The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2590 MIDPOINT DRIVE - PDP - PDP160010 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSComment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05/10/2016: The area labeled as recycle asphalt appears to be storage area. Please include screening around this entire area. RESPONSE: We have provided landscape and labeled the two existing fences. The Liberty Commons fence is 6' tall solid wood and the fence along the LEI property line is also 6' tall solid cedar fence. 04/12/2016: Please identify the fence material of the existing fence? Will it provide screening? Is it more than chain link? 7 Easement. RESPONSE: The easements and right-of-way notes have been coordinated with the civil plans so all labels read the same. All easements will be by separate document and will be provided at Final. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/13/2016 05/17/2016: Please change to Lot 18 on all sheets. RESPONSE: Title changed. 04/13/2016: Please add Lot 18, Prospect Industrial Park" to the title block. RESPONSE: Title changed. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/17/2016 05/17/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat, or documentation needs to be provided for easements recorded after the Subdivision Plat was recorded. RESPONSE: All of the easements and right-of-way will be dedicated by separate document Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson(aDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/11/2016 04/11/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmogen(&fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05/18/2016: I've noted that the service has been changed to 4" and can connect to the main via wye. This requires a minimum slope of 2% (1% is proposed). RT RESPONSE: Pipe slope has been updated to 2%. inverts adjusted accordingly. 04/12/2016: A 6" sanitary service connection into an 8" main requires either connecting at a manhole or cutting in a tee. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05/18/2016: Please see updated redlined report and plans and returnwith resubmittal. RT RESPONSE: Understood and Noted 04/12/2016: Please see redlines and return with resubmittal. Comment Number: 7 05/18/2016: Comment still applies. RT RESPONSE: Understood and Noted Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 04/12/2016: Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming upon future submittals as additional details are discovered. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals(ci>fcgov.com Topic: General C 04/13/2016: Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88 - X.XX�,. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/13/2016 05/17/2016: This has not been completely corrected. RT RESPONSE: Sheet titles have been updated on Cover Sheet to match corresponding pages. 04/13/2016: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/13/2016 05/17/2016: This has not been corrected. RT RESPONSE: Benchmark has been updated to match cover sheet with correct equation. 04/13/2016: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/13/2016 05/17/2016: There are line over text issues. See Redlines RT RESPONSE: Line over text issues have been resolved. 04/13/2016 There are line over text issues. See Redlines Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 04/13/2016 05/17/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat, or documentation needs to be provided for easements recorded after the Subdivision Plat was recorded. RT RESPONSE: Existing easements are called out, proposed easements will be filed under different document. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/11/2016 05/17/2016: Please change to Lot 18 on all sheets. RESPONSE: Title changed. 05/17/2016: Please add Lot 18, Prospect Industrial Park" to the title block. RESPONSE: Title changed. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/11/2016 05/17/2016: There is no change, and no response was received. 04/13/2016: Please provide information documenting a 9' Utility Easement along Midpoint Drive. The Plat shows a 6' Utility I: 05/18/2016: Please see updated redlined plans and drainage report. Please return with resubmittal. RT RESPONSE: Understood and Noted 04/12/2016: Please see redlined plans and drainage report. Please return with resubmittal. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05/18/2016: Comment still applies. RT RESPONSE: Understood and Noted 04/12/2016: Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming upon future submittals as additional details are discovered. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/18/2016 05/18/2016: Are any plantings proposed within the proposed rain gardens? It appears that sod is proposed for the southern rain garden, please note that sod cannot be used in this location and will need to be seeded if grass is desired. Please also remove the weed barrier from the northern rain garden. RESPONSE: The Landscape Plans have been updated per the Rain Garden footprint. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/18/2016 05/18/2016: Please provide a drainage easement for the proposed rain gardens and detention basins at least up to the 100-year water surface elevation. RESPONSE: The Drainage Easement will be recorded under separate instrument for the 100-year water surface elevation, and this has been noted on the Drainage Plan. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/18/2016 05/18/2016: Overall, it appears that the proposed design is acceptable; however, expanded narrative in the report and additional detail in the plans are needed in order to better understand the proposed conditions and how the system overall will function. RESPONSE: The Narrative of the existing and proposed improvements has been expanded. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischlam0fcnov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 05/16/2016: Erosion Control Plan had a minor redline on the details page. Erosion Control Report was not found in the supplied documents. Erosion control escrow Calculation was not found in the supplied document as well. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com RT RESPONSE: Detail has been corrected. 03/29/2016: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan (based upon redlines), Erosion Control Report (Based upon comments returned to the planner on 3/29/2016) , and an Escrow / Security Calculation (with the correct method for calculating an escrow see redline comments in the report). If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty(c�fcaov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/13/2016 05/17/2016: Please correct the equation as marked. See redlines. RT RESPONSE: Equation has been corrected 4 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmonen(a)-fcoov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05/18/2016: Please expand report narrative to explain the proposed scenario with the northern detention pond. Will the outlet structure need to be modified? If so, provide detail. Please also show proposed grading in this area. 04/12/2016: It is noted that Basin 1 will be sharing a detention basin with the adjacent property. It doesn't appear that easement will be required as the properties are owned by the same party. Please document the required volume for the adjacent property or include in the basin sizing calculations. RESPONSE: This section has been updated to explain the existing pond and structure and what will need to be completed to the structure to accommodate the additional pond. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05/18/2016: Comment still applies. Slight discrepancies are seen, likely due to the equation used (see redlines). RESPONSE: Updated as requested. 04/12/2016: Please review the time of concentration and associated rainfall intensities using in the runoff calculations. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05/18/2016: Please provide historic basin calculations to support the proposed release rate. RESPONSE: Updated as requested. 04/12/2016: What is sub -basin P1? It is seen in the calculations, but other references remain unseen. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05/18/2016: Comment still applies. RESPONSE: This has been revised to clearly indicate either developed or pre -developed. 04/12/2016: How was the designed outfall rate of 0.14 cfs/acre determined? Please show calculation for 2-year historic runoff rate. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05/18/2016: Comment still applies. RESPONSE: 2-year historic calculations have been included. 04/12/2016: Please expand the drainage report narrative overall to give a better understanding of the proposed development. A number of things are currently unclear with the project including how the LID requirements are being met and what is ultimately being proposed for the 2 detention basins. Are both water quality and LID being proposed for the detention basin bottoms? Please expand to help clarify the overall design. Comment Number: 11 05/18/2016: Please see redlined table. RESPONSE: Updated as requested. Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 04/12/2016: Please discuss and document how LID requirements are being met. A table would be helpful for this and a sample table can be downloaded at: http://tinyurl.com/SampleLIDTable. RT RESPONSE: AN updated LID Table has been included in the Drainage Report. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 3 05/16/2016: Thank you for including the interior landscaping calculation on the landscape plan. Because the landscape islands near the overhead door entrances have been removed, the landscape plan does not meet the interior parking lot requirements. Have you considered removing one of the 20 parking spaces to satisfy the interior landscaping requirement? If the site can not meet the code requirement, a request for a modification of standard will be required. RESPONSE: As discussed in our staff review meeting, we have added an additional area for landscape so we now meet this code section. We have revised the calculation accordingly. 04/12/2016: The response letter indicated that there is a calculation showing that 6% of the parking lot interior is devoted to landscaping. I don't see that on the landscape plan. Please include this calculation. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Sexton, 970-221-6501, ksexton(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/17/2016 05/17/2016: Please include LCUASS driveway detail 707.1 RESPONSE: Detail has been added to the plans. Department: Internal Services Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter(cDfcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/17/2016 05/17/2016: Please schedule a pre -submittal meeting for this project. Pre -Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid -design stage for this meeting to be effective. Applicants of new projects should email scarter@fcgov.com to schedule a pre -submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/17/2016 05/17/2016: Construction shall comply with adopted codes as amended. Current adopted codes are: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com/building web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use Commercial: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. RT RESPONSE: Understood and Noted Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/17/2016 05/17/2016: Prescriptive energy compliance with increased insulation values is required for buildings using electric heat. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. 2 Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/devetopmentreview May 20, 2016 Cathy Mathis TB GROUP 444 MOUNTAIN AVENUE Berthoud, CO 80525 RE: 2590 Midpoint Drive, PDP160010, Round Number Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Meaghan Overton, at 970-416-2283 or moverton@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Meaghan Overton, 970-416-2283, moverton(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016 05120/2016: Because the applicant isn't sure exactly what will be stored in the storage area yet, the screening as it's shown now will be sufficient. Just be sure°the existing fencing is shown on the site plan along with the landscaping. Any materials stored in the storage area must be completely screened from view. In the future, should there be any complaints or issues, the owner may need to add more screening. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. The two existing fences have been labeled on the site and landscape plans. Both are 6' tall and made of wood or cedar. 05/16/2016: Please see comment from zoning regarding the required screening of the storage area. 04/12/2016: What is the intended use of the asphalt area at the back of the site? Additional screening may be required. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/20/2016 05/20/2016: After discussion at staff review, departments with outstanding comments agreed that the project is close to being ready for hearing. I will coordinate a final round of electronic review to address any outstanding comments/issues prior to hearing. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Thank you. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/12/2016