The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPROSPECT INDUSTRIAL PARK, LOT 19 - PDP - 28-98E - CORRESPONDENCE -If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Atk� Steve Olt City Planner cc: Randy Maizland Interwest Consulting Group Current Planning file #28-98E Page 7 Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 25 Created: 1 / 16/2007 [ 1 / 16/07] OK for preliminary. More detail required at final. Number: 29 Created: 1 / 18/ 2007 [ 1 / 18/ 07] Some thoughts for final compliance: Check sewer televising records for info on sewer service location. Add a detail on reducing size of water service (we have one that should work). Revise fire line and water service where they turn and go into bldg so that domestic service is not behind thrust block on fire line. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: Zoning Number: 1 Created: 1 / 3 / 2007 [ 1 / 3 / 07] 3.2.1(E) (2) (d) Foundation plantings are required on the easterly side of the building Number: 2 Created: 1 / 3 / 2007 [ 1 / 3 / 07] Note - Van accessible parking space needs a sign stating that it is van accessible Number: 3 Created: 1 / 3 / 2007 [ 1 / 3 /.07] I don't see a bike rack called out anywhere on the site plan - please review and show location Number: 4 Created: 1 / 3 / 2007 [ 1 / 3 / 07] I don't seea trash enclosure location yet there is reference one in the general notes... please review. This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time. Red -lined plans from City departments are included with this comment letter. Another formal round of staff review is not necessary before scheduling and going to an administrative public hearing. However, either a reylat_of the lot or the necessary easements to be dedicated by separate documents must be submitted for review before the hearing can be scheduled. The majority of the comments expressed in this letter can be addressed with your Final Compliance submittal. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you submit Final Compliance. The number of copies of each document to submit for Final Compliance will be provided to you by the City's Project Planner, upon request. Page 6 Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 23 Created: 1 / 16/ 2007 [1/ 16/071 FIRE LANE: PFA requires an emergency access easement to ensure vehicles are not parked in such a way that obstructs access to the north side of the proposed building, as well as access to the future warehouse/storage. This EAE can be platted along approximately the first 100 feet of the drive aisle into the parking lot, and as such, won't require a turnaround. Number: 24 Created: 1 / 16/ 2007 [ 1 / 16/ 07] FDC: The fire department connection for the automatic fire sprinklers shall be mounted remote from the building, in a location easily accessible from either the fire lane or public street. Per our discussion, the FDC may be located on the south side of the office building, in closer proximity to the fire hydrant on Midpoint Drive. Number: 28 [1/ 17/07] . Created: 1 / 17/2007 Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Stormwater Number: 26 Created: 1 / 16 / 2007 [ 1 / 16/ 07] The area covered by the detention pond area up to the 100 year elevation should be dedicated as a drainage easement. Letters of intent for the grading shown on Lot 18 and potentially Lot 20 are needed prior to hearing. Easements would be needed at final. Number: 27 Created: 1 / 16 / 2007 [ 1 / 16/ 07] Please state in the text portion of the report that the release rate from the detention pond was set at the two year historic site. Please clarify how detention requirements are being satisfied with the street flows being undetained. Please make sure that the pipe crossing the *entrance driveway will be strong enough to handle HS 20 loading. Clarify that the minimum opening elevation will be set at 1 foot above 100- year surface elevation. Specify the spillway elevation on the detail shown. Plans are OK for a preliminary, from Stormwater's perspective this item can proceed to hearing once letter(s) of intent are submitted. Page 5 Number: 12 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [ 1 / 9 / 07] Show and label all structures and improvements within 150 feet of the site boundary per LCUASS Appendix E requirements. Number: 13 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [1/9/07] All easement and ROW dedication documents must be submitted for first review with review fees paid prior to scheduling a Type 1 hearing for the project. The fee is $250 per document and shall include signed deeds of dedication and legal descriptions stamped by a licensed surveyor. Referenced reception numbers will need to be provided at final compliance plan submittal. Number: 14 Created: 1 / 9 /2007 [1/9/07] Please add the standard note for repair of damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk to the Utility Plan sheet. Note attached to red -lines. Number: 15 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [ 1 / 9 / 07] Please show how the new detached sidewalk connects to an existing sidewalk to the east if one exists. Number: 16 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [1/9/07] Clearly label or legend the approximate limits of street cut for the sewer connection on Midpoint. Number: 17 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [ 1 / 9 / 07] Please remove the 2 foot concrete drainage pan from the existing utility easement along the north side of the property. Number: 18 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [1/9/07] Provide the following standard typical details: 1..2 foot concrete drainage pan. 2. LCUASS standard high volume drive approach 3. Sidewalk culvert - sidewalk chase drain 4. LCUASS concrete sidewalk detail 5. Detail for 6 inch on -site curb & gutter Number: 19 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [1/9/07] Please use slightly heavier line type for existing topo on the Grading Plan so that it will copy well. Number: 20 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [1/9/07] Add the standard statement regarding foundation elevations, section II.E. from LCUASS Appendix E to the Grading Plan sheet. Number: 21 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [1/9/07] See minor comments on Site Plan red -line. Page 4 Number: 34 Created: 1 / 18/2007 [1/ 18/07] The standard landscape assurance note, per Section 3.2.1(I)(4) of the Land Use Code, must be added to the Landscape Plan. Topic: Utilities Number: 30 Created: 1/ 18/2007 [ 1 / 18 / 07] Len Hilderbrand of Xcel Energy indicated that they have a 2" gas main located on the southwest side of Midpoint Drive. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 5 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [1/9/07] The PDP review fee was underpaid by $215. The acreage cost was not calculated at $250 x 0.86 acres. This $215 will be collected at final compliance plan submittal. See copy of TDRF fee calc. sheet attached to redlines. Number: 6 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [ 1 / 9 / 071 Variance no. 1 for parking setback is not approved. Justification is not adequate for approval. Please see comments on variance request attached to red -lines. Number: 7 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [1/9/07] Variance no. 2 is approved for driveway separation distances. Number: 8 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [1/9/07] Please provide LCUASS Appendix E General Notes and Construction Notes in the Utility Plan set. General Notes are typically shown on the cover sheet or sheet 2. Please include benchmark information, geotechnical reference and variance information in the General Notes. Revise the sheet index if needed. Number: 9 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [ 1 / 9 / 07] Please add a standard revision block to all sheets in the title block section on the right side TYP. Number: 10 Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 [ 1 / 9 / 07] Please add the geotechnical engineer's information in the consultants section on the cover sheet. Add the month and year under the title and legal description on the cover sheet. Number: 11 1 Created: 1/9/2007 [1/9/07] Please label all existing items being shown on the Utility Plan sheet. Use labeling or legend line types consistently. Page 3 d. The variance request for the parking setback from Midpoint Drive was not approved. Poudre Fire Authority/ Carie Dann a. A fire hydrant must be located within 100' of the fire sprinkler connection for the building. b. A fire lane must be designated and dedicated on the plat for the 24' wide driveway between Midpoint Drive and the Vehicle Staging & Maneuvering Area. Stormwater/Basil Hamdan a. Dedicate a drainage easement for the 100-year water surface area. b. The drainage report should better state the storm drainage intent for this project. c. A letter of intent is needed, before scheduling a public hearing, for the off -site easement on Lot 20, to the southeast. Transportation Planning/David Averill a. A Type III barricade is needed at the end of the new sidewalk at the southeast corner of the site. Current Planning/ Steve Olt a. A replat of Lot 19, providing all the necessary easements, could be submitted to the City for review and approval in lieu of the various separate documents to dedicate these easements. There would be no additional fee to the City for the replat. It would just become one of the typical PDP documents to be reviewed. Topic: Landscaping Number: 32 Created: 1 / 18/2007 [ 1 / 18/ 07] A copy of the comments received from Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, is attached to this comment letter. Number: 33 Created: 1 / 18 / 2007 [ 1 / 18/ 07] Additional landscaping must be included in the landscape islands that separate the parking area from the larger Vehicle Staging & Maneuvering Area to provide screening of that large area from Midpoint Drive. Page 2 Eastpoint Studio LLC c/o Don Brookshire 552 Kinnikinnik Court Windsor CO 80550 Date: 01 / 18/ 2007 i Staff has reviewed your submittal for HOLSINGER DRYWALL, PROSPECT INDUSTRIAL PARK, LOT 19 - PDP (TYPE 1), and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Building Number: 31 Created: 1 / 18 / 2007 [ 1 / 18/ 07] Rick Lee of the Building Department indicated that he is forwarding to the applicant a copy of the Codes and Standards that the Building Department will enforce. Please note that a Pre -submittal Code Review Meeting is required before submitting for a building permit. Department: Advance Planning Topic: Engineering Number: 22 [1/9/07] No comment. Issue Contact: Pete Wray Created: 1 / 9 / 2007 Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: General Number: 35 Created: l / 18 / 2007 [1/ 18/07] If there is to be any fencing for this development the location(s) must be shown on the Site 8v Landscape Plans and a detail for the fencing design must be provided on one of the development plans. Number: 36 Created: 1 / 18 / 2007 [1/ 18/07] The following comments were expressed at staff review on Wednesday, January 17, 2007: Engineering/Randy Maizland a. The Transportation Development Review Fee (TDRF) paid at time of PDP submittal is $215 short of what should have been paid. That amount will be added to the TDRF paid at time of Final Compliance submittal. b. The standard general notes on utility plans must be added. d. Standard details on the utility plans must be provided. Page 1