HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIMBERVINE - MAJOR AMENDMENT & REPLAT - MJA150001 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS (3)05/05/2015: T gal description cannot include the stafi rights of way, unless
you go througity Council process to vacate them fie suggest the
description to be something like "All Lots, Blocks and Tracts of Tlmbervine...".
Response: We are pursuing vacation of all roads and rededicating them by
this plat.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: There are spelling issues with some text. See redlines.
Response: Corrected as requested.
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: Is a Boxelder Sanitation District approval/easement acceptance block
needed?
Response: A signature block was not requested previously as long as their
language was on the plat. No easements have been specifically dedicated to
Boxelder. A signature block has been added, if it is not required, please let us
know.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The cover sheet is not needed, unless the whole plan set is going to be
refiled with the new Plat.
Response: The cover sheet has been removed from the Minor Amendment
submittal.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 05/06/2015
05/06/2015: There are line over text issues that will need to be corrected for final
review.
Response: No redlines were recieved in reference to this. Previous
reproduction of the original set did not indicate any issues.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The difference in number of units from 167 to 173 is less than 4% and
is not considered to be significant from a traffic operations evaluation perspecctive.
Response: Noted.
review if criterijIgas met. If you need clarification conceng this, or if there are any
questions pledwontact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 Wmail @
jschlam@fcgov.com
Response: There were no significant changes that impacted the erosion
control. Minor shifts of prior approved BMPs and the pan crossing moved in
the south east corner. Discussed on the Phone 5/19/15.
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamaraueno fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015
05/06/2015: Please provide documentation on what is being revised from the
original approved plans.
Response: A letter has been provided documenting basin impacts along with
entire site impacts.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountv(o�fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015: There are line over text issues that will need to be corrected for final
review.
Response: Updated.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015: The lighter background text & linework marked is not acceptable. It will
not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up.
Response: No redlines were noted in reference to this. Previous reproduction
of the original signed sealed set did not indicate any issues.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015: The cover sheet is not needed, unless the whole plan set is going to be
refiled with the new Plat.
Response: The cover sheet has been removed from the Minor Amendment
submittal.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 4
05/04/2015: No comments.
Topic: Plat
Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015: Please change the title & sub -title as marked. See redlines.
Response: Revised as requested.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
Brian Zick, P.E&trict Engineer
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/08/2015 05/08/2015: ELCO
Plans for the above referenced project were received by East Larimer County Water
District (District). District staff has reviewed and redlined the drawings/documents.
The following comments are to further clarify redlines. Note that comments below
are not included for all redlines.
Sheet Comment
Multiple Sheets - ELCO signature block should be replaced with updated ELCO
signature block. Updated signature block will be emailed to Rob Van Uffelen.
Response: Updated.
SS Sheets - Remove ELCO block from these sanitary sewer sheets
Response: Updated.
SS 06 - ELCO line crossing shows approximately 6 inches of clearance between
water and sewer line. On drawing note that ELCO line is can be raised to have 4.5-ft
of cover (drawing appears to show 5.5-ft cover now) and provide 18-inches of
clearance between water and sewer line.
Response: Updated.
SD02 - Two lines in the profile are labeled as �water� lines. Please review, lower
line appears to be sewer.
Response: Updated.
DT 03 -There are no ELCO details
ELCO signature block from this page.
Response: Updated.
on this sheet and therefore, remove
EX 01 - No ELCO impacts on this sheet, remove ELCO signature block.
Response: Updated.
Please return the redlined sheets with the next review set for backchecking.
Sincerely,
Randy
Siddens
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, iynxwiler ooudre-fire.ora
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015
05/06/2015: PFA has no comment relative to the replat.
Response: Noted.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 04/21/2015
04/21/2015: No Changes were Identified on the Erosion Control Sheets please
resubmit showing proposed changes from the originally submitted material. To
Utility Plan reo for a 167 single family lot subdivisior(�e Utility Plan proposes
8-inch sanitary sewers throughout the project, connecting into a proposed 10-inch
sanitary sewer flowing South offsite along Mexico Way and eventually connecting to
BSD's existing 15-inch sanitary sewer main in International Blvd.
The District hereby advises as follows:
- There is no objection to this proposal.
- Responses required to comments below.
- The District will respond at the hearing date (TBD)
Comments:
1) Sanitary sewer service shown at Lot 15, Block 2 connecting into manhole SSMH
5-6 will need to be realigned to connect to the sanitary sewer main. BSD will not
allow any services to flow directly into a manhole.
Response: Connection updated
2) The Utility Contact List for BSD needs to change from Patricia Mathena to Karen
Reynolds.
Response: Updated.
3) Update all construction details and specifications to meet new BSD standards.
To obtain updated details and specifications, reference BSD website or contact
BSD.
Response: Updated.
4) All utility crossings need to have 18-inches of separation. If crossings are under
18-inches, a casing is required and needs to be shown on profiles at the crossing.
Add callout of separation to all utility crossings in profile view.
Response: Updated.
5) Manholes SSMH 5-1A and SSMH 8 are shown below Proposed Ground in
profiles. Check manhole rims and adjust accordingly.
Response: Updated.
6) The plans show manholes in areas where permeable pavers are to be used.
Provide information that describes how these pavers work and will not cause
infiltration problems into manholes.
Response: Note 12 added to Sanitary Sewer plan and profile sheets.
Permeable pavers are to have connection to Storm and outfall the collected
storm water.
7) Sanitary Sewer casing will be required on Sanitary Sewer Line 1 at water line
crossing Station 34+91.52. Show and label casing in Plan and Profile.
Response: Added.
The District has more than adequate capacity to service the property referenced
above. The District is in full compliance with federal and state water quality
requirements. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Comment Num er: 5 Co ment Originated: O5/06/2015
05/06/2015: It commended that the applicant replabL blocks within the
Timbervine development. If the applicant decides to only replat a portion of the
lots/tracts within the block, the lots and tracts that remain unchanged will need to be
listed on the Utility Plan for the second filing.
Response: Title Matches Plat.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 05/06/2015
05/06/2015: Change the Developer/Applicant name to Timbervine Holdings, LLC on
the cover sheet of the Utility Plan.
Response: Updated.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: Please add the following note to the Plat:
The Development Agreement and all amendment agreements for Timbervine shall
apply to the lots created by this plat."
Response: Added as requested.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The Utility Plans must reflect the new legal associated with the new
Plat. Please work with technical services to determine the requirements/direction for
the resubmittal of the plat.
Response: We have opted to pursue the vacation of all public right of way within
the perimeter of Timbervine. A vacation application will be submitted shortly. The
subdivision perimeter will remain the same in order to reflect that the entire
perimeter is being included in Timbervine Filing No. 2. The right of way for Dunkel
Street will shift east, but otherwise the right of way will remain unchanged from
the plat of Timbervine. The plat submitted reflects the inclusion of all the right of
way and the above proposed change to Dunkel Street.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Kelly Kimple, , kkim Ip e(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: As the revised plans do not modify the buffer landscaping or grading,
environmental planning has no comments.
Response: Noted.
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwrayrdfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
05/08/2015: Boxelder:
Comment Originated: 05/08/2015
On behalf of the Boxelder Sanitation District (BSD), Farnsworth Group has reviewed
the Final Development Plan identified as:
Areahalculations to match # of proposed lot 73), not 167. Gross
Den( `- change # of units from 167 to 173 Gross Density from
4.26 to 4.41. Solar lots change from 101 to 10
Ll
Based on new numbers does any other info in land use data,
parking data#'s need to change as well?'
Response: All land use data has been updated per the layout
adjustments.
Comment Number: 2
05/05/2015
Comment Originated:
05/05/2015: Need to clarify in table or in project summary exactly
what is changing. I see with the MA and Replat there is one less
detached lot/DU in Block 3, and adding on block/DU in Block 2 (no
net change), and adding 6 attached lots/DU's in Block 8. This
revises the gross density from 4.26 to 4.41 and Net Density from 5.5
to 5.7.
Response: A summary memo with a table of changes has been
included in the submittal that explains changes to the plans.
Comment Number: 3 Comment
Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: Add page to show site info for
Mexico Way to International.
Response: LS403 has been added to show the site information for
Mexico Way to International Blvd.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa fcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The development agreement may need to be amended if the existing
agreement refers to specific Tracts or Blocks that will change with the Second
Filing.
Response: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 05/05/2015
05/05/2015: The applicant can choose to either revise the old utility plans or submit
a new set. Below is a list of requirements for each option:
Revise old plans: Revision bubbles will be needed around EVERY change on
EVERY sheet in the utility plan. Revision bubbles must be on approved utility plan
sheets with City signatures. A note needs to be added in the revision box that state
that these revisions are due to the Timbervine Second Filing.
Submit new set: New signatures from City staff, Larimier County, Boxelder, Elco
and ditch companies will be required for a new utility plan. With the new plan set,
please do not refer to any revisions. Remove any revision bubbles and sheet
RV01-Index of Revision. Change all sheets to reflect the new legal associated with
the new Plat.
Response: No new legal but the title has been updated to match the plat.
i
City of
Fort Collins
May 08, 2015
Russell + Mills Studios
141 S. College
Ave., Suite 104 Fort
Collins, CO 80524
• Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov com/developmentrewew
RE: Timbervine Major Amendment and Replat, MJA150001, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions
about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your
questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at 970-221-6754 or
pwray@fcgov.com.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754,
gwray@fcgov.com Topic: General
Comment Number: 6
Comment
Originated: 05/08/2015 05/08/2015: Another round of review is
needed, which will be two weeks in duration.
Response: Acknowledged.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 4
Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015
show what is included per sheet.
Comment
Add match lines to each sheet to
Response: Match lines have been added to the overall planting
plan indicating where the enlargement sheets are located.
Comment Number: 5 Comment
Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: Need file pages to cover rest of
project past page 7 or LP404.
Response: An LP404 sheet has been added.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1
05/05/2015
Comment Originated:
05/05/2015: General Land Use Data Table: Revise Lot Sizes &