The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSCOTT PLAZA - PDP - PDP130032 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYBicycle LOS Worksheet L'eirel of•SeMoe Caniechv4Y' , - -' R' Base Connectivity: C g B Specific connections to priority sites: '�,'AreaWdMtl°f320' rY ,vClassfica6on,,, iu Colorado State University to the east Institutional B B B Campsouth us West to the 2 Commercial g g B 3 4 37 N 3 w, Laurel Street Q 'Y^ V/ L V/ U) U (D U) m Q Plum Street Y Y 0 Elizabeth St et Cott Plaza SCALE: 1 "=500' Bicycle Influence Area --//i—DELICH -71 rASSOCIATES 36 Pedestrian LOS Worksheet Project Location Classification: Commercial Corridor :_DesCnphon of Appf�ble i)eshnabon Aea w�n,m �o Deshna6on : area `Clas�icxborr Levei oEB {mmuraan based an pn�ecE bca6on"c6assi5gUoir) ° r v ,at - :,, sir Colorado State University to the east Institutional Minimum B B C B g 1 Actual A B B B g Proposed A B g g g Commercial to the south Commercial Minimum B B C B g 2 Actual A B B B g Proposed A B B g g Residential to the west Residential Minimum B B C B B 3 Actual A B A B B Proposed A B A B g Residential to the north Residential Minimum B B C g g 4 Actual A B A B g A B A B B 5 4Actual 6 Proposed Minimum 7 Actual Proposed Minimum 8 Actual Proposed Minimum 9 Actual Proposed Minimum 10 Actual Proposed 35 N Laurel Street Q (WD m U m Plum Street 0 3 � . -U 1 Elizabeth St et Cott Plaza SCALE: 1 "=500' Pedestrian Influence Area --/I f-DELICH -71 rASSOCIATES 34 APPENDIX F 33 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Scott/Blue Bell & Plum Short Background PM Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 2.4 t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 3 181 5 49 200 20 4 0 29 33 1 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop ' RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ' Mvmt Flow 3 201 6 54 222 22 4 0 32 37 1 1 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 ' Conflicting Flow All 244 0 0 207 0 0 554 564 204 569 555 233 Stage 1 211 211 342 342 Stage 2 - - - - - - 343 353 - 227 213 - Follow-up Headway 2.218 _ - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 ' Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 1322 1364 _ 443 435 837 433 440 806 Stage 1 - - - - - - 791 728 - 673 638 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 672 631 - 776 726 - ' Time blocked -Platoon, % - - Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 1322 _ _ 1364 425 414 837 401 419 806 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 425 414 - 401 419 - Stage 1 789 726 - 671 609 ' Stage 2 - - 639 602 744 724 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.4 10.1 14.8 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 749 1322 - 1364 - 407 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 0.003 - 0.04 - 0.096 ' HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 7.73 0 _ 7.749 0 _ 14.8 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.154 0.008 - 0.125 - 0.315 ' Notes Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error: Computation Not Defined 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Synchro 8 Light Report ' Page 1 32 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Scott/Blue Bell & Plum ' Short Total AM Intersection ' Intersection Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 3 196 1 11 67 1 2 0 43 6 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop ' RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 0 ' Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ' Mvmt Flow 4 231 1 13 79 1 2 0 51 7 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 ' Conflicting Flow All 80 0 0 232 0 0 343 344 231 369 344 79 Stage 1 238 238 105 105 Stage 2 - - - - - - 105 106 - 264 239 - Follow-up Headway 2.218 - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 ' Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 1518 _ 1336 611 579 808 588 579 981 Stage 1 - - - - - 765 708 - 901 808 - Stage 2 - - - - - 901 807 - 741 708 - ' Time blocked -Platoon, % - Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 1518 1336 605 571 808 546 571 981 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver - - - - 605 571 - 546 571 - Stage 1 763 706 - 898 800 ' Stage 2 _ _ _ 892 799 693 706 _ Approach EB WB NB SB ' HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.1 9.8 11.7 HCM LOS A B ' Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL.nl Capacity (veh/h) 796 1518 - 1336 - 546 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 0.002 - 0.01 - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 7.377 0 _ 7.721 0 11.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A B HCM 95th %file Q(veh) 0.213 0.007 - 0.029 - 0.039 ' Notes Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error: Computation Not Defined 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 8:00 am 3/6/2008 Final Timings - 2009 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 1 31 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) Short Background PM Phase Number 2 4 6 8 Movement SBTL EBTL NBTL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None Maximum Split (s) 87 33 87 33 Maximum Split (%) 72.5% 27.5% 72.5% 27.5% Minimum Split (s) 23.5 31 24 31 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3 3.5 3 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 Minimum Initial (s) 10 7 10 7 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 10 14 12 15 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 91 58 91 58 End Time (s) 58 91 58 91 Yield/Force Off (s) 53 85.5 53 85.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 43 71.5 41 70.5 Local Start Time (s) 33 0 33 0 Local Yield (s) 115 27.5 115 27.5 Local Yield 170(s) 105 13.5 103 12.5 Intersection Summa Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated -Coordinated Natural Cycle 120 Offset: 58 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red Splits and Phases: 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) 1- "U4 02 87s 33s •- - 06 08 87s I 033s I' City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 7 30 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) Short Background PM Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 91 + 73 78 67 4 61 ? 13 Vi 106 tt+ 1070 87 13 +T* 1490 123 ' Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 0.93 0.92 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 ' Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/ln 171.0 174.4 171.0 171.0 167.6 167.6 167.6 167.6 171.0 167.6 167.6 171.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 ' Cap,vehm 146 102 81 150 119 308 151 2181 169 270 2177 171 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Sat Flow,vehm 475 471 373 476 552 1425 242 3067 237 392 3060 240 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 251 0 0 141 0 0 116 642 625 14 888 879 ' Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hM 1319 0 0 1028 0 1425 242 1676 1627 392 1676 1624 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.3 20.9 21.0 2.0 38.0 39.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.6 0.0 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0 83.0 20.9 21.0 23.0 38.0 39.7 Prop In Lane 0.40 0.28 0.52 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 328 0 0 269 0 308 151 1193 1158 270 1193 1155 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.74 0.76 i Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 367 0 0 306 0 348 151 1193 1158 270 1193 1155 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.83 0.83 0.83 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.3 0.0 0.0 41.1 0.0 0.0 41.6 7.9 7.9 13.3 10.3 10.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 24.2 1.3 1.4 0.3 3.5 4.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/wile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 8.1 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 8.1 7.9 0.2 15.2 15.4 ' Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 52.7 0.0 0.0 42.7 0.0 0.0 65.8 9.2 9.3 13.6 13.9 14.6 Lane Grp LOS D D E A A B B B Approach Vol, veh1h 251 141 1383 1781 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.7 42.7 14.0 14.2 ' Approach LOS D D B B Timer ' Assigned Phs 4 8 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.7 29.7 87.0 87.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.5 27.5 82.0 82.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll ), s 23.6 16.8 85.0 41.7 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.5 1.0 0.0 22.2 Intersection Summary ' HCM 2010 Ctd Delay 18.0 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Synchro 8 Light Report ' Page 5 29 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) Short Total AM j t �-- Phase Number 2 4 6 8 Movement SBTL EBTL NBTL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None Maximum Split (s) 75 35 75 35 Maximum Split (%) 68.2% 31.8% 68.2% 31.8% Minimum Split (s) 23.5 31 24 31 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3 3.5 3 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 Minimum Initial (s) 10 7 10 7 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 10 14 12 15 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Inhibit Max - Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 39 4 39 4 End Time (s) 4 39 4 39 Yield/Force Off (s) 109 33.5 109 33.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 99 19.5 97 18.5 Local Start Time (s) 35 0 35 0 Local Yield (s) 105 29.5 105 29.5 Local Yield 170(s) 95 15.5 93 14.5 Intersection Summa Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated -Coordinated Natural Cycle 70 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red ano rnases: 4a: ameias 6 rwmiNorm ur City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 8:00 am 3l6/2008 Final Timings - 2009 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 7 28 ' HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) Short Total AM ' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' Volume (veh/h) 97 4, 80 71 17 .T 16 r 5 ►) 31 +T* 1023 65 I 17 +T* 669 33 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 _ 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.90 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97 1,00 0.97 ' Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/hM 171.0 174.4 171.0 171.0 167.6 167.6 167.6 167.6 171.0 167.6 167.6 171.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 ' Cap,veh/h 183 127 90 168 141 347 436 2110 128 295 2147 98 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 553 521 368 475 579 1425 544 3124 190 336 3178 144 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 313 0 0 43 0 0 41 721 707 22 464 456 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehm4n 1442 0 0 1054 0 1425 544 1676 1637 336 1676 1646 Q Serve(g_s), s 19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 22.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Prop In Lane 0.41 0.26 0.51 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.09 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 400 0 0 309 0 347 436 1132 1105 295 1132 1112 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.64 0.64 0.07 0.41 0.41 ' Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 466 0 0 368 0 413 436 1132 1105 295 1132 1112 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.2 0.0 0.0 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.2 2.3 0.5 1.1 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q (50%), vehM 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.3 0.3 ' Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 45.6 0.0 0.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.2 2.3 0.5 1.1 1.1 Lane Grp LOS D C A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 313 43 1469 942 Approach Delay, s/veh 45.6 31.1 2.2 1.1 ' Approach LOS D C A A Timer ' Assigned Phs 4 8 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.1 30.1 75.0 75.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 29.5 70.0 70.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 24.0 4.2 2.0 2.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.6 1.3 14.6 14.6 Intersection Summary t HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.2 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 8:00 am 3/6/2008 Final Timings - 2009 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 5 27 APPENDIX E 3.] HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Scott/Blue Bell & Plum Short Background PM Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 3 181 2 1 200 20 3 0 3 33 1 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 201 2 1 222 22 3 0 3 37 1 1 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 244 0 0 203 0 0 446 456 202 447 446 233 Stage 1 209 209 236 236 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 237 247 - 211 210 - Follow-up Headway 2.218 _ 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 ' Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 1322 _ 1369 523 501 839 522 507 806 Stage 1 - - - - - - 793 729 - 767 710 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 766 702 - 791 728 ' Time blocked -Platoon, % - _ _ Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 1322 _ 1369 520 499 839 518 505 806 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 520 499 - 518 505 - Stage 1 791 727 - 765 709 ' Stage 2 - - 763 701 785 726 ' Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 10.7 12.4 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 642 1322 - 1369 - 523 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 0.003 - 0.001 - 0.074 t HCM Control Delay (s) 10.7 7.73 0 _ 7.632 0 _ 12.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.031 0.008 - 0.002 - 0.24 ' Notes Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error: Computation Not Defined 1 ' City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 1 ' 25 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Scott/Blue Bell & Plum Short Background AM Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 3 196 0 1 67 1 0 0 1 6 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 231 0 1 79 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 80 0 0 231 0 0 320 320 231 320 320 79 Stage 1 - - - - - - 238 238 - 82 82 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 82 82 - 238 238 - Follow-up Headway 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 1518 - - 1337 - - 633 597 808 633 597 981 Stage 1 - - - - - - 765 708 - 926 827 - Stage 2 - - - - 926 827 - 765 708 - Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 1518 1337 - 631 595 808 630 595 981 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver - - - 631 595 - 630 595 - Stage 1 - 763 706 - 923 826 Stage 2 - 925 826 - 762 706 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 9.5 10.8 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 808 1518 - 1337 - 630 .HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.002 - - 0.001 - - 0.011 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 7.377 0 - 7.695 0 - 10.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A B HCM 95th %file Q(veh) 0.004 0.007 - 0.003 - 0.034 Notes Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error: Computation Not Defined City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 8:00 am 3/6/2008 Final Timings - 2009 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 1 24 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) Short Background PM Phase Number 1 2 --• 4 t 6 '— 8 Movement SBTL EBTL NBTL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None Maximum Split (s) 88 32 88 32 Maximum Split (%) 73.3% 26.7% 73.3% 26.7% Minimum Split (s) 23.5 31 24 31 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3 3.5 3 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 Minimum Initial (s) 10 7 10 7 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 10 14 12 15 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 90 58 90 58 End Time (s) 58 90 58 90 Yield/Force Off (s) 53 84.5 53 84.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 43 70.5 41 69.5 Local Start Time (s) 32 0 32 0 Local Yield (s) 115 26.5 115 26.5 Local Yield 170(s) 105 12.5 103 11.5 Intersection Summa Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated -Coordinated Natural Cycle 120 Offset: 58 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red and Phases: 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr /b SL s ' City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 7 23 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) Short Background PM Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + 4T r v) tT+ +T► ' Volume (veh/h) 82 66 70 67 48 13 91 1070 87 13 1490 103 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 0.93 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 ' Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/In 171.0 174.4 171.0 171.0 167.6 167.6 167.6 167.6 171.0 167.6 167.6 171.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 ' Cap, veh/h 137 96 73 150 93 276 168 2245 173 284 2272 150 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow, veh/h 482 495 378 517 478 1425 247 3067 237 392 3103 205 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 226 0 0 127 0 0 100 642 625 14 877 869 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1355 0 0 996 0 1425 247 1676 1627 392 1676 1631 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.7 19.1 19.2 1.8 33.8 35.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.6 0.0 0.0 14.1 0.0 0.0 79.7 19.1 19.2 21.0 33.8 35.0 ' Prop In Lane 0.40 0.28 0.58 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h _ 306 0 0 243 0 276 168 1227 1191 284 1227 1194 V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.52 0.52 0.05 0.71 0.73 ' Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 369 0 0 301 0 342 168 1227 1191 284 1227 1194 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.83 0.83 0.83 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.6 0.0 0.0 42.5 0.0 0.0 31.6 6.7 6.7 11.3 8.6 8.8 ' Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 11.3 1.2 1.3 0.3 3.0 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 7.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 7.2 7.0 0.2 13.2 13.4 Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 50.8 0.0 0.0 44.2 0.0 0.0 43.0 7.9 8.0 11.5 11.6 12.0 Lane Grp LOS D D D A A B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 226 127 1367 1760 ' Approach Delay, s/veh 50.8 44.2 10.5 11.8 Approach LOS D D B B Timer ' Assigned Phs 4 8 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.7 26.7 88.0 88.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 26.5 83.0 83.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll ), s 20.6 16.1 81.7 37.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.7 0.9 1.2 23.1 1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.0 HCM 2010 LOS B ' Notes 1 ' City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 5 ' 22 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) ' Short Background AM Phase Number 2 4 6 8 Movement SBTL EBTL NBTL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None Maximum Split (s) 75 35 75 35 Maximum Split (%) 68.2% 31.8% 68.2% 31.8% Minimum Split (s) 23.5 31 24 31 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3 3.5 3 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 Minimum Initial (s) 10 7 10 7 ' Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 10 14 12 15 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes ' Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 39 4 39 4 End Time (s) 4 39 4 39 ' Yield/Force Off (s) 109 33.5 109 33.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 99 19.5 97 18.5 Local Start Time (s) 35 0 35 0 Local Yield (s) 105 29.5 105 29.5 Local Yield 170(s) 95 15.5 93 14.5 Intersection Summa Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated -Coordinated Natural Cycle 70 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red Splits and Phases: 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) 1 -*04 02 75s 35s t06 ~ 8 75 s 35 s City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 8:00 am 3/6/2008 Final Timings - 2009 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 7 21 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) Short Background AM -A � 'r ♦- 4�' .4\ t 1A0. ti 1 r Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + +T r t) tf� I Tll� ' Volume (veh/h) 79 69 58 17 13 5 28 1023 65 17 669 29 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 0.98 0.89 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/In 171.0 174.4 171.0 171.0 167.6 167.6 167.6 167.6 171.0 167.6 167.6 171.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 ' Cap, veh/h 163 120 74 166 111 303 455 2197 133 308 2247 92 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 530 566 349 518 521 1425 546 3124 190 336 3195 131 ' Grp Volume(v), veh/h 257 0 0 39 0 0 37 721 .707 22 462 454 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1446 0 0 1039 0 1425 546 1676 1637 336 1676 1649 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.1 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Prop In Lane 0.40 0.24 0.56 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.08 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 357 0 0 277 0 303 455 1179 1151 308 1179 1160 V/C Ratio(X) 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.61 0.61 0.07 0.39 0.39 ' Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 485 0 0 391 0 431 455 1179 1151 308 1179 1160 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.97 0.97 0.97 ' Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.9 0.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.9 2.0 0.4 0.9 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q (50%), vehM 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.3 ' Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 41.2 0.0 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.9 2.0 0.4 0.9 1.0 Lane Grp LOS D C A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 257 39 1465 938 ' Approach Delay, s/veh 41.2 32.3 19 0.9 Approach LOS D C A A Timer Assigned Phs 4 8 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.9 25.9 75.0 75.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 ' Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 29.5 70.0 70.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll ), s 19.1 4.2 2.0 2.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.8 1.0 14.5 14.5 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 C►rl Delay 5.8 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 8:00 am 3/6/2008 Final Timings - 2009 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 5 20 APPENDIX D 19 Table 4-3 Fort Collins (City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) , LandUse `(from structure `plan) = x Othercorridors vWhm density P. Intersection e h!P Commercial Mixed:use `maedLuse All other,' corridors.,K distracts ..>,, ;residential ;areas ' Signalized intersections D E* D D (overall) Any Leg E E D E Any Movement E E D E Stop sign control N/A F** F** E (arterial/collector or local — any approach leg) Stop sign control N/A C C C (collector/local--any approach leg) * mitigating measures required ** considered normal in an urban environment 18 ' UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A <10 B >10and<15 C > 15 and < 25 D > 25 and < 35 E > 35 and < 50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A <10 B > 10 and < 20 C > 20 and < 35 D > 35 and < 55 E > 55 and < 80 F > 80 17 ' HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Scott/Blue Bell &Plum ' recent PM Intersection ' Intersection Delay, s/veh 1.3 ' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 3 144 2 1 142 19 3 0 3 31 1 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 = 0 0 0 - ' Grade, % 0 = 0 = = 0 = 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ' Mvmt Flow 3 160 2 1 158 21 3 0 3 34 1 1 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 ' Conflicting Flow All 179 0 0 162 0 0 340 349 161 340 340 168 Stage 1 168 168 - 171 171 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 172 181 - 169 169 - Follow-up Headway 2.218 _ - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 ' Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 1397 1417 _ 614 575 884 614 582 876 Stage 1 - - - - - - 834 759 - 831 757 - Stage 2 - - 830 750 - 833 759 - ' Time blocked -Platoon, _ _ _ _ Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 1397 - 1417 - - 611 573 884 610 580 876 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver - - - - - 611 573 - 610 580 - ' Stage 1 832 757 - 829 756 Stage 2 - - 827 749 828 757 = ' Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 10 11.2 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBLnl EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 723 1397 - 1417 - 615 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.002 - 0.001 - 0.06 ' HCM Control Delay (s) 10 7.583 0 _ 7.543 0 _ 11.2 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.028 0.007 - 0.002 - 0.19 Notes Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error: Computation Not Defined ' City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 1 ' 16 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: ScotUBlue Bell & Plum Recent AM Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 3 137 0 1 52 1 0 0 1 6 0 0 Conflicting Peds, f#hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 161 0 1 61 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minort Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 62 0 0 161 0 0 232 233 161 233 232 62 Stage 1 - - - - - - 168 168 - 64 64 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 64 65 - 169 168 - Follow-up Headway 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 1541 - - 1418 - - 723 667 884 722 668 1003 Stage 1 - - - - - - 834 759 - 947 842 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 947 841 - 833 759 - Time blocked -Platoon, % - - _ _ Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 1541 - - 1418 - - 721 664 884 719 665 1003 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 721 664 - 719 665 - Stage 1 - - 831 757 - 944 841 Stage 2 - - 946 840 - 829 757 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 9.1 10.1 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBLnl EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 884 1541 - 1418 - 719 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.001 0.002 - - 0.001 - - 0.01 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 7.342 0 - 7.541 0 - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.004 0.007 - 0.002 - 0.03 Notes Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error: Computation Not Defined City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 8:00 am 3/6/2008 Final Timings - 2009 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 1 15 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) recent PM t •-- Phase Number 2 4 6 8 Movement SBTL EBTL NBTL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None Maximum Split (s) 88 32 88 32 Maximum Split (%) 73.3% 26.7% 73.3% 26.7% Minimum Split (s) 23.5 31 24 31 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3 3.5 3 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 Minimum Initial (s) 10 7 10 7 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 10 14 12 15 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 90 58 90 58 End Time (s) 58 90 58 90 Yield/Force Off (s) 53 84.5 53 84.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 43 70.5 41 69.5 Local Start Time (s) 32 0 32 0 Local Yield (s) 115 26.5 115 26.5 Local Yield 170(s) 105 12.5 103 11.5 Intersection Summa Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated -Coordinated Natural Cycle 90 Offset: 58 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red Splits and Phases: 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plumt 1 _ 02 �♦04 88 s 3Z s t06 08 88s Us City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 7 14 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) recent PM #'- ♦- 4- *, t r ti 1 r Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4' 41 r Vi tT* I t?* Volume (veh/h) 66 55 58 62 33 12 71 993 81 12 1383 77 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 0.92 0.91 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/In 171.0 174.4 171.0 171.0 167.6 167.6 167.6 167.6 171.0 167.6 167.6 171.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Cap, veh/h 136 105 71 173 79 272 201 2251 175 370 2312 124 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.73 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow, veh/h 482 551 373 632 416 1425 284 3065 239 427 3147 169 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 181 0 0 104 0 0 78 596 580 13 806 796 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehIhAn 1406 0 0 1048 0 1425 284 1676 1627 427 1676 1639 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 1.8 1.8 1.0 28.1 28.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.4 0.0 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 46.2 1.8 1.8 2.8 28.1 28.6 Prop In Lane 0.40 0.27 0.65 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 313 0 0 252 0 272 201 1232 1195 370 1232 1204 V/C Rafio(X) 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.48 0.48 0.04 0.65 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 381 0 0 314 0 343 201 1232 1195 370 1232 1204 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.83 0.83 0.83 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.7 0.0 0.0 41.7 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.4 0.4 4.7 7.8 7.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.3 1.0 1.1 0.1 2.3 2.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q (50%), vehAn 5.1 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.7 0.7 0.1 11.1 11.0 Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 44.4 0.0 0.0 42.8 0.0 0.0 13.2 1.4 1.5 4.8 10.0 10.2 Lane Grp LOS D D B A A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 181 104 1254 1615 Approach Delay, s/veh 44.4 42.8 2.2 10.1 Approach LOS D D A B Timer Assigned Phs 4 8 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.3 26.3 88.0 88.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 26.5 83.0 83.0 Max Q Clear Time (9_c+11), s 15.4 13.7 48.2 30.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.7 0.8 17.4 20.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 10.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 5 13 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) ' Recent AM Phase Number 2 4 6 8 ' Movement SBTL EBTL NBTL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None Maximum Split (s) 75 35 75 35 Maximum Split (%) 68.2% 31.8% 68.2% 31.8% Minimum Split (s) 23.5 31 24 31 ' Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3 3.5 3 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 Minimum Initial (s) 10 7 10 7 ' Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 1 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 10 14 12 15 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 39 4 39 4 End Time (s) 4 39 4 39 ' Yield/Force Off (s) 109 33.5 109 33.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 99 19.5 97 18.5 Local Start Time (s) 35 0 35 0 Local Yield (s) 105 29.5 105 29.5 ' Local Yield 170(s) 95 15.5 93 14.5 Intersection Summa Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated -Coordinated Natural Cycle 65 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red Splits and Phases: 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) j rd qZ ---0-04 75s I 035s 106 �i' q6 '" 08 75 s 35 s City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 8:00 am 3/6/2008 Final Timings - 2009 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 7 12 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 45: Shields & Plum/North Dr (Plum) Recent AM --v or ~ 4-- 4\ ■ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ,j, 4T ? vj tT► fl# Volume (veh/h) 55 52 40 16 9 5 23 950 60 16 621 22 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 0.98 0.88 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 ' Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/hM 171.0 174.4 171.0 171.0 167.6 167.6 167.6 167.6 171.0 167.6 167.6 171.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 ' Cap, veh/h 144 122 59 178 87 267 498 2267 138 342 2340 77 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 492 649 318 629 464 1425 584 3124 190 370 3224 107 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 179 0 0 33 0 0 30 670 656 21 425 419 ' Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hnn 1458 0 0 1092 0 1425 584 1676 1637 370 1676 1654 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' Prop In Lane 0.40 0.22 0.64 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 325 0 0 265 0 267 498 1217 1188 342 1217 1201 WC Ratio(X) 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.35 0.35 ' Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 503 0 0 422 0 444 498 1217 1188 342 1217 1201 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.6 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.5 1.5 0.3 0.8 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/wile Back of Q (50%), vehlln 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 ' Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 38.1 0.0 0.0 33.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.5 1.5 0.3 0.8 0.8 Lane Grp LOS D C A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 179 33 1356 865 Approach Delay, s/veh 38.1 33.2 1.5 0.8 ' Approach LOS D C A A Timer ' Assigned Phs 4 8 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.8 22.8 75.0 75.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 29.5 70.0 70.0 ' Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll ), s 13.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.6 0.7 12.3 12.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 4.3 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 8:00 am 3/6/2008 Final Timings - 2009 Synchro 8 Light Report Page 5 APPENDIX C 10 I 4F 7 0 PM 2-- - - 4 9 27 am Wednesday, March 23, 2011 3 2 _ N3 SVeel Shields 0 ' EW Straal PINM 1 - 16 46 ;NORTH TIM PM 0 ICU 45 0 - 4 2 Nona SG 2 15 38 ly�C1 13 8 0 2 0 d�b Page 3 of 3 9 Bicycle - Pedestrian Input Form Record Numb 218 1- -. D 5 2 1 0 AM -- -- g 3 Date Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4 1 "- Sf "Shields 0 1 E W 3veet 0 _ Plum _ 4T <NORTH TIM AM 3 D wu 45 0 0 0 u�m. SG 1 29 1 0 0 0 5 1 Page 1 of 3 8 af gott ieomm PO Box 580 80522-580 Fort Collins CO Turning Movement Study File Name : Shields 8 Plum 3-23-11 Site Code : 00000045 Start Date : 323/2011 Page No :2 +0 mins. 0]:SOAY 4 129 2 0 135 O]']pIW 2 3 4 0 Oi'JO ALL .30 ALL +15 mins. 4 173 10 0 187 2 2 4 0 9 22 192 6 8 70 12 0 30 +30 mins. 6 156. 3 0 165 0 0 2 8 20 321 5 12 23 22 0 57 +45 mins. 7 145 1 0 153 1 4 0 2 8 201 7 ]()(3 7 9 10 0 26 21 603 160 640 5 9 6 16 0 0 11 30 8 58 208 922 4 22 12 8 9 0 2TotalVdune %App. Total 3.3 94.2 2.5 0 16.7 30 53.3 0 5.8 92 2.2 39 `s0 53 0 142 PHF .750 .871 .400 00085fi .625 .563 .667 .000 .682 .659 .718 .786 7.5 35.2 37.3 0 000 Peak Hour Analysis Fmm 12:00 PM to 12.45PM - P]sIk 1 of 1 .13 .543 .602 .623 I�Pu - -- +0 mins. 22 282 2 0 306 Izmw 0 11 19 0 30 �2m PIA 10 240 23 0 273 �6 +15 mins. 12 232 3 0 247 4 10 9 0 23 11 211 13 7 14 0 27 +30 mins. 7 229 3 0 239 4 9 9 0 0 235 11 5 12 0 28 +45 mins. 7 243 2 0 252 4 5 7 0 22 16 20 12 189 12 0 221 14 9 12 0 35 Total Vokffne %App. Total PHF 48 986 4.6 94.4 .545 _874 .833 10 1 .000 0 0 1044 .%3 12 35 44 13.2 38.5 48.4 .750 .795 .579 .000 0 0 91 53 5.3 260 900 892 8 56 5.6 0 0 0 280 1009 7 38 . 31.4 25.6 10 14 31 52 43 0 0 0 31 121 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM m us-15 PM _ P .,f .758 .653 .865 -- .ri09 .000 .901 .679 .775 .929 .000 .A64 - 44 +0 mins_ +15 mins N" m 11 23 293 314 0 3 Y 2 13 17 8 0 0 22 22 Otoo PIA 17 18 218 246 21 20 0 0 256 2A4 OC30 RA 13 6 12 0 31 +30 mins. 27 375 5 1 27 0 13 15 i8 0 46 ±45 mins. 14 360 4 J;1429 16 8 30 21 252 15 0 288 13 15 20 0 48 Totalvdu 75 1342 12 32 60 0 D 30 104 23 79 248 964 13 0 284 17 17 14 0 481 x _ ToW 5.2 93.9 0.8 ;0; 30.8 57.7 0 7.1 86.7 690111256 6.2 0 53 64 0 173 PHF .694 .895 .600 .500 .556 .000 .8671.859 .956 .01 .000 .9ffit 32.4 24 30.6 .779 37 .800 0 .00o .901 7 APPENDIX B i 1 _ %'AILY i= 3. 4 ?6x) — 64. 8 i Gam. / 4�-7 44 n Zl %� S d U t ((S, " 4 ? 1 /VC 4 -Djf.,f' S AL -rage (1� I t/G �1C ��S72t�,cJ 0 `%-Uti: V 6S 6,49 41 X Pe r r e-. AM P 5 .D6 i 1 2 1 . B . R UNITS ec;�*2 BR UNITS] ' � (11) 3 BR UNITS' ;49TOTAL BEDSi 2 J Friz5-r Livtk4 OSECOND FLOOR PLAN ITC R ri 7 "1 r. b VM�K L 6 % TOTAL PARKING F 1 Ql - ------------ -- --- (DF I I f . !S I �LLOORPLAN .............. IT, SCOTTS PLAZA APARTMENTS VFLA FIRST FLOOR & SITE PLAN 7=:Z� L-±L. -I-] AbomLarimer County Land Information Locator lamm� 0- GIS& Mapping Table Of Contents Selected Results -SWTH,7AF7'AU Foit Collets N, L FOR TjRAM VILLA GE PUD (LEE. S, 7 PA JR VIEW 14f. SITE LoCATt4N RA, N WEST Maps: FProperty -Assessment: ---Parcel Detail Search I Owner Notification - --- ------ I.J .1i1.i...-,.. - Lir:. 1 5 : : 139 278 - !, 1 i L -KfS7EPNHEJGH7S SEE :ATTACHED SKETCH la67 Eirsrgre-r A-% ;VA)t-ess JccvPP ------------- ----- :h,-,[ltr-r 4 - P.ttachmerts Attachment A Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project Informatiou - -- --- - i I'rucct Name _ ..� rJy_..-- _.._.. //---- [' [�Y /V '? r� r RFC'j Uy (/li ram_ { Project Location Ste% rVJA1�!U) 7- ..._ .__ L ✓ O i ti r. TIS Assumptions Typc Uf Study - -- Fult: ✓ lJ Intcrmediaie: iy - Study Arta i3aundarics North: '? —� Snuth: I' U M �Vest:.SC 07-- Study Years Snort Ranee: i Long flange: �, iI-- uture. Traffic Growth Rite stud Inters stir ns 1. All access drives S. ----�----- .� -LL� a. -8. l ime Period for Study _ 7 00-4:QQjj �f `.60=fi;0% Sat Noon: /f I Passby: Cantiv,. Trim Generation hates Trip Adjustment Factors Overall Trip Distribution Mode Split Assumptions o.Tii);QLtC i ROadwaa ltrlproverneilis ! Otte —Traffic Studies - - i ca ' . s �e:qutrtnr special Stud} _' �D= {ill Etn2Er: i3-7 JV Lrivner County tlruan Ai Pa Srrn n SL3ndafds — RORnalnd ;rnd PcendCiec ApC:11. 200' - - — A.Jnnhrl by tJrmw nr:np�, �'tY J%'_V'+8 81'C. C:,y Z;! Yuri LOt6ng 2 APPENDIX A IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Scott Plaza Apartments development on the street system in the vicinity of the proposed development in the short range (2018) future. The Scott Plaza Apartments site is a proposed student housing development located in the southwest quadrant of the Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersection in fort Collins, Colorado. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: • The development of the Scott Plaza Apartments site is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Scott Plaza Apartments will generate approximately 608 daily trip ends, 55 morning peak hour trip ends, and 78 afternoon peak hour trip ends. • Current operation at the Shields/Plum and Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersections is acceptable. • In the short range (2018) future, a signal will not be warranted at the Plum/Scott- Blue Bell intersection. • In the short range (2018) future, given development of the Scott Plaza Apartments and an increase in background traffic, the Shields/Plum and Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersections will operate acceptably with the existing geometry and control. No additional auxiliary lanes are required at any of the key intersections. • Acceptable level of service will be achieved for pedestrian modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines. Acceptable level of service will be achieved for bicycle modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines. Transit level of service is acceptable. _//—1—DE�ICI-1 Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 —7.1, rASSOCIATES Page 18 A& N � - Denotes Lane .. a) � — to w m U) � a� a� m (n Plum Street a� c m Q 0 U U) SHORT RANGE (2018) GEOMETRY Figure 9 —//I DELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 j# j=ASSOCIATES Page 17 IGeometry ' Figure 9 shows a schematic of the short range (2018) geometry. This is the existing geometry at the key intersections. No additional auxiliary lanes are required at any of the key intersections. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Scott Plaza Apartments site. The Scott Plaza Apartments site is located within an area termed as "pedestrian district," which sets the level of service threshold at LOS A for all measured categories, except for street crossing at LOS B. There are four pedestrian destinations within 1320 feet of the proposed Scott Plaza Apartments development. These are: 1) Colorado State University to the east of the site; 2) the commercial/residential uses to the south of the site; 3) the residential neighborhoods to the west of the site; and 4) the residential neighborhood to the north of the site. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix F. Acceptable pedestrian level of service is achieved for all pedestrian factors. Bicycle Level of Service Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Scott Plaza Apartments site. This area is considered to be a community/neighborhood commercial center. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, the level of service threshold for bicycles is LOS B. There are bicycle facilities along Plum Street and Shields Street. Bike Lanes are not required on local streets. The Scott Plaza Apartments site is connected to the bike lanes on Plum Street and Shields Street which satisfies the LOS B criteria. The bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix F. Transit Level of Service t This area is served (within 1320 feet) by transit routes 2, 3 and 11. The Scott Plaza Apartments development is located in an area defined as "mixed -use centers and commercial corridors" for the purpose of public transit level of service evaluation. In the ' future, transit service will be improved as depicted on the Fort Collins Transit System Plan. The future level of service will be in the B category. DELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 7 %=ASSOCIATES Page 16 TABLE Short Range (2018) Background Peak Hour Operation Level ofService PM, Shields/Plum (signal) EB LTIF/RT D I D WB LTrF C D WB RT A A WB APPROACH C D NB LT A D NB T/RT A A NB APPROACH A B SB LT A B SB T/RT A B SB APPROACH A B OVERALL A B Plum/Scott-Blue Bell (stop sign) EB LTrT/RT A A WB LTrr/RT A A NB LTIT/RT A B SB LTfF/RT B B TABLE 4 Short Range (2018) Total Peak Hour Operation POP( Shields/Plum (signal) EB LTrF/RT D D WB LTrF C D WB RT A A WB APPROACH C D NB LT A E NB T/RT A A NB APPROACH A B SB LT A B SB T/RT A B SB APPROACH A B OVERALL A B Plum/Scott-Blue Bell (stop sign) EB LTTT/RT A A WB LTfT/RT A A NB LTTF/RT A B SB LTIT/RT B B DELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 -7,t1r—ASSOCIATES Page 15 a) a) � � w — cn (D m a a) m r m cn M 1/20 f 11 /200 /49 3/3 1 f r 196/181 — o rn 1/5 N O N V' Plum Street SHORT RANGE (2018) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC _--Ili—DELICH 7 1 (—ASSOCIATES N AM/PM 0 rn c') v C\M to � 5/13 c') C° — 16/61 17/67 97/91 80/73 co o 71178 —� 1 o M co UJ N O Figure 8 Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 Page 14 1/3 m N 7 C N Q 0 O V U) 10/48 N N (V V Plum Street SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC DELICH [—ASSOCIATES N AM/PM a� a� w m a� L w O N 7 -a3/13 18/11 11/7 —► 13/8 co Figure 7 Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 Page 13 co co )C to cD f .1 a) a) � w — cn m a a) u, m cn 1 /20 f 67/200 � 1/1 3/3 --)� `1 t r 196/181 — M o M 0/2 o 0 Plum Street N AM/PM 0 rn co v o � co 5/13 N (0 w 13/48 17/67 79/82 1 69/66 - a o 58/70 OD 'o- O° , N (O M N O SHORT RANGE (2018) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 DELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 1 (—ASSOCIATES Page 12 Background Traffic Projections Figure 6 shows the short range (2018) background peak hour traffic at the Shields/Plum and Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersections. Background traffic projections for the short range future horizon were obtained by reviewing various traffic studies prepared for this area of Fort Collins. Traffic volumes on the area streets were increased at a rate of 1.5 percent per year. Traffic from The District at Colorado State University was included in background traffic volumes. Trip Assignment ■ Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution ' process. The site generated trip assignment for the Scott Plaza Apartments development is shown in Figure 7. The site generated traffic was combined with the background traffic to determine the total forecasted traffic for the study area. Figure 8 shows the short range (2018) total (site plus background) peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The Shields/Plum intersection is currently signalized. The Plum/Scott-Blue Bell will not meet peak hour volume signal warrants in the short range (2018) future. In addition to this, the intersection spacing would not meet the signal spacing criteria. Operation Analysis Operation analyses were performed at the Shields/Plum and Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range future, reflecting the year 2018 condition. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6, the Shields/Plum and Plum -Blue Bell intersections operate in the short range (2018) background traffic future as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the morning and afternoon peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8, the Shields/Plum and Plum/Scott-Blue ' Bell intersections operate in the short range (2018) total traffic future as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The key ' intersections will operate acceptably during the morning and afternoon peak hours. ' _// 4—DELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 -� [—ASSOCIATES Page 11 t 5% TRIP DISTRIBUTION —/LDELICH —71 rASSOCIATES U m t Plum Street 40% 30% Alk 25% Figure 5 Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 Page 10 SITE PLAN -- 1 4-DELICH 1 [-ASSOCIATES Figure 4 Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 Page 9 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Scott Plaza Apartments is a student residential development with 194 beds (79 apartment dwelling units), located in the southwest quadrant of the Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersection. Figure 4 shows a site plan of the Scott Plaza Apartments. The short range analysis (Year 2018) includes development of the Scott Plaza Apartments and an appropriate increase in background traffic due to normal growth and other potential developments in the area. The site plan shows that the Scott Plaza Apartments will have access to both Plum Street and Scott Avenue. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this ' upon the existing and proposed street system. Trip generation information contain in Trip Generation, 9th Edition, ITE was used to estimate the trips that would be generated by the proposed use at the Scott Plaza Apartments site. Persons (beds) was used as the trip ' generation variable. A trip is defined as a one-way vehicle movement from origin to destination. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. The trip generation of the Scott Plaza Apartments development resulted in 608 daily trip ' ends, 55 morning peak hour trip ends, and 78 afternoon peak hour trip ends. TABLE 2 Trip Generation Code f < ; ;a` AWDTE r ," , ` AM,Peak ,Hour < r ryi Peak;tour ' < t '7,:' T!N ►fate In Rate Ouk= Race " RMC . s In Out', 220 Apartments 194 Persons EQ 608 0.05 11 0.23 44 EQ 51 EQ 27 Trip Distribution Trip distribution for the Scott Plaza Apartments was based on existing/future travel patterns, land uses in the area, consideration of trip attractions/productions in the area, and engineering judgment. Figure 5 shows the trip distribution for the short range (2018) analysis future. The trip distribution was agreed to by City of Fort Collins staff in the scoping discussions. LDELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 �.S [—ASSOCIATES Page 8 Transit Facilities This area of Fort Collins is served by Transfort Route 2, 3, and 11. TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation : t _.4 "E 4 x -. `5 InterS£Ct10R n a 3 u` 9 C� 11 _ IYIOVBfrleltt { `34 ._F t. y w t}} �AM ♦y * � P11tA� i u Shields/Plum (signal) EB LT/T/RT D _ D WB LT/T C D WB RT A A WB APPROACH C D NB LT A B NB T/RT A A NB APPROACH A A SB LT A A SB T/RT A B SB APPROACH A B OVERALL A A Plum/Scott-Blue Bell (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A NB LT/T/RT A B SB LT/T/RT B B �1—LDELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 A : r—ASSOCIATES Page 7 a) a� a� a) L a> U — v) a) m a a) am m cn cn �1/19 )0 to co -o52/142 Plum Street 3/3 --,#( 1 f r 1371144 — I(' o I(' 0/2 O (D N AM/PM M W ch I'- \ N N N m 5/12 (\1 (O - 9/33 f + )�— 16/62 55/66 52/55 - 40/58 co ` m OD rn N O (O RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 --// I ---DELI CH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 (—ASSOCIATES Page 6 ' Existing Traffic ' Due to construction along Plum Street, recent peak hour traffic counts were not obtained. Peak hour counts (2011) from "The District at Colorado State University," were factored by 1.5 percent per year to get the recent (2013) peak hour traffic. Recent ' peak hour traffic volumes at the Shields/Plum and Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersections are shown in Figure 3. Raw traffic count data is provided in Appendix B. Existing Operation ' The Shields/Plum and Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual.. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 3, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. The key intersections ' currently operate acceptably. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS ' Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix C. The Scott Plaza Apartments site is in an area termed "commercial corridor." In areas termed "commercial corridors," acceptable overall operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined ' as level of service D or better. At signalized intersections, acceptable operation of any leg and any movement is level of service E. At unsignalized intersections in commercial corridors, there is no minimum level of service criteria. In other TIS's, Fort Collins staff ' has indicated that level of service E is considered to be acceptable. This is considered to be normal and acceptable in urban areas. Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities in this area were built under earlier street standards. Generally, sidewalks exist along all streets in this area. Sidewalks exist along this site. There are pedestrian crosswalks and ramps at all key intersections. At the Shields/Plum intersection, there were 46 pedestrians in the morning peak hour and 106 pedestrians in the afternoon peak hour. These pedestrian volumes were used in the Shields/Plum intersection operation analysis. Bicycle Facilities There are bicycle lanes along Shields Street and Plum Street. Scott Avenue and Blue Bell Street are local streets, therefore, do not have bicycle lanes. At the Shields/Plum intersection, there were 64 bicyclists in the morning peak hour and 76 bicyclists in the afternoon peak hour. At the Shields/Plum intersection, westbound Plum Street has a "bike box" to help move bicycles across Shields Street. These bicycle volumes were used in the Shields/Plum intersection operation analysis. �.LDELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 -71 , [—ASSOCIATES Page 5 a) aD w Y — <n (D m a a) m C m rn Plum Street EXISTING GEOMETRY _—//i DELICH —;f ,l f—ASSOCIATES A& N in AM/PM Figure 2 Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 Page 4 N > Laurel Street Q_ Y U _T m L U � � m Plum Street v 0 U U) Elizabeth Street cott Plaza partments JI,ALt: 1 "=WU SITE LOCATION _- /4--wDELICH 1 (-'ASSOCIATES Figure 1 Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 Page 3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Scott Plaza Apartments is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily residential and commerciall/office. There are existing residential land uses to the north, east, and west of the site. There are existing commercial/office land uses to the south of the site. The center of Fort Collins is east of this site. Streets The primary streets near the Scott Plaza Apartments are Shields Street, Plum Street, Scott Avenue, and Blue Bell Street. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the existing geometry at the Shields/Plum and Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersections. Shields Street is east of the proposed Scott Plaza Apartments site. It is a north - south street classified as a four -lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Shields Street has a four -lane cross section. At the Shields/Plum intersection, Shields Street has a northbound and a southbound left -turn lane and two through lanes in each direction. The Shields/Plum intersection has signal control. The posted speed in this area of Shields Street is 30 mph. Plum Street is north of (adjacent to) the proposed Scott Plaza Apartments site. It ' is an east -west street classified as a two-lane collector on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Plum Street has a two-lane cross section. At the Shields/Plum intersection, Plum Street has a westbound left-turn/through lane, a westbound right -turn lane, and all eastbound movements are combined into a single lane. At the Plum/Scott- Blue Bell intersection, Plum Street has all movements combined into single lanes. The ' Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersection has stop sign control on Scott Avenue and Blue Bell Street. The posted speed in this area of Plum Street is 25 mph. ' Scott Avenue is east of (adjacent to) the Scott Plaza Apartments site. It is a north - south street classified as a local street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. There is perpendicular parking on the west side of the Scott Avenue. At the Plum/Scott-Blue Bell intersection, Scott Avenue has all northbound movements combined into a single lane. There is no posted speed on Scott Avenue. ' Blue Bell Street is north of the Scott Plaza Apartments site. It is a north -south street classified as a local street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. At the Plum/Scott- Blue Bell intersection, Blue Bell Street has all southbound movements combined into a ' single lane. There is no posted speed on Blue Bell Street. LDELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 %1, r—ASSOCIATES Page 2 I. INTRODUCTION This intermediate transportation impact study (TIS) addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development of the Scott Plaza Apartments site. The proposed Scott Plaza Apartments site is located in the southwest quadrant of the Plum/Scott intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the owner/developer (Taylor Fitzpatrick Capital, LLC), the project planning consultant (Ripley Design), the project architects (Vaught Frye Larson Architects), and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff. The Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions form and related documents are provided in Appendix A. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins TIS Guidelines in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards" (LCUASS). A scoping discussion was held with the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff. Due to the trip generation, this is an intermediate transportation impact study. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation —DELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 [—ASSOCIATES Page 1 LIST OF TABLES 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .... 7 2. Trip Generation ............................................... 8 .......................................................... 3. Short Range (2018) Background Peak Hour Operation.. ................... .................... 15 4. Short Range (2018) Total Peak Hour Operation..................................................... 15 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Site Location............................................................................................... 3 2. Existing Geometry ..................................................................................................... 4 3. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ....................... 6 4. Site Plan....... 9 5. Trip Distribution......................................................................................I........--...... 10 6. Short Range (2018) Background Peak Hour Traffic ................................................ 12 7. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic........................................................................... 13 8. Short Range (2018) Total Peak Hour Traffic........................................................... 14 9. Short Range (2018) Geometry ............................................................................... 17 APPENDICES A. Base Assumptions Form B. Peak Hour Traffic Counts C. Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) D. Short Range (2018) Background Peak Hour Operation E. Short Range (2018) Total Peak Hour Operation F. Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service Worksheets .--// LDELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 �� [—ASSOCIATES TABLE OF CONTENTS ' I. INTRODUCTION.. 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................. 2 ' Land Use..................................................................... 2 Streets.............................................. 2 ExistingTraffic................................................................................................................ 5 ExistingOperation........................................................................................................... 5 Pederstrian Facilities ......................... 5 BicycleFacilities.............................................................................................................. 5 5 r Transit Facilities.............................................................................................................. I_ III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ........ 8 TripGeneration............................................................................................................... 8 Trip Distribution.................................••-----.................-----• 8 Background Traffic Projections .............................................. 11 ' Trip Assignment...................................................................................................•- ...... 11 SignalWarrants............................................................................................................ 11 Operation Analysis........................................................................................................ 11 ' Geometry.......................................................................•----...---.................---................ 16 Pedestrian Level of Service.......................................................................................... 16 BicycleLevel of Service................................................................................................ 16 TransitLevel of Service...............................................................:................................. 16 IV. CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................18 L-DELICH Scott Plaza Apartments TIS, September 2013 %.i,, rASSOCIATES SCOTT PLAZA APARTMENTS TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO SEPTEMBER 2013 Prepared for: Taylor Fitzpatrick Capital, LLC. 7825 E Gelding Drive Suite 102 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 Project #1373