HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAJESTIC ESTATES ANNEXATION & ZONING - ANX160003 - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPlanning & Zoning Board
June 9, 2016
Page 6
Member Hobbs asked about the exclusion of property in the southwest comer, and Mr. Merrick explained
the history of this property and the fact that the LDS Church would be retaining that southwest comer in
perpetuity, which was a stipulation by the former owner upon the sale of the property.
Planner Lorson stated that this annexation meets the LUC standards, is within the Growth Management
Area, and is consistent with the City Structure Plan. There is also an agreement with the County
regarding access to Rock Castle Lane. Vice Chair Hart asked about the resolution approval by Council,
and Planner Lorson responded affirmatively.
Public Input
Linda Archer, 6439 Garrison Court, has a concern about the potential implications of this annexation,
including City costs, tax implications, or other issues. She feels that there are too many building and
zoning exceptions and variations currently being allowed.
John Siegmund, 6860 Silver Mist Lane, is concerned because he is unsure whether Rock Castle Lane
will remain private, so he is seeking assurance that it won't become a public road or lead to the future
annexation of his property_
Staff Response and Board Questions
Planner Lorson responded how areas are identified for annexation as a result of long-term planning and
the inter -governmental agreement with the County. Rock Castle Lane will remain under private
ownership and hasn't been identified as a future connection. There was more discussion regarding
access and signage to the subject parcel. Planner Lorson also confirmed that future owners of this area
will be subject to the same fees and property taxes as surrounding areas. He also explained the City's
philosophy that development will "pay its own way", including street oversizing fees, sidewalks, traffic
improvements, street lights, and any other public infrastructure, which is provided by private development
and then adopted by the COFC. He also confirmed that property to the south and east could also be
annexed in the future.
Board Deliberation
Vice Chair Hart made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend approval to the
City Council for the Majestic Place Annexation and requested zoning of U-E Urban Estate based
on the findings of fact on page 3 of the staff report. Member Heinz seconded the motion.
Vote: 7:0.
Other Business
None noted.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:08pm.
a ®rem-,-� mrAej
�
P!01h�incg Director
istin KirkoAtri6k, Chair
Planning 8 Zoning Board
June 9, 2016
Page 5
on stationary vendors. Member Schneider agrees that Downtown district should not be restricted; he
supports standards for public facilities and attention to conformance with code. Chair Kirkpatrick agreed
that the minor amendment process is important; however, she does agree that the Downtown district
should be restricted and doesn't feel she can support this proposal.
There was some discussion as to the best way to give positive feedback to the City Council. Assistant
City Attorney Yatabe recommended that the P&Z Board make a motion with specific recommendations to
be adopted by Council. Overall, the Board is in favor of requiring a property owner that wants to have a
stationary vending operation as an accessory use to their property to go through the minor amendment
process, regardless of the district or location. They also support the development of a definition of
"mobile vending" versus "stationary vending". There was more discussion about the best way to convey
the sections of the proposal that they are in favor of; there was also discussion regarding the next steps
after this hearing is complete.
Member Hobbs made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to City Council
that they do not approve this ordinance, and that they would support the establishment of a
definition between "mobile" and "stationary" vendors and the requirement for landowners to
apply for minor modifications to house "stationary" vendors. Member Carpenter added an
amendment to recommend "only approve". Member Carpenter seconded. Vote: 7:0.
Chair Kirkpatrick and several other Board members commended Staff on their diligence in researching
the issues and preparing a comprehensive proposal for the Board's review.
At 7:38pm, the Board took a short break, they reconvened at 7:44pm.
Project: Majestic Place Annexation and Zoning
Project Description: The purpose of this item is to annex and zone the Majestic Place property. The
applicant, Suburban Land Reserve Inc. c/o Mr. Kenneth Merritt, has submitted a written petition
requesting annexation of 19.93 acres located at 2150 Rock Castle Lane (southeast of Timberline Road
and Trilby Road) which is presently vacant. The requested zoning for this annexation is Urban Estate, U-
E. In accordance with the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Fort Collins Growth Management Area
with Larimer County, the City of Fort Collins agrees to annex land that meets the minimum contiguity
requirement, and based on a voluntary petition to annex for the purpose of redeveloping the subject
parcel.
Recommendation: Approval
Staff and Applicant Presentations
Planner Lorson provided an overview of the project, which is a 100% voluntary annexation into Fort
Collins. He discussed the zoning and the association with existing municipal boundaries of Fort Collins.
It is planned to be annexed on August 16"' with City Council. Ken Merritt, with JR Engineering
representing the applicant, Suburban Land Reserve, gave an overview of the project as well, illustrating
the project with maps and showing the land boundaries and surrounding areas with respect to the City's
City and Structure Plan.
Planning & Zoning Board
June 9, 2016
Page 2
Planning Director Gloss reviewed the items on the Consent and Discussion agendas for the audience,
noting that 2 items have been postponed to the July hearing (Oakridge Crossing Project Development
Plan, PDP160009, and the Harmony 23 Modification of Standard).
Public Input on Items Not on the Hearing Agenda:
None noted.
Consent Agenda:
1. Draft Minutes from May 12, 2016, P&Z Hearing
2. Arrowhead Cottages
3. Majestic Place Annexation and Zoning
4. CSU Whitcomb Streetscape Improvements Site Plan Advisory Review — SPA 160001
Public Input on Consent Agenda:
None noted.
A citizen requested that the Majestic Place Annexation and Zoning project be pulled from the Consent
agenda and a full presentation be made. Chair Kirkpatrick agreed, stating that this ftem would be moved
to the last item on the Discussion agenda.
Member Hart made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Board approve the June 9, 2016,
Consent agenda, with the exception of the Majestic Place Annexation and Zoning project
Member Heinz seconded the motion. Vote: 7:0.
Member Hart made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Board continue the Oakridge Crossing
PDP 160009 and the Harmony 23 Modification of Standard to the July 14, 2016, hearing. Member
Hansen seconded the motion. Vote: 7:0.
Discussion Agenda:
5. Oakridge Crossing Project Development Plan, PDP160009 - continued to the July 14, 2016,
hearing
6. Harmony 23 Modification of Standard — continued to the July 14, 2016, hearing
7. Revisions and Additions to the Land Use Code for Outdoor Vendor Requirements
Project: Revisions and Additions to the Land Use Code for Outdoor Vendor Requirements
Project Description: This is a request for a Recommendation to City Council regarding an update to
the City Land Use Code for outdoor vendor requirements. The project includes proposed changes for
outdoor vendor mobility options, land use review process for types of vending operations, and potential
separation requirement between vendors operating near existing restaurants. Note the project also
includes revisions to Chapter 15 of the City Code for reference.
Kristin Kirkpatrick, Chair
Gerald Hart, Vice Chair
Jennifer Carpenter
Jeff Hansen
Emily Heinz
Michael Hobbs
Jeffrey Schneider
City Council Chambers
City Hall West
300 Laporte Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado
Cablecast on FCTV Channel 14 &
Channel 881 on Comcast
The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will
make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance.
Regular Hearing
June 9, 2016
Vice Chair Kirkpatrick called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Roll Call: Kirkpatrick, Carpenter, Hansen, Hart, Heinz, Hobbs and Schneider
Absent: None
Staff Present: Gloss, Yatabe, Mapes, Wray, Beals, Branson, Lorson, Mounce, Langenberger,
Sexton, Kleer, Hahn and Cosmas
Agenda Review
Chair Kirkpatrick provided background on the board's role and what the audience could expect as to the
order of business. She described the following procedures:
• While the City staff provides comprehensive information about each project under consideration,
citizen input is valued and appreciated.
• The Board is here to listen to citizen comments. Each citizen may address the Board once for
each item.
• Decisions on development projects are based on judgment of compliance or non-compliance with
city Land Use Code.
• Should a citizen wish to address the Board on items other than what is on the agenda, time will
be allowed for that as well.
• This is a legal hearing, and the Chair will moderate for the usual civility and fairness to ensure
that everyone who wishes to speak can be heard.