Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHADELAND TOWNHOMES - PDP - 17-98 - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)It 9. There should be a central trash collection area, in an enclosure, for this project. The opportunity for recycling should be included in the enclosure. 10. Glen Schlueter of the Stormwater Utility offered the following comments: a. This site is located in the Spring Creek Basin, where the new basin development fees are $2,175 per acre. The fees are subject to the runoff coefficient reduction. b. Unless the site can drain into East Prospect Road, off -site easements must be in place or obtained from other property owners before approval of your request could be given. The storm sewer in East Prospect Road can be used but a manhole would be required at the point of tie-in. C. Letters of intent (from affected property owners) for any necessary off -site easements are required with the initial preliminary submittal and the signed easements are required with the first final submittal. The easements can be contingent on project approval. d. Site grading and existing drainage patterns are usually more difficult on infill sites like this. Grading contours (to a minimum of) 50' outside of the property are critical to address how the site will work. e. The standard drainage and erosion control plans and reports are required and they must be prepared by an engineer registered in Colorado. Please contact Glen, at 221-6589, if you have questions about these comments. 11. The age of the existing house is critical because the elimination of it may be subject to the City's demolition ordinance. Please contact Karen McWilliams in the Advance Planning Department for information on the ordinance. Karen can be reached at 224-6078. 12. A neighborhood information meeting is required for this development proposal and the meeting must be held prior to formal submiittal of a request for review. Please contact Steve Olt, at 221-6750, for assistance in scheduling the time and place for this meeting. e. Bicycle racks, providing adequate parking for the 6 living units, should be provided in convenient and secure locations. f. Curb and gutter (preferably) or curb stops should be provided in the parking areas. Please contact Gary, at 221-6760, if you have questions about these comments. 5. Roger Buffington of the WaterlWastewater Department offered the following comments: a. There are existing 12" water and 6" sanitary sewer mains in East Prospect Road. If a 6" sanitary sewer service is proposed for this development, then a manhole must be installed at the point of connection to the 6" sewer main. b. The City's water conservation standards for landscaping and irrigation systems will apply to this development. The landscape standards must be included on the Landscape Plan submittal for review and the irrigation standards will be part of the building plan submittal for permits. C. Plant investment fees and water rights will apply and they will be due at the time of issuance of building permits or, if an affordable housing project, in accordance with the delayed payment provisions for that program. Please contact Roger, at 221-6681, if you have questions about these comments. 6. Sharon Getz of the Building Inspection Department stated that there is a required number of handicapped accessible units that must be provided in accordance with the Building Code and a local amendment. There is also a requirement for handicapped parking provisions. Please contact Sharon, at 221- 6760, if you have questions. 7. There will be two different parkland fees associated with this development if there is residential to be included. The fees for neighborhood parks is based on the type (single family or multi -family) and square footage of the units. The fees for community parks is also based on the square footage of the units and is included in the City's recently adopted Capital Improvements Expansion Fees. 8. Existing vegetation on the site must be shown on the Site and Landscape Plans for this project. The plans must indicate if the plants are to remain or be removed. Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, should be consulted about the value of existing vegetation. b. The property is apparently part of the Holzinger Subdivision. This should be verified, because before this development can occur the property must be subdivided, if it is not already. C. Street oversizing fees of $554 per dwelling unit, for multi -family residential, will apply and the fees will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits. d. Surface storm water cannot drain across sidewalks. It must be channelized or directed into street gutter systems, if allowed. e. The standard utility plan requirements will apply and the plans must be submitted to the City for review and approval. Please contact Mike, at 221-6750, if you have questions about these comments. 4. Gary Lopez of the Zoning Department offered the following comments: a. The property is currently in the RL - Low Density Zoning District. If this development request were submitted prior to March'28, 1997, it would have to be processed and reviewed as a planned unit development (PUD) because multi -family (6-plex) is not a permitted use in the District. The request would be subject to a review against the All Development Criteria and the Residential Uses Density Chart in the Land Development Guidance System, and it would go to the Planning and Zoning Board for a final decision. If the ongoing City Plan and Land Use Code implementation holds true to form and is adopted by City Council on March 18, 1997, this property will be in the newly created LMN - Low Density Mixed Use Neighborhood District, effective March 28, 1997. Multi -family housing up to 6 dwelling units would be a permitted Type I use in the District, subject to an administrative review and public hearing before the Planning Director. b. All buildings must be set back a minimum of 14' from the front property line (in this case, the East Prospect Road south right-of-way line) in the LMN District. C. The parking area is subject to the requirements as set forth in the City's Parking Code. A landscape strip is required adjacent to all drives. d. The amount of proposed parking appears to be in compliance with the required number of spaces, based on the number of bedrooms shown in each of the 6 living units. �n vtC CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS City of Fort Collins MEETING DATE: January 27, 1997 ITEM: Residential 6-plex at 517-1/2 East Prospect Road APPLICANT: Jim Kline Fort Collins Housing Authority 1715 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80521 LAND USE DATA: Request for a 2-story, 6-plex residential building, containing 2 2-bedroom and 4 3- bedroom living units, on approximately 0.45 acre located on the south side of East Prospect Road between Whedbee and Smith Streets. The property is in the RL - Low Density Residential Zoning District. COMMENTS: Alan Rutz of the Light & Power Department offered the following comments a. There will be electric development charges assessed on this project. If there are necessary systems modifications because of this development, then there would be additional charges. b. Necessary on -site and off -site utility easements must be provided with this development. Please contact Alan, at 221-6700, if you have questions about these comments. 2. Roger Frasco of the Poudre Fire Authority stated that there is no access for fire apparatus, as shown on the concept plan; therefore, the building will have to be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system. A 2" water line for the sprinkler system should be sufficient, and it should be separate from the domestic water supply. 3. Mike Herzig of the Engineering Department offered the following comments: a. What pedestrian improvements exist along East Prospect Road? This development must construct sidewalk along its street frontage if one does not exist. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, C080522-0580 (970) 221-h7;o PLANNING DEPARTMENT Communiq Planning and Environmental 5 vices Current Planning City of Fort Collins February 3, 1997 Jim Kline Fort Collins Housing Authority 1715 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80521 Dear Jim, 29 23�4 j l w For your information, attached is a copy of the Staffs comments concerning the request for a Residential 6-plex at 517-1/2 East Prospect Road, which was presented before the Conceptual Review Team on January 27, 1997. This is a request for Request for a 2-story, 6-plex residential building, containing 2 2- bedroom and 4 3-bedroom living units, on approximately 0.45 acre located on the south side of East Prospect Road between Whedbee and Smith Streets. The property is in the RL - Low Density Residential Zoning District. The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the detailed components of the project application. Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project. If you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6750. 4ev erely, e Olt Project Planner xc: Stormwater Utility/Glen Schlueter Streets/Eric Bracke File 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collin , CO 80522-0380 • (970) 221-6750 FAX (970) 221-6378 • TDD (970 224-6002