The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHICKORY COMMONS - FDP - FDP130014 - CORRESPONDENCE -Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05128/2013: What is the 1" water service between Bldgs 6 & 7? If this is needed, the curb stop and meter pit must be located near the drive in a location comparable to the other curb stop/meter pits. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: All sanitary sewer with less than 4 feet of cover must be insuloated. Show insulation in the plan & profile. Provide a detail showing the placement of the insulation. Include a specification for the insulation suitable for underground applications. Provide the design showing the thickness and width of the insulation. Comment Number: 4 05/28/2013: Add stationing on the sewer services. Comment Number: 5 05/28/2013: Show all water & sanitary crossings on the storm profiles. Comment Number: 6 05/28/2013: Where is the profile for the storm extending east from Inlet 1? Comment Number: 7 05/28/2013: Correct the north arrows on Shts C4 & C5. Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Barnes, 970416-2355, pbarnesna fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/09/2013 05/09/2013: no comments Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please add leaders to define the City property to the east of this project. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please include the beneficiary ("to the owners of Hickory Commons") of the easements outside of the boundary. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please correct the titles in the index on sheet 1, to match the actual sheet title. See redlines. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05129/2013: Please rotate the text 180 degrees on sheet 2, so that it is plan readable. See redlines. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05129/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 2. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanfordnafcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please revise the related notes in your Signs & Pavement Marking Notes (Sht C2) to read as shown below: 6. PRIOR TO PERMANENT INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND SYMBOLS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE TEMPORARY TABS OR TAPE DEPICTING ALIGNMENT AND PLACEMENT OF THE SAME, THEIR PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS TRAFFIC ENGINEER PRIOR TO PERMANENT INSTALLATION OF STRIPING AND SYMBOLS. 11. A FIELD INSPECTION OF LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS TRAFFIC ENGINEER OR HIS/HER DESIGNATE. ALL DISCREPANCIES INDENTIFIED DURING THE FIELD INSPECTION MUST BE CORRECTED BEFORE THE 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD BEGINS. 14. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING HAS BEEN DETERMINED BY THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF REVIEW. PRIOR TO INITIATION OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD, THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS TRAFFIC ENGINEER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE AND/OR STRIPING IF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS TRAFFIC ENGINEEER DETERMINES THAT AN UNFORSEEN CONDITION WARRANTS SUCH SIGNAGE ACCORDING TO THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) OR CDOT M AND S STANDARDS. ALL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SHALL FALL UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION (EXCEPT FOR TRAFFIC MARKINGS). Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington(c�fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Show/label all fittings and valves on the water mains and services. Contact: Jeff County, 970-2,ct-6588, 'countyo( fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please change the grayed out text to a solid text on sheets 6, 7 & 8. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please mask the text shown in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05128/2013: Please increase the text size on sheet 7. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 7, 8 & 9. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: The details on sheet 9 are fuzzy. Please sharpen up the text and linework. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please add a north arrow to sheet 9. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please correct the direction of the north arrow on sheets C4 & C5. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets C1, C4, C5, C6, CT C8, C9, C10 & C11. See redlines. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please rotate the text 180 degrees on sheets C5, so that it is plan readable. See redlines. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: There are cut off text issues on sheet C8. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 3 & 5. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please add a north arrow to sheet 10. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: The details on sheet 10 are fuzzy. Please sharpen up the text and linework. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Are there any Lienholders? We need more than the response 'Please see the revised plat." for this comment. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05/29/2013: Please correct the spelling of "separate" on sheet 2. See redlines. Comment Number. 3 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/2812013: Chokecherry is typically specified as a clump and not by caliper. Consider specifying it as a 6 foot height clump form. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartinecbfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/09/2013 05/09/2013: In order to confirm that the electric utility plan will be viable, and to determine the electric development charges, Light & Power Engineering will need specifics concerning the electric service to the commercial/industrial component. Light & Power Engineering can be reached at(970)221-6700. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/09/2013 05/09/2013: Upon final approval, please send an AutoCad drawing of the utility plan to Terry Cox at TCOX@FCGOV.COM. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam(Dfcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 05129/2013: The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. The current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet these requirements. See redlines for corrections in the Erosion Control Plan. The Erosion Control Plan should be separated out from the Grading and Drainage because it is overcrowded and impossible to determine what all BMPs are called out for. It was also noted that there was no Inlet or Outlet Protection, Straw bales were called out for and are not a valid BMP. The Plan could also use a Key to better understand the symbols. Every BMP called out for on the plan should have a detail to match it. The site will also have to supply Erosion Control Escrow Calculations. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/31/2013: The grading along the south edge of the property is not clear. It looks like the detention HWL can not be met. Please clarify the grading with additional spot elevations and revise the grading where necessary. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/31/2013: Please add a drainage easement for the storm sewer taking off -site flows from the west. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/3112013: Please remove the storm sewer from the utility set that is taking flows from the property to the east. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/31/2013 05/31/2013: Please see redlined plan set for other minor comments. Department: Technical Services Comment Numbt 4 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Sheet C3 - There is a storm drainage pipe shown on this sheet and a couple other sheets that extends from the access drive to the east and across the eastern property line. There is no design or callout for this pipe and it is not mentioned in the drainage report. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Sheet C6 - The plans callout a 42" North Weld County Water District Ductile Iron Pipe that crosses the proposed storm sewer. Please contact NWCWD to discuss there crossing requirements, signature block, pipe clearance, etc. The pipe needs to be shown in the profile. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Sheet C6 - The storm profile appears to show inadequate cover over the storm pipe. Please include the proposed grade along Hemlock street in this profile and ensure that a minimum of 36" of clearance will be met in the ultimate condition. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Sheet C7 - The low point at the south end of the project does not appear to be a true low point. Please add additional spot elevations in this area to make it clear that no more than 750 square feet of private drainage is draining out the driveway and off the project. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Sheet C7 - The water surface elevation of the detention pond is 74.62 but in looking at contours and spot elevations it appears that the pond may spill prior to 74.62. Please add additional information. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: The natural area easements have been paid for but will need to be recorded when the project is reaching final mylar. Original copies of the Topic: Plat Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05128/2013: There is a proposed storm pipe that extends to the west project lot line and is not shown to be within an easement. Does this line need to be within a drainage easement? Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex(J�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: No comments. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanannafcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Please label Bur Oak in the plant as bullet gall resistant by including in list right after the name Bur Oak (only bullet gall resistant trees) Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Change landscape note number 9 to say ...... Prune plants only as recommended by a qualified horticulturist. Community Development and Neighborhood services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview June 13, 2013 Troy Jones MTA Planning & Architecture 608 S. Mason St. Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Hickory Commons, FDP130014, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Courtney Levingston, at 970416-2283 or clevingston@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970-416-2283, clevingston fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/17/2013 05/17/2013. The elevations saying "right and left side" are confusing. The concern is with which elevations will be facing the street for buildings 1 and 2 and 7. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/17/2013 05/17/2013: Note number 18 on the site plan should be reworded per the November 7, 2012 discussion stating that the ground Floor is not be be leased out separately or separately occupied from the residential unit above because the upper and lower Floors are not fire separated. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/17/2013 05/17/2013: Note 13 needs to be clairified saying that all meters, vents, conduit ect. will be painted to match. Which elevation will the meters be located? On buildings one, two and seven, they should not be facing the street. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970-221-6603, agingerichd)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: Sheet C3 - Does the storm pipe that extends to the western lot line require a drainage easement?