The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEAST RIDGE 2ND FILING - FDP - FDP160006 - CORRESPONDENCE -Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 04/21/2016 04/21/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinsonCa7fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/22/2016 04/22/2016: The signing and striping needs a little review and refinement. Please see the handout with the typical striping approach, make changes, and we can review electronically. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolsonCaDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 03/01/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell(cDfcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: Second Request, the response to this comment is not adequate as it looks like with the concrete encasement dimensions, there may be no separation. 03/01/2016: Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profiles: where separation between storm and sewer crossings are less than 18�, please provide the actual separation distance on the profile and ensure that the lower utility is concrete encased or steel pipe encased. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: Second Request, we will not accept new or different information at mylar stage. The requested information needs to be provided prior to approval of the plans. 03/01/2016: Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profiles: Include storm crossing info on sheet SS06. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: See plan set redlines for other minor comments. 03/01/2016: See plan set redlines for other minor comments. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbealsWcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 03/02/2016: At the time a DCP is issued we need a Landscape financial guarantee in place. Page 14 of 14 Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountyWcaov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/19/2016: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. 03/02/2016: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/20/2016: This has not been corrected. 03/02/2016: The "Future Timberline Road Alignment" and/or "Future Utility Easement' notes need to include "Approximate". These lines are not necessarily fixed, based on the City Engineering design. They could move. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/19/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 03/02/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/19/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. 03/02/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/19/2016: There are match line issues. See redlines. 03/02/2016: There are match line issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 03/03/2016 04/19/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. 03/03/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 04/19/2016: Please change "RD16" on sheet SD15 to "SD16". Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 04/21/2016 04/21/2016: Please correct the sheet index, so it matches the sheet order. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/29/2016 04/21/2016: Please make corrections as marked, and add recording information. See redlines. 02/29/2016: Please add a Road Right Of Way Vacation Note as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/29/2016 04/21/2016: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate document, must be added prior to producing mylars. 02/29/2016: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate document, must be added prior to producing mylars. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 04/21/2016 04/21/2016: Are there any Lienholders for this property? If so, please add a signature block. If not, please add a note stating there are none, and include response in written comments. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 04/21/2016 04/21/2016: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at jcounty@fcgov.com Page 13 of 14 Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: 1 would suggest including a label that directs the contractor to "See Note 13" to make it very clear. 03/01/2016: Storm Drain Plan and Profiles: Please don6t place manholes in driveway entries or crosspans. There are two shown on sheet SD03 and another one on SD04. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: A response was not provided for this comment. In regards to FPO4, the manhole is fine as -is. Platforms within the manhole are not necessary. 03/01/2016: Storm Drain Plan and Profiles: On sheet SD20 that shows the ultimate outfall pipe location, can the alignment shift north or south a little so as to not place the stormline in the deepest part of the berm? Please extend the ultimate outfall pipe all the way to the ROW. Please eliminate manhole FPO-4. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: Second Request, we will not accept new or different information at mylar stage. The requested information needs to be provided prior to approval of the plans. 03/01/2016: Detail Sheets: The EDB outlet structures need to be shown in the plans too. Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: See Plan set redlines for other minor comments. 03/01/2016: See Plan set redlines for other minor comments. Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: The allowable release rate and the actual (ultimate) release rate still needs to be addressed in the report. Since this sites ultimate outfall is into the Dry Creek Basin, the maximum release rate allowed is 0.20 cfs/acre. However, if you decide to release less than that, you need to discuss why and provide orifice calculations to show how you are restricting the flow. 03/0112016: Drainage Report: What is the 2-yr historic release rate through the ultimate outfall pipe? How did you size this pipe? Comment Number: 42 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: Drainage Report: See Drainage Report redlines for other minor comments. 03/01/2016: Drainage Report: See Drainage Report redlines for other minor comments. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischlam(a�fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 04/15/2016: Erosion Control Plans had some redlines based upon changes, Erosion Control Report only had changes in the erosion control escrow calculation. All these few remaining redlines can be verified digitally to reduce wasting so much paper. 02/22/2016: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan (Based upon the redlines from 2-22-2016), Erosion Control Report (Based upon the redlines from 2-22-2016), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (Based upon the BMPs depicted in the erosion control plan). If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Page 12 of 14 Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: EMERGENCY ACCESS > Tracts EE & FF are currently labeled on the most recent Plat as Emergency Access Easements. These tracts are no required to be dedicated as fire lanes. > The required fire lane on the south side of the wetlands area is labeled as an Access Easement on the plat and not as an Emergency Access Easement as required. > The EAE connection to Zeppelin Way has not been indicated and rollover curb connections, not vertical are allowed. > Construction details for the Fire Lane south of the wetland and at the NW corner, between Barnstormer and Timberline do not appear to have been indicated. Compacted road base, engineered to support 40 tons, is acceptable. Other proposed materials need to be approved by the fire marshal. > The HOA and DA agreement shall show that maintenance and snow removal have been planned for and will be provided for throughout all portions of all fire lanes as needed. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/22/2016 04/2212016: UTILITY PLANS Note 14 on the Utility Plan only pertains to the out of access residential condition at the NE corner of the development along or adjacent to Barnstormer St. Future connectivity does not affect Note 13 pertaining to attached single family dwelling units and the comment should be revised to reflect this. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/22/2016 04/22/2016: WAYFINDING The project team has been asked to solve a wayfinding concern regarding efficient access to Tigercat Way. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell(a)fcclov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: Response to comment is related to the irrigation line and doesn't answer or address the request to ensure that maintenance responsibilities are clearly delineated between private parties and the City. If there are private storm lines on this site, they need to be clearly labeled on the plans. 03/01/2016: General Construction Notes: Update Storm Drainage Notes per redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: LID Location Plan: The Grass Buffer hatching is still not shown on this exhibit. Per the grading plan, it looks like there are many areas within the Grass Buffer area that are at 4:1 slopes. Maximum grades on the Grass Buffer areas is 10%. The grading plan needs to reflect this maximum if you want to include the Grass Buffers in your LID system. 03/01/2016: LID Location Plan: The Grass Buffer is not shown on this exhibit. Per the calculations provided in the drainage report, it doesn't seem that you need the grass buffer to meet your LID requirements anyway. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/18/2016: Second Request — I think adding these two labels is going to alleviate further questions from me and your contractor and adding these labels doesn't look like they will interfere with any information on the grading plans. 03/01/2016: Overlot Grading Plans: please label the storm sewers and irrigation pipe on the grading plans. Page 11 of 14 Comment Number: 2 04/19/2016: ELCO: Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 East Larimer County Water District (District) received the plat, site submittal and landscape plans for the above reference project and has the following comments: Landscape Plan: Sheet LP100, Note 8 states 6-ft of separation from trees and public water service lines. Detail G on Drawing LP501 delineates 8-ft of separation and therefore a conflict exists between the note and the detail. The District typically requires a minimum 10-ft of separation, though recognizing the small lot frontage available and I assume City standards requiring a certain density of tree plantings, we are ok with 8-ft. In reviewing the drawings it appears the majority of the water services have 8-ft of separation, though some appear to have slightly less (per scaling on drawing). I would ask the landscape architect revisit the water service and tree separations and make every effort to attain that distance (8-ft). The services to the following lots have a tree(s) too close to the line and need adjusted (service and/or tree location adjusted). • Tract N, Lot 9 • Block 6, Lot 11 The District is working with the project utility engineer on review and revisions to the waterline on the utility plans. Department: Park Planning Contact: Matt Day, , Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 03/02/2016: The plans look good from the Park Planning side of things and I will follow up with them about property acquisition and timing of the raw water line. Thanks, Matt Matthew Day, RLA Senior Landscape Architect Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, ilynxwiler(a�poudre-fire.ora Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: PAGE LS101, Comment#10 Comment 10 on Page LS101 indicates that every dwelling unit within the development will be equipped with a fire sprinkler system. Please amend comment to reflect actual condition. Page 10 of 14 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 04/19/2016: Boxelder: 1) Show and label all plugs accordingly in the plan and profile view. Provide plug detail. 2) The design engineer will need to coordinate with Farnsworth Group on design of BSD offsite sewer connection. The District has adequate capacity to service the property referenced above. The District is in full compliance with Federal and State water quality requirements. We look forward to review future submittals on this project. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Brian Zick, P.E. District Engineer Contact: Dan Kapperman, , Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/22/2016 04/22/2016: Comcast: Comcast Cable does not see utility easements around the lots. Maps are drawn like there are easements but could not find dimensions for the easements. Comcast Cable would also like to ask for a utility easement along the north property line outside of the Rail Road right of way. Comcast will be building this development as a fiber to the home development and will need to work with the developer on both internal wiring of the home and the external requirements to have this built as a fiber to the home development. This design will require the homes to be prewired differently that we have done in the past and conduits buried from each home back to the Comcast pedestals. We would also like to ask for a joint trench with other dry utilities to place our facilities. Contact: Randy Sheid, , Topic: General Page 9 of 14 Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Street light placement will need to be coordinated with Light & Power Engineering. Shade trees are required to maintain 40 feet of separation and ornamental trees are required to maintain 15 feet of separation from street lights. A link to the City of Fort Collins street lighting requirements can be found below: http://www.larimer.org/engineering/GMARdStds/Ch 15_04_01 _2007. pdf Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03104/2016: A commercial service information form (C-1 Form) and a one line diagram for each commercial meter will need to be completed and submitted to Light and Power Engineering. A link to this document is below: http://www.fcgov. com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development- forms-guidelines-regulations Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Transformer locations will need to be coordinated with Light & Power. Each transformer must be placed within 10 ft of a drivable surface for installation and maintenance purposes. Also each transformer must have a front clearance of 8 ft and side/rear clearance of 3 ft. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Light & Power will need the following documentation before electric design will begin and release for construction of the development: AutoCAD drawings of the approved site plan, landscape plan, utility plans. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: It was discussed and now assumed that 150 amp services are needed to feed the residential lots. Please contact Light and Power Engineering if 200 amp services are desired. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Is it preferred that the electric meters for the single family attached units be ganged on one side of the building or will each unit will have it's own electric service feed from the transformer? If its anticipated that the electric meters will be ganged on one side of the building, please design the electric meters on the opposite side of the building as the gas meters. If ganged, the developer will be responsible to install the feed from the secondary side of the transformer to the meters. Future maintenance of the feed from secondary side of the transformer to the meters will also be the responsibility of the owner. Please contact Light and Power Engineering if you have any questions. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970.416.2772. Please reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at hftp://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Brian Zick, , Topic: General Page 8 of 14 Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Existing trees 34, 35, 38 and 39 need to be accurately located on the plan. These trees appear to be boundary trees meaning that the trunk is on both properties. The tree inventory does not show the location of these trees as boundary trees. These trees should be evaluated by an Internationl Society of Arboriculture certified arborist. The certified arborist should provide a written report with recommendations. The report should address if the trees are hazardous and what the proposed construction would do to them. The adjacent property owner will need to grant written permission for tree removal for any of the trees that are on both properties. Submit arborist report and the permission letter from adjacent property owner. Department: Internal Services Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter(cDfcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Please schedule a pre -submittal meeting for this project. Pre -Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid -design stage for this meeting to be effective. Applicants of new projects should email scarter@fcgov.com to schedule a pre -submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Contact: Todd Reidenbach, , Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 03/02/2016: Please include the following comment(s) from GIS: 1. Addresses will be assigned by the GIS Department after the plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. .............................. TODD REIDENBACH, GISP Department: Light And Power Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsiegmund(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development. Please visit the following website for an estimate of charges and fees: http://www.fcgov. com/uti lities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investment-de velopment-fees Page 7 of 14 Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Continued: Separation distance between trees and water and sewer service lines is 6 feet but is shown at 8 in detail G on sheet LP501. Revise to show tree separation distance from water and sewer lines at 6 feet. 10/02/2015: Provide two typical lot details for street tree placement on the plan. One for a midblock lot and one for a corner lot. Show the location of street trees, driveways, stop signs, water and sewer service lines and street lights. Show the scaled distance of the trees from each of these features. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Continued: It appears that all of the lots are less than 60 feet. Show only one street tree at the front of all lots. Some lots still have two trees to their front which need to be reduced to one street tree. 10/02/2015: Most if not all of the lots appear to be 60 feet or less in width. LUC 3.2.1 D 2 provides for only one street per lot on these narrower lots. If two or more consecutive residential lots along a street each measure between 40 and 60 fee in street frontage width, on tree per lot may be substituted for the 30-40 foot spacing requirement. With driveway and utility tree separation standards only one street tree can fit on narrower lots. Adjust street tree placements to follow this standard for all narrower lots. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Continued: Review and apply this standard. Many groups have rows of same species over 7 trees. There should generally be an even mix of groups that include 3, 5 or 7 of the same species in a row. Seven is the max but should not dominate. Greater mixing of different species groups is needed. Many of the same species groups need to be broken into two or more groups. Contact the City Forester if there are questions. 10/02/2015: Provide for greater variation in the groups of same species street tree clusters that follow the Streetscape Standards of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standard Appendix C. (See standard 4.1.2 page 8 of that document). Typically same species groups of only three, five or seven trees are shown with only occasional variation of these quantities for defined design reasons. Achieve variation with only canopy shade trees unless planting is shown next to street lights. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/04/2016 03/04/2016: Please add the City of Fort Collins Tree Protection notes to the plan. Obtain these notes from the City Forester or City Planner. Page 6 of 14 Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/20/2016: The City will require a security for both the wetland creation and monitoring, as well as installation and establishment of the NHBZ around the compensatory wetland. The securities can be in the form of a letter of credit, bond letter, or escrow (cash or check), and are due at the time of DCP. We will need two separate cost estimates; one for construction of the mitigation wetland and monitoring, and another for installation and establishment of the NHBZ, including labor, irrigation, materials, weed management and monitoring. A mitigation and monitoring plan will also need to be submitted and will be included as part of the Development Agreement. The plan should include detail regarding the project site, existing wetland conditions, wetland impacts, mitigation concept plan and map, timetable for construction of the compensatory wetland, as well as the cost and probability of success for the new wetland. Here's a link to a good example of a more complete wetland mitigation and monitoring plan: https://www-static. bouldercolorado.gov/docs/bcc_wetland_mitigation_plan-1-20130 7051635. pdf 03/01/2016: Please note that the mitigation plan will also need to include estimated mitigation costs associated with this development in order to determine the amount of bond that the City of Fort Collins would require. This bond will be included as a part of the project Development Agreement. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/20/2016: The labeling is not consistent or complete. It's missing labels on several of the utility sheets, as well on the landscape and site plans. On the utility plans, it needs to be changed from "habitat boundary" to "Natural Habitat Buffer Zone". Please go through the plans and use the term Natural Habitat Buffer Zone consistently in the legend and labeling. 03/01/2016: The Natural Habitat Buffer Zone (NHBZ) needs to be labeled on the site, grading, utility, and landscape plans. A note should be added to the site, landscape, utility, grading, and storm sewer plan that the natural habitat area is meant to be maintained in a native landscape. This will help preserve the intention behind the buffer zones and the natural features into the future. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/20/2016: 1 only see this note on sheet LP100. Please add to LP407 and LP408 and any site and landscape plans that show the NHBZ. Also, as indicated in Comment 6, a note needs to be added to the site, landscape, utility, grading, and storm sewer plan that the natural habitat area is meant to be maintained in a native landscape. This will help preserve the intention behind the buffer zones and the natural features into the future. 03/01/2016: Please add the following statement to the notes on any sheets that show the NHBZ: Please see Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within the buffer zone. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Please add the following note to the landscape plans: "All tree removal shown shall be completed outside of the songbird nesting season (Feb 1 - July 31) or a survey will be conducted of the trees to be removed to ensure that no active nests are present." Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Remove "proposed" from the wetland and upland areas on sheet LP408. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchananofcgov.com Page 5 of 14 Contact: Kelly Kimple, 970-416-2401, kkimple(a)_fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/20/2016: Additional plants do not appear to have been added, in comparison to the plans submitted on 1/5/16. If anything, shrubs have been removed in several areas and there has been no addition to the species diversity. In the upland areas on the south and east side of the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone, add chokecherry, current, and Boulder raspberry to form thickets for cover and forage. Also, in the southeast corner, there are a few shrubs on top of the storm drain inlet. Please move these shrubs to the north of the inlet and add more shrubs back into this area, as per the plans submitted on 1/5/16. 03/01/2016: On a site visit with the City Forestry Department on January 28, 2016, tree groves 10, 14 and 40 were identified for their wildlife habitat value. Mitigation for these groves should include wildlife habitat enhancements in addition to the standard tree mitigation plan. Additional shrubs and plant diversity could be added in the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone, such as Western Sandcherry, Golden Currant, and Boulder Raspberry. Other areas identified for mitigation include the detention area in the southwest corner of the development as well as the northeast corner near the plum thicket. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/20/2016: Please have the contractor you hire to remove the prairie dogs submit to us their removal plan, including method of removal and timing. 03/01/2016: During a site visit on January 28, 2016, an active prairie dog colony was observed on the site. City Code and the Land Use Code require that any prairie dogs inhabiting a site must be humanely eradicated (see Section 3.4.1(N)(6) of the Land Use Code). Additionally, if construction is scheduled after March 15th, a burrowing owl surrey shall be conducted prior to any development by a professional, qualified wildlife biologist in accordance with the Division of Parks and Wildlife standards. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/01/2016 04/20/2016: 1 did not see this note added to the landscape plans. 03/01/2016: A note should be added to the landscape plan regarding the seed mixes proposed on the wetland enlargement may change based on what species respond best. All seed mix changes shall be approved by the City's Environmental Planner. Page 4 of 14 Comment Number: 51 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Why is Delozier Road not built to the property line limits to the south? Since the inlets need to be constructed, the roadway should be built as well. Comment Number: 52 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Add the Private Drive Sign #13 to Sheet RD63. Comment Number: 53 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Sheets DT01-DT03 need City signature blocks. Comment Number: 54 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: What phase will the fire lane off of Barnstormer Drive be constructed? Comment Number: 55 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Should Marquise Drive be constructed with Phase 6 instead of Phase 7? If phase 6 occurs prior to 7, Marquise Drive will need to be constructed. Comment Number: 56 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Remove the temporary turnaround from PH02 Comment Number: 57 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04120/2016: The minimum transitions are 30'. Please refer to the intersection details redlines. The transition is measured from the flowline, not the edge of gutter or centerline of the cross street. Comment Number: 58 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Intersection names need to be fixed on Sheet RD56 Topic: Plat Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/20/2016: Show areas on the plat to either handwrite or type the reception numbers on the plat. 03/02/2016: Please provide easement vacation and dedication applications. Reception numbers will need to be shown on the plat. Comment Number: 44 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Add the following note to the plat: "There shall be no vehicular access off of Sykes Drive and Delozier Road to the residential lots abutting Sykes Drive or Delozier Road. Comment Number: 45 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Add the following note to the plat: "There shall be no private conditions, covenants or restrictions that prohibit or limit the installation of resource conserving equipment or landscaping that are allowed by sections 12-120 — 12-122 of the City Code." Comment Number: 46 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Show the revised Plat and Utility Plans with the portion of Timberline Road that will not be vacated. The portion of Timberline Road to the north of Sykes Drive will not be vacated, since it will be needed for the future Timberline Road realignment. Comment Number: 47 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: A reference or depiction is needed of the ROW vacation. Please work with Technical Services/Surveying to determine the best approach. The Ordinance Number and the Reception Number will need to be referenced on the Plat. Department: Environmental Planning Page 3 of 14 Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/20/2016: Storm Drain D (SD11) still does not meet the minimum cover. Please adjust. 03/02/2016: Please look at Storm Drain B (SD04), B8 (SD06), D (SD11), and Irrigation (SD21). Minimum cover is not met in areas. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/20/2016: Please refer to the plan and profile redlines. There are still some intersections that are missing the PCR's 03/02/2016: Show PCR6s on profiles or plan views or both. They need to be shown to see how they tie in to the intersection details. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/20/2016: Please refer to the plan and profile redlines. There are still some streets that do not meet the minimum k values or lengths. 03/02/2016: Please look at vertical curves on street profiles. For connector streets, k>/=40 and minimum lengths=90� for sag and k>/=30 and minimum lengths=90� for crest. For collector streets, k>/=60 and minimum lengths=120� for sag and crest. For arterial streets, k>/=90 and minimum lengths=150� for sag and k>/=110 and minimum lengths=150� for crest. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/20/2016: Please refer to the plan and profile as well as the intersection detail redlines. There are still references to ROW for Private Drives. 03/02/2016: Do not refer label ROW4s for private drives. See redlines on street Plan and Profile and Intersection sheets. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/20/2016: There are a couple sections that still exceed the 0.4% grade break. Please refer to redlines. 03/02/2016: See redlines for areas that exceed the 0.4% grade breaks. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/20/2016: Please refer to the intersection detail redlines. There are some areas that are missing spot elevations. 03/02/2016: Take a look at the Intersection Details Sheets (RD47-RD57). Spot elevations and transitions are missing. Please provide. Minimum cross slopes outside of the transitions need to be a minimum of 2.0%. Some slopes shown at intersection corners greater than 2.0% does not meet ADA across of ramps. Comment Number: 59 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Add a note to the Utility Plans (UT01) that indicates the fire access gate will not swing into the public ROW. Comment Number: 48 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: The waterline (WT01) does not met the 18" separation. See redlines. Comment Number: 49 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: There are a couple of Stations on the road profiles that should be moved so they align with the plan drawings. See redlines. Comment Number: 50 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 04/20/2016: Label ROW on Conquest Way and Conquest Street on the plan drawings (RD11). See redlines. Page 2 of 14 Fort Collins April 22, 2016 RE: East Ridge 2nd Filing, FDP160006, Round Number 2 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/deve/0pmentrev/ew Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at 970-221-6754 or pwray@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, Dwray(a)fcciov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/22/2016 04/22/2016: As stated at the staff review meeting, you can proceed to an informal PDF review prior to determining if plans are ready for mylar. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 04/19/2016: Update LP notes per word file attached for any new language not included to date. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 04/19/2016: Update all sheets for index diagram to reflect location for each sheet. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 04/19/2016: See attached word file to update site plan notes with any new information not included with original notes. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/02/2016 04/20/2016: The sidewalk chases need to be perpendicular to the street. Please adjust. Alley driveway radius' need to be 5'. This should allow for the chases to not be within the curb return 03/02/2016: Angled sidewalk chases are not allowed. Please adjust. Page 1 of 14