HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROSPECT INDUSTRIAL PARK, MIDPOINT SELF-STORAGE - PDP - 28-98D - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYhwZUUU: Signalizea
intersections
Release 4.1c
Analyst:
Michael
Inter.:
Timberline/Prospect
Agency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
Date:
3/26 03
Jurisd:
Fo
Period:
am pm,
Year
short range base w/projects
Project
ID: 327me01
E/W St:
Prospect
N/S St:
Timberline
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L T R
I
I L T R
I
I L T R
I L T
R 1
No. Lanes
I 1 2 0
i 1 2 0
I
I 1 1 0
I
I 1 1
I
1 I
LGConfig
I L TR
I L TR
I L TR
I L T
R I
Volume
1121 928 420
1448 997 78
1408 545 176
165 526
140 1
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0 I
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 0
1 0
1
0 I
Duration
0.25
Area
Type: All
other
areas
Signal
Operations
Phase Combination 1
2
3 4
1
5
6
7 8
EB Left
A
P
I NB
Left
A
A
A
Thru
P
I
Thru
A
A
Right
P
1
Right
A
A
Peds
X
1
Peds
X
WB Left
A
A
P
I SB
Left
A
A
Thru
A
P
I
Thru
A
Right
A
P
I
Right
A
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
NB Right
I EB
Right
SB Right
A
I WB
Right
Green
4.0
14.0
48.0
4.0
15.0
35.0
Yellow
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
All Red
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 178 1770 0.75 0.42 56.9 E
TR 1246 3374 1.19 0.37 134.5 F 128.1 F
Westbound
L 316
1770
1.53
0.52
293.9
F
TR 1670
3501
0.69
0.48
27.8
C 106.1 F
Northbound
L 329
1770
1.26
0.42
180.9
F
TR 690
1794
1.07
0.38
93.4
F 125.0 F
Southbound
L 125
1770
0.61
0.32
44.2
D
T 502
1863
1.23
0.27
168.8
F 131.5 F
R 536
1583
0.31
0.34
32.1
C
Intersection
Delay
= 121.1
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = F
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
secs
mu,izuuu: �iignaiizea intersections nelease 4.1c
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date: R 26/03
Period: am pm
Project ID: 0327me01
E/W St: Prospect
Inter.: Timberline/Prospect
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fo t Collins
Year short range base w/project
N/S St: Timberline
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L T R
I
I L T R
I L T R
I L T
R i
No. Lanes
I
I
I 1 1 0
I
I 1 1
I
1 I
I 1 2 0
I 1 2 0
LGConfig
I L TR
I L TR
I L TR
I L T
R I
Volume
1104 933 310
1414 872 35
1449 392 242
1110 368
141 1
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0 1
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 0
1 0
1
0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8
EB Left A P I NB Left A A A
Thru P I Thru A A
Right P I Right A A
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A P I SB Left A A
Thru P I Thru A
Right P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right A i WB Right
Green 14.0 51.0 4.0 21.0 30.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 265
1770
0.46
0.51
24.5
C
TR 1337
3407
1.09
0.39
94.1
F 88.7 F
Westbound
L 261
1770
1.84
0.51
435.2
F
TR 1381
3519
0.76
0.39
38.3
D 162.6 F
Northbound
L 411
1770
1.28
0.43
185.1
F
TR 689
1756
1.08
0.39
98.4
F 134.3 F
Southbound
L 125 1770 1.03 0.28 134.7 F
T 430 1863 1.01 0.23 95.2 F 86.9 F
R 597 1583 0.28 0.38 28.4 C
Intersection Delay = 122.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
APPENDIX B
riC n1/UVV: J1911d11ZeU 111Ce L'SeCa1V115 MeleLtSe 4.1(:
Analyst:
Michael
Inter.:
Timberline/Prospect
Agency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type: All other areas
Date:
3/26103
Jurisd:
Fo oll'
Period:
am®
Year
short range base condition
Project
ID: 0327me01
E/W St:
Prospect
N/S St:
Timberline
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L T R
I
I L T R
I L T R
I L T
R I
No. Lanes
i
I
1 1 1 0
I
1 1 1
I
1 1
1 1 2 0
1 1 2 0
LGConfig
I L TR
I L TR
I L TR
I L T
R I
Volume
1121 926 420
1439 997 78
1406 545 176
165 526
140 I
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0 I
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 0
1 0
1
0 I
Duration
0.25
Area
Type: All
other
areas
Signal
Operations
Phase Combination 1
2
3 4
1
5
6
7 8
EB Left
A
P
I NB
Left
A
A
A
Thru
P
I
Thru
A
A
Right
P
I
Right
A
A
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
WB Left
A
A
P
I SB
Left
A
A
Thru
A
P
I
Thru
A
Right
A
P
I
Right
A
Peds
X
I
Peds
X
NB Right
1 EB
Right
SB Right
A
I WB
Right
Green
4.0
14.0
48.0
4.0
15.0
35.0
Yellow
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
All Red
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
Cycle
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Length: 130.0 secs
Approach
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 178 1770 0.75 0.42 56.9 E
TR 1245 3373 1.19 0.37 134.2 F 127.9 F
Westbound
L 316 1770 1.49 0.52 280.2 F
TR 1670 3501 0.69 0.48 27.8 C 101.0 F
Northbound
L
329
1770
1.26
0.42
178.4
F
TR
690
1794
1.07
0.38
93.4
F 124.0 F
Southbound
L
125
1770
0.61
0.32
44.2
D
T
502
1863
1.23
0.27
168.8
F 131.5 F
R
536
1583
0.31
0.34
32.1
C
Intersection Delay
= 119.3
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = F
HCS20O0: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
au6z uuu: Signalizea intersections me -Lease a.iu
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date: 3426/03
Period: am pm
Project ID: 0327me01
E/W St: Prospect
Inter.: Timberline/Prospect
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort_Collins
Year hort range base condition
NIS St: Timberline
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound 1
I L T R
I
I L T R
I L T R
I L T
R 1
No. Lanes
I
I
I
I
1 I
I 1 2 0
I 1 2 0
I 1 1 0
( 1 1
LGConfig
I L TR
I L TR
I L TR
I L T
R 1
Volume
1104 932 310
1412 872 35
1448 392 242
I110 368
141
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
12.0 I
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 0
1 0
1
0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4( 5 6 7 8
EB Left A P 1 NB Left A A A
Thru P I Thru A A
Right P 1 Right A A
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A P I SB Left A A
Thru P 1 Thru A
Right P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right A I WB Right
Green 14.0 51.0 4.0 21.0 30.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 265 1770 0.46 0.51 24.5 C
TR 1337 3407 1.09 0.39 93.5 F 88.2 F
Westbound
L
261
1770
1.84
0.51
431.8
F
TR
1381
3519
0.76
0.39
38.3
D 161.2 F
Northbound
L
411
1770
1.28
0.43
184.1
F
TR
689
1756
1.08
0.39
98.4
F 133.9 F
Southbound
L
125
1770
1.03
0.28
134.7
F
T
430
1863
1.01
0.23
95.2
F 86.9 F
R
597
1583
0.28
0.38
28.4
C
Intersection
Delay
= 121.2
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = F
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@fr.ii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
APPENDIX A
m
E
35/78
872/997
412/439
104/121 --J
932/926 —►
310/420
SHORT RANGE (2006) BASE
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Prospect
+-- AM/PM
A&
N
Figure 3
'&
N
E
O co
W-Y N U')
o
q1tCo
I� CO
35/78
+-- 872/997
414/448
1041121
Prospect
933/928 —
00 to
310/420
to
v v
m
-■— AM/PM
SHORT RANGE (2006) BASE PLUS MIDPOINT Figure 4
SELF STORAGE PHASE 2 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
0 14t
0 c0
v uO
co
T N
CO M
JIB.
97/112
786/820
283/368
9-
27/61
801 /910
327/327
t r
L
Cn
rn rn
T 00
Cn T
--a* — AM/PM
Prospect
A&
N
RECENT (11/01) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2
TABLE I
rip Generation
1, 4� -4111-YT 104 151 Self Storage 43.5 KSF 2.50 110 0.09 4 0.06 1 3 1 0.13 6 0.13 6
TABLE
Short Range (2006) Base Condition
Peak Hour
LOS
Delay
Morning
F
121.2 secs.
Afternoon
F
119.3 secs.
TABLE
Short Range 2006) Base Condition Plus Midpoint Self S orage, Phase 2.
Peak Hour
LOS
Delay
Increase in Delay
Morning
F
122.0 secs.
0.7%
Afternoon
F
121.1 secs.
1.5%
A&
N
FORT
COLLINS
DOWNTOWN
AIRPARK
SH14
Prospect Rd.
Midpoint
v
a>
iE
Midpoint
E
Self Storage
~
eG
0
Drake Rd.
°Pry
SCALE: 1"=2000'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
shown in Figure 4. Table 3 shows the intersection level of service and
delay using the volumes shown in Figure 3. Calculation forms are provided
in Appendix B. The increase in delay is 0.7 percent and 1.5 percent in the
respective peak hours. Based upon this analysis, it is concluded that
Midpoint Self Storage, Phase 2 will meet the APF criteria at the
Prospect/Timberline intersection.
CD
co
LO
Co
OD
�
TO: Darren Zethren, DCB Construction
'
LO
City of Fort Colli(n�s(s
o
�D
(Z
cD
FROM: Matt Delich
J
O
�
rn
U
DATE: March 26, 2003
•
o
X
LL
SUBJECT: Midpoint Self Storage, Phase 2 Adequate Public Facilities
j
Analysis (File: 0327ME01)
w
O
J
•
Midpoint Self Storage, Phase 2 is the continuing development
w
CD
of a self storage (mini -warehouse) facility within the Prospect East
>_
cov
�
Business Park. Figure 1 shows the location of the Midpoint Self
p
rn
CD
Storage property. Midpoint Self Storage, Phase 1 is built and
z
T
occupied. Phase 2 is for 43,500 square feet of self storage. The
w
a
or--
trip generation for Phase 2 is shown in Table 1. Because of the low
S
rn
trip generation, a detailed traffic impact study is not required.
w
i.i
However, because there are existing operational concerns regarding
othe
Prospect/Timberline intersection, staff requested an adequate
N
p
public facilities (APF) analysis. This memorandum addresses the APF
1�
issues at the Prospect/Timberline intersection for Midpoint Self
N
Storage, Phase 2. The transportation impact study guidelines
indicate that significant impact is defined in Section 4.5.2.A.2 in
the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards," as follows: "When
the background traffic conditions (without project traffic) causes
an intersection to fail the minimum acceptable level of service
standards; and when the project traffic causes more than a 2 percent
increase in the intersection delay."
The analyses contained in this memorandum use recent traffic
counts (supplied by the City) dated November 2001. These traffic
counts are shown in Figure 2. These counts indicate that the
W
Prospect/Timberline intersection is operating at level of service F
during both hours
peak with the existing geometry.
a
Z
Since improvements to this intersection are not on a capital
Fr
improvement program, this APF analysis included existing traffic
Zfactored
to the year 2006 at 1.5 percent per year, plus
V
(5
known/approved projects that impact the subject intersection. These
Z
projects are: Rigden Farm 60 Filing, Spring Creek Center, Midpoint
J
LIJ
Self Storage Phase 1, and Centerpoint Plaza Building A. the base
j� �0
Z
(2006) peak hour traffic at the Prospect/Timberline intersection is
Q
F
shown in Figure 3. The APF analysis must use the existing geometry
¢
at the subject intersection. Table 2 shows the intersection level
a
of service and delay using the volumes shown in Figure 3. Calculation
z
forms are provided in Appendix A. Clearly, this intersection will
a
cc
operate unacceptably with the existing geometry. In order to meet
H
the APF criteria, the delay at the Prospect/Timberline intersection
W
03
could not exceed 123.6 seconds and 121.6 seconds in the respective
0
peak hours. These values reflect a 2 percent increase in delay at
LL
this intersection with the current geometry.
The calculated trip generation was assigned to the Prospect/
C
G
Timberline intersection. The forecasted (2006) peak hour volumes are