The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWINDSONG AT ROCK CREEK - FDP - FDP160010 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS03/30/2016: Please show all monuments as found or set. See redlines. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: If the Eye Center Of Northern Colorado plat is filed before this, please make changes as shown. See redlines. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: All easements must be labeled & locatable. See redlines. Response: Reception numbers yet to be assigned Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: No comments. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221.6887, mwilkinson(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated 03/30/2016: Sheet 18 - for the EB turn lane on Rock Creek Drive, there should be two left turn arrows, one at start of full turn lane, and the other as shown. The arrows should be preformed thermoplastic, not paint. Response: Addressed Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargueapfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated 03/3012016: The proposed 24-inch water line connection to the existing main in Ziegler needs to be north of the connection valve with FCLWD. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated 03/30/2016. Water lines that are crossing under other utilities greater than 24 inches need to be sleeved. Please provide the sleeving detail in the plans as well. Response: detail and casing added. 03/30/2016 03/30/2016 03/30/2016 9 Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016: There are sheet number issues. See redlines. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 18 03/30/2016: There are cut off text issues. See redlines. Response: Addressed Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 11 03/3012016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: These issues have been corrected. Comment Number: 12 03/30/2016 03/30/2016 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Response: The hatch has been removed to correct this issue. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Please make sure all plat language is the most current City language. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Are there any Lienholders for this property? If so, please add a signature block. If not, please add a note stating there are none, and include response in written comments. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Does the South Fort Collins Sanitation District need to sign? Response: Awaiting South Fort Collins Sanitation District response. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliquot comers shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at *county()Jcgov.com Response: Addressed Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Please add dedication information for all street rights of way. See redlines. Response: More research needed Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Please show tie bearing as noted in the legal description. See redlines. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 8 03/30/2016: Please label longitudinal slope of the detention pond bottoms. Response: Added longitudinal slope arrows for detention Pond A. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Please label public or private for all storm sewers on the storm sewer plan & profile sheets. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/3012016: Please add a pond summary tables to the Drainage Plan. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Please add a detention pond depth gauge to the main pond. Response: Detail and location added to plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: The pavers appear to have a greater area draining over them than 3:1 when the roof area in that particular basin is included in the run-on calculation. Additional pavers may be required to lower the run-on area or a revision of sub -basins. Response: Pavers along north end of site have been removed and roof runoff is now being treated by sand filters. See LID plan for additional info. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/3012016: Is any erosion protection required at the pipe outlets? Response: Riprap added see calculations in drainage report. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03130/2016: The WQ outlet structure needs to be modified due to no standard WQ being provided. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Please label that seed is required on top of the soft pan and label. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016. Please provide the sand filter detail from Urban Drainage. Response: Addressed Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, 'count fc ov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 13 03/30/2016: No comments. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03130/2016: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Addressed 7 Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT & FIRE ENGINE/AMBULANCE ACCESS TO FRONT DOOR The EAE stub on the south side may be omitted however the issue of engine and ambulance response to this facility does not appear to have been addressed yet. A parking/staging area should be provided for near the front door for emergency services responding to medical calls. Response: Emergency access easement on the south side removed. Onsite emergency access easement extended west to provide staging area near entry. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016. FIRE LANE SIGNAGE Fire lane - No Parking signs will be required along the fire lane. Locations should be shown on the Signage and Striping Plans. Code language provided below. Response: Parking signs added along fire lanes. > IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING - FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischlam(a)fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/08/2016 03/08/2016: Erosion Control Report and Plans have redlines that will need to be addressed. 12/07/2015: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ ischlam(a)fcgov.com Response: Addressed Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargueMcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: The porous paver underdrain needs to be extended to capture a greater area of the paver section. Also, please show cleanout locations. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 3 11 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 Department: Light And Power Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: Light & Power will have to extend electric facilities along the N. side of Rock Creek Dr. from Technology Parkway to feed this site. Power into this site will come from the Southeast corner of the site and extend North through this site to feed the future parcel to the North. With the nearest electric facilities at the Northwest corner of Rock Creek & Technology Pkwy providing temporary construction power to this site will be problematic until the permanent system can be installed. Response: Noted Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: Transformer location looks good. Thank you. Response: Noted Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: A C-1 Form and a One -line diagram will need to be submitted to Light & Power Engineering for review. Please click on the following link for the C-1 Form. http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo rms-guidelines-regulations Resoonse Noted Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: Electric Capacity Fee and Building Site charges will apply to this development. Please click on the following link for Estimated Light & Power charges and the Light & Power Fee calculator. http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investmen t-development-fees Response: Noted Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: Please contact Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 221-6700. Please reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at hfto://www.fcaov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers. Response: Noted Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: A CAD version of the APPROVED Site & Utility plan must be submitted to CJHousley@fcgov.com before any electric design can begin. Response. Noted Department: PFA 5 Planning's build -to lines under the Land Use Code? Response: All lots east of Windsong should be able to meet 25' build -to line. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016: The plat language on the cover sheet appears to be outdated and will need to be updated to our current requirements. I can email the current version separately. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016: The plat language on the cover sheet appears to be outdated and will need to be updated to our current requirements. I can email the current version separately. Response: Addressed Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverettea()fc_qov.com Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 1 03/29/2016 03/29/2016 Comment Originated: 03/23/2016 03/23/2016: Please provide a revised lighting plan that responds to the following comment provided during the PDP review: "l2/09/2015: For the light fixtures, please clarify the intended color temperature for each fixture. The labels do not appear to match up between the lighting plan and the cut sheets that were provided. Cooler color temperatures are harsher at night and cause more disruption to circadian rhythms for both humans and wildlife. Please use warmer color temperature options (2700K or 3000K) for the LED light fixtures. Please also consider fixtures with dimming capabilities." Response: Addressed Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221.6361, tuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: Continued: 12/23/2015: A redbud tree is shown in the parking lot peninsula at the North East section of the project. The Land Use code standard is for use of canopy shade tree in these parking lot locations. Please review this landscape area for a canopy shade tree. Response: The redbud tree has been replaced with a canopy shade tree. On previous plan the planter island was of insufficient area to accommodate a shade tree. 4 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: There appears to have been a change between PDP to Final regarding the widths of the sidewalks on Ziegler Road (from 6 feet to 7 feet) and Rock Creek Drive (from 5 feet to 6 feet). Just wondering how this came about (and perhaps I may have not recalled a conversation regarding the increase in sidewalk widths.) The street classifications for Ziegler and Rock Creek have sidewalk width requirements of 6 feet and 5 feet respectively. The additional 1 foot provided on both streets would not be eligible for street oversizing reimbursement and with that in mind, I would question perhaps whether the additional width adds much value to the pedestrian given proposed (Eye Center), to be constructed (Mainstreet) and existing (Intel) sidewalks on Ziegler Road are at 6 feet, and similarly existing sidewalk along Rock Creek is 5 feet. Response: Sidewalk was widened to 7 per Sheri Langenberger comment 08/07/15. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: The construction of directional access ramps at the Rock Creek/Ziegler intersection abutting the site is not depicted on the plans and needs to be designed on the civil plans from both a horizontal and vertical perspective with spot elevations, grades, widths, etc. The access ramps need to show how they align with existing crosswalks across Rock Creek and Ziegler. Additionally the access ramps and sidewalk system need to show how they function in relation to existing infrastructure (or relocated infrastructure accordingly) -- there appears to be the existing signal pole that would be in conflict with the sidewalk design, as well as an existing control box that's not depicted on the plans and may be in conflict as well. Response: Ramp added per LCUASS detail 1604, existing infrastructure will remain in place. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: A receiving access ramp needs to be provided on the east side of the private drive intersecting Rock Creek Drive, designed on the civil plans and depicted on the plans. Response: Ramp Added Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: A $250 deed of dedication Transportation Development Review Fee is needed with the offsite drainage easement, with the actual dedication needing to be provided along with recording fees prior to approval of the plans. SFCSD's approval of their easement and recordation needs to similarly occur prior to plan approval (with reception numbers on both easements indicated on the subdivision plat). If the boundary of the drainage easement is considered in its final form with Stormwater, the legal description for the drainage easement can be reviewed by Technical Services. Since the SFCSD easement isn't conveyed to the City, fees and review of the easement isn't required. Response: Noted Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/2912016: Does the offsite drainage pipe and its associated easement potentially make it more difficult for future properties to the east to meet 3 03/30/2016: Please add all signature blocks and standard notes to the site plan cover sheet and label site, landscape, architectural, lighting sheets sequentially. I can provide standard notes in a word document. Response: Addressed Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata(a)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: The private drive intersecting Rock Creek Drive should not be built as a public street intersection, which is implied with the cross plan depicted on the plans and the inclusion of LCUASS Detail 708. This driveway should be depicted and built either as LCUASS 707.1 or 707.2, utilizing concrete fully in the right-of-way. (It would seem that 707.1 could be the design parameter with less concrete along the curb returns.) Response: Redesigned per LCUASS 707.1 Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: 1 don't believe the traffic control sheets should be part of the civil plan set (unless otherwise desired by Traffic Operations) and should be removed. Response: Removed from Utility Plans Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: On Sheet 4 of the civil plans please add the following information to Note #1 referenced for the street cuts to Rock Creek Drive: "Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards." I will look to get input on the approximate patching limits depicted, as the oddity of the striping for Rock Creek Drive would appear to make defining the patching more difficult. Sheet 5 also needs the same note for the street cut shown to Precision Drive. Note that the street cut to Precision Drive will require a triple penalty fee in addition to the typical street cut fee due to the roadway being new. Response: Addressed Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/29/2016 03/29/2016: There doesn't appear to be grading information for the offsite utility work shown on Sheet 17 (or perhaps the site is very flat?) Regardless contour elevation information and complete contours themselves should be depicted. Response: Addressed 2 City of Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax tcgov. com/developmentreview April 01, 2016 Tim Halopoff JR ENGINEERING 2900 SOUTH COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 3D Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Windsong at Rock Creek, FDP160010, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepardajcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: We will need a Lighting Plan prior to mylars to confirm final compliance and to make sure that for L.E.D. fixtures, the Kelvin temperatures do not exceed a range of 2,700 and 3,000 degrees. Response: Noted Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016. On the Landscape Plan and the Hydrozone Plan, please use heavier line to depict the berms and call out the height. The Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Utility Plan Sheet 16 of 32, depicts the berms very clearly. We want to make sure that for construction plans, bid documents and for contractors, the design is clear and unambiguous. Response A heavier line weight has been used and berm heights have been added to these plans. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016 03/30/2016: The trash enclosure is specified to be 7'6" in height which seems a bit high. Perhaps this can be lowered to six feet so it is not as imposing with no loss of screening capability. Response -Addressed Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/30/2016