The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTIMBERVINE - MAJOR AMENDMENT & REPLAT - MJA150001 - CORRESPONDENCE -Comment Ntsker: 18 C*ent Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: Since the Utility Plans are no longer being revised, we suggest that a completely new set of plans be filed. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: Since the Utility Plans are no longer being revised, we suggest that a completely new set of plans be filed. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: Please make changes to the legal description as marked. Technically you could remove all bearing & distance calls by referencing prior Subdivision. This is your choice. See redlines. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate document must be added prior to mylars. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: Please revise the monumentation along the west boundary line, to following C.R.S. 38-51-105 (1) (c). See redlines. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: What is the box (marked) near the south of the Sour Street & Shandy Street intersection? See redlines. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: Please correct the description (marked) on sheet 4. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: Since the Utility Plans are no longer being revised, we suggest that a completely new set of plans be filed. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/05/2015 05/05/2015: The difference in number of units from 167 to 173 is less than 4% and is not considered to be significant from a traffic operations evaluation perspecctive. Page 6 of 6 Comment Nuar: 1 Co0ent Originated: 05/04/2015 06/03/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 05/04/2015: There are line over text issues that will need to be corrected for final review. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/04/2015 06/03/2015: The lighter background text & linework marked is not acceptable. It will not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up. If it is not needed on the plans, it should be removed. See redlines. 05/04/2015: The lighter background text & linework marked is not acceptable. It will not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 06103/2015 06/03/2015: Please revise the benchmark statements on all sheets to the following. All benchmark information needs to match on all sheets. PROJECT DATUM: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (OLD CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # wl DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: If using NGVD29 UNADJUSTED the following equation statement will be needed. NOTE: IF NAVD 88 DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NAVD88 = NGVD29 UNADJUSTED + X.XX6. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: The titles in the sheet index do not match the titles on the marked sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: Please tie the coordinate values shown for utilities to the project boundary. We would prefer that this be done by adding property corner values to each sheet, or showing the property corner values on the horizontal control plans and adding a note to each sheet with coordinate values. There appear to be values for the boundary corners on the utility plan sheets. If these are boundary corner coordinates, please label them as that. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 06/03/2015 06/03/2015: There are issues with matchline references. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Page 5 of 6 Comment Weer: 2 Cent Originated: 05/08/2015 05/08/2015: ELCO Plans for the above referenced project were received by East Larimer County Water District (District). District staff has reviewed and redlined the drawings/documents. The following comments are to further clarify redlines. Note that comments below are not included for all redlines. Sheet Comment Multiple Sheets - ELCO signature block should be replaced with updated ELCO signature block. Updated signature block will be emailed to Rob Van Uffelen. SS Sheets - Remove ELCO block from these sanitary sewer sheets SS 06 - ELCO line crossing shows approximately 6 inches of clearance between water and sewer line. On drawing note that ELCO line is can be raised to have 4.5-ft of cover (drawing appears to show 5.5-ft cover now) and provide 18-inches of clearance between water and sewer line. SD02 - Two lines in the profile are labeled as �water� lines. Please review, lower line appears to be sewer. DT 03 -There are no ELCO details on this sheet and therefore, remove ELCO signature block from this page. EX 01 - No ELCO impacts on this sheet, remove ELCO signature block. Please return the redlined sheets with the next review set for backchecking. Sincerely, Randy Siddens Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, ilynxwiler(a�poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015 05/06/2015: PFA has no comment relative to the replat. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue(o fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/04/2015 06/04/2015: Stormwater is ready for a hearing. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue(@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/06/2015 05/06/2015: Please provide documentation on what is being revised from the original approved plans. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty(g�fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Page 4 of 6 Comment Nuar: 1 Co9ent Originated: 05/08/2015 05/08/2015: Boxelder On behalf of the Boxelder Sanitation District (BSD), Farnsworth Group has reviewed the Final Development Plan identified as: Utility Plan review for a 167 single family lot subdivision. The Utility Plan proposes 8-inch sanitary sewers throughout the project, connecting into a proposed 10-inch sanitary sewer flowing South offsite along Mexico Way and eventually connecting to BSD's existing 15-inch sanitary sewer main in International Blvd. The District hereby advises as follows: - There is no objection to this proposal. - Responses required to comments below. - The District will respond at the hearing date (TBD) Comments: 1) Sanitary sewer service shown at Lot 15, Block 2 connecting into manhole SSMH 5-6 will need to be realigned to connect to the sanitary sewer main. BSD will not allow any services to flow directly into a manhole. 2) The Utility Contact List for BSD needs to change from Patricia Mathena to Karen Reynolds. 3) Update all construction details and specifications to meet new BSD standards. To obtain updated details and specifications, reference BSD website or contact BSD. 4) All utility crossings need to have 18-inches of separation. If crossings are under 18-inches, a casing is required and needs to be shown on profiles at the crossing. Add callout of separation to all utility crossings in profile view. 5) Manholes SSMH 5-1A and SSMH 8 are shown below Proposed Ground in profiles. Check manhole rims and adjust accordingly. 6) The plans show manholes in areas where permeable pavers are to be used. Provide information that describes how these pavers work and will not cause infiltration problems into manholes. 7) Sanitary Sewer casing will be required on Sanitary Sewer Line 1 at water line crossing Station 34+91.52. Show and label casing in Plan and Profile. The District has more than adequate capacity to service the property referenced above. The District is in full compliance with federal and state water quality requirements. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Brian Zick, P.E. District Engineer Page 3 of 6 Comment Nuter: 10 Cd*ent Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: Angled sidewalk chases are not allowed. Please revise chase on Lager and Saison Street. See redlines. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: It appears with the revision of lot lines, a layer was not changed. Please adjust Lot labeling on all Street Plan and Profile sheets (RD01, RD02, RD04, RD05, RD07, RD08, RD12, RD13). Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: More elevation points will be needed for the intersection of Trappist Street and Saison Street where the sidewalk chase is located (Sheet RD10) or a note can be added to �"See Sheet RD18 for more details"�, Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: Please update detail sheets with the updated LCUASS drawings. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: ADA ramps need to align. (Saison and Lager; Stout and Lager) Please see redlines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: Please show the transition on Dunkel Street at Mackinac. A minimum of 30' is required. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: Label the transition distance at Saison Street and Stout Street. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: Lot labels on street plan and profile sheets have not been updated with the lot line adjustments. They currently show the numbering from the original project. Please see redlines. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray(o-)fcgov.com Topic: General Page 2 of 6 • Fort of isCommunity Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax kgov.com/developmentreview June 05, 2015 Russell + Mills Studios 141 S. College Ave., Suite 104 Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Timbervine Major Amendment and Replat, MJA150001, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at 970-221-6754 or pwray@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray(d)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/05/2015 06/05/2015: This project is ready for hearing, scheduled for June 18. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: Enlarge proposed street light fixture locations on plan. It is very hard to see these as shown. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: Tract B - Make sure cut -through paths between lots 9-10, 23, 24, 28-29, and 33-34 have a minimum lot to lot clearance of 10 feet to allow space on either side of the S walk. This minimum corridor width is acceptable, in review of the LCUASS standard. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: Since the Plat will not be included in the final Utility Plans, please remove the Plat (For reference only) item from the Sheet Index. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/29/2015 05/29/2015: List Private Drives in the General and Construction Notes #47. Page 1 of 6