Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOURTYARD COMMONS - PDP - 38-98 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEW13. LUC states that secondary uses shall occupy no more than 25-0 of the total gross area of t e eve o ment Ian'. ivi7 of the LUC empowers the j i3a'dRi to grant modifications to the istrict Standards of Article 4 for project 1) development plans. This division of.the Code sets forth the requirements for submitting a modification request. A neighborhood meeting will be required to be held for this development proposal prior to formal submittal of the request (Section 2.2.2 of the LUC). Please con ac eve of the Current Planning Department to assist you in scheduling this meeting. He can be reached at 221- 1. This development request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Planning Department o ice. The fees are ue at the ti - su mi -a-of the require ocumen s or the Overall Development Plan, Project Development Plan, and Final Compliance phases of development review by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies. 14. This development proposal is subject to the re irements as set forth in the City's LUC, sI" cifically Articles 2. Administration (De�Zo�ninq Review Procedures) 3. lSeneral Development tan ards, anDistricts. heir a als�u mitta requirements for each phase of review that must be met, and copies of these requirements are available in the Current Planning Department. 7. Susie Gordon of the Natural Resources Department stated that this appears to be an interesting, innovative project. The question is, how will you get the trash/garbage trucks into the site and to the trash collection areas? 8. Basil Hamdan of the Stormwater Utility offered the following comments: a. This site is located within the McClellands/Mail Creek Basin, where the fees are $3,717 per acre and that is based on the amount of impervious area. Tars si e'is also located within inventory grid #80. b. Detention needs to be provided on -site. It could be done as part of the existing detention pond on Tract A (on the conceptual plan) as long as this increase as een accounted for. This is part of the Heart Special Improvement District. The release rate is 0.87 cfs/acre. C. Off -site flows from the southwest (proposed commercial site) should be accommodated for and routed through this site.. d. �ater quality should be addressed for this development. This could be one in the existing detention pond on Tract A by adding an extended detention feature. Please see Section 3.4.3 of the City's LUC. e. The Larimer No. 2 Canal Company will have to sign the utility plans since\ this si a drains into their canal. \ Please contact Basil, at 221-6589, if you have questions about these comments. 9. Kathleen Reavis of the Transportation Planning Department offered the following comments: a. The required Traffic Impact Study must address on -site and off -site multi - modal trips and access to this site (vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, transit). b. Pedestrian c000pctions should be provided to all neighboring properties. C. Identifiable pedestrian crossings on adjacent streets must be addressed. 10. Clark Mapes of the Advance Planning Department stated that the residential buildings must face the sidewalks and provide direct pedestrian access to the e nes from t o surroun ing wa n o e UC pertaining to Residential Building Standards. 11. As previously stated in Item 4, above, residential uses are permitted in the E - Employment Di Lct subject to review by the Planninq_and Zoninq Board (Type as set forth in Section 4.22(B)(3) of the LUC . o�wevv& .the proposed residential use is a "secondary use" in the E District. Section 4.22(D)(1) of the NA r� 4. Peter Barnes of the Zoning Department stated that the prFerty is located in the E - Employment Zoning District. Residential uses are permitted in the E District, subject to review by the Planning and Zoning Board (Type II), as set forth in ec ion (3) of the Land Use Code {LUC) . The proposed residential use i§ a "secouse" in the E District. Section 4.22(D)(1) of the CCrJ states t at econdary uses shall occupy no more than 25_ %of the total gross area of the development plan. Also, the proposed 3-story buildings are allowed in the E District, as set forth in �G L Section 4.22(D)(2)e(a) of the LUC. This is a maximum height for residential buildings. 5. Roger Buffington of the Water/Wastewater Department offered the following comments: a. There is an existing $"water -main in JFK Parkway and an existing 12" water main in Landings Drive. b. There is an existing 8" sani ary sewer _maiosorth and east of this site, across the Larimer No. 2 Canal in the Wharf Condominium project. c. Sanitary sewer must be extended through this proposed development to the area of the future commercial development to the southwest. A 30, wide (minimum) utility easement for the sewer must be provided. d. Extend a water main through the site and connecI to the existing mains in JFK Parkway and Landings Drive. e. The City's Water Conservation Standards for landscaping and irrigation systems will apply to this development. Information on the standards is available in the Water Department and the Current Planning Department. f. Plant investment fees and water rights will apply to this development and they will be due at the time of issuance of building permits. Please contact Roger, at 221-6681, if you have questions about these comments. 6. Janet Meisel of the Parks Planning Department stated that variable parkland fees for multi -family residential will be assessed at the time of issuance of building permits. The fees are contained within the Capital Improvements Expansion Fees and are assessed for each dwelling unit. There are two fees, Community Parkland and Neighborhood Parkland, and they are based on the square footage of each unit. outside turning radius. This is to allow for emergency vehicle (fire truck) access. b. Some of the structures as shown on the conceptual plan may be out of access. All points on the exterior walls of tha hi t �s (at the ground floor level) must be within 150' of a location where a fire truck can access and park to fight a fire. C. Fire hydrants must be at 600' centers within the development. Please contact Ron, at 221-6570, if you have questions about these comments. 3 Michael Coley of the Engineering Department offered the following comments: i A Transp��t,.on_Impact Study is_..equired with your Project Development Plan PDP) submittal. Please contact Eric Bracke, at 221-6062, to schedule a "scoping" meeting to discuss the information needed in the analysis. b. Street and sidewalk improvements will be required for JFK Parkway and Landings Drive. The necessary improvements must be per City standards. C. Street oversizing-fees of $554 per dwelling unit for multi -family residential will apply to this development. The fees will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits. Possible modifications to the fees are going to City Council for review and approval sometime yet this year. If approved, the new fees will be based on vehicle trip generations by the development. � d. The standard utility plan requirements must be submitted to the City for review and approval. e. The maximum curb cut width is 35' for the drive access points at JFK Parkway and Landings Drive. If the internal drive is to be dedicated to the public, with right-of-way, then there may be questions about the alignment of the drive and the proposed curve radii. g. The conceptual plan shows two garage buildings to be used by this residential development as being accessed via future driveways in a proposed commercial center to the south. Off -site access easements for the garages would be required in this case. Please contact Michael, at 221-6750, if you have questions about these comments. CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS Cite of Fort Collins MEETING DATE: February 9, 1998 ITEM: Multi -Family Residential on the Schrader Property, North of the approved, developing Landings Office Park APPLICANT: Jon Prouty Lagunitas Company 3307 South College Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO. 80525 LAND USE DATA: Request for a multi -family residential development on approximately 3 acres located on the east side of JFK Parkway and the west side of Landings Drive, at the intersection with Bockman Drive. Horsetooth Road is to the north and Boardwalk Drive is to the south. This property is surrounded by the Wharf Condominiums to the north, the Landings Office Park to the south, ShopKo and Toys 'R' Us stores to the west, and the High Pointe single family residential neighborhood to the east. Conceptually, the proposal would contain 8 buildings with either 6 (48 total units) or 8 (64 total units) dwelling units per building. The buildings would be 3 stories in height and each unit would contain 2 or 3 bedrooms. The property is in the E - Employment Zoning District. COMMENTS: Bruce Vogel of the Light & Power Department offered the following comments: a. There is existing City power in both JFK Parkway and Landings Drive. b. Development along the internal "private" drive must be set back a minimum of 15' to allowfor power on both sides. C. The City will install and maintain the lighting along the internal drive if it is dedicated as a public street. Please contact Bruce, at 221-6700, if you have questions about these comments. 2. Ron Gonzales of the Poudre Fire Authority offered the following comments: a. The curves on the internal drive must provide for a 20' inside and a 40' COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. PO. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 15) Pedestrian access and flow on -site, through site, adjacent to site (Landings and JFK), parking access, garage access, street access, building access and open space access have been addressed. 16) Neighborhood meeting was held, as required, with full presentation of residential project, complimentary commercial project, potential alternatives, traffic considerations, character of neighborhood considerations and type of use considerations, as well as consideration of other matters. Courtyard Commons Conceptual Review Comments/Responses 1) Conceptual review occurred on February 9, 1998 at which time the initial residential and the future complimentary commercial (office) parts of the project were described. Subsequently applicant and staff (engineering and planning) determined that both the residential and commercial (office) parts of project should proceed at the same time since they are so inextricably intertwined. Accordingly, it was requested by applicant that conceptual review for the office part of project be waived to the extent that matters relating to same were not fully discussed at previous conceptual review and the director of planning and the project planner concluded that no additional conceptual review would be necessary. 2) Applicant will work with Light and Power to provide satisfactory easements. 3) All street curves, building access and fire hydrant location requirements have been met. 4) A Transportation Impact Study has been completed and is being submitted. 5) JFK and Landings sidewalks shall be installed. 6) Preliminary utility plan, Platte, site plan, landscape plan, building elevations and project cross section are being submitted. 7) Garages shall be accessed by common private drives (no easements through office part of project shall be required for access to residential garages). 8) JFK and Landings curb cut widths shall not exceed 35 feet. 9) A modification request is being submitted in support of residential uses for project in excess of 25%. 10) Water and Sewer requirements are all being met. 11) Park land fees shall be paid as required. 12) Trash containers location and access are as shown on site plan. 13) Storm water is being handled with existing detention pond which has been determined by our engineers and by Stormwater to have adequate capacity for this project. All requirements of Stormwater are being met. 14) Traffic Impact Study has been done which addresses on -site and off -site multi - modal trips, as well as vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian and transit access to site.