HomeMy WebLinkAboutREDTAIL PONDS - PDP - PDP130030 - CORRESPONDENCE - CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONneighborhood meeting, what are the next steps? If there is more public comments or concerns, do we
continue to contact you? I am unsure of the process, but I would like to make sure that I am being
proactive in learning more about as this is something that I feel strongly about.
Thanks again for your full consideration,
Dana Spanjer
4
The Corporation for Supportive Housing's recommends avoiding saturation concerns, especially
where neighborhoods can claim that they are impacted by having an unequal share of the city-wide
homeless services and programs.
In the 2013 application for Low Income Tax Credits, FCHA states that the project will "bring
residents to the south side of the city where the number of homeless individuals is much smaller."
• In a small city like Fort Collins, a project of this size will effectively transplant, not disperse, a
significant percentage of the existing population to a new area of town, creating a new imbalance.
This project will support on -site services by providing either new or additional offices to services
such as: Homeless Gear, Hand Up Cooperative, and Touchstone Health Partners, all of which are
currently located in North Fort Collins. Moving these services and/or adding additional offices also
creates a new imbalance.
• Residents and businesspeople along South College are reluctant to accept such a large-scale
migration for the same reasons that the residents and businesspeople of Old Town and the River
District are excited to see them moved.
Neighbors have been repeatedly unsatisfied with the FCHA's lack of a safety action plan in the event that
unauthorized guests or intoxicated residents arrive at the Supportive Housing Project. FCHA has been
clear that there will be tighter security to turn these offenders away —but where will they go from there?
• If unauthorized guests or intoxicated individuals are not allowed inside the building, they will not
wait around to be collected by the police, they will either hide in the nearby neighborhoods and
office developments, along the trail, in the parks and natural areas, or they'll re -board the MAX.
Simply turning people away is not an acceptable approach.
• The FCHA has said regarding a similar, prior project that there is a culture of conflict between the
currently housed residents and "...the homeless individuals they formerly associated with. They
often felt obligated to house their friends, who were still on the streets. This led to unauthorized
people in the building and many behavior problems from residents and their guests. Residents
often talked about the pressure they felt to be loyal to their former community. Some were victims
of being bullied or threatened if they didn't provide 'favors' to former friends, such as allowing them
into their units. There were also residents using their units to prostitute."
• If this describes the culture of Retail Ponds' target clientele, and if the FCHA will have tighter
security to expel people demonstrating undesirable behaviors, there needs to be a much more
detailed solution to manage the overflow and ensure the safety of the surrounding area, not just
the security of the building itself.
What is the long-term financial commitment from the City to keep this property, its residents and their
programs at the same high level of operations expected in year one?
• The City of Fort Collins has committed approximately $1 million to this project through CDBG and
HOME monies for start-up. How much more will the City contribute on an ongoing basis to ensure
that this project remains safe and successful, especially as the homeless population grows?
• The market study states that "no in -migration from outside Larimer County is anticipated" (page
55), however there are no data, statistics, surveys, studies from elsewhere, etc. to support this
statement. Before the development proceeds, the public deserves a more in-depth study on the
migration of transient individuals as a result of large-scale publicly funded projects.
• The rest of the project's financials (and the FCHA's overall balance sheet) are heavily dependent
on Federal housing vouchers and other HUD money, which is far from guaranteed as a result of
the vagaries of the political climate in Washington. Though it offers "Permanent" supportive
housing, what will happen to the project's success, security and daily operations in the event that
Federal funding dwindles?
Thank you for full consideration of all these factors; I am very interested and eager to hear responses to
these concerns. What is the time frame for the respective departments/agencies to respond to public
comment? When and where will responses be available to review? Also, will there be another
neighborhood meeting? How will information about that meeting be distributed? If there is not another
3
• The proximity and the size of this building (allowed to be a full two stories higher than any existing
due to the TOD overlay changes in code), along with such an increase in human activity, would
most likely be in conflict with the management goals of the natural area and may have long term
negative effects on the natural area.
Many residents, according to information provided by the FCHA, will be elderly and/or disabled. Is this
location appropriate for them?
• A market study commissioned by the FCHA on this site shows a poor walkability score: 43 out of
100. This is 13 points below the average score of the City.
• The study states that the location is "car dependent" while the FCHA states that most residents
won't have cars.
• While it is projected that the MAX will increase the site's walkability, it will also increase the
walkability score of the city overall, leaving the site still ranking below average.
• The walkability score is also based on able-bodied pedestrians. This project gives preference to
individuals who are disabled, and statistics from the Homeward 2020 study show that 46% of
disabled homeless have a walking disability.
• The market research study also indicates that the most vulnerable homeless (the ones the project
hopes to target) are older.
• Of the population that will live at Redtail Ponds, many will have difficulty getting around
independently, but this living situation will force them to rely on walking trails to mass transit, their
only way to access services located elsewhere in the city.
• For 9 months of the year, Fort Collins' climate is not ideal for elderly, walking -challenged
pedestrians, who are already at risk of injury from falls.
• Expecting physically disabled and elderly residents to navigate the trails and transit on foot is
unrealistic and unfair. How will they carry their groceries? How will they call for help if they get in
trouble, have a medical emergency, or fall on the bike path? How will they get around to services
that aren't located near MAX stops?
• The FCHA is aware of these risks, and has suggested that public case workers make trips for
those who are not able-bodied, or dedicating tax -funded dial -a -ride resources for resident use, but
those who need help could amount to half or more of the project's residents. Is it the best use of
taxpayer dollars to use case workers as errand -runners because the location depends so heavily
and unrealistically on walking to transit?
Is this location physically safe to live for disabled, elderly and mentally ill residents?
• The Redtail Ponds site abuts a state highway on the east, and is within several hundred feet of a
major railroad.
• US 287 handles a large volume of traffic with a posted speed limit of 55 mph.
• In 2012, a pedestrian attempting to cross 287 within blocks of the proposed project was
accidentally struck (and killed) by 3 different vehicles traveling southbound.
• Between 2007 and 2010, there were more than 10 major accidents at the intersection of Fossil
Creek Parkway and College Ave, and nearly 30 accidents at the intersection of Harmony Rd and
College Ave [City of Fort Collins 2011 Traffic Safety Summary]
• The traffic on US 287 is projected to increase steadily with the opening of the MAX south transit
station and the increase in population in the Fort Collins/Loveland area.
Part of the logic behind selecting this site was to distribute homeless individuals away from Old Town and
North Fort Collins, where there is a high concentration, to South Fort Collins, where there has historically
been none. But does gathering the homeless population up in a new area actually resolve the high -
concentration problem or benefit the City as a whole?
• The Fort Collins City Plan encourages the integration and distribution of affordable housing. It
recommends affordable housing to be part of individual neighborhoods and the larger community
rather than creating larger concentrations of affordable units in isolated areas.
2
Jason Holland
From:
rad.bag@gmail.com on behalf of Dana Spanjer <dana.spanjer@gmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, July 11, 2013 1:56 PM
To:
Jason Holland
Subject:
Public Comment Regarding Redtail Ponds Development (#91)
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Completed
Categories: Print
Hi Jason,
Following is a list of questions and observations I have had in response to the FCHA's Redtail Ponds
Development (#91). 1 hope planning and zoning will consider all of the following factors during the review
process:
While the proposed project satisfies the zoning requirements of this site, is a building of this size
appropriate for the surroundings?
• A four-story building, situated on a hill, is not in keeping with the 2- and 1-story office buildings or
low -density residential acreages and natural lands in the area. The closest four-story building (that
I could think of) is 2 miles away, at 3711 JFK Parkway.
• With frontage directly on College Ave, this building will represent a dramatic contrast with all other
developments, old and new, between Fort Collins and Loveland.
• The top of the building's parapet will be 46' from the top of the finished floor, which is almost
double the allowable height under the land use code for shading, if it was not exempted from this
standard (as a result of the commercial zoning). The height of the building combined with the site's
topography will result in a structure that towers over neighbors on every side including the street.
• Current residential density in the immediate area, a business park, is 0 people per acre. Current
residential density in nearby neighborhoods is between 1 and 2 people per acre. Residential
density of this project will be approximately 20 people per acre.
• The City of Fort Collins' City Plan has a strong emphasis on compatibility between new and
existing character for both residential and commercial developments.The Redtail Pond's building
massing and relationships to streets, sidewalks and adjacent buildings does not seem compatible
with the existing character of the current residential neighborhood or commercial area.
The adjacent Redtail Grove Natural Area has long been a community priority. Is the City's ongoing
investment in protecting this resource compromised by a development of this size?
• This natural area is currently designated as "sensitive." According to the City's natural
management plan, these sites "support rare plants, unique native plant communities,
concentrations of large raptors, rare nesting birds, concentrations of migratory bird species, and
key areas for wintering deer, as well as fragile rock outcrops or other geological features that can
be impacted by high visitor use. This designation carries with it the understanding that the primary
function of management is the maintenance and protection of those sensitive species and
features."
• Eighty one species of birds have been seen here including its namesake, red-tailed hawks (which
nest here), ferruginous hawks, northern saw -whet owls, and yellow -bellied sapsuckers. One of the
management's objectives is to protect nesting and feeding habitat for red-tailed hawks and other
raptors and one strategy for accomplishing this is to minimize the threat of human activity within
1/3 mile of hawk nesting trees during breeding season March 1-July.15 [Fossil Creek Natural
Areas Management Plan page 24], yet the proposed project is located approximately 850 feet from
the entrance trailhead to the Redtail Grove Natural area.
t