HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIMBERVINE - MAJOR AMENDMENT & REPLAT - MJA150001 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Topic: ConstructioSawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015: There are line over text issues that will need to be corrected for final
review.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015: The lighter background text & linework marked is not acceptable. It will
not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015: The cover sheet is not needed, unless the whole plan set is going to be
refiled with the new Plat.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015: No comments.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015: Please change the title & sub -title as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The legal description cannot include the street rights of way, unless
you go through a City Council process to vacate them first. We suggest the
description to be something like "All Lots, Blocks and Tracts of Tlmbervine...".
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: There are spelling issues with some text. See redlines.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: Is a Boxelder Sanitation District approval/easement acceptance block
needed?
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The cover sheet is not needed, unless the whole plan set is going to be
refiled with the new Plat.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015
05/06/2015: There are line over text issues that will need to be corrected for final
review.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinsonAfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The difference in number of units from 167 to 173 is less than 4% and
is not considered to be significant from a traffic operations evaluation perspecctive.
Page 5 of 5
Comment Nmeer: 2
Cokent Originated: 05/08/2015
05/08/2015: ELCO
Plans for the above referenced project were received by East Larimer County Water
District (District). District staff has reviewed and redlined the drawings/documents.
The following comments are to further clarify redlines. Note that comments below
are not included for all redlines.
Sheet Comment
Multiple Sheets - ELCO signature block should be replaced with updated ELCO
signature block. Updated signature block will be emailed to Rob Van Uffelen.
SS Sheets - Remove ELCO block from these sanitary sewer sheets
SS 06 - ELCO line crossing shows approximately 6 inches of clearance between
water and sewer line. On drawing note that ELCO line is can be raised to have 4.5-ft
of cover (drawing appears to show 5.5-ft cover now) and provide 18-inches of
clearance between water and sewer line.
SD02 - Two lines in the profile are labeled as �water� lines. Please review, lower
line appears to be sewer.
DT 03 -There are no ELCO details on this sheet and therefore, remove
ELCO signature block from this page.
EX 01 - No ELCO impacts on this sheet, remove ELCO signature block.
Please return the redlined sheets with the next review set for backchecking.
Sincerely,
Randy
Siddens
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, 0lynxwiler(ftoudre-fire. org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015
05/06/2015: PFA has no comment relative to the replat.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam(ailfcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 04/21/2015
04/21/2015: No Changes were Identified on the Erosion Control Sheets please
resubmit showing proposed changes from the originally submitted material. To
review if criteria was met. If you need clarification concerning this, or if there are any
questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @
jschlam@fcgov.com
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 05/06/2015
05/06/2015: Please provide documentation on what is being revised from the
original approved plans.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountyCcDfcgov.com
Page 4 of 5
Department: Outside A*cies •
Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray(cDfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/08/2015
05/08/2015: Boxelder:
On behalf of the Boxelder Sanitation District (BSD), Farnsworth Group has reviewed
the Final Development Plan identified as:
Utility Plan review for a 167 single family lot subdivision. The Utility Plan proposes
8-inch sanitary sewers throughout the project, connecting into a proposed 10-inch
sanitary sewer flowing South offsite along Mexico Way and eventually connecting to
BSD's existing 15-inch sanitary sewer main in International Blvd,
The District hereby advises as follows:
- There is no objection to this proposal.
- Responses required to comments below.
- The District will respond at the hearing date (TBD)
Comments:
1) Sanitary sewer service shown at Lot 15, Block 2 connecting into manhole SSMH
5-6 will need to be realigned to connect to the sanitary sewer main. BSD will not
allow any services to flow directly into a manhole.
2) The Utility Contact List for BSD needs to change from Patricia Mathena to Karen
Reynolds.
3) Update all construction details and specifications to meet new BSD standards.
To obtain updated details and specifications, reference BSD website or contact
BSD.
4) All utility crossings need to have 18-inches of separation. If crossings are under
18-inches, a casing is required and needs to be shown on profiles at the crossing.
Add callout of separation to all utility crossings in profile view.
5) Manholes SSMH 5-1A and SSMH 8 are shown below Proposed Ground in
profiles. Check manhole rims and adjust accordingly.
6) The plans show manholes in areas where permeable pavers are to be used.
Provide information that describes how these pavers work and will not cause
infiltration problems into manholes.
7) Sanitary Sewer casing will be required on Sanitary Sewer Line 1 at water line
crossing Station 34+91.52. Show and label casing in Plan and Profile.
The District has more than adequate capacity to service the property referenced
above. The District is in full compliance with federal and state water quality
requirements. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Brian Zick, P.E. District Engineer
Page 3 of 5
Comment Nulter: 3 Co*ent Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: Add page to show site info for Mexico Way to International.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa(abfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The development agreement may need to be amended if the existing
agreement refers to specific Tracts or Blocks that will change with the Second
Filing.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The applicant can choose to either revise the old utility plans or submit
a new set. Below is a list of requirements for each option:
Revise old plans: Revision bubbles will be needed around EVERY change on
EVERY sheet in the utility plan. Revision bubbles must be on approved utility plan
sheets with City signatures. A note needs to be added in the revision box that state
that these revisions are due to the Timbervine Second Filing.
Submit new set: New signatures from City staff, Larimier County, Boxelder, Elco
and ditch companies will be required for a new utility plan. With the new plan set,
please do not refer to any revisions. Remove any revision bubbles and sheet
RV01-Index of Revision. Change all sheets to reflect the new legal associated with
the new Plat.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 05/06/2015
05/06/2015: It is recommended that the applicant replat ALL blocks within the
Timbervine development. If the applicant decides to only replat a portion of the
lots/tracts within the block, the lots and tracts that remain unchanged will need to be
listed on the Utility Plan for the second filing.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 05/06/2015
05/06/2015: Change the Developer/Applicant name to Timbervine Holdings, LLC on
the cover sheet of the Utility Plan.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: Please add the following note to the Plat:
The Development Agreement and all amendment agreements for Timbervine shall
apply to the lots created by this plat."
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The Utility Plans must reflect the new legal associated with the new
Plat. Please work with technical services to determine the requirements/direction for
the resubmittal of the plat.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Kelly Kimple, , kkimple(cDfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/0512015: As the revised plans do not modify the buffer landscaping or grading,
environmental planning has no comments.
Page 2 of 5
•
Fort of
May 08, 2015
Russell + Mills Studios
141 S. College Ave., Suite 104
Fort Collins, CO 80524
C�
RE: Timbervine Major Amendment and Replat, MJA150001, Round Number 1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins. CO 80522
970.221.6750
970224.6134 - fax
tcgovcom/developmentre view
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for
your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may
contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at
970-221-6754 or pwray@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/08/2015
05/08/2015: Another round of review is needed, which will be two weeks in duration.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: Add match lines to each sheet to show what is included per sheet.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: Need file pages to cover rest of project past page 7 or LP404.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: General Land Use Data Table: Revise Lot Sizes & Area calculations to
match # of proposed lots (173), not 167. Gross Density - change # of units from 167
to 173 and Gross Density from 4.26 to 4.41. Solar lots change from 101 to 100.
Based on new numbers does any other info in land use data, parking data#'s need
to change as well?'
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: Need to clarify in table or in project summary exactly what is changing.
I see with the MA and Replat there is one less detached lot/DU in Block 3, and
adding on block/DU in Block 2 (no net change), and adding 6 attached lots/DU's in
Block 8. This revises the gross density from 4.26 to 4.41 and Net Density from 5.5
to 5.7.
Page 1 of 5