The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About320 MAPLE MIXED-USE - FDP - FDP160032 - CORRESPONDENCE -08/15/2016: Details — Included in the plans is Detail 14 — Standard Interior Setting for 3/4" and 1" meters. Where are you proposing this? If not proposed, please remove from the plans. Department: Zoning Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416.2743, avandeutekom(a)fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/31/2016 08/31/2016: Can you just list the required number of parking spaces for the TOD so we are clear in the future only 26 spaces were required. C 08/30/2016: Please remove address from the plans. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 08/30/2016: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 08/30/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 08/30/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 08/30/2016: Is the 9.03' Utility Easement along Maple Street supposed to be a 9' Utility Easement? Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 08/30/2016: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970.221-6704, eolsoncDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/29/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell(&fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/15/2016: Existing Conditions Plan —please update Note 10 on this page to indicate abandonment at the main is required. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/15/2016: Utility Plan - The proposed water service needs to be separated from the sanitary sewer service by a minimum of 10' and should be aligned perpendicular to the meter vault. Please revise. (repeat comment) Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/15/2016: Utility Plan - What is the plan for the existing cable and electric lines that are shown in conflict with the proposed water meter vault? Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/29/2016 08/15/2016 08/15/2016 08/15/2016 08/15/2016 5 vault that will address its maintenance and inspection requirements. I have drafted up an overall SOP document for the other stormwater systems on the site and can email that to you for reference if needed. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated 09/01/2016: Drainage Plan — Per our recent meetings and discussions on the matter, our group has determined that we are not going to allow under -building detention vaults because of concerns related to access, proper maintenance and the ability to readily identify and fix any performance issues that may occur to the detention vault over time. From our meeting to discuss this issue with the design engineers on 9-1-16 it sounded like they were able to determine a workable solution to the detention requirement and that is to provide some surface or parking lot detention within the parking area below the podium of the building. We are ok with that approach moving forward and will require a 3D easement for the detention pond area here. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischlam{a�fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 09/01 /2016 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016 08/09/2016: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan (Redlines), Erosion Control Report (Acceptable updated to match the last revision when EC Plan is OK), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (Not submitted or at very least was not distributed to Erosion Control) . If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtaylorofcgov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/18/2016 The Floodplain Modeling Report which we received August 9, is in the queue with a due date of September 7 (we have a 20 business day review time, which is independent of Planning Department review schedules). Comments will be sent directly to the Developer's engineer. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/18/2016 08/18/2016: The Comment Sheet submitted with this review, indicated that previous comments regarding floodplain notes, floodplain cross -sections, no -rise certification requirements, etc. would be included in a Floodplain Exhibit as a part of the Project Utility Drawings. That sheet was not included in the drawings received in this office, so the previous comments still need to be addressed. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, jcountyC�fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 08/30/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 4 projects to or above the top of the fence. This can be confirmed by phone and email. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/02/2016 09/02/2016: Please simplify the west elevation as shown on marked -up plans and discussed at the meeting, to be more compatible with the traditional neighborhood setting of Meldrum Street as well as more consistent with staffs explanation at the Council appeal hearing. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/02/2016 09/02/2016: Call or email to coordinate the content of a new submittal. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224.6065, hmcdowellga fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/15/2016 08/15/2016: Storm Plan and Profile — Indicate if the storm outfall from the detention vault is private or public. Since this appears to be a private line in a public alley, this needs to be ok'ed by Engineering. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/15/2016 08/15/2016: Storm Plan and Profile —18-inches of separation is required between the existing water main and the proposed storm pipe. The requirement is as follows: When a public water main crosses under a wastewater/stormwater/other non -potable utility pipe, the water main should maintain 18-inches of vertical clearance. All joints of the wastewater/stormwater/other non -potable utility within 10 feet of the water main shall be wrapped with butyl adhesive tape or the piping of the non -potable system within 10 feet of the water main shall be C900/C905 PVC. If 18-inches of separation cannot be achieved then a casing shall be installed around the waterline and extend a minimum of 10 feet beyond each side of the crossing. Please provide a note on these plans that directs the contractor to verify separation between the two utilities and that they will be required to install a casing around the waterline during construction if 18" separation is not met. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/15/2016 08/15/2016: Details � The orifice plate detail should include location information of the orifice opening so the contractor installs it correctly. Also, please include a detail of the Landscape Buffer. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/15/2016 08/15/2016: Drainage Exhibit— Please add existing impervious area and proposed impervious area to this page for stormwater fees. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/15/2016 08/15/2016: Plat - Drainage easements - Like the Uncommon project, we can address the upper level LID planters through Development Agreement language that grants the City access for periodic inspection - to the upper levels where the LID planters are located. Please let me know if this approach is acceptable to the team. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 08/29/2016 08/29/2016: Drainage —Please provide an SOP for this underground detention 3 Department: Light And Power Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish(a�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/31/2016 08/31/2016: Transformer may need to be rotated to open toward the alley. Electric service standards calls for 8' of clearance in front of the doors of the transformer. As shown on the plans, it does not meet the clearance requirement from the wall. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/31/2016 08/31/2016: Where will the CT cabinet and meters be located? They are not allowed inside the building. Please refer to the Electric Service Standards at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo rms-guidelines-regulations Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/31/2016 08/31/2016: A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one line diagram for the commercial meter will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering. A link to the C-1 form is below: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo rms-guidelines-regulations Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/31/2016 08/3112016: Any relocation or modification to existing electric facilities will be at the expense of the owner/developer. If Light & Power's existing electric facilities are to remain within the limits of the project they must be located within a utility easement. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/31/2016 08/31/2016: Electric Capacity Fee and Building Site charges will apply to this development. Please click on the following link for Estimated Light & Power charges and the Light & Power Fee calculator. http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo rms-guidelines-regulations Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler(cDpoudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/12/2016 08/1212016: The alternative means for meeting Fire Code requirements for Aerial Access will be discussed at the FDP. Department: Planning Services Contact: Clark Mapes, 970-221-6225, cmapes(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 08/30/2016: Fence design: The intent for the ivy or vines is to soften the effect of the development for the neighbor to the north, so they need to be on a trellis that 2 Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970,224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview September 02, 2016 Craig Russell Russell + Mills Studios 141 S. College Ave Ste 104 Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: 320 Maple Mixed -Use, FDP160032, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Clark Mapes, at 970-221-6225 or cmapes@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Andrews, 970-221-6501, kandrews(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 08/30/2016: The public alley driveway should be designed according to LCUASS Drawing 803 alley standards, not 707.1 high volume private driveway. Please update this on the plan and in the construction details. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/30/2016 08/30/2016: Please add "320" before "Maple" in the planset title, for clarity. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(Mcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/28/2016 08/28/2016: Forestry previously recommended American Sentry Linden which is a narrow crowned cultivar. On closer review there is enough space for a broader crowned cultivar of American linden. Let's use Boulevard American Linden as the 4 new street trees in place of American Sentry.