HomeMy WebLinkAboutTURNER RESIDENCE, 1401 W. MOUNTAIN AVE. - BASIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - BDR160012 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - VARIANCE REQUESTUAVID HUEiER
�JAGIC'in`pil; IOHLETER GJ'J-
970.567.4805
Date: 6-16-16
Turner 2/12 Roof Pitch
1401 West Mountain Ave.
Fort Collins , Colorado
DAVIDHUETERDESIGN
CL4kvn Hone Design • Inleror OW • Remodel I IMIm Design
I
Sol
g
IQB';��'i. � �i s r r
.eo ..
�a�+e i������ � its � sr�srsrurs •
MEN
add
� -.!:
OWN ft
tr.��!r
�w_ow= s■r �aw_G_sw=L'=s■— a.— q..:a:=�'..,rs■— —�_.�a sr._
10
DAVIDHUETERDESIGN
Cusian Hare Design • Intew Deso • Remodel / Wtw Design
H
rH I
DAVIDHUETERDESIGN
Custmn Home Oesgn • Interim OW • Remodel / OMlw MW
H
1. .ti 1, �JI 'j•��5� � . }j .
10
DAVIDHUETERDESIGN
Custom Dome Mign • Mev Desk • Remodel I Ad hm ftW
tow
I%
DAVIDHUETERDESIGN
CWM Nome DeSW • krileve De* • Remodel I
H
E
DAVIDHUETERDESIGN
Custom Home Dns o • Intuv OesiM • Remodel I IdSdion Design
IL I - �I
I0L
MOW
r -
Fli
ME o
t
I:1
f.7
DAVIDHUI-iI-RDESIGN
c, vnn Home Design • Inl"or Desgn • RemnAel / OW,ofi Design
EmiNo
..-,_ `ACCESS PNA
� Em,ralrtoRM�
owE+SEET
� 0.QLATF'bmll
Y
a cruTE.sw A
ACCESS
• EKIaTrApe `� '
6CEWlALt \
1
A I
z
z
J I
/._
S TEroI i
PAV@FEM ,0.
EASTNOgWENAv E , N � � ,�
4b� � 1 a• __�Ls-
_TE TGEm,NO
GRADING PLAN FOR
1401 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE
LOT 1 AND THE EAST 36 FEET OF LOT 2, BLOCK 4, SCOTT-SHERWOOD ADDITION (REC. NO. 106131).
CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
S. MCI INLEY AVE r i
` i'e� 91DfWAnt
—. ---DSA
� LN
_--Nt�-
= y
WF1L
— —
FFE=W"
K A
1
sr Rpe6
_
DwADEsrEPa
I
T
OOYMSPoIrt
I DID
x"
I
ro
rnnopv i
WaL
__
m
OIECIWIGE MO SWALE
E
oe
_
BAI SLWE PI TO
"a- VASES VARIES BATCH SIDEWALK
EDGE
GSINSEEof vrES SEE III ELrLI
-
SECTION A -A
a
IR
1,N
`— EroEmS ING
PAVEMENT
a
'f]ES
�
'T
sA]
—
% 6' Tl
,
D01Wl8POOi,c
D,scruNGE
wML�ouTro
gSLFNROE MI09W4E
iNTD FLLEv
Y
'
2
>
INA eEWNmsnnc
6//pp DAEV.
Y-D•
8"AE"A alb
GI DLE
41E4 PLATE
VAM[8, SEE
PLAxs
-SEE OETAa I
S
]
SECTION B-S
]/T BRASS SWEW-18" O.C.
WM CWNhRBllNN XEID EWSN
GUTTER
PLATE
MM PLA E
NMD" AM> ]"
..
On
0.0
BAMA• OO
µEEE
SECTION C-C
DETAIL
FENCE
EWTIq
OVFRNFAD MLT'
DISCLAIMER STATEMENT:
TNT. [Iv. Nr. Fwn n..w.ef EI N. LM1 M Fw[ CMAn. b m4.NF. lY,wan ixa rc..¢r :>r...[i:r
y Evnwwq 2Ame,n Be Gtl el Fvl Lim EINF,® wM rlq aFVICJn In mC� mlen®
q m. dcwaem fuMwm+AN.•.rnx Jo.. not v,pv tlNp�.NF a,N�.mMIN.'A AA MNW pmKNs
NR.V.a Tn.IA... wvnolNmnSVVNManY AAA®n..a�e..A amm,o+I.momREHr vrMaly o,.o+
cane. rs.nmrA.N m,Ayr . a iimm.NA.n AAI,.q N A.aAANa:.m F. m,weia q.+A
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: _
IMtlY.O-BYSONAI
m,Fh uc4on PYA nV F pgvA]
.Z Ao.r•IaJn. N
SAAAA1 lyr
rdmMaaWS.SAYAI
ImFonwA M e»m...Saa
w,ma
i.neAvonF nw I Iwa nays ..
B...INv
NORTH
o
10 D tD na ]D Fut
m
M FEET )
I wa+ 10fl
LEGEND:
PRO OSED CONTIOUR -�
Ex6TWG OONTO E =Y'
IAOPERLY SALES
ogcVEPTY IOUNwRY
mi
FPOPOSEDEPOTELENATION ]
`
o
Q
E.V BTNO SPOF EIEVATIOX
=PUPwEo aoPEs A_aA
NOTES:
TIE 64E MEAND IIXJ.TNMI OF41µPYN VNGER6ENIUM URITFS YIF
ANAOAMTEWNEN gNI/PI an MESE DMvnN6 rtblYLI eE TE
PESPONSRRRY w tl! CONTMGTOP i0 vFNF1' llff Ep4tBICE OF NL
IE WOPot BEFORE LOLy1LL
91NLLBEREAPON84EFOPLOGING
.EAoO STNN TRmESMTE. CMRS
NLIV
Z
Pll VNDENOMEINO UIILITIE9 µD SWYl EE PEBPONSfLE iOR FM Nl
DEANNOUNM.TNECgI1MNIAL
UNNN0.M! VNRPtliOVND VRIlSi9
: WELL TO INE qqT FOR wr AREAS TRAC, INS EASEM LOT pyEMION3.
p a+
UTNIU EASEIffi.YTs. ODES EASESIENTS AM OTIML SVRVnY WFOIW.TOM
L,
�4��n �i€{
GENERA. NOTES 41.b AS LISTED IN APPENDIX E.1 M THE IAIOIER CLAI
�5 44 II
UPMN AREA STREET STµDMDS UCLA I ENVL NnY AND BE FOLLOWED FOR
T6 PROJECT.
7 T y pp
A t>E coxsmucTon NOTES We+aesErnoNSGRAnoxi Aw EPoslDx3�1
COIITIICK MOVE µD.. ONA,AI NOTES IN UiFNmA E'AOF THE LARMBI
LOIpttURBANAFEAONSCT SAPIILWSaCUAS41 STV1L AFTLY AND CE
FQLONF p BY MS FROIEGT AS APflI W lE
S TIE TOP OF FOIWwTION ELEI EN. ARE TEE NNWUA ELEVA..
NEONAMO F OR PROTECTION F MAN THE I 0 VR STpWA
PROJECT BENCHMARKS:
PRoiECT DATUM MVU AN
clry OF FOR TCQIIxs BBiCMMN. AI A
NpCoACE N CORNEA GFYS)IEASY ST µ0
WIEDBEN- 1.ACONLPL•rEtPKPlc 9r KBI.E
EIEVAIN)N .BIIYI
CffY W Etl NLINR .
MCCINKERLANORTEAEANsNFbps
$I OA COCNETE TAAI SAGNK6VE ELEVAT1011.S0A1.6
PLEASE NOiE T6 RAN SET q UYxG MvpN PpIA VFRIIGLDAMI
fl RTNOLL ATLAS OPHIe1R MYE VSEO NGVDA IMFDAb1FD FOPTNN
vLBSTEAL wNMB
ENG LNUMDAIBIEDOATANIREGUIIEDTONANv PUI90 OTIEFOLLO M
BOONTON SM ID BE VEEP.
... UNADAISTHI . N.I. -3 OT
VLL MEIJI MTBNNAToN rE.OF
DMOMDO
om•
K.IASNoEbebx.
Call before pou ft,
m'NNAAII m.aTs,n`A..�a`'
City of Fort Collins, Colorado
UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL
µ NIENED:
rnl BAtl�
oe.
CHECKED BY:
•Ft.r ! lfule..4r ULEH I
"I
CHECKED BY:
III , ILA
INIA
CHECKED eY
PVL. i-R-11.—
DAY
CECKED BY
�r•BSN IAm
CASA
CHECKED BY.
ft ^ ^1w mA^yA
o.0
^eet Mountain Ave.
I
S 900 00' 00" E
4201q. R.
C$A 4
f umshed
coot. draw
U 1f
O
w
N 90' 00' 00" W
86.00'
Alley
16,540 5a. FT. LOT
Site Plan 11X17
1- = 20'-0"
o0 0
0
o o`
o rn
U)
N
}
i NOTE:
- Ridge Line = +25'-7 T/8" on Architectural Drawings
j = 5.062'-3 T/16" above sea level
- Upner Level = 11'-5 3/6" on Architectural Drawings
= 5048'-O 15/16" above sea level
- Main Level = 00'-0" on Architectural Drawings
= 5.036.64' above sea level
- T.O. Fnd. I = -0'-3 3/4" on Architectural Drawings
= 5.036-3 13/16" above sea level
- T.O. Fnd. II = -1'-5 5/4" on Architectural Drawings
I = 5.035'-1 13/16" above sea level
- Lower Level = -11'-1 3/4" on Architectural Drawings
= 5.025-5 13/16" above sea level
i
i
Turner Alley Garage
DAVIDHUETER 1401 West Mountain Ave.
)AVaCA'TCHUETERC31.1 Fort Collins , Colorado
970.567.4805 Date: 5-9-16
Rai~
am%-*M 1,
._i: a �. ��- ♦' _ �+
f;.
'y.��jy�fsiY—+ S�IfiI:. • Y ` '•t�•y�,
deep..
.dw
Ago
- i.. .. V. VI'J�f e'•
y
�AI•IAiO}f�lf.�...Silt. _;.•' .. - .
At
.. i
+r ,,.Nw
Va.
' n
4 �
may+ yy
jor
4�Vi L
L ATM f My Siste.r*Knits ;MEx -S
AL
ki
FEEDAGRAIN (o,
J6 SE LOVE NO
4F
�71
,-A A K
, p
"IrWI 4-
Jun 16 16 11:15a Turner 970-682-2406 p.2
compromise the visually pleasing neighborhood design, character, or
safety as evidence by the prevalence of them everywhere along
Mountain, even in the heavier used arterial section. It kind of defies
common sense that you would require us to remove a long standing,
safely used, small shared existing access (the same as hundreds all
along Mountain) and expose us to undo future hardship, major
additional expenses, and delays.
2. We are proposing to leave the flat roof portion of the home as
currently drawn to preserve the original intent of the design element
included in lieu of changing the design to a shed style roof. The 2/12
roof pitch works but it does compromise the simplicity of the design
by drawing one's eye to the lower roof more than the two prominent
10/12 roofs flanking the entry. With the 2/12 roof pitch you will be
seeing 2 roofing materials (metal and asphalt), which create a busier
and distracting elevation. The existing elevations have a
predominant gable end roofline (90%). The flat roof covered porch
would read the same as a 2/12 pitched roof from the road or sidewalk
as you are looking up riding by or standing. We believe the flat roof
portion of the porch is an integral design element of the overall style
of the home. Also attached are examples of the suggested 2/12 roof
design. It actually reads more contemporary than our original
"Wrightian" style.
Thank you for your consideration of both variances. The most important one to us
is the front driveway access for obvious reasons. We would love to work with you
to make this happen, such as collaborating on the driveway materials. The roofline
can be adjusted without the same hardship, costs and compromise. The requested
variances are not expected to pose any detriment to public health, safety, or welfare.
The Variance will not reduce the design life of any public improvements or increase
future City maintenance costs.
Please contact us with any questions.
Sincerely,
Mary Turne
r
970-215-2138 or dmktl@comcast.net
Jun 16 16 11:15a Turner 970-682-2406 p.1
Date: June 161h, 2016
Project: Turner Residence
1401 West Mountain Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Project #: 1514
Attn: Ali van Deutekom
City of Fort Collins Zoning Review
281 N. College Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80522
City of Fort Collins BDR Variance Request:
Dear Ali,
Thank you for meeting with its recently and explaining the next step in our home
approval process. This variance request is twofold. First variance request is to
maintain the original cut for an attached garage off collector roadway, Mountain
Avenue, and the second is to address the flat roof portion of the home design.
1. We are proposing to leave the existing access onto our lot from
Mountain Avenue in lieu of removal. One of our original reasons to
purchase this particular lot was because of the Mountain Avenue front
driveway cut. My husband has had 4 neck and back surgeries and
aging and staying in place is very important to us. Shoveling to a
garage almost 90 feet away when older is difficult if not dangerous
and presents an unnecessary hardship given the size of the lot and the
already existing cut which has been used safely without incident for
decades. In addition, we don't believe we can unilaterally impinge on
the neighbors right to access their property from the existing drive
and their prescriptive easement, see the attached photos. This
driveway has been used jointly for over 18 years. Keeping the access
will also avoid creating additional waste in tearing out something
existing and usable. This portion of Mountain Avenue is a fairly quiet
collector road, not arterial, and has had the existing access condition
in place since the original street was designed. There are numerous
other homes on Mountain Avenue on the same block with access from
the street and the alleyway. We have attached a map of the 1400
block showing how prevalent this front access is. We are open to
drive design options and materials (maybe grass in the center) to
preserve the overall look and aesthetic on Mountain. All trees and
landscaping would stay in place. Keeping this driveway does not