Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVENCOR, FORT COLLINS NURSING CARE - PDP/FDP - 23-97 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYHCS: Unsignalized intersections Release 2.1d Page Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (N-S) site access (E-W) southridge greens Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 8/18�7 Other Information......... am m short long Two-way Stop -controlled Inters tion Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R I L T R No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 ; 1 1 0 ; 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N; N Volumes 30 1; 10 55 1 10 PHF .9 .9; .9 .9 ; .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%)I CV's (%) PCE's 11.10 11.10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street N8 SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 34 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1331 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1331 Prob. of Queue -Free State: ------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Step 2: LTfromMajorStreet - - WBEB - ------------------------ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 34 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1652 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1652 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB 58 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 106 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 919 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 912 Adjustment Factors intersection Performance Summary Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95% Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach ---------------------------------------------------------------- Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Levi Turn Major Roa-, 5.00 2_10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (peph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) .. z turn Minor i oad 5.50 2.60 ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ ----- _________ Throuch Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 NB L i 912 > Le-- Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 1286 2.8 0.0 A 2.8 N6 R 1= 1331 > WS L i2 1652 2.2 0.0 A 0.3 intersection belay = 0.5 sec/veh u HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 1 _ HCS: Unsignalized intersections Release 2.1d Page 2 Center- For Microcomputers In Transportation -------------- University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 ________________________________________________________ Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (N-S) site access (E-W) ------- southridge greens ---------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) ---------- 62 Major Street Direction.... EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1288 - Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1288 Analyst ................... mjd Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 Date of Analysis.......... 8/18/97 --------------------------------------------------- Other Information ........ ( am pm short long Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Two-way Stop -controlled In errection -------------------------------------------------------- _________________—____________—______________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 62 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1602 L T R; L T R 1 L T R L T R Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1602 �____ ____ ________ ____ ____-___ --__ ---_ ____ ____ ____ Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 No. Lanes 0 1< 0 ; 1 i 0 1 0 > 0 < 0 1 0 0 0 ________________________________________________________ Stop/Yield Ni N: Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Volumes 55 1; 15 15 1 101 ----------------------------------------------------- PHF .9 .9I .9 .9 .9 .9', Conflicting Flows: (vph) 96 Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 932 MC's (%) Major LT. Minor TH SU/RV's (%); Impedance Factor: 0.99 C V's (%) Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.99 PCE's 11.10 :1.10 1.10; Capacity Adjustment Factor _______________________________________________________________________ due to impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 921 Adjustment Factors intersection Performance Summary Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95% Maneuver Gap (to) Time (tf) Flow Move Sna-ed Total Queue Approach --------------------------------------------------------------- "rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Left Turn Major Road 5.0c 2.10 Movement (oconj (ccon) (ncph)(sec:veh) (veh) (secj veh) Right Turn Minor Road = ^ 2.60 ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ _____ _________ Through Traffic Minor Road 5.00 3.30 NE L 92l > Left Turn Minor Road _.5i 3.40 1250 2.9 0.0 A 2.9 N5 R ,_ .2EE set/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation _ University of Florida 512 Well Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0376 Streets: (N-S) iemay (E-W) southridge greens Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 6/16/97 Other Information......... am cE short long Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ! Northbound ; Southbound Eastbound Westbound ! L T R ! L T R ; L T R ! L T R --------!---- ---- --- ---- --- ----I---- ---- --- No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 i 1 1 < 0 1 1 1 Stop/Yield N! N! Volumes 10 444 15! 110 588 50! 25 5 10I 10 5 60 PHF ; .9 .9 .9! .9 .9 .91 .9 .9 .9; .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) j SO/RV's CV's (%> PCE's !1.10 !1.10 !1.10 1.10 1.10!1.10 1.10 1.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Maneuver Gap (tg) ---------------------------------------------- _es- Turn Major Roac 5.50 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 Throuah Traffic Minor Road 6.50 _eft Turn Minor Roac 7.00 Follow-up Time (tf) 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 HCS: Unsianalized Intersections Release 2.1d Paoe 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------------------ Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 255 354 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1028 916 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1026 916 Prop. of Oueue-Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.93 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street --------------------------- NB ___-_ -------56- Conflicting Flows: (vph) -------- 510 709 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 913 714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 913 714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.85 0.98 Step 3: TH from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1344 1324 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 175 183 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.84 0.84 Movement Caoacitv: (pcph) 149 154 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.95 0.95 Stec _': LT from Minor Street W5 EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (voh) i290 13i0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 158 154 Major LT, Minor T'r. imoedance Factor: 0.80 0.80 Acjusted impedance Factor: 0.65 0.65 Capecitv Adjustment Factor cue t-c impeeinc Movements 0.84 _.7;. Moveme-_ Capacity: (peon) -------------------------------------------------------- i32 i2i =-tersection Perfcrmance Summary Av-. =10.. f: 'e Shared To7=1 to=_= -_❑ __ Ra Le __= Gap De'av (pcph)(sec: -- ________ ______ ______ _____________ _______ _____ ______, =o - _- _ > w: 1� 132 30.0 U.L U WE 7 id9 25.4 D-U D 6.7 WS R 74 1026 3.8 0.1 A 12 714 55 L 134 9i3 4.6 0.6 A C.- Intersection Delay = i_F secjveh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.id Page Center For Microcomputers in Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0376 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (N-S) lemay (E-W) southridge greens Major Street Direction...- NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst-. ................. mjd Date of Analysis.......... 6/i6/97 Other Information........m Pm short long Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Northbound I Southbound Eastbound ! Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R �____ ____ ____i____ ____ ____-_-_ ____ ___-____ ___- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 1 Stop/Yield N; N Volumes 10 384 5I 25 312 15; 50 5 10: 15 5 80 PHF .9 .9 .9; .9 .9 .9; .9 .9 .9; .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 Mc's (%) ! SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ;1.10 ;1. 10 10 1.10 1.101. 10 i.i0 1.10 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn major Roac 5.50 .10 Right Turn Minor Road 6.50 2.60 Throuc-, Traffic Minor Road 50 3.30 Left Turn Minor 7.00 ...40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2-id Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 216 182 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1076 1120 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1076 1120 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.91 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street _____________________________ ______ Conflicting Flows: (vph) -- _SB___________NB 433 364 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1004 1093 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1004 1093 Prop. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.97 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor StreetWB --------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) -----------EB 833 828 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 355 358 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0-96 0.96 Movement Capacity: (peen) 3d0 343 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: ------------------ 0.96 0.96 ------------------------------------ Step 4: LT from Minor Street W5 E6 ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: 516 824 Potential Capacity: (ccpn) 3i6 315 Major LT, Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.94 0.94 .Adjusted impedance Factor: _.__ 0.95 Capacity Adjustment Factor pue to impedino Movement-_ _.:=� 0.c7 Movement Capacity: (pcpnj -------------------------------------------------------- Flow Move _=roa=n Rate C_❑ __ _-i=� __ _ 'C_. __�_�• •:-Yemen- (Cs") (=a-. ________ ______ ______ _____ _______ _______ _____ EE L 62 --------- 14 _ W6 L 19 30 C WB T 7 340 1G. =- .- C 5.4 WS R 96 a -NB L 12 1093 A 0.1 56 L 31 1004 3.i �.C' A 0.3 - intersection Delay = 1 sec/veh APPENDIX E HCS: Unsignaiized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 1 Center For Microcomputers -In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hail Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) site access (E-W) southridg e greens Major Street Direction_.,. EW Lenoth of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 8/16/97 Other information ......... am pm hort -long Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound ' Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 1 1 0 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N! N; Volumes 30 11 10 55 1 10; PHF .9 .9; .9 .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%); CV's (%) PCE's I1.10 i1_10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ HCS: Unsignaiized Intersections Release 2.1d ---------------------------------------------- ______________________________________________ Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 34 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1331 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1331 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 ---------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street --------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) -_WB --------- 34 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1652 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1652 Prob. of Queue -Free ---------------------------------------------------- State: 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB ---------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 106 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 919 Major LT, Minor TH impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: ---------------------------------------------------- (c_phj 912 Pape 2 SE; -Eb SB Adjustment Factors intersection Performance Summary Vehicle Critical Folio. -up Avg. 95% Maneuver Gap (t_ Tim2 !-`) Flo= Movevueue J'-ep Approach ------------------------------------------------------------ Rate vac De LEnptH LGS Delav Left Turn Major Road 5.0D "..= Movement (pcohj (o-c-hj (e cph ',s2c; +2n; ivsn) (sec/veh) Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 ________ ______ ______ ______ ---- -_ _______ _____ _____-_-_ Through Traffic Minor Road 6.0: No L Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 HCS: Unsipnaiized intersections Release 2.1d Pape 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (N-S) site access (E-W) southridge greens Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/97 Other Information ........ .am pm short long Two-way Stop -controlled Intersectio ----------- ______________________________________________________ Eastbound Westbound Northbound 1 Southbound L T R L T R L T R I L T R No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 1 1 1 0 ; 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N; N; Volumes 55 1; 15 15 1 10; PHF .9 .9; .9 .9 .9 .9 Grade ; 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%} CV's C%) PCE's ------------------------------------------------------------------ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up maneuver __________________________________________________________________ Gap (mg) Time (tf) Turn nejor Roac 5.00 2.10 R<'. p-t Turn ."nor Roac 5.50 2.60 Tnrougn Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Burn Minor Road 6.50 a.40 HCS: Unsipnaiized Intersections Release 2-id Pape 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step is RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 62 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1268 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1288 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street------------- WBEB ____________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) ----------- 62 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1602 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1602 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Stec 4: LT from Minor Street ________________________________________________________ NB 58 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 96 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 932 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.99 Caoa^_ity Adjustment Factor cue t_ impecinc Movements 0.99 movement Capacity: (ccph) --------- --------------------------------------------- 921 intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% glow Move Shared Tctal Queue Aperoacn Rate =ac Cap i_lay Length LOS Delay i^ a men t (p cp-) 1c_p:-) (ccpn)isec/veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ (veh) _______ _______ (sez ven) > _____ _________ i 250 _.9 0.0 A _.- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 1 ------------------ _________________________________________________ ------- HCS: Unsignalized intersections Release "'.1d Page 2 Center For Microcomputers in Transportation"---------______---- --------------------- -----________----- _______________ University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 ________________________________________________________ Ph: (904) 392-0376 - Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB ----------------------- Streets: (N-S) lemay (E-W) southridge greens Conflictinq Flows: (vph) 210 298 Major Street Direction.... NS Potential Capacity: (pcph) i084 978 Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1084 978 Analyst ................... mjd Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.93 0.99 Date of Analysis.......... 8/18/7 - ___________________________________________ _____________ Other Information......... am pm snort long Step 2: LT from Major Street 56 N5 Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- --- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 420 596 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1020 82i L T R L T R L T R L T R Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1020 821 '---- --------;---- ---- -- ---- ---- -------- ---- -_-_ Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.61, 0.99 No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 1 ________________________________________________________ Stop/Yield N; NI Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Volumes 10 363 15; 110 486 S0; 25 5 10; 10 5 60 -------------------------------------------------------- PHF .9 .9 .9I .9 .9 .9I .9 .9 .9I .9 .9 .9 Conflictinq Flows: (vph) 1140 1121 Grade 0 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 235 241 Mc's (%) i Capacity Adjustment Factor SU/RV's (%); due to impeding Movements 0.86 0.86 Cv's (%) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 201 2Oz PCE's :1.10 i.10 I1.i0 1.i0 _______________________________________________________________________ 1.10i1.10 1.10 1.10 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- n :,97 Step 4: LT from Minor Street ------------------------------------------------------ WS E6 ConfTictinc Flows: (vph) i08c iiu�. Acjus_ment Factors Potential Capacity: (pcph) 2i: ij6 Major LT, Minor TH Vehicle Critical Follow-up impedance Factor: _ 0.83 Maneuver Gac i-=) Time (if) Adjusted impedance Factor: ,. '.• :.27 __________________________________________________________________ Capacity Adjustment Factor '_ Turn Major Roa= _ = 2 - i due to impecinc Movements _.__ =.81 Right Turn Minor Roac 5. 5'J 2.60 Movement Caoac4ty: (pcph) 182 iS6 Tnrouph Traffic minor Roac. t_`J ,0 _________________________________________ _______________ iurn Minor Roac -.4i' intersection PErfcrma r._E Su r..mary =io'- hove snare= I--_ __=_e -.__r- a _n Movement (c _�-. .-.pr,i (c=❑,i .,_=_. ___ __!cc_ ______ ____ _ a ,.e-, EB L ,. . EG T 2V6 - E6 k ii 978 _ii _W6 L i2 _ 162 0-9 Ne• L - 12 621 _4 56 L 134 1020 4,1 :.`_ 0.7 - _ -intersection Delav = 1.6 secvven HCS: Unsionalized intersections Release '.id Paae Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2063 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-5) lemay (E-W) southridge greens Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analvst................... mid Date of Analvsis.......... 8i16/97 .am Other Information........om short long Two-way Stop -controlled intersection Northbound 5outhboundI Eastbound Westbound L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R L T R --- ---- ---- I --- ---- --- I ---- --- ---- ---- ---- --- No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 i 1 < 0 1 1 i Stop/Yield N1 N Volumes 10 321 5; 25 240 15; 50 5 10: 15 5 80 PHF .4 .9 .91 .9 .9 _9; .9 .9 .9; .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 11.10 1.i0 1. i0; i_10 i.i0 1.10 ----------- --------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors venic re Critical Fol low-ua Maneuver Gap (tg) Time ___-__V_'_-=_____-________________________________________ Left Turn M-tor clad 550 Turn Minor road 5.50 In,^J'Y_❑ Tra"C c ..JaC 6.50 HCS: Unsignaiized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) i82 142 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 5120 1173 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1120 1173 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.9i 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street ---------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) _ _---S6------- 363 _ -NB 284 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1094 1207 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1094 1207 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0_99 -------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street - -0__-------97 WB EB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 683 678 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 435 435 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.96 0.96 . Movement Capacity: (ocph) 418 421 Grob. of Queue -Free State: 980_98 -------------------------- -------------0_ Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- --------- WB Eb Conflicting Flows: tvph) 666 674 Potential Capacity: (pcoh) 396 393 Major LT. Minor Tr. impedance Factor: 0.95 0.95 Adjusted impedance Factor: 0.96 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due tJ imDecinc Movements 0.95 ?.87 Movement ;; a:,acity: (econ) 376 344 .^:E.^52CL1On Performance Summary Avg. 95z `io- Move Snared Total Queue A.ccroach -a= Delay Lerr_t-. __z. Delay ..ement .___ , rc-cn) (_cch)(seef,ehl ________ ______ ______ ______ (ven) isez/ven) GC 3.44 _______ _______ _____ _________ 421 > C. > W° _ i9 376 10.1 0.0 C_ WE. T - 4i8 8.8 0.0 E. 4.8 i120 3.5 0.2 A N3 L 12 1207 3.0 0.0 A 0.1 L 3t DJ4 3.4 0.0 A 0.3 - ,intersection Delay = 1.7 sec/ven APPENDIX D t Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level or serfice - cDnnemvity iawwraim amml base connectivity: C I specific connections to priority sites: description of apviicable destination area within 1,:20' including address Fill F [3 destination area classification (see text) �' City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual COS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure-6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: a ID IF] >*pii�13. destination area within 1,320' indudinst address I -rcN C 4vi=ct4 I G P, E�'v M,2aOAaur Orf c_ Ae- (niter as manv as aepiv) destination area I level of service (minimum based on proiet; location classification) ciassification (see text) anmves ! r-� 4,15 east nmvcntm actual I AA, II 5 11 C( 3 II proposed City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan APPENDIX C HCs: unsignalized intersections Release 2.Id Pacie 1 Center For Micro.oIaouter'_ In iransportation University of Flnr ida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32Eii-2033 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets (N-5) lemay==== (E-W) southridge greens MajorStreet Piiractian.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Date of Analysis.......... 6/15/97 Other Information......... am prn 1997 short long Two-way 5top-controlled inters e* ion Northbound Southbound Eastbound I Westbound I_ T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ----I---- ---- --- ---- --- ---- 1---- No. Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 < 0 1 I < 0 1 1 1 Stop/Yield NI Volumes 5 235 i5, i0a 502 1; 5 1 6; 9 1 56 PHF .9 .y .9; .9 .9 .9; .9 .9 .9; .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) i i SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) i PCE's 11.10 i.10 i1.10 1.10 1.10;1.10 1.10 1.10 ------------- ---------------- -------------- ------------------ Adjustment =actors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver G=- ',g) Time (tf) _________________________________-______--___________________-^___ Left Turn Ma i:•r :lad -5'- 2. Right Turn .: -.cr ..cad =0 .`.0 Through Tra'f�:c Left Turn Mine- ;.ad f J-- HCS: Unsignali _•d in ter:;ect ions Release 2.id Page 2 Worusheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Sb-eet WE E6 Conflicting F-'nws: (vph) 140 168 Potential Capa�ity- 1p:Ph) 1176 i136 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1175 ii38 Prob. of Queue-F;-e.. State: 0.94 0.99 Step 2--LT F-c„_----Major Street ______-____ NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 281 337 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1211 i130 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 121i 1130 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.89 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from.. Minor Street WS EB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 736 -44 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 405 400 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movcmenta 0.89 0.as Movement Caoacity: iPcoh) 359 354 'Prob. of Queue --Free State: 1.00 -----------p 1.00 -------------------------------------- Step 4: LT fr_❑ Minor 5_reet ---------------------------- W°. ES - ----------------- Conflicting Flows: ivpti) -"- 72 Potential Capacity: (PcPh) ;-- 363 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.59 C.d3 Adjusted impedance Fectcr: 0.91 C.9i Capacity Adjustment Factor due t- ;r„ped'rig Mo.emerts ...90 0.85 Movement Capacity. (c cp n; ----- ---------------------------- 325 -- - 311 intersection ✓er,crmance t F .cw Move =r re'_ _A�c.5 Tcttl -c_roacn Movement ,"_--:1 z CG-iC___, ______ ------- ______ -�.-------- ------- ____- E5 T ES R 7:30 =i3 -.2 2.; r WB T 1 "-- ._ _ 4.4 NB L 7 12.3 0.0 a 0.1 S6 L '21i �.- C._ - - _ 0.9 i - £r.t crse C.ion Delay = i... ___; 'eh HCS: Un.sionalized Intersections Release 2.1d .page Center For Micro:•omputer= In Transportation University of Flnrica 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL-2611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 --------------------------------------------- Streets: (N-S) lemay (E-W) southridge. greens Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis........ 6/15/97 Other- Information....... .am pm 1997 short long Two-way Stop controlled L, errection Northbound `outhbound ' Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R I �___- ____ ____---- ___- ______-- ____ ________ ____ No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 1 Stop/Yield N; N; Volumes 4 200 2; 25 173 11 2 1 5; 11 2 78 PHF .9 .9 .9; .S 9 .9; .9 .9 .9; .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) I SU/RV's CV's (%) PCE's ;1.10 l.io 1.10;1.10 1.10 1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left T_rn Mej - p.­c 5.50 - io night Turn Miner -.^ad _.50 _.6J Thr u,.or = .oad E.50 - 30 Turn .. ,. =, _ac 7.00 3.4 HCS; Unsipnaliced in tersecticrs release 2_id Page 2 Wor b,:h aet for TW_.0 Intersection ' -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Miner Street WB ---------- E6 ------------------ ------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vch) 112 96 Potential Capacity: (o,=ph) 1215 i238 Movement: Capacity: (p ph) 1215 1238 Prob. of State- 0.92 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major ':�tr-eet _5 N8 -----------`------------------------------------------ Conflicting Flows: lvph) 224 193 Potential Capacity: (peon) 1300 i350 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1300 1350 Prob. of Queue -Free States: 0.98 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB E8 _______________________________________________._________ Conflicting Flows: (voh) 448 448 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 597 597 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.47 0.97 Movement Capacity: (ccoht 581 =61 Prob. of Queue -Free state: 1.00 I.Oo -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from M,incr _.•_reef: WB E5 ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 447 446 Potential Capa;;izy. (ocpn) 140 547 Major LT, Minor Tr' Impedance Factor: 2.97 0.97 Adjusted Impedance Fertor: C'.96 0.9e Capacity AdjuStm-n'_ =actor due to If11pe� ir:C : z�z �-lcnts 0.97 _.90 Movement 1'.3pac.' , .� --------------------------------- �33 ------------------ .L intersa a'. or. Perfcrmance Summa-y Avg. 95e F io-- - •ve .ha -e.. Total Queue Approach C Delay Le -_ ay !'oc sment (=- _.. .=cx; lc=_ ________ ______ ______ ______ (sec/veht a _______ _ (-c:i':e`,) 6.9 i. 0.0 We R =_ ._1i 3.. 6.2 Nc L t i SC 2.7 u_0 A 0.1 _C L _.b i.0 A 0.4 0.9 sec/veh APPENDIX B MATMEW J. DELICH , P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 c TABULAR StM'IARY OF VEHICLE: COL Observer `� �C City ;7Ooe' caf C i oj s AND J D U T-* rt t) c F C. e�ys M� �- V � iNTERSEC . tON OF E7M! AY A V =AiU� C S = Mom mm gm L c left tum EM AV �Er? 4`I scscrrr+2i DC: F T[lTAL Iuww1►► AL TIME from NORTH I � 1 V i from S u7m ?ftm from EAST fros. vv , ' � ALL BEGINS 11 R S' L Total II R, S I: I Totai 5oum R I S j L l T= !� R( S I L C Tate! wes 7301101701`31 78111 11071zItlo la$ IIZ9i oIZ131 0 I j 0 it ! 0 330-ezt 745I{o!g�313!8C0110189!n! $� N/7Stsl© IZ I /711 t la {oi ! 18 IIl93 Too 110157 1 8 1 G5 110 1-7? ! ► 30 I t¢5 ;itsl IZ ! 1 H Z I !C3 i 2 w Z-7 65- II t -7 �'tSil1 17$I(v! �SIII II I I I II Is9iI I I I�( 014fo 111Et1 t Is1Z5il/ I � ►I I I i II IvZ� I I I d 1ir73 II 73o-moll I IZR d 125131 411 Z 13 3414- 13 4 011 to s 4 117$1 Z I t 1 1 9 1 II s l 0 1 Z 1 7 II I it 9 g 1176 2 11 O 0 ii i 1 1 11 II 430110 Itz I tglly6 1921 o 1 yq 11 3 0Il tsl 0 l o l/ 5 I 1 111 1 t I 1 1 3 I®1 o 11lei2 I I6 IIA76 445-1t It 3713 ZI17o110 1 W1zl 70 11JL6011tZlo /611o1a 13 1 (3 o I ! � � 7 IlaSv sr� s!S11 l0 11231Z o It15 I/y Ilr 7,1/y7113 ! 17- I/a Has7 1 3 ! 1 113511Aga II 1-0 10 1/41 O IZI /6 IZ to to 1 H l8 113oo ly/ 7 /oa9 11591 6 1 (11 67 1161 151 12, 11 Z 2/lob �1860 APPENDIX A Table 3 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Lem4y/Southridge Greens (stop sign) EB LT C D EB T/RT B B WB LT C D WB T B C WB RT A A NB LT A A SB LT A A Overall A A Southridge Greens/Site Access (stop sign) NB LT/RT A A WB LT A A Overall A A Table 4 Long Range Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Lemay/Southridge Greens (stop sign) EB LT C E EB T/RT B C WB LT C D WB T C D WB RT A A NB LT A B SB LT A A Overall A A Southridge Greens/Site Access (stop sign) NB LT/RT A A WB LT A A Overall A A AM / PM Rounded to the nearest 6 vehicles. -+-15/55 /--15/10 NOM. 0 zo a w J 0 o s0/60 SOUTHRIDGE c4 15/5 GREENS �r—ls/to BOULEVARD 50/25 5- 5 oLnLn 10 10� o�,o LO to LO SHORT RANGE TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 AL AM / PM N Rounded to the nearest 6 vehicles. a i W J 0 mo N 80/60 SOUTHRIDGE -15/55 -15/10 GREENS �r BOULEVARD 55 30 - NOM, - I 50 /r25 5 5 -� C:) C) ,o1,0--- )� a�� �o LONG RANGE TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 4 AM / PM N a W J co \� 78/58 SOUTHRIDGE I� N + 2 ° GREENS BOULEVARD RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 1 AM/PM N OUTHRIDGE GREENS IOULEVARD SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 t I ` / Table 1 Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak .Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in but Congregate Care Facility 215 4 2 9 8 100 DU (Rate) (2.15) (0.037) (0.023) (0.095) (0.075) Nursing Home - 100 beds 260 12 7 7 10 (Rate) (2.60) (0.120) (0.070) (0.071) (0.099) Table 2 Current Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Lemay/Southridge Greens (stop sign) EB LT B C EB T/RT A A WB LT B C WB T B C WB RT A A NB LT A A SB LT A A Overall A A the median to have a left -turn lane and a through/right-turn combined lane, which is the approach geometry of a collector street. This will allow 6-8 feet for an on -street bike lane. North of th- median (westbound), there is enough width to have one through 1i plus a 9-10 foot bike lane. As indicated on the site plan, the :,edian can transition to provide a left- irn lane on Sov�-h-idge Or.eens Boulevard at the site access. Sidew,lks will be built on Southridge Greens Hoiflevard along the frontage of the site. This sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalks on Lemay Avenue and the east leg of Southridge Greens Boulevard. Future developments to the west will build the sidewalk along their frontages. This will complete the pedestrian system in this area. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix C. If the City chooses not to stripe crosswalks at the Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection with current traffic and pedestrian activity, then crosswalks would not be required with this development. It is expected that this facility will generate very little off -site pedestrian traffic. There are bike lanes on Lemay Avenue. Since Lemay Avenue is adjacent to the site, there will be excellent connectivity for bicyclists. However, this site will not likely generate significant bicycle traffic. A Bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix C. The west leg of Southridge Greens Boulevard is classified as a local street and, as such, does not require bike lanes. However, as discussed above, there is adequate width to stripe bike lanes on the west leg. The City may want to undertake this effort. Acr.ordinq t.o the 2015 Transit System map, Transfort will have a feeder rotil.o on Lemay Avenue. This route will have 30 minute service. It will attain a level of service B rating if the 30 minute service operates for 16 hours a day. It is concluded that the Vencor Fort Collins - Nursing Care Center will meet; acceptable levels of service for transit, pedestrian, bicycle, and motor vehicle transportation modes. allows for separate left -turn lanes. Observation indicates that it operates this way. Figure 1 shows the peak hour traffic counts at the Lemay/ Southridge Greens intersection. Raw count data is provided in Appendix A. This intersection operates acceptably as indicated in Table 2. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. This area is not served by Transfort. According to the Fort Collins Transit Development Plan (1996-2002), transit service will not be extended down Lemay Avenue. Under these circumstances, the transit level of service is considered to be F. There are/will be on -street bike lanes on Lemay Avenue. These lanes connect to existing lanes to the north and to Harmony Road, providing both east/west and north/south connectivity throughout the city. To the south, there are gaps in the bike system that will be completed as both public and private properties complete the street system. Southridge Greens Boulevard is a collector street east of Lemay Avenue, but bike lanes are not striped. This street is wide enough to accommodate bike lanes, if the City desires to stripe them. This striping is not the responsibility of this development. A Bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix C. There are sidewalks along both Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard, except for the frontage of this site along Southridge Greens Boulevard. The existing sidewalks either meet the'current standard or the standard that was in effect when they were built. It is expected that this development will complete the sidewalk along the frontage along Southridge Greens Boulevard. It is expected that there will be crosswalks at the Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection. A Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix C. Figure 2 shows the site generated peak hour traffic at the key intersection. Figure 3 shows the short range total peak hour traffic at the Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection and the Southridge Greens/Site Access intersection. This forecast includes the existing traffic, traffic from previous Miramont traffic studies, traffic from the recently submitted Stanton Creek residential development, and the site generated traffic. This intersection will operate acceptably as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix D. Figure 4 shows the long range total peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Table 4 shows the peak hour operation. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix E. The key intersections will operate acceptably. The eastbound left turns that operate at level of service E do have alternative routes through signalized intersections to the north. There will not be left -turn lane conflicts along the west leg of Southridge Greens Boulevard. There is adequate width south of r co M MEMORANDUM LO o CO Co • ,LO TO: Dave Klockeman, J R Engineering °o Eric Bracke, Fort Collins Traffic Engineer oco Fort Collins Planning Department J U FROM: Matt De 1 i ch c� • X z u`. DATE: August 18, 1997 a J Ed SUBJECT: Huntington Hills, Parcel A - Vencor Fort Collins - -i Nursing Care Center traffic study (File: 9745MEM2) W > cn C) CV Cc � A nursing care facility is proposed to be located on Z T Huntington Hills, Parcel A. The site is west of Lemay Avenue a and south of Southridge Greens Boulevard. This facility will = a' have 100 beds and have 60 employees. The 60 employees are w z distributed over three 8 hour shifts. Employee shift changes o will occur at non -peak times. Access to the site is proposed C\Jn from Southridge Greens Boulevard at a location approximately 500 feet west of Lemay Avenue. City staff requested a brief N technical memorandum rather than a detailed transportation impact study. The proposed use will generate traffic that will be over the 50 daily trip threshold that requires a traffic study. This threshold is extremely low compared to industry standards. The trip generation for the proposed use was calculated using data contained in Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE. This specific use was not included as a land use. Therefore, two similar uses were selected to determine the future trip generation. The two uses were Congregate Care (code 252) and Nursing Home (code 620). Table 1 shows the calculated trip Q. a generation for these two categories. Discussions with health w care providers indicated that the calculated trip generation = z was appropriate for this type of facility. The expected trip V generation is 215-260 daily trip ends, 8-19 morning peak hour z trip ends, and 17 afternoon peak hour trip ends. J W 0 o The public street network in the area is essentially F complete. During the site visit (8/15/97), it was noted that o Lemay Avenue was recently paved, but not striped. However, 7 W there were paint marks noting where the lane lines would be. ` Both north and south of Southridge Greens Boulevard, Lemay S Avenue has a curb to curb width of 70 feet. It will be UJ as striped with two lanes northbound and two lanes southbound. _ It will have left -turn lanes at the Southridge Greens LL Boulevard intersection. It will also have 6 foot bike lanes on each side of the street. There are 5 foot walks on each Q side of Lemay Avenue with a parkway between the sidewalk and the curb. There is no striping on either leg of Southridge Greens Boulevard. The width of the east and west approaches