HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATERS' EDGE - PDP - PDP160006 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)03/02/2016: The Cover Sheet needs to inClude the landscape plan sheets in
the in SHEET INDEX.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
03/02/2016: At the time of DCP we will need the Landscape Bond in place.
standard is LOS D. The applicant's TIS calculates that the intersection of Vine
/ Lemay will be at a LOS F with the completion of Phase I of Waters Edge. This
triggers the APF threshold and is initially the most significant issue for the
development to address before being able to move forward.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
07/20/2016: A memo has been received that further reviews options at some of
these intersections, but much additional work is needed, no clear identification
of improvements has been made, and no design submitted.
03/02/2016: If and when the APF issue is addressed, then there are a number
of other off -site intersections that need further discussion, evaluation, and
potential mitigation. They include:
-Vine and Timberline. With completion of Phase I, this will be LOS F and not
meet LCUASS LOS criteria. The TIS notes the recommended improvement is
a signal or roundabout. The railroad tracks complicates this, and further review
will be required.
-Timberline and Mountain Vista. With completion of Phase I, this will be LOS
F and not meet LCUASS LOS criteria. The TIS notes the recommended
improvement is an all -way stop. Rural, arterial, high speed all -way stops can be
a compliance and safety concern. Further review of other options such as a
channelized T, or roundabout is appropriate.
-Turnberry and Country Club. With completion of Phase I, the TIS notes that
this intersection will be LOS F for the eastbound approach with an average
delay of more than 4 minutes. No recommended improvements are listed in the
TIS, perhaps because Country Club is technically classified as a collector. But
with almost 300 left turns in the PM peak hour, very poor level of service, and
increasing safety concerns, this intersection should be evaluated for a signal
warrant and reviewed for a roundabout.
-SH1 and Douglas Road. This intersection has a current safety concern, and
with completion of Phase 1, will see increasingly poor levels of service. This
intersection should be evaluated for a signal warrant (70% factor due to high
speed).
Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-68209 nhahn@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/19/2016
07/19/2016: Please see redlines for signing and striping comments.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
07/19/2016: The Plat still needs to be corrected.
03/02/2016: On the Plat and the site Plan Cover Sheet Please change the
planning signature block to Director of Community Development and
Neighborhood Services.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
07/19/2016: This still needs to be included
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated:
03/04/2016
07/20/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
03/04/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated:
03/04/2016
07/20/2016: This has not been completely corrected. See redlines.
03/04/2016: All Lots must be shown completely on at least one sheet. See
redlines.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated:
03/04/2016
07/20/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
03/04/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated:
07/20/2016
07/20/2016: There is a missing statement on sheet 1. "There shall be no
private .... of the City Code."
Comment Number: 40 Comment Originated:
07/20/2016
07/20/2016: Please change the dimensions along Midship Way. See redlines.
Comment Number: 41 Comment Originated:
07/20/2016
07/20/2016: Please label all right of way dedicated by the plat on all sheets.
See redlines.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 19
Comment Originated: 03/07/2016
07/20/2016: This is still incorrect. Sheet 5 has an incorrect title.
03/07/2016: Some of the titles in the sheet index do not match the titles on the
noted sheets. See redlines.
Comment Number: 20
07/20/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
03/07/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 22
07/20/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
03/07/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 24
07/20/2016: There are match line issues. See redlines.
03/07/2016: There are match line issues. See redlines.
Comment Originated: 03/07/2016
Comment Originated: 03/07/2016
Comment Originated: 03/07/2016
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970.221-6887, mwilkinsona()fcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
07/20/2016: This issue has not yet been resolved. There is a City Council
worksession planned for August 9th to discuss in general terms whether
refinement to the APF should be considered.
03/02/2016: Section 3.7.3.D in the City of Fort Collins City Code details the
requirements for Adequate Public Facilities regarding transportation. It
indicates that all development shall meet or exceed the transportation level of
services standards contained in Part II of the City of Fort Collins Multi -modal
Transportation Level of Service Manual. For a signalized intersection that
To mitigate the height of these retaining walls regarding safety and aesthetics,
the City requires that the walls be tiered to two or more walls with a landscaping
bench between each section.
This will reduce additional volume in detention basin 110, which will need to be
replaced in another location.
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 03/04/2016
07/20/2016: A letter from the ditch company needs to be provided
documenting that the release can be longer than the statute.
03/04/2016: Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602 (8) requires that all quantity
detention basins drain within a designated time. Detention basin 110 may not
meet this statute due to the restricted release rate of 1 cfs, which was required
by the owners of Larimer #8 Irrigation Canal.
This issue needs further investigation on what will be allowed if the existing
detention basin were to be modified or if the detention basin were to be left in
it's current condition.
The City suggests the involvement of the ditch company to help in facilitating a
solution.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty(cDfcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 43
07/20/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 44
07/20/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 33
07/20/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
03/07/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 36
07/20/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
03/08/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 42
07/20/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 45
07/20/2016: Please correct the sheet numbering.
Comment Originated: 07/20/2016
Comment Originated: 07/20/2016
Comment Originated: 03/07/2016
Comment Originated: 03/08/2016
Comment Originated: 07/20/2016
Comment Originated: 07/20/2016
Topic: Plat
07/19/2016: Repeat, no erosion control plan redlines from 2/22/2016 were
addressed along with still needing an erosion control report and escrow
calculation.
02/22/2016: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet
requirements. Please by FDP submit; Erosion Control Plan (Based upon the
redlines from 2-22-2016), Erosion Control Report (Based upon the current
drainage criteria), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (Based upon the BMPs
depicted in the erosion control plan). If you need clarification concerning the
erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse
Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamaraue(Mcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
07/20/2016: Repeat Comment.
03/02/2016: Please provide an update to the SWMM with the new
configuration of quantity detention. This will size the conveyance required to
transfer the lost volume in detention pond 110 to the property to the east.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
07/20/2016: Further documentation is needed to show the rest of the single
family piece of the development is meeting the LID requirements.
03/02/2016: This development is required to meet the current LID standards.
This includes 25% of the site's vehicular impervious area of multifamily portions
to be porous pavement as well as 50% of the overall site to drain into a LID
technique. Please document the development is meeting the requirement per
City standards.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
07/20/2016: Repeat Comment.
03/02/2016: The LID techniques will need to be constructed per City criteria
and per the City's standard details.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
07/20/2016: Reminder for Final Compliance.
03/02/2016: An off -site drainage easement is required for the conveyance and
quantity detention of flows on the property to the east of the site.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016
07/20/2016: The standards state that the walls should be 30-inches or less for
safety reasons.
03/02/2016: The development is required to meet the City's Detention Pond
Landscape Standards for all the ponds.
Due to detention pond 110 already being constructed, the standards would
apply to any alterations in grading and landscaping. Additional landscaping can
be used to help mitigate the existing lack of variation in pond grading.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016
07/20/2016: Per the Detention Pond Landscape Standards, the walls should
be 30-inches or less due to safety concerns.
03/04/2016: The retaining walls along the north and west sides of detention
basin 110 are near 12 feet high in certain places. Retaining walls of this height
create a safety hazard/concem as well as an aesthetic concern.
Topic: General
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/29/2016
02/29/2016: Will need additional details at final plan including landscape
details, mail kiosk locations (if large), trash enclosures, fencing, etc. Also note
information or details for the retaining walls.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/29/2016
02/29/2016: At Final, consider adding an architectural panel detail for meter
screening to have a more finished look than painting to match the fagade.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 07/20/2016
07/20/2016: Plans for any necessary off -site improvements and supporting
traffic study update must be reviewed and accepted by the City prior to
scheduling of the hearing.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 07/20/2016
07/20/2016: Please review and add the following notes to the site plan:
Maintenance of Common Elements:
A Homeowners Association other approved City entity shall be established for the development and shall
be responsible for the continued maintenance of all common elements. All open
space tracts, medians and round -a -bouts within Morningstar Way, Plank Lane,
and Midship Way, all private drives, community facilities, natural habitat buffers,
and oil well setback buffers shall be maintained by the homeowners
association.
Oil and Gas Buffer Requirements:
All existing oil and gas well head locations shall remain permanently plugged
and abandoned in accordance with the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation
Commission standards.
Prior to City authorization of any residential building permit in conjunction with
these Final Plans, all oil and gas well heads within the project limits shall be
permanently plugged and abandoned in accordance with COGCC regulations.
Upon completion of well plugging and reclamation and prior to City authorization
of any residential building permit, the Owner shall conduct a soil gas survey of
all oil and gas well head locations on the property and provide the City and the
COGCC with the results of the survey. Should the results of the survey indicate
that any well head is not properly plugged and abandoned in accordance with
COGCC standards, the Owner shall re -plug the well heads and provide further
documentation to the City and COGCC that the wells are properly plugged in
accordance with all COGCC regulations. Upon completion and COGCC initial
acceptance of on -site well plugging and reclamation, any continued
maintenance, repairs, alterations and/or well head monitoring shall be the
responsibility of the Homeowners Association or other approved City entity.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, Ischlam a()fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016
electrical service from L&P's transformer to the meter.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 07/19/2016
Contact Luke Unruh at Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the
transformer locations, please show the locations on the utility plans. Transformer
must be within 10' of an asphalt/concrete surface.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 07/19/2016
Please make sure the gas service is on the opposite side as the electric
service
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 07/19/2016
07/19/2016: If three phase electric facilities will be needed please specify the
locations and show them on the utility plans.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, Ilynxwileranpoudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 07/13/2016
07/13/2016: FIRE LANE SIGNS
Please adjust posting of fire lane signage as per redlines.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/13/2016
07/13/2016: EMERGENCY ACCESS
Fire access easements should be adjusted as follows:
> Portions of Tracts D & X will need to be included in the EAE to serve as fire
lanes for Lots 1-7 and Lots 263-279.
> Tracts L-1 & K-1 are not required to be dedicates as an EAE.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 07/13/2016
07/13/2016: LABELING (Pg. 32 of Water Plan)
Two hydrants have been relocated. The hydrant icons are correct but hydrant
text and arrow still point to old locations.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 07/13/2016
07/13/2016: TURNING RADII
Fire apparatus turning movements appear to be at risk in some portions of the
site where private drives intersect with public streets. A minimum inside turning
radius of 25' is required at all times. The applicant is asked to re-evaluate
turning radii for all private drives serving as a fire lane (EAE). Code language
provided below.
> IFC 503.2.4 and Local Amendments: The required turning radii of a fire
apparatus access road shall be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet
outside.
Comment Number: 11
Comment Originated: 07/13/2016
07/13/2016: LAKE & WATERFRONT ACCESS
Details of the emergency access plan for the waterfront are still being worked
out with the project team and are under consideration by the fire marshal.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Jason Holland, 970.224-6126, jholland aofcgov.com
early to mid -design stage for this meeting to be effective. Applicants of new
projects should email scarter@fcgov.com to schedule a pre -submittal meeting.
Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations
and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of
construction being proposed.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/26/2016
02/2612016: Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as
amended:
2012 International Building Code (IBC)
2012 International Residential Code (IRC)
2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado
2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the
fcgov.com/building web page to view them.
Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI Al17.1-2009.
Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.
Frost Depth: 30 inches.
Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B.
Seismic Design: Category B.
Climate Zone: Zone 5
Energy Code Use
1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC.
2. Multi -family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential
chapter.
3. Commercial and Multi -family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial
chapter.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 02/2612016
02126/2016: City of Fort Collins IBC amendments require a full NFPA-13
sprinkler system in multifamily units with an exception for buildings with up to 6
dwelling units that are not more than 2 stories nor more 5000 sqft per floor.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/26/2016
Building code and State statute CRS 9-5 requires project provide accessible
units. This project has 130 units (single family attached and multifamily
combined) and will need to achieve at least 60 points. A
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Luke Unruh, 9704162724, lunruh(Wfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 03/03/2016
03/03/2016: Please contact Luke Unruh at Utility - Light & Power Engineering if
you have any questions at 970-416-2724.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/19/2016
Please be aware that any dwelling greater than a duplex is considered
commercial. This means the developer is responsible for the installation of the
locations. Chanticleer has a more upright form and better disease resistance.
Use Chanticleer Pear in place of Spring Snow Crab in the few locations where
Spring Snow is used as a street tree. This is on sheet L28 and maybe a few
others.
Skymaster English Oak has been taken out of production. Substitute it with
another canopy street tree species. Evaluate using Boulevard American Linden
or American Sentry American Linden in place of Skymaster. Some use of both
of these lindends could be beneficial.
Use Shumard Oak for around half of the Texas Red Oak used as street trees.
They are very similar and this would add some diversity.
Evaluate if some Catalpa can also be used as Street Trees at appropriate
locations.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/09/2016
07/21 /2016:
Continued:
Thank you for contacting the City Forester for the on -site tree inspection. Please
now set the meeting with the City Forester to get tree inventory and mitigation
information before the next submittal. Included in the evaluation with be a
determination if any of the existing street trees along Brightwater Way are dying
or dead and will need to be replaced.
03/09/2016:
Will there be any existing trees impacted by the project. Clarify on the plans any
impact to trees along the shore. Contact the City Forester for an on -site meeting
to further evaluate and obtain any inventory and mitigation information.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 03/09/2016
07/21 /2016:
Continue:
Thank you for providing the information about the possible undergrounding of
the Xcel lines. Communicate final determination for undergrounding in next
response and also directly to the City Forester before final plan.
03/09/2016:
There are overhead electric utility lines along the west side of Tumberry north of
Brightwater. Will these lines be undergrounded? If they are to remain show their
location on the plans. Street trees placed under these lines will need to be
smaller ornamental trees. Crabapple trees such as Red Baron or Thunderchild,
the Japanese tree lilac or thornless cockspur hawthorn are smaller trees that
might work under the lines. There are some existing ash trees planted under the
lines just north of Brightwater that will need to be changed out. These ash trees
have never established and are small caliper. These ash need to be shown as
exiting and to remove and replace.
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Sarah Carter, 970.416.2748, scarter(&fc-gov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 02/26/2016
02/26/2016: Please schedule a pre -submittal meeting for this project.
Pre -Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the
design, that the new projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted
City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the
required to be protected with a 100-foot buffer compared to the amount of area
actually protected within the buffer.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(a)fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/09/2016
07/21 /2016:
Continued:
Thank you for adding the words stop sign in the legend. Although there does not
appear to be a symbol by the words stop sign in the legend? Please add a
symbol that is distinct in the legend and also add it on the landscape sheets at
locations of stop signs. Make the symbol large enough to be clearly identified.
Adjust position of any street trees at least 20 feet from stop sign locations.
03/09/2016:
Show actual locations of all stop signs with a distinct symbol and also identified
the stop sign symbol in a key.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/09/2016
07/21 /2016:
Continued:
Some requested street tree species changes have been made from the
previous comment. Items 1-3 listed below still need to be addressed.
Street tree selection comments:
1. Use Chanticleer Pear in place of Spring Snow Crab in the few locations
where Spring Snow is used as a street tree. This is on sheet L28 and maybe a
few others.
2. Skymaster English Oak has been taken out of production. Substitute it with
another canopy street tree species. Evaluate using Boulevard American Linden,
American Sentry American Linden or other suitable canopy shade tree in place
of Skymaster. Some use of both of these lindens could be beneficial. In addition
to Skymaster not being available English Oak was damaged in the fall 2014
freeze.
3. Brandywine Crabapple produces a large and has horizontal growth. It is used
in two places in the medians located in Morning Star Way on sheets L3 and
L14. Please change the Brandywine crabapples to Red Baron crabapple or
another ornamental with upright growth.
These street tree species adjustments have been made:
Has been changed : Use Chanticleer Pear in place of Autumn Blaze Pear in all
parkway and median locations. Chanticleer has a more upright form and better
disease resistance.
Has been changed: Use Shumard Oak for around half of the Texas Red Oak
used as street trees. They are very similar and this would add some diversity.
Has been changed. Evaluate if some Catalpa can also be used as Street Trees
at appropriate locations.
03/09/2016:
Street tree selection comments:
Use Chanticleer Pear in place of Autumn Blaze Pear in all parkway and median
03/01/2016: Landscape Plan Sheets L33 and L34. There is an area in the
Natural Habitat Buffer Zone labeled as turf, but it appears to be a path. Only
native plantings will be allowed within the buffer zone, so turf is not an allowable
material to use. Please update and/or clarify.
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/14/2016: Please update labels to read "Natural Habitat Buffer Zone." See
redlines.
03/01/2016: Landscape Plan Sheets L33, L34, L35. The Natural Habitat Buffer
Zone and edge of wetlands should be clearly delineated and labeled. It's hard to
tell where the boundaries are, and therefore whether the buffer standards are
being met.
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/14/2016: See redlines for clarification. The path is shown in the same
symbology as "turf' in the legend, and should be shown with a different type of
stipling or hatching.
03/0112016: Landscape Plan Sheet 36. What is the circular area shown as turf
within the buffer zone? Please clarify.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 07/14/2016
07/14/2016: In regard to LED light fixtures, The American Medical Association
(AMA) and International Dark -Sky Association (IDA) both recommend using
lighting that has a corrected color temperature (CCT) of no more than 3000
degrees Kelvin in order to limit the amount of blue light in the night environment.
Blue light brightens the night sky and creates more glare than any other color of
light. Both LED and metal halide fixtures contain large amounts of blue light in
their spectrum, and exposure to blue light at night has been shown to harm
human health and endanger wildlife.
Staff encourages the applicant to use the 3000K or 580nm versions of the LED
light fixtures that have been selected.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/14/2016: Thank you for clearly delineating the edge of the wetlands and
labeling the width of the buffer zone in multiple locations. I was not able to find a
table comparing the area required by a 100-ft buffer compared to the area
provided within the buffer zone. Please include this on the first sheet of the site
plan.
03/01/2016: The line delineating the edge of wetlands along Richards Lake is
not clear, and it is difficult to determine the width of the Natural Habitat Buffer
Zone in all locations. Please make sure the arrow is pointing to the correct line,
include the symbology in the legend, and/or label the dimensions for the buffer
zone. (See sheet 2 of the Site Plan, for example).
If the buffer from the wetlands is less than 100 feet in any location, a table will
need to be included on the site plan that calculates the amount of acreage
07/14/2016: Please provide photo or material samples for the retaining wall.
As currently, this material does not appear to be compatible with the ecological
character of the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone along Richard's Lake. Please use a
more natural stone material for the retaining wall.
03/01/2016: Landscape Plan Sheet L33. Please label and provide additional
detail for the retaining wall shown in the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone. What
material(s) will be used? To ensure that the retaining wall is compatible with the
natural character of the buffer zone, a naturalized retaining wall consisting of
boulders , stacked rock, or other natural materials would be more appropriate
than cement or something similar.
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/14/2016: There are still some sheets of the utility plans that need labels and
notes related to the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone. See redlines.
03/01/2016: The Natural Habitat Buffer zone and edge of wetlands need to be
delineated and labeled on all sheets of the site, grading, utility, and landscape
plans that include this area.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/14/2016: This still needs to be added to some sheets of the utility plans.
See redlines.
03/0112016: Please add an Environmental Planner signature to all utility plans
that show the buffer zone.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/14/2016: This is still missing from some sheets. See redlines. The two
notes can be combined into one note, if needed: "Please see Section 3.4.1 of
the Land Use Code for allowable uses within the buffer zone. The Natural
Habitat Buffer Zone is intended to be maintained in a native landscape."
03/01/2016: Please add the following statement to the notes on any sheets that
show the Habitat Buffer: Please see Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code for
allowable uses within the buffer zone. This is already included on some, but not
all, of the relevant sheets.
Comment Number: 4
07/14/2016: See comment 3 above.
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
03/01/2016: A note should be added to all sheets of the site, landscape, utility,
grading, and storm sewer plan that include the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone
noting that the natural habitat area is meant to be maintained in a native
landscape. This will help preserve the intention behind the buffer zones and the
natural features into the future.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 11
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/14/2016: See redlines for clarification. The path is shown in the same
symbology as "turn' in the legend, and should be shown with a different type of
stipling or hatching.
meets standards. I have an example of a recent report for your use.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/19/2016: A variance request will need to be made for the proposed design
of Longboat Way. This will need to be received by engineering, reviewed, and
addressed prior to hearing. 03/01/2016: LCUASS require that streets adjacent
to multi -family development are widened to a local collector cross-section. Fleet
Drive, Cruiser Lane, and Longboat Way shall be widened to the 36� roadway
(local collector) in order to meet this standard.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/19/2016: Five units take access off of Plank Lane, so 5 spaces should be
provided according to 7-23. 03/01/2016: Please demonstrate how the parking
requirement of Figure 7-23 is being satisfied for the Plank Lane eyebrow.
Current lane width in the Plank Lane eyebrow does not allow for any on -street
parking. If the width remains as is, no parking signs/striping will need to be
shown on the signing/striping plan.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/19/2016: Engineering will be looking to see this prior to plan approval.
03/01/2016: For the roundabout splitter islands: ADA requires that detectable
warnings are installed on the surface of the cut through on each side, located
6�-8� back from the street. If the cut through is <6� in length, the detectable
warnings cover the entire area.
Comment Number: 22
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/19/2016: Please update 1601, 1606, and 1607 to the most recent revisions.
Please remove the older and duplicate 1606(a). 03/01/2016: The following
drawings need to be updated: 803, 1601, 1602, 1606,1607, 1606(a), 1605,
710, 708.
Comment Number: 23
Comment Originated: 03/03/2016
07/19/2016: Engineering will need to see these letters prior to hearing.
03/02/2016: Letters of intent shall be submitted to the City for any offsite
easements prior to hearing.
Comment Number: 26
Comment Originated: 07/20/2016
07/20/2016: Please review intersection details, there are some very short
transitions, some low points, some inverted streets that don't seem correct. Why
is the cross slope being designed so close to the 3% maximum for new
streets?
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberaerMcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 24
Comment Originated: 03/04/2016
03/04/2016: The TDRF paperwork that was submitted identifies that there are
249 detached single family homes proposed on this site. Per the site plan 222
are proposed. If the site plan is correct then then the project is due a refund for
additional fees paid. We just need to clarify the number of units.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette(a)fcraov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
Fort Collins
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov. com/developmentreview
July 22, 2016
Terence Hoaglund
VIGNETTE STUDIOS
PO BOX 1889
Fort Collins, CO 80522
RE: Waters Edge, PDP160006, Round Number 2
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Project Planner, Jason Holland, at 970-224-6126orjholland@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Katie Sexton, 970-221-6501, ksexton(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07119/2016: Engineering will need to receive, review, and address these
variance requests prior to hearing. 03/01/2016: Variance request letters will
need to be submitted for each variance including variances that had been
previously approved. They will be reviewed and evaluated once received.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/19/2016: Engineering will need to receive, review, and address this variance
request letter prior to hearing. 03/01/2016: The current site layout does not
comply with the Land Use Code street spacing minimums in 3.6.3 D.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/19/2016: Engineering will need to see this exhibit prior to hearing.
03/01/2016: Please submit turning templates for left turns along Morningstar
Way east of the roundabout.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 03/01/2016
07/19/2016: Engineering will need to receive, review, and address this variance
request letter prior to hearing. 03/01/2016: Please submit a roundabout design
report. The roundabout design criteria have changed and we will need more
information before the roundabout can be approved to determine if design