The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCROWNE ON TIMBERLINE - PDP - PDP130009 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)equipment is scn. ,ed. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/23/2013 05/23/2013: Sidewalks that are at the head of parking stalls and act has an overhang area are required to be 6ft in width. There are three sidewalks areas where it is unclear if it is meeting this standard south of building 6, east of building 1 and south of the west half of building 2. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/23/2013 05/23/2013: The landscaping plan needs table showing tree species and quantities. Also along Timberline there is a label (4) QUMA this label is incorrect. The landscape plan needs more details the areas label shrub -beds, it is unclear if these areas will comply. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/23/2013 05/23/2013: Does the Mail area have a structure? If so please included elevations of it. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/24/2013 05/24/2013: What is in the Dryland seed mix? This should be noted on the landscape plan. and/or movemer., at an intersection must be mitigated. The indicates the southbound movement fails LOS in the short term background and total conditions. The project has the responsibility to mitigate the failure and per Table 4-3, also has the responsibility to provide a transportation improvement due to the overall LOS of E at the intersection. Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Emma McArdle, 970-224-6197, emcardle@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 04/16/2013: According to LUC section 3.6.5, new development shall "adequately accommodate existing and planned transit service by integrating facilities designed and located appropriately for transit into the development plan." Transfort's long range plans have a route adjacent to this site on Timberline Road. To accommodate this future service, please provide a 20' wide by 12' deep concrete pad adjacent to the curb and sidewalk in the vicinity of the 4 car garage and trash near the southeast corner of your site. The concrete pad needs to be either in the ROW or within a transit easement. This will be a bus stop at the time service begins in this area, Transfort will provide signage and a bus shelter and/or benches for the use of the transit patrons at that time. Please contact me with any questions. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 04/10/2013: Water and wastewater services in this area are provided by the Fort Collins -Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation District. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 05/23/2013: The 2ft walls are not sufficient to screen the recycling bins. 04/09/2013: LUC 3.2.5 The trash and recycling enclosures. The enclosures do not appear to be designed with a walk-in access, this will need to be revised. Also the plan only shows two enclosures for the entire site this is not adequate for the trash and recycling needs of the development. Label the dimensions of the enclosures on the site plan. If the enclosures are kept at 6ft and under they will not require a building permit. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 05/23/2013: The below comment still applies and has not been addressed with the resubmital. 04/09/2013: LUC 3.5.1(1) Mechanical/utility equipment (vents, flues, rtu/ac units, meters, boxes, transformers, conduit...) locations need to be identified on the plans with notes on how such previous commei. _nd indicate OMB's at the Red Wing termin,...jn unless there is a grade change beyond the termination. If so, then the Type III's are to remain. 04/09/2013: Sht 4: Please replace the OM4-2 object marker with a Type III barricade at the north termination of Red Willow Drive. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 04/09/2013: Sht 4: Please replace the OM4-2 object marker with a Type III barricade at the north termination of the curb ramp area on the north side of Rosen at Timberline. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 05/29/2013: Continue comment. Type III is appropriate here with the lowest board 1 or two inches above grade for sight impaired peds to detect the barricade. 04/09/2013: Sht 4: Replace the OM4-2 object marker with a Type III barricade at the south termination of the sidewalk on Timberline at the south end of the developments property. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: Mostly revised. Please add the second right turn pavement marking on the SbR turn lane at Rosen. 04/10/2013: Sht 4: Please remove the Right Turn Lane Must Turn Right signage. Use 2 arrows on the pavement. No "ONLY" stencil. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/30/2013 05/30/2013: Please break out the signing and striping information to a separate plan or make it stand out much more on the current plan. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 05/29/2013: Traffic Op's didn't receive sheet 6 which according to the sheet index contains the Landscaping notes. This comment is continued. 04/09/2013: Sht 6/6; Sight Distance Easement Notes: Please revise the height language in note #2 to be 8' (LCUASS 7.4.1.6). Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 05/29/2013: Traffic Op's didn't receive sheet 6 which according to the sheet index contains the Landscaping notes. This comment is continued. 04/09/2013: Sht 6/6; Planting Notes: Please add a note that states " Street trees shall not be planted in such a manner that effectively blocks visibility of traffic regulatory signage. If conflict arises landscape arch itect/contractor shall contact the City Traffic Engineer (970-221-6630) to determine if the affected regulatory signage can be moved (at the development's expense) and if so, the relocated position." Topic: Traffic Impact Study Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 05/29/2013: After considerable analysis the City still finds that the Sb movement at Timberline and Kechter is still failing LOS standards and must be mitigated. Current analysis indicates a SbR turn lane mitigates the condition. The Development can provide funds for the improvements in -lieu of constructing them. 04/10/2013: (revised comment) The TIS states the Nb and Sb right turn lanes at Timberline and Kechter are warranted in the existing conditions. For clarification they are warranted per LCUASS Fig 8-5, but are not existing condition LOS failures in the City model (with the TIS volumes) as they can be mitigated with timing changes. The Existing TIS conditions/volumes do not fail using the HCS analysis either. Per LCUASS Table 4-3, LOS failures of approaches 05/29/2013: PIE; .,e correct the spelling of "private" in the Pri�_..a Irrigation Easement Acceptance. See redlines. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please state for all tracts, the proposed use and who owns & maintains them. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please provide a description of the Center 1/4 Corner on sheet 2. See redlines. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: All off -site easements will need to be shown with recording information. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please show the areas excluded from utility, drainage & access easements. Please clarify the intent of the Plat with regards to the extents of the utility, drainage and access easement. Is the area shown as "emergency access, access, and utility easement" also intended to be drainage easement? Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: As an alternative to labeling the Poudre Valley REA easement, you could vacate it. This would require a signature from Pudre Valley REA. Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please change the linetype of the ties, to distinguish them from the building envelopes and easements. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/27/2013: The spelling is still incorrect on sheet 3. 04/10/2013: Please correct the spelling of Crowne in the title on sheets 1 & 3. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/27/2013: The legal description still does not match the Subdivision Plat. 04/10/2013: The legal description does not match the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/27/2013: This has been addressed, but sheet 6 was not part of the plan set. If sheet 6 is no longer needed, please remove it from the sheet index and change the sheet numbering. 04/10/2013: The index on sheet 1 does not match the titles on each sheet. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/27/2013: There are still issues on sheets 2 & 3. 04/10/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 2, 3 & 4. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/27/2013: There are still issues on sheet 3. 04/10/2013: There are text over text issues on sheet 3. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 05/29/2013: John, Our off line discussions determined that we are now allowing the OMB's at roadway terminations and my previous comment is now incorrect. Please disregard my method. Also, �- , of the parking area will need to be pervio,_ ,pavement. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/27/2013: These issues have not been corrected, and there is now a new issue on sheet A-12. 04/10/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet A-2, A-4, A-5, A-7, A-8, A-9, A-10 & A-11. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/27/2013: There are still line over text issues on sheets C-004, C-008, C-009, C-011, C-012, C-014, C-015 & C-016. 04/10/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet C-004, C-006, C-008, C-009, C-014 & C-015. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/27/2013: This has been addressed. 04/10/2013: Please correct the titles on sheets PMA & PM.2. These are titled Site Plans, but they are Photometric Plans. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/27/2013 05/27/2013: The text is still hard to read in the lighting fixture specifications. This text will not scan or reproduce well. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 04/10/2013: The boundary and legal description close. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: Please add a Lienholder signature block as a placeholder, unless/until you can definitively state there is no lienholders. 04/10/2013: Are there any lienholders? If so, please add the Lienholders signature block. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: There is still some missing information. See redlines. 04/10/2013: There are many bearings & distances and widths missing from the easements shown. All easements(existing & proposed) must be locatable. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: There are still some missing ties. See redlines. 04/10/2013: Please add the missing ties as marked on sheet 2. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: These were not provided. 04/10/2013: Please provide current monument records for the section comers shown on this Plat. These can be emailed directly to us at jcounty@fcgov.com. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 2. Fire -sprinkles . _quired for all new multi -family buildings. 3. Bedroom egress windows required below 4th floor regardless of fire -sprinkler. 4. IBC chapter 11 and State statute CRS 9-5 requires project provide accessible units per that code. 5. New Green Code requires: a. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling. b. Low -flow Watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are required. c. Special combustion safety requirements for natural draft gas appliances. d. Low VOC interior finishes. City of Fort Collins Building Services Plan Review 416-2341 Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, Iynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 03 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: TURNING RADII Some of the turns are very sharp. Please verify that fire apparatus can make the turns within the development. The required turning radii of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside. 2006 International Fire Code 503.2.4 and Local Amendments. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, Ischlam@fcqov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 04/09/2013: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria Under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/28/2013: Layout is OK for preliminary. Landscaping will be reviewed during final compliance. 04/10/2013: The detention ponds need to meet the City's Detention Pond Landscape Standards. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/28/2013: A meeting is needed to coordinate expectations for final review. 04/10/2013: This site will need to provide for 50% of the land area to be treated by a LID I'd like to see a G , y of the site plan at some point as well. I don't know if the plan narrative from Vignette was partially complete, but the Anticipated Development Schedule and Proposed Street Names referenced in the Table of Contents were Omitted. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/27/2013 05/23/2013: Building Department: I wanted to strongly suggest the applicant for Crown at Timberline talk to me about using elec heat for this project. Almost all other projects have changed course and gone to nat-gas after I give them the building code requirements (green code amendments) for elec heat. 03/27/2013: Building Department: Building Permit Pre -Submittal Meeting Pre -Submittal meetings are offered to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new commercial or multi -family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid -design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi -family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre -submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2009 International Building Code (IBC) 2009 International Residential Code (IRC) 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2009 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2009 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2011 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2009 IRC Chapter 11 or 2009 IECC Chap 4. 2. Multi -family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2009 IECC Chapter 4. 3. Commercial and Multi -family 4 stories and taller: 2009 IECC Chapter 5. Fort Collins Green Code Amendments effective starting 1-1-2012. A copy of these, requirements can be obtained at the Building Office or contact the above phone number. Crown on Timberline � project specific concerns: 1. Townhomes are proposed and per code a townhome has property lines between each unit and is single family attached. Add additional in,_ .,cation to planting note #6 that includes all ie separations in LUC 3.2.1 K 1-6. Add to planting note #10 that species changes need to be approved by the City Forester. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 04/10/2013: If at all possible provide street light locations on the landscape plan and place street trees that are to the spacing standard in LUC 3.2.1 K 1. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 04/10/2013: Tree species changes: Red Sunsett Maple (Acer rubrum) does not survive in Fort collins soils. The City Forestry Divisions suggests Accolade Elm or American Sentry Linden as two possible substitutions. Hedge Maple is similar to Big Tooth Maple which does better in the Fort Collins Climate. Please Specify Kentucky Coffee trees as the cultivar Expresso. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: The on -site meeting to evaluate existing trees has not been completed. Please contact the City Forester to schedule the meeting. Contact the City Forester and Environmental Planner for an on- site meeting to evaluate existing trees. Plan will need to identify existing significant trees as to species, condition, location, save or remove and mitigation. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: These are a couple of comments from the previous round that we would appreciate getting an update on. Will more detail be provided on the shrub bed design? If at all possible provide street light locations on the landscape plan and place street trees that are to the spacing standard in LUC 3.2.1 K 1. Department: Internal Services Contact: Seth Lorson, 970-224-61899 slorson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/27/2013 03/27/2013: GIS: 1. This project requires the Unit Level Addressing form be submitted to the GIS Department once plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. This can occur anytime during construction, but before any utilities are set within the structure to ensure the meter banks match the official addressing for the structure. The Unit Level Addressing form can be obtained by contacting the GIS office at gis@fcgov.com or (970) 416-2483. Addressing will be determined by the GIS Department. 05/29/2013: PI&.-- ensure that all driveway approaches for alp „le private drives in the development intersecting public streets are labelled and depicted in concrete. The construction, landscape, and site plans depict concrete only for the Corona Drive private drive/Prairie Hill Drive intersection, when concrete is also required for the two driveways out to Rosen Drive and the unnamed driveway out Red Willow Drive. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: I'm understanding that the level of service questions raised with the project by Traffic Operations can be mitigated with the construction of a southbound right turn lane at Kechter Road and Willow Springs Way. The developer would need to have this improvement designed and constructed with the project. Alternatively, the developer would have the option to provide funds for the construction of the right turn lane to the City and the right turn lane would be a capital project (that would look to coincide with the northbound right turn lane capital project). Determination of whether the project would build or provide funds for this improvement should be made prior to a hearing for the project. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 04/03/2013: No comments. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, Topic: Comment Number: 8 05/29/2013: tuchanan@fcgov.com Comment Originated: 04/03/2013 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 They symbol GTLR is used to label 5 street trees along Rosen Drive but in the Plant list GYLI lis listed. Please check. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 04/10/2013: Contact the City Forester and Environmental Planner for an on- site meeting to evaluate existing trees. Plan will need to identify existing significant trees as to species, condition, location, save or remove and mitigation. Comment Number: 2 04/10/2013: Will more detail be provided on the shrub bed design? Comment Number: 3 04/10/2013: Planting Notes: Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 Please expand Planting note #2 to say that trees in dry land seed area to be irrigated with an automatic drip/bubbler irrigation system. right-of-way. The r.,,cement of manholes in the sidewalk for in. .,ice, will not be allowed. In addition, the crossing of the right-of-way for the irrigation line will need to be at right angles (perpendicular) to the right-of-way and cannot be skewed across the right-of-way as it occurs on the updated drawing. The requirement is to eliminate the placement of private lines in right-of-way, with the potential exception of private line(s) crossing the right-of-way at 90 degree angles and then authorized under an encroachment permit. Further review and comment may result with subsequent designs. The plat will need to reflect all right-of-way being dedicated as being free from irrigation easement encumberances. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: An additional 50 (approximate) feet of sidewalk to the west would need to be installed in order to cover the entire frontage of Tract B and should be installed with the project. 04/10/2013: If the revised design of the irrigation line results in the eastern portion of Rosen Drive not having full right-of-way dedicated to the northern property line boundary in order to place irrigation facilities on the north side of Rosen Drive, outside of right-of-way, the project will need to construct sidewalk along that northern portion of Rosen Drive along with landscaping and trees in the parkway strip. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: With the widening of Timberline Road, the manhole structure shown to be lowered to finished grade needs to be moved out of the right-of-way in its entirety, limiting the private improvements in right-of-way to the extension of the pipe crossing. The grading of the area behind the curb and gutter appears to be 4:1, in compliance with right-of-way grading requirements, however with the future extension of sidewalk abutting the property to the north, will placement of the sidewalk at 1/4 inch per foot be possible with the grades and structure behind the right-of-way? A cross-section of Timberline Road should be provided along this area to see how sidewalk can be installed in the future with the grading and irrigation structure in close proximity. 04/10/2013: The connection of Rosen Drive out to Timberline Road will need to have additional widening to Timberline Road north of Rosen Drive to achieve widening out of the roadway to the curb return heading north. The City Traffic Engineer and City Engineer were both concerned about the apparent proposal to limit widening of Timberline road to the northern property line. The vegetation north of the access along Timberline Road creates a sight visibility concern that needs to be removed in tandem with the road widening as well as possible grading work to give safer sight visibility for vehicles exiting Rosen Drive onto Timberline Road. Offsite work on the property to the north (in future right-of-way) will be needed as a result. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: Carried over for reference. 04/10/2013: Language will look to be added in the development agreement for the project indicating that the ultimate buildout of Timberline Road with medians would likely result in the restriction of Rosen Drive's intersection with Timberline Road being limited to a 3/4 movement in the future and no expectation for Rosen Drive at Timberline Road to be a full movement intersection. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: The plans (especially the landscape plan) need to show what occurs for landscaping with the removal of the White Willow Drive stub from Linden Park to this property. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 Comment Numt,vf: 1 comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Each site entrance (automobile) bleeds light beyond the 20' max and exceeds the 0.1 max foot-candle. Any light levels measured beyond 20 feet from the property line may not exceed 0.1 foot-candle per LUC Sec. 3.2.4(D)(8). Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: Please depict the widening on the plans to ensure that the walk is not poured to take into account the widening prior to the installation of the sidewalk chase. 04/10/2013: The sidewalk chase use in right-of-way requires the sidewalk transitioning to be 1 foot wider on either side with the length of the crossing then widened to 2 feet overall. A detail for use in public right-of-way will be provided. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: The response indicated that this comment was provided for, where achievable. Sheets 13-16 do not have the plan and profile views aligned. Not sure why this cannot be achieved, perhaps the scale on the drawings need to be modified or the information for each sheet needs to be split into two or more sheets in order to address this. 04/10/2013: On the plan and profile sheets, please have the plan view graphically aligned with the profile view in order to following the vertical alignment better. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 04/11/2013 05/29/2013: The plans indicate the construction of a two foot shoulder. The City has adopted the use of a 4 foot paved shoulder with a 2 foot gravel shoulder and should be provided instead of the 2 foot shoulder. 04/11/2013: Is the sawcut line for the construction of new pavement such that there's additional pavement to sawcut out a clean edge in which to widen Timberline Road? If there isn't, additional sawcut of existing pavement may be needed and would need to encompass the entire existing bikelane width as no seams would be allowed in the bikelane. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: Carried over as unresolved at this time. 04/10/2013: Based on information shown on the grading plan, a letter of intent it needed for the offsite work occurring on HCT LLC property. Depending on additional design information along Timberline Road north of the property, the letter of intent may also be needed to address design of the right turn lane into the site and sight visibility to the north. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/10/2013 05/29/2013: With the widening of Timberline Road, the manhole structure shown to be lowered to finished grade needs to be moved out of the right-of-way in its entirety, limiting the private improvements in right-of-way to the extension of the pipe crossing. Sleeving will be required for the crossings of the public streets internal to the site. 04/10/2013: The design of the irrigation line as originally submitted with the formal review is problematic in that it can't be in right-of-way. With subsequent revisions, the running of the irrigation line behind the sidewalk outside of right-of-way, needs to be fully outside of Fort Collins � _ Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview May 31, 2013 Terence Hoaglund Vignette Studios PO Box1889 Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Crowne on Timberline, PDP130009, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Seth Lorson, at 970-224-6189 or slorson@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Seth Lorson, 970-224-6189, slorson@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 04/09/2013: The development is required to provide variation among repeating buildings, at least three distinctly different designs. As proposed all the three story buildings are made up of different combinations of the same building features. Please provide one more distinct building design per 3.8.30(F)(2). This standard specifically excludes clubhouses and leasing offices. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/09/2013 05/28/2013: Color plans are needed for development review and must be submitted prior to scheduling public hearing. 04/09/2013: Please provide color elevations or color perspectives to show compliance with the requirement to provide variation in color schemes per 3.8.30(F)(3) & (7). Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/31/2013: This project is on trajectory to be scheduled for the July 18th Planning and Zoning Board hearing. The few outstanding items will be sorted out informally prior to scheduling the hearing. Topic: Lighting Plan