 Major LT, Mir•._- IH. Impedance Factor: 0.91 Adjusted impedance Factor: G.95 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.93 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ------------------------------------------- 296 intersection Performance Summary Ava. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Kate Cap Cap Delay Length LCU_ Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(s-c;vea) (yen) .�e: r�ehi ________ ______ ______ _____________ _______ _____ _________ tJ E:• L 34 298 299 i .6 0.4 C NB T 1 8. NB R 77 696 5.:. 0.4 E SB L 1 254 > 286 12., SE. 1 1 325 > SE, k 1 1058 11.4 EE L - 1c29 ...� W5 L 75 676 4.j Intersection Delay = 0.0 C 9.6 D.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 0.2- A i.l 1.2 seciveh APPENDIX C HC_: lnsinnalized Intersections Release '.1d Pacle Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weii Hall Gaine=vrille, FL 26i)-2052 Ph: (904)9(-0:E''6 Streets: (N- ) lc;'c 4: access (E-W) w eli-ab,th Major Sitreet: O'irection.... EW Length of Time Analyzed.-.. 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Data of Analysis.......... 5/2-1/9i Other information .... ,.... am Cpm 199r short iono iwn-way SLop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound `Jouth(oound L T R L T R L T fi L T R No. Lanes 1 1 C 0 1 1 O 0 0 I 0 1 Stop/Yield NNi VC) 1umes 52 48-- SBA _ 15 63 PHF .9 - .9 Grade G 0 O MC' s (A) SU/RV's ('L) CV' (`°) PCEcs. 1.10 ii. 10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ HC'C,: Uns.ianalized intersections Release 1-id Faoe 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ________________________________________________________ :tep 1: 1<T from Minor Street NB SB LonflictinG Flows: (vph) 645 Potential Capacity: (pc:ph) 650 Movement Capacitv: (pcph) 650 Prob. of Oueue-Free Sta+e: 0.97 ________________________________________________________ Stay 2: LT from Major Street EB Conflicting Flows -- (vph) _ ___WB -- _ -_ 664 Potential Capacitv: (pcph) 509 Movement Capacity: (ocph) 609 Prob. of Queue -Free �.tate: 0.92 ________________________________________________________ Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB ____________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) _____ 1261 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 197 Major- LT, Minor- TH impedance Factor: 0.92 Adjusted Imoedance Factor: 0.92 Capacitv Adjustment Factor due to Impedlnc Movements 0.92 Movement Capacity: ________________________________________________________ (pcph) 131 Adjustment Factors lntersection 'Performance Summary Veh4z-;e cr4t: iCo1 Fn1104-up Avg- �5^ 1N1&n as ver Gap (tg) -lime " ) _ r 10, Move Sna.-ed Total Ouellg Approach _________________________________________________________________ Haig Ca= cap Da 1aY LenGT_h LOS 0el ay Left Turn Major Road 5_00 22_10 Movement (pcph) (zcpn) 1p^-ph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) R inhi iurr� Min,-;- Road 5.50 2.60 ________ ______ T nrouph Traffic Minor Roac 6.00 6.3r St. L i= i'.1 _�.[ 0.+ 0 Lett iur-, M,.,,,- ...,a_ 6.50 ... 40 9.2 SF. ', 64 �50 6.4 0.5 Ec• L 64 5:.- 4,3 0. ,. 0.5 'ter z e- 'o Oglav = Ii._ se: %veh H C S— Unsignal iced Int-r-sections Relc--ase _.)d Page Center Fa' M i;r, worwou tar s in Trdnsoor tat i of [in iver-s itv of F'I or i d a 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2053 -------------- ====-=--- —=c___---_-_________— _ Jtr-aet (hl-S) Ic/ci. a',rr_: ( W1 w eli ZaD&d hajor Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analvzed... 00 (min) Analyst ................... mad Date of Analysis......... 5/27/97 tither inf ormaf:ion._.......am Pm 1997 shor 1. long Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection —_------_-v--____. ____—_____--_--_-_-_______________. _____ Eastbound Westbound Northbound y'ou u thbond i L T R ; L T R L T R L T R --- ---- --- -- ---- --- --- ---- ---- No. Lanes T 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 i 0 1 Stop/Yield N; NI Volumes 37 365 192 29; 23 20 PHY .9 .y ,9 ,4! S' .9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (A) SU/RV's (A) CV'- s PCE's. ;1. iC 1----------------------------------------------------------------------- . 1C I. iO R C:= (h,s�gnai iced inter ,ec tion, Release 2.Id ------------ Worksheet for TWi,C, Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- -5i-ep is PT i--om Minor NB SE „ nf1iciIng Flows: (vphi 2I Potential C,,od_i tv: (DcUh1 1050 M-vament. Capaci*y: (ccph) 1060 Y r'Jb. of Qucue-Free State: 0.96 -- ---- -- ------ --- - Step 2: LT f-;-om Major --------- -------------------. Street W5 Et• ________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------I Confiictlnc, Flows: (vph) ____ _-__I 24` Potential Capacity: (pcPh) 1310 Mov-m-nt Capacity: (pcPh) 1310 Pr-Ob. of irueue-Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT mom Minor Street NB SB --------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 695 Pot_eofial capaoity: (Pcph) 417 Majo;- LT, Minor TH. impedance Fa, -tor- G.97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 Capacity Adjustment Fa.t-.- due to Impedi n Mcverr.ent_ 0.9i Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------- tPcph) 403 Adjustment Factors .ntersection Performance Summary Vehicle Critic-' Follow-up Maneuver lap (ta) Time (tf) .low Mov- shared Total i4leue Approach __________________________________________________________________ Hots i.aP C. a C. Dei a Length LGS Delay Left Turn Major Road p .F_ .� i0 Movement (ocph) (pc ph} (ecoh)(sec /veh) (vehj (sec/veh) Right Turn Minor Road p _ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ _________ Through Ti-affic Minor Road E•. UV L __ 40j 0.1 b Left iur-n Minor- Road _ 6.7 SE. F 24 1066 .4 0.0 A E5 L ._1 131C' ..5 0.0 A 0.2 Intersection D-iaY = 0.6 sac/veh F'agc HCS 1ln_:ianaiized In+ersections uelease 2.id Pace Center For Mi cr'ocomou tern in Tr a nsoortat ion University of Florida )12 Weil Hail ua-inesvi'Ile. FL 32611-_0"0 Ph: l9041 392-i376 Street : (n;_Sl V_ikfc ac,ez3 (E-W) w :'I?zabeth Ma tor- acr-eei. Direcij,,n.... EW I-ength of -ime Analyzed... 60 (min" Analvst................... mid Oaf- o; Ana-lysis...-...... 5/227!97 Other information .........am 0, 1997 short ionq iwo-wav Stop -controlled intersection _________________________________________________________ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T p -__ ____ ____ ___ ____ ____ _ ---- No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 i 1 1 0 > 1 1 Stop/Yield N; Ni Volumes 15 `_102 82! 224 40-1 76; 9a 4 219; 14 i 2i pHF .9 .9 .9I .9 .9 .y .9' .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 Su/RV's (%) (-.V's !%) PCE's iI i0 Ii. 10 :1.10 1.10 i. 10;1.10 1.10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ nd iustment Factors Vehic le Cr t1C.ai . ,:,ll Maneuver Gac T ir(,e left urn Major 2aacl 00 2.i0 Rioht Turn Minor koad Throuch TrHff!-- Minor- goad 6.UU Lest iurr? Minn, koac --- r-in:aicna l?sed intersect?ene: �elea _-- _.id Worksheet for TW5C intersection -------------------------------------------------------- S tec is RT from Minor Sireet NF: St Con i:tino riuws: rvpn) J_ 440 Fete t ),-I Copari c lDc Dil l bi•' 66J Mnvern ent Capacity: (p tph)- r'ra;. of QUeUe-. ree State: 0.70 0 7 -------------------------------------------------------- S L 2: Li from Ma'or Street W6 EE. -------------------------------------------------------- Confliciinc Flows: (voh) 42c 47) Potential Capacity: (ocoh) i0i2 1018 Movement Capacity: (Pcph) i072 1018 Prob. of Vueue-Free State: 0.74 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step n. TH from Minor Street NE S6 ________________________________________________________ Confl ictiny Plows: i'YDhI 1120 11 potential CaDacity: (pooh) 252 6 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impedino Movements C..7 0.7 Movement Capacity: Ipcoh) 20 Prob. cf pue.ue-Free State: E'.: LOE' ________________________________________________________ Step ». LT from Minor SL -eet �'E• ________________________________________________________ Conflictinq `lows: (von) 1104 izec "Potential Capacity: (pcohl 4 206 Major" LT. Minor Tr: Imoedarce Fa cor: N!i juste� imDarcn_e rac-,or: _ t_` Capacity A^�justment Factor due to impedinc Movements 0.%7 0. )� Movement Capacity: locphl 186 111. -------------------------------------------------------- intersection rerforma.,ce Summary }vq. iv F iow Move Shared Total Crueue-Doroach i'atc Cap Cap Velay r_c.•p'h Lt'°• l/e-lav Movement ro'Onl 4PCOh_I (Dcph.1(1�civehi (veni I r%veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ _____ _________ NE L i 2 1 186 > 187 55-5 5.1 F NE, T 4 207 > 21.6 Nn k 267 887 J.b 56 L 18 113 > 116 37.1 0.6 E SR T 1 202 _ 18.1 5E is 25 825 4. EF, L 15 i016 3.6 0.0 A 0.1 Wn L 274 10724.b 1_ -A 1.6 intersection belay = 6.2 seciveh rac- IC:._ 'Insion.sl -ems ,ntersections release ;c. race Center For Mi•-r-ccomouters In Transoortation (University of 'Iorioa 512 Weir Hal 6o'ineSvillE. FL +%61}-2G55 Ph: (`+G4) ---------- ______------- ____ _________________ E tree Ls (N-Si S/kt: aCCess (E-W) ., ellzaoeth ma for feet Direc"on.... EW Len:;th of Time Anal_yzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Dat= of Analysis. ......... `i[7iv7 0iiher information. pm 1997 'short long Two-wa( "tor, vntrellaG inomerse-tior, ______ _ Eastbound W-_tbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 tcaiYield N; N; i Volumes - -60 36: 59 152 11 28 i 62: l 1 1 PHF .9 S .9I .9 .9 .9! ._ .S .9! .9 _9 .9 Grace 0 0 0 0 MC's (4) SU/RV's (A) CV'_ (A) PCE 's Ii.iO !1.i0 !1.10 i_10 1.10;1.10 1.10 1.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- djustment Faitcrs vent: le Maneuver ____________________________ cf'_ TLu'r, Me for Rpar1 Rl(;nt Turn Minor Road Thr-oua'n Traffic Minor Road Let T_ turn Minor Koa: Critical Follow-up liao (tg) Time !tf) ____________________________ 5.00 10 5.50 2.60 6.00 .30 6.50 40 HCS: Unsionalized Intersections Release 2.Id Page __________._______-______________._________ Worksheet for TWSC intersection ________________________________________________ St:ea I: RT from Minor Street NE• 3E Conflictinc Flows: (vph) 21 109 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 647 11J7 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 64 1"137 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.91 1.00 Step<LT from MajorStreet -" -- -------------WE Conflicting Flows: (•:phi --------__-- 442 ?7O Potential Capacity: (pcph) i056 i42: Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1056 142: Prob. of uueue-Free State: 0.93 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor- Street --- NP. SE ----_--------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vpn) -- 659 -- 679 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 492 48C Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.93 i�,•' Movement Capacity: (peon) 457 ;,rob. of Vueue-Free State: .00 __________________________ _____________�_UV Step 4: L T from Minor- Street _________-_V_ NE SE. ----------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph-! 660 694 Potential Capacity: (pcp.n. 439 420 Majr- _, Mina- Tin impedance Factor: 0.9: :.'3 Adjustec impedance =---�cr: 0.94 0,94 Capacity Ad ILIStment vazcr aue tv imoedinu Movement= 0.94 0.86 Movement Capacity: (peon"1 ________________________________________________________ 4'l4 Jpl intersection Performance Summary Avp. 5J" =1v.< Movezt,narEd Total VuEuc AGprpoCh Rate Cat Cap Delay Leng to L0.. Da lay Movement ________ (pcph} ______ (pcpn) ______ (ccoh)(sec/veh) ______ _______ (veh) _______ r,sec iyen ) NE'. L 34 4 i 4 415 _____ _________ NR 1 457 6.2 NP. R 76 847 4.7 0.2 A. SE, i_ 1 361 3a9 =. i 0.0 6 jE. 1 i 44C. 7. i _ _SE, R 1 1137 EE 1. _ 14 23 _ 0.0 A0.0 WE. L �. 1056 .7 0.1 A ?.n intersection Delay = 1.1 seriveh APPENDIX B 133 51 I CEDA2uwo�\ . __.._------ ...�--- III 4-o 2?gI I K) I MATTHEW J. DELICH , P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Observer 0� INTERSECTION OF TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date 5 o q7 0ay—r4V PSbA V Clty F6 e T COL L ? 5 R - Rignt turn _S stmigm �--� J �` � � AND I L -Lett turn TIME II BEGINS II R >C tmm NORTH I S I L I Total from SOUTH II R I S I L I Total 11 N°rt'h sotJth tram WEST I TEm II R I S I L I Totes II west TOTAL ALL tmm EAST I R I S I L I Total 7130llo1 0101 0. 11231019132i1 3Z1101 711515Z111oIio311111411 1G(o11-1? 74cil"101 1 ^ 1114101?,12211 Z.Z11o1?41Zo14411/01921o1/0?111':rZ11174- Jr> II O i I I <= Ilt�� I o 14 I Z 211 ZZ 11 1 1451101 5-6 1110 1 '�51 0 1 4�' 11 15 ( 11 / 73 IRr. 11-.-)I I I ,L, II it (,;)17I 4- 11 1¢II014(a11416011SI74.1/ I 31114311167 it I I 17 II 1 1 I II II 1 1 I II i I I II II 173�)-`riwi 11 �7 1^ 1 I o 11 Z I o 17,21 9 O 11 q0 11 1 1152 16 121 211: ? 13&o 1 2 14 o 011(o I Z117 O Z II I I I II I I I II II I I I II I I I II II II I I I It ( I I it II I I I II I I I II II II I I I II I I I 11 II I I I II I I I II II II I I I II I I I II II I I I II I I 1 II. II II I I I II I I I II it I I I II I I I II II II I I I II I I I it II I I I II I I I II II II I I I II I I I II II I I I II I I I II II 42all6-I c, 1 4 I 13 11551 Z 161 SZ 11 9 1 II 3 1 g '13 8 IIZ (o11191 & 1 ZI 869 II Z!Z ll303 44s 11 & I o, I 1 1 7 11471 O 17,51 73 11 'S0 II G 1 r001(o31 1IIZ► 1 77 1 5110 3 11 O 7Z 11 3s0 soo 113 1 ") I G I 9 115-71 1 1151 73 11 ?Z II 71 9311o111& II?_1I 701 1 1 9Z IIZs311 35 15 II 7 1 0 13 1 /6 1157I 1 134-1 �4- 11 1oQ. 111b11231(DZ1 i 9!5'IIZZI Sol sll/ 7 1131 Z 1141(0 II I I I II I I I II II I I I I i I I II Ii 4o_5 •ll61 1 0 1141 35 112171 4 197132Z1135-7 12-,11o11ZZ¢I(051117 1,20z11513T� 11/04911/4-0<o MATi'HEW J. DELICH , P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS /.- n OGaerver J 4 C% Date 5/6Day -4f 0 P = f.-F1 Ofty !- O lr -- �% £- V I AJ S R = AipM turn S = Stmigm INTERSECTION OF L l r'rLtF �.'ASRjE', k J AND b) �L r r� %` L = Lett turn TIME BEGINS TOTAL NORTH tmm SOTH Nomn II R I S I L I Total II R I S I L I Totai i1 Soutn ' FAST I fom I I R I S I L I A °mil II fmm II TOTAL =satfrom R I S I L I Total II I"'�ALL TOTAL A 1 5 1 13 11 I I I li II I 1 I II I 1141 If li. 714 ob I I I 11 Il�dl t i II I itZ1 li II o0111 IZI 7 II 1 1 1 it II Z1 1 1 II 1 1 I 11 II 1c61 511 5 1 I 1 1 3 11 1 i 1 II II ca I I I it I 131 II II II I I I ►I I I � it II I I I II I f I II II 73o-R7,rjI71 IZ31 4' 11 1 1 1 II 1 I 71 II II II I f I II I I I II fl I I I II I I I II II II I I I II I I i it II I t i II I I I II II II I ( I II I I I II II I I I it I I I II II II I I I II I I I II Il I I I II I I I II II II I I I II I I I II II I I I II I I I II II II I I I II I I I II it I I I II I I I Ii I II I I I II I i I p II I I I II I I I II II 3 010 7 I IZI t 9 II I I I II II 41 1 1 11 1 1 ct 1 11 II 445111'a 1 1 s 1 z 311 1 t I p II 101 1 1 11 1 1121 II II 60011 !?1 1 3 1 2011 1 1 I II 71 1 1 11 1 1 9 1 II 11 515w 161 I SI 21 II I I I II il�ol I I II I Il l II II II I I I II I I I �I II I I I II I I I II II if,�-I 6 3II 1 I I II II3ZI I I II 1 164 II II 11 APPENDIX A 0 D CD /Ii 1 m 1 /26 0rn /258 66N 0 r- /258 W. ELIZABETH 2/13 --/ f 37/52 - � 599/450 N 0 627/662 43/95 CLo N W Cedarwood Plaza �- 29/32 �— 7R7 /R AM / PM LONG RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 Table 3 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Intersection W. Elizabeth/Cedarwood/KFC (stop sign) NB LT/T NB RT SB LT/T SB RT EB LT WB LT W. Elizabeth/Little Caesars (stop sign) SB LT SB RT EB LT Level of Service AM PM C F B B C F A B A A A B C A A Table 4 Long Range Peak Hour Operation E B B Level of Service Intersection AM PM W. Elizabeth/Cedarwood/KFC (stop sign) NB LT/T C F NB RT B B SB LT/T C F SB RT A B EB LT A A WB LT A B W. Elizabeth/Little Caesars (stop sign) SB LT C E SB RT A B EB LT A B CD ll 0 0 0 /j 1 m "k-1/26 215/607 N /-- 66/258 IN W. ELIZABETH 2/13 --)0( ) } r 37/52 - 526/403 N \�0 554/615 i 43/95 --� m � N � Cedarwood Plaza AM/PM N SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 N Table 1 1997 Peak Hour Operation Intersection W. Elizabeth/Cedarwood/KFC (stop sign) NB LT/T NB RT SB LT/T SB RT EB LT WB LT W. Elizabeth/Little Caesars (stop sign) SB LT SB RT EB LT Table 2 Trip Generation Level of Service AM PM B F A B B E A A A A A A B D A B A A Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out 1. Existing Retail 230 3 2 11 11 5.654 KSF 2. King Soopers Expansion 1360 15 6 57 55 10.819 KSF 3. Net Increase in Trips 1130 12 4 46 44 f' q N m cli 1 /26 0 0 0 --w - 152/401 /— 59/224 2/13 360/302 —� 38/83 --,. o ca N N (.D Cedarwood Plaza m 00Lo to or) N IN W. ELIZABETH oj 37/52 385/483 29/32 -192/51 AM / PM 1997 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 1 necessary left -turn storage cannot be attained for afternoon peak hour traffic volumes. These volumes probably extend to other hours of the day beyond just the afternoon peak hour. Since over 200 feet of westbound left -turn storage is required approaching intersection A, side -by -side left -turn lanes could not be accomplished between intersections A and B. Therefore, it is recommended that the City consider limiting intersection B to right-in/right-out only. In order to effectively make this work, all the properties on the north side of West Elizabeth Street should be interconnected. At the present time, there are barriers to this interconnection. The City may also want to consider placement of a median on West Elizabeth Street that will positively limit the turns at intersection B. There appears to be adequate width to accomplish this. This recommendation regarding the geometry on West Elizabeth Street and the turn limitations is not related to the proposed King Soopers Store expansion. Approval of the expansion should not be financially tied to the suggested improvements on West Elizabeth Street. They are offered as a solution to an existing concern that will be exacerbated by future development on the north side of West Elizabeth Street. The Cedarwood Plaza Shopping Center and the King Soopers Store, in particular, are adequately served by pedestrian, bicycle, and transit transportation modes. Expansion of the King Soopers Store will not significantly change the operation at the West Elizabeth Access to Cedarwood Plaza. horizontal curves on West Elizabeth Street, west of Taft Hill Road. West Elizabeth Street varies in width in this area from 60 to 65 feet. There are bike lanes on West Elizabeth Street. These bike lanes vary in width from 3 feet to 5 feet. There are sidewalks on both sides of West Elizabeth Street. There are no gaps in the sidewalks adjacent to Cedarwood Plaza. Transfort serves Cedarwood Plaza with Routes 2 and 3. Route 2 travels eastbound on West Elizabeth Street at 30 minute headways. Route 3 travels westbound on West Elizabeth Street at 30 minute service. There are stops on both routes that are convenient for Cedarwood Plaza. Table 2 shows the trip generation expected from the expansion of the King Soopers store. This information was calculated using factors contained in Trip Generation, 5th _Edition, ITE. Line 1 shows the trip generation for the existing retail store that will be incorporated into the expansion. Line 2 shows the trip generation for the total expansion area. Line 3 shows the net increase in trip generation due to the expansion. The newly generated trips were assigned to the access to West Elizabeth Street. Due to the location of the King Soopers Store within Cedarwood Plaza, it is expected that most of these patrons would use this access. Based upon casual observation, this access is the primary access to Cedarwood Plaza. Background traffic was obtained from the "Jefferson Commons Student Apartments Site Access Study," July 1995. This study also contained traffic forecasts for other future developments between Taft Hill Road and Overland Trail that would likely contribute traffic to West Elizabeth Street. Figure 2 shows the short range traffic at the key intersections. operation at the key intersections. in Appendix C. Operation will conditions. During the afternoon turns/throughs will be delayed. Figure 3 shows the long range traffic at the key intersections. operation at the key intersections. in Appendix D. Operation will conditions. During the afternoon turns/throughs will be delayed. (year 2000+) future peak hour Table 3 shows the peak hour Calculation forms are provided be similar to the existing peak hour, minor street left (year 2015) future peak hour Table 4 shows the peak hour Calculation forms are provided be similar to the existing peak hour, minor street left Operation at the key intersections will be similar to most stop Sign controlled intersections along arterial streets in Fort Collins. The West Elizabeth/Cedarwood/KFC intersection may approach meeting signal warrants. However, due to its proximity to Taft Hill Road, it is not a good candidate for signalization. Signals are not recommended at this location. Of larger concern to the City is the geometry on West Elizabeth Street. As stated earlier in this memorandum, the co M u� o v CO CO • o LO O 6 o cD a cn O p O r • X Q o u z J w O J • �p w > N O z T w p a z w w z 'Jn V N n N N W a: Z z w W z U Z J w W o 0 0 a CL a cc W a3 U LL a cc Q ~ TO: 0. C. Larson, Michael Bray, City of Fort FROM: Matt Delich DATE: May 29, 1997 MEMORANDUM King coopers Architect Collins SUBJECT: Expansion of the King Soopers Store in Cedarwood Plaza traffic study (File: 9730MEM1) King Soopers is proposing an expansion of their store in the Cedarwood Plaza Shopping Center in Fort Collins. The total expansion will be 10,819 square feet. A portion (5,654 square feet) will come from an existing store to the south. The remaining area (5,165 square feet) will be new building area to the south of the existing store. The scope of this traffic study was discussed with City staff. Peak hour traffic counts and field investigations were conducted in early May 1997. The peak hour traffic counts along West Elizabeth Street are provided in Figure 1. Raw traffic count data is provided in Appendix A. Appendix A also contains dimensioned sketches of the geometry along West Elizabeth Street, west of Taft Hill Road. The two key intersections are labelled A and B for easy reference in this report. City staff concerns were largely centered on the geometry in this segment. Table 1 shows the operation at the two key intersections along West Elizabeth Street. Operation is generally acceptable. Minor street left-turns/throughs operate at levels of service E and F during the afternoon peak hour. This is primarily a function of the traffic on West Elizabeth Street itself, rather than related to the actual turning movements. Calculation forms for these analyses are contained in Appendix B. The area of primary concern is between intersections A and B. The distance between these intersections is 170 feet on centers. in this area, two end -to -end left -turn lanes are provided on West Elizabeth Street. The westbound left -turn lane approaching intersection A is 56 feet long. The eastbound left -turn lane approaching intersection B is 60 feet long. Using the conventional "rule of thumb" of one foot storage per left -turning vehicle during the critical peak hour (afternoon) results in the following desired storage requirement: Westbound - 225 feet Eastbound - 55 feet Clearly, this could not be accomplished with end -to -end left - turn lanes. The geometry is further complicated by the