HomeMy WebLinkAboutREGISTRY RIDGE SEVENTH FILING, REPLAT OF FILINGS TWO & FOUR - FDP - FDP150015 - CORRESPONDENCE - (6)Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 3
05/12/2015: No comments.
Topic: Plat
Comment Originated: 05/12/2015
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/12/2015
05/12/2015: Please add bearings and/or distances as marked. See redlines.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 5
05/12/2015: No comments.
Comment Originated: 05/12/2015
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: 1 thought that an alignment for the trail connection had been determined
in the field, but it looks like what is shown on the plans isn't what we determined in
the field.....
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: I'll have some signing and striping redlines for you.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson(&fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/21/2015
04/21/2015: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit.
The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of
the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric
Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/07/2015
05/07/2015: The irrigation plan is incomplete. Please refer to the provisions outlined
in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Identify master valve, backflow device and
smart controller with weather station on the irrigation legend. Direct questions
concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Page 6 of 6
. I Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/12/2015
05112/2015: FIRE LANE SIGNAGE
Drawing 1418 (page C901), showing Fire Access Road Signage does not show
most up-to-date fire department standards. The STANDARD fire lane sign (on left)
is the sign of choice however, the wording, "by order of the fire marshal" shall be
omitted and replaced with indicating arrows. The UNIVERSAL fire lane sign (on
right) is not recommended for use in this application and requires fire marshal
approval. Refer to 2012 IFC Appendix D (D103.6) for details.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischlam(a)fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 04/21/2015
04/21/2015: Erosion Control Plans have redlines and missing details. See
Stormwaters' materials. Erosion Control Report has a minor comment on page 2
about the vegetative density. Erosion Control Escrow needs to be submitted after
changes from the erosion control plans are acceptable. If you need clarification
concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam
970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty(a�fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 1
05/12/2015: No comments.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 05/12/2015
Comment Originated: 05/12/2015
05/13/2015: Since the surveying was done using NAVD88, please do not change
the plans. Please provide the following statement, to make it clear that these plans
use NAVD88 and the surrounding developments are on NGVD29 Unadjusted. The
complete Benchmark Statement is added to show placement of the note.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.
SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED FOR
THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE
FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88
- X.XX'.
05/12/2015: Why are the plans using NAVD88, when the surrounding development
of Registry Ridge is NGVD29 Unadjusted? The City has gone to NAVD88, but this
project would be grandfathered into NGVD29 Unadjusted. We would highly
recommend that you stay on NGVD29 Unadjusted.
Page 5 of 6
Comment Number: 11
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015:
COMMENT CONTINUED FROM 02/09/15
Thanks you for making adjustments to street trees and adding some additional
trees. The Landscape Architect should contact the City Forester to receive some
additional street tree location and ornamental versus shade tree comments that will
need to be incorporated into the final plan. A brief meeting to review requested
changes is needed.
11
02/09/2015:
Is it possible to place a street tree by any of the following lots and still meet the
separation standards? These lots are located south of Bon Homme Richard Drive
on the circle that includes Nimitz, Hornet and Enterprise and don't appear to have a
street tree located by them. If planting on any of these lots is limited by a street light
then evaluated use of an ornamental tree such as Chanticleer Pear.
These lots include:
Lots 4 and 5 that face south in block 10
Lots 3 and 4 that face north in block 7
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015:
COMMENT CONTINUED FROM 02/09/15
The onsite meeting was held to provide tree inventory and mitigation information.
The City Forester did not receive this information in the review packet as it may be
on the site plan and only a landscape plan was included. The landscape architect
should email the tree inventory and mitigation plan to the City Forester for review. All
existing trees need to be inventoried and mitigation and transplanting accounted for.
02/09/2015:
Contact the City Forester for an on -site meeting to obtain tree condition and
mitigation information to complete the table on sheet SP 102. Provide upsized
mitigation trees to meet the mitigation requirement. LUC 3.2.1 F.
Canopy Shade trees 3.0 inch caliper
Ornamental trees 2.5 inch caliper
Evergreen trees 8 feet height
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015:
Street trees along South Shields are placed at around 60 feet. These trees need to
be spaced at 40 between trees. Additional tree or trees may be needed to meet the
40 foot spacing standard.
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05113/2015:
MRB is used as a tree label. This label is not recorded in the plant schedule. City
Forestry is requesting that where a crabapple is used as a street tree that the
cultivar Red Baron Crabapple be used.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05113/2015:
The 4 trees along Nimitz Drive just north of Bon Homme Richard Drive are noted to
be installed and maintained by homeowner. This note should be edited to say
installed by developer and maintained by home owner.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler(apoudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Page 4 of 6
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Stormline 2 does not meet the minimum cover. Please adjust. The
water line may need to be lowered to meet the minimum cover. See redlines (Sheet
C500)
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Elevations and stations on the street profiles for Hornet Drive do not
match the intersection details on Sheet C702. Please adjust
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Show the transition length on Enterprise Drive from the crosspan on
Bon Homme Richard Drive. The minimum length is 30'.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: More details are needed for the intersections with sidewalk chases.
Please show how drainage will be conveyed through these chases. Will they be via
curb cuts or low points?
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Please use updated Larimer County Urban Area Street Standard
Drawings. Please update Drawings 706, 707, 1601, 1606, 1606(a), and 1607. Detail
1603 for Access Ramps will need to be added to the Utility Plan.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: The Type I driveway approaches for detached walks have curb
transitions on either side of the driveway, but not on the sidewalk approaches on
either side of the drive. See Detail 706.1. The Utility Plans currently show drievway
curb transitions on one side of the driveway and flares on the sidewalks
approaches.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Please adjust the plat to show the sidewalk on Cabot Court, Tract C,
Lot 1 in an access easement. With the new design for the ditch crossing, the
location for this sidewalk may change.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Parking is not allowed in emergency access easements. The angled
parking in Kitty Hawk Court overhangs into this easement. Either adjust the plat to
exclude the parking in the emergency access easement or move the parking stalls
further north out of the easement.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(cDfcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Page 3 of 6
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/23/2045
04/23/2015: Will the units be gas or electric heat?
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
There are two conflictions with street lights and trees.
1. Existing tree at SE corner of Enterprise and Bon Homme Richard Dr will have to
be removed due to confliction with street light.
2. GTS tree @ SW area of Nimitz and Hornet Dr will have to be relocated or the
street light will have to be moved across the private drive to the north in order to
maintain street light and tree clearances.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: The minimum distance between street cuts is 75'. Please adjust the
street overlay limits on Nimitz Drive north of the roundabout.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Utility Plans show a sidewalk width of 4' on the north of Bon Homme
Richard Drive. The minimum sidewalk width is 4.5' for a local collector street. Since
this section of the street is being rebuilt, minimum sidewalk widths will be required.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: The driveways to Saipan Court and Kitty Hawk Court (Private Drives)
are shown as Type III driveways. Please change labels on the Utility Plan.
Intersection details show a transition from flush to rollover curb and gutter, however
these driveway approaches are vertical curb and gutter. Also, please show ADA
ramps at these locations.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: The driveway approaches on Cabot Court need to show curb
transitions on both sides of the driveway. Specific details may need to be added to
the driveway approaces with sidewalk chases to make sure that drainage and curb
transitions will work.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05113/2015: The sidewalk chase at Saipan Court may interfere with the water
service to Lot 1. See redlines.
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Please remove detail D-11. There are no chases with attached
sidewalks.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Please show the gas main shortened to be within the utility easement
on the Utility Plan, Sheet 301.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Please include the Fort Collins Loveland Water District and the South
Fort Collins Sanitation District signature blocks on all necessary utility sheets in the
Utility Plan.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/13/2015
05/13/2015: Please adjust the Legend on sheet C301. Existing utilities in the legend
should have a lighter line weight. See redlines
Page 2 of 6
Fort Collins
May 15, 2015
Robert Quinette
BQ LLLC
10221 Prestwick Trail
Lone Tree, CO 80124
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224,6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
RE: Registry Ridge Seventh Filing - Replat of Filings Two & Four, FDP150015, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for
your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may
contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at
970-221-6754 or pwray@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray(cDfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 05/15/2015
05/15/2015: Based on Engineering revisions a 2nd two week round of review is
needed. Please coordinate with DR Office to submit materials.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/12/2015
05/12/2015: See site plan comment above on trail connection realignment.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 05/12/2015
05/12/2015: Per site visit discussion, the 8' concrete trail connecting to Filing 3 will
be realigned to connect to Bon Homme Richard Drive sidewalk - timing of this
change will be reflected pre mylars.
Contact: Todd Vedder, 970-224-6152, tvedder(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 04/23/2015
04/23/2015: Please coordinate transformer locations with Light and Power @
221-6700. Transformers must be placed within 10 feet of solid surface for
installation and maintenance purposes. An 8' frontal and 3' side and back clearance
must be maintained for these transformers
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 04/23/2015
04/23/2015: Please coordinate and identify meter locations on utility drawing. Light
and Power prefers to have the electrical meters banked on multifamily units and on
opposite sides of the builiding from gas meters.
Page 1 of 6