Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREDTAIL PONDS - PDP - PDP130030 - REPORTS - CITY STAFF• One of the key aspects of the project had been the position and angle of the building provide separation from the adjacent office building to the south. 23 I .��[ t u r• I111 rr-rir wr rn �• —. IIIIIII�.�_ snv ��� rs semetm u: wrrsssrm - uu Ir Il NY �• Illegal d 'Ll Here you can see how the detail, massing, color and materials have been use to break up and cpae down the building on all 4 sides. 22 • Here I want to pint out he progression of color and materials • We recommended that the colors be a bit more muted, and that brick be added to the east to balance out the building and add to the feel of quality expected in the TOD zone. 21 • Here we can see the progression of the form and detail through the process, through use of • Recess an projected wall modules, contrasting materials and parapet accents; • To the south you can see the one story elements where the building gets closer to the PL. • I also want to point out the roof parapets, we recommended that the repeating patterns of steel accents and parapets be broken up a bit, so that the pattern was less uniform. 20 FLY)�77.irrt�r,,uri*\ W JJ 11 J AJ.1\Y JIL 0 c ryof Fnrt C'nllin • A lot of focus on the architecture during D.R. • White shell building is what was presented at the City neighborhood meeting, and we can see the progression o breaking down of building faces into modules and breaking up the roofline with sloped areas and parapet accents. • Materials are mixed with lap siding, corrugated metal, scored cement panels, and brick metal accents. 19 • Here I want to point out the progression of the parking design through development review. • As part of the modification rested to the TOD standards, the design focussed on enhancing the parking lot to make it "more urban, more street character with angled parking, trees in grates, one way narrow drive isles, less drive isle, more landscaped median, plaza space along the entrance to tie the parking area to the building. • The standards require that the entrance face the streets and not parking lots, and that no parking be allowed btw. the front or side of a building. IN • This is the plan that was approved in 2006 and has expired. • Mix of Multi -family and two- family, 51 units total, ten buildings 17 Here are the three buildings located south of Coronado Court 16 Here you can see the closest building to the south. lr� Spatial Transition 14 ort�s rysirzn ew*ialce:ewenx�-em.ur->mrri xouBelGMmgln REDTAIL PONDS swnwenE noesen SOLAR STUDY This angle and position also helps with shadowing 13 -11 This angle and position also helps with shadowing I MdXPLY15dBI15.I(IM-4®fM Vtl�9.r@VYlM4MgR1M wx_LM. KPry �TCrY lil on G '�iS r�m .au 2L6-r]La 9Nn•W �MYOY�irM.Ya.auwmaiapnW �11�_Y �OA'�V IauY}ats�y�aMYY � JLCr1 This angle and position also helps with shadowing Before I get into the highlights of the development review, I want to zoom in a little closer and point out: • Right of way that's proposed to be vacated • Drainage feature to the west • Existing mature trees along the south portion of Woodleys _ II3 l ;8J1llGE ACCE6•DR&; SOUTH COLLEGE _ _. 0 AVENUE ACCESS — ® � wnWl MMO CONTROL PLAN 01-'£°1O �e UPDATE - IIIIIIIII « nWWsi F019:L CPEII %IWY iOFNPVI . Before I get into the highlights of the development review, I want to zoom in a little closer and point out: • Right of way that's proposed to be vacated • Drainage feature to the west • Existing mature trees along the south portion of Woodleys Project Review Building Orientation & Site Placement (privacy, shading, land use transition) Parking area design • Buffering & transition • Building massing & detail Connectivity Landscaping Overall Code compliance G"t Collns Public Input: • Operational — ex: security, safety, property value, proximity • Location / Intensity of Use Building Height / # Stories • Building color I appearance 7 • Privacy, amenity locations • Compatibility — scale, form mass, height Fencing Land height / blocked views • Trail Lighting Cfty f lllns Key features I'd like to point out here: • General Commercial and TOD overlay, surrounded by Urban Estate, Low Density Residential and POI • BNSF railroad to the west • Woodley's to the north and the MAX South transit center • Redtail Grove Natural Area to the south • Fossil Blvd. expected to be siganalized in December 2013, early 2014 • Mason trail • Neighborhoods: W: Applewood, SE: Fossil Creek Meadows, NE: Fairway Estates, NW: Clarendon Hills 6 Staff Finding, Modifications and Determination of Infeasibility -- (i) either compliance with Section 3.8.30(D)(1) Block Structure is deemed infeasible or that the Modification of Standard to Section 3.8.30(D)(1) Block Structure is approved and; • (ii) provided that the Modifications to Section 3.10.3(A) Building Orientation and Section 3.10.4(C) Off -Street Parking are approved. Forte 't��W=s 5 Summary of Staff Finding -- Project complies applicable standards and procedures: • Article 2, Development Review Procedures; • Division 4.21, General Commercial District (C-G); And Article 3 — General Development Standards provided that; ort 4 Cgllns Staff Recommendation: Approval -Lnl`'s Key features I'd like to point out here: • General Commercial and TOD overlay, surrounded by Urban Estate, Low Density Residential and POI • BNSF railroad to the west • Woodley's to the north and the MAX South transit center • Redtail Grove Natural Area to the south • Fossil Blvd. expected to be siganalized in December 2013, early 2014 • Mason trail • Neighborhoods: W: Applewood, SE: Fossil Creek Meadows, NE: Fairway Estates, NW: Clarendon Hills Redtail Ponds Permanent Supportive Housing Project Development Plan #130024 ,-F,�rt`ins