HomeMy WebLinkAboutBROOKFIELD SECOND FILING, TRACTS D & E - PDP/FDP - FDP150025 - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPlanning & Zoning Board
February 11, 2016
Page 6
Project: Brookfield Second Filing
Project Description: This is a request for a Project Development Plan for Brookfield Second Filing
Tracts D and E, located at the northeast corner of Precision Dr. and Brookfield Dr. The proposal calls for
changes to 2 building types from a previously approved, but expired, plan. The stacked ranch condos
originally approved are now proposed as townhome-style condos. There are 12 buildings proposed with
a total of 68 units; the overall density of the site is 11.1 dwelling units per acre. The parcels are located in
the Harmony Corridor (HC) zone district
Recommendation: Approval
Staff and Applicant Presentations
Jason Sherrill, with Landmark Homes, gave an overview of the project, focusing on the important
features of the project, which is actually the final phase of a larger project that was previously approved
in 2002. Plans had to be resubmitted because the vested rights had expired and had to conform to the
new engineering standards. The buildings are now townhome-style condos, which is more appealing to
the current market, the units are larger but fewer overall. They will have private outdoor areas and 2-car
garages. He reviewed the few changes to the plan, illustrating the changes relative to the original plan
and their conformance with the new standards.
Staff Analysis
Planner Everette provided an analysis of the project, showing the location on a map and reviewing the
zoning compliance of this project, she stated that secondary uses had been previously identified on the
Harmony Park ODP. The project meets the development and dimensional standards established within
the LUC. Regarding open space requirements, Planner Everette stated that the necessary compliance
has been satisfied. She indicated that pocket parks are close by as well, and she showed a map of the
proximity of the project to other areas. Staff finds the project to be similar to the rest of the subdivision
and in compliance with the LUC.
Public Input
John Zac, 5038A Brookfield Drive, is the Chairman of the Townhome Homeowner's Association, and he
stated his issues with this plan: 1.) he understood that the pool was going to be twice as large as the
current one proposed, and 2.) the clubhouse has an occupancy rate of less than 40 people. He would
like to know if original occupancy was incorporated into this plan or if it was reduced.
Board Questions and Staff/Applicant Response
Mr. Sherrill responded that he was not aware of the size of original proposed pool. Planner Everette
confirmed that the current proposed pool is similar to the original plan.
Board Deliberation
Member Carpenter made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Board approve Brookfield Second
Filing — Tracts D and E PDP, based on the findings of fact and conclusions on page 5 of the staff
report. Member Hansen seconded. Vote: 7:0.
The Board took a 10-minute recess at 8:05pm — hearing resumed at 8:15pm
Planning & Zoning Board
February 11, 2016
Page 2
Planning Director Gloss reviewed the items on the Consent and Discussion agendas, including several
changes:
• Verizon Wireless Facility has been pulled from consent and will be moved to the second item on
the discussion agenda; and
• Gardens on Spring Creek will be continued to the April 7'", 2016, Planning and Zoning hearing.
Public Input on Items Not on the Agenda:
None noted.
Consent Agenda:
1. Draft Minutes from January 14, 2016, P&Z Hearing
2. Windsong at Rock Creek PDP
3. Talon Estates PDP Final Plan Extension of Vested Rights
4. Request for 1-Year Extension for Planned Development Overlay District (PDOD)
Vice Chair Kirkpatrick read the following statement prepared by Assistant City Attorney Yatabe:
"Any public hearing item approved on the Consent Agenda shall be considered to have been opened
and closed. The information furnished in connection with any such item and provided to this Board shall
be considered as the only evidence presented for consideration. Approval of any public hearing item as a
part of the Consent Agenda constitutes adoption by this Board of the staff recommendations, findings,
and conditions of approval for those items."
Public Input on Consent Agenda:
None noted.
Member Hart made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Board approve the February 11, 2016,
Consent agenda. Member Heinz seconded. Vote: 7:0.
Discussion Agenda:
5. Gardens at Spring Creek Major Amendment Continuance
6. Verizon Wireless Facility at Lifepointe Church
7. Brookfield Second Filing
8. Bucking Horse Filing Four Multi -Family
Assistant City Attorney Yatabe recused himself due to a conflict of interest at 6:06pm,
Sr. Assistant City Attorney Schmidt continued in his absence.
Kristin Kirkpatrick, Chair
Gerald Hart, Vice Chair
Jennifer Carpenter
Jeff Hansen
Emily Heinz
Michael Hobbs
Jeffrey Schneider
City Council Chambers
City Hall West
300 Laporte Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado
Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14
on the Comcast cable system
The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special
communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance.
Regular Hearing
February 11, 2016
Vice Chair Kirkpatrick called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Roll Call: Carpenter, Kirkpatrick, Hansen, Hart, Heinz, Hobbs, and Schneider
Absent: None
Staff Present: Gloss, Yatabe, Burnett, Shepard, Holland, Langenberger, Everette, Ragasa,
Schmidt and Cosmas
Agenda Review
Chair Kirkpatrick provided background on the board's role and what the audience could expect as to the
order of business. She described the following procedures:
• While the City staff provides comprehensive information about each project under consideration,
citizen input is valued and appreciated.
• The Board is here to listen to citizen comments. Each citizen may address the Board once for
each item.
• Decisions on development projects are based on judgment of compliance or non-compliance with
city Land Use Code.
• Should a citizen wish to address the Board on items other than what is on the agenda, time will
be allowed for that as well.
• This is a legal hearing, and the Chair will moderate for the usual civility and fairness to ensure
that everyone who wishes to speak can be heard.