Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 - FDP: EXTENSION OF FINAL APPROVAL - 76-93C - CORRESPONDENCE - CITY STAFFSteve Olt - Rj~: Boardwalk Crossing _ Page 21 • However, the Final Development Plan currently is not fully vested because the required engineering improvements as previous cited have not yet been installed and completed. Therefore, if the required improvements are not completed by October 5, 2011 then the property owner/developer will have to submit another request for a 1-year extension, which can be approved only by the Planning & Zoning Board. Please let me know if this information is sufficient for you to take to your "Owner" or if more information would be beneficial. Steve Olt Project Planner 221-6341 solt anfcgov.com >>> Steve Steinbicker <Steve(a)architecturewestllc.com> 9/17/2010 8:16 AM >>> Happy Friday, Steve, probably wearing the Hawaiian flower shirt today, eh ... ?I was not prepared for the discussion on the required "... diligen(ce)t in constructing the engineering improvements.." ?! Dave had not attended the Work Session last Friday, the question didn't really come up.As you stated, a portion of the PUD has been activated but I think we need clarification on what actually satisfies this portion of the Boardwalk Crossing project, on-site/private services, utility stubs, public ROW improvements, etc ....?Could you review this further with Steve Dush, Engineering any other Departments and let me know? I certainly want the Owner to be aware of the specific 'limits' of what Engineering improvements are required. If by chance, this issue arises again in another 12 months, (given the economy and significant vacant retail space on the market, it's highly probable), we need some better understanding of the question and what satisfies that LUC Section? Thanks again for your time on this matter and your efforts over the last several weeks... RegardsSteve Stephen J. Steinbicker, AIA, NCARBLEED Accredited Profess io nalArch itectu re West, LLC970-207-0424 From: Steve Steinbicker Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 1:38 PM To: 'Steve Olt' Subject: RE: Boardwalk Crossing Hi Stevel attended the Work Session, got to meet Courtney, no comments from the Board.l'll still plan to attend Thursday's meeting... Thanks for your help on this.Steve Stephen J. Steinbicker, AIA, NCARBLEED Accredited ProfessionalArchitecture West, LLC970-207-0424 From: Steve Olt fmailto:SOLT(c)fcgov.coml Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:46 PM To: Steve Steinbicker Subject: RE: Boardwalk Crossing Steve, I would recommend that you be at the work Session no later than 12:15 p.m: to make sure that you do not miss any questions Board members may have about the extension request. Steve >>> Steve Steinbicker <Steve(o)architecturewestllc.com> 9/8/2010 1:26 PM >>> Thanks SteveSo I should be there at the beginning hour for any'Consent' discussions, I assume ... ?Thanks for the clarification on a Bank in Commercial, review. Steve Stephen J. Steinbicker, AIA, NCARBLEED Accredited Profess ionalArchitecture West, LLC970-207- Steve Olt - RV-: Boardwalk Crossing Page 1 From: Doug Martine To: Steve Olt; Steve Steinbicker Date: 9/17/2010 1:34:28 PM Subject: RE: Boardwalk Crossing Steve & Steve, All the electric facilities (including street lights) are already installed adjacent to this site. All that remains for Light & Power to install is the electric system to each new transformer when each building develops. There are no Light & Power issues that would affect the requested extension. Thanks... Doug Doug Martine Electric Project Engineering Supervisor (970)224-6152 dmartine@fcgov.com >>> Steve Olt 9/17/2010 12:32 PM >>> Steve, Yes, it is Friday and I am enjoying the comfort of a Hawaiian shirt that does have flowers on it. A 38 year tradition is hard to break. Re: Board Crossing at Mason Street, Final Development Plan Steve D. and I think that Dave Lingle's question was prompted by the fact that, in today's economic world, we are beginning to see more extension requests than in the past. Once a developer has received the first 2 administrative extensions that the Director is authorized to grant (as this project has) then any subsequent extension(s) must go to the Planning & Zoning Board for approval. This is set forth in Section 2.2.11(D)(4) Extensions of the Land Use Code (LUC). The Board is just doing their due diligence to ensure that the LUC requirements are being addressed and properly applied. Regarding your question about what actually satisfies this portion of the Boardwalk Crossing project, on- site/private services, utility stubs, public ROW improvements, etc., and what must be made to fully vest the project, the following criteria is set forth in Section 2.2.11(D)(3) Term of Vested Right of the LUC: Within a maximum of three (3) years following the approval of a final plan or other site specific development plan, the applicant must undertake, install and complete all engineering improvements (water, sewer, street, curb, gutter, street lights, fire hydrants and storm drainage) in accordance with City codes, rules and regulations. Sheri Langenberger and I investigated the status of the Boardwalk Crossing at Mason Street, Final Development Plan this morning and found that: ` Water and sanitary sewer services have not yet been extended to either of the approved new building sites on the Boardwalk Crossing at Mason Street development plan. The public sidewalks along Boardwalk Drive and South Mason Street, adjacent to these proposed buildings on Lots 1 & 2, have not yet been installed. There are proposed surface storm drainage improvements on Lots 1 & 2 that will tie into existing underground storm drains that are not yet constructed. ' We will have to further investigate the status of street lights along Boardwalk Drive and South Mason Street; and, locations of fire hydrants as they relate to this development plan.