HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHADELAND TOWNHOMES - PDP - 17-98 - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)It
9. There should be a central trash collection area, in an enclosure, for this project.
The opportunity for recycling should be included in the enclosure.
10. Glen Schlueter of the Stormwater Utility offered the following comments:
a. This site is located in the Spring Creek Basin, where the new basin
development fees are $2,175 per acre. The fees are subject to the runoff
coefficient reduction.
b. Unless the site can drain into East Prospect Road, off -site easements
must be in place or obtained from other property owners before approval
of your request could be given. The storm sewer in East Prospect Road
can be used but a manhole would be required at the point of tie-in.
C. Letters of intent (from affected property owners) for any necessary off -site
easements are required with the initial preliminary submittal and the
signed easements are required with the first final submittal. The
easements can be contingent on project approval.
d. Site grading and existing drainage patterns are usually more difficult on
infill sites like this. Grading contours (to a minimum of) 50' outside of the
property are critical to address how the site will work.
e. The standard drainage and erosion control plans and reports are required
and they must be prepared by an engineer registered in Colorado.
Please contact Glen, at 221-6589, if you have questions about these comments.
11. The age of the existing house is critical because the elimination of it may be
subject to the City's demolition ordinance. Please contact Karen McWilliams in
the Advance Planning Department for information on the ordinance. Karen can
be reached at 224-6078.
12. A neighborhood information meeting is required for this development proposal
and the meeting must be held prior to formal submiittal of a request for review.
Please contact Steve Olt, at 221-6750, for assistance in scheduling the time and
place for this meeting.
e. Bicycle racks, providing adequate parking for the 6 living units, should be
provided in convenient and secure locations.
f. Curb and gutter (preferably) or curb stops should be provided in the
parking areas.
Please contact Gary, at 221-6760, if you have questions about these comments.
5. Roger Buffington of the WaterlWastewater Department offered the following
comments:
a. There are existing 12" water and 6" sanitary sewer mains in East Prospect
Road. If a 6" sanitary sewer service is proposed for this development,
then a manhole must be installed at the point of connection to the 6"
sewer main.
b. The City's water conservation standards for landscaping and irrigation
systems will apply to this development. The landscape standards must be
included on the Landscape Plan submittal for review and the irrigation
standards will be part of the building plan submittal for permits.
C. Plant investment fees and water rights will apply and they will be due at
the time of issuance of building permits or, if an affordable housing
project, in accordance with the delayed payment provisions for that
program.
Please contact Roger, at 221-6681, if you have questions about these
comments.
6. Sharon Getz of the Building Inspection Department stated that there is a
required number of handicapped accessible units that must be provided in
accordance with the Building Code and a local amendment. There is also a
requirement for handicapped parking provisions. Please contact Sharon, at 221-
6760, if you have questions.
7. There will be two different parkland fees associated with this development if
there is residential to be included. The fees for neighborhood parks is based on
the type (single family or multi -family) and square footage of the units. The fees
for community parks is also based on the square footage of the units and is
included in the City's recently adopted Capital Improvements Expansion Fees.
8. Existing vegetation on the site must be shown on the Site and Landscape Plans
for this project. The plans must indicate if the plants are to remain or be
removed. Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, should be consulted about the value
of existing vegetation.
b. The property is apparently part of the Holzinger Subdivision. This should
be verified, because before this development can occur the property must
be subdivided, if it is not already.
C. Street oversizing fees of $554 per dwelling unit, for multi -family
residential, will apply and the fees will be collected at the time of issuance
of building permits.
d. Surface storm water cannot drain across sidewalks. It must be
channelized or directed into street gutter systems, if allowed.
e. The standard utility plan requirements will apply and the plans must be
submitted to the City for review and approval.
Please contact Mike, at 221-6750, if you have questions about these comments.
4. Gary Lopez of the Zoning Department offered the following comments:
a. The property is currently in the RL - Low Density Zoning District. If this
development request were submitted prior to March'28, 1997, it would
have to be processed and reviewed as a planned unit development (PUD)
because multi -family (6-plex) is not a permitted use in the District. The
request would be subject to a review against the All Development Criteria
and the Residential Uses Density Chart in the Land Development
Guidance System, and it would go to the Planning and Zoning Board for a
final decision.
If the ongoing City Plan and Land Use Code implementation holds true to
form and is adopted by City Council on March 18, 1997, this property will
be in the newly created LMN - Low Density Mixed Use Neighborhood
District, effective March 28, 1997. Multi -family housing up to 6 dwelling
units would be a permitted Type I use in the District, subject to an
administrative review and public hearing before the Planning Director.
b. All buildings must be set back a minimum of 14' from the front property
line (in this case, the East Prospect Road south right-of-way line) in the
LMN District.
C. The parking area is subject to the requirements as set forth in the City's
Parking Code. A landscape strip is required adjacent to all drives.
d. The amount of proposed parking appears to be in compliance with the
required number of spaces, based on the number of bedrooms shown in
each of the 6 living units.
�n vtC
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS
City of Fort Collins
MEETING DATE: January 27, 1997
ITEM: Residential 6-plex at 517-1/2 East Prospect Road
APPLICANT: Jim Kline
Fort Collins Housing Authority
1715 West Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80521
LAND USE DATA:
Request for a 2-story, 6-plex residential building, containing 2 2-bedroom and 4 3-
bedroom living units, on approximately 0.45 acre located on the south side of East
Prospect Road between Whedbee and Smith Streets. The property is in the RL - Low
Density Residential Zoning District.
COMMENTS:
Alan Rutz of the Light & Power Department offered the following comments
a. There will be electric development charges assessed on this project. If
there are necessary systems modifications because of this development,
then there would be additional charges.
b. Necessary on -site and off -site utility easements must be provided with this
development.
Please contact Alan, at 221-6700, if you have questions about these comments.
2. Roger Frasco of the Poudre Fire Authority stated that there is no access for fire
apparatus, as shown on the concept plan; therefore, the building will have to be
equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system. A 2" water line for the sprinkler
system should be sufficient, and it should be separate from the domestic water
supply.
3. Mike Herzig of the Engineering Department offered the following comments:
a. What pedestrian improvements exist along East Prospect Road? This
development must construct sidewalk along its street frontage if one does
not exist.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, C080522-0580 (970) 221-h7;o
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Communiq Planning and Environmental 5 vices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
February 3, 1997
Jim Kline
Fort Collins Housing Authority
1715 West Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80521
Dear Jim,
29 23�4 j
l w
For your information, attached is a copy of the Staffs comments concerning the request
for a Residential 6-plex at 517-1/2 East Prospect Road, which was presented before
the Conceptual Review Team on January 27, 1997.
This is a request for Request for a 2-story, 6-plex residential building, containing 2 2-
bedroom and 4 3-bedroom living units, on approximately 0.45 acre located on the south
side of East Prospect Road between Whedbee and Smith Streets. The property is in
the RL - Low Density Residential Zoning District.
The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the detailed
components of the project application. Modifications and additions to these comments
may be made at the time of formal review of this project.
If you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the
review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6750.
4ev
erely,
e Olt
Project Planner
xc: Stormwater Utility/Glen Schlueter
Streets/Eric Bracke
File
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collin , CO 80522-0380 • (970) 221-6750
FAX (970) 221-6378 • TDD (970 224-6002