Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutED CARROLL MOTORS LOT EXPANSION - PDP - 5-98A - CORRESPONDENCE -121 No water services are permitted beyond the last fire hydrant (including irrigation services). Place the proposed irrigation service a minimum of five feet (5') before the existing fire hydrant. 122 Provide the standard fire hydrant, thrust block and water service details on the detail sheet. See the site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. fours ruly, T OY ONE Clty anner Page 4 9/12/2: Provide a temporary construction easement for tieing into the stormline that's in the adjacent property owner's lot. 12/18/02: The temporary construction easement provided with the last submittal is being returned. Please resubmit with the appropriate exhibits and signatures. Also, the legal description does not close and may not be described correctly. Please provide an additional temporary construction easement for the newly proposed retaining wall on the north side of the property. 35 3/20/2: Contact Bob Zakely at 224-6063 for drainage and erosion control notes. 12/19/02: Drainage and erosion control notes are specific to the project and determined by Bob Zakely. Please contact him at the above number. 112 Line 48 of the General Notes needs to be more specific. The variance for the separation distance must include the distance the code required and the actual distance granted by the variance. The variance for the detached/attached sidewalk needs to state the actual widths, code vs variance. This is so that anybody looking at the plans 10 years from now will know exactly what the variance was granted for without having to research the actual documents themselves (which may or may not be stored in the same building). 113 Index - Remove the word "Subdivision" from the Plat. 117 Provide more information on the newly proposed retaining wall along the north property line (height, width, footings, etc). Department: Stormwater Utility Topic: Drainage Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque 60 3/25/02 Please provide the finish floor elevation for the building east of the site and show that the building would not be inundated in a spill situation from the pond. 9/17/02 Repeat Comment. 1/3/03 - After a field visit, water that overtops the drive on the south end of the site could inundate the building to the east. The driveway to the north should act as the spillway for the pond only, and not the south driveway. Please increase the grade along the south drive so in a spill situation all of the water will be directed along the north side of the building to the east. 104 Please see comment on grading plan regarding sidewalk in detention pond. Repeat 1/3/03 Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Site 119 . Install a directional access ramp on the south side of the McCleland drive aisle to align with the directional ramps on the north side. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: Utility 120 Blow -offs are not permitted within the City of Fort Collins utilities service area. Provide a fire hydrant at the end of the abandoned line. Provide a utility easement for the required fire hydrant. Page 3 Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General 49 3/20/2: Provide a detached sidewalk, additional ROW and 15' utility easements along McClelland. Exact ROW requirements are to be determined in a meeting this Friday. Contact myself at 221-6605 or Tom Reif in Transportation Planning 416-2040. 9/12/2: Research by the city staff has shown that the this particular lot has already dedicated 50' of ROW in 1978 with the McClelland Special Improvement District. The additional 28' of ROW required to improve McClelland to a minor arterial will be purchased by the city at a later date. However, the project will need to continue to keep those future improvements in mind when designing the site as they have been. Just a few things that need to be coordinated on the plan sets, however. The plat is currently showing the 50' ROW but the utility plans are showing only 40'. The Site/Landscape plans call out 50' but do not scale out as 50'. All plan sets will need to be coordinated to show the correct ROW, as well as the existing RR and Ditch Co. ROW and/or easements. The project will still be required to dedicate a 15' utility easement from the back of walk. The project would need to submit a variance request to install attached 8' sidewalks to match the existing attached walks and Engineering would be favorable to granting that request. A Public Access Easement would need to be dedicated on the plat and shown on the plans sets for the area that the sidewalk extends past the existing ROW. This project must also provide the temporary construction easement to do the off -site work on the storm line. Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions. 12/18/02: The variance request was returned by fax for more information on 12/10/02. Please resubmit the variance request in accordance with 1.9.4 of LCLIASS. Topic: Plat 9 3/20/2: Clearly define all existing and proposed easements and ROW. 9/12/2: Show and dimension the exisiting RR and Ditch ROW and/or easement. Show all off site drainage and utility easements to the north and provide the reception numbers. Provide a Public Access Easement for the area that the attached sidewalk extends over the existing ROW. Need to coordinate the various plan sets to present the same information. 12/18/02: Change "Pedestrian Easement" to "Public Access Easement" as requested above. 118 From Technical Services: What are the dashed lines in the vicinity map? Topic: Site/Landscape 43 3/20/2: See redlines for spelling error in the crosswalk label and correction to the Property Description, Attorney's Certificate and the Planning & Zoning Approval certificate. See attached. 9/12/2: Repeat 114 The Project ID Sign can not be located within the 15' utility easement. 115 Show the temporary construction easement for the newly proposed retaining wall on the north side of the property. 116 Change the "Pedestrian" Access Easement to "Public" Access easement. Topic: Utility 30 3/20/2: All offsite improvements require an easement. All offsite grading requires a temporary construction easement. Page 2 �,� STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins JIM SELL DESIGN, INC. Date: 01/08/2003 C/O BRAD SAUCERMAN 153 WEST MOUNTAIN AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for ED CARROLL MOTORS LOT EXPANSION PDP, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Troy Jones Topic: General 105 1/8/03 Three light poles need to be moved away from trees. See the redlined landscape plan from Current Planning. 9/25/02 Several of the proposed light poles are shown between 10 and 12 feet away from proposed trees required within landscape islands. This sets up a potential problem for the trees in the future in that when they mature, they will block the light from the pole, and Ed Carrol Motors will be put in a situation where they will have to choose between the tree or the functionallity of the light. Although cutting down the tree in the future to avoid this conflict would not be allowed by the city, and would put the site in a zoning violation, it would be difficult for the city to enforce. The tree/light pole configuration needs to be slightly modified in such a way as to distance the light poles from the trees so that this problem doesn't arise. Although we applaud the use of as many trees as possible, it may be appropriate, when a pole and tree share a landscape island, to reduce the number of trees on that landscape island to one. If the tree is on the far eastern side of the island and the light pole on the far west, or vice -versa, the problem maybe solved. Section 3.2.1(E)(5)(c) of the land use code only requires one tree per landscape island. 110 1/7/03 The submittal is still missing clarification on which fixtures the light shields are being used. This needs to be clarified. 9/25/02 This submittal didn't include specifications for the lighting fixtures. This needs to be submitted so that it is clear what fixtures the approval is for, and so that any inspection of the site after construction can check to see whether the approval has been satisfied. Include specification sheets of the proposed fixtures, and elevations of the proposed poles, and clarify where and on which fixtures the light shields are being used. 123 Although there are several outstanding issues (based on this comment letter), the project has been scheduled for a type 1 hearing. All outstanding issues must be resolved prior to recording of the final compliance approval. The hearing is set for 4:30 P.M. on Thursday January 23, 2003 at 281 North College Avenue, Fort Collins in conference room A. This hearing date is conditioned upon off -site easements being obtained prior to the hearing. If the easements are not obtained prior to the hearing will have to be rescheduled. Susan Joy can clarify which easments are needed. Topic: Site/Landscape 72 1/7/03 Take out reference on the drawing to the existing curb cut from the site and landscape plans. 3/25/02 There are too many confusing lines on the drawing along McClelland. It is very hard to make out where the sidewalk is. If the existing curb cut is to be removed, don't show any reference to it on the proposed plans. Adjust the line weights so the drawing is less confusing. Why are there so many lines crossing the new proposed curb cut? What do they mean? Page 1