Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWIND SONG AT ROCK CREEK - FDP - FDP160010 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSReviewer— Wes lamarque Phone 970-416-2418 / email — wlamargue@fceov.com Water -wastewater Engineering / General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Water lines that are crossing under other utilities greater than 24 inches need to be sleeved. Please provide the sleeving detail in the plans as well. 05/10/2016: Please provide a 20 foot sleeve rather than 10 feet. 10'sleeve has been provided, please see utility plans Signed, Ron Jackson Lenity Architecture 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 503 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com ................................... ......,_.......... -.................. ............................................... Page 12 of 12 Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 If the Eye Center Of Northern Colorado plat is filed before this, please make changes as shown. See redlines 05/10/2016: If the Eye Center Of Northern Colorado plat is filed before this, please make changes as shown. See redlines. Addressed Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 All easements must be labeled & locatable. See redlines 05/10/2016: All easements must be labeled & locatable. See redlines. Addressed Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Please make corrections to the Basis Of Bearings statement. See redlines. Addressed Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Please make corrections to the Basis Of Bearings statement. See redlines. Addressed Reviewer— Jeff County Phone 970-221-6588 / email — jcounty@fceov.com Technical Services / Stie Plan Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 No comments. 05/10/2016: No plans were provided for review. Please find attached site plan Reviewer— Martina Wilkenson Phone 970-221-6887 / email — mwilkinson@fcgov.com Traffic Operation / General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/11/2016 Work with engineering to get the sidewalks, ramp, and signal pole with pedestrian push buttons at Rock Creek and Ziegler to work properly Noted 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 503 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com Page I l of 12 Reviewer — Jeff County Phone 970-221-6588 / email — jcounty@fcgov.com Technical Services / Landscape Plans Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 There are line over text issues. See redlines 05/10/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me directly at 503-399-1090. Please note that line over text was a line created by the scanning of the sheet. Note we have reviewed and this is no longer s issue. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Please add the name "Windsong At Rock Creek" to the titleblock on all sheets. Please note we have added this to all sheets Reviewer — Jeff County Phone 970-221-6588 / email —jcounty@fca;ov.com Technical Services / Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Please make sure all plat language is the most current City language. 05/10/2016: Please make sure all plat language is the most current City language. Addressed Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Does the South Fort Collins Sanitation District need to sign? 05/10/2016: Does the South Fort Collins Sanitation District need to sign? Yes, signature block has been added to cover sheet Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Please add dedication information for all street rights of way. See redlines. 05/10/2016: Please add dedication information for all street rights of way. See redlines. Addressed 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 r 503 399 1090 603 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com Page 10 of 12 Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 The location of the 30' SFCSD Easement does not match the Subdivision Plat. See redlines. Addressed Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Addressed Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/12/2016 Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Addressed Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/12/2016 There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Addressed Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 05/12/2016 There are text over text issues. See redlines. Addressed Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/12/2016 There are match line issues on sheets 23 & 24. See redlines. Addressed 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 503 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com Page 9 of 12 Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/11/2016 The storm sewers between ponds A & B as well as A & C need to pass the 100-year flows for the basins that drain to the upstream ponds Storm sewer has capacity to pass 100-year flows for all basins upstream of ponds, please see drainage report. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/11/2016 Please delineate on the drainage plan the proposed area of sand filter material. This would be the flat bottom of these ponds, which needs to be equal to the required area in the calculations. Area of sand filter material has been provided, please see utility plans Reviewer — Jeff County Phone 970-221-6588 / email —icounty@fcgov.com Technical Services / Building Elevations Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 No comments. 05/10/2016: No plans were provided for review Please find attached Exterior Building Elevations sheet 11 of 13 Reviewer— Jeff County Phone 970-221-6588 / email —icounty@fcgov.com Technical Services / Construction Drawings Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 There are line over text issues. See redlines 05/10/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines Please note that line over text was a line created by the scanning of the sheet. Note we have reviewed and this is no longer s issue. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 There are sheet number issues. See redlines 05/10/2016: There are sheet number issues. See redlines. Addressed .................................................................................................... 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 603 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com _........_ii............................................................. I........................... Page 8 of 12 Reviewer— Wes Lamarque Phone 970-416-2418 / email — wlamaroue@poudre-fire.ore Stormwater Engineering / General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 The porous paver underdrain needs to be extended to capture a greater area of the paver section. Also, please show cleanout locations. 05/10/2016: Please label cleanouts All cleanouts have been labeled with northing and eastings, inverts and rim elevations. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Is any erosion protection required at the pipe outlets? 05/10/201.6: Please replace riprap with permanent erosion control fabric. This is due to maintenance concerns. Scourstop pads have been added in replacement of riprap outlet protection, please see utility plans Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Please provide the sand filter detail from Urban Drainage 05/10/2016: The detail requires some modifications Sand filter detail has been modified to match windsong site layout, please see utility plans Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 The landscaping plan shows evergreen trees in the sand filter where removal of material will be required. This will not be possible with trees in the sand filter material. Please revise landscape plan Please note we have removed the evergreen trees from the sand filter areas. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/11/2016 Riprap is not required for the spillway Riprap removed from spillway, please see utility plans Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/11/2016 Please label the soft pan on the grading and drainage plan and reference the detail. Soft swale has been called out on multiple sheets, please see utility plans 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 603 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com _ .................... ................. Page 7 of 12 Reviewer— Tim Buchanan Phone 970-221-6361/ email — tbuchanan@fcsov.com Forestry / Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 - What was the 3/30 comment Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 12/23/2015: A redbud tree is shown in the parking lot peninsula at the North East section of the project. The Land Use code standard is for use of canopy shade tree in these parking lot locations. Please review this landscape area for a canopy shade tree. Please note this tree has been relocated. Reviewer— Rob Irish Phone 970-224-6167 / email — rirish@fcsov.com Light and Power / General Comment Number: 4 - What is the 5/11 comment Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 Electric Capacity Fee and Building Site charges will apply to this development. Please click on the following link for Estimated Light & Power charges and the Light & Power Fee calculator. http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investment-development-fees 5/11/2016 This comment is understood. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/11/2016 Did not receive a utility plan set in the packet for this round. Please see attached utility plans & plat Reviewer— Jim Lynxwiler Phone 970-416-2869 / email — rilynxwiler@poudre-fire.ore PFA / General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/28/2016 Auto -turn requested to show that an engine can negotiate the serpentine maneuver south of the main entrance Please see attached Windsong Truck Turning Exhibit for further clarification 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 503 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com Page 6 of 12 05/11/2O16: The plat language hasn't been updated, please see the following link: httP://www.fcgov.com/deveIopmentreview/pdf/subdivision plat final submittal requirements 2016.pdf Addressed, please see plat Reviewer— Marc Virata Phone 970-221-6567/ email — mvirata@fcRov.com Engineering Development / Site Plan Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/11/2016 The site plan appears to be missing Planning's approval blocks and should be coordinated with the project planner. Please see cover sheet for Planning approval block. 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 603 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com Page 5 of 12 Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 The construction of directional access ramps at the Rock Creek/Ziegler intersection abutting the site is not depicted on the plans and needs to be designed on the civil plans from both a horizontal and vertical perspective with spot elevations, grades, widths, etc. The access ramps need to show how they align with existing crosswalks across Rock Creek and Ziegler. Additionally the access ramps and sidewalk system need to show how they function in relation to existing infrastructure (or relocated infrastructure accordingly) -- there appears to be the existing signal pole that would be in conflict with the sidewalk design, as well as an existing control box that's not depicted on the plans and may be in conflict as well 05/11/2016: The placement of the standard drawing LCUASS 1604 ramp results in the existing traffic signal pole placed into the new sidewalk along Ziegler Road. I've verified with Martina Wilkinson in Traffic Operations that we won't necessarily require the directional ramps at this intersection as commented below, but the project will still have to provide a design that has the sidewalk abutting the signal pole, not have the signal pole in the sidewalk. LCUA551604 ramp has been modified as to not interfere with existing light pole, please see utility plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 A receiving access ramp needs to be provided on the east side of the private drive intersecting Rock Creek Drive, designed on the civil plans and depicted on the plans 05/11/2016: The access ramps aren't depicted correctly on the civil plans and the receiving ramp itself is still missing on the site plan. Access ramps have been updated and site plan shows appropriate layout Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 A $250 deed of dedication Transportation Development Review Fee is needed with the offsite drainage easement, with the actual dedication needing to be provided along with recording fees prior to approval of the plans. SFCSD's approval of their easement and recordation needs to similarly occur prior to plan approval (with reception numbers on both easements indicated on the subdivision plat). If the boundary of the drainage easement is considered in its final form with Stormwater, the legal description for the drainage easement can be reviewed by Technical Services. Since the SFCSD easement isn't conveyed to the City, fees and review of the easement isn't required. 05/11/2016: Carried over for reference on the need for a legal description for the offsite drainage easement. Easements included with this pre-mylar submittal and are currently being executed. Owner is aware that final approval from the city, cannot be obtained without the items listed in this comment. Noted. Reviewer— Marc Virata Phone 970-221-6567/ email — mvirata@fcsov.com Engineering Development / Plat Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 The plat language on the cover sheet appears to be outdated and will need to be updated to our current requirements. I can email the current version separately 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 503 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com Page 4 of 12 be depicted and built either as LCUASS 707.1 or 707.2, utilizing concrete fully in the right-of-way. (It would seem that 707.1 could be the design parameter with less concrete along the curb returns.) 05/11/2016: The drawings provide a detail of 707.1 presumably used forthe full movement driveway out to Rock Creek. The access ramps aren't drawn to match the detail and need to be corrected, they should appear to continue straight across the driveway and not brought out closer to the street. Access ramps have been updated to match detail, please see utility plans Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/11/2016 Please correct the indication of 3 Sheet 17's. Addressed, please see utility plans Reviewer— Marc Virata Phone 970-221-6567/ email — mvirata@fcaov.com Engineering Development / General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 There appears to have been a change between PDP to Final regarding the widths of the sidewalks on Ziegler Road (from 6 feet to 7 feet) and Rock Creek Drive (from 5 feet to 6 feet). Just wondering how this came about (and perhaps I may have not recalled a conversation regarding the increase in sidewalk widths.) The street classifications for Ziegler and Rock Creek have sidewalk width requirements of 6 feet and 5 feet respectively. The additional 1 foot provided on both streets would not be eligible for street oversizing reimbursement and with that in mind, I would question perhaps whether the additional width adds much value to the pedestrian given proposed (Eye Center), to be constructed (Mainstreet) and existing (Intel) sidewalks on Ziegler Road are at 6 feet, and similarly existing sidewalk along Rock Creek is 5 feet. 05/11/2016: Carried over as I understand the widths will be changing to the minimum standard Addressed, please see utility plans 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 r 503 399 1090 603 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com Page 3 of 12 Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 On the Lighting Plan, sheet E2.1, please remove all data (schedule, mounting heights, fire alarm, heat schedule, legend) that relates to interior lighting. We do not review interior lighting. Please note that all data that relates to interior lighting has been removed from set. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 On the Exterior Luminaire Schedule, please add a column for quantity. Please see Site Lighting Plan Sheet 7 of 13 for added quantity column Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Instead of the graphic on sheet E1.2 that depicts the three types of pole lighting, please replace with a manufacturer's specification sheet. Be sure to include the detail for the House Side Shield as called for. Please note that details have been removed see manufactures specification for fixture information. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Please provide a specification sheet for the wall -mounted fixtures and under -canopy fixtures. Please see manufactures specification for wall -mounted fixtures Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Please add a note that the under -canopy lighting must be "flush -mount and flat lens." The light source must be fully recessed and concealed and not protrude below the underside of the canopy deck. Please see added note on Site Lighting Plan Sheet 7 of 13 and Photometric Plan sheet 8 of 13 Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 We typically see in the schedule a data point that indicates the Light Loss Factor. We require that the illuminance plan be calibrated and depicted with a Light Loss Factor of 1.0. Please provide this data point and adjust the illuminance plan accordingly, if necessary Please see Photometric Plan for this information Reviewer— Marc Virata Phone 970-221-6567/ email — mvirata@fcsov.com Engineering Development / Construction Drawings Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 The private drive intersecting Rock Creek Drive should not be built as a public street intersection, which is implied with the cross plan depicted on the plans and the inclusion of LCUASS Detail 708. This driveway should 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 603 399 0565 lenityarchitecture.com Page 2 of 12 lenity a-chitedure 5/17/2016 City of Fort Collins 281 N College Ave Fort Collins, CO 80522Address Re: Windsong at Rock Creek (Fort Collins Memory Care) FDP160010, Round 2 These are responses to your comments letter dated May 17, 2016. Reviewer— Ted Shepard Phone 970-221-6343/ email — tshepard@fcgov.com Planning Services / General Comment Number: 3. Comment Originated: 03/30/2016: The trash enclosure is specified to be 7'6" in height which seems a bit high. Perhaps this can be lowered to six feet so it is not as imposing with no loss of screening capability OS/10/2016: Carried Over, not seeing the trash enclosure detail. Please note that trash enclosure has been revised to show 6'-O" walls. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016: Please add all signature blocks and standard notes to the site plan cover sheet and label site, landscape, architectural, lighting sheets sequentially. I can provide standard notes in a word document. 05/10/2016: Carried Over. Please note this has been added to the cover sheet. Note we have also added numbers to the sheets. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 The Irrigation Plan and Details are not a part of the Planning Set for recording final mylars. Please remove sheets A1.2a, A1.2b, A1.4a from the set. Sheet A1.4b includes a mix of details from the Landscape Plan (needed) and the Irrigation Plan (unneeded). Please adjust the sheets so that the Landscape Plan details are retained and Irrigation Plan details are removed. Please note that the Irrigation Plan is submitted separately, post recording, to Eric Olson in Water Utilities. Please note that we have removed the irrigation plans these sheet from the set. Note that we have also deleted the irrigation details as well. 3150 Kettle Court SE Salem, OR 97301 503 399 1090 503 399 0565 lenityarchftecture.com Page I of 12