The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSILO STORAGE (EAST VINE STORAGE) - ODP - ODP120003 - CORRESPONDENCE -since 2008 and u., not believe a full revised TIS would find any ,,ifferent conclusions or impacts. What I do believe needs to be revised is the basic information within the TIS about this project. The TIS should revise the trip generation, the site plan in the TIS and compare and contrast the basics of the new site plan against the past site plan. It does not need to recount traffic nor re -analyze data. Just bring the basic project traffic and site information up to date with the current plan. If the past plan was not phased then the revised TIS will need to do the trip generation by phase. 10. The floodplain administrator for the Cooper Slough basin is Brain Varrella; 970.416.2217, bvarrella@fcgov.com. Please contact Brian or Mark Taylor, 970.416.2494, mtaylor@fcgov.com to schedule an individual meeting for this project. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: The proposed development requires quantity detention for the 100-year storm with a 2-year historic release rate. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: Water quality mitigation is required per the Fort Collins Storm Water Criteria Manual. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: The proposed development is required to pass any existing off -site flows safely through the site. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: Stormwater fees will be assessed at time of building permit. Comment Number: 5 . Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: A grading, drainage and erosion control plan and report are required at PDP. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/18/2012 09/18/2012: Please add a legal description of the property to sheet P-1.0. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/18/2012 09/18/2012: There are several line over text issues on sheet P-1.0. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/18/2012 09/18/2012: There are several line over text issues on sheet P-2.0. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-68200 wstanford(a)fcgov.com Topic: Offsite Work Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: Do expect some costs to remove and restripe the continuous left turn lane on Vine to have a break at your access. Topic: Traffic Impact Study Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: TIS was prepared in 2008. LCUASS policy states a study more than 3 years old will be required to be revised. The mix of old and new documents do not provide adequate information to verify the similarity or differtences of the past and present projects related to traffic expectations. I do not think conditions in that area of Vine Drive have changed much 09/19/2012: Adoiess numerals shall be plainly visible from the street fronting the property; posted with a minimum six-inch high numerals on a contrasting background. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416.2418, wlamargue(cDfcgov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 6 09/19/2012: Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 1. The majority of the property is in the 100-year FEMA-designated Cooper Slough floodplain, and must comply with Chapter 10 of City Code. A FEMA Flood Risk Map is attached. 2. Non-residential construction, outdoor storage, detention ponds, driveway and parking areas, and placement of new vegetation are allowed in the floodway if "no -rise" to the BFE can be shown. All of the above listed uses must be included in the no -rise analysis, which must be prepared by a licensed professional engineer. 3. Fencing is not allowed in the floodway unless it is designed to break away and is cabled together so it won't float downstream. 4. Non-residential construction, outdoor storage, fences, detention ponds, driveway and parking areas, and placement of new vegetation are allowed in the FEMA flood fringe. The lowest floor and all duct work, HVAC equipment, etc. of any structure must be elevated a minimum of 18-inches above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). This is the RFPE (BFE + 18 inches = RFPE). 5. Any recreational vehicle located in a FEMA basin floodway or flood fringe must be present for fewer than 180 consecutive days, or must be fully licensed and ready for highway use. If the vehicle is not licensed and is going to be on site for more than 180 days, it must meet the City's Chapter 10 requirements for a mobile (or manufactured) home. Those requirements deal with elevating the vehicle above the RFPE and anchoring it to prevent flotation. 6. Critical facilities are not allowed in the floodplain. Any waste facility for the RV's must be located out of the floodplain. 7. Any and all construction activities in the floodplain must be preceded by an approved floodplain use permit, $25 fee, and approved plans. If any floodplain modeling is performed to show no -rise, the permit fee is $325. The permit from can be obtained at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/what-we-do/stormwater/flooding/forms-documents. 8. Prior to issuing a certificate of occupancy for any structure, a FEMA Elevation Certificate, or a Floodproofing Certificate, is required to be submitted and approved. 9. Development review checklists for floodplain requirements can be obtained at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/what-we-do/stormwater/flooding/forms-documents. Please utilize these documents when preparing your plans for submittal. Please contact Shane Boyle of Stormwater Master Planning at sboyle@fcgov.com for floodplain CAD line work as required per the floodplain development review check list. 2. Should the prr,,.;rty wish to connect at some point in the futL.,.; they must contact the District to determine the best location to connect and follow the District requirements regarding inclusion into the District, fees, etc. 3. No connection to the existing District sanitary sewer is indicated as anticipated during any of the phases of development. The District requests the developer indicate in their future documentation what the current sanitary sewer service consists of (septic system?) and note whether they plan to connect to the District infrastructure during any of their planned future phases. The District has more than adequate treatment plant capacity to service the property referenced above. Any written agreements required to complete sanitary sewer connections to the property must be completed before connection to the District infrastructure can occur. Contact: Randy Siddens Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/24/2012 09/24/2012: Comments from ELCO Water: Size of waterline to be determined, reference number of fire hydrants and water services required. Flow and pressure values. Potentially some off -site infrastructure needed, as only a 6� main exists. Include a Utility Plan with the next step of review. Contact: Darwin Williams Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416.2869, jlynxwiler poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 01 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: Water supply to this development will be required. Water flow for commercial use requires a minimum 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. Comment Number: 02 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: A fire hydrant must be within 300 feet of all structures. Hydrant spacing to be on 600 foot centers. Comment Number: 03 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: Emergency access to this development will be required. Drive aisles must be Fire Lanes, with emergency access easements, at least 20' wide and unobstructed at all times. Any portion of the facility in excess of 150 feet from a Fire Lane is considered out of access and may be required to be fire sprinkled. Comment Number: 04 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: Fire lanes shall be designed as flat, hard, all-weather surface capable of supporting 40 tons trucks. Comment Number: 05 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/19/2012: The facility must be accessible by fire apparatus at all times of day or night. A Knox Box is therefore required for the main gate. Comment Number: 06 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 Department: Environmem,. Manning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, Topic: General Comment Number: 1 lexna.fcgov.com Comment Originated: 09/18/2012 09/18/2012: According to Section 2.3.2(H)(3)(5) of the Land Use Code, "the overall development plan shall show the general location and approximate size of all natural areas, habitats and features within its boundaries and shall indicate the applicant's proposed rough estimate of the natural area buffer zones as required pursuant to Section 3.4.1(E)." The submitted conceptual plan indicates a a buffer zone around the Cooper Slough, but it is appears the buffer zone is not aligned with the buffer standard of 300'. In addition, while several wetland areas are noted, a buffer zone around these wetlands should be illustrated as well. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/18/2012 09/18/2012: Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code applies at the time of PDP. An Ecological Characterization Study will need to be submitted at least 10 days prior to the PDP submittal. The ECS should address all of the required components in Section 3.4.1(D)(1) of the Land Use Code and the value of all of the site's natural habitats and features, as noted above. While a copy of the wetland delineation was provided in the ODP submittal, an ECS will need to be submitted with any PDP. In addition, the determination from the Corps regarding the wetlands will also need to be submitted. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/18/2012 09/18/2012: Please add a note on the Overall Development Plan sheet to read as follows, "Please see Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within the Natural Habitats Buffer Zone." In addition, please feel free to reference Section 2.3.2(H)(3)(5) to reiterate the areas delineated on the ODP are rough estimates of existing Natural Habitat Buffer Zones and that these areas will be delineated in greater detail on individual PDPs for the respective parcels. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartineofcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/06/2012 09/06/2012: Light & Power has no issues with the ODP. The developer needs to be aware that normal Light & Power electric development charges will apply. These charges can be phased along with the development. Please contact Doug Martine in Light & Power Engineering (224-6152) with any questions. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Seth Lorson, slorson(aD-fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Boxelder Sanitation District Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 1. District records indicate the property is not currently connected to the District infrastructure. Plans (ODP) are _ ,oject to review and approval by Planning a,... Zoning Board (Type II). Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 A neighborhood meeting is required prior to moving forward with the staff review process. . Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 The development is subject to the requirements in LUC Sec. 4.28(D) land use standards for industrial zone district, specifically screening requirements (4.28(D)(3). Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 The development is subject to the requirements in LUC Sec. 3.9 Development standards for the 1-25 corridor. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221-6501, tiegmund &fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 Please remove the identified phases of construction from the Overall Development Plan. You do not want to show construction phasing, rather label the "phases" as areas and identify the land uses. See example Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 You are showing too much detail on the ODP. Please refer to redlines and remove information that is not needed at this stage of review. You will go into greater detail once each area is designed for PDP submittal Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 Your traffic impact study was conducted in 2008. Contact the City's Traffic Engineer, Joe Olson (224-6062) to determine if an updated traffic study is needed for this project Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 You do not meet the criteria set forth in section 3.6.3 (E) and (F) in the Land Use Code as it relates to maintaining access points to adjacent developable properties and providing a local street system that will allow access to future developable land, from at least 3 arterial streets upon development of remaining parcels within the section mile. The current requirement is to provide a local street connection spaced at intervals not to exceed 660 feet along each development plan boundary that abuts potentially developable or re -developable land. For alternative compliance, reference 3.6.3 (H) in the Land Use Code. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 According to the Master Street Plan, E Vine Dr. adjacent to your property is classified as a 2 lane arterial street. See Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS) figure 7-3F for more information. City of ' Font Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. corn/developmentre view September 24, 2012 Ric Hattman Hattman Associates 145 W. Swallow Rd. Fort Collins, CO 80536 RE: Silo Storage ODP (East Vine Storage), ODP120003, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Seth Lorson, at 970-224-6189 or slorson@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Advance Planning Contact: Pete Wray, 970.221.6754, pwraya()fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/12/2012: Proposed uses listed in ODP are consistent with the East Mulberry Corridor Plan land use designation, and zoning of industrial. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 09/12/2012: The East Mulberry Corridor Plan identifies a majority of this property within the Cooper Slough drainage basin, related floodplain, and potential buffer area. Department: Current Planning Contact: Seth Lorson, , slorson a(�.fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/19/2012 The proposed use of outdoor and indoor storage is subject to administrative review and approval (Type 1) at time of a Project Development Plan (PDP); but all Overall Development