The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRIGDEN FARM FILING SEVENTEEN - FDP - FDP130033 - CORRESPONDENCE -f Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Please add a note addressing the vacation of the floodplain easement. The note should reference the reception number of the dedicated easement, the fact that it is shown on Rigden Farm Filing Six, and the recording information of the vacating document. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: For clarity, and because Tracts B, C & D are access easements over all of the Tracts, you may remove the 20' easement if you so choose. See redlines. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Repeat Comment: All curves must have chord bearings & distances. See redlines. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/1812013: Repeat Comment: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the public land corners shown for control. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Repeat Comment: Please tie Blocks 2 & 3 to the Basis Of Bearings. See redlines. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Repeat Comment: Please provide descriptions for the public land corners shown for control, per Board Rule 6.8.2. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Please show the distance from the E 1 /4 Corner along the section line. See redlines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Please show all bearings in the same direction around the boundary. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Please correct the sheet numbering in the key map on sheet SP1. See redlines. Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Barnes, 970-416-2355, pbarnes()fcuov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 09/06/2013: no comments Comment Originated: 09/06/2013 Page 5 of 5 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, .970.218.2932, ischlam(cDfcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: The Erosion Control Report is lacking a Percent Existing Vegetative Density. The Erosion Control Report is lacking a Sequence Chart (an example was supplied in the Erosion Control Report's Cover). Please submit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416-2418, wlamargue(aMcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Block 2 grading looks to not be changed from previous submittal. Please provide spot elevations and detailed grading for this block. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Block 3 grading has a back yard swale that needs to be located off of the lots in a,tract or common space maintained by the HOA. Lots with backyard swales normally are altered by the lot owners which could block future drainage. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, jcountv(.fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Repeat Comment: Please change the sheet numbering, so that each sheet is not the same. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Repeat Comment: There are line over text issues on all sheets. See redlines. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: There is a line over text issue on sheet 7. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: No comments. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Does "of RFMF, LLC, A Colorado Limited Liability Company" need to be added to the Owners signature block? Please call John directly at 221-6565, if this is not clear. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Are there any Lienholders? If so, please add a signature block. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/18/2013 09/18/2013: Please update the title commitment. Page 4 of 5 Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Add these landscape notes: Landscaping must be secured with an irrevocable letter or credit performance bond or escrow account for 125% of the valuation of the materials prior to issuance of building permits. Street trees shall be installed by residential lots by the developer at time of CO, unless time of year limits tree planting, in which case residential street trees shall be planted within than 6 months of CO. The Developer shall replace dead or dying street trees after planting unit final inspection and acceptance by the City of Fort Collins Forestry Division. All street trees must be established, an approved species and of acceptable condition prior to acceptance. Street tree locations and numbers may be adjusted to accommodate driveway locations, utilities separation between trees, street signs and street light. Street trees to be centered in the middle of the lot to the extent feasible. Quantities shown on plan must be installed unless a reduction occurs to meet separation standards. Comment Number: 7 09/17/2013: Comment Originated:'09/17/2013 Review landscape note number 15 with the City Planner. (Parkways to the front or side of a residential lot are not required to have underground automatic irrigation.) Landscape surface treatment and irrigation of parkways should be to the City of Fort Collins Streetscape and Median Standards. Describing the landscape surface in parkways by residential lots and how it will be irrigated would help define the treatment of this area on the plan. Forestry recommends that adequate irrigation be available for the establishment and growth of street trees. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Seth Lorson, 970.2246189, slorson fcgov.com Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 09/12/2013: For the final plat of Ridgden Farm Fil 17; FDP130033 There are two tracts that did not get transferred into the name of: RFMF LLC back in 2012 when the other tracts got transferred. . They are: TRACT AV, RIGDEN FARM 6TH, FTC 20040051421 Still in Name of: RIGDEN FARM LLC and TRACT AW, RIGDEN FARM 6TH, FTC 20040051421 RIGDEN FARM LLC Comment Originated: 09/12/2013 So, if they don't do a quit claim deed to change the name before the plat is recorded, then RIGDEN FARM LLC will also need to sign the plat. Thank you, Megan Harrity Subs/Assessor's Office 970-498-7065 mharrity@larimer.org Page 3 of 5 Comment Number: 1 ... Comment Originated: 09/16/2013 09/16/2013: No comments. , iM Department: Forestry ; Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221-6361, tbuchananOicgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Use canopy shade trees as street trees. Some ornamental trees are shown as street trees but should be changed to canopy shade trees. Ornamental trees such as Chanticleer pear could be used near a street light if that prevented planting one shade tree by that lot. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: All the lots on sheet LP3 are all less than 60 feet wide so please show one street tree per lot. (LUC 3.2.1 D 2 a If two or more consecutive residential lots along a street each measure between 40 and 60 feet in street frontage width, on tree per lot may be substituted for the 30-40 spacing requirement. ) To meet the utility separation, driveway separation, spacing between trees and allow room for driveways only one tree per lot can fit on these narrow lots on LP3. Side lot trees should be spaced at approximately 40 feet spacings. Comment Number: 3 09/17/2013: Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 Show street light locations and provide 40 feet separation. Also provide tree locations that meet the tree utility separations distances in LUC 3.2. G Where stops signs are to be located provide at least 20 feet of separation between the stop sign and street trees Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: On Sheet LP2 show street trees at approximately 40 foot spacing. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Skymaster English oak has been used. This is a good shade tree but on recent project Forestry staff has found that it is not available in the trade. Due to lack of availability change Skymaster English Oak to Skyline Honeylocust. Page 2 of 5 City of F6rt Collins September 18, 2013 Michael Brake Stow N20 8t-y- 2 G,2aD„�fi (: tCK5M\4 : 51 aEr C-1 hla� 4� eUy3 S c j�T (� tiE}rS TBtE S JR Engineering & Landmark Planning 2900 S College Ave. Suite 3D Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Rigden Farm Filing Seventeen, FDP130033, Round Number 1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Seth Lorson, at 970-224-6189 or slorson@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970.221.6573, slanaenberger(iUcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Plat - The following note needs to be added to the plat. There shall be no private conditions, covenants, or restrictions that prohibit or limit the installation of resource conserving equipment or landscaping that are allowed by Sections 12-120—12-122 of the City Code. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Sheet 3 — The shared driveways need to be built to match the other shared driveways in the neighborhood — which means that they do not have truncated domes at these driveways. Truncated domes are not provided at residential driveways. The notes regarding the truncated -domes need to be removed. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Sheet 3 — the 2 notes regarding the driveway type is incorrect. The driveway type would be a type I since the sidewalk in this area is detached. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Landscape Plan — you have several notes on the landscape plan regarding requirements or limitations on the driveways so you might want to add the following to the notes as well. Per the Development Agreement for this property the minimum driveway separation is 8 feet. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Page 1 of 5