The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLEGACY AUTO - PDP - PDP120001 - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)04/02/2013: You are including the portion of Hall Addition First Filing in the square footage that was dedicated as right of way at reception #20110016834. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04102/2013: Sheet PDP-CVR still has a title of Legacy Tractor. 02/08/2012: Please correct the project name on all sheets to Legacy Auto. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/02/2013: There are still line over text issues. 02/08/2012: There are line over text issues. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford(a)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/02/2013 04/02/2013: S&S Notes, Sht 2; please revise all occurances of the notes that state Local Entity Engineer to state Local Entity Traffic Engineer. Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Emma McArdle, 970-224-6197, emcardleaa�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/05/2013 04/05/2013. Please make sure the bus stop is located in a "transit easement" on your plat. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington CDfcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 04/02/2013: The water main will likely have to connect to the 4" main in College. Get field locates on ALL utilities along College south to the existing 4" water main ,and schedule a meeting to review prior to the next submittal. It may be heldpful to have PFA also attend the meeting. 02/07/2012: As noted at the November 22, 2010 conceptual review, this project will be responsible for extending the water main at the northeast corner of the site with the objective of connecting to one of the existing mains in the area. Schedule a meeting with Poudre Fire Authority and Water Utilities staff to review and discuss options. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 04/02/2013. There is no sewer in College; therefore, it is doubtful that the service extends east as shown. It is suggested that a dye test be done to confirm the point of connection. 02/07/2012: Show the sewer service to the existing building. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 04/02/2013: Add Standard Detail. 02/07/2012: Label sewer service clean -outs as traffic rated and add the standard detail. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/02/2013 04/02/2013: See redlined utility plans for other comments. Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 04/02/2013 04/02/2013: There is a line that is running through the truncated dome detail on sheet 8. Topic: General Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/02/2013: These plans were not resubmitted. 02/08/2012: There are line over text issues on the Architectural Details sheet. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/02/2013: Are the line over text issues on these plans going to take away from the readability? If so, please address the text issues. 02/08/2012: There are line over text issues. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 02/08/2012: The boundary closes. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/03/2013: This has not been changed. The subtitle must include "being a part of Hall Addition First Filing". 02/08/2012: Please add the additional text to the subtitle, as shown on sheet 1. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/02/2013: This has been addressed, but there are still issues with the square footages. 02/08/2012: Please add a total area to the ownership & subdvision statement. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/03/2013: Please add the easement information for the pending Stormwater easement at the northeast comer of the property. 02/08/2012: Please add easement descriptions to sheet 2. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/03/2013: This has not been added. 02/08/2012: Please label & define the R.O.W. dedicated by the Hall Addition plat. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 02/08/2012: If the pending Stormwater easement that we have shown on sheet 2 is recorded before this plat, it will need to be shown on the plat & recording information referenced. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 04/02/2013 04/02/2013: Please change "person" to "persons" in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 04/02/2013 04/02/2013: The symbol along the south boundary line, looks like it is covered over. If it is a new symbol, add a triangle symbol & description to the legend. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 04/02/2013 04/02/2013: The recording date shown on sheet 2 for Book 1413, Page 610 does not match the legal description or the Larimer County Clerk & Recorder's website. Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 04/02/2013 02/07/2012: A drainage easement is required for the existing storm sewer outfall which drains the mobile home park to the north. This storm sewer is located in the northeast part of the site. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: A drainage easement is required for the limits of the detention pond. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: Water quality is required per Volume 3 of the Urban Drainage Manual. This includes a certain water quality volume associated with the type of mitigation. Snouts by themselves do not meet the City's water quality requirements. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 02/08/2012: The drainage easements for the storm sewers need to be 20 feet unless it can be shown 15 feet will work using OSHA trenching quidelines. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 02/08/2012: Some freeboard is required for the detntion pond to safely direct the flows over the emergency spillway. One foot is the requirement. Six inches may work for this site if the flow depth of the emergency spillway is 3 inches. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 02/08/2012: In the text of the report, please address the 4 step process related to BMPs per Volume 3 of the Urban Drainage Manual. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/08/2013 04/08/2013: A drainage easement is required for the storm sewer outfalling the property to the north. It is located in the northeast portion of the site. The City will provide survey information on the exact location of the storm sewer. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty(a)fc4ov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 22 04/02/2013: These plans were not resubmitted. 02/08/2012: There are conflicting notes on sheet PDP-A4.1. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/02/2013: Both benchmarks listed have been destroyed by road construction, and have been replaced with new benchmarks. Sheet 2 still needs a second benchmark added. 02/08/2012: Please add a second benchmark to sheets 1 & 2. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/02/2013: There are still line over text isues on these sheets. 02/08/2012: There are line over text issues on sheets 3-5. Comment Number: 27 04/02/2013: This is still an issue. Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 02/08/2012: The profiles on sheet 6 could be easier to read, if the linework & text are brought in front of the profile gridlines. Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 04/02/2013 04/02/2013: Please change the index on sheet 1 to match the titles of sheets 4 & 5. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02/10/2012: Erosion Control Report: Please use City Ordinance 174, 2011, specifically, Volume 3, Chapter 7, Section 1.3.3 Titled "PDP Erosion Control Report and Drawings Submittal Requirements." To assure your supplying the correct information for you Erosion Control Report. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02/10/2012: Erosion Control Drawing (Plans): a) On your General Details Page (2 of 10) says on line #11 that BMPs cannot be removed except under the direction of a "Local Entity Engineer" who might this be? I believe you mean Local Erosion Control Inspector? Double check all the written details to assure you are talking about the correct person in the City. b) On the General Details Page (2 of 10) on #13 your sheet says 90 Days which for the city is 30 days. This also is confusing because your Details on the Erosion Control Sheet (7 of 10) says 30 days, make sure you clarify the 30 Days in all locations. c) VTC Details, Use larger Rock, 3-6" is better for a purpose of a tracking pad. Also if the tracking pad is to be truly 50ft long, you might want to try drawing the VTC to scale on the plans. Also on the detail it says to remove the soil at''/2 the filter depth, how do you measure a filter depth on a tracking pad? Also describe how to maintenance the tracking pads? If you simply mean stir the rocks and remove excess sediments, say that, you want to make this document pretty clear to the builder what is expected on site. d) Your drawings did not contain any of the sequence drawing as prescribed in the requirements. Look over ordinance 174 to help clarify. Please use City Ordinance 174, 2011, specifically, Volume 3, Chapter 7, Section 1.3.3 Titled "PDP Erosion Control Report and Drawings Submittal Requirements." To assure your supplying the correct information for you Erosion Control Drawings. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: The Development is required to detain half of College Avenue along the site's frontage. These flows need to be routed into the detention pond. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: The site needs to detain basin 4 as well. These flows should be able to be routed into the inlet near the southern boundary of the site. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: The designed flows that would leave the pond over the emergency spillway need to be analyzed and shown how they can pass through the properties to the south and west without inundating any structures to the nearest public right-of-way. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: The detention pond needs to meet the requirements in the City of Fort Collins Detention Pond Landscape Standards. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 Comment Number: 1 01/23/2012: No comments Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, Topic: General Comment Originated: 01/23/2012 970-416.28691 jlynxwiler(a)poudre-fire.org Comment Number: 2 04/03/2013: WATER SUPPLY Comment Originated: 04/03/2013 Hydrant spacing and flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENTS: Hydrants to provide 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter. 2006 International Fire Code 508.1 and Appendix B The location of the proposed building in Phase IV will exceed the allowable maximum distance to the nearest hydrant on College. Another hydrant will be required along the EAE on the east side of building IV. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/03/2013 04/03/2013: FDC Fire Department Connections shall be installed in accordance with NFPA standards. Fire department connections shall be located on the street side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access. The location of the FDC shall be approved by the fire department. 2006 International Fire Code 912.2 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/03/2013 04/03/2013: KEY BOXES REQUIRED Poudre Fire Authority requires at least one key box ("Knox Box") to be mounted in approved location(s) on every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler or fire alarm system. The top shall not be higher than 6 feet above finished floor. 2006 International Fire Code 506.1 and Poudre Fire Authority Bureau Policy 88-20 Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/03/2013 04/03/2013: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION New and existing buildings shall be plainly identified. Address numbers shall be visible from the street fronting the property, plainly visible, and posted with a minimum of six-inch numerals on a contrasting background. 2006 International Fire Code 505.1 Contact: Ron Gonzales, 970-416-2864, ronzales cDpoudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02/10/2012: Please, verify all turning radii are 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue(cDfcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Department: Internal Services Contact: Steve Olt, 970-221-6341, solt(o)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 02/08/2012, Helen Matson of the City's Real Estate Planning Department offered the following comments: a.The acquisition on North College Avenue has been finalized. The Warranty Deed was recorded at Reception #20110016834 in Larimer County. The property boundary should be moved westerly accordingly. b.The Stormwater Utility is planning a project in this area. Real Estate Planning will be contacting the "owner" to see if projects jive. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 02/08/2012: Russ Hovland of the Building Inspection Department is forwarding a letter to the Applicant that addresses: 1) a Building Permit Pre -Submittal Meeting; 2) Adopted codes that construction shall comply with, and, 3) Legacy Auto, project specific concerns. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224.6152, dmartineia fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/01/2012 03/25/2013: At least a basic design of the electric system needs to be coordinated with Light & Power Engineering to confirm that there are no conflicts and that the electric utility utility system can be installed. For example, it appears that it makes both electrical and economic sense to consolidate both buildings from one transformer. 02/01/2012: Electric development and system modification charges will apply. Please coordinate power requirements with Light & Power Engineering at (970)221-6700. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/25/2013 03/25/2013: At area light is shown just east of the transformer adjacent to the phase IV building. The east side of the transformer will be the front side which must have 8 feet of unobstructed clearance in front. The other 3 sides must have a minimum of 3 feet clearance. The size of the transformer cannot be confirmed without knowing the electric loads to be on each building. The most likely transformer will be 67' wide x 4'8" deep Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/25/2013 03/25/2013: A new 6" water main is shown near the N.E. corner of the site. This water main appears to be virtually on top of a F.O. line. My records show that this F.O. line belongs to the City Traffic Dept. Please verify with them that the water main location is acceptable. Also, there is a high voltage power line running N-S along College Ave. The water main must be a minimum of 10 feet from the power line. Department: Park Planning Contact: Craig Foreman, 970.221-6618, cforeman@fcgov.com Topic: General 6. In phase 2 a tree could be added in the lawn area just to the NW of the new building located at the center of the project. 7. Add tree protection notes found in 3.2.1 (G) 8. Add these landscape notes: • The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling, discing or other suitable method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per one thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area. • A permit must be obtained from the City forester before any trees or shrubs as noted on this plan are planted, pruned or removed on the public right-of-way. This includes zones between the sidewalk and curb, medians and other city property. This permit shall approve the location and species to be planted. Failure to obtain this permit may result in replacing or relocating trees and a hold on certificate of occupancy. • The developer shall contact the City Forester to inspect all street tree plantings at the completion of each phase of the development. All trees need to have been installed as shown on the landscape plan. Approval of street tree planting is required before final approval of each phase. Failure to obtain approval by the City Forester for street trees in a phase shall result in a hold on certificate of occupancy for future phases of the development. 9. The existing tree on the north edge of the property is a multi -stem Siberian Elm. This species is exempt from the tree retention requirements in 3.2.1. (F) The applicant has retained the tree in the design at their discretion. The tree has several years of maturity. The City Forester recommends that the applicant obtain additional information on the tree by having a private certified arborist evaluate the elm. This individual could provide information on the trees condition as it relates to suitability for retention, and identify needs for pruning, protection or other treatments that could improve its structure, function and survivability. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/04/2013 04/04/2013: : Change the Spring Snow Crabs used as street trees to Chanticleer Pear to match the design theme in this section of the North College Corridor. The Forestry Divisions observations are that Princess Kay Plum does not typically survive for a very long period of time. Using a flowering crabapple such as Radiant or another cultivar in its place would add much better durability as a landscape tree. Department: Historical Preservation Contact: Josh Weinberg, 970-221.6206, iweinbergOfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 Building not yet 50 years old, so there is no historic preservation review. selecting plant materials within the buffer zone, but neither the Austrian Pine nor the Colorado Blue Spruce are listed in that document. However, I am fine with these species being utilized, but additional deciduous trees need also be provided, e.g., cottonwoods, plum, and chokecherry. The four -wing saltbrush is a good addition, but other shrubs should also be provided for increased diversity, e.g., rabbitbrush, serviceberry, and sand cherry, as examples. Additional red -osier dogwood would also work. 01/27/2012: Within the 50' buffer zone, according to Article 3.4.1(E)(1)(g), the City has the ability to determine if the existing landscaping within the buffer zone is incompatible with the purposes of the buffer zone. The landscaping in the buffer zone, as currently proposed, in insufficient to meet the standards of 3.4.1. For instance, the trees proposed within the buffer area (only three) are lacking both in quantity (we want more trees and shrubs throughout the entire site) and quality (the proposed trees are not native, please see the City's Native Plants Guide available at http://www.fcgov.com/naturalareas/native-plants.php for a more appropriate plant palette). Staff would be happy to meet with you to discuss these issues in more detail. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/27/2012 04/01/2013: 1 will need the revised lighting plan before this project can go to hearing. 01/27/2012: With respect to lighting, the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code, in Article 3.2.4(D) (6) requires that "natural areas and natural features shall be protected from light spillage from off -site sources." Thus, lighting from the parking areas or other site amenities shall not spill over to the buffer areas. The lighting plan must not allow for any foot candle spilllage into the buffer zone, in addition to addressing zoning's comments below. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: Legacy Auto Forestry Comments 2-7-12 1. Additional trees may be required between parking areas and the street. Review Parking lot Perimeter Landscaping standards 3.2.1 (E) (4) (a) (b) and how they may be applied to this project with the Project Planner. 2. Ohio buckeye is not well adapted to areas that are in parking lot islands or low water use areas. It is prone to leaf scorch in hot dry sites. Bur oak or Catalpa are good drought tolerant trees for these situations. 3. Douglas fir does not do as well as Austrian Pine or Blue Spruce on most Fort Collins sites. The latter two are more reliable over time as landscape trees. 4. Conifer trees need to be specified as 6 foot height B&B. Shrubs need to be specified as 5 gallon. 5. Check trees species numbers for Minimum Species Diversity 3.2.1 (3) Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/02/2013: While it's realized that the metal sidewalk culvert is not being built with this specific development, to the extent that the construction drawings have the detail, the detail should be modified to the specification we're currently using. 02/08/2012: The metal sidewalk culvert detail if intended to be built with a phase in the development has since been updated and should be modified as attached. Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/02/2013: I've had further discussion with Engineering, Traffic, and PFA on the emergency access design for the project. PFA indicated that need for there may no longer be a need for the emergency access onto College Avenue. If this is the case, the drive approach should be removed and replaced with vertical curb and gutter closing off the driveway. Should the emergency access remain, the drive approach should ideally be converted to rollover curb in order to reduce the appearance of the access being used by the general public. The bollards should be offset 2 feet from the property line onto private property to reduce the likelihood of bicyclists and pedestrians conflicting with the bollards while utilizing the sidewalk. 02/0812012: The use of bollards to block the emergency access should be verified for acceptability by PFA. If acceptable to PFA, the placement of the bollards should be outside of public right-of-way, behind the sidewalk on private property. Comment Number: 12 04/02/2013: Carried over for reference. Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 02/08/2012: Matt Baker in Engineering Street Oversizing has provided the information that the repay due for College Avenue improvements is currently $190,935.83. This amount is based on today's dollars and would be adjusted with inflation at the time of repayment which would be prior to issuance of a building permit. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/02/2013 04/02/2013: Project from my perspective is ready for a public hearing. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex ct fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/27/2012 04/01/2013: The landscape plan notes says "15' buffer" instead of 50'. The buffer zone needs to be labeled on the utility plans as well, and the Limits of Development includes the planting area - please correct. 01/27/2012: The following notes/graphics will need to be added to the utility plan: 1. Please indicate the "limits of development" line, as per Section 3.4.1(N)(1) of the Land Use Code. 2. Please add the following note to the utility, site and landscape plans "See Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within the buffer zone" 3. Please add an Environmental Planner signature to the signature blocks on the utility plans. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/27/2012 04/01/2013: The applicants have indicated that they used the Fort Collins Native Plant Guide for the Decorative Paved Display Spaces along North College Avenue to satisfy Sections 3.2.1(E) (4)(a) & (b), under Parking Lot Perimeter Landscaping, of the Land Use Code. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 04/01/2013: Please provide the corresponding calculations of parking area and interior landscaping square footage. 02/07/2012: Please provide a graphic showing how Section 3.2.1(E)(5) Parking Lot Interior Landscaping in the Land Use Code is being satisfied. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: In accordance with Section 3.2.1(1)(4) Installation of the Land Use Code, please add a note to the Planting Notes on the Landscape Plan (Sheet PDP-C3.2) regarding timing for installation of landscaping per phase of development. Please see red -lined Landscape Plan, Sheet PDP-C3.2. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: On the Lighting Photometric Plans, please bring the lineweights and spot values up in intensity so as to make them legible. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 02/06/2012: The Planning Objectives indicate 36 vehicle display spaces. Sheets PDP-C1.1A and PDP-C1.1 B of the plan set show 33 & 34 spaces, respectively. Please identify the other 2 or 3 spaces. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 02/06/2012: There is so much line work on the 2 Site Plans and it makes it very difficult to read them. The utilities, curve radii, existing landscaping & notes, and possibly contours may be eliminated from these plans. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 02/06/2012: There is a lot of "line over" information on the Site Plans that must be eliminated. This makes certain areas of the plan illegible. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 02106/2012: Is the pond in the southwest corner of the site really a "retention" pond, not a detention pond? Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 02/06/2012. There are 2 described lines (metes & bounds) on the Site & Landscape Plans that are not shown on the Subdivision Plat. What are they for? Please see red -lined Site Plans. Apparently they are not needed on the plans and should be removed to help clarify the plans. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970.221-6567, mvirataiaftgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/08/2012 04/02/2013: Add 40-97 after "Benchmark" to the second project benchmark. 02/0812012. A second project benchmark is needed to be referenced in the construction plan set. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 02/06/2012: Please better define "urban tractors" in the Description of Rationale in the Planning Objectives. Department: Current Planning Contact: Steve Olt, 970-221-6341, solt(&fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 04/01/2013: A modification of this standard is required. 02/07/2012: As set forth in Section 4.22(B)(2)(d)l & 5 of the CS, Service Commercial District, warehouses and wholesale distribution facilities must be located at least 200' from North College Avenue. Just in case the property owner(s) were to want to include these uses on the development plan please take note that none of the buildings are to be at least 200' from the street. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 02/09/2012 02/09/2012: Please see red -lined Site & Landscape Plans and Subdivision Plat for Current Planning comments. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 02/09/2012 02/09/2012: Please take "PDP" out of the sheet title on all plans (see red -lined plans). Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 02/09/2012 02/09/2012: At least one more round of development review is necessary before this proposal can be scheduled for an Administrative Public Hearing. Please see the Revision Routing Sheet prepared by staff for the number of copies of each document to submit for a second round of review. Contact the Development Review Center, at 970-416-2740, to schedule an appointment for your re -submittal, when ready. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 02/09/2012 02/09/2012: The development plans label the ditch along the north side of the property as the Weld & Larimer Canal. Shouldn't the name be Larimer & Weld Canal? Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 02/09/2012 02/09/2012: Please return all red -lined plans and documents wit your re -submittal. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: The Landscape Plans satisfy Section 3.2.1(D)(3) Minimum Species Diversity of the Land Use Code. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: One additional ornamental tree should be placed in the parkway just north of the south driveway entrance to the site (see red -lined Landscape Plan Sheet PDP-C3.1A). This will help satisfy Section 3.2. 1 (D)(2)(a) of the Land Use Code. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/07/2012 02/07/2012: Trees and shrubs are needed in the 15'-0" Landscape Buffers on the east sides of Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970,224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview April 09, 2013 Don Shields WG Architects P.O. Box 270788 Fort Collins, CO 80527 RE: Legacy Auto, PDP120001, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Seth Lorson, at 970-224-6189 or slorson@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Seth Lorson, 970-224-6189, slorson a()fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 04/01/2013 04/01/2013: Please provide building elevations for all sides of all building for all phases. Topic: General Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 04/01/2013 04/01/2013: This plan shows phasing. Phasing can only be established with an Overall Development Plan (ODP) which will require PDPs for each phase. The phasing shown in this current proposal will all have to be completed in the 3 years that the PDP is active. Please see LUC 2.2.11(B) & (C). Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 04/01/2013 04/01/2013: The proposed building are required to be built to the build -to line along adjoining streets per 3.5.3(B)(2). Or, alternative and exceptions may be considered per 3.5.3(B)(2)(d). Or, a modification of standard is needed. Contact: Steve Olt, 970-221.6341, solt(&fcgov.com