HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAPSTONE COTTAGES - PDP - PDP140004 - CORRESPONDENCE - OTHER JURISDICTIONS (5)SOIL
i
Sampling Print �-�-
Profile Description: (Deaerlbe to the depth needed to document the indicator or eonflrm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(indtesl Color. ^I % color
moistl �_ � �
Texture Remarks
^
'Type: C-Concentration D= tion RM=Reduced MatrixCS--Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Unino. M=Matrix.
Hydric Boll Indicators: (Applicable to ail LRRe, unless otharwlee noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hyddc Soils":
_ Hislosol (Al)
_ Sandy Gloyed Matrix (S4)
_ 1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR 1, J)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR F, G. H)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Stripped Matrix (SB)
— Dark Surface (S7) (LRR G)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (AA)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171)
_ High Plains Depressions (F16)
_ Stratified Layers (AS) (LRR F)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(LRR H oubkb of MLRA 72 11173)
_ 1 an Muck (Ag) (LRR F, G, H)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al1)
_ Redox Dark Surface (FB)
_ Red Parent Materiel (TF2)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
— Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ 2.5 km Mucky Peal or Peet (52) (LRR G, H)
_ High Plains Depressions (FIB)
'Indiralors of hydrophydc vegetation and
_ 5 km Mudry Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR F)
(MLRA T2 8 73 of LRR H)
wetland hydrology must be present.
unless disturbed or problematic.
ReetricUve Layer (if /present):
�.
Type:
Depth (Inches): �fi
Hydrlc Sell Present? Yes No `
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum
tilt Secondary
Indicators (minimum two
of one raouired: check
_ Surface Water (Al)
all aenly)
_ San Crust (B11)
of reouirecil
_ Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Invertebrates (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (BID)
_ Water Marks (81)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Oxidized Rhixospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposes (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhimsphetes on Living Roots (C3)
(whom filled)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
(whore not filled)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geon ojphlc Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (05)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9j
Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No
// Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes _ No
_ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _ No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
(Includes caDUlary fringe)
Describe Recorded Date (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). H available:
Remarks: [/u
US Army Corps of Engineers Great Plains -Version 2-0
CAPSTONE COTTAGES WETLAND EXHIBIT - FEBRUARY 18, 2014
TESTHOLE / / -4938 — — — — — — 4937 - !�
—
i
— _ — / Y - --
- i 4937�
/4936—^�---
qt
-4939—�r----�-----
/
4934\�
\�
.4939/
r,
J
\
/' f
J V TESTHOLE \ �1
4939�
— ' 4935- .�
— \ "CC-4"
V4934
LOT 1 \'
BANK OF
COLORADO
1,030SF �4933�\�
TESTHOLE
n \ I ( "Cc-7" 1
TESTHOLE,ry
'
M
L
\ \ \ TESTHOLE
LINCOLN AVENUE
\\�\\ 7,821 S.F. v m a,
BUFFALO RUN��49
APARTMENTS P.U.D.
TESTHOLE
100 /
\ 100 0 100 Feet
1 inch FEET00 ft. \ TESTHOLE \\\\\
cc-1" \
J�
VICINITY MAP
1 if = 2000'
"W-2" (NORTH AREA)
432 S.F.
"W-2" (MIDDLE AREA)
170 S.F.
"W-2" (SOUTH AREA)
74 S.F.
FORT COLLINS
BUSINESS CENTER
THIRD FILING
LEGEND
-------------- WETLAND
BOUNDARY
M TESTHOLE
W NORTHERN
ENGINEERING
lW SwN CdbR 4,anue, Meow PHUNC,910.221.4159 FU,970,221.4159
Fed Will., W9tetlo U524 ....rth.".4l0ae4PWmm
SOIL
Samdina print.
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Manx Redox Features
-finches) Cdw tmdsll ,%_ Type Loc.
Texture Remeft
.%''
d �YT 7—
'Type: C-Concentration D-De etion RMaReduced Matrix CS-Ceverad or Costed Send Grains. 'Location: PL-Pors Uni M=Matrbk.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to afi LRRe, unless afnnrise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls:
— Hlstersd (At) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ 1 an Muds (Ag) (LRR I, J)
— Hlstic EWpedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Coast Prom Redox (A16) (LRR F, G, H)
Black Histic (A3) — Stripped Maw (S6)
_ Dark Surface (ST) (LRR G)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
_ High Plains Depressions (F16)
— Stratified Layers (AS) (LRR F) — Loamy Cloyed Matrix (F2)
(LRR H outside of YLRA 72 8 73)
— 1 an Muck (Ag) (LRR F, G. H) _ Depleted Matrix (F3)
— Reduced Vartic (F18)
Depleted Beirnv Dark Surface (All) gdax Dark Surface (Fill)
_Red Parent Materiel (TFZ)
— Thick Deck Surfers (A72) — Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) — Radox Depressions (FB)
_ Other (Expiafn in Remarks)
_ 2.5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S2) (LRR G, H) _ High Plains Deprassions (F16)
' ndketors of hytimphytic vegetation and
— 5 cm Mucky Past or Peet (33) (LRR F) (MIJtA 72 R 73 of LRR H)
wettand hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer/ff present):
Type: /l/Xh
�em ,^t
th (s):
' /
,�!'
Hydric Soil Prevent? Yss ` No
Remarks:
1`7TUKVLIJ ZY
Welland Hydrology Indicators:
of one required'
Surface Water (Al)
check all that aooly)
— Salt Crust (811)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two rea a+)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
_ Aquatic Invertebrates (B 13)
Hydrogen
S mely Vegetated Concave Surface (B6)
— Sulfide Odor (Cl)
ge Patterns (810)
Water Marks (131)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
— Orddlzed Rhizospheres on Living Roola (C3)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
(whore tilled)
— Drift Deposits (B3)
(where not tilled)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Angel Mat or Crust (84)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Viable on Aeral Imagery (Cg)
Iron Deposits (85)
— Thin Muck Surface (C7)
G Geomorphic Position (D2)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
— FAGNeubal Test (05)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Frost -Heave Hummocks (137) (LRR F)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
No /- Depth Qnches):
Water Table Present? Yea _
No:Z D th Qnches):
Saturation Presem? Yea_
No Dapth (fnches):
/
Weeend Hydrology Present? Yea ✓ No
Includes capillary (rings)
—
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monkoring wall, aertat photos, prevbus Inapeuiimnsti N available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Greet Plains -Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Great Plains Region
ProJect/Site: F� ldr/1; _ Only � yGM//,[/ Sarroing Data:
canl/O�wner. a� �"'T .•�i / •. �s plkrp Ploklt
Appli
InvestigalorjsY _,�, i_:i Sectlon, Township, Rordw
Landforrn (nillslope, terrace, Loral relief (cancel e, eottwax, llortsx r �/,L� $lope (9(,k Z
Subregion (LRR):. �— Lat Al qJ.?1- % Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: - NM classification: O/r'%J Y ..+
Are climatic / hydrologic coon litiore on the site 'cal for this time of year! Yes No (if no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly dislurbed7 "'Normal Circumstances- present? Yes __�No
Are Vegetation _, Sal . or Hydrology naturally problametie? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sol Present? Yea No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No wither a Wetland you No
�J
VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1 •
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Status
Dominance Teat worksheat
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): (A)
Taal Number of Dominant
Species Aamas All Strata: ? (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are lam, FACW, or FAC: � (AIB)
2.
3.
4.
= Saplinciftrub Stratum
( k. J Total Cover
�, . ^
2. -
Prevalence Index workaheet:
Total %Cover of- Multiply by,
OBL spades x 1 =
FACW spades x 2 =
FAC spades x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL spades x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = &A =
3.
4.
5.
/
Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot slml ld.k 3451 �1
� _
i f �F'Aq ��,,
2 } f ^,
3. //I
4.
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
— 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
— 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
—3 - Prevalence Index is s3.o'
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
date in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophyfic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric Sae and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problertetk.
6
7.
8.
9
70
�/^ TotalCesar
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: �
1
2.
Hydrophydc
Vegetation - /
Present? Yes ✓ No
Total Cover
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum ��
Remarks:
!heat Preens — Verelon 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Great Plains Regan
Pro(ecVsits: 4f
Cityrcouni 1- r'u: �4!/.5 sentiong Dote: �`' •'�Z l3
Apip lcant/Owner. 7 .., i y-� :.- �', /• ..
•
�.�
�lJYir�;' & State: u1 Sampit PoNt
Investigator(s): ja y �i.1/ �1��i�L
Section, TownsNp, R ange: 5/ T�/ i/ �L .i✓
Landform (hillslope, terrace,, almy `,
Lard relief (concave, convex, none): IF
Slope (%jc
Subregion(LRR):_'-�'
Let�'Q%5.�2�J7� Long:r:t.L�i%7._%�i Z patim,
Soil Map Unit Name: � �!�.%OiYI
WAdasslfitation:
Are dimatic / hydrologicconditions on e site typfcal for this bone of year? Yea No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Jr
Are Vegetation � Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed? Ana 'Normal Cincumstences` • /
present? Yes /� No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology
naturally problematlo? (It needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydnc Soil Present?
Wetland HydroloW Present?
Yes No V Is the Sampled Aroa
Yes No `/
Yallo !� Ii
wltlUn a Weiland? Yea No
Remarks: -
VEGETA710N — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? SUtm
Dominance Test workshout:
Number d Dominant Spades
That Ana OBL- FACW or FAC _
(excluding FAC-): '-� (A)
Total Number of Dondnant
Spades Across All Strata: / (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
2.
3.
4.
i __,:-�•_ = Total Cover
SedlnpJShrub Stratum (Plot size: �/
1.
2.
PnveNnca Indent woAuhwt:
Total % Cover of Mutdoly by
08L species x 1 =
FACW spades x 2 =
FAC spades x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 -
Column
Column Totals: (A) (13)
Prevalence Index = a/A =
3
4.
S.
�,-/��%'�� --e=- = Total Cover
ram (Plot site: /
1. �d�, r�i/i 6 `� A-�i� i�
2. 'sir:_, a::.�... ,•� �
3.
4.
5_
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
— / - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
—2 - Dominance Test is >50%
— 3 - Preva" Index is 5*IV
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of h ydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
7.
8
9
10_
Woody Vin Stratum (Plot size:f Tom Cover
Nr4 i
1
2•
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No 4 /
Total Cover
% Bore Ground In Herb Stratum
Remarks:
US Army Corps on cnginears
Great Plains - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point
Profile Description: ((Ascribe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
finches) Color (moist) % Color
Imolst) Tvve
Texture Remarks
a -A" D(, �Z `� . � � � /V1
'7 : C=Concsntretion 10--Deplellon, RM=Reduosd Matibk CS -Covered or Coated Send Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lin M=Marix.
Hydric Solt Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRa, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Salle :
_ Histosd (At)
_ Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 1, J)
_ Hlstic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR F. G. H)
_ Buck Histk: (A3)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR G)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Ft)
_ High Plains Depressions (F16)
Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR F)
„ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(LRR H outside of MLRA 72 6 73)
_ 1 cm Muds (AP) (LRR F, G, H)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Reduced Vertic (FIB)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al1)
�Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_
_ Red Parent Materiel M)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
— Very Shallow Dark Surface (rF12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (St)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
2.5 cm Mucky Peat or Past (S2) (LRR G, H)
_ High Plains Depressions (F16)
'tndiralors of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ 5 cm Murry Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR F)
(MLRA 72 6 73 of LRR H)
wetland hydrology must be pmsenL
urdess disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if ):
Type: '7
LNo
Depth (IrKhes): �ii%
Hydric WI Prsserd? Yea
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check
Surface Water (All
all that sootvl
_ Salt Gust (B11)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reaukW)
— Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High deter Table (AZ)
_ Aquatic Invertebrates (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
e0rainage Patterns (810)
Water Marks (fit)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Oxidf2ed Rhizosphems on Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ OxidVed Rhi s uheres on LWng Roots (C3)
(where Ned)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
(when not tilled)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Presence of Reduced Iran (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (BS)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
-L*�Geomorphfc Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ FAGNeutral Test (DS)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F)
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No _✓Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes _ No ✓Depth cinches):
Saturation Present? Yes _ No Al."Depth cinches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes '" No
Includes capUlary fri e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If evelieble:
Remarks: /5 .4 �E�i%YI�+/C�j /Q/?!�'/Q -4t !% 6f/'✓r �h G�
US Army Corps of Engineers Grant Plains - Version 2.0
Pmisct/Slte: .' Ciy/CoeltQ.. ✓Wr, 4:;�111A,4 Sampling Dale:. �3
Applicant/Owner •-�• .-�"—+'� i '/ S State: . J Sanong Point .�
Investigator(s): ^i. . =: %it/ Section, Township, Range: ?�I
Lendform (htilsbpe, terran, ale.): i-'��,JssJl•/ri� Local relief (concave, convex, nonsk 4� 1, ): � Slope (��
Subregion � gion(LRR): Let:A 40 laq:�.y—�:J�.?�rG�� Datum: 0- y
Sal Map Unit Nerve: /J'% f-> ..•%- NWI dassiflntion:
Are dlmabc / hydrologic conditions on the site typ I for this timed year? Yea (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Am 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes_` No
Are Vegetation Sal or Hydrology nahsaly problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features, etc.
Hydrophybc Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No whhln a Wetland? Yea �� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Great Plains Region
_, .i
VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
TreeSInWm /�/�/A ,
(fit sixa ^ I/ l
1 •
solute Dominant Indicator
% Cove ? -'Slatus—
Dominance Testworksheet•
Number of Dominant Spades
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC )
(excluding FAC-): / (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Spades Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
2,
3.
4.
./�- = Total Cover
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �
I.
2.
Prevalence Index worksheeC
Total % Cover of Multidv bw
OBL spades x 1 -
FACW species x 2 -
FAC spades x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x $ =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A =
3.
4.
S
Herb Stratum (Plot size: -Total Cover
7,2 C'"2&2
!� j�jQ-
f`�i
2• '- �� �_
4. �y-r ,
—"-�_
5.
Hydrophytic Vegelatkm Indleston:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
—2 - Dominance Test is >60%
—3 - Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sail and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
7.
B.
9.
10.
-Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: N.9 )
1.
2.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation , /
Present? Yes v No
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 7 s $ = Total Cover
Remarks:
"•' ^••••, ,....,... ^ ...a.' �'� [hest Pteins - Version 2.0
SOIL
Samdirig Point LZ -
Profile Descrlptlon: (Deacilbe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confine the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
fkdtaalColor (moist) Color
(moist) �'
Texture Remarks
_$_
_ _
'Type: C-Concentration D=De etion RM-Reduced MatrixCS--Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Loralbn: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hyddc Solis :
_ Histosd (At)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ 1 rm Muds (Ag) (LRR L J)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR F. G. H)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
._ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR G)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
_ High Plains Depresafons (F16)
_ Stratified Layers (AS) (LRR F)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(Litt H cubAl of MLRA 72 6 73)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR F, G, H)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Sumacs (TF12)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (St)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ OUrer (Explain In Remarks)
_ 2.5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S2) (LRR G, H)
_ High Plains Depressions (F16)
'Indicators of hydrophydc vegetation and
_ 5 an Mucky Peat or Peet (S3) (LRR F)
(MLRA 72 8 73 of LRR H)
wetland hydrology must be present.
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (If Present):
--
Type: Ai SA4 t_
/
Depot (inches): �'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Noy
Remarks: / ,.-
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one reuuired:
check all that apply) Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reouired )
_ Surface Water (At)
_ Sett Crust (811)
— Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic invertebrates (B13)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (118)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_— Water Marks (Bl)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhimspheras on Living Roots (C3)
(where tilled)
_ Drilt Deposits (B3)
(whom not tilled)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Gust (64)
— Raeerx:e of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ FAGNeWaI Test (DS)
_ WaterStalned Leaves (B9)
_ Frost -Heave Hummocks (07) (LRR F)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_
No4/Depth Onches):
Water Table Present? Yes _
No —,LZ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _
No _ Depth (Itches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yss__. No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks• i /L/ //✓�/�i' � =
_
US Army Corps of Engineers Great Plains - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Great Plains Region
„rev':' f;iC• r..;� i �
Projed7Sda: Gyf ,Y� - d Sampling Data: '4•-I�.�
ADplicarWOvinar iC� i�%S��CJrrP�• !il /%=-� r_�-rr t�-z/.,GIQ/ stow: CA:V- Sampling Poktt •-�•
i
Investlgalor(s): -!5, %f'1 'II',�'s�i,�r, Section, Township, Range: _ f2e- -7 , l< 7N '•'• " ='✓f/
Landkxrn (hlllslope, terrace, etc): r'A/r��y s�,�/�/ ,, Local rate( (concave, convexconvexnoner /1 /L slops
Subregion (LRR): d Let A/ 4d o -�-� iti i Long: /•� .�' �3 % Debra:
Sol] Map Unit Name: i/" NWI classification: .,-
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site 41W for this tiara of yaarl Yes Pf- No _ (If no, explain in Remade.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly dsturbed? Am'Normal Circumstances' present? You ✓ No
Are Vegetation Sal _ or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If headed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach sits map showing sampling point locations, "nsects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �� No
Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yon No :� the Sampled Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No f/ within a Welland?? d
VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Yee No -�
Tree Stratum (Plot size: A/ 1
t
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover ? Status
Dominance Test wortsheet
Number of Dominant Species )
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC /
(excluding FAC-): (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Spaces Across A8 Strata: / (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, a FAC: (AIB)
2.
3.
4.
Total Cover
SadindShrub Stratum (Plot Sao: /1/7 )
1. _
2.
Prevalence Index worksheat
Total %Cover of Muldoty by:
OBL spades x 1 =
FACW spades x 2 =
FAC spades x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL spades x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
3.
4.
5.
f5 Total Cover
Herb stratum (Plot flea: /d•k�/G I /
t, b %LriN..�.1f -i .:..� • --•� _i •� Z J/�.iCJ
2.
3. FP•n,-_ .h.'S �,� +oaf• S (LPL
4.
b.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indkatars:
t - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
— 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
—3 - Prevalence Index is 93.0'
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegeleoion' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problerna0c.
7.
B.
g
10.
,r �=Total Cover
Woody Mna Stratum (Plotsize: AAA l
2.
HydroPIrYfic
Valistirtion
Prasann Yes Y No
-t::;- = Total Cover
% Bare Ground In Herb Stratum Z 6
Remarks:
W" N„.t „y,,.. Great Plains - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: Z z — 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches) Color% _TeLci �Tex�te Remarks
Hydric Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
_ Histosol(At)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stretilled Layers (AS) (LRR F)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR F, G, H)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (A52)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ 2.5 km Mucky Peat or Peat (S2) (LRR G, H)
— 5 km Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR F)
Type: /fi
Depth (inches}:
marks I!Zo
HYDROLOGY
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox(S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Loamy Gleyed Matrok (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dade Surface (FT)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
High Plains Depressions (F16)
(MIRA 72 & 73 of LRR H)
Grains.location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls :
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR I, J)
Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) (LRR F, G, H)
_ Dark Surface (ST) (LRR G)
_ High Plains Depressions (F16)
(I..RR H outside of MLRA 72 & 73)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless dishabed or problematic.
Hydrlc Soil Present] Yes No/
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check
all that aptly)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Saft Crust (811)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (Bt)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
(where not tilled)
_ Algal Met or Crust (114)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thln Muck Surface (CT)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Surface Water Present? Yea _ No Depth inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Noy Depth inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _ No `Depth inches):
(includes caplllerV fringe)
Desaibe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos
Secondery Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (lib)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
(where tilled)
Crayfish Burrows (08)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
FAO -Neutral Test (135)
_ Frost -Heave Hummocks (DT) (LRR F)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Glsat Plains Region
Project/Site: C r9! 'i f :-::�ir� % CIWA nttl)r, .;G��A1� Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner. Ch'-,_.�.l� .. /A �.�li�1t7..t��"�z�'7 State: Co Sampling Point
Investigator(s): .7 • / tc!�Sec(ion, Township, Range., :?�ZAI C 6lJ 2�
Landfonn (hlllslope. hamace, etc.): i i_Wz,Lv Local relief(concave, cone%, none): n/L I Slope (%): / L
Subregion (LRR): i Let N 41f7 7,5 Lorg:lL%-�DS.O S�} Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Are climatic I hydialoglo condWons on th6/site typical for this time of year? Yes d
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
NMI classification:
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are'Normal Circumstances' present'? Yes i-No
IN needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No is Mu Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Noy within a Wetland? Yoe No Z1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheat
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
% Cover Spedm? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 •
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC i
(excluding FAC-): (A)
Total Number of Dominant
2.
3.
4.
Spades Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: A14X )
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC' Sri i (AB)
1.
2.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW spades x 2 =
FAC spades 4,0 x 3 = / 2 4'
3.
4.
5
d = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plc/t Sim., ' : ��'
FACU species -55_ x 4 =
.r'
I. Cg'f/,A-C:4J d :K
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: _ (A) 2�_ (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 31 5 g
2
.
4.
4
5.
Hydrophytc Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 . Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index Is s9.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting i
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
S
7.
8.
g
10.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
r� =Total Cover
'Indicators
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
8 = Total Cover
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum7
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
SOIL
A i �
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
findrosl (moist) % Color
Redcrx Features
(moist) % SypO_
Texture Remarks
a
'Typw C=Conoonuatio D=De RM-Reduced Menu CS --Coveted m Coaled Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore uni M=Mslnx.
Hydtc Sall Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRe, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrfc Sails":
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ 1 cm Muck (Af)) (LRR I, J)
Histic Eplpedon (A2)
_ Sandy RedDX (S5)
_ Coast Prairie Redax (A16) (LRR F, G. H)
Black Hislic (A3)
_ Stripped Matrix (SB)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR G)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F11)
_ High Plains Depressions (F16)
_ Stratined Layers (AS) (LRR F)
_ Loamy Glayed Matrix (F2)
(LRR H oufaMe of MLRA 72 ti 73)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR F. G. H)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Reduced Vertic IF18)
_ Depleted Sake" Dark Surface (All)
_ Refox Dark Snouts (Ffi)
_ Red Parent Mateial (TF2)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ 2.5 an Mucky Peat or Peal (S2) (LRR G, H)
_ High Plains Depressions (F76)
'Indicators of hydrophy8c vegetation and
_ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR F)
(MLRA 72 8 73 of LRR H)
ws8and hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
RestrltXlve Layer Qf presort):
Type: /r LJriic�
THydric
Depth (inches): A/A
sell Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
that Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two r9QUIMM
primary r..w:.-„ m (.immix, of one ren,irM: check
_ Surface Water (Al)
all wanlvl
_ San Crust (a11)
, Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic lavenebrates (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen SuMde Odor (C7)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_
_ Water Marks (Bl)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
(where tilled)
_
_ Drift Deposits (83)
(when not tilled)
^ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Algal Mal or Crust (54)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
` Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ FAC-Neutral Teal (DS)
_
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No
Depth Cinches):
Water Table Present? Yes _ No
Depth Cinches):
Saturation Present? Yes _ No
Depth (inctlesj Welland Hydrology Present? Yea No
rx'Judes capillsEy M e
Desaibe Recorded Data (stream gskge, monitoring well, aerial photoa, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Great Plain Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Great Plains Region
Propcil do:—Lp� �, !.
i
<-� .i`y(s .
el
> City/County. r�
Applicant/Owner C�llS '
i2/ :.%/�G t�
n-"
9Wr J S ppn6Pdrlt_
Investigalor(s): =�Ki ,T
r' -'�%'
P
Section. Township, Ranger% T 7A.1 R t� (Ji/
Landtorn (hinslops. lenace, e1c.y
'R
Local relief (concave. convex, none j: �!7r ` Slope (%):
n
Subregion (LRR):
Let A/ �ni. :•.�': , h Lot✓'��-T7 . -' i .� Dabam::'y�^
I',
Soil Map Unit Name:
/%Lll� •"/✓✓
NW! classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions
on the site typical for this time of year? Yes /,-�_ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil
or Hydrology _
significantly disturbed? Ani'Normal Circumstances' present? Yea No
Are Vegetation . Sell
. or Hydrology _
naturally problematic? (11 needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: -!/''yJ (✓L-�
VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
��'i
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test woFkahent:
Tree Stratum
(Plot size: 1
L Species? status
Number of Dominant Species
1•
That Are OBL, FACW or FAC
2.
(excluding FAC-): (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Z
3.
4.
Spades Across Ar Strata: (B)
Sapling/Shrub
j=
Stratum (Pad aim
Total Cover
Percent of Dominant Spades
That Are OBL,
FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
2.
Prevalence Index worlaheat:
Total % Cover of Multiply by.,
OBL species x 1 =
FACW spades x 2 =
FAC spades x 3 =
FACU
3
4.
ra
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. J ?i-S"/.
�.c- .%:. _ >r/J�
_
_ - "•
species x 4 =
UPL spades x S .
Column Tatws: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2i?"i
3.
4.
6
Hydrophytic Vagetadon Indlutons:
— f - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
—2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
—3 . Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adoplabons' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
s.
7.
9.
10.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Woody Ans Stratum
��
4
= Total Cover
'
(Pbt size:
Indicators of hydre soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic_
2.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Total Carer
% Bare Ground
in Herb Stratum
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
VJ NIII� UAr/Y V� i:lla�l lOOli
Great Plaims -Version 2.D
SOIL
Sampling Point:L
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth matrix
Redox
Gnchesl Solo (mots@ _ % Color
fmolst) %_ e� �o _
Texture Remarks
'Type: C-Concentration D-Deplation. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Groins. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Solt Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls :
_ Hlstosol (Al)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ 1 an Muck (A9) (LRR 1, J)
_ Histic Epipedxm (A2)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Coast Prairie Radox (A16) (LRR F, G, H)
_ Black Hisbc (A3)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR G)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
_ High Plains Depressions (F1 B)
_ Stratified Layers (AS) (LRR F)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(LRR H outside of MLRA 72 8 73)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR F, G, H)
_ gepleted Matrix (F3)
_ Reduced Verdc (1718)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
VRedox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Matedal (TF2)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (fF12)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Redox Depressions (Fill
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ 2.5 on Mucky Peat or Peat (S2) (LRR G, H)
_ High Plains Depressions (F16)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ 5 an Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR F)
(MLRA 72 & 73 of LRR H)
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (H present):
Type:"
Depth (inches): _ �O
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Primary indictors (minimum of one
reeulred7 check all that atwN)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Salt crust (B11)
_ Surface Sail Cracks(66)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic invertebrates (12113)
S/pe rsely Vegetated Cmcave Surface (BB)
�turation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sutfde Odor (CI)
�
�Drainags Patterns (B10)
_ Water Marks (81)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Rods (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Oxkiized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) (where tilled)
Drift Deposits (83)
(where not tilled)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=' Geomorphic Position (02)
_ Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (137) _ Other (Explaln In Remarks)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F)
Field Observations -
Surface Water Present? Yes
Surface
_ No Y Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth pnches):
Saturation Present? Yes
_ _'
_✓ No _ Depth (inches): G
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary trinoel
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, mondoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Great Plains Region
Project/Site: -- i `- "�.. fi Cou
MY Sampling Date:_
Applicant/Owner ii .-�7" ri -� Sw :ee-) Sampling Pant t✓'
investigator(s): Section. Township.
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc) / id/zr T f ,r' Local relief (concave, convex, nonex Slope my QLFs—
Subregion (LRR): t5l Let l ". j =
t " � Lang: ltr�..%-?�3 Dawta:
Soli Map Unit Name: NWI classification: 'P/sd / 0
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Ara'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil - Or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features. etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes t/ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology PreserW Yea No within a Wetland? Yee No
Remarks: / - -.--
vtcse I A I iuN — use scienutic names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: / 1' 1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Spades? Sites
Dominance Test woAuheat.
Number of Dominant Spades
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): �_ (A)
2.
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (g)
Percent of Dominant Spades
Total Cover
SaollndStuub Stratum (Plot size: 0e
/ )
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (q/g)
1. �% - �.y: .cis-�,.,en� �d?
2.
_1,L/
Prevalence Index worinheat
Total % Cover of. Multiply by-
OBL species x 1 =
FACW spades x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU
3.
4.
S.
Total Cover
Herbstratum (Plot sbm: �h �`� 1
spades x 4 =
1•
UPLspedes x5=
Column Totals: (A) (g)
2• n'
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4 ✓ '
��LL GL1�
517
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indlcatora:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
8
B
8
10.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Fxlolain)
Z� = Total Cover
,f �A
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: /v/ 1
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
1,
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
f✓� ,
c^ = Total Cover
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
Present? Yea No
Remarks: ' /
P-3: W-3 — Shallow Drainage
P-1: W-1 — Borrow Ditch
P-2: W-2 — Depression
PHOTO APPENDIX: PHOTOS TAKEN AUGUST 23, 2013 AT THE CAPSTONE COTTAGES
PROJECT SITE
TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF PERTINENT VEGETATED WETLAND CHARACTERISTICS
(No Other Waters of the U. S. Were Observed on Site)
Feature
Name
Cowardin
Classification
Dominant
S ecies
Acreage
(ac.)
Hydrologic
Connection
Sample Points/
Photos
Vegetated
Wetlands
W-1
Borrow Ditch
PEM1B
Apca. Tyla, Caem
0.18
None observed
CC-1/P-1
W-2
Depression
PEM1Y
Juco
0.02
None observed
CC-5/P-2
W-3
Shallow Drainage
PFO1/PEM1Y
Pode, Apca, Juco
0.02
None observed
CC-7/P-3
TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF SAMPLE POINT CHARACTERISTICS
Sample
Point #
Dominant
Species
Hydric
Soil Indicators
Primary & Secondary Wetland
Hydrology Indicator(s)
COE
Wetland
CC-1
Apca, Tyla, Caem
F6
A3, B10, D-2
PEMiB
CC-2
Chna, Brin
None
None
No
CC-3
Ivxa, Basi
None
None
No
CC-4
Juba
None
None
No
CC-5
Juco
F6
A2 (seasonal) B10, D2
PEM1Y
CC-6
Pasm
None
None
No
CC-7
Pode. Apca, Juco
F6
B1, B10, D2
PFO1/PEM1Y
point CC-1 has matrix chroma colors and mottling sufficient to qualify as a redox dark surface. Wetland
hydrology indicators included saturation, drainage pattern, and geomorphic position. (This borrow ditch
was classed as non -jurisdictional by the Corps as a result of a previous mapping effort.)
W-2: Depression (PEM1 Y; Photo 2)
Sample point CC-5 was selected to characterize a group of small herbaceous wetlands located
along the eastern project area border. The vegetation community is dominated by Baltic rush with upland
plant species making up a small percentage of the absolute cover. The matrix and mottle content of the
matrix to a depth of 18 inches qualifies for a redox dark surface classification. Wetland hydrology
indicators include a suitable drainage pattern and geomorphic position. Given the depression form, a
shallow depth to a high water table is assumed based on the NRCS soils mapping.
W-3: Shallow drainage (PFO1/PEMY1; Photo 3)
This wetland has become established in a narrow, comparatively short and shallow drainage along
the eastern project area border. Wetland W-3 is characterized by dominant species in the herbaceous,
shrub, and tree strata and is classed as PFO/PEM1Y to account for this diversity (sample point CC-7).
The dominant species are plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides — FAC), dogbane, and round -fruit rush
(Juncus cornpressus— FACW). A redox dark surface wetland indicator was noted for the soil matrix and
wetland hydrology indicators included water marks, drainage patterns, and a geomorphic position.
I trust this letter report will fulfill your needs with respect to wetland and other Waters of the U. S.
delineation requirements. We request that you evaluate our delineation report with a view to considering
it accurate and complete. Please call (970-229-9278) if you have any questions regarding the delineation
work completed for this project.
Sincerely,
CEDAR CRr- ,, ASSOCIA,TES,INC.
Stephen G. Long
Principal
3
included the presence of a histic epipedon, thick dark surface, redox features, gleying, depleted or
reduced profile conditions, and high organic matter content and/or a stripped matrix in sandy soils.
Potential wetland hydrology indicators included geomorphic position, presence of standing water and/or
saturated soil profile conditions, drainage patterns, sediment deposits, water marks, and oxidized root
channels in the upper 12 inches of the soil profile. Sample holes were dug to a depth of 16 inches unless
a restrictive layer was encountered. Formal field data sheets were completed for each sample point
evaluated (CC-1 through CC-7). Wetland / upland boundaries and sample points were flagged with pink
fluorescent tape and numbered orange pin flags tied with pink fluorescent tape, respectively, for
subsequent surveying work. No open water features were encountered
Adjunct test holes were also dug, where appropriate, to gain additional vegetation, soil, and
hydrologic information used to aid in the characterization of wetlands, uplands, and transition zones.
Data sheets were not completed for test holes.
The wetland delineation wetland/upland borders and sample pit sites were surveyed in on February
18, 2014,
The results of the field delineation are summarized in the following paragraphs. Copies of the data
sheets completed during the survey along with a delineation map and photos are included with this report
to aid the Corps in completing an evaluation of this project site. Tables T-1 and T-2 are presented to
support the report text.
Proiect Area Characteristics
Results - Uplands and Upland Transition Sites
The project area was once a farmstead. At this time, the buildings have been removed and the
fields have reverted primarily to a mixture of localized upland vegetation communities occurring across a
nearly level topography with a few shallow, dry, drainage inclusions. A prairie dog colony occurs over a
significant portion of the project area.
Herbaceous shrub, and tree species have become established on site and are variably dominant
depending upon the vegetation community under consideration. Native, introduced, and weedy species
are represented. Dominant and other notable species include cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum - UPL),
western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii - FACU), slender wheatgrass - Elymus trachycaulus - FACU)
smooth brome (Bromopsis inermis - UPL), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea - FACU), kochia (Bassia
sieversiana - FACU). alfalfa (Medicago sativa - UPL), Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila - UPL). Sample point
CC-2 (paired with CC-1) and CC-6 (paired with CC-7) were selected to characterize upland wetland
borders. Dominant species included western wheatgrass and smooth brome. No wetland soil or
hydrology indicators were observed.
Two upland transition sites were also mapped and described in the project area indicating, along
with the wetland descriptions below, a project site that is believed to be drying. Sample point CC-3 is
dominated by marsh elder (Cyclathaena xanthiifolia - FAC) and kochia while sample point CC-4 is
dominated by Baltic rush (Juncus balticus - FACW). While hydric-classed species are dominant, all or in
part at these sample points, no evidence of wetland soils or hydrology was observed. Therefore, these
vegetation communities are considered to be upland transition sites.
Results - Vegetated Wetlands
Three types of wetlands, W-1, W-2, and W-3, were delineated within the project area boundaries and
are characterized below. It may be noted that while hydric soils were present at the sample points
selected to describe these wetlands, the wetland indicators for wetland types W-2 and W-3 were weak
indicating a drying trend across this project site.
W-1: Borrow Ditch (PEM1B; Photo P-1)
This wetland is typified by a vegetation community dominated by cattails (Tyla latifolia - OBL,
dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum- FAC), and Emory sedge (Carex emoryi - OBL). The soil at sample
2
cinkm
k2m®(C, INC.
916 Willshire Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80521 (970) 493-4394
Mr. Terry McKee
Department of the Army
Corps of Engineers, Omaha District
Denver Regulatory Office
9307 South Wadsworth Blvd
Littleton, Colorado 80128-6901
February 18, 2014
Re: Waters of the U. S. Delineation for the Capstone Cottages Project (No Corps Number
Assigned to Date)
Dear Mr. McKee:
At the direction of Capstone Collegiate Communities, Cedar Creek Associates, Inc. completed a
wetland and Other Waters of the U. S. delineation for the Capstone Cottages Project within the city limits
of Fort Collins, Colorado. The project area is situated along Lincoln Avenue in Section 7, Township 7
North, Range 68 West (N 40.58982, W.-105.05337, NAD 83).
The primary objective of this work is to develop the project area to provide campus housing
opportunities for students. The objective of the delineation work is to fulfill the requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act regarding the delineation of wetlands and other Waters of the U. S. prior to
potential development activities.
The vicinity map included with this submittal depicts the road network providing access to the site.
The main project contacts are: Mr. John Acken
Capstone Collegiate Communities
431 Office Park Drive
Birmingham, Alabama 35223
Phone: 205.414.6400
email: igcken@capstonemail.com
Ms. Linda Ripley
Ripley Design, Inc.
401 West Mountain Ave., Suite 100
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521-2604
Phone:970-224-5828
Email: linda.ripley@ripleydesign.com
lZiNIP14=o EiTANH41J,.... .
Wetland delineation and sampling work for the wetlands and open water features within the project
area was completed on August 23, 2013 using the methods and techniques specified for "routine on -site
delineations" in the publication Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Department of the Army
1987), supplemented by the document Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual. Great Plains Region - Version 2.0 (Department of the Army 2010). The project area
was evaluated and potential wetland, transition zone, and upland vegetation communities were identified.
Using the three -parameter approach, via test hole characteristics, the wetland/upland boundaries were
flagged. Formal sample point locations were then identified. Sample point locations were selected to
represent typical wetland, upland and transitional conditions on site.
At each sample point, percent total cover of dominant plant species was estimated. Species were
then classed as OBL (obligate wetland species), FACW (facultative wetland species), FAC (facultative
species), FACU (facultative upland species) or UPL (upland species). Wetland soil indicators potentially
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT
DENVER REGULATORY OFFICE, 9307 SOUTH WADSWORTH BOULEVARD
LITTLETON, COLORADO 80129-6901
February 25, 2014
Mr. Steve Long
Cedar Creek Associates, Inc.
916 Willshire Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80521
RE: Wetland Delineation for the Capstone Cottages Project, Wetlands W-1, W-2 and W-3
Corps File No. 200680088
Dear Mr. Long:
Mr. Terry McKee of my office has reviewed your February 18, 2014 wetland delineation report
and map for this project located at 40.58982;-105.05337, Larimcr County, Colorado. Mr. McKee
considers your wetland report and map for this project accurate and acceptable.
If any work associated with this project requires the placement of dredged or fill material, and
any excavation associated with a dredged or fill project into wetlands WI, W2 and W-3, this office
should be notified by a proponent of the project for Department of the Army permits or changes in permit
requirements pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Work in wetlands W I, W2 and W-3 should be identified and shown on a map identifying the
Latitude and Longitude in decimal degrees (example 40.55555;-104.55555) and the dimensions of work
in wetlands WI, W2 and W-3. Any loss of an aquatic site may require mitigation. Mitigation
requirements will be determined during the Department of the Army permitting review.
The Omaha District, Regulatory Branch is committed to providing quality and timely service to
our customers. In an effort to improve customer service, please take a moment to complete our Customer
Service Survey found on our website at http://pert.nwp.usace.army.mil/survey.htmi. If you do not have
Internet access, you may call and request a paper copy of the survey that you can complete and return to
us by mail or fax. (Completing the survey is a voluntary action)
If there are any questions call Mr. Terry McKee at (720) 922-3851 and reference Corps No.
200680088.
in erel ,
Kie Downin
Chief, Denver Regulatory Office