Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIMBERVINE - MAJOR AMENDMENT & REPLAT - MJA150001 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Topic: ConstructioSawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015 05/04/2015: There are line over text issues that will need to be corrected for final review. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015 05/04/2015: The lighter background text & linework marked is not acceptable. It will not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015 05/04/2015: The cover sheet is not needed, unless the whole plan set is going to be refiled with the new Plat. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015 05/04/2015: No comments. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015 05/04/2015: Please change the title & sub -title as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: The legal description cannot include the street rights of way, unless you go through a City Council process to vacate them first. We suggest the description to be something like "All Lots, Blocks and Tracts of Tlmbervine...". Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: There are spelling issues with some text. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: Is a Boxelder Sanitation District approval/easement acceptance block needed? Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: The cover sheet is not needed, unless the whole plan set is going to be refiled with the new Plat. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015 05/06/2015: There are line over text issues that will need to be corrected for final review. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinsonAfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: The difference in number of units from 167 to 173 is less than 4% and is not considered to be significant from a traffic operations evaluation perspecctive. Page 5 of 5 Comment Nmeer: 2 Cokent Originated: 05/08/2015 05/08/2015: ELCO Plans for the above referenced project were received by East Larimer County Water District (District). District staff has reviewed and redlined the drawings/documents. The following comments are to further clarify redlines. Note that comments below are not included for all redlines. Sheet Comment Multiple Sheets - ELCO signature block should be replaced with updated ELCO signature block. Updated signature block will be emailed to Rob Van Uffelen. SS Sheets - Remove ELCO block from these sanitary sewer sheets SS 06 - ELCO line crossing shows approximately 6 inches of clearance between water and sewer line. On drawing note that ELCO line is can be raised to have 4.5-ft of cover (drawing appears to show 5.5-ft cover now) and provide 18-inches of clearance between water and sewer line. SD02 - Two lines in the profile are labeled as �water� lines. Please review, lower line appears to be sewer. DT 03 -There are no ELCO details on this sheet and therefore, remove ELCO signature block from this page. EX 01 - No ELCO impacts on this sheet, remove ELCO signature block. Please return the redlined sheets with the next review set for backchecking. Sincerely, Randy Siddens Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, 0lynxwiler(ftoudre-fire. org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015 05/06/2015: PFA has no comment relative to the replat. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam(ailfcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/21/2015 04/21/2015: No Changes were Identified on the Erosion Control Sheets please resubmit showing proposed changes from the originally submitted material. To review if criteria was met. If you need clarification concerning this, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015 05/06/2015: Please provide documentation on what is being revised from the original approved plans. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountyCcDfcgov.com Page 4 of 5 Department: Outside A*cies • Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/08/2015 05/08/2015: Boxelder: On behalf of the Boxelder Sanitation District (BSD), Farnsworth Group has reviewed the Final Development Plan identified as: Utility Plan review for a 167 single family lot subdivision. The Utility Plan proposes 8-inch sanitary sewers throughout the project, connecting into a proposed 10-inch sanitary sewer flowing South offsite along Mexico Way and eventually connecting to BSD's existing 15-inch sanitary sewer main in International Blvd, The District hereby advises as follows: - There is no objection to this proposal. - Responses required to comments below. - The District will respond at the hearing date (TBD) Comments: 1) Sanitary sewer service shown at Lot 15, Block 2 connecting into manhole SSMH 5-6 will need to be realigned to connect to the sanitary sewer main. BSD will not allow any services to flow directly into a manhole. 2) The Utility Contact List for BSD needs to change from Patricia Mathena to Karen Reynolds. 3) Update all construction details and specifications to meet new BSD standards. To obtain updated details and specifications, reference BSD website or contact BSD. 4) All utility crossings need to have 18-inches of separation. If crossings are under 18-inches, a casing is required and needs to be shown on profiles at the crossing. Add callout of separation to all utility crossings in profile view. 5) Manholes SSMH 5-1A and SSMH 8 are shown below Proposed Ground in profiles. Check manhole rims and adjust accordingly. 6) The plans show manholes in areas where permeable pavers are to be used. Provide information that describes how these pavers work and will not cause infiltration problems into manholes. 7) Sanitary Sewer casing will be required on Sanitary Sewer Line 1 at water line crossing Station 34+91.52. Show and label casing in Plan and Profile. The District has more than adequate capacity to service the property referenced above. The District is in full compliance with federal and state water quality requirements. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Brian Zick, P.E. District Engineer Page 3 of 5 Comment Nulter: 3 Co*ent Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: Add page to show site info for Mexico Way to International. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa(abfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: The development agreement may need to be amended if the existing agreement refers to specific Tracts or Blocks that will change with the Second Filing. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: The applicant can choose to either revise the old utility plans or submit a new set. Below is a list of requirements for each option: Revise old plans: Revision bubbles will be needed around EVERY change on EVERY sheet in the utility plan. Revision bubbles must be on approved utility plan sheets with City signatures. A note needs to be added in the revision box that state that these revisions are due to the Timbervine Second Filing. Submit new set: New signatures from City staff, Larimier County, Boxelder, Elco and ditch companies will be required for a new utility plan. With the new plan set, please do not refer to any revisions. Remove any revision bubbles and sheet RV01-Index of Revision. Change all sheets to reflect the new legal associated with the new Plat. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015 05/06/2015: It is recommended that the applicant replat ALL blocks within the Timbervine development. If the applicant decides to only replat a portion of the lots/tracts within the block, the lots and tracts that remain unchanged will need to be listed on the Utility Plan for the second filing. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015 05/06/2015: Change the Developer/Applicant name to Timbervine Holdings, LLC on the cover sheet of the Utility Plan. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: Please add the following note to the Plat: The Development Agreement and all amendment agreements for Timbervine shall apply to the lots created by this plat." Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: The Utility Plans must reflect the new legal associated with the new Plat. Please work with technical services to determine the requirements/direction for the resubmittal of the plat. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Kelly Kimple, , kkimple(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/0512015: As the revised plans do not modify the buffer landscaping or grading, environmental planning has no comments. Page 2 of 5 • Fort of May 08, 2015 Russell + Mills Studios 141 S. College Ave., Suite 104 Fort Collins, CO 80524 C� RE: Timbervine Major Amendment and Replat, MJA150001, Round Number 1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522 970.221.6750 970224.6134 - fax tcgovcom/developmentre view Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at 970-221-6754 or pwray@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/08/2015 05/08/2015: Another round of review is needed, which will be two weeks in duration. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: Add match lines to each sheet to show what is included per sheet. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: Need file pages to cover rest of project past page 7 or LP404. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: General Land Use Data Table: Revise Lot Sizes & Area calculations to match # of proposed lots (173), not 167. Gross Density - change # of units from 167 to 173 and Gross Density from 4.26 to 4.41. Solar lots change from 101 to 100. Based on new numbers does any other info in land use data, parking data#'s need to change as well?' Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: Need to clarify in table or in project summary exactly what is changing. I see with the MA and Replat there is one less detached lot/DU in Block 3, and adding on block/DU in Block 2 (no net change), and adding 6 attached lots/DU's in Block 8. This revises the gross density from 4.26 to 4.41 and Net Density from 5.5 to 5.7. Page 1 of 5