The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTOWNHOMES AT LIBRARY PARK - FDP - FDP140014 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS (4)The services will be placed in the public Utility Easement running separate service. down the center of the project. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/27/2015 05/27/2015: The west side of Lot 10 will have to have a utility easement since there is electrical feeding to the meter. This should be symmetrical to Lot 1 where there is a utility easement on the west side. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/27/2015 05/27/2015: The electrical line running south off of Lot 10 to the electric vault 'EV' does not exist and needs to be removed. This vault does not exist. The service is being fed from a secondary box in the alley which is coming off of an open delta bank transformer set located in Right of Way across the alley. Comment Number: 7 This electric vault is proposed for this project and will need to be installed. 05/27/2015: Gas needs to maintain a minimum distance of 3 ft separation. Right now the drawings only show 2 ft separation on the west side of the buildings. The gas and electric are spaced at the minimum distance of 3 feet Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/27/2015 05/27/2015: Before electrical design can be started, Light & Power will need the following information. Acknowledged. -Approved Plat -Approved Site Plan -Utility Plan -Landscape Plan -AutoCAD drawings of Utility & Site Plan -Who the invoice will be billed to. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, Icounty(�fcQov.com Topic: Plat Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: Please make the changes to the Owner & Lienholder signature blocks as marked. See redlines. Changes have made to these blocks. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: Please add new title commitment information if available. A new title commitment will be updated prior to mylars. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: Please label the easement along the alley on Lot 1. Is this part of the Private Access & Maintenance Easement? See redlines. These easement have been labeled. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: All easements must be labeled & locatable. See redlines. See revised plans for easement callouts Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate document must be added prior to mylars. Reception numbers will be added prior to mylars Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: Please increase the text size of the easement dimensions. See redlines. The text size has been increased. 3 06/11/2014: The placement of storm drain lines along Olive Street and Mathews Street right-of-way appear to be private and if so would not be allowed to be placed in right-of-way. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/11/2014 O8/13/2014: Will need to check with Martina. O6/11/2014: I'll defer to Traffic Operations, but the placement of the eastem-most diagonal (handicap) parking along Olive Street appears to be too close to the crosswalk and would result in backup maneuvers onto the crosswalk. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: There are discrepancies between the documents (civil, site and plat) regarding the dedication of easement types within the platted boundary. The plat shows a 20 foot private access & maintenance easement along the middle of the property and a 5 foot private access easement along the northern boundary. The civil plan call this out respectively as a 20 foot utility and private access easement and a 5 foot utility and private access easement. The site plan calls out a 20 foot private access and maintenance easement, but then doesn't call out the 5 foot easement. Please look to have this coordinated. With the civil plan calling out utility easement as one of the easement types, is this intended to be a private utility easement, as this could otherwise be conveyed on the plat itself. Overall, I'll be curious to see how these (presumably) private easement are able to be 'conveyed' at this time as I didn't think easement can be conveyed when the grantor and grantee are presumably the same entity. The Plat has been revised and both civil and site plans Topic: Plat have been adjusted to match the plat Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/11/2014 06/02/2015: Seeing that the plat also calls out a 5 foot private access easement by separate, we'll also need to track the providing of the recording/reception number information prior to filing of the plat. In looking at this further, I think the comment originally below of calling out the private access easement as an exemption to easement dedicated to the City should just be removed at this point since its dedication is occurring by separate document anyway. Otherwise though, the dedication statement should perhaps be further revised to call out the private access easement. O8/13/2014: With the response indicating that it is to be recorded by separate document, the plat should be providing recordation/reception number information. 06/11/2014: The 20' "private access & maintenance easement" would need to called out as an exemption to the certificate of dedication for easements conveyed to the City. This would need to be a private easement not conveyed to the City. The private easement will be recorded prior to mylar of the plat. They have been removed from the exemptions portion of the text. Department: Light And Power Contact: Todd Vedder, 970-224-6152, tvedder@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/27/2015 05/27/2015: Since each town home is located on its own separate lot, there will have to be a common easement provided in order to have all the meters gained on one end of the building. Otherwise each town home will have to have its own Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 P/ NJ E FJ 773 C- a n M EN i J 970.224,6134 - fax fcgov.corn/developmentreview July 02, 2015 Brad Florin ' 0 NOCO Townhomes, Inc. � � 1.7 Its' P.O. Box 270070 Fort Collins, CO 80527 RE: Townhomes at Library Park - Final Plan, FDP140014, Round Number 3 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343ortshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 06/02/2015 06/02/2015: Please add LCUASS detail 1601 to the details sheet. Note that there has been an update to LCUASS construction details per the following link: (http://Iarimer.org/engineering/G MARdStds/2014%2OChang es/Standard_Drawi ngs.html). Details have been added Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/11/2014 06/02/2015: I'd suggest adding the reception number to the documents with it already having been recorded (civil and site plan). The Reception No. has been added. 08/13/2014: Wasn't this completed and recorded? 06/11/2014: There now needs to be an easement obtained from the property owner to the north for the work occurring on their property depicted on the landscape plan and grading sheet of the civil set. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/11/2014 06/02/2015: The response indicates a variance has been submitted, was this provided? I'm not finding anything in the resubmittal.08/13/2014: Carried over pending further review. A formal variance has not been submitted. An option was agreed upon through exhibit. A formal variance will be prepared and submitted.